FOI theme (Oracle Maps) rendering very slow

I sniffed the network traffic when a FOI theme is rendered on a map. I determined that for each feature of the theme a network request is sent to the server fetching the corresponding marker. Fetching markers has a big impact on the performance.
I think that fetching the same marker for each feature is not nessary.
Is there a way (undocumented feature or patch) to avoid this from happening?
Thanks in advance,
Jeroen

Hi,
Experienced the same issue. I would like to hear from Oracle Maps development team if they are going to do something with it because our Map with active theme is very slow (rendering of markers and also panning the map). Without active markers it's fast.
thanks,
Branislav

Similar Messages

Query can run in Oracle 10g but very slow in 11g

Hi,
We've just migrated to Oracle 11g and we noticed that some of our view are very slow (it takes seconds in 10g and takes 30 minutes in 11g), and the tables are using the local table.
Do any of you face the same issue?
This is our query:
SELECT
A.wellbore
,a.depth center
,d.MD maxbc
,d.XDELT xbc
,d.YDELT ybc
,e.MD minac
,e.XDELT xac
,e.YDELT yac
from
table_A d,table_A e, table_B a
where a.wellbore = d.WELLBORE (+)
and a.wellbore = e.WELLBORE(+)
and d.MD = (select max(MD) from table_A b where b.MD < a.depth and
d.wellBORE = b.wellBORE)
and e.md = (select min(md) from table_A c where c.MD > a.depth and
e.wellBORE = c.wellBORE);

Thanks I will move to the correct one..
Rafi,
Build the Indexes and it is still slow. I am querying from a view from another database, which is in 10g instances.
Moved: Query can run in Oracle 10g but very slow in 11g
Edited by: 924400 on Apr 1, 2012 6:03 PM
Edited by: 924400 on Apr 1, 2012 6:26 PM

SSRS Subreport - Renders very slow

Hi All,
I have a subreport which is embedded in the main report (form report) which is inturn embedded in a list. The report is executed for different levels with each level having different number of records (say 100, 150, etc.) and gives us a form for each
of the records on a single page. That is the report will have 150 pages for 150 records. My subreport renders very fast when it is run stand alone. Even the SPs written for the subreport are giving results within seconds. But when embedded in the main
report, the whole report is rendering very slow.
I tried passing the parameters to the subreport in two different ways:
1. Assigned the main dataset's record id to the subreport which gives correct data but taking very long time to generate the report.
2. Assigned the main dataset's record id to a hidden parameter and passing that parameter to the subreport as a parameter. This way the report renders very fast but the subreport is always giving the results for the first record id. That is even for the
second record, the subreport is showing up the first record's details which is incorrect.
Have been struggling with this issue for a while. Request you to help me in this regard.
Regards,
Bala.

Hi Bala,
According to your description, it seems that the issue is caused by the parameters. Please check the parameters setting of each subreport control in the main report. Make sure the data types are the same between the parameters, and the values passed to the
subreport parameters are correct.
As to the report performance, we can refer to the ExecutionLog View to monitor it. The total time to generate a reporting server report (RDL) can be divided into 3 elements:
Total time = (TimeDataRetrieval) + (TimeProcessing) + (TimeRendering)
For more details about troubleshooting report performance, please refer to the following documents:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522806(v=sql.105).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2009/01/05/executionlog2-view.aspx
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Premiere CS4 Rendering very slow

recently premier started rendering very slow after making a change to an effect or adding something, etc..
No hardware or software has been added or changed, have tried defragging, updating drivers, etc. Is there some sort of cache or flush I don't know about that premiere uses?
If anyone has any suggestions I am willing to try almost anything because hours of googling have not brought me any luck.
Here are my computer specs right from dxdiag :
System Information
Time of this report: 5/24/2010, 12:19:54
   Operating System: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_gdr.100226-1909)
          Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: System manufacturer
       System Model: System Product Name
               BIOS: BIOS Date: 11/12/09 16:29:41 Ver: 08.00.15
          Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
             Memory: 6144MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 6134MB RAM
          Page File: 3554MB used, 8711MB available
        Windows Dir: C:\Windows
    DirectX Version: DirectX 11
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
   User DPI Setting: Using System DPI
System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)
    DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled
     DxDiag Version: 6.01.7600.16385 32bit Unicode
Display Devices
          Card name: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
       Manufacturer: NVIDIA
          Chip type: Quadro FX 1800
           DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
         Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0638&SUBSYS_062C10DE&REV_A1
     Display Memory: 3560 MB
   Dedicated Memory: 749 MB
      Shared Memory: 2811 MB
       Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
       Monitor Name: Generic PnP Monitor
      Monitor Model: FPD1810
         Monitor Id: GWY0712
        Native Mode: 1280 x 1024(p) (60.020Hz)
        Output Type: HD15
        Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver File Version: 8.17.0011.9759 (English)
     Driver Version: 8.17.11.9759

One hard drive means one set of read/write heads... which can not be in two places at the same time
When parts of the program or swap file are being read from or written to... the data files suffer
A link with many ideas about computer setup http://forums.adobe.com/thread/436215?tstart=0
And even more hardware discussion http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum
Including this post about 3 possible builds http://forums.adobe.com/thread/598040?tstart=0
You really need a 2nd hard drive for video files... I haven't looked in a long time, but I think the official system requirements on Adobe's page even says something about a DEDICATED 7200rpm drive for files

Dynamic FOI in Oracle Maps

Hi!!
I´m trying to use in the Oracle Maps a theme based FOI setting parameters dinamically,
to show some features, according to the user preference. But, what I obtain is zero or all
features.
I changed the code in tutorial to our specific names, except that the in tutorial the names
of cities are VARCHAR and I use an attribute named ID_TIPO which is NUMBER.
The resulting code is below:
var list=document.getElementById("idlist");
var parameters="";
for (var i=1;i<list.options.length;i++ )
parameters=parameters+list.options.value+",";
if (parameters.length>0)
parameters=parameters.substring(0,parameters.length-1);
var marrayPara = new ArrayParameter(parameters,'sarray','tipos_list');
var themebasedfoi=mapview.getThemeBasedFOI("themebasedfoi1");
if (themebasedfoi==null)
themebasedfoi = new MVThemeBasedFOI('themebasedfoi1','mapoteca.TESTE');
themebasedfoi.setQueryParameters(marrayPara);
themebasedfoi.setBringToTopOnMouseOver(true);
mapview.addThemeBasedFOI(themebasedfoi);
else
themebasedfoi.setQueryParameters(marrayPara);
themebasedfoi.setBringToTopOnMouseOver(true);
themebasedfoi.refresh() ;
Tipos_list is defined as
create or replace type tipos_list as table of number(38);
The theme is defined as
<styling_rules>
<rule column="ID_TIPO">
<features style="V.SHAPES_METADADOS"> (id_tipo in (select column_value from table(:1)))) </features>
</rule>
</styling_rules>
In
var marrayPara = new ArrayParameter(parameters,'sarray','tipos_list');
what is the meaning of the 2nd parameter?
Xks.
Oscar

You should use 'narray' as the second parameter in the ArrayParameter constructor. 'sarray' means the array is a VARRAY of VARCHAR2. 'narray' means the array is a VARRAY of NUMBER. I know that ArrayParameter is missing from the API doc. It's our fault. Here is the description that we forgot to include in the API doc.
ArrayParameter(<String> array,<String> elementType, <String> sqlType)
Parameters:
array - a string that specifies the value of the array parameter. If the binding parameter is a number array, it should be specified in the form of num1,num2,...,numN. If the binding variable is a string array, it should be specified in the form of "str1", "str2", ...,"strN". The double quote " inside a string element must be escaped as \". A number array example: 1,2,3,4,5. A string array example: "abc","dadf","asdf\"asdf".
elementType - a string that specifies the type of the array elements. It can be either "narray" (number array) or "sarray" (string array).
sqlType - a string that specifies the name of SQL VARRAY type corresponding to the array parameter.
Returns:
The newly created ArrayParameter FOI object.

Preview rendering Very Slow

Hi,
Can anyone help with Preview.app slow rendering issue for large PDF files, it is very slow after upgrading to lion. (AutoCAD drawings that are PDFed)
Small PDF documents are fine.

Hi Guys I work with a lot of pdf files with being a student at uni and not sure these tips might help.
Try an app called skim which is free it handles pdfs nicely and looks similar to the preview app.
Also if a pdf is slow to scroll try selecting all the pages goto file print. Then on the bottom left hand side of the print window select pdf and then save as pdf. I have found on some pdfs (usually the ones in black and white and look like a photo copy) using the the print save as pdf option has then allowed me to view a pdf fine in the preview app without any issues. Hope this is useful.
I suspect its to do with pixels per inch or dots per inch of the document.

Oracle Forms Performance very slow on the internet

Hi ,
We have developed a form application with forms Developer 10g and deployed it on a ORACLE 10g AS. If the user runs our application over intranet there is no any network problem or not any performance decrease occurs. However if we deploy our application over WAN or internet, the startup time of the forms become Very Slow.
What we can use to make it faster , is there any other tools we have to learn like APEX or JDeveloper , what is the best solution , should we forget the Developer for ever and starting with other tools with fast performance on the internet , if so , what we have to learn , please help us , its common problem .
any help please ,

Interesting thread....
You asked whether "Forms" is the right product for the job. Well, the answer to that question will depend entirely on exactly what functionality you need and your skill-set. One advantage of using Forms over other Oracle products is that, in my opinion, Forms allows you to create simple or complex applications very quickly, with limited development experience. The downside to using Forms however, is that it does use a fairly thick client making startup slower than other applications. Generally, Forms is not very well suited for Internet deployments although it can and has been done. If your goal is to use a product which is easy to work with and is appropriate for Internet deployment, you may want to consider Apex. The downside to Apex is that unlike Forms, Apex generates what I like to call static html pages. Meaning once a page is displayed for the end-user, the data on it remains the same until the user forces interaction with the server again, but in this case the entire page would be refreshed in order to realize the changes. In the case of Forms, any content displayed to the end-user can be change without completely refreshing their view. I like to refer to Forms as a living application because unlike Apex, it can easily respond to most user inputs and/or server side changes almost in real-time. If you want this "live" experience, Forms might be the way to go, although at the cost of some startup performance. Alternatively, Oracle ADF can also give you a similar live-like experience. However, ADF will require a broader skill-set (pl/sql, java, html, etc), whereas with Forms you could get away with only knowing pl/sql although java knowledge would be helpful.
The views expressed in this thread are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oracle.

Oracle connection is very slow

Hello,
I install oracle enterprise 5 and oracle 11g R2 and when i connect oracle from plsql developer connectoion is very very slow.
What do you think about this problem ?
i don't want to install oracle 11g on windows server !

Hi,
Get the network speed/connection checked from the source server to database server. Also check the resources usage on client and server machine for any sign of resource issues.
Regards

Deployment and Execution of Mapping is very slow

The routine job of executing the process flow use to take 45 minutes earlier and now it is taking over 2 hrs. There is not any substantial change in the amount of data to be loaded also there is enough tablespace on the database.
The other thing I have noticed is that when I deploy the mappings , the initial start is very slow and after that it progresses well.
Can anybody help me with this.
Thanks..

Shalabh -
This may help: We've have found that OWB likes a lot of sessions and, for whatever reason, doesn't always re-use available sessions or close sessions that are no longer needed. When one developer deploys and executes a mapping, we typically see 13 open sessions on our staging instance and it increases from there if the developer previews the data in a dimension or cube. This can become an issue in some environments when you get 4 or 5 developers producing and we have found that it affects performance. The tool does appear to release those sessions when you exit the program completely.
Talk to your DBA or launch OEM if you have the appropriate permissions. Hope this helps.

Oracle query running very slow

Hi,
We've MS-Access application which was pointing to UDB. Now we migrated it to point Oracle DB 9.2. After migration some of the query is running very slow.
These queries used to take less than 30 seconds in UDB now taking more than 5 Minutes in Oracle.
some more obeservation :
(1) Some of the queries using "HAVING" clause without any aggregate function. When I moved this condition to "WHERE" clause, performance improved a lot.
But problem is that I can't suggest this solution to "USERS". They are creating query using "query wizard" in MS-Access and they started creating noise on this.
(2) I tested same MDB in two different PCs and same query is returning records in 4 seconds in one system, is taking more than 10 minutes in other system.
Since I'm new to MS-Access, I don't know what other information I need to provide here.
Please help me out.

ms wrote:
Hi All
I am using Oracle 11g . My table contains 10-12 lac rows.Do not use the word lac: it is common in the Indian sub-continent but not known much outside of
there because it is not standard English.
>
1) what is the difference between a index on one column and an index of number of columns ( i.e composite index). The obvious answer of one contains only one column and the other contains more than one.
2) For what columns in a where clause should index be created ( single columns index or composite index ).Depends
3) Also can u suggest how to improve the perfomane of thsi query?Please read: SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
which tells you how to ask a performance related question

DBProviderFactories.GetFactory("Oracle.DataAccess.Client") very slow

The call to System.Data.Common.DBProvidersFactories.GetFactory("Oracle.DataAccess.Client") is taking over 2 minutes to return on my computer. By comparison, calls to GetFactory() for the System.Data.SqlClient and IBM.Data.DB2 takes less than a second.
Even more strange, the same call is very fast if I am running the code inside of the VS2010 debugger.
ODAC version 11.2.0.1.2 (32bit version)
Windows 7 64 bit
.NET 3.5 SP1
Oracle server - not relevant since test pgm is not connecting to a serve.
Code developed with VS 2010.
Test pgm built with:
- Target CPU=32 (so app runs as 32bit mode, instead of 64)
- Target Framework = .NET 3.5 SP1
The call has not always been this slow. I have been running with ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 since it's release. But, IIRC, the slowness just started several weeks ago.
Below is the test pgm:
Imports System.Configuration
Imports System.Data.Common
Module Module1
    Sub Main()
        CreateFactory("Oracle.DataAccess.Client")
        CreateFactory("System.Data.SqlClient")
        CreateFactory("IBM.Data.DB2")
    End Sub
    Sub CreateFactory(ByVal providerName As String)
        Dim sw = New Stopwatch
        sw.Start()
        Dim factory = DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(providerName)
        sw.Stop()
        If factory Is Nothing Then
            Throw New Exception(String.Format("DbProviderFactories.GetFactory({0}) failed", providerName))
        End If
        Console.WriteLine("DbProviderFactories.GetFactory({0}) call took {1} secs", providerName, sw.Elapsed.TotalSeconds)
    End Sub
End ModuleThe output I get is:
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(Oracle.DataAccess.Client) call took 130.1584958 secs
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(System.Data.SqlClient) call took 0.0001462 secs
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(IBM.Data.DB2) call took 0.1252213 secs
Please let me know if you need any more information. All help is appreciated.
Jim

As I mentioned before, if I loaded the DBProviderFactory object, for the IBM.Data.DB2 provider, loading the Oracle.DataAccesss.Client provider ran quickly. The IBM.Data.DB2 provider always using a distributed transaction to communicate with the database. So, my guess is that the IBM DBProviderFactory was doing work to prepare for a distributed transaction. And this prep work allows the Oracle DBProviderFactory to run much faster.
So to test my theory, I created a TransactionScope object, before creating the Oracle DBProviderFactory. See new code below:
<pre>
Sub Main()
Using ts = New Transactions.TransactionScope()
CreateFactory("Oracle.DataAccess.Client")
End Using
End Sub
Sub CreateFactory(ByVal providerName As String)
Dim sw = New Stopwatch
sw.Start()
Dim factory = DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(providerName)
sw.Stop()
If factory Is Nothing Then
Throw New Exception(String.Format("DbProviderFactories.GetFactory({0}) failed", providerName))
End If
Console.WriteLine("DbProviderFactories.GetFactory({0}) call took {1} secs", providerName, sw.Elapsed.TotalSeconds)
End Sub
</pre>
And this was the result:
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(Oracle.DataAccess.Client) call took 0.1925129 sec
a dramatic speedup.
Is this expected behavior? More importantly, is there a fix to make loading the Oracle DbProviderFactory faster without requiring the creation of a TransactionScope object?
Thanks,
Jim
Edited by: thompkin on Nov 18, 2010 10:55 AM

How do I fix CS4 from rendering very slow?

I just swithced from CS3 to CS4. The process went well and I did not have to reinstall CS4 to access my projects; thanks to all your help.
After installing CS4 I uninstalled CS3 then I defragged.
Now rendering takes a very long time in CS4.
What is the magic button I need to push to speed things up?
I have Vista 64 bit
8GB RAM
6000X2 at3.1Hz processor

Is the slow render issue happening when you open a CS3 *.prproj with Premiere CS4? We've had many issues with CS3 projects opened with CS4. For example, stuttering video that has blur effects applied. I recommend you avoid doing that. Many have reported that CS3 and CS4 can peacefully co-exist on the same system. That may be your solution if you need to revisit CS3 projects.
Then of course there is the issue of hardware specs. CS4 runs great on the new Intel i7 processors with lots of RAM...6GB+. Harm has a good article on video editing hardware specs. The only point I disagree with is on packing a full tower case full of high capacity hard drives. We have found that in many cases when one of our editing system slows to a crawl, the cause is a hard drive that has one type of issue or another. One workaround if you want to load up on internal drives is a quality hot-swappable cage that holds multiple drives. Kingwin has a model for instance that holds 4 drives and uses up only 3 DVD-sized computer case openings. There could be drive cooling issues with the Kingwin product because the included fans are small and some have claimed, "cheap".
We use the Panasonic P2 cameras. The video looks great and the resolution is all that we need for the type of work that we do. Editing is smooth when we edit P2 on external drives connected via E-Sata. This keeps the internal drives to a minimum.
I would take a look at the new SSDs for your system drive, and install two additional internal drives. Look at the consumer drive ratings on newegg.com. For example, some of the Seagate 1.5's have reliability issues.

Rendering VERY slow or stays at 0% before crashing...

I am working in a project with multiple clips - up to 10 layers of video and audio at any one time. I'm using all proxy files. I am using split screen effects on most of it and other effects also. Lots of compound clips and I am also cartooning the whole thing by putting the effect on one big compound clip. The whole video is 3minutes long. I've managed to cartoon the whole thing (after hours of waiting and multiple freezing on 28%) but there is still more rendering to do within the large compound clip that I have cartoonise (for some reason nothing within the large compound clip would render unless I click inside the compound clip - is this normal?). So anyway the rendering left to do seems to stay on 0% forever without budging and then eventually the dreaded beachball comes up and it crashes. It's driving me mad. Frankly the whole rendering thing is taking hours and it just seems messed up - again, is this normal?
I'm using latest iMac 3.4Ghz. Core i7 16GB Ram. All event and project files are on an external My Book Firewire 800. I am running no other programs during rendering.
I tried looking in library-preferences to delete them and restart but I couldn't find them! I haven't tried reinstalling. I logged in froma different user as I read you can test if it works better...but doesn't that mean I have reinstall Final Cut again..? Might as well just do a reinstall no?
Any solutions to these problems? I just started using this program...any other recormmendations of video editing software? I won't be able to stand this much longer...

This is my pet checklist for questions regarding FCP X performance - you may have already addressed some of the items - and some are relevant to playback rather than rendering, but it's worth checking.
Make sure you're using the latest version of the application - FCP X 10.0.5 runs very well on my 2009 MacPro 2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon with 16 GB RAM and ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024 MB. I run it with Lion 10.7.5.
First, check that you have at least 20% free space on your system drive.
For smooth playback without dropping frames, make sure 'Better Performance' is selected in the FCP X Preferences - Playback Tab.
If you have not already done so, move your Projects and Events to a fast (Firewire 800 or faster) external HD. Make sure the drive's formatted OS Extended (journalling's not required for video). You should always keep at least 20% free space on the Hard Drives that your Media, Projects and Events are on.
Check the spec of your Mac against the system requirements:
http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/specs/
Check the spec of your graphics card. If it's listed here, it's not suitable:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4664
If you are getting crashes, there is some conflict on the OS. Create a new (admin) user account on your system and use FCP X from there - if it runs a lot better, there's a conflict and a clean install would be recommended.
Keep projects to 20 mins or less. If you have a long project, work on 20 min sections then paste these into a final project for export.
If you ever experience dropped frames, I strongly recommend you use ProRes 422 Proxy - it edits and plays back like silk because the files are small but lightly compressed (not much packing and unpacking to do) - but remember to select 'Original or Optimised Media' (FCP X Preferences > Playback) just before you export your movie, otherwise it will be exported at low resolution.
If you have plenty of processor power, for the ultimate editing experience, create Optimised Media - most camera native files are highly compressed and need a great deal of processor power to play back - particularly if you add titles, filters or effects. ProRes 422 takes up much more hard drive space but is very lightly compressed. It edits and plays back superbly.
Hide Audio Waveforms at all times when you don't need them (both in Browser and Storyline / Timeline). They take up a lot of processor power. (Use the switch icon at the bottom-right of your timeline to select a format without waveforms if you don't need them at the moment, then switch back when you do).
Create folders in the Project and Events libraries and put any projects you are not working on currently, in those folders. This will help a lot. There's a great application for this, called Event Manager X - for the tiny cost it's an invaluable application.
http://assistedediting.intelligentassistance.com/EventManagerX/
Unless you cannot edit and playback without it, turn off Background Rendering in Preferences (under Playback) - this will help general performance and you can always render when you need to by selecting the clip (or clips) and pressing Ctrl+R.
The biggest single improvement I saw in performance was when I upgraded the RAM from 8 GB to 16.
Andy

Oracle Login is very slow

Hi all,
I have two Windows 2000 Servers:
1. Compaq Server with one 2.4G CPU, 1G RAM and 30G harddisk
2. Acer Server with one 2.4G CPU, 1G RAM and 30G harddisk
The software configuration of two server are identical, they both have:
1 Windows 2000 Server with SP3
2 Oracle 8i ( Oracle configuration(such SGA, buffer size, etc...) are also identical
But I found two strange things I cannot explain.
1.)
When I local(not throuhg network) login Oracle on Compaq Server, it only takes no more than 1second to login. But When I local login Oracle on Acer Server it takes about 3 seconds to logon.
2.)
I local login to Oracle on Acer Server, and followed by executing a query which involves external procedure call, it takes 5 seconds to finish that query. In the same session, I executed the same query again and again, it only took 2 seconds to complete. I donot know why the first execution of a query (with external procedure call) takes longer time. It seems Oracle takes some time to load the external procedure service in Acer server. Again the strange thing, there is not such issue in Compaq Server, no matter when I execute the same query, it always take 2 seconds.
Could any one tell me why Oracle on Acer Server has slow response in certain situations (e.g Logon , and run first query involve external procedure). And any solution to solve the problem?
Thanks in advance.
Frank

Could any one tell me why Oracle on Acer Server has slow response in certain situations (Maybe that's why Compaq charge more than Acer.
Cheers, APC

Oracle Database suddenly very slow!

Hello,
After running our Oracle 10g instance on Red Hat Enterprise for more than two years without an itch it suddenly became extremely slow. A simple query that would take a few seconds now takes an hour to complete! It is not the network since the same happens from a local console.
I checked the log files on bdump and cdump but couldn't see anything wrong.
Any assistance would be much appreciated!
Thank you in advance.

hi,
do you perform the following
execute dbms_stats.gather_system_stats ('Start');
let the system do some typical work
execute dbms_stats.gather_system_stats ('Stop');
try running this and see what happens.
could you also post back some
vmstat 10 13
under typical work load and also some
sar figures
rgds
alan

FOI theme (Oracle Maps) rendering very slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for