Foreign Key Locking Record

In Form6i
Master Table Party (Party.fmx)
PartyCode,
Partyname
Transaction Table ( trans.fmx)
TNo,
TDate,
PartyCode,
Amount
one user is editing record in party
can other user insert or edit record in transaction form ?

Not sure this is the issue you are experiencing but here is my guess:
In Forms default behvior is to build an update statment for all db columns in the datablock, regardless of whether user changed those columns or not. So in your sample if the user updates the Amount column you might expect the update to be along the lines of the following pseudo code:
update transaction_table
set Amount = bind variable for amount field
where rownum = bind variable for current record
However, what it actually does is:
update transaction_table
set TNo = bind variable for TNo field,
TDate = bind variable for TDate field,
PartyCode = bind variable for PartyCode field,
Amount = bind variable for amount field
where rownum = bind variable for current record
So even though these fields were NOT changed they are included in the Forms update statement and the fact that you are updating the foreign key, PartyCode, column causes the db to get a lock on the Master Party table to validate the foreign key relationship. The way around this behaviour is the "Update Changed Columns Only" property at the block level in your form; if you set this property to "Yes" then it should prevent the update statement from including columns that the user did not change in the form.
The gotcha here is db trigger processing and keeping form data in synch with anything a trigger changed, I have seen some strange issues with triggers when doing this so if there are triggers on your transaction_table make sure they still behave as expected.
Again, not sure if this is what you are experiencing; hope it helps.
Wendell

Similar Messages

  • How to insert a new record to table with foreign key

    I have 3 tables like this :
    CREATE TABLE PERSON (
    PK INTEGER NOT NULL,
    NAME VARCHAR(10),
    SSNUM INTEGER,
    MGR INTEGER);
    ALTER TABLE PERSON ADD CONSTRAINT PK_PERSON PRIMARY KEY (PK);
    ALTER TABLE PERSON ADD CONSTRAINT FK_PERSON FOREIGN KEY (MGR) REFERENCES
    PERSON (PK);
    /* Tables
    CREATE TABLE PROJECT (
    PK INTEGER NOT NULL,
    CODE_NAME INTEGER);
    ALTER TABLE PROJECT ADD CONSTRAINT PK_PROJECT PRIMARY KEY (PK);
    /* Tables
    CREATE TABLE XREF (
    PERSON INTEGER NOT NULL,
    PROJECT INTEGER NOT NULL);
    ALTER TABLE XREF ADD CONSTRAINT PK_XREF PRIMARY KEY (PERSON, PROJECT);
    ALTER TABLE XREF ADD CONSTRAINT FK_XREF1 FOREIGN KEY (PERSON) REFERENCES
    PERSON (PK);
    ALTER TABLE XREF ADD CONSTRAINT FK_XREF2 FOREIGN KEY (PROJECT) REFERENCES
    PROJECT (PK);
    I do like the way of "ReverseTutoral" and the file .jdo here :
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <jdo>
    <package name="reversetutorial">
    <class name="Person" objectid-class="PersonId">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="class-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="lock-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="PERSON"/>
    <field name="name">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="NAME"/>
    </field>
    <field name="person">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="pk-data-column"
    value="MGR"/>
    </field>
    <field name="persons">
    <collection element-type="Person"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse"
    value="person"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner"
    value="person"/>
    </field>
    <field name="pk" primary-key="true">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="PK"/>
    </field>
    <field name="ssnum">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="SSNUM"/>
    </field>
    <field name="xrefs">
    <collection element-type="Xref"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse"
    value="person"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner"
    value="person"/>
    </field>
    </class>
    <class name="Project" objectid-class="ProjectId">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="class-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="lock-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="PROJECT"/>
    <field name="codeName">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="CODE_NAME"/>
    </field>
    <field name="pk" primary-key="true">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="PK"/>
    </field>
    <field name="xrefs">
    <collection element-type="Xref"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse"
    value="project"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="inverse-owner"
    value="project"/>
    </field>
    </class>
    <class name="Xref" objectid-class="XrefId">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="class-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="lock-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="table" value="XREF"/>
    <field name="person">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="pk-data-column"
    value="PERSON"/>
    </field>
    <field name="person2" primary-key="true">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="PERSON"/>
    </field>
    <field name="project">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="pk-data-column"
    value="PROJECT"/>
    </field>
    <field name="project2" primary-key="true">
    <extension vendor-name="kodo" key="data-column"
    value="PROJECT"/>
    </field>
    </class>
    </package>
    </jdo>
    Data of those tables are :
    PERSON :
    | PK | NAME | SSNUM | MGR |
    | 1 | ABC | 1 | 1 |
    | 2 | DEF | 5 | 1 |
    PROJECT
    | PK | CODE_NAME |
    | 1 | 12 |
    | 2 | 13 |
    And now I want to add a new record into table XREF : insert into XREF
    values (1,1);
    public void createData() {
    Xref xref = new Xref();
    Person person = new Person(1);
    Project project = new Project(1);
    xref.setPerson(person);
    xref.setProject(project);
    person.getXrefs().add(xref);
    person.getXrefs().add(xref);
    pm.currentTransaction().begin();
    pm.makePersistent(xref);
    pm.currentTransaction().commit();
    I don't know why Kodo automatically insert new record to table PERSON ->
    confilct Primary Key. The errors are :
    0 [main] INFO kodo.Runtime - Starting Kodo JDO version 2.4.1
    (kodojdo-2.4.1-20030126-1556) with capabilities: [Enterprise Edition
    Features, Standard Edition Features, Lite Edition Features, Evaluation
    License, Query Extensions, Datacache Plug-in, Statement Batching, Global
    Transactions, Developer Tools, Custom Database Dictionaries, Enterprise
    Databases, Custom ClassMappings, Custom ResultObjectProviders]
    41 [main] WARN kodo.Runtime - WARNING: Kodo JDO Evaluation expires in 29
    days. Please contact [email protected] for information on extending
    your evaluation period or purchasing a license.
    1627 [main] INFO kodo.MetaData -
    com.solarmetric.kodo.meta.JDOMetaDataParser@e28b9: parsing source:
    file:/D:/AN/Test/classes/reversetutorial/reversetutorial.jdo
    3092 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:23387093; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] open:
    jdbc:firebirdsql:localhost/3050:D:/An/test/temp.gdb (sysdba)
    3325 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:23387093; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    close:
    com.solarmetric.datasource.PoolConnection@164dbd5[[requests=0;size=0;max=70;hits=0;created=0;redundant=0;overflow=0;new=0;leaked=0;unavailable=0]]
    3335 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:23387093; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] close
    connection
    3648 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - Using dictionary class
    "com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.schema.dict.InterbaseDictionary" to
    connect to "Firebird" (version "__WI-V6.2.972 Firebird 1.0.3)WI-V6.2.972
    Firebird 1.0.3/tcp (annm)/P10") with JDBC driver "firebirdsql jca/jdbc
    resource adapter" (version "0.1")
    4032 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] open:
    jdbc:firebirdsql:localhost/3050:D:/An/test/temp.gdb (sysdba)
    4143 [main] INFO jdbc.SQL - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    preparing statement <3098834>: INSERT INTO XREF(PERSON, PROJECT) VALUES
    4224 [main] INFO jdbc.SQL - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    executing statement <3098834>: [reused=1;params={(int)1,(int)1}]
    4244 [main] INFO jdbc.SQL - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    preparing statement <9090824>: INSERT INTO PERSON(MGR, NAME, PK, SSNUM)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
    4315 [main] INFO jdbc.SQL - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    executing statement <9090824>: [reused=1;params={null,null,(int)1,(int)0}]
    4598 [main] WARN jdbc.JDBC - java.sql.SQLWarning: java.sql.SQLWarning:
    resultSetType or resultSetConcurrency changed
    4598 [main] WARN jdbc.JDBC - java.sql.SQLWarning: java.sql.SQLWarning:
    resultSetType or resultSetConcurrency changed
    4598 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] begin
    rollback
    4608 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] end
    rollback 10ms
    4628 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ]
    close:
    com.solarmetric.datasource.PoolConnection@1878144[[requests=2;size=2;max=70;hits=0;created=2;redundant=0;overflow=0;new=2;leaked=0;unavailable=0]]
    4628 [main] INFO jdbc.JDBC - [ C:25657668; T:19356985; D:10268916 ] close
    connection
    javax.jdo.JDOFatalDataStoreException:
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptionWrapper:
    [SQL=INSERT INTO PERSON(MGR, NAME, PK, SSNUM) VALUES (null, null, 1, 0)]
    [PRE=INSERT INTO PERSON(MGR, NAME, PK, SSNUM) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)]
    GDS Exception. violation of PRIMARY or UNIQUE KEY constraint "PK_PERSON"
    on table "PERSON" [code=335544665;state=null]
    NestedThrowables:
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptionWrapper:
    [SQL=INSERT INTO PERSON(MGR, NAME, PK, SSNUM) VALUES (null, null, 1, 0)]
    [PRE=INSERT INTO PERSON(MGR, NAME, PK, SSNUM) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)]
    GDS Exception. violation of PRIMARY or UNIQUE KEY constraint "PK_PERSON"
    on table "PERSON"
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.SQLExceptions.throwFatal(SQLExceptions.java:17)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.JDBCStoreManager.flush(JDBCStoreManager.java:416)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.flush(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:575)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.commit(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:438)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.createData(Finder.java:74)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.main(Finder.java:141)
    NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBSQLException: GDS Exception. violation of PRIMARY
    or UNIQUE KEY constraint "PK_PERSON" on table "PERSON"
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBPreparedStatement.internalExecute(FBPreparedStatement.java:425)
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(FBPreparedStatement.java:136)
    at
    com.solarmetric.datasource.PreparedStatementWrapper.executeUpdate(PreparedStatementWrapper.java:111)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executePreparedStatementNonBatch(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:542)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executePreparedStatement(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:511
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executeInternal(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:405)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.flush(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:272
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.JDBCStoreManager.flush(JDBCStoreManager.java:411)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.flush(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:575)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.commit(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:438)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.createData(Finder.java:74)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.main(Finder.java:141)
    at org.firebirdsql.gds.GDSException: violation of PRIMARY or UNIQUE KEY
    constraint "PK_PERSON" on table "PERSON
    at org.firebirdsql.jgds.GDS_Impl.readStatusVector(GDS_Impl.java:1683)
    at org.firebirdsql.jgds.GDS_Impl.receiveResponse(GDS_Impl.java:1636)
    at org.firebirdsql.jgds.GDS_Impl.isc_dsql_execute2(GDS_Impl.java:865)
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jca.FBManagedConnection.executeStatement(FBManagedConnection.java:782)
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBConnection.executeStatement(FBConnection.java:1072)
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBPreparedStatement.internalExecute(FBPreparedStatement.java:420)
    at
    org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(FBPreparedStatement.java:136)
    at
    com.solarmetric.datasource.PreparedStatementWrapper.executeUpdate(PreparedStatementWrapper.java:111)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executePreparedStatementNonBatch(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:542)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executePreparedStatement(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:511)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.executeInternal(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:405)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.SQLExecutionManagerImpl.flush(SQLExecutionManagerImpl.java:272)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.JDBCStoreManager.flush(JDBCStoreManager.java:411)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.flush(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:575)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.commit(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:438)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.createData(Finder.java:74)
    at reversetutorial.Finder.main(Finder.java:141)
    Exception in thread "main"

    First off, use the '-primaryKeyOnJoin true' flag when running the reverse
    mapping tool so that you can get rid of that useless Xref class and have
    a direct relation between Person and Project. See the documentation on
    reverse mapping tool options here:
    http://www.solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/latest/docs/ref_guide_pc_reverse.html
    But your real problem is that you are creating new objects, assigning
    primary key values, and expecting them to represent existing objects.
    That's not the way JDO works. If you want to set relations to existing
    objects in JDO, you use the PM to look up those objects. If you try to
    create new objects, JDO will assume you want to insert new records into
    the DB, and you'll get PK conflicts like you see here.
    There are several good books out on JDO; if you're just starting out with
    it, they might save you a lot of time and help you master JDO quickly.

  • How to insert record in child table with foreign key

    Hi,
    I am using Jdeveloper 11.1.2.0. I have two master table one child table.
    How to insert and update a record in child table with foreign key ?
    I have created VO based on three EO(one eo is updatable other two eo are references) by using joined query.
    Thanks in Advance
    Edited by: 890233 on Dec 24, 2011 10:40 PM

    ... And here is the example to insert using sequenceimpl by getting the primary key of the master record and insert master and detail together.
    Re: Unable to insert a new row with a sequence generated column id
    -Arun

  • How to save a record with null foreign key?

    Dear all,
    Most articles show non-nullable foreign keys; but now I've got a problem with nullable foreign keys.
    With this simple example: an employee has zero or one manager.
    in manager object:
    @OneToMany(cascade={CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.REFRESH}, mappedBy="manager")
    private Collection<Employee> employees;
    in employee object:
    @ManyToOne
    @JoinColumn(name="manager_id")
    private Manager manager;
    when updating an employee record, i may use a selectOneMenu to pass a manager id of "0", I expect toplink to save a null manager_id in the employee record; but i tries to create a new manager object of id="0" (i.e. insert a new manager record instead)
    the code i use to save an employee is like this:
    em.getTransaction().begin();
    em.merge(employee);
    em.getTransaction().commit();
    What's the correct way to save the employee record with a null manager_id column?
    Could someone help?
    Thanks a lot!
    AK

    But could you give me some pointers on how could I do
    that from the web UI level?Got it. You want to select "nothing" and then set the object reference to that. I can't help you on JSF but how do you lookup the selected object behind the scenes? If you use entityManager.(Employee.class, 0) then you should get back null if there is no Employee with id=0.
    --Shaun                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Foreign key validation while creating master/detail record in document mode

    I am creating master/detail records in the document mode. And I am generating the master primary key in the create() method of the master Entity Object. Now I valdate the foreign key in the detail Entity Object's validateEntity() method by doing a query to the master table through some View Object.
    But since the master record has not yet been posted (since it hasn't been committed) to the database, this query does not return any record and the validation fails in detail object.
    And thus the create fails.
    Please let me know if this is the right approach for doing this. If so where I am going wrong? Else please let me know if there are any better approach to do this.
    Kunal

    Kunal:
    Use a code snippet like the following:
    --- Assuming you're in the detail EO's create method ---
    oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl eDef = oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.findDefObject(<package-qualified-name-of-the-master-Entity-Object>);
    oracle.jbo.Row masterRow = eDef.findByPrimaryKey(this.getDBTransaction(), <foreign-key>);
    If the row does not exist, masterRow will be null.
    findByPrimaryKey first checks the entity cache (which will include your new master row(s)) and then go out to database (if it's not in cache).
    Thanks.
    Sung

  • Create foreign keys to delete child records

    I am unfamiliar with foreign keys, I have 3 tables one is the parent table if a record is deleted in the parent table I would like the record to be deleted from the child record but I think that I am also confused about which should be the parent table
    (purpose is to use in a form)
    parent table (i think)
    AdminEntry table
    entryid ,
    date1,
    date1desc,
    date2,
    date2desc,
    date3,
    date3desc
    In a form each date and its description is placed in the following table
    CalendarEntry table
    calendarid,
    date,
    datedesc
    entryid (fk)?
    so CalendarEntry will have many entries at least 3 from one entryId, this I get but what if I want to delete lets say date2 and date2desc record. If I delete it from AdminEntry table how will calendarEntry table know which one to delete?
    Please help very confused.
    (the other table also inserts to the CalendarEntry table)

    There is a demo of this functionality in Morgan's Library at www.psoug.org under Foreign Keys.
    Look for ON DELETE CASCADE.

  • How to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys?

    I have a table with a FK and I want to update a row in that table without being blocked by another transaction which is updating the parent row at the same time. Here is an example:
    CREATE TABLE dbo.ParentTable
    PARENT_ID int NOT NULL,
    VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT PK_ParentTable PRIMARY KEY (PARENT_ID)
    GO
    CREATE TABLE dbo.ChildTable
    CHILD_ID int NOT NULL,
    PARENT_ID INT NULL,
    VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT PK_ChildTable PRIMARY KEY (CHILD_ID),
    CONSTRAINT FK_ChildTable__ParentTable FOREIGN KEY (PARENT_ID)
    REFERENCES dbo.ParentTable (PARENT_ID)
    GO
    INSERT INTO ParentTable(PARENT_ID, VALUE)
    VALUES (1, 'Some value');
    INSERT INTO ChildTable(CHILD_ID, PARENT_ID, VALUE)
    VALUES (1, 1, 'Some value');
    GO
    Now I have 2 transactions running at the same time:
    The first transaction:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ParentTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    The second transaction:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ChildTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test',
    PARENT_ID = 1
    WHERE CHILD_ID = 1;
    If 'UPDATE ParentTable' statement runs a bit earlier, then 'UPDATE ChildTable' statement is blocked untill the first transaction is committed or rollbacked. It happens because SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys, even
    if the transaction is using read uncommitted, read committed snapshot (read committed using row versioning) or snapshot isolation level. I cannot see why change in the ParentTable.VALUE should prevent me from updating ChildTable. Please note that ParentTable.PARENT_ID
    is not changed by the first transaction, which means that from FK's point of view whatevere is set to the ParentTable.VALUE is never a problem for referential integrity. So, such blocking behavior seems to me not logical. Furthermore, it contradicts to the
    MSDN:
    Transactions running at the READ UNCOMMITTED level do not issue shared locks to prevent other transactions from modifying data read by the current transaction. READ UNCOMMITTED transactions are also not blocked by exclusive locks that would prevent the
    current transaction from reading rows that have been modified but not committed by other transactions. 
    Does anybody know how to workaround the issue? In other words, are there any tricks to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys? (Disabling FK is not an option.) Thank you.
    Alexey

    If you change the primary key of the parent table to be nonclustered, there is no blocking.
    Indeed, when I update ParentTable.VALUE, then:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, a particular row in the clustered index is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: KEY)
    in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, a particular physical row in the heap is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: RID).
    and when I update ChildTable.PARENT_ID, then:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, this index is used to verify referential integrity:
    in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, again this index is used to verify referential integrity, but this time it is not locked:
    It is important to note that in both cases SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys. The principal difference is that in case of clustered PK_ParentTable the request is blocked, while for non-clustered index it is granted.
    Thank you, Erland for the idea and explanations.
    The only thing that upsets me is that this solution cannot be applied, because I don't want to convert PK_ParentTable from clustered to non-clustered just to avoid blocking issues. It is a pity that SQL Server is not smart enough to realize that:
    ParentTable.PARENT_ID is not changed and, as a result, should not be locked
    ChildTable.PARENT_ID is not actually changed either (old value in my example is 1 and the new value is also 1) and, as a result, there is no need at all for validating the foreign key.
    In fact, the problem I described is just a tip of the iceberg. The real challenge is that I have deadlocks because of the FK validation. In reality, the first transaction has an additional statement which updates ChildTable:
    SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;
    BEGIN TRAN
    UPDATE ParentTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    UPDATE ChildTable
    SET VALUE = 'Test'
    WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
    The result is famous message:
    Msg 1205, Level 13, State 51, Line xx
    Transaction (Process ID xx) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
    I know that if I change the order of the two statements, it will solve the deadlock issue. But let's imagine I cannot do it. What are the other options?
    Alexey

  • How oracle locks child table with foreign keys?

    I have 3 tables. tab1 , tab2,tab3.
    tab2 has FK on tab1.
    tab3 has FK on tab2.All the FKs are indexed.
    One transaction in my code changes tab3.
    One transaction in my code changes tab1,tab2 and tab3.
    I am facing deadlock issues on tab3 when both transactions work concurrently.
    If I lock tab1 with "for update nowait " at the start of both transaction,will the problem be solved?

    Let me elaborate on my problem
    TAB1          
    =====          
    a1 b1 c1     
    a2 b2 c2     
    a3 b3 c3     
    TAB2               
    =====               
    x1 y1 z1 a1          
    x2 y2 z2 a2          
    x3 y3 z3 a3          
    (FK indexed)          
    TAB3
    =====
    p1 q1 r1 y1
    p2 q2 r2 y2
    p3 q3 r3 y3
    (FK indexed)
    Transaction 1 for session1
    select * from TAB1 where col1 = a1 for update nowait;
    doing activities on tab2 and tab3 depending on the foreign key joins in loop.
    Transaction 2 for session 2
    select * from TAB1 where col1 = a2 for update nowait;
    doing activities on tab2 and tab3 depending on the foreign key joins in loop.
    1) Please let me know whether these sessions can head towards deadlock.
    2) If some session try to update TAB3 row of y1 when session 1 is still working , how will system behave?
    will it go for blocked session or go for dead lock or get an exception message?
    Edited by: user9974355 on Dec 17, 2008 11:58 PM
    Edited by: user9974355 on Dec 18, 2008 12:00 AM

  • FOREIGN KEY Constraint And Table Lock

    According to Db Concepts on Data Integrity->Types of Integrity Contraints->Referential Integrity Constraints, if the FK column is not indexed, delete/update of parent table would cause child table share locked.
    I can understand the reason behind this behaviour because if parent's PK is modified but not commited yet, we don't want another transaction to insert/update the child's FK column to use the deleted parent PK value and this requires a table share lock.
    The problem is, I don't understand why if the child's FK is indexed, no table share lock is acquired. The same condition could happen and we still need to prevent another transaction from using the uncommitted deleted PK in parent as the child's FK.
    Appreciate and advice.

    hi
    When PK column change, Oracle is going to have to do a
    referential integrity check on any referenced columns ,in
    the absence of an index on the child end of the foreign
    key, that would seem to result in a full table scan of the table which cause locks the entire table for any
    Delete or Update on Parent table.
    Khurram

  • Problem with Foreign Key relationships in SAP R/3 4.7

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to create a foreign key relationship between 2 transparent tables in SAP R/3 4.7
    Table 1:ZAAVNDR (MANDT (pk), VENDORNO (pk), NAME, REGION, COUNTRY (fk)) Foreign Key Table
    Table 2: ZAAVNDRREF(MANDT(pk), COUNTRY (pk)) ---Check table
    I have added few valid countries in check table but when I am adding some records in foreign key table with invalid countries these records are not being restricted and are still successfully going into the table.
    Could any one please help in this.
    Thanks in anticipation.
    -Amit

    Hi Sandra,
    Many thanks for your response and providing time of yours.
    Now, I have done exactly the same thing, but still it is the same.
    I have created two new tables as below:
    ZAAVREF (Check table)
    MANDT (PK)
    COUNTRY (PK) Domain:ZAACOUNT (CHAR 10)
    ZAAV1 (Foreign key table)
    MANDT (PK)
    COUNTRY (PK) Domain:ZAACOUNT (CHAR 10)
    Then I have created FK on country of foreign key table ZAAV1 and then SE16 (for table ZAAVREF)->Create Entries-> Entered values for Country only->Save....Records entered with valid Country values.
    After that SE16 (for table ZAAV1)->Create Entries-->Entered an Invalid country->Save->Still the record entered to the Database successfully....
    Could you please let me know where I am going wrong.
    I am using SAP R/3 4.7 and creating tables using Tools->ABAP Workbench->Development->ABAP dictionary

  • Can not insert null into foreign key issue

    Hi ,
    I am having parent-child relationship table.
    In the child table when I am adding a new record , data is getting inserted with foreign key.
    After insert if I immediately update the same record. Its giving error that can not insert null into foreign key.
    If i click on rollback button I am able to update that record properly.

    Hi ,
    I am having parent-child relationship table.
    In the child table when I am adding a new record , data is getting inserted with foreign key.
    After insert if I immediately update the same record. Its giving error that can not insert null into foreign key.
    If i click on rollback button I am able to update that record properly.

  • Binding for table produces list for other tables using foreign key and crea

    Using
    software Jdev 11G, WLS 11G, Oracle DB 11G, Windows Vista platform
    technology EJB 3.0, jspx, backing beans, session bean
    I cannot create a namedquery on my secondary table. The method for the column uses the entity object rather than the name and value of the column.
    For instance,
    (Coketruck) table has inventory records(Products) table
    Coketruck has one to many to the Products table
    Products has a many to one to the Coketruck
    I need to return the products from the product table based on the CokeTruck but I cannot create a namedQuery because the method in the Product table is an entity object type instead of a long that I can use to look up all the products based off the column truck_id.
    This is what I was expecting…
    Private Long truckId;
    public Long getTruckId() {
    return truckId;
    public void setTruckId (Long truckId) {
    this. truckId = truckId;
    Instead this is what I have…
    @ManyToOne
    @JoinColumn(name = "TRUCK_ID")
    private Coketruck coketruck;
    this. coketruck = coketruck
    public Coketruck getCoketruck() {
    return coketruck;
    public void set Coketruck (Coketruck coketruck) {
    this. coketruck = coketruck;
    How do I do a query on the Product table to return all the products that are in the coketruck?
    If I do the following it expects for me to pass the Entity Object which I cannot use as search criteria for my find method.
    @NamedQuery(name = "Products.findById", query = "select o from Products o where o.truckId = :truckId")
    On a different note but the same song…
    I noticed that when I look at my Session Bean Data Contols that the coketruck already has a list of the products. I have created a jsp page with a backing bean and have been able to use the namedquery on the coketruck entity to retrieve the productList. Unfortunately I need to sort the products by type and was also not able to find where to perform the work to be able to iterate through the productList to get my desired display. Therefore I started looking at doing another namedquery that would only retrieve the product_type ordering by the truckId.
    Seems I have come full circle… I don’t care what method I have to use to get the info back.
    Any help is greatly appreciated!

    user9005175 wrote:
    Hi!
    I work on an application wich uses a shopping cart stored in a database. The shopping cart uses two tables:
    CART: Holds information common for one shopping cart: the user it is connected to etc.
    - Primary key: CART_ID
    CART_ROW: One row in the cart, e.g. one new product to buy.
    - Primary key: ROW_ID
    - Foreign key: CART_ROW.CART_ID references CART.CART_ID
    From the code the rows in the cart are collected per cart, as is modelled by the foreign key. There exists one more relationship, which we use in the code, but which is not modelled by a foreign key in the database. One row can be dependent on another row, which makes the other row a parent.
    CART_ROW has a column PARENT_ID which references CART_ROW.ROW_ID.
    Should we add a foreign key for PARENT_ID? Or are there any questions to consider when it is a foreign key to the same table?
    I suggest to add foreign key it wont harm the performance (except while on insert when there would be validation for the foreign key). But it would prevent users to insert wrong/corrupt data either through code or directly by loggin in the database.
    A while ago we added indexes, both on ROW_ID and on PARENT_ID. Could the index on PARENT_ID have been harmful, since there is no foreign key?
    Index on parent_id would only be harmful if you do not make use of index after creating it (i.e. there is no query which make use of this index).
    And if you decide to have a foreign key on parent_id then I suggest to have index too on parent_id as it would be helpful atleast when you delete any record in this table.
    Best regards!

  • Performance degradation when using foreign keys

    Hi,
    I face drastic performance degradation when I add foreign keys to a table and perform insert / update on that table.
    I have a row store table to  which I need to insert around 1,50,000 records.
    If the table has no foreign key reference it takes maximum of 5 seconds but if the same table has references to other tables (in my case there are 3 references), the processing speed reduces drastically to 2 minutes.
    Is there any solution / best practice that can help me in gaining performance (processing speed) in this situation?
    Thanks
    S.Srivatsan

    Hi Sri,
    When you perform one insert in any database table which is having foreign key relationships, it will check the corresponding parent tables to check whether the master data is available or not. If your table is having 2 foreign key relationship, it happen twice per insert. Hence the performance will degrade. This is one of the reasons why ECC  doesn't establish foreign key relationship in the back end database. The case is not just for INSERT, for UPDATE & DELETE the same is applicable.
    Sreehari

  • How to customize the foreign key constraint exception

    Hi All,
    I have two table, A and B.
    B.ref is foreign key references to A.id in database.
    Now I want to delete a row of table A in screen, error messages are :
    "Constraint "xxx.xxxx_S_FK1" is violated during post operation "Delete" using SQL statement "DELETE FROM xxxxxx WHERE xxxxxxxxx" and "ORA-02292: integrity constraint (xxx.xxxx_S_FK1) violated - child record found"
    How do I customize this error message? Is it possible to do it in EO Validation?
    Thank you!

    You can override the DoDML() method in EntityImpl something like follows
    @Override
    protected void doDML(int i, TransactionEvent transactionEvent) {
    try
    super.doDML(i, transactionEvent);
    catch(DMLConstraintException _ex) {
    if(_ex.getErrorCode().equals("26048") ) {
    // handle your exception
    sid

  • Questions about creating a foreign key on a large table

    Hello @ll,
    during a database update I lost a foreign key between two tables. The tables are called werteart and werteartarchiv_pt. Because of its size, werteartarchiv_pt is a partitioned table. The missing foreign key was a constraint on table werteartarchiv_pt referencing werteart.
    Some statistics about the sizes of the mentioned tables:
    werteart 22 MB
    werteartarchiv_pt 223 GB
    werteartarchiv_pt (Index) 243 GB
    I tried to create the foreign key again, but it failed with the following error (Excuses for the german error message):
    sqlplus ORA-00604: Fehler auf rekursiver SQL-Ebene 1
    sqlplus ORA-01652: Temp-Segment kann nicht um 128 in Tablespace TEMPS00 erweitert
    The statement I used:
    alter table werteartarchiv_pt
    add constraint werteartarchiv_pt_fk1
    foreign key (schiene, werteartadresse, merkmale)
    references werteart (schiene, werteartadresse, merkmale)
    on delete cascade
    initially deferred deferrable;
    So the problem seems to be, that Oracle needs a lot of temporary tablespace to generate the foreign key and I do not know how much and why.
    My questions now are, and hopefully someone is here, who can answer all or a part of it:
    1) Why does Oracle need temporary tablespace to create the foreign key? The foreign key uses the same columns like the primary key.
    2a) Is it possible to tweak the statement without using the temporary tablespace?
    2b) If it is not possible to avoid the usage of the temporary tablespace, is there a formula how to calculate the needed temporary tablespace?
    3) Is it possible to modify data in the tables while the foreign key is created or is the whole table locked during the process?
    Any help or hint is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Bjoern

    RollinHand wrote:
    My questions now are, and hopefully someone is here, who can answer all or a part of it:
    1) Why does Oracle need temporary tablespace to create the foreign key? The foreign key uses the same columns like the primary key.Because it's validating the data to ensure the foreign key won't be violated. If you had specified ENABLE NOVALIDATE when creating it then the existing data in the table wouldn't need to be checked and the statement should complete instantly (future data added would be checked by the constraint).
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm
    Search for "Enable Novalidate Constraint State"

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I prevent sites from opening private windows?

    Many websites, such as Moodle (classroom tool) and YouTube try to open certain new content, especially Google-hosted content, in private windows. In may cases, such as YouTube comment panes, there is now way to avoid this, and even if there is I forg

  • Importing in 3.1 - I can't do two SD cards in a row without restarting?

    I have just upgraded to Ap 3.1. I used to import multiple SD cards in succession after a trip away, and it seemed fairly simple: 1. Insert card 1 to iMac card reader 2. import images 3. use aperture to delete files from the card, and then move on to

  • Can't download OS X 10.8 from app store

    Hi,     I tried to upgrade my mac os x 10.6.8 to 10.8.2 using mac app store just now, however when I click the "buy app" button, it started loading and the "colour wheel" icon kept on turning for over 15mins and didn't work, I tried a few times and g

  • Storing files at ftp server

    smbd know how to store files at ftp server from javafx code ?

  • "unable to acquire rendered frame" error message with AE CS6 Motion Tracker

    Hi Everyone, I am having issues with the built in tracking software in After Effects CS6. Everytime I hit "analyze" I receive the error message "unable to acquire rendered frame" or it simply remains at "0% (frame 1 of 70)". Sometimes I get the messa