FOR ALL ENTRIES stmnt. in SELECT query is not running properly

Hello experts,
          In my report program, I write one query on table BSIS.
         Internal table declaration -
       DATA : BEGIN OF DLC_BSIS OCCURS 0,
                        BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
                        GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
                        BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
                        SHKZG LIKE BSIS-SHKZG,
                        BSCHL LIKE BSIS-BSCHL,
                        AUFNR LIKE BSIS-AUFNR,
                        HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
                        QSSKZ LIKE BSIS-QSSKZ,
                        DMBTR LIKE BSIS-DMBTR,
                   END OF DLC_BSIS.
Query as follows --
         SELECT BUKRS
                       GJAHR
                       BELNR
                       AHKZG
                       BSCHL
                       AUFNR
                       HKONT
                       QSSKZ
                        DMBTR FROM BSIS
                                  INTO TABLE DLC_BSIS
                                 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_BKPF2
                                 WHERE BELNR = IT_BKPF2-BELNR
                                              AND BUKRS = IT_BKPF2-BUKRS
                                              AND GJAHR = IT_BKPF2-GJAHR.
IT_BKPF2 internal table having -- BUKRS - LT01
                                                     BELNR - 6400000061
                                                     GJAHR - 2009.
And in BSIS database table -- 3 entries are there for the above documnet.
But, in my internal only one entry has come for the same above document.
I think For all entries stmnt. is not running properly. But Why it's not running properly.??
What would be the reason..??
Thanks in advance....!!
Regards,
Poonam.

>
Poonam Patil wrote:
> Hello experts,
>           In my report program, I write one query on table BSIS.
>
>          Internal table declaration -
>
>        DATA : BEGIN OF DLC_BSIS OCCURS 0,
>                         BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
>                         GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
>                         BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
>                         SHKZG LIKE BSIS-SHKZG,
>                         BSCHL LIKE BSIS-BSCHL,
>                         AUFNR LIKE BSIS-AUFNR,
>                         HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
>                         QSSKZ LIKE BSIS-QSSKZ,
>                         DMBTR LIKE BSIS-DMBTR,
>                    END OF DLC_BSIS.
>
>          Query as follows --
>
>          SELECT BUKRS
>                        GJAHR
>                        BELNR
>                        AHKZG
>                        BSCHL
>                        AUFNR
>                        HKONT
>                        QSSKZ
>                         DMBTR FROM BSIS
>                                   INTO TABLE DLC_BSIS
>                                  FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_BKPF2
>                                  WHERE BELNR = IT_BKPF2-BELNR
>                                               AND BUKRS = IT_BKPF2-BUKRS
>                                               AND GJAHR = IT_BKPF2-GJAHR.
>
> IT_BKPF2 internal table having -- BUKRS - LT01
>                                                      BELNR - 6400000061
>                                                      GJAHR - 2009.
>
> And in BSIS database table -- 3 entries are there for the above documnet.
>
> But, in my internal only one entry has come for the same above document.
>
> I think For all entries stmnt. is not running properly. But Why it's not running properly.??
> What would be the reason..??
>
>
> Thanks in advance....!!
>
> Regards,
> Poonam.
include the buzei field in selection criteria i have faced the same situation earlier.
always select all the key fields.
varun

Similar Messages

Is "Joins & For all entries" in same SQL Query Possible?

Hi all Professional,
Can we use "Inner Joins" and "For All Entries In" in the same SQL Query. if possible then pls clarify this query.
Here I am using three Transparent Table and fetching data from them.
SELECT abukrs abelnr ahkont axref2 ashkzg awrbtr agsber azfbdt azterm amwskz asgtxt axref1 agjahr abuzei
           bkunnr bwerks bmenge bmeins bmatnr bkoart
           cbukrs cbelnr cblart cbldat cbudat cxblnr cgjahr cstgrd cstblg cstblg c~xreversal
           INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_bsid FROM ( ( bsid AS a
           INNER JOIN acctit AS b ON abukrs = bbukrs )
           INNER JOIN bkpf AS c ON cbukrs = abukrs
                               AND cbelnr = abelnr
                               AND cgjahr = agjahr )
           FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_bkpf
              WHERE
                a~belnr EQ it_bkpf-belnr
            AND a~gjahr EQ it_bkpf-gjahr
            AND a~bukrs EQ it_bkpf-bukrs
            AND a~gsber IN so_bus.
After executing this query, I'm getting Dump Error.
Error analysis
    When the program was running, it was established that more
    memory was needed than the operating system is able to provide savely.
    To avoid a system crash, you must prevent this
    situation.
               Last error logged in SAP kernel
    Component............ "EM"
    Place................ "SAP-Server Development_DVL_01 on host Development (wp
     2)"
    Version.............. 37
    Error code........... 7
    Error text........... "Warning: EM-Memory exhausted: Workprocess gets PRIV "
    Description.......... " "
    System call.......... " "
    Module............... "emxx.c"
    Line................. 1886
Pls resolve, if anybody knows.
Thanks
Devinder

Hi,
During testing i notice that splitting into multiple selects does improve performance. But the best performance I achieved using DB Hints instead of splitting the select statements.
Generally performance of joins together with for all entries is bad.
However if you will look into SAP note 1662726 you will notice that this issue (bad performance in using join and for all entries together) has been addressed.
Even though the note is for HANA DB, FM RSDU_CREATE_HINT_FAE can be used independent of DB.
On HANA DB performance improvement is huge (i achieved 62 seconds using DB Hints compared to 1656 seconds using for all entries). On Oracle DB the same code initially run in 99 seconds with for all entries and with DB Hints in 82 seconds for ~ 1.000.000 records and ~660 seconds compared to 1349 seconds for ~8.000.000 records..
Sample code from SAP Note below:
Original statement:
SELECT COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 COL5
FROM TAB1
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_RESULT
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN LT_SOURCE_TMP
WHERE COL3 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL3
AND   COL4 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL4
AND   COL5 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL5
Revision:
DATA: L_T_TABLNM TYPE RSDU_T_TABLNM,
      L_LINES TYPE I,
      L_HINT TYPE RSDU_HINT.
APPEND 'TAB1' TO L_T_TABLNM.
L_LINES = LINES( LT_SOURCE_TMP ).
CALL FUNCTION 'RSDU_CREATE_HINT_FAE'
EXPORTING
    I_T_TABLNM   = L_T_TABLNM
    I_FAE_FIELDS = 3
    I_FAE_LINES = L_LINES
    I_EQUI_JOIN = RS_C_TRUE
IMPORTING
    E_HINT       = L_HINT
EXCEPTIONS
    OTHERS       = 0.
SELECT COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 COL5
FROM TAB1
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_RESULT
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN LT_SOURCE_TMP
WHERE COL3 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL3
AND   COL4 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL4
AND   COL5 = LT_SOURCE_TMP-COL5
          %_HINTS ADABAS L_HINT.
Best regards,
Octavian

Why select query is not running on 10.2.0.2.0 but running on 10.2.0.1.0

Hi Friends,
The below given select statement is executing successfully in version
select * from v$version;
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
"CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production"
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
but NOT in version
select * from v$version;
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
"CORE     10.2.0.2.0     Production"
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
the error message is :
ORA-00904:"SSRP"."RESOURCE_ID" invalid identifier
Error at Line 12 : Column 40
SELECT SR.RESOURCE_NAME,
SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME,
MAX(NVL((SELECT NVL(CHECKED, UNCHECKED)
FROM
(SELECT 2 AS UNCHECKED,
(SELECT 1
FROM S_USAGE_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SURP
WHERE SURP.USAGE_PROFILE_ID = 1
AND SURP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID = SRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID) AS CHECKED
FROM S_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SRP
WHERE SRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID = SSRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID
AND SRP.RESOURCE_ID = SSRP.RESOURCE_ID
AND SRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_VAL = 4 )),0)) AS ALL_PERMISSION
FROM
S_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SSRP
INNER JOIN
S_RESOURCE SR ON SR.RESOURCE_ID = SSRP.RESOURCE_ID
INNER JOIN
S_RESOURCE_GROUP SRG ON SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_ID = SR.RESOURCE_GROUP_ID
GROUP BY SR.RESOURCE_NAME, SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME;
Given SCHEMA is similar in all respects at both the databases.
can someone suggest me what could be the problem?

Sorry, didn't look close enough, here a corrected query you can try to run.
If you still have problems, try to post a ddl scripts and small sample of data - this may do it easier for other to help you. When you post sql scripts, try as well to enclose them between [ pre ] [ pre ] or [ code ] [ code ] tags to increase readability.
WITH t AS (
SELECT NVL(CHECKED, UNCHECKED) NVL_CHECKED,
       RESOURCE_ID,
       RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID
FROM (SELECT 2 AS UNCHECKED,
               (SELECT 1
                  FROM S_USAGE_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SURP
                 WHERE SURP.USAGE_PROFILE_ID = 1
                   AND SURP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID =
                       SRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID) AS CHECKED,
               SRP.RESOURCE_ID,RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID
          FROM S_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SRP
         WHERE SRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_VAL = 4))
SELECT SR.RESOURCE_NAME,
       SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME,
       MAX(NVL_CHECKED) AS ALL_PERMISSION
FROM S_RESOURCE_PERMISSIONS SSRP INNER_JOIN T ON (T.RESOURCE_ID =
                                                   SSRP.RESOURCE_ID AND
                                                   T.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID =
                                                   SSRP.RESOURCE_PERMISSION_ID)
INNER JOIN S_RESOURCE SR ON SR.RESOURCE_ID = SSRP.RESOURCE_ID
INNER JOIN S_RESOURCE_GROUP SRG ON SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_ID =
                                    SR.RESOURCE_GROUP_ID
GROUP BY SR.RESOURCE_NAME, SRG.RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME;Best regards
Maxim

I have reset Firefox, followed all the various instructions for ALL the faults and it is STILL not working properly !

Various problems :
Firefox crashing, missing toolbar, bookmarks disappeared (reset and now they won't work at all) , cannot set homepage again (despite following all instructions), shockwave flash constantly unresponsive (again, all instructions followed and no change), Firefox especially slow in facebook, sound volume keeps switching itself off.
I have gone through each problem with all the suggested "fixes" AND reset Firefox, but it is worse now than before !
Just about had enough.

If you have submitted crash reports then please post the IDs of one or more recent crash reports that have a "bp-" prefix:
*bp-xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
You can find the IDs of the submitted crash reports on the about:crashes page.
*You can open the about:crashes page via the location bar, like you open a website, or open the crash reports page via "Help > Troubleshooting Information".
See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Mozilla_Crash_Reporter
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Mozilla+Crash+Reporter
You can check for problems with current Flash plugin versions and try these:
*disable a possible RealPlayer Browser Record Plugin extension for Firefox and update the RealPlayer if installed
*disable protected mode in the Flash plugin (Flash 11.3+ on Windows Vista and later)
*disable hardware acceleration in the Flash plugin
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Flash#Troubleshooting

Select SUM in FOR ALL ENTRIES Select Query

Hi ,
I am using for all entries select statment ,can any one guide me how can i use SUM in the select statment with for all entries .
Regards,
Veera

Hi,
THis is not possible using for all entries.
Thanks,
Sriram Ponna.

How does select stmt with for all entries uses Indexes

Hello all,
I goes through a number of documents but still confused how does select for all entries uses indexes if fields are not in sequences. i got pretty much the same results if i take like two cases on Hr tables HRP1000 and HRP1001(with for all entries based upon hrp1000). Here is the sequence of index fields on hrp1001 (MANDT, OTYPE, OBJID, PLVAR, RSIGN, RELAT, ISTAT, PRIOX, BEGDA, ENDDA, VARYF, SEQNR). in second case objid field is in sequence as in defined Index but i dont see significant increase in field even though the number of records are around 30000. My question is does it make a differrence to use field sequence (same as in table indexes) in comparison to redundant field sequence (not same as defined in table indexes), secondly how we can ge tto know if table index is used in Select for entries query i tried Explain in ST05 but its not clear if it uses any index at all in hrp1001 read.
here is the sample code i use to get test results.
test case 1
REPORT zdemo_perf_select.
DATA: it_hrp1000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1007 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1007 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0002 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0002 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_10 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_20 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: t1 TYPE timestampl,
 t2 TYPE timestampl,
 t3 TYPE timestampl
SELECT * FROM hrp1000 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1000 bypassing buffer
 WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
 plvar EQ '01' AND
 otype EQ 'S'AND
 istat EQ '1' AND
 begda <= sy-datum AND
 endda >= sy-datum AND
 langu EQ 'EN'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t1.
SELECT * FROM hrp1001 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1001 bypassing buffer
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_hrp1000
 WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
 otype EQ 'S' AND
* objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid and
 plvar EQ '01' AND
 rsign EQ 'B' AND
 relat EQ '007' AND
 istat EQ '1' AND
 begda LT sy-datum AND
 endda GT sy-datum and
 sclas EQ 'C' and
 objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid.
* %_hints mssqlnt 'INDEX(HRP1001~0)'.
*delete it_hrp1001 where sclas ne 'C'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t2.
t3 = t1 - t2.
WRITE: 'Time taken - ', t3.
test case 2
REPORT zdemo_perf_select.
DATA: it_hrp1000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_hrp1007 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF hrp1007 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0000 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0001 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0002 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0002 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_10 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: it_pa0105_20 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF pa0105 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: t1 TYPE timestampl,
 t2 TYPE timestampl,
 t3 TYPE timestampl
SELECT * FROM hrp1000 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1000 bypassing buffer
 WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
 plvar EQ '01' AND
 otype EQ 'S'AND
 istat EQ '1' AND
 begda <= sy-datum AND
 endda >= sy-datum AND
 langu EQ 'EN'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t1.
SELECT * FROM hrp1001 CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO TABLE it_hrp1001 bypassing buffer
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_hrp1000
 WHERE mandt EQ sy-mandt AND
 otype EQ 'S' AND
 objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid and
 plvar EQ '01' AND
 rsign EQ 'B' AND
 relat EQ '007' AND
 istat EQ '1' AND
 begda LT sy-datum AND
 endda GT sy-datum and
 sclas EQ 'C'." and
* objid EQ it_hrp1000-objid.
* %_hints mssqlnt 'INDEX(HRP1001~0)'.
*delete it_hrp1001 where sclas ne 'C'.
GET TIME STAMP FIELD t2.
t3 = t1 - t2.
WRITE: 'Time taken - ', t3.

Mani wrote:
Thank you for your answer, its very helpful but i am still nor sure how does parameter rsdb/max_blocking_factor affect records size.
Hi,
The blocking affects the size of the statement and the memory structures for returning the result.
So if your itab has 500 rows and your blocking is 5, the very same statement will be executed 100 times.
Nothing good or bad about this so far.
Assume, your average result for an inlist 5 statement is 25 records with an average size of 109 bytes.
You average result size will be 2725 byte plus overhead which will nearly perfectly fit into two 1500 byte ethernet frames.
Nothing to do in this case.
Assume your average result for an inlist 5 statement is 7 records with an average size of 67 bytes.
You average result size will be ~ 470 byte plus overhead which will only fill 1/3 of a 1500 byte ethernet frame.
In this case, setting the blocking to 12 ... 15 will give you 66% network transfer performance gain,
and reduces the number of calls to the DB by 50%, giving additional benefit.
Now this is an extreme example. The longer the average row length is, the lower will be the average loss in the network.
You have the same effects in memory structures, but on that layer you are fighting single micro seconds instead of
hundreds of these, so in real life it is rarely measurable.
Depending on table-statistics, oracle might decide for short inlists to use a concatanation instead of an inlist.
This is supposed to be more costy, but I never had a case where I could proove a big difference.
Values from 5 to 15 for blocking seem to be ok for me. If you have special statements in customer coding,
it #might# be benefitial to do the mentioned calculations and do some network tracing to see if you can squeeze your
network efficiency by tuning the blocking.
If you have jumbo frames enabled, it might be worth to be analyzed as well.
If you are only on a DB-CI system that is loopback connected to the DB, I doubt there might be a big outcome.
Hope this helps
Volker

For all entries with 2 internal table

HI experts.
How to use 2 for all entries in a select statement.
Below refer to my below code.
select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
it_lips for all entries in it_likp   where
              vbeln = it_likp-vbeln and
              matnr = it_mara-matnr.
I want to add another for all entries it_mara.
Please help me .Thanks in advanced.

hi,
it is possible....
use this query...
declare another internal table of the same type as it_lips.
data : it_lips_final like it_lips.
select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
it_lips for all entries in it_likp where
vbeln = it_likp-vbeln .
loop at it_lips.
read table it_mara into it_mara with key matnr = it_lips-matnr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
    append it_lips to it_lips_final.
endif.
endloop.
refresh it_lips[].
it_lips[] = it_lips_final[]
what the above code does is selects all the entries of vbeln from lips and filters it in the loop reading it from mara checking for matnr value and finally
all the entries according to your requirement is there in it_lips_final which we move it to it_lips again...
this is something similar to writing a for all entries for 2 table.... but in another fashion
Regards
Siddarth

Problem in getting records using FOR ALL ENTRIES

Hi All,
I am bringing the employee details with required selection criteria into an internal master table IT_EMPDETAILS.
Now, I would want to fill the other columns of this internal table, using FOR ALL ENTRIES as below:
SELECT ZRCODE FROM PA9001
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_EMPDETAILS
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_EMPDETAILS
WHERE PERNR = IT_EMPDETAILS-PERNR
AND ENDDA = '99991231'.
but while i use this, it is actually clearing the IT_EMPDETAILS instead of filling the column of IT_EMPDETAILS table.
what could be going wrong??
Thanks in advance,
Mohan

Dear All,
Thanks for the amazing replies, yesterday's world cup match is really doing wonders i guess!
To give more insight at what i am looking for and what is done so far:
I tried creating another Internal table and then filled that with only PERNR.
and then using that. tried to fill IT_EMPDETAILS internal table using for all entries,
alas it did not work, and it did not work with APPENDING CORRESPONDING either.
now, coming to using LOOP, if I use loop, I am going run the loop for 1lakh emp(approx..and going high everyday) and modify the internal table for 1lakh records. AND not only that, I am going to loop another 9 tables in similar manner. that is 9lakh loops AND thats not all,
after that I have to again loop the master internal table to loop and fill other employee details like 'text' instead of 'code' from a master table.
This is one of the most query intensive, realtime, online comprehensive employee report that i am making.
Appreciate replies from ABAP performance tuning experts and gurus in advance.
Cheers,
Mohan

Max no of records in for all entries table

Hello all,
Hi have used for all entries in a select statement in BW extractor. This extractor is working fine for the test data. When i moved this code to pre-production for testing, there this extractor has to deal with thousands of records. In pre-prod , this select statement is not picking up all the records available in DB. Can any one give any idea on behavior of for all entries for large number of records. and is the any max limit for for all entries table.
Thank you..correct answer will be rewarded.
Regards
Sravan

Moderator message - Please search before asking and do not offer rewards (particularly since as far as I can see, you've awarded a total of two points in the last two years - post locked
Rob

FOR ALL ENTRIES IN with two tables

Hi Guy's,
I have two int. tables, gt_likp, gt_lips.
I need to use "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN" with this two tables.
SELECT matnr
 vkorg
 vtweg
 ypcogsl
 FROM mvke
 INTO TABLE gt_mvke
 "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_likp gt_lips"
 WHERE matnr = gwa_liefpos_tab-matnr
 AND vkorg = gt_likp-vkorg
 AND vtweg = gt_lips-vtweg.
How to do this?
Please Help.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Fill gt_likp-vkorg values in a range(r_vkorg). Use gt_lips in FOR ALL ENTRIES.
Basically you can use only 1 internal table with FOR ALL ENTRIES statement.
SELECT matnr
vkorg
vtweg
ypcogsl
FROM mvke
INTO TABLE gt_mvke
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_lips
WHERE matnr = gwa_liefpos_tab-matnr
AND vkorg in r_vkorg
AND vtweg = gt_lips-vtweg.
- SRao

Populating Empty Fields for Existing Internal Table Using For All Entries

I have an internal table called itab_extract that populates without any issues in SELECT A and SELECT B below. Trying to avoid looping, I am using select DB table 'for all entries' in itab_extract. I want the empty fields in itab_extract to populate from the values in the database. However, about 200,000 entries are being appended to the table, and, the values that existed for the already populated fields in itab_extract are gone, and the new fields are populated.
I've played with the syntax and cannot seem to get it to work. My next option is a time consuming loop.
How should the for all entries syntax look to accomplish filling the empty fields in the itab?   Thank-You
*read ekko
    select ebeln lifnr aedat bsart from ekko                                                     *SELECT A*
           into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE me->itab_extract
           where aedat in r_aedat.
    select ebeln lifnr aedat BSART from ekko                                                  *SELECT B*
           appending CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE me->itab_extract
           where aedat in S_DATE2 AND
                 BSART IN S_BSART.
      select ebelp werks matnr                                                                           *SELECT C*
        into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab_extract
        from ekpo
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab_extract
        where ebeln = itab_extract-ebeln.

Hi Tom,
           This SQL statement will be time consuming, Do not use a loop.
There are two options.
1. Select EKKO and EKPO details based on standard SAP view. (You can type EKKO in se11 view to find the correct view).
    also use one range table populate r_aedat and s_date2 in the same. So you where condition will have r_newrange and
    s_bsart. Also do not use into corresponding fields, it is not a good idea. It will increase your performance. Maintain the proper
    sequence (Based on database structure of EKKO and EKPO)
2. If you are keen to use for all entries, then first select ekko then after your sy-subrc check get the data from EKPO.
Should be like this.
select ebeln bsart aedat lifnr from ekko into table gt_ekko where aedat in r_newrange and bsart in s_bsart.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
sort gt_ekko by ebeln ascending.
select ebeln ebelp werks matnr into table gt_ekpo for all entries in gt_ekko where ebeln eq gt_ekko-ebeln.
endif.
Hope it helps,
Best Regards,
Tapodipta Khan.

Hi All,Pre-requisite of using FOR ALL ENTRIES

Hi All,
         What are the Pre-requisite of using FOR ALL ENTRIES in the select statement .pls its Urgent .
thanks&regards.
Bharat

hi,
For using for all entries in below statement for all entries in itab_mara it will retrieve record corresponding fields of table itab_marc.
In this case if we have duplicate records in mara .For that also it will retrieve the value in itab_marc.
select matnr erdat from table itab_mara where matnr in s_matnr.
if not itab_mara is initial.
select matnr werks from table itab_marc for all entries of table itab_mara
                                                      where werks in s_werks and
                                                                matnr in s_matnr.
Reward with points if helpful.

FOR ALL ENTRIES - CDHDR / CDPOS Tables

Hi,
I know there have been a lot of threads concerning the "for all entries" statement. Nevertheless I got a problem downloading the change document tables CDHDR/CDPOS with this statement and I haven't found anything in this forum regarding this special issue.
While trying the for all entries statement in the below manner for downloading first CDHDR and then the CDPOS for all entries of the selected CDHDR it took 3 days and didn't finish, so we aborted the ABAP. The JOIN statement doesn't work in a 4.6c environment for the Cluster tables, hence this isn't an option.
Can you give me some advise of how to improve downloading those tables in this way:
1. Download CDHDR with limitation of fields OBJECTCLAS and UDATE
2. Then Download CDPOS for all CHANGENR out of the first selection of CDHDR
This was the way I tried it:
SELECT
ACT_CHNGNO CHANGE_IND CHANGENR MANDANT OBJECTCLAS OBJECTID PLANCHNGNR TCODE UDATE USERNAME UTIME WAS_PLANND APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE T_CDHDR FROM CDHDR WHERE UDATE IN s_UDAT1 AND OBJECTCLAS IN s_OBJE0.
ENDSELECT.
SELECT
CHANGENR CHNGIND CUKY_NEW CUKY_OLD FNAME MANDANT OBJECTCLAS OBJECTID TABKEY TABNAME UNIT_NEW UNIT_OLD VALUE_NEW VALUE_OLD INTO gs_CDPOS FROM CDPOS CLIENT SPECIFIED for all entries in T_CDHDR WHERE OBJECTCLAS IN s_OBJE2 AND MANDANT EQ T_CDHDR-MANDANT AND OBJECTCLAS EQ T_CDHDR-OBJECTCLAS AND CHANGENR EQ T_CDHDR-CHANGENR.
ENDSELECT.

THis prg might b usefull to u
* Mass display or print Purchase Order History
* You can request report by :
* 1. Change date
* 2. User Name
* 3. Purchase Order Number
* 4. Vendor Code
* Written by : SAP Basis, ABAP Programming and Other IMG Stuff
* http://www.sap-img.com
REPORT ZPOCHANGE LINE-SIZE 132 NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING
 LINE-COUNT 065(001)
 MESSAGE-ID VR.
TABLES: DD04T,
 CDHDR,
 CDPOS,
 DD03L,
 DD41V,
 T685T,
 VBPA,
 TPART,
 KONVC,
 EKKO.
SELECT-OPTIONS: XUDATE FOR CDHDR-UDATE,
 XNAME FOR CDHDR-USERNAME,
 XEBELN FOR EKKO-EBELN,
 XLIFNR FOR EKKO-LIFNR.
SELECTION-SCREEN SKIP.
* TEXT-001 - Sorting Sequence
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK BLK1 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-001.
PARAMETERS: SUDATE RADIOBUTTON GROUP R1,
 SNAME RADIOBUTTON GROUP R1,
 SOBID RADIOBUTTON GROUP R1.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK BLK1.
DATA: WFLAG,
 WCHANGENR LIKE CDHDR-CHANGENR.
DATA: INDTEXT(60) TYPE C.
DATA: BEGIN OF ICDHDR OCCURS 50.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE CDHDR.
DATA: END OF ICDHDR.
DATA: BEGIN OF ICDSHW OCCURS 50.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE CDSHW.
DATA: END OF ICDSHW.
DATA: BEGIN OF EKKEY,
 EBELN LIKE EKET-EBELN,
 EBELP LIKE EKET-EBELP,
 ETENR LIKE EKET-ETENR,
 END OF EKKEY.
DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB OCCURS 50,
 BEGIN OF EKKEY,
 EBELN LIKE EKET-EBELN,
 EBELP LIKE EKET-EBELP,
 ETENR LIKE EKET-ETENR,
 END OF EKKEY,
 CHANGENR LIKE CDHDR-CHANGENR,
 UDATE LIKE CDHDR-UDATE,
 UTIME LIKE CDHDR-UTIME,
 USERNAME LIKE CDHDR-USERNAME,
 CHNGIND LIKE CDSHW-CHNGIND,
 FTEXT LIKE CDSHW-FTEXT,
 OUTLEN LIKE CDSHW-OUTLEN,
 F_OLD LIKE CDSHW-F_OLD,
 F_NEW LIKE CDSHW-F_NEW,
 END OF ITAB.
DATA: OLD_OBJECTID LIKE CDHDR-OBJECTID.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <F_OLD>, <F_NEW>.
SELECT * FROM EKKO WHERE EBELN IN XEBELN AND
 LIFNR IN XLIFNR.
CLEAR CDHDR.
CLEAR CDPOS.
CDHDR-OBJECTCLAS = 'EINKBELEG'.
CDHDR-OBJECTID = EKKO-EBELN.
PERFORM GETCHGDOCS.
ENDSELECT.
IF SUDATE = 'X'.
SORT ITAB BY UDATE EKKEY-EBELN CHANGENR EKKEY-EBELP
 EKKEY-ETENR.
ELSEIF SNAME = 'X'.
SORT ITAB BY USERNAME EKKEY-EBELN CHANGENR EKKEY-EBELP
 EKKEY-ETENR.
ELSE.
SORT ITAB BY EKKEY-EBELN CHANGENR EKKEY-EBELP EKKEY-ETENR.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT ITAB.
CLEAR: INDTEXT, EKKEY.
CASE ITAB-CHNGIND.
 WHEN 'U'.
 INDTEXT(50) = ITAB-FTEXT.
 INDTEXT+51 = TEXT-020.
 CONDENSE INDTEXT.
 WHEN 'D'.
 INDTEXT = TEXT-021.
 WHEN 'E'.
 INDTEXT(5) = ITAB-FTEXT.
 INDTEXT+51 = TEXT-021.
 CONDENSE INDTEXT.
 WHEN 'I'.
 INDTEXT = TEXT-022.
 ENDCASE.
 RESERVE 4 LINES.
 IF WCHANGENR NE ITAB-CHANGENR.
 WCHANGENR = ITAB-CHANGENR.
 EKKEY = ITAB-EKKEY.
 WRITE:/ ITAB-UDATE UNDER 'Change Date',
 ITAB-UTIME UNDER 'Time',
 ITAB-USERNAME UNDER 'User Name',
 ITAB-EKKEY-EBELN UNDER 'PO No',
 ITAB-EKKEY-EBELP UNDER 'Item',
 ITAB-EKKEY-ETENR UNDER 'Sch No',
 INDTEXT UNDER 'Changes'.
 ELSEIF ITAB-EKKEY NE EKKEY.
 WRITE:/ ITAB-EKKEY-EBELP UNDER 'Item',
 ITAB-EKKEY-ETENR UNDER 'Sch No',
 INDTEXT UNDER 'Changes'.
 ENDIF.
 CASE ITAB-CHNGIND.
 WHEN 'U'.
 ASSIGN ITAB-F_OLD(ITAB-OUTLEN) TO <F_OLD>.
 ASSIGN ITAB-F_NEW(ITAB-OUTLEN) TO <F_NEW>.
 WRITE: / TEXT-023 UNDER 'Changes',
 <F_OLD>.
 WRITE: / TEXT-024 UNDER 'Changes',
 <F_NEW>.
 WHEN 'E'.
 ASSIGN ITAB-F_OLD(ITAB-OUTLEN) TO <F_OLD>.
 WRITE: TEXT-023 UNDER 'Changes',
 <F_OLD>.
 ENDCASE.
 SKIP.
ENDLOOP.
TOP-OF-PAGE.
WRITE:/ SY-DATUM,SY-UZEIT,
 50 'P U R C H A S E O R D E R H I S T O R Y',
 120 'Page', SY-PAGNO.
WRITE: / SY-REPID,
 60 'Purchase Orders Changes'.
SKIP.
ULINE.
IF SUDATE = 'X'.
WRITE:/001 'Change Date',
 014 'Time',
 024 'User Name',
 038 'PO No',
 050 'Item',
 057 'Sch No',
 065 'Changes'.
ELSEIF SOBID = 'X'.
WRITE:/001 'PO No',
 013 'Item',
 020 'Sch No',
 028 'Change Date',
 041 'Time',
 051 'User Name',
 065 'Changes'.
ELSE.
WRITE:/001 'User Name',
 015 'Change Date',
 028 'Time',
 038 'PO No',
 050 'Item',
 057 'Sch No',
 065 'Changes'.
ENDIF.
ULINE.
FORM GETCHGDOCS.
CALL FUNCTION 'CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ_HEADERS'
 EXPORTING
 DATE_OF_CHANGE = CDHDR-UDATE
 OBJECTCLASS = CDHDR-OBJECTCLAS
 OBJECTID = CDHDR-OBJECTID
 TIME_OF_CHANGE = CDHDR-UTIME
 USERNAME = CDHDR-USERNAME
 TABLES
 I_CDHDR = ICDHDR
 EXCEPTIONS
 NO_POSITION_FOUND = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
CHECK SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
DELETE ICDHDR WHERE CHANGE_IND EQ 'I'.
CHECK NOT ICDHDR[] IS INITIAL.
LOOP AT ICDHDR.
 CHECK ICDHDR-UDATE IN XUDATE.
 CHECK ICDHDR-USERNAME IN XNAME.
 CALL FUNCTION 'CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ_POSITIONS'
 EXPORTING CHANGENUMBER = ICDHDR-CHANGENR
 IMPORTING HEADER = CDHDR
 TABLES EDITPOS = ICDSHW
 EXCEPTIONS NO_POSITION_FOUND = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
 CHECK SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
 LOOP AT ICDSHW.
 CHECK ICDSHW-TEXT_CASE EQ SPACE.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING ICDSHW TO ITAB.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING ICDHDR TO ITAB.
 MOVE ICDSHW-TABKEY+3 TO ITAB-EKKEY.
 APPEND ITAB.
 ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.
* END OF PROGRAM

Using aggregate function along with for all entries: sugest alternative

My requirement:
For each record in i_vbap for which 'charg' is initial, need to determine batch using the following logic:
For the material (MATNR) in i_vbap, select the batch (CHARG) which has the largest (MAX) unrestricted inventory quantity (CLABS) from MCHB table.
How do I implement this logic without using select statement inside a loop as I cannot use MAX ( CLABS ) function along with FOR ALL ENTRIES in a SELECT?
Suggest an alternative.

For each record in i_vbap for which 'charg' is initial ,fetch all the existing 'clabs' value.
[ Remember to include all the key fields in selct ]
Sort the new table .
Put a loop,use at end of 'charg' and append to another table. U get ur solution
I think this should be the most economic way to do so.

For All entries in

Dear Abapers,
I want to get all the records from COEP table on the basis of record selected from AFPO table. Its very very slow , some times SAP Clicked out from the report. Pl. help.
In AFPO -> AUFNR field links to OBJNR field for that I have to Pass OR+Aufnr for check.
regards
Vikas

The reason for the poor performance of your COEP select is that you are not supplying sufficient fields for it to use an existing index or the table key, and therefore the database will be performing a table scan for each record.
To read COEP based on OBJNR you need to select with LEDNR and OBJNR supplied in your WHERE block. You will most likely find that LEDNR has a fixed value (probably '00') - specifying this as well as the OBJNR will speed up the select.
Looking at COEP inxedes, it looks like index 2 would allow select using OBJNR without needing LEDNR, but SAP delivers index 2 and 4 of the COEP table flagged as "No Database Index" so they do not really exist and cannot be used without creating them (a repair to the table). So this leaves only index 1 as a real index, and it needs the additional field provided.
So your process would be:
1. Read AFPO and populate internal tabel.
2. Loop at internal table and set up extra OBJNR field as 'OR'+Aufnr
3. Check internal table is not empty
4. Read COEP using FOR ALL ENTRIES and both LEDNR and OBJNR fields
NB: make sure you read all three key COEP fields KOKRS, BELNR, BUZEI to avoid loss of duplicates due to FOR ALL ENTRIES behaving like "SELECT DISTINCT".
Andrew

FOR ALL ENTRIES stmnt. in SELECT query is not running properly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for