FOR ALL ENTRIES IN Problem
Hello,
probably it is a silly problem, but can anybody tell me why this FOR ALL ENTRIES IN statement does not fill all the columns of my internal table?
At the end of the report only the columns LGOBE contains values.
data itab type zmm_t_alv.
select mardmatnr mardwerks mardlgort mardlabst
maktspras maktmaktx
into corresponding fields of table itab
from mard inner join makt
on mardmatnr = maktmatnr
where makt~spras = 'D'.
select lgobe
into corresponding fields of table itab
from t001l
for all entries in itab
where t001l~werks = itab-werks.
break-point.
Thanks,
Manuel
Please read the documentation aboutr for all entries
For all entries selects all records from a db table which correspond to the entries in an internal table, the result must be stored in a different table.
Otherwise use a loop at itab.
select single ...
modify itab
endloop
Be careful with empty For all entries tables, it behave like a ranges table, no entry means no restriction and you get all records from the db table. That is a different behavior than the loop above.
Use field1 field2 ... in corresponding fields of ....
If you specify only one field then you get only one result.
If you want one the field 'lgobe' then use into wa-lgobe and not the much slower into corresponding!
Siegfried
Similar Messages
-
Two questions :
<b>(1) I use join with for all entries: the performance will go down?:</b>
SELECT t1~MBLNR t1~MJAHR ZEILE BUDAT
INTO TABLE gt_mseg
FROM MSEG as T1 INNER JOIN MKPF AS T2
ON T1~MBLNR = T2~MBLNR and
T2~MJAHR = T2~MJAHR
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_coss
WHERE T1~MJAHR = gt_coss-GJAHR AND
T1~AUFNR = gt_coss-aufnr AND
( BWART = '261' OR
BWART = '262' ) AND
T2~BUDAT IN r_budat.
<b>(2) With "For all entries", if itab is too long, performance will go down?. In affirmative case. What can I do?</b>Hi Jose,
You'll have to make sure your global table gt_coss isn't empty.
A nasty little habit of the IN statement (for all entries is a kind of IN statement)
is that when it is empty, the system selekts all records.
You might know this when u use Select-Options in your statement (like r_budat).
Also there is an OSS note on he for all entries (531337) problems on i-series database.
Greetings Fred. -
Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table
We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
WHERE
status = 'IAI200' AND
logdat IN gs_dat AND
ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
Thank you!>
Matthias Weisensel wrote:
> We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
>
>
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
> FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
> WHERE
> status = 'IAI200' AND
> logdat IN gs_dat AND
> ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
>
> In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
> Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
>
> Thank you!
You can't expect miracles. With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab? How many records is the select bringing back? I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table.
In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time. -
Hi experts,
I have a below statement in my code
"SELECT on EKPO for all entries on ITAB (which is having 4 hundread thousand recods )"
giving dump saying "MEMORY_PGFREE_FAILED" and "Error releasing memory block in paging"
i need your suggestion to avoid the memory problem
"MEMORY_PGFREE_FAILED" ?
can we go ahead with EXTRACT logic, does this solve the memory problem?
thoughts will be appriciated,
Thanks,
Shaik bhashaSee the example code :
REPORT ZSPFLI LINE-SIZE 132 LINE-COUNT 65(3)
NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING.
TABLES:SPFLI,SCARR, SFLIGHT, SBOOK.
SELECT-OPTIONS: MYCARRID FOR SPFLI-CARRID.
FIELD-GROUPS: HEADER, SPFLI_FG, SFLIGHT_FG, SBOOK_FG.
INSERT:
SPFLI-CARRID
SPFLI-CONNID
SFLIGHT-FLDATE
SBOOK-BOOKID
INTO HEADER,
SPFLI-CARRID
SPFLI-CONNID
SPFLI-CITYFROM
SPFLI-AIRPFROM
SPFLI-CITYTO
SPFLI-AIRPTO
SPFLI-DEPTIME
SCARR-CARRNAME
INTO SPFLI_FG,
SFLIGHT-FLDATE
SFLIGHT-SEATSMAX
SFLIGHT-SEATSOCC
SFLIGHT-PRICE
INTO SFLIGHT_FG,
SBOOK-BOOKID
SBOOK-CUSTOMID
SBOOK-CUSTTYPE
SBOOK-SMOKER
INTO SBOOK_FG.
SELECT * FROM SPFLI WHERE CARRID IN MYCARRID.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM SCARR WHERE CARRID = SPFLI-CARRID.
EXTRACT SPFLI_FG.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT
WHERE CARRID = SPFLI-CARRID AND CONNID = SPFLI-CONNID.
EXTRACT SFLIGHT_FG.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK
WHERE CARRID = SFLIGHT-CARRID AND
CONNID = SFLIGHT-CONNID AND FLDATE = SFLIGHT-FLDATE.
EXTRACT SBOOK_FG.
CLEAR SBOOK.
ENDSELECT.
CLEAR SFLIGHT.
ENDSELECT.
CLEAR SPFLI.
ENDSELECT.
SORT.
LOOP.
AT SPFLI_FG.
FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING.
WRITE: / SCARR-CARRNAME,
SPFLI-CONNID, SPFLI-CITYFROM,
SPFLI-AIRPFROM, SPFLI-CITYTO, SPFLI-AIRPTO, SPFLI-DEPTIME.
FORMAT COLOR OFF.
ENDAT.
AT SFLIGHT_FG.
WRITE: /15 SFLIGHT-FLDATE, SFLIGHT-PRICE, SFLIGHT-SEATSMAX,
SFLIGHT-SEATSOCC.
ENDAT.
AT SBOOK_FG.
WRITE: /30 SBOOK-BOOKID, SBOOK-CUSTOMID,
SBOOK-CUSTTYPE, SBOOK-SMOKER.
ENDAT.
ENDLOOP. -
I have a problem in using for all entries
Hi i have a problem in using <b>for all entries</b>
i have declared the two internal tables as below
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB OCCURS 10,
EBELN LIKE EKKO-EBELN,
LIFNR LIKE EKKO-LIFNR,
EBELP LIKE EKBE-EBELP,
BELNR LIKE EKBE-BELNR,
* MATNR LIKE EKPO-MATNR,
* TXZ01 LIKE EKPO-TXZ01,
VGABE LIKE EKBE-VGABE,
GJAHR LIKE EKBE-GJAHR,
KNUMV LIKE EKKO-KNUMV,
END OF ITAB.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB1 OCCURS 10,
EBELN LIKE EKPO-EBELN,
MATNR LIKE EKPO-MATNR,
TXZ01 LIKE EKPO-TXZ01,
WERKS LIKE EKPO-WERKS,
NETWR LIKE EKPO-NETWR,
MENGE LIKE EKPO-MENGE,
MWSKZ LIKE EKPO-MWSKZ,
LIFNR LIKE EKKO-LIFNR,
EBELP LIKE EKBE-EBELP,
BELNR LIKE EKBE-BELNR,
END OF ITAB1.
<b>and now i have tried to move the values in those internal tables using these statements</b>
SELECT A~EBELN A~LIFNR A~KNUMV B~VGABE B~EBELP B~GJAHR B~BELNR
FROM EKKO AS A
INNER JOIN EKBE AS B ON B~EBELN = A~EBELN
INTO CORRESPONDING
FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB WHERE B~VGABE = '2'.
SELECT EKPO~EBELN EKPO~MATNR EKPO~TXZ01 EKPO~WERKS EKPO~NETWR
EKPO~MENGE EKPO~MWSKZ
FROM EKPO
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB1
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB
WHERE EBELN = ITAB-EBELN.
LOOP AT ITAB1.
READ TABLE ITAB WITH KEY EBELN = ITAB-EBELN.
ITAB-EBELN = ITAB1-EBELN.
ITAB1-LIFNR = ITAB-LIFNR.
ITAB1-EBELP = ITAB-EBELP.
ITAB1-BELNR = ITAB-BELNR.
ITAB1-EBELP = ITAB-EBELP.
APPEND ITAB1.
ENDLOOP.
But when i was using loop then it was displaying values in debugging mode but while i was trying to execute it was taking a lot of time i thought that it was due to more information in the already declared internal table so i have tried to remove the previous entries but it was showing an error while i was removing the old entries
and when i remove the loop at itab1 then i'll get output directly but it was displaying the itab fields which is my 1st internal table but not the values of itab1 can u explain me what is the possible error for that
Regards ,
Pavanbefore using for all entries in, u need to check whether the driver internal table is empty, if it is empty, u should not enter into select statement.
if u wont use this check means, when the driver internal table is empty, the second select will take all the entires from the tables.
SELECT AEBELN ALIFNR AKNUMV BVGABE BEBELP BGJAHR B~BELNR
FROM EKKO AS A
INNER JOIN EKBE AS B ON BEBELN = AEBELN
INTO CORRESPONDING
FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB WHERE B~VGABE = '2'.
if itab[] is not initial.
SELECT EKPOEBELN EKPOMATNR EKPOTXZ01 EKPOWERKS EKPO~NETWR
EKPOMENGE EKPOMWSKZ
FROM EKPO
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB1
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB
WHERE EBELN = ITAB-EBELN.
endif.
I hope this will help u.
else,
Sujatha. -
Facin problems in the 'Select... for all entries'
I am facing problem with this piece of code, please share ur thoughts on it. I have specified the inputs.
I am extracting the open items from the BSIS table for specified 3 account number.
Inputs to the prg:
field No. of values
r_bukrs 1
r_hkont 2
r_blart 6
r_budat date range of 1 yr
r_bldat nil
v_tosdef contain 1 account number
" In each FI document posted, one line will have the 'v_tosdef' account number and one account from the 'r_hkont' values."
So will this query efficient.
SELECT bukrs
hkont
gjahr
belnr
budat
bldat
xblnr
blart
shkzg
dmbtr
FROM bsis
INTO TABLE i_bsis
WHERE bukrs IN r_bukrs " Company code
AND hkont = v_tosdef " Account number
AND budat IN r_budat " Posting date
AND bldat IN r_bldat " Document date
AND blart IN r_blart. " Document type
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE i003.
STOP.
ENDIF.
*@ Collecting the BELNR & GJAHR From the extracted records
li_bsis[] = i_bsis[].
SORT li_bsis BY bukrs gjahr belnr.
DELETE ADJACENT
DUPLICATES FROM li_bsis
COMPARING bukrs gjahr belnr.
IF NOT li_bsis[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT bukrs
hkont
gjahr
belnr
budat
bldat
xblnr
blart
shkzg
dmbtr
FROM bsis
APPENDING TABLE i_bsis
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN li_bsis
WHERE bukrs = li_bsis-bukrs " Company code
AND hkont IN r_hkont " Account number
AND gjahr = li_bsis-gjahr " Fiscal year
AND belnr = li_bsis-belnr. " Document num
BSIS table size around 86GB
primary index size aroung 33GB
and the index quality is 54%
the CBO shows less cost, but the actual runs takes too much disk read's / bgets..
Message was edited by:
SandyHi Sandy,
You indicated the size of the tables and index, what is the total number of records in your BSIS?
In your range tables, make sure they are postive formed.
Ex. r_bukrs : I EQ '1001', and not I NE '1000'.
You should consider coding your statements to check for input for bldat, code it with r_bldat and then another set without. It should be better performance to not have empty where conditions. So two routines, Selects with bldat and without.
Don't know if you have a Basis person to help analyze the performance, but you should look at the indexes in BSIS. You may have several indexes that contain some of your input fields but they may be spread across several indexes or there may be none. But say you have 5 indexes and it happens that just one of your parameters are in each of those indexes. Well, it can only use one index so while you think you are providing alot of parameters to help performance only one field is being used to access the index. What you need to do then is to find an index that has the most fields in your where clause and see if you can add to that, so long it's not an SAP index. If it's a z index consider adding additional fields to it, or consider creating a new index.
You can at least analyze the first Select in your DEV client. Run a trace, ST05 and then execute your code. It will show you which index it has used if any.
Also, look at the query values it is passing to the database. You said you get 6 M records on the first Select. This just seem like a lot of records, which is for just one account number (v_tosdef) along with the other parameters. I'm wondering if there's a problem with your input data. With 6M in your first table, your FOR ALL ENTRIES statement will be executed 1.2 million times. Tyically the database interface breaks down your Select-For All entries statement into 5 records per query. Again, run ST05 and you will see this.
In SE16, on your BSIS table, what is your count of records if you enter only the account number?
As a test, you might want to try entering all your parameters in SE16, run ST05 to trace the SQL to see what it is doing. You may have to kill your SE16 session or it may time out on you. You can stop your ST05 trace before your SE16 finishes and it will still show how SAP is going after the data and what index it used.
Let me know if this helped any.
Regards,
Filler -
Problem with FOR ALL ENTRIES statement
Hi all
please find the problem in the select statement.
SELECT vbbe~vbeln
vbap~vstel
marc~dispo
vbbe~matnr
vbbe~kunnr
vbbe~werks
vbbe~mbdat
vbbe~omeng
INTO TABLE l_t_dvbeln
FROM vbbe
INNER JOIN vbak
ON
vbbe~vbeln = vbak~vbeln
inner join vbap
on
vbbe~vbeln = vbap~vbeln and
vbbe~matnr = vbap~matnr
inner join marc
on
vbbe~matnr = marc~matnr and
vbbe~werks = marc~werks
FOR ALL entries IN g_t_stock
WHERE vbbe~matnr = g_t_stock-matnr
AND vbbe~werks = g_t_stock-werks
AND vbak~vkorg = g_t_stock-vkorg
AND vbak~vtweg = g_t_stock-vtweg
AND vbbe~kunnr = g_t_stock-kunnr
AND vbbe~mbdat IN r_mbdat.
g_t_stock is having only one record i.e.,
g_t_stock-vstel = 'DF01'.
g_t_stock-dispo = 'DEI'.
g_t_stock-matnr = '00100833'.
g_t_stock-maktx = 'SAC (300X400)'.
g_t_stock-kunnr = '0000600431'.
g_t_stock-werks = 'PF71'.
g_t_stock-labst = '7727'.
g_t_stock-vkorg = 'SF71'.
g_t_stock-vtweg = 'IC'.
and r_mbdat has the date range as
r_mbdat-sign = I
r_mbdat-option = BT
r_mbdat-low = 15.05.2008
r_mbdat-high = 08.06.2008
In vbak vbap & marc tables i have only one record as per the above selection criteria.
in VBBE table i have 7 records which satisfies the above criteria. But the select staement retrieves only 5 records.
if we remove for all entries and hardcode the values in the select statement then it retrieves all 7 records.
can anybody help me.
what is the reason it is showing only 5 records.Hi all
actually it has to retrieve the following records
VBELN MATNR KUNNR WERKS MBDAT LABST
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 15.05.2008 20.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 15.05.2008 20.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 22.05.2008 5.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 22.05.2008 7.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 27.05.2008 10.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 27.05.2008 10.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 29.05.2008 10.000
But it is retrieving only 5 records as below
VBELN MATNR KUNNR WERKS MBDAT LABST
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 15.05.2008 20.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 22.05.2008 5.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 22.05.2008 7.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 27.05.2008 10.000
30001417 00100833 600431 PF71 29.05.2008 10.000
Please give the reason -
Problem in FOR ALL ENTRIES IN statement
Hi Abaper,
I have a problem in FOR ALL ENTRIES IN statement.
I have a table /ccsht/na_estadi in this table for the particulat date there are 14 records, but my internal table read only 5 record.
Below is my code:
SELECT sociedad
xhotel_id
FROM /ccsht/mt_photel
INTO TABLE it_comp_hotel
WHERE sociedad IN p_comp
AND xhotel_id IN p_hotid.
BREAK-POINT.
SORT it_comp_hotel BY sociedad.
SELECT xhotel_id
xfecha_id
xocupacion
tot_habs_hotel
xnum_pax1
FROM /ccsht/na_estadi
INTO TABLE it_estadi "CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_estadi
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_comp_hotel
WHERE xhotel_id EQ it_comp_hotel-xhotel_id
AND xfecha_id IN p_date.
Can any one help me this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
AmitHi Amit,
Try below
SELECT sociedad
xhotel_id
FROM /ccsht/mt_photel
INTO TABLE it_comp_hotel
WHERE sociedad IN p_comp
AND xhotel_id IN p_hotid.
BREAK-POINT.
* SORT it_comp_hotel BY sociedad. "Remove this SORT statement.
SELECT xhotel_id
xfecha_id
xocupacion
tot_habs_hotel
xnum_pax1
FROM /ccsht/na_estadi
INTO TABLE it_estadi
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_comp_hotel
WHERE xhotel_id EQ it_comp_hotel-xhotel_id
AND xfecha_id IN p_date.
Note: 1) i didn't find the these tables in my SAP system
2) If your table is still not fetching the data, tell me is it the Cluster table,. if yes,.. you need to
maintain the all the primary keys other wise you wont get the data in internal able.
hope this will help you out.
Regards! -
Alternative for / Problems with: "For all entries in data_package"
Hi Guys
I doing some ABAP in a Start Rotine in BW and would like to do the following:
select * from /BI0/PMATERIAL into table 0mat
for all entries in DATA_PACKAGE
where material = DATA_PACKAGE-/bic/zmaterial.
But I get the following error:
E:When using the addition "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab", the fields "MATERIAL" and "DATA_PACKAGE-/BIC/ZMATERIAL" must have the same type and length. and length.
ZMATERIAL:
- Length: 28
- Type: CHAR - Character String
ZMATERIAL:
- Length: 18
- Type: CHAR - Character String
According to the error message "For all entries" cannot be used in this case since the lengths are not identical, but is there an alternative way to do what I would like to do?
Thanks in advance, kind regards,
TorbenHi
one thing you can try like this define one variable in other itab of same type
then loop at the first table and assign it to new field and modify the itab
then use this field with for all entries
Regards
Shiva -
Problem in using for all entries
Hi,
I am populating one field of an internal table for all entries existing in that internal table.That field is getting populated but rest of the fields changed to its default values.
Please check the code
SELECT amatnr awerk almenge01 almenge02 almenge03 almenge04 almenge05 almenge06 a~lmenge07
almenge08 aprueflos aart acharg bvcode bvdatum
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_out
FROM qals AS a INNER JOIN qave AS b
ON aprueflos = bprueflos
WHERE a~matnr IN s_matnr
AND a~werk IN s_werk
AND a~art IN s_art
AND a~stat33 = 'X'
AND b~vcodegrp IN s_vcdgrp
AND b~vcode IN s_vcode
AND b~vdatum IN s_vdatum.
I am getting error here i_out is getting populated in teh first select statement
SELECT mncod
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_out
FROM qmsm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_out
WHERE qmnum = i_out-qmnum.Try changing your query in the following way....
SELECT a~matnr a~werk a~lmenge01 a~lmenge02 a~lmenge03 a~lmenge04
a~lmenge05 a~lmenge06 a~lmenge07
a~lmenge08 a~prueflos a~art a~charg b~vcode b~vdatum
<b>c~mncod</b>
FROM qals AS a INNER JOIN qave AS b
ON a~prueflos = b~prueflos
<b>join qmsm as c
ON a~prueflos = c~qmnum</b>
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_out
WHERE a~matnr IN s_matnr
AND a~werk IN s_werk
AND a~art IN s_art
* AND a~stat33 = 'X'
AND b~vcodegrp IN s_vcdgrp
AND b~vcode IN s_vcode
AND b~vdatum IN s_vdatum.
with the above you can do the two steps only once .
you need not to go for for all entries .
Regards
vijay -
Problem with FOR ALL ENTRIES IN
This is my simple source code.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: t_stpo LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo_itm LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn. " BOM item node number
The output from this source including BOM item node number 00000003, 00000007 but at SQL stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn doesn't effected.
Could Anyone please tell me why?
Are there something wrong?
Thank you in advance.Hi,
You can also Use ranges for Stlnr and Stlkn fields, instead of int table.
TABLES: stpo.
DATA: begin of t_stpo OCCURS 0.
stlnr like stpo-stlnr,
stlkn like stpo-stlkn,
end of t_stpo.
data t_stpo_itm LIKE stpo OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000003'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
t_stpo-stlnr = '00000058'.
t_stpo-stlkn = '00000007'.
append t_stpo.
clear t_stpo.
if not t_stpo[] is initial.
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_stpo
WHERE stlnr = t_stpo-stlnr " BOM No.
AND stlkn <> t_stpo-stlkn. " BOM item node number
endif.
or you can simply write a select for STPO like this:
SELECT * FROM stpo INTO TABLE t_stpo_itm
WHERE stlnr = '00000058' " BOM No.
AND ( stlkn <> '00000007' or stlkn <> '00000003' ). " BOM item node number
regards,
Anji -
Hi all,
When i was trying to use for all entries, i am not able to pull records inside my internal table. Though both of the tables have the common key fields between them(and ofcourse have entries in that). Now what i have analyzed was, the first table is having 7 primary keys and the one i am using for 'for all entries' comes 6th. Does this gives any impact in pulling records inside my internal table?.Else please give me a possible solution for this. The alternate statement(a normal select query with * ) that i had used for this reserved my dialog processor for a while. Which resulted in 'time exceeded' short dump.Hi,
The WHERE clause of the SELECT statement has a special variant that allows you to derive conditions from the lines and columns of an internal table:
SELECT ... FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab> WHERE <cond> ...
<cond> may be formulated as described above. If you specify a field of the internal table <itab> as an operand in a condition, you address all lines of the internal table. The comparison is then performed for each line of the internal table. For each line, the system selects the lines from the database table that satisfy the condition. The result set of the SELECT statement is the union of the individual selections for each line of the internal table. Duplicate lines are automatically eliminated from the result set. If <itab> is empty, the addition FOR ALL ENTRIES is disregarded, and all entries are read.
The internal table <itab> must have a structured line type, and each field that occurs in the condition <cond> must be compatible with the column of the database with which it is compared. Do not use the operators LIKE, BETWEEN, and IN in comparisons using internal table fields. You may not use the ORDER BY clause in the same SELECT statement.
You can use the option FOR ALL ENTRIES to replace nested select loops by operations on internal tables. This can significantly improve the performance for large sets of selected data.
Hope this is useful
Reema -
Select ... for all entries problem
Hi,
I'm making select statements to BKPF and BSEG, but I can't do an inner join between this two table because BSEG it's a cluster table so I have to do a SELECT... FOR ALL ENTRIES, but in SE16 I make the same query that I have writen in my program as shown below,
SELECT BUKRS BELNR GJAHR BUDAT MONAT
FROM BKPF INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_bkpf
WHERE BUKRS = 'XXX'
AND GJAHR = '2005'
AND BELNR = '0000000250'. "just for proof
AND MONAT = '10'
The above query returns me 1 row in program and in SE16 and then I make the next query for BSEG to do the join
SELECT BUKRS BELNR GJAHR BSCHL SHKZG WRBTR HKONT
FROM BSEG INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_BSEG
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_bkpf
WHERE bukrs = it_bkpf-bukrs
and gjahr = it_bkpf-gjahr
and belnr = it_bkpf-belnr.
this query returns 897 rows and in SE16 this same query returns 901 rows
Why SELECT...FOR ALL ENTRIES brings me less rows affected by the query in SE16
Thanks for your help!!Hi,
Please use the following code for selcting the exact number of rows.
IF it_bkpf[] IS NOT INITIAL.
SELECT *
FROM BSEG INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_BSEG
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_bkpf
WHERE bukrs = it_bkpf-bukrs
and gjahr = it_bkpf-gjahr
and belnr = it_bkpf-belnr.
ENDIF.
Instead of * ,you can specify the exact fields required along with all the key fields as selection fields.Also it is must to check the condition it_bkpf[] IS NOT INITIAL before using the statement FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_bkpf.Suppose if this condition is not used and if it_bkpf is initial,it will fetch all entries from the table.
Reward if helpful.
Regards,
Aravind -
Problem with for all entries in select querry
hi,
Hi,
I am using select queery like this
SELECT version COUNT( * )
from ztbi_default_va4
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_new
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
WHERE network = lit_new1-network GROUP BY version.
this is not working showing error as:
The addition "FOR ALL ENTRIES" excludes all aggregate functions with
the exception of "COUNT( * )" as the single element of the SELECT clause.
I am using only count(*) ,not using othes like max,min etc,,,,,,,,,
please suggest any missing in syntax,,,,attach relavant code using count(*) with for all entreis
any help appriciated,,,,,
Thanks in advance,,,,Hi,
Try this -
TYPES: begin of t_data,
version TYPE version,
count type i,
end of t_data.
DATA: i_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t_data,
wa_data TYPE t_data.
DATA: l_version TYPE version,
l_count TYPE i.
SELECT version COUNT( * )
from ztbi_default_va4
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE lit_new
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lit_new1
WHERE network = lit_new1-network.
SORT lit_new.
LOOP AT lit_new INTO lwa_new.
IF lwa_new EQ l_version.
l_count = l_count + 1.
ELSE.
wa_data-version = l_version.
wa_data-count = l_count + 1.
APPEND wa_data TO i_data.
CLEAR: wa_data.
CLEAR: l_count.
ENDIF.
l_version = lwa_new-version.
CLEAR: lwa_new.
I hope this will do.
Make any necessary changes.
Regards,
Harsh Bansal -
Problem in getting records using FOR ALL ENTRIES
Hi All,
I am bringing the employee details with required selection criteria into an internal master table IT_EMPDETAILS.
Now, I would want to fill the other columns of this internal table, using FOR ALL ENTRIES as below:
SELECT ZRCODE FROM PA9001
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_EMPDETAILS
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_EMPDETAILS
WHERE PERNR = IT_EMPDETAILS-PERNR
AND ENDDA = '99991231'.
but while i use this, it is actually clearing the IT_EMPDETAILS instead of filling the column of IT_EMPDETAILS table.
what could be going wrong??
Thanks in advance,
MohanDear All,
Thanks for the amazing replies, yesterday's world cup match is really doing wonders i guess!
To give more insight at what i am looking for and what is done so far:
I tried creating another Internal table and then filled that with only PERNR.
and then using that. tried to fill IT_EMPDETAILS internal table using for all entries,
alas it did not work, and it did not work with APPENDING CORRESPONDING either.
now, coming to using LOOP, if I use loop, I am going run the loop for 1lakh emp(approx..and going high everyday) and modify the internal table for 1lakh records. AND not only that, I am going to loop another 9 tables in similar manner. that is 9lakh loops AND thats not all,
after that I have to again loop the master internal table to loop and fill other employee details like 'text' instead of 'code' from a master table.
This is one of the most query intensive, realtime, online comprehensive employee report that i am making.
Appreciate replies from ABAP performance tuning experts and gurus in advance.
Cheers,
Mohan
Maybe you are looking for
-
I got this for Christmas and its one of the only convient ways to communicate with my aunt who is currently living in another country! Someone stole it and its not connected to wifi or online. This happened last week and I just got it 2 weeks ago but
-
Satellite A300 screen keeps jumping up and down
Hi, What is on my screen keeps jumping up and down, any thoughts, is this a problem with video card in Satellite A300?
-
Portles and Servlets in one application
I have a configuration file (xml) that I need to read and populate singleton. The first problem is How to perform initialization before any portlet will be started (similar like ServletContextListener). ? Do I need 2 archive files (*.war and *.par) i
-
Cisco/Linksys Router Vulnerabilities
Hello, I have an e3000 wireless router.. I am unable to disable wps on it. The WPS vulnerability was exposed in December 2011, along with the reaver tool to exploit it. https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/wifi-protected-setup-flaw-can-lead-compromise-
-
Enhancement for f.13 transaction....
hello friends, can any one help me in providing the exit for f.13 (clearing items).. regards, khan