Flashplugin freezing your system? Maybe it's not what it seems...

I'm posting this detective story in this subforum because the issue discussed seems to be happening mostly with laptops.
The symptoms:
You are happily surfing the internet with your laptop when you decide to watch a flash video. After some minutes, your nightmare begins: suddenly the video playback becomes choppy, your browser slows down and the whole system becomes painfully slow and unresponsive. You check cpu usage and it seems that both firefox and flashplugin are wreaking havoc. You close/kill the processes but to no avail. It seems as if flashplugin is haunting your laptop from beyond the grave, leaving you no other option but to reboot.
You then start a pilgrimage through Google and linux forums to seek a solution, but none of the answers provided  seem to fix this annoying behavior. It turns out that something more subtle is going on...
The real deal:
Flashplugin is not the cause of your problem, it's just the trigger. I came across this revelation while gzipping several dozens of big (4Gig+) files: exactly the same behavior emerged and flashplugin had nothing to do with it.
A hunch told me to check the cpu behaviour and after running "cpufreq-info" I find out the real problem:
analyzing CPU 1:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 800 MHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.20 GHz, 800 MHz
available cpufreq governors: ondemand, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 800 MHz.
The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 800 MHz.
Notice the cpu stuck at the lowest frequency?
It seems that there is some widespread problem in linux with some combinations of hardware and kernel/cpufreq-utils that causes the cpu-throtling to misbehave whenever the cpu is subject to some stress. As soon as the cpu usage goes 100% for some prolonged period of time, the cpu gets stuck at the the lowest frequency and any cpufreq command issued trying to fix it will be ignored by the system.
The solution:
Until this gets fixed in kernel26 and/or cpufreq-utils, there is a simple workaround to the problem:
Issuing the following command will ease the pain while your system is running:
echo 1 > /sys/module/processor/parameters/ignore_ppc
(You might need to restart whatever cpu-throttling daemon you are using, and you might also need to do some easy voodoo with cpufreq-set to reset the cpu maximum frequency and/or governor.)
To fix it permanently, add this boot parameter to your kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst :
processor.ignore_ppc=1
Final considerations:
While researching this problem in different forums, I found out that a lot of users are incorrectly blaming flashplugin and don't know what's really going on with their cpus. For average/everyday computer usage, flash video is probably the only thing that will subject the cpu to a 100% usage for enough time to trigger the problem; therefore causing the incorrect diagnostic and subsequent frustration.
I'm pretty sure that this is not a hardware problem, as it has been reported in different laptop models. Although it does seem to be more frequent in Dell laptops.
I know that my cpu-throtling used to be fine some time ago, I'm sure because is one of the first things I always make sure to set it up correctly the first time I install linux on a new laptop. Sadly, I can't pinpoint the exact version change of kernel26 and/or cpufreq-utils that started this whole mess. I took me quite time to narrow down the problem and rule out flashplugin or firefox as the causes.
If you check with Google, it seems that this issue is not only limited to Archlinux, several other distros are experiencing the same problem. For us, Archers, the bug (or something quite similar) is reported already here.
One final call: if you happen to suffer this issue and you thought it was a case of flashplugin misbehavior, please take some time to report or confirm the cpu-throttling bug. It seems to be really widespread but poorly reported, and without proper understanding of the large number of users suffering it, it will not be fixed as soon as is desirable.
Something related to cpu-throtling is awry in cpufreq-utils or kernel26 , and without your support it will pass unnoticed and blame will fall unto poor flashplugin.
Cheers

Thanks a lot for this detailled post. I already fixed the issue on my laptop in july, but it's good to spread the word.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • I getthe message Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system. It is NOT open I onlly have one computer

    I installed FF on my new computer, Windows 7 Toshiba, I get the message''' Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system'''. It is NOT open I only have one computer.
    I had a computer expert try everything and we cannot get it to open.

    Look for the firefox process firefox.exe and kill it with for instance task manager. it is also worth watching for plugincontainer.exe.
    The problem and solutions are explained in the articles:
    * [[firefox is already running but is not responding]]
    *[[firefox hangs]]

  • The plug-in for the selected item is not installed on your system

    Hello,
    When I want to build an application there is a "!" mark before the application and for  the Installer,  in the Project Explorer under Build Specification.
    When I ask for "explain warning" I got the message "The plug-in for the selected item is not installed on your system"
    Previously it worked well, whats happend?? (during my holyday's )
    Thanks for help, Huub

    Well, something obviously changed. Install any software and/or hardware recently? Using any hardware in your LabVIEW project? Could be the drivers for that hardware got corrupted. Try identifying what you're using and reinstall the drivers.

  • System update 4.0 not working from day one

    Can anyone help me with "An error occurred while gathering user information".
    TVSU was not working with factory installed version and it is not working with the newest version, always with the same error. I had a random shutdown & melted speaker problem with my T400s so resolving this issue was not my priority, now it is
    I have Windows 7 and TVSU 4.0.0024
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check the following registry keys (or similar)
    HKLM\HARDWARE\ACPI\DSDT\LENOVO\
    HKLM\HARDWARE\ACPI\FADT\LENOVO\
    HKLM\HARDWARE\ACPI\RSDT\LENOVO\
    They should be in the form of your model number without the hyphen and not TP-xx___
    An example would be: 8919Y16
    Also check following registy key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\System Update\Preferences\UCSettings\RunTime\MTM
    if it's showing your correct MTM number and under it also the NLSOS and the rest.
    Let me know if these reg keys are fine on your system
    <maybe a short reg export would be fine>
    Cheers

  • Glxinfo/glxgears freeze the system like hell

    I am running the latest updated Archlinux 64 bit box:
    [arnuld@gnu ~]$ pacman -Q mesa
    mesa 7.0.1-1
    [arnuld@gnu ~]$ pacman -Q xorg-server
    xorg-server 1.4-5
    I am using openchrome and X runs fine. NO freezes in normals runs but as soon as I type glxinfo or glxgears it freezes the system an I can not do anything. keyboard, mouse all stop responding as if my system is dead, the only solution is Manual Reset button on my cabinet.
    [arnuld@gnu ~]$ lspci
    00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:00.2 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:00.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:00.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:00.7 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
    00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800/K8T890 South]
    00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller (rev 80)
    00:0f.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
    00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81)
    00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81)
    00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81)
    00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81)
    00:10.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 86)
    00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South]
    00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60)
    00:11.6 Communication controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 80)
    00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 78)
    00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration
    00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map
    00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller
    00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control
    01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. S3 Unichrome Pro VGA Adapter (rev 01)
    [arnuld@gnu ~]$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dri"
    Load "glx"
    Load "record"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "xtrap"
    Load "freetype"
    Load "type1"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    HorizSync 30 - 70
    VertRefresh 50 - 160
    Option "DPMS"
    DisplaySize 269 201 # 96 DPI @ 1024x768
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "PrintVGARegs" # [<bool>]
    #Option "PrintTVRegs" # [<bool>]
    #Option "I2CScan" # [<bool>]
    #Option "VBEModes" # [<bool>]
    #Option "NoAccel" # [<bool>]
    #Option "AccelMethod" # <str>
    #Option "ExaNoComposite" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ExaScratchSize" # <i>
    #Option "HWCursor" # [<bool>]
    #Option "SWCursor" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "Rotate" # [<str>]
    #Option "VideoRAM" # <i>
    #Option "ActiveDevice" # [<str>]
    #Option "BusWidth" # [<str>]
    #Option "Center" # [<bool>]
    #Option "PanelSize" # [<str>]
    #Option "ForcePanel" # [<bool>]
    #Option "TVDotCrawl" # [<bool>]
    #Option "TVDeflicker" # <i>
    #Option "TVProgressive" # [<bool>]
    #Option "TVType" # [<str>]
    #Option "TVOutput" # [<str>]
    #Option "DisableVQ" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DisableIRQ" # [<bool>]
    #Option "EnableAGPDMA" # [<bool>]
    #Option "NoAGPFor2D" # [<bool>]
    #Option "NoXVDMA" # [<bool>]
    #Option "VbeSaveRestore" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DisableXvBWCheck" # [<bool>]
    #Option "MaxDRIMem" # <i>
    #Option "AGPMem" # <i>
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "via"
    VendorName "Unknown Vendor"
    BoardName "Unknown Board"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    Modes "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "DRI"
    Mode 0666
    EndSection
    [arnuld@gnu ~]$
    I found one other thread with the same problem as mine but nobody replied to his 2nd question:
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39667
    BTW, just out of curiosity , I only watch Bruce Lee's movies and do internet. I do not play games etc. So, is there any use of DRI for me ?

    Welcome to the world of Unichrome. Via's integrated graphics chips open gl support in Linux is very poor. I have KM400 and I got GL working with it somehow. When libgl was updated to version 7.0.1 in extra-repo installing it broke the opengl on my system. X simply locked up when ever I tried to start any opengl software. I found from the openchrome.org:
    "The 3D driver that complements the openchrome driver can be obtained from the DRI project. For now you should use the Mesa-6.4 branch; the last version known to work sort of reliably is Mesa-6.4.1."
    I built libgl, unichrome-dri and mesa -packages with ABS from Mesa-6.4.1-branch and installed latest openchrome -driver from svn. Now opengl with my unichrome chip works pretty "stable". Of course it can't run the latest opengl -stuff but atleast I can run Blender with my laptop.

  • The maximum report processing jobs limit configured by your system ...

    Hi,
    I'm a developer with WXP, VS2003 and CR2008, Framework 1.1.
    I have a message from my server (W2003): "The maximum report processing jobs limit configured by your system administrator has been reached":
    What's the matter?
    The server has installed redistributable of CR2008.
    Thanks.

    I solved it in Page Unload, doin' this:
    private void printReports_Unload(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
                    CrystalReportViewer1.Dispose();
                    CrystalReportViewer1 = null;
         if((reportDocument1 != null) && (reportDocument1.IsLoaded))
              reportDocument1.Close();
              reportDocument1.Dispose();
    Then, I stressed webapp with WAPT 4.0, and everything works perfect.
    Do you advise me to change too keyreg?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Santiago Magaña on Nov 3, 2008 9:47 AM

  • Downloaded version 10, when I log on it wants to restart all the time. It has shut down and restarted at least 10 times and the same message still comes up "Your system has to be rebooted." and when you do the same message comes up?

    Cannot logon to Firefox now that version 10 has been installed. I cannot even delete the program from my system. To delete it gives the same message "Your system has to be rebooted" What is going on?

    Hi Cot230tage,
    Usually the only reason it will ask you to reboot is if there is a file that must be modified that the updater doesn't currently have access to. You should try running the Firefox program once as Administrator:
    * Right-click the icon and choose ''Run as Administrator''
    If that doesn't help then do a clean reinstall.
    # Download a fresh copy of Firefox from the [http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/fx/ Mozilla download page] and save the file to the desktop.
    # [[Uninstalling Firefox|Uninstall]] your current version of Firefox and remove the Firefox program folder before running the new installer.
    # Run installer
    Remember that you don't want to remove personal data when uninstalling. That way you'll still have your personal information.
    Hopefully this helps!

  • Where to "Edit Your System Settings"?

    The update tab of the portal page says:
    Updates
    From this page you can view all of the different types of updates available for your systems by ID, name, type, how many systems would be affected and by the date the update was released. If you want to view the current baseline, go to "Edit Your System Settings."
    But I don't see an "Edit Your System Settings." option. What am I missing?
    Cheers,
    Rich Whiffen

    Hi Rich,
    Thank you for pointing out this issue and posting the location (and path allowing) for Editting System Settings. A Change Request was filed and completed to resolve the issue of wording on the Updates Page.
    Thank You,
    William Brower

  • I've updated my Macbook Pro and my iMac with Maverick, updating the various apps. On my Macbook, everything functions perfectly. On my iMac, I get the Your System has Run out of Application Memory, and it's based our Mail, the only app not updated. Ideas?

    Maverick and Your System message
    I've updated my Macbook Pro and my iMac with Maverick, updating the various apps (Pages, Aperture, iPhoto, Numbers & iMovie, too) in the process.
    On my Macbook, everything functions perfectly. On my iMac, I get the Your System has Run out of Application Memory message. But it's not Calendar, it's Mail that not only won't open, but when it does now, it takes the entire system out with it.
    I open Safari, and it works. I open Firefox, and it works and Safari still works. I open Calendar and it works, Safari and Firefox continue to work. I open Reminders, and everything still works.
    I open Aperture, and it opens Finder instead, showing the 3.5 update that was installed two days ago (and Aperture has functioned), but doesn't seem to update the app; after about 20 seconds the update disappears and I can now open Aperture and it shows I'm now opening the updated Aperture, which it didn't show before.
    I click on Mail, and the cursor spins for ten minutes. The mail window finally opens, but the cursor spins and does not connect to upload new mail, and I finally Force Quit Mail. Since the Maverick update, even though Mail was not updated (and maybe because Mail was not updated), I have been able to receive emails twice, and then the program crashed.
    Besides the Aperture app, Pages didn't fully update on the iMac, and I had to remove the old Pages icon from the dock after the new program loaded up from Applications.
    Any ideas?

    Maverick and Your System message
    I've updated my Macbook Pro and my iMac with Maverick, updating the various apps (Pages, Aperture, iPhoto, Numbers & iMovie, too) in the process.
    On my Macbook, everything functions perfectly. On my iMac, I get the Your System has Run out of Application Memory message. But it's not Calendar, it's Mail that not only won't open, but when it does now, it takes the entire system out with it.
    I open Safari, and it works. I open Firefox, and it works and Safari still works. I open Calendar and it works, Safari and Firefox continue to work. I open Reminders, and everything still works.
    I open Aperture, and it opens Finder instead, showing the 3.5 update that was installed two days ago (and Aperture has functioned), but doesn't seem to update the app; after about 20 seconds the update disappears and I can now open Aperture and it shows I'm now opening the updated Aperture, which it didn't show before.
    I click on Mail, and the cursor spins for ten minutes. The mail window finally opens, but the cursor spins and does not connect to upload new mail, and I finally Force Quit Mail. Since the Maverick update, even though Mail was not updated (and maybe because Mail was not updated), I have been able to receive emails twice, and then the program crashed.
    Besides the Aperture app, Pages didn't fully update on the iMac, and I had to remove the old Pages icon from the dock after the new program loaded up from Applications.
    Any ideas?

  • Firefox is OPEN and working fine, but when I click a link in Thunderbird I get 'Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system.'

    If I click a link on my desktop or in any other program (while Firefox is open and running), I get this message: "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system." There's about a billion links for this if you Google it, but they all say that Firefox wasn't shut down properly. (OK, maybe not ALL of them, but if the needle is in that haystack, I haven't yet found it.) That's not the issue in my case since I haven't shut FF down at all.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == IDK

    This began to happen to me when I tried to run two separate profiles simultaneously on the same installation of firefox with -no-remote

  • Sometimes when I close Firefox and try to open it in few moments it shows me message "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system." However, I haven't o

    Sometimes when I close Firefox and try to open it in few moments it shows me message "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system." However, I haven't opened any additional Firefox related programs, and previous Firefox is closed. First I though it is because of my computer, but then I discovered that other people have the same problem as well
    == This happened ==
    A few times a week
    == some 2 month ago ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)

    Hi Andis.
    First of all, this is completely normal behavior, although it's a bit irritating, I know. What happens is that when you close Firefox, despite the window disappearing right there and then, Firefox keeps running for a little bit until the whole closing procedure is completed. This can take a fraction of a second on fast computers, or can take a few seconds on slow computers or when Firefox is storing a large session (if you save your tabs). All you have to do is wait a bit until Firefox closes, and then open it again.
    To see if it's still running, you can press CTRL+SHIFT+ESC and then, under the Processes tab, you can see if firefox.exe is still there. If it's taking an unusual amount of time to close (which happens very rarely, and only if the browser freezes on exit), you can force the application to terminate from this application (task manager).
    Firefox 4.0 will reduce by 97% the time it takes firefox.exe to close, so this problem will be basically erased for Firefox's next version.
    Until then, I can recommend you this extension, which helps you restart your browser more easily and without bothering about closing times:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3559/
    Hopefully this will help.

  • Using Windows 8.1 with Directx11, when I lauch Photoshop Elements Organizer, I see the error message "DirectX could not be initialized. Please be sure that it is installed on your system. You can download the latest DirectX installer from:[URL] I have the

    Using Windows 8.1 with Directx11, when I lauch Photoshop Elements 12 Organizer, I see the error message "DirectX could not be initialized. Please be sure that it is installed on your system. You can download the latest DirectX installer from:[URL] I have the latest version, Directx11, as verified by running dxdiag.

    Maybe you need to enable Direct Play under Legacy Components in the Turn Windows Features on or off dialog.
    1. Right click on the windows start Logo on the taskbar, select Control Panel and click on Programs
    2. Under Programs and Features click on Turn Windows Features on or off and then under Legacy Components enable Direct Play

  • Getting error while opening a saved for later notification: The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security. Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action.

    Hi All,
    While opening a saved for later notification, we are getting "The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security. Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action". error.
    This is a custom notification.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Raghava

    HI All,
    Please help on this issue.
    Thanks
    Raghava

  • I want update firmware 2.9 but apear this message "This software is not supported on your system."

    hi
    I want update firmware .details my system is
    Hardware Overview:
      Model Name:          MacBook Pro
      Model Identifier:          MacBookPro9,2
      Processor Name:          Intel Core i5
      Processor Speed:          2.5 GHz
      Number of Processors:          1
      Total Number of Cores:          2
      L2 Cache (per Core):          256 KB
      L3 Cache:          3 MB
      Memory:          4 GB
      Boot ROM Version:          MBP91.00D3.B08
      SMC Version (system):          2.2f38
      Serial Number (system):          C1MHQC17DTY3
      Hardware UUID:          EF0C6F81-20AD-50FA-9DD5-C8E084DF8E8C
      Sudden Motion Sensor:
      State:          Enabled
    but when install the last update MacBookProEFIUpdate2.9 i got error like this
    "This software is not supported on your system."
    please help me thanks

    OK, so the firmware is the same as mine, and yet Apple Support offered this EFI and SMC update packages, which should give a message that our computers are updated. 
      However, the update packages fail to run. 
      Did Apple neglect to give the correct update for the mid-2012 issue of MacBook Pro 13-inch?  I have the i7 Intel processor, instead of the i5, and I was sold this unit as having two processors, but the System info only lists a single processor. 
    Is one of the problems with Intel-based MacBook Pro units that the integration wasn't without bugs that cause processor hang when running the OS Lion, even with updates to 10.7.5?
      Shouldn't the EFI and SMC updaters run on these machines as stated in the Apple Support article? 
      What will Apple do for these customers?

  • HT1237 My MacBookPro9,2 gets error message: "This software is not supported on your system." Audio jack is ignored. What else can I do?

    MACBOOK Pro 13-inch Mid 2012
    2.9GHz Intel Core i7
    8GB 1600 MHz DDR3
    Intel HD Graphics 40000 512 MB
    Mac OS X Lion 10..5 (11G63)
    Model Identifier:                    MacBookPro9,2
    Boot ROM Version:          MBP91.00D3.B08
    SMC Version (system):          2.2f44
    Passed Last Power on Self-Test
    The MacBook EFI Updater File that I downloaded from the Apple website for Support:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1237
      --> shows my Model McBookPro 9,2 as needing
    EFI Boot ROM version MBP91.00D3.B08 (EFI 2.9) (http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1593)
    SMC version 2.2f44 (SMC 1.8) (http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1633)
    I downloaded and tried to run both the files
    MacBookProEFIUpdate2.9.dmg 9/19/12
    AND
    MacBookProSMCUpdate.pkg
    as offered on this matrix, which instructs:
    "This article lists firmware updates that were released for Intel-based Macs. They update the firmware that originally shipped from the factory. If your computer does not appear on this list, an update from the factory firmware is not necessary.
    If you are unsure whether your computer needs a particular update, simply download and open the update installer. The installer will alert you if the firmware update is already installed or not needed."
    and instead of a message telling me of the proper update
    "This software is not supported on your system."
    So, why would the manual updater not tell me I already have the proper SMC and EFI updates?
    What is the reason I get the message that the software I downloaded from Apple Support is not supported on my system?
    Is this indicative of a larger problem with my MACBOOK PRO? 

    [email protected],
    why were you trying to reïnstall the Boot ROM and SMC versions that were already installed on your MacBook Pro?
    I agree that  a “not supported” message is certainly less clear than an “already installed” message would have been.

Maybe you are looking for