Fix Value Mapping Problem

Hi All
I am doing a fix value mapping for a perticular field.I am getting a value say Y001 from the client system which i convert it to Z001 in my system. I tested the XML in the message mapping test tab.It is giving proper result.But at the output file i am getting the same value of Y001 instead of Z001.Can anyone please provide any inputs on this.
Thanks
Amit

HI,
Please chek the imput values..
Sure if you fix the value in Fix Value mapping then you will get the resukt value otherwise empty.
Please see the below links
value mapping - /people/sreekanth.babu2/blog/2005/02/23/value-mapping-replication
Value mapping /people/sukumar.natarajan/blog/2006/10/23/accessing-value-mapping-defined-in-directory-using-java-functions
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?query=value%20mapping%20in%20xi&cat=sdn_weblog
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/08/valuemapping-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
/people/alessandro.guarneri/blog/2006/03/27/sap-xi-lookup-api-the-killer
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?query=value%20mapping%20in%20xi&cat=sdn_weblog
Regards
Chilla..

Similar Messages

  • Table lookup instead of fixed value mapping

    Hi Folks,
    My current scenario is that I have used fixed value mapping to map a single target field.  These details are actually maintained in the TP_Code table in R3 (a sample table).
    TradingPartner:SAP:Short Text
    PA:PA:Package
    PL:PAL:Pallet
    The table contains 20 entries.
    I am thinking that fixed value mapping is not a good option since there might have future changes in the TP_Code table.
    Is rfc lookup a good option?  But I am not sure which rfc to use and if there is any udf availble to be used in parsing the xml payload.
    Please advise.
    Thanks a ton!

    Thanks so much for the links!
    I managed to use and run the RFC lookup to an R3 table using JCo.  However, I am not getting the right result.
    I am getting the result in this format -> 800,PA,PAC,Package
    The correct output is PAC which is the third node.  Could this only be achieved by using java tokenizer?
    The code that I have used is as follows:
    Import com.sap.mw.jco.*;
    //write your code here
    String DBTABLE = a;
    String WHERE_CLAUSE = b" = ""'"c"'" ;
    String sapClient = "xxx";
    String hostName = "nnnxxx";
    String systemNumber = "xx";
    String userName = "nnnnn";
    String password = "******";
    String language = "EN";
    JCO.Repository mRepository;
    JCO.Client mConnection = JCO.createClient(
                   sapClient,
                   userName,
                   password,
                   language,
                   hostName,
                   systemNumber );
    // connect to SAP
    mConnection.connect();
    // create repository
    mRepository = new JCO.Repository( "SAPLookup", mConnection );
    // Create function
    JCO.Function function = null;
    IFunctionTemplate ft = mRepository.getFunctionTemplate("RFC_READ_TABLE");
    function = ft.getFunction();
    // Obtain parameter list for function
    JCO.ParameterList input = function.getImportParameterList();
    // Pass function parameters
    input.setValue( DBTABLE, "QUERY_TABLE");
    input.setValue( "," , "DELIMITER");
    //Fill the where clause of the table
    JCO.ParameterList tabInput = function.getTableParameterList();
    JCO.Table inputTable = tabInput.getTable("OPTIONS");
    inputTable.appendRow();
    inputTable.setValue(WHERE_CLAUSE,"TEXT");
    mConnection.execute( function );
    JCO.Table valueSet = function.getTableParameterList().getTable("DATA");
    String resultSet = valueSet.getString("WA");
    mConnection.disconnect();
    return resultSet;

  • Fixed value mapping

    Any one there to explain me what is fixed value mapping Coz when i used LOOK UPS , they told me you can used fixed value mapping instead of it , as i was having only to values , please send me a detail explanation abt it thanking you
    sridhar

    There is a lot of difference between fixed value mapping and Lookup:
    Fixed value mapping is used when you need to populate the some differnt target value based on some inpur value.
    Take example
    I have used fixed value M:
    My input is ABC
    Now for this input I wanted to poupulate some different values.
    Suppose when A comes in File it should map the target value to America.
    When B come it should map to Belgium
    and C -> California
    Now come to Looup:
    What is Lookup and why we need:
    Within an XI mapping it is a common requirement to be able to perform data lookups on-the-fly. In particular, there may be a need to look up some data that is maintained in an R/3 application.
    In the error handling topic we have seen the different validations which need to be performed on file. This can be done through Lookup.
    Some use cases:
    • Look up material number from table MARA.
    • Look up cost center budget.
    • Look up employee information.
    • Look up unit-of-measure (UOM) information from table t006a.
    • Lookup for raising an alert.
    The purpose of the lookup may be:
    • To perform application-level validation of the data, before sending it to the backend.
    • To populate fields of the XML document with some additional data found in the backend application.
    This is a form of value transformation.
    The "value mappings" offered by XI are not adequate in this case, since the data would have to be manually entered in the Integration Directory.
    There are two ways in which we can do lookup:
    • Call lookup method from GUI mapping.
    • Call lookup method from XSLT mapping.
    I think u got ur answer
    Thnx
    Chirag

  • Value Mapping Problem - Values not appearing in destination system

    hello everyone,
    Here's my scenario: XML > XI > IDOC
    I have a problem with the ValueMapping and FixedValue function in XI. When I test the message in the Integration Repository, I don't get any problems (the value is converted appropriately), but when I view the IDOC in SAP, the value that is supposed to be in the field is missing.
    When I check the payload in SXMB_MONI in XI, no conversion occurs. I have refreshed the caches, and everything seems to be fine. I don't know why the value mapping functions seem to have stopped working altogether. Will anyone be able to help me out with my problem?
    Thanks in advance!
    Glenn

    Hi Glenn Bumanlag,
            I think the values that you have given for source values (Agency and scheme)
    and Target values (Agency and scheme) may be mismatching so kindly chek that...even i got the same error in the past..........
    If you the this problem kindly change it accordingly and also refresh the cache once you that with this.........
    Kindly follow the below mentioned link and check if you have followed these steps.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00ee347e-aabb-2a10-b298-d15a1ebf43c5
    Thanks
    Sai     
    PS: kindly reward points if helpful

  • How to perform fixed value mapping in XSLT?

    Hi All,
    Kindly guide me to do a XSLT mapping for fixed values (done in graphical mapping)
    eg: if  Band         Role
                A             JSE
                B               SE
      and so on.
    Kindly help me out to implement the above logic using xslt.
    Thanks
    Deepika

    Hi,
    Please find the links below.
    xpath functions in xslt mapping
    Design time Value-mappings in XSLT
    File to Multiple IDocs (XSLT Mapping)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/01a57f0b-0501-0010-3ca9-d2ea3bb983c1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9692eb84-0601-0010-5ca0-923b4fb8674a
    Regards,
    Phani

  • XI Fixed Value Mapping - Mass function?

    Is there a quick way to upload 350 fixed value to value mappings in XI 7.0 (or 3.0)??
    Short of pasting in one entry at a time!
    Is SAP going to develop a more user friendly alternative to this painstaking task?

    > Hi,
    >
    > >>>>Is there a quick way to upload 350 fixed value to
    > value mappings in XI 7.0 (or 3.0)??
    > Short of pasting in one entry at a time!
    >
    > if you talk about fixed values (in message mapping)
    > then
    > you need to go one by one I'm affraid
    >
    >
    > >>>>Is SAP going to develop a more user friendly
    > alternative to this painstaking task?
    >
    > who knows... maybe in next relase
    >
    It is fixed values in mapping!
    I was afraid of that...  I had been putting off the inevitable!
    Is there anyway we can put forward a request (for change) to SAP to change this in a later release??
    This is not the first time I have had to this, and I am sure, it won't be the last, or that I am the only person who has had to do this!

  • XSLT Value Mapping Problem

    Hello,
    we want to use the value mapping table in ID with XSLT.
    Here is my source:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Source xmlns:ns0="http://comsol-ag.com/xi/rfcxslt">
        <CustomerNumber>A</CustomerNumber>
    </ns0:Source>
    XSLT Mapping:
    <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:trg="http://comsol-ag.com/xi/rfcxslt" xmlns:ns0="http://test/xi/tsts" xmlns:ValueMap="java:com.sap.aii.mapping.value.api.XIVMService">
        <xsl:template match="/">
            <trg:Target>
                <CustomerInfo>
                    <xsl:variable name="sourceValue" select="ns0:Source/CustomerNumber"/>
                    <ID>
                        <xsl:value-of select="$sourceValue"/>
                    </ID>
                        <xsl:variable name="response" select="ValueMap:executeMapping('http://sap.com/XI/xi','SourceAgency','SourceScheme',string($sourceValue),'http://sap.com/XI/xi','TargetAgency','TargetSchema')"/>
                    <Name>
                    <xsl:value-of select="$response"/>
                    </Name>
                </CustomerInfo>
            </trg:Target>
        </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    Target:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    <trg:Target xmlns:trg="http://comsol-ag.com/xi/rfcxslt">
    <CustomerInfo>
      <ID>A</ID>
      <Name /> ???????????????????????????????????
      </CustomerInfo>
      </trg:Target>
    But the receiving data is not converted to value table in ID:
    Integration Directory Value Table :
    http://www.image-load.eu/out.php/i26896_pic1.PNG
    Please point out where i m going wrong.
    Thanks

    problem solved!

  • Value Mapping problems

    Hello Team,
    I'm trying to use the Value mapping functionality but is not working for me, all the transaccion failed because of invalid account code. Create the map rule but is not executed. Watching the B1iSN Graphical Design tool i see that i have an error on the Sender ObjectType it said "ValueMappingKeyTable B1.2004_JE does not exist on the B1iSN Repositiry" any idea???

    GARG23,
    I had a same issue.
    How did you manually create the B1.2004_JE file?
    Could you please show me step by step?
    Thansk
    Joanne
    Edited by: Joanne Lee on Mar 25, 2011 12:37 AM

  • Value mapping problem

    Hi
    I am following this scenraio
    /people/community.user/blog/2007/01/08/valuemapping-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
    but I am polling bunch of records (multiline)
    Scenario is successfull but in output file does not contain any  record?
    It contains only the following lines
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
      <ns0:MT_HRInfo xmlns:ns0="http://ValueMapping.com" />
    where I have to check for the problem ?
    Thanks
    manian

    Here it is
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping  -->
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external = P_Valmap</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized = P_Valmap</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = SXI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-01-20T14:16:48Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = DD7DFCA0A89011DB804E001676478B29</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0008</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0008</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = SXI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-01-20T14:16:49Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO1___0000</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = SXI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-01-20T14:16:49Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping http://ValueMapping.com IM_EmpInfo_To_HRInfo</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_EMPInfo_To_HRInfo_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_HRInfo/Record. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:291) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.Transformer.start(Transformer.java:68) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.execute(AMappingProgram.java:231) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.JavaMapping.executeStep(JavaMapping.java:63) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.Mapping.execute(Mapping.java:91) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.MappingHandler.run(MappingHandler.java:77) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleMappingRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:88) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:63) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceImpl.processFunction(MappingServiceImpl.java:80) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceObjectImpl0.processFunction(MappingServiceObjectImpl0.java:131) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.session.stateless_sp5.ObjectStubProxyImpl.invoke(ObjectStubProxyImpl.java:187) at $Proxy24.processFunction(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCDefaultRequestHandler.handleRequest(RFCDefaultRequestHandler.java:95) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer.handleRequestInternal(RFCJCOServer.java:113) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer$ApplicationRunnable.run(RFCJCOServer.java:171) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:94) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:162)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Runtime exception occurred during execution of application mapping program com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_EMPInfo_To_HRInfo_: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException; RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_HRInfo/Record. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.MappingRuntimeException: Runtime exception occurred during execution of application mapping program com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_EMPInfo_To_HRInfo_: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException; RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_HRInfo/Record. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.JavaMapping.executeStep(JavaMapping.java:72) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.Mapping.execute(Mapping.java:91) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.MappingHandler.run(MappingHandler.java:77) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleMappingRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:88) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:63) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceImpl.processFunction(MappingServiceImpl.java:80) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceObjectImpl0.processFunction(MappingServiceObjectImpl0.java:131) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.session.stateless_sp5.ObjectStubProxyImpl.invoke(ObjectStubProxyImpl.java:187) at $Proxy24.processFunction(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCDefaultRequestHandler.handleRequest(RFCDefaultRequestHandler.java:95) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer.handleRequestInternal(RFCJCOServer.java:113) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer$ApplicationRunnable.run(RFCJCOServer.java:171) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:94) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:162) Root Cause: com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_HRInfo/Record. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:291) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.Transformer.start(Transformer.java:68) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.execute(AMappingProgram.java:231) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.JavaMapping.executeStep(JavaMapping.java:63) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.Mapping.execute(Mapping.java:91) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.MappingHandler.run(MappingHandler.java:77) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleMappingRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:88) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingRequestHandler.handleRequest(MappingRequestHandler.java:63) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceImpl.processFunction(MappingServiceImpl.java:80) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.sbeans.mapping.MappingServiceObjectImpl0.processFunction(MappingServiceObjectImpl0.java:131) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.session.stateless_sp5.ObjectStubProxyImpl.invoke(ObjectStubProxyImpl.java:187) at $Proxy24.processFunction(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCDefaultRequestHandler.handleRequest(RFCDefaultRequestHandler.java:95) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer.handleRequestInternal(RFCJCOServer.java:113) at com.sap.engine.services.rfcengine.RFCJCOServer$ApplicationRunnable.run(RFCJCOServer.java:171) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:94) at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:162)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>

  • Fixed Values and Value Mapping

    Hi Experts,
         I hav a doubt regarding these to funnctions in Messege mapping. In both teh functions , we can change a value coming from Load to some thing else.
    Like
    A=1
    B=2
    C=8.
    The difference i hav noted is the in case of fixed values, we can assign the valsues in the messege mapping itself, and in case  of value mapping it is assigned in the value mapping table  in integartion directory, and thsi can be seen through  Runtime Workbench in Cache Monitering. . Apart from that there seems to be no big significat difference in the application .
    Pls correct me , if I ma missing out something.
    Pls tell me if both hav the same functionality, why were these 2 functions made , any 1 of them, preferably Value Mappimg Function could hav been enough.
    Regards,
    Arnab.

    Hi
    Fixed value mapping is Message mapping Specific
    But Value mapping allows u to create a Schema and group .
    Value mapping functionality will be well understood in large integration where many mapping programs using same conversions.
    Maintain advantage is maintance is easy with value mapping because if any chnages in value , just ID change is enogh no need to go mapping but this is not with fixed value
    For instance if u r using Fixed value in 50 mapping programs u need to change in all
    But if u r using Value mapping just one ID
    Which one u prefer
    all based upon u r landscape for mapping
    Srini

  • Message Mapping - fixed values - not mapping

    Hi
    i have a simple fixed values mapping that is not producing anything.
    the input value can be 'Y' , 'N' , or a blank.
    The fixed value mapping is setting these input values to 'Yes', 'No', and 'No'
    however when i test this, nothing is getting mapped to the output record for this field.
    can someone tell me why?
    many thanks,
    Julia

    Hello,
    What happens when you use this logic?
    Source -> mapWithDefault: -> fixValues -> Target
    Configuration for fixValues would be:
    DefaultValue: No
    BehaviourLookUp: Use Default Value
    key             value
    Y                Yes
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

  • Value mapping with some return values

    Hi Experts,
        I  am facing value mapping problem.
    My requirment was My source elemnet having 4 value mapping(Key and Values)  and also if not passing that 4 keys also it will  display same thing in my reciver.
        Can Anybody please suggest me how can i handle this situvation.
    (01 02
      02 03
    04  05
    06   08)
    this are the value mapping  .out of this if iam passing any like(00  it will goes to dn field).This is my requirment.Can u please let me know  how can i handle tthis.

    Hi,
    For you Requirement Please use  USE key option.
    In graphical mapping when you will select valuemapping function then you can see the
    "Behaviour if lookup fails " option
    Double click on the value mapping function to see this options.
    There 3 options for lookup fails:
    1)USE KEY
    2)throw Exception
    3)Use default value
    you can select use key for your requirement.
    If you pass 00 as input to value mapping and it unable to find any value in value mapping for 00.
    then it will pass 00 to the targhet without any conversion(in case of use key option)
    If you pass 01 then it wiill do value mapping and send 02 to target.

  • How to create Value Mapping scheme

    I want to create a new scheme and agency pair which can be listed in Scheme Selection dialog.
    Open ID --> Tools --> Value Mapping --> Click input helper for Scheme --> Display the Scheme Selection dialog.
    I want to know, how to add on scheme and acgency pair in this dialog.

    Hi,
    Check this thread:
    Value mapping problem
    This is how u do it:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2a/9d2891cc976549a9ad9f81e9b8db25/content.htm
    /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/12/27/aspirant-to-learn-sap-xiyou-won-the-jackpot-if-you-read-this-part-iii Check the value mapping section.You have everything you need in that section.
    Regards,
    AKshay.
    reward points if find useful.
    Message was edited by:
            Akshay Jamgaonkar

  • IPhone 5 Map Problems & Deficiencys

    Does anyone know whether Apple can and/or will fix these map problems on the iPhone 5?

    Ya I'n not to impressed i'm in a rural area 5 miles out side of a major city in Canada, cant make out anything the roads around me are not even showing up on Hybrid anymore the screen is all Green, not even close to what Google was like and now I cannot get Google back after syncing in Itunes will Google come back as it has much better mapping. I have not upgraded my old phone which is a 3GS and will have to bring it along for mapping til this is fixed or google is back on iOS6.
    Here is a comparison on the same area. 1st picture is the new Apple map on my new iPhone 5 on iOS6 and the second is from Google on my old 3GS phone on 5.1.1
    Sorry for the picture quality bad lighting.

  • Value Mapping causing problems in Adapter Engine?

    Hello, I was hoping someone might be able to help me with a problem we are having in our XI system.  I created a new value mapping group that has N:1 values. There are about 80 different values that I convert to 1 value.  I have been using 1:1 value mappings successfully and I tested out the N:1 scenario just fine also.  However, at the time I activated this new value mapping group, all of my resulting messages in the adapter engine are being held in a status of 'To Be Delivered'.  There are no errors in the RWB and the BASIS admin cannot find any errors in the J2EE logs.  Does any one have any ideas on possible causes for this condition?

    This problem has been corrected by a restart of the J2EE engine.  Still not certain what the root cause was, but this is the second time a restart has fixed a problem coinciding with a value mapping group object activation.

Maybe you are looking for