Flatten a hierarchy

I'm trying to flatten a hierarchy. I have a table with a parent/child relationship in the following order
Parent_ID Child_ID
1234 1234
1234 1235
1235 1236....etc
I would like to transform the hierarchy to
1234 , 1235, 1236
If I use a sys_connect_by I get
1234;
1234;1235
1235;1235;1236
Thanks
Khetani

Starting from Oracle 10 you can use CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF operator to filter out unwanted rows:
WITH HIERARCHY AS (
  SELECT LEVEL + 1233 PARENT_ID, LEVEL + 1233 + 1 CHILD_ID
  FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL < 6
SELECT SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH( PARENT_ID, ';') PARENT_ID
FROM HIERARCHY
WHERE CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1
START WITH PARENT_ID = 1234
CONNECT BY PRIOR CHILD_ID = PARENT_ID;
PARENT_ID
;1234;1235;1236;1237;1238

Similar Messages

  • How to write SQL query to flatten the hierarchy

    Hi,
    I have person table which has recursive hierarchy and I wish to flatten it upto 5 levels.
    I am using Oracle10g and I have written following query to flatten the hierarchy
    SELECT
    ID,
    level lvl,
    REGEXP_SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (fname||' '||lname, '/'), '[^/]+', 1, 1) AS level_1,
    REGEXP_SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (fname||' '||lname, '/'), '[^/]+', 1, 2) AS level_2,
    REGEXP_SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (fname||' '||lname, '/'), '[^/]+', 1, 3) AS level_3,
    REGEXP_SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (fname||' '||lname, '/'), '[^/]+', 1, 4) AS level_4,
    REGEXP_SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (fname||' '||lname, '/'), '[^/]+', 1, 5) AS level_5
    FROM cmt_person
    CONNECT BY manager_id = PRIOR id
    and level<=5
    The person table have more than a million records.
    Here I am getting the correct output but this query is taking a lot of time to run.
    I am looking at a SQL query without use of connect by to get the required output.
    To recreate the issue, you can use this query in HR schema of Oracle and use Employees table.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Raghvendra

    I tried to rewrite the query without using regular expression and connect by. Here is the code:
    SELECT
    cmt_person.id ,
    cmt_person.fname as mgr1,
    case when cmt_person2.manager_id=cmt_person.id then (cmt_person2.fname ) end as mgr2,
    case when cmt_person3.manager_id=cmt_person2.id then (cmt_person3.fname ) end as mgr3,
    case when cmt_person4.manager_id=cmt_person3.id then cmt_person4.fname end as mgr4,
    case when cmt_person5.manager_id=cmt_person4.id then cmt_person5.fname end as mgr5
    FROM
    cmt_person,
    cmt_person cmt_person2,
    cmt_person cmt_person3,
    cmt_person cmt_person4,
    cmt_person cmt_person5
    WHERE
    cmt_person2.manager_id(+)=cmt_person.id and
    cmt_person3.manager_id(+)=cmt_person2.id and
    cmt_person4.manager_id(+)=cmt_person3.id and
    cmt_person5.manager_id(+)=cmt_person4.id
    order by 2,3,4
    I got following output:
    emplo000000000200100     Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Rajesh     
    emplo000000000200099     Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Ajay     
    emplo000000000200101     Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Swati     
    emplo000000000200320     Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Jinesh     
    emplo000000000201231     Bobby     Khasha     Test123          
    emplo000000000201230     Bobby     Khasha     User1_Domain          
    emplo000000000201227     Bobby     Khasha     User1_World          
    emplo000000000200104     Bobby     Khasha     Yitzik     Natalia     
    emplo000000000200103     Bobby     Khasha     Yitzik     Andrew     
    total 9 rows
    But this is partially correct output. I want output like this:
    emplo000000000200097          Bobby                    
    emplo000000000200087          Bobby     Khasha               
    emplo000000000200102          Bobby     Khasha     Yitzik          
    emplo000000000200103          Bobby     Khasha     Yitzik     Andrew     
    emplo000000000200104          Bobby     Khasha     Yitzik      Natalia     
    emplo000000000201227          Bobby     Khasha     User1_World          
    emplo000000000201231          Bobby     Khasha     Test123          
    emplo000000000201230          Bobby     Khasha     User1_Domain          
    emplo000000000200098          Bobby     Khasha     Rahul          
    emplo000000000200099          Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Ajay     
    emplo000000000200100          Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Rajesh     
    emplo000000000200320          Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Jinesh     
    emplo000000000200101          Bobby     Khasha     Rahul     Swati     
    total 13 rows
    Do you know what I should do to get this output.
    Thanks,
    Raghvendra

  • Flatten family hierarchy to level 2, level 3, level 4 across

    For example....
                         Family Hierarchy
                          Grandma 1
                                  Mom 1
                                     daughter 1
                                        Grand daughter 1
                                                 Great Grand daughter 1
    How do you flatten this one Field to say
    Grandma    Mom   Daughter      
    Grandma 1 Mom1 Daughter 1 ect.... across the top
    Do you create a selection in the row pane or a formula for the same field several times? Thanks!!!!

    Hello Experts,
    I am also facing the same issue.I want to get  a flat file output from BW system which
    includes the hierarchy fields from 2 different hierarchies as columns  of flat file with some other fields.
    Is there any way to do this ?
    Regards,
    Vikas Arya

  • How to flatten keyword hierarchy?

    For about a year I had all my keywords organized into a nice hierarchy, but after moving projects between libraries and computers my keywords are in chaos because keyword hierarchy information is not included in exported projects. I have keywords repeated with one nested in a folder and its copy sitting at the top level (with photos assigned to both).
    After seeing what a mess moving projects causes, I'd like to eliminate the hierarchies and just keep a flat list. Does anyone know of a way to flatten the structure without having to drag each keyword out of its folder? I tried deleting the Keywords.plist file, but it gets rebuilt with the hierarchy intact. Any help is appreciated!

    One thing that might be a factor is the way Aperture keeps keywords active even if you move or delete them in the keywords list.
    In order to have control over your keyword list, you need to delete existing keywords from your images. As Steve Weller points out in his articles, Aperture keeps keyword information in several places, not just the keyword list, and you need to deal with all of the places in order to control the hierarchy of the keyword list. For example, if you have set up custom keyword buttons, they store the keyword in the hierarchy of the time the button was created, so each time you use the button, you are making Aperture "remember" the hierarchy, even if you have later moved the keyword.
    But your issue is that you have many images using keywords. When a keyword is used in an image, it is stored with the image; Aperture remembers the hierarchy of the keyword. This means that if you later move that keyword in the keyword list, Aperture considers the moved keyword to be separate and independent of the keyword previously used with an image. You can see this in the smart album display of keywords, which is based on actually used keywords. If you are having this problem, then keywords will appear more than once in the smart album keyword list. If you want to keep the same spelling of a keyword that has been moved in the keyword list, the only solution I know of is, frankly, a bit tedious:
    1. use the smart album to select all images using the unwanted version of the keyword
    2. then assign an "intermediate" (not identically spelled) keyword to those images,
    3. then delete the unwanted version of the keyword from the images (use the keyword field in the control bar; option-tilde or click on the field, then type the name of the unwanted keyword, then shift-return to delete the keyword)
    4. then assign the new version of the keyword to the images
    5. then delete the intermediate keyword
    Good luck!

  • Flattening the hierarchial data

    Hi,
    I have the data in this format
    ID        NAME         ParentID
    CV1      CV1NAME      CV
    CVX1    CVX1NAME    CV1
    CVXX1  CVXX1NAME  CVX1
    CV2      CV2NAME     CV
    CVX2    CVX2NAME    CV2
    CVXX2  CVXX2NAME  CVX2
    How can i flatten this data into this format
    CVID    CVNAME     CVXID   CVXNAME   CVXXID   CVXXNAME
    cv1        cv1name  cvx1        cvx1name    cvxx1     cvxx1name
    cv2        cv2name  cvx2        cvx2name    cvxx2     cvxx2name

    DECLARE @table TABLE (ID varchar(10), NAME varchar(20), ParentID varchar(10))
    INSERT INTO @table (ID, NAME, ParentID) VALUES
    ('CV1', 'CV1NAME', 'CV'),
    ('CVX1', 'CVX1NAME', 'CV1'),
    ('CVXX1', 'CVXX1NAME', 'CVX1'),
    ('CV2', 'CV2NAME', 'CV'),
    ('CVX2', 'CVX2NAME', 'CV2'),
    ('CVXX2', 'CVXX2NAME', 'CVX2')
    SELECT
    t0.ID AS CVID,
    t0.NAME AS CVNAME,
    t1.ID AS CVXID,
    t1.NAME AS CVXNAME,
    t2.ID AS CVXXID,
    t2.NAME AS CVXXNAME
    FROM
    SELECT ID, NAME, RIGHT(ID, 1) AS Num
    FROM @table
    WHERE ID LIKE 'CV[1-9]'
    ) AS t0
    FULL JOIN
    SELECT ID, NAME, RIGHT(ID, 1) AS Num
    FROM @table
    WHERE ID LIKE 'CVX[1-9]'
    ) AS t1 ON t1.Num = t0.Num
    FULL JOIN
    SELECT ID, NAME, RIGHT(ID, 1) AS Num
    FROM @table
    WHERE ID LIKE 'CVXX[1-9]'
    ) AS t2 ON t2.Num = t0.Num
    A Fan of SSIS, SSRS and SSAS

  • Parent-Child Ragged hierarchy

    Hi
    I have a parent child ragged hisrarchy. I want to build level wise dimension to be able to report using crystal .
    The PC table I have is like
    Child     Parent
    A11      A1
    A12      A1
    A111    A11
    A112    A11
    A113    A11
    A121    A12
    A122    A12
    A1121  A112
    A1221  A122
    A1222  A122
    I want to solve this as a level based hierarchy using universe like:
    LEV1 LEV2 LEV3 LEV4
    A1 A12 A122 A1222
    A1 A12 A122 A1221
    A1 A11 A112 A1121
    A1 A12 A122
    A1 A12 A121
    A1 A11 A113
    A1 A11 A112
    A1 A11 A111
    A1 A12
    A1 A11
    Can somebody please put some light on this how can I achieve this?
    Thanks
    Atul

    Hi Atul,
    You can use a Derived Table that flatten the hierarchy.
    Here is a sample based on the example you provided, you just have to replace "child", "parent" and "myTable" strings by the corrseponding column and table names:
    SELECT DISTINCT
         Z.child,
         A.parent_1,
         A.child_1,
         A.parent_2,
         A.child_2,
         A.parent_3,
         A.child_3,
         Z.parent AS parent_4,
         Z.child AS child_4
    FROM myTable Z,
         SELECT DISTINCT
              A.parent_1,
              A.child_1,
              A.parent_2,
              A.child_2,
              Z.parent AS parent_3,
              Z.child AS child_3
         FROM myTable Z,
              SELECT DISTINCT
                   A.parent_1,
                   A.child_1,
                   Z.parent AS parent_2,
                   Z.child AS child_2
              FROM myTable Z,
                   SELECT DISTINCT
                        parent AS parent_1,
                        child AS child_1
                    FROM myTable
                    WHERE parent = 0 OR parent IS NULL
              ) A
              WHERE A.child_1 = Z.parent
         ) A
         WHERE A.child_2 = Z.parent
    ) A
    WHERE A.child_3 = Z.parent
    UNION
    SELECT DISTINCT
         A.child_3 AS child,
         A.parent_1,
         A.child_1,
         A.parent_2,
         A.child_2,
         A.parent_3,
         A.child_3,
         NULL AS parent_4,
         NULL AS child_4
    FROM myTable Z,
         SELECT DISTINCT
              A.parent_1,
              A.child_1,
              A.parent_2,
              A.child_2,
              Z.parent AS parent_3,
              Z.child AS child_3
         FROM myTable Z,
              SELECT DISTINCT
                   A.parent_1,
                   A.child_1,
                   Z.parent AS parent_2,
                   Z.child AS child_2
              FROM myTable Z,
                   SELECT DISTINCT
                        parent AS parent_1,
                        child AS child_1
                    FROM myTable
                    WHERE parent = 0 OR parent IS NULL
              ) A
              WHERE A.child_1 = Z.parent
         ) A
         WHERE A.child_2 = Z.parent
    ) A
    WHERE A.child_3 NOT IN (SELECT parent FROM myTable)
    UNION
    SELECT DISTINCT
         A.child_2 AS child,
         A.parent_1,
         A.child_1,
         A.parent_2,
         A.child_2,
         NULL AS parent_3,
         NULL AS child_3,
         NULL AS parent_4,
         NULL AS child_4
    FROM myTable Z,
         SELECT DISTINCT
              A.parent_1,
              A.child_1,
              Z.parent AS parent_2,
              Z.child AS child_2
         FROM myTable Z,
              SELECT DISTINCT
                   parent AS parent_1,
                   child AS child_1
               FROM myTable
               WHERE parent = 0 OR parent IS NULL
         ) A
         WHERE A.child_1 = Z.parent
    ) A
    WHERE A.child_2 NOT IN (SELECT parent FROM myTable)
    UNION
    SELECT DISTINCT
         A.child_1 AS child,
         A.parent_1,
         A.child_1,
         NULL AS parent_2,
         NULL AS child_2,
         NULL AS parent_3,
         NULL AS child_3,
         NULL AS parent_4,
         NULL AS child_4
    FROM myTable Z,
         SELECT DISTINCT
              parent AS parent_1,
              child AS child_1
          FROM myTable
          WHERE parent = 0 OR parent IS NULL
    ) A
    WHERE A.child_1 NOT IN (SELECT parent FROM myTable)
    Regards,
    Didier

  • BW upgrade EHP1, data uploads should stop?

    Dear experts,
    we have plan for system upgrade. current system is BW 7.0 sp 17, Now planned for EHP1 and SP9.
    I know the there some post upgrade activities, which include consistancy check for objects (infoobject, transfer rules, cubes,dso, etc...)
    Could some one pls confirm, do we need to stop the data uploads/stop process chains during system upgrade?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best Regards,
    Mannu

    Hi Ingo,
    RSRT was giving proper results. We have now implemented few SAP notes and the issues got resolved.
    The following are the notes:
    1499233 - MDX:bXML flattening, unbalanced hierarchy, empty columns
    1485648 - MDX: bXML flattening and hierarchies and displaced columns
    1446245 - MDX: Error when RSR_MDX_BXML_GET_GZIP_DATA is called
    1441767 - MDX: No data for bXML if only ALL member is requested
    1438091 - MDX: basXML: Object MEASURE 0 not found
    1435844 - MDX:Wrong no. decimal places for basXML flattening interface
    1432162 - MDX: Flattening problems when using hierarchies
    1420169 - MDX: bXML flattening: Subsequent note
    1411491 - MDX: bXML flattening in transac. MDXTEST: Selecting packages
    1404328 - MDX: bXML flattening and PROPERTIES: Columns overwritten
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Regards,
    shesha.

  • Changing into parent-child relation

    Hi,
    I have a table which has the following fields and the table gives the identifier for parent-child relation:
    ID
    PARENT ID
    structure
    parentkey_field
    foreignkey_field
    Fields[]
    data[]
    1.ID is the numbering like 1,2,3...
    2.PARENT ID will give the relation like which structure is the child for which   structure.
      Example: I have two structures HEADER and ITEM.Then the IDs will be 1 and 2.The parent id for ITEM will be 1(ID OF HEADER).
    3.Structure is the header/item structure names.
    4.parentkey_field and foreignkey_field are defining the header-child relation identifier fields.
    5.fields[] is the table with all the fields of header and item.
    6.DATA[] is the table having the data of header/item fields.
    Now my requirement is to flatten this table into one more table(with field structure_name,fieldname,value) with parent-child relation.
    Can anyone suggest something.

    It would be better if you posted the code you tried first and then having others help you with what's wrong.  Flattening a hierarchy is not that difficult; why don't you give it a shot first?

  • Value based hierarchies, Skip Level Hierarchies

    Hello,
    I need to create hierarchy based on column value , Please give me some details on implementing value based hierarchies and skip level hierarchies in obiee 10.1.3.
    Thank you

    With 10.3 i do not think we have a inbuilt solution to build value based hierarchies, you have to flatten the hierarchy and build a level based hierarchy.
    OBIEE 11g has value based hierarchies feature.
    refer this one for 11g.
    http://sandybi.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/hierarchies-in-obiee-11g-part-1/
    - Madan
    Edited by: Madan Thota on Sep 14, 2010 11:15 AM

  • Sort by Name in style palettes (INDD CS3)

    Every time I add new styles to the Paragraph, Character, or Object styles palettes, I have to manually re-set the display to 'Sort by Name'. This was never necessary in CS2. Is there any way to set this as a default in CS3?

    It would be fine to have them be unsorted by default as long as there was a way to sticky toggle sorting on for those that prefer to work the old way. IMHO, the new folder system is something of an accident waiting to happen too if you don't set up for it from the very beginning.
    - Each folder is independent of every other folder or the top level, meaning you can have an "H1" head style in each folder and all of them be defined differently.
    - If you started with a flat hierarchy from CS2 imported into CS3, you can rapidly get your CS3 working documents into a hozed state if you aren't aware of the first point. If you organize your styles into folders, but then open an old CS2 document again and copy stuff across from it, CS3 will see that the old style(s) associated with whatever you copy don't exist at the top level (eg you copied them all into the Chapter Opener sub-folder) and it will then re-import the styles back into the top level again, which means that you now have your original CS3 stuff linked to a style in a subfolder and the stuff you just copied in linked to a similar style at the top level.
    Until you do some clean-up and figure out which style is supposed to replace over which, you can no longer rely on all your styled text being the same or on all your styled text changing when you change a style.
    - IIRC, there is no easy way to flatten the hierarchy, such that you can tell if you have duplicate names in various subfolders, which means that it's fairly incompatible with export to INX back to CS2. (I have a vague recollection of doing this experiment, but I could be wrong on this point.)

  • ORA-19279

    I have written the following SQL to get all the child names:
    WITH xml_table AS
    (SELECT xmltype('
    <root>
    <child name="name1">
    <grandchild name="name11">
    <greatgrandchild name="name111"/>
    <greatgrandchild name="name112"/>
    </grandchild>
    <grandchild name="name12"/>
    </child>
    <child name="name2">
    <grandchild name="name21"/>
    <grandchild name="name22"/>
    </child>
    </root>') object_value FROM dual)
    select po.*
    from xml_table p,
    xmltable('/root' passing p.object_value columns child varchar2(100) path 'child/@name') po;
    I understand there are multiple "child" nodes under "root". So how to list them?
    I want to store all the "child" names in one table, "child" nodes and their "grandchild" in another table, "grandchild" and "greatgrandchild" in another table. What should be SQLs?

    Here's how you can "flatten" the hierarchy, it should give you some pointers to achieve your requirement :
    WITH xml_table AS (
    SELECT xmltype(
    '<root>
    <child name="name1">
    <grandchild name="name11">
    <greatgrandchild name="name111"/>
    <greatgrandchild name="name112"/>
    </grandchild>
    <grandchild name="name12"/>
    </child>
    <child name="name2">
    <grandchild name="name21"/>
    <grandchild name="name22"/>
    </child>
    </root>'
    ) object_value
    FROM dual
    SELECT po1.child,
           po2.grandchild,
           po3.greatgrandchild
    FROM xml_table p,
         XMLTable(
          '/root/child'
          passing p.object_value
          columns
           child  varchar2(100) path '@name',
           childs xmltype       path '.'
         ) po1,
         XMLTable(
          '/child/grandchild'
          passing po1.childs
          columns
           grandchild  varchar2(100) path '@name',
           grandchilds xmltype       path '.'
         ) (+) po2,
         XMLTable(
          '/grandchild/greatgrandchild'
          passing po2.grandchilds
          columns
           greatgrandchild  varchar2(100) path '@name'
         ) (+) po3
    ;To deal with missing descendants, note the use of the outer join with the last two XMLTABLEs.

  • Drill Down in OBIEE

    Hi, I defined dimensional hierarchy of 6 levels in Repository from a table.
    I have a flat table in database which represents the hierarchy and is as below:
    some levels have no sublevels and some have. the max levels is five, lets say.
    When a level has no sub level, there is null value in the field.
    level 1 is top most and level 5 being the lowest level. as below:
    http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/2531/29116555.jpg
    I have one more table, where I have employee name, employee number. I joined these two tables and
    I made a dimensional hierarchy combining these two tables.
    In the report, I must see, employee details as child to the last existing level.
    So I included employee name as detail for that hierarchy.
    Now my problem is,
    Ifthere is no sub level for particular level, it is noted as null in the table, so I should see employee name after that level.
    That is, when a level is ended, and has no more further levels, it should display employee name as its child level and followed by measure value for that.
    For example, in the report, I have to see as:
    http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/5760/43637216.jpg
    When I drill A, it should show me levels, a,b,c,d,empname
    when I again click c, since c has no sub levels, it should retrieve employee name as drilldown.
    Hope I am clear. I am not able to implement this,
    Please help me.

    Your describing a ragged hiearchy that is not supported out of the box in OBIEE 10G
    Your options :
    1) Flatten the hierarchy as part of your ETL process, your level 2 'c' would be populated all the way down the hierarchy, no big deal really, just more columns in the report until you get to Employee Name + Number or whatever you have on your detail / leaf level.
    2) use an nvl() function of whatever your source db supports and return a 'no child' or similar value literal string, at least the users will know they hit the bottom of the real data (level 2 in this case) and are now drilling through to the detail level. You could get clever and use a case statement on the value and offer some form of GOURL to another report to stop this drilling (but it wont give you drill in place on the dashboard, it will be a new window)
    3) 11G is out as of yesterday, I think this supports ragged hierarchies now does it not ? I've not had a proper play yet, my colleague has been beta testing but some of us have to bill proper days ;-)

  • Calculating DIrect and indirect reports for managers

    Hi,
    I have a flattened manager hierarchy. I want to calculate the direct and indirect reports for every manager. how can i do this.
    Thanks
    Edited by: user599926 on Apr 18, 2010 4:01 PM

    I've never worked with Access as a database, before.  But, if this were SQL (and it might work), then, yes, a LEFT OUTER JOIN would do the trick.
    SELECT ta.Lastname, ta.Firstname, ta.EmpID, ta.MgrEmpID, ta.Email, ta.Location
    FROM TableA ta LEFT OUTER JOIN TableA tb ON tb.MgrEmpID = ta.EmpID
    ORDER BY ta.Lastname, ta.Firstname, tb.Lastname, tb.FIrstname
    Or something like that.
    ^_^

  • Flattened to Parent Child Hierarchy

    Hi,
    My client has a little different requirement from normal.
    We want to convert the flattened version of hierarchy to parent child format. Does anyone have any sql script or idea how we can achieve this quickly?
    Thanks in advance.

    http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/06/21/obiee-data-modeling-tips-3-ragged-hierarchies/
    might be helpful.

  • Flatten Hierarchy By Filtering Out Unnecessary Limbs

    We have numerous hierarchies in our organization that faciliate various reporting views.  Some of those views are slight variations of one another.  One common theme that we have encountered is the need for the same basic view, but with less granularity in terms of rollups.
    Example (alphas are limbs, numerics are leafs):
    Master Hierarchy
    A
         B
              C
                   1
                   2
              D   
                   3
                   4
         E
              5
              6
    We need to derive a custom export that eliminates all the in-between nodes and just rolls all the leafs up to Node A.
    A
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         6
    This type of flattening may happen at any level within the hierarchy (not necessary all rolling up to the top level).  So we need a somewhat dynamic way to achieve this.  I am thinking that a property could be built to flag certain key levels that are required for the custom export, but still not sure how to get those key levels flagged as parents for the leafs, regardless of which level the leaf is at in the Master hierarchy.
    Any thoughts?    

    Hi Denzz,
    What kind of OR condition could be written that would not only filter certain limb nodes out, but also realign the parent/child relationships accordingly.  For example:
    Master Hierarchy
    A
         B
              C
                   1
                   2
              D   
                   3
                   4
         E
              5
              6
    We need to derive a custom export that eliminates rollups C & D.
    A
      B 
         1
         2
         3
         4
      E 
         5
         6
    I can understand creating a formula/property to filter in or out certain rollups.  But we would also need to effectively change the parent value of 1, 2, 3, 4 to B (instead of C or D).  Are you suggesting a formula that checks the immediate parent for the filter property, and if not found, then go to grandparent, then next grandparent and so on until found?

Maybe you are looking for

  • HT4918 what happen with the documents in Idisk, how can i see them in iCloud?

    what happen with the documents that i have in my idisk?? how can i move them into icloud??

  • What is the first step of an abaper after getting the FDS

    what is the first step of an abaper after getting the Functional Document ?what we have to do? how to analyze it , and how to face such interview questions on FDS TDS . any resource available.

  • Return Invoice

    Hi, We created return order with ref. to previous invoice and we changed excise duties. with ref. to that we done retun delivery, at the time of creating invoice system is not picking excise duties as per my return order it is picking that duties fro

  • Easiest way to see the source of photos ?

    Still having trouble ! If on a webpage something is missing hows the easiest way to see the file that should be in the empty place ? Everything works fine on dreamweaver but when i uploaded it all went to pot ! The htm is there but no photos or inter

  • Combobox and arraycollection

    Hi all, I am totaly new with Flex, and need your help. I have a ArrayCollection getMD that saved the field passed from coldfusion cfc ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ <cfcomponent output="false"> <cffunction name="getMD" access="remote" returntype="que