Forte Bug 22023 .
Ivor Vaz@SUNLIFE
08-11-97 12:57 PM
Hello,
Does anybody know of a work-around for using MS-SQL stored procedures with
complex select statements to build cursors in forte ?
I have to use a select statement that contains a union. When I do an
OpenCursor Forte returns an exception error. This is a know limitation
with Forte, ODBC and MS-SQL. It is listed as bug number 22023.
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions.
Thank You
Ivor Vaz
The problem was solved by defining the method as inline and implementing it in the header file. I am now even more sure that this is a bug in the Forte C++ 6.0U1, but I have to check the patch levels of my development environment before I'll report it as such to Forte development team.
Of course any other comments are still wellcome :-).
Similar Messages
-
Re: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back
We have created a business process manager (BPM) layer between our client GUI
and business model objects that supports Java call-in/call-out. This enables
switching out the Forte windows with Java windows for a web solution with
minimal code re-write.
We were able to get most functionality to work as per our design, which
included registering a call back function from a Java GUI in the BPM, but had
to make some sacrifices due to a Forte bug, at least under 3.0.D. We turned
in case #38434, detailing errors when we tried to fire a callback method with
parameters, example below ("callback" was the Java object passed in.)
method TestIIOPBackend.FireCallback(input message: Framework.string)
begin
if callback != nil then
task.part.logmgr.putline('Firing callback');
//WORKS
callback.CallMe();
//ERROR!
callback.CallMeString(message);
else
task.part.logmgr.putline('Callback not set');
end if;
end method;
This may have been fixed in 3.0.F, we found a way to work around it in our
design and haven't investigated since.
-DFR
Ngai* Stuart <[email protected]> on 01/20/98 09:14:28 AM
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back
Has anyone actually tried the tech note 11153 "Java call-in/call-out and
Forte
Anchored Objects"? I'm trying to verify the callback mechanism from
Forte to
an IIOP Java client. Thanks.
<<< Stuart Ngai (416)359-4306 [email protected] >>>
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from pebble.SageIT.com by notes.bsginc.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Jan20.101336.1771.787915; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:13:36 -0600
Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.SageIT.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id HAA03868
for forte-users-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:25:41 -0800
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.SageIT.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id HAA03862
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:25:39 -0800
Received: from keeper.nesbittburns.ca(192.139.71.50) by pebble.sagesoln.com via
smap (V2.0)
id xma003860; Tue, 20 Jan 98 07:25:19 -0800
Received: from NesbittBurns.ca (tds223.nesbittburns.ca) by
keeper.NesbittBurns.ca (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA22591; Tue, 20 Jan 98 10:23:47 EST
Received: from nbtormail02.nesbittburns.ca by NesbittBurns.ca (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA12961; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:26:54 -0500
Received: by nbtormail02.nesbittburns.ca with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server
Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52)
id <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998
10:27:52
-0500
Message-Id:
<c=CA%a=_%p=Nesbitt_Burns_In%[email protected]>
From: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:27:39 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>Peggy,
1) Do you have experience with PowerBuilder and Forte' applications running at
the same time on the same (laptop) computer? Here I'm thinking
about any potential resource constraints? Memory Requirements?As log as you are using Win95 or NT you should not be concerned about WIN-resources. Memory depends more on what your 2 tier PB application requires than what your Forté would require.
Cheers,
Troels
Lindhard Forté Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: Peggy Lynn Adrian [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 1998 10:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Forte and Powerbuilder Experience Needed
I sent this query to Forte support but maybe someone out there can help me
with practical experience
with the following?
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Lynn Adrian/AM/LLY on 01/15/98 04:30
PM ---------------------------
Peggy Lynn Adrian
01/14/98 03:55 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Peggy Lynn Adrian/AM/LLY@Lilly
Subject: Forte and Powerbuilder Experience Needed
1) Do you have experience with PowerBuilder and Forte' applications running at
the same time on the same (laptop) computer? Here I'm thinking
about any potential resource constraints? Memory Requirements?
2) Can PowerBuilder and Forte' applications call and interact with one
another?
The Forte' application will need to interact with the PowerBuilder application
to pull out information maintained by the PB application. -
RE: (forte-users) Conductor Distributed AccessException
Man! you need some Gas. Top it up and give it a go :)
-----Original Message-----
From: mmynatt [mailto:mmynattcomponentsartistry.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 March 2000 10:19 am
To: Forte-Users-Digest
Subject: (forte-users) Conductor Distributed Access Exception
Hi,
Has anyone ever seen this error message in the conductor trace window on
starting an engine:
Channel.Open() Distributed Access exception on initiator channel "Ping" from
initiator component dbserv1(db unit) to component DB router primary caused
the channel to be disconnected.
The engine will not start.
Mark Mynatt
Components Artistry, Inc.
303-688-0784
mmynattcomponentsartistry.com <mailto:mmynattcomponentsartistry.com>Hi Jagadish,
I'm not trying to change it, it's at "Allowed" on all of my superclasses,
and I want it to be "Allowed" on the subclass too. If I remember correctly
there's some blurb in the manual somewhere that objects are smaller and/or
quicker if you turn of the subclass override thing?
Anyway, apparently, according to other replies I've received, it's just a
forte bug, and I need to recreate the service object. I'll give it a go
when I get in to work tomorrow and come back to you all if it still doesn't
work...
Thanks everyone,
Tim Sawyer
Development Consultant
PanCredit
Leeds, UK.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: Tim Sawyer
Cc: '[email protected]'
Sent: 17/04/01 18:39
Subject: Re: (forte-users) Distributed Property
You have the answer. A class should set "Subclass Override" to TRUE (or
ON)
if it wants any of its derived classes to override the behaviour.
If you want your subclass to be able set its Runtime properties
(Distributed, Shared, Transactional, Monitored), then turn ON "Subclass
override" in all the classes above in the hierarchy.
Jagadish
This e-mail and its attachments are for the use of the addressee only.
It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure. It is not a contract, and prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy.
Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily
reflect those of PanCredit Systems Limited. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this e-mail
or attachments to anyone other than the addressee.
If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone
at once.
PanCredit Systems Limited
Tel: +44 113 250 0260
Fax: +44 113 250 0621 -
Re: (forte-users) FW: (forte-users) Overflow Exception thatIcan't catch
Dave
If you use #,##0.00 template, forte won't allow you to enter more than 28 numbers.
Nat
"Campbell, Dave" <DCampbellpurolator.com> 01/28 10:49 AM >>>Thanks Zenon,
You mean... that without the aftervaluechange event, I could catch this?
Because by no means is my exception block anchored to that event.
I am looking for advice of where I could put this exception block...if there
is another possible place at all.
Thanks.
Dave
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
-----Original Message-----
Hi Dave,
You have no chance to catch this exception in aftervaluechange block.
This event is triggered if the value in DataField is OK.
You get only Arithmetic exception without the aftervaluechange event if the
length of the decimal is greater as 28.
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Forte Developer
Purolator Courier Ltd.
ZAdamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Dave [SMTP:DCampbellpurolator.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 8:19 AM
To: 'kamranaminyahoo.com'
Subject: (forte-users) Overflow Exception that I can't
catch...
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the properties sheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over 28 characters into the
field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7, TASKiD =
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492] in
application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes when I leave the field
and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount can not exceed
100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and the "Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all exceptions and posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may catch this
Exception???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.comDave
If you use #,##0.00 template, forte won't allow you to enter more than 28 numbers.
Nat
"Campbell, Dave" <DCampbellpurolator.com> 01/28 10:49 AM >>>Thanks Zenon,
You mean... that without the aftervaluechange event, I could catch this?
Because by no means is my exception block anchored to that event.
I am looking for advice of where I could put this exception block...if there
is another possible place at all.
Thanks.
Dave
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
-----Original Message-----
Hi Dave,
You have no chance to catch this exception in aftervaluechange block.
This event is triggered if the value in DataField is OK.
You get only Arithmetic exception without the aftervaluechange event if the
length of the decimal is greater as 28.
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Forte Developer
Purolator Courier Ltd.
ZAdamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Dave [SMTP:DCampbellpurolator.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 8:19 AM
To: 'kamranaminyahoo.com'
Subject: (forte-users) Overflow Exception that I can't
catch...
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the properties sheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over 28 characters into the
field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7, TASKiD =
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492] in
application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes when I leave the field
and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount can not exceed
100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and the "Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all exceptions and posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may catch this
Exception???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com -
RE: (forte-users) FW: (forte-users) Overflow Exception thatI can't catc
Nat,
As I feared, This forces the user to enter decimals even if there are none.
The Users Don't want this.
So, i'm afraid i am back at beginning.. Trying to catch this exception..
Thank you for your input.
I would be happy to try anyone elses solution to this annoying issue.
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
Dave
If you use #,##0.00 template, forte won't allow you to enter more than
28 numbers.
Nat
"Campbell, Dave" <DCampbellpurolator.com> 01/28 10:49 AM >>>Thanks Zenon,
You mean... that without the aftervaluechange event, I could catch this?
Because by no means is my exception block anchored to that event.
I am looking for advice of where I could put this exception block...if there
is another possible place at all.
Thanks.
Dave
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
-----Original Message-----
Hi Dave,
You have no chance to catch this exception in aftervaluechange block.
This event is triggered if the value in DataField is OK.
You get only Arithmetic exception without the aftervaluechange event if the
length of the decimal is greater as 28.
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Forte Developer
Purolator Courier Ltd.
ZAdamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Dave [SMTP:DCampbellpurolator.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 8:19 AM
To: 'kamranaminyahoo.com'
Subject: (forte-users) Overflow Exception that I can't
catch...
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the properties sheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over 28 characters into the
field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7, TASKiD =
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492] in
application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes when I leave the field
and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount can not exceed
100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and the "Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all exceptions and posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may catch this
Exception???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.comNat,
As I feared, This forces the user to enter decimals even if there are none.
The Users Don't want this.
So, i'm afraid i am back at beginning.. Trying to catch this exception..
Thank you for your input.
I would be happy to try anyone elses solution to this annoying issue.
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
Dave
If you use #,##0.00 template, forte won't allow you to enter more than
28 numbers.
Nat
"Campbell, Dave" <DCampbellpurolator.com> 01/28 10:49 AM >>>Thanks Zenon,
You mean... that without the aftervaluechange event, I could catch this?
Because by no means is my exception block anchored to that event.
I am looking for advice of where I could put this exception block...if there
is another possible place at all.
Thanks.
Dave
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
-----Original Message-----
Hi Dave,
You have no chance to catch this exception in aftervaluechange block.
This event is triggered if the value in DataField is OK.
You get only Arithmetic exception without the aftervaluechange event if the
length of the decimal is greater as 28.
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Forte Developer
Purolator Courier Ltd.
ZAdamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Dave [SMTP:DCampbellpurolator.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 8:19 AM
To: 'kamranaminyahoo.com'
Subject: (forte-users) Overflow Exception that I can't
catch...
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the properties sheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over 28 characters into the
field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7, TASKiD =
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492] in
application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes when I leave the field
and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount can not exceed
100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and the "Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all exceptions and posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may catch this
Exception???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.com -
Re: (forte-users) Distributed Property
You have the answer. A class should set "Subclass Override" to TRUE (or ON)
if it wants any of its derived classes to override the behaviour.
If you want your subclass to be able set its Runtime properties
(Distributed, Shared, Transactional, Monitored), then turn ON "Subclass
override" in all the classes above in the hierarchy.
Jagadish
Tim Sawyer
<Tim.Sawyer@panc To: "'[email protected]'"
redit.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
04/17/2001 12:37 Fax to:
Subject: (forte-users) Distributed Property
Hello.
I've just created a service object, based on a new subclass. The new
subclass has distributed property set to allowed, and the other three set
to
disallowed. These are set about four layers further up the inheritance
hierarchy, and have subclass override turned off.
When I try and run my app, I get the following error:
USER ERROR: The class apiAbstractClasses.PanAPIReplicate used as the type
of
service object apiAbstractClasses.PanAPIReplicateSO has the 'Distributed'
property set to 'DISALLOWED', so it cannot be used as the type of a
service
object.
Class: qqsp_UsageException
Error #: [1602, 358]
Detected at: qqcf_GlobalDefinition::ProxyClass at 1
Last TOOL statement: method partws.HandleRunCmd
Error Time: Tue Apr 17 17:33:34
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_cl0_Client",
(partitionId
= 2DC37DB0-BD7A-11D4-A08F-220DA12BAA77:0x1ad3:0xb, taskId =
[2DC37DB0-BD7A-11D4-A08F-220DA12BAA77:0x1ad3:0xb.392]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 318 on node TORGOS in environment 43DENV.
So I have distributed set to Allowed and the error says "Oh know you don't"
in true panto style.
Anyone like to suggest a direction I start looking in to fix this?
Cheers,
Tim Sawyer
Development Consultant
PanCredit
Leeds, UK.
This e-mail and its attachments are for the use of the addressee only.
It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure. It is not a contract, and prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy.
Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily
reflect those of PanCredit Systems Limited. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this e-mail
or attachments to anyone other than the addressee.
If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone
at once.
PanCredit Systems Limited
Tel: +44 113 250 0260
Fax: +44 113 250 0621
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]Hi Jagadish,
I'm not trying to change it, it's at "Allowed" on all of my superclasses,
and I want it to be "Allowed" on the subclass too. If I remember correctly
there's some blurb in the manual somewhere that objects are smaller and/or
quicker if you turn of the subclass override thing?
Anyway, apparently, according to other replies I've received, it's just a
forte bug, and I need to recreate the service object. I'll give it a go
when I get in to work tomorrow and come back to you all if it still doesn't
work...
Thanks everyone,
Tim Sawyer
Development Consultant
PanCredit
Leeds, UK.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: Tim Sawyer
Cc: '[email protected]'
Sent: 17/04/01 18:39
Subject: Re: (forte-users) Distributed Property
You have the answer. A class should set "Subclass Override" to TRUE (or
ON)
if it wants any of its derived classes to override the behaviour.
If you want your subclass to be able set its Runtime properties
(Distributed, Shared, Transactional, Monitored), then turn ON "Subclass
override" in all the classes above in the hierarchy.
Jagadish
This e-mail and its attachments are for the use of the addressee only.
It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure. It is not a contract, and prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy.
Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily
reflect those of PanCredit Systems Limited. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this e-mail
or attachments to anyone other than the addressee.
If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone
at once.
PanCredit Systems Limited
Tel: +44 113 250 0260
Fax: +44 113 250 0621 -
Just to preface ... it's kind of difficult to describe this as a Forte
bug, but after the install, it was noticed that the system's global path
was modified. Specifically
"c:\forte\install\bin;c:\forte\objectivity\bin" was appended. One would
think that would be fine, but what was observed, is that when launching
a command shell (cmd.exe), system variables used to set the path were
not being expanded. Again, specifically, the
"%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;" was not being expanded to
"c:\winnt\system32;c:\winnt;". As you can guess, there were a few
programs that weren't being found. Now one peculiar oberservation
however ... using "Run ..." under the Start menu did seem to be able to
interpret the path correctly. It was only a probem when you launched a
instance of "cmd.exe". (Makes me wonder if there isn't a problem with
the command shell.) Anyway, the fix seems to be pretty simple. It
appears that the path variable needs to be terminated with a trailing
";". After adding that things seemed to be expanding properly.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>Greg,
what you just found is Forte Bug 31605. (I wonder when they are goinig
to actually fix it.) The Workaround is quite easy. Just go into Control
Panel - System - Environment. You don't have to change anything. Just
click into PATH definition and save it again. The next time you open a
cmd.exe it will again resolve PATH correctly.
Uli
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Gorham [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 5:07 PM
To: forte-users
Subject: install bug?
Just to preface ... it's kind of difficult to describe this as a Forte
bug, but after the install, it was noticed that the system's global
path
was modified. Specifically
"c:\forte\install\bin;c:\forte\objectivity\bin" was appended. One
would
think that would be fine, but what was observed, is that when
launching
a command shell (cmd.exe), system variables used to set the path were
not being expanded. Again, specifically, the
"%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;" was not being expanded to
"c:\winnt\system32;c:\winnt;". As you can guess, there were a few
programs that weren't being found. Now one peculiar oberservation
however ... using "Run ..." under the Start menu did seem to be able
to
interpret the path correctly. It was only a probem when you launched
a
instance of "cmd.exe". (Makes me wonder if there isn't a problem with
the command shell.) Anyway, the fix seems to be pretty simple. It
appears that the path variable needs to be terminated with a trailing
";". After adding that things seemed to be expanding properly.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/> -
Hello.
I've just created a service object, based on a new subclass. The new
subclass has distributed property set to allowed, and the other three set to
disallowed. These are set about four layers further up the inheritance
hierarchy, and have subclass override turned off.
When I try and run my app, I get the following error:
USER ERROR: The class apiAbstractClasses.PanAPIReplicate used as the type of
service object apiAbstractClasses.PanAPIReplicateSO has the 'Distributed'
property set to 'DISALLOWED', so it cannot be used as the type of a
service
object.
Class: qqsp_UsageException
Error #: [1602, 358]
Detected at: qqcf_GlobalDefinition::ProxyClass at 1
Last TOOL statement: method partws.HandleRunCmd
Error Time: Tue Apr 17 17:33:34
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Forte_cl0_Client",
(partitionId
= 2DC37DB0-BD7A-11D4-A08F-220DA12BAA77:0x1ad3:0xb, taskId =
[2DC37DB0-BD7A-11D4-A08F-220DA12BAA77:0x1ad3:0xb.392]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 318 on node TORGOS in environment 43DENV.
So I have distributed set to Allowed and the error says "Oh know you don't"
in true panto style.
Anyone like to suggest a direction I start looking in to fix this?
Cheers,
Tim Sawyer
Development Consultant
PanCredit
Leeds, UK.
This e-mail and its attachments are for the use of the addressee only.
It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure. It is not a contract, and prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy.
Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily
reflect those of PanCredit Systems Limited. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this e-mail
or attachments to anyone other than the addressee.
If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone
at once.
PanCredit Systems Limited
Tel: +44 113 250 0260
Fax: +44 113 250 0621Hi Jagadish,
I'm not trying to change it, it's at "Allowed" on all of my superclasses,
and I want it to be "Allowed" on the subclass too. If I remember correctly
there's some blurb in the manual somewhere that objects are smaller and/or
quicker if you turn of the subclass override thing?
Anyway, apparently, according to other replies I've received, it's just a
forte bug, and I need to recreate the service object. I'll give it a go
when I get in to work tomorrow and come back to you all if it still doesn't
work...
Thanks everyone,
Tim Sawyer
Development Consultant
PanCredit
Leeds, UK.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: Tim Sawyer
Cc: '[email protected]'
Sent: 17/04/01 18:39
Subject: Re: (forte-users) Distributed Property
You have the answer. A class should set "Subclass Override" to TRUE (or
ON)
if it wants any of its derived classes to override the behaviour.
If you want your subclass to be able set its Runtime properties
(Distributed, Shared, Transactional, Monitored), then turn ON "Subclass
override" in all the classes above in the hierarchy.
Jagadish
This e-mail and its attachments are for the use of the addressee only.
It may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure. It is not a contract, and prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy.
Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily
reflect those of PanCredit Systems Limited. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute or disseminate this e-mail
or attachments to anyone other than the addressee.
If you receive this communication in error please advise us by telephone
at once.
PanCredit Systems Limited
Tel: +44 113 250 0260
Fax: +44 113 250 0621 -
To further clarify the problem I mention below, the specific error I get
with integer datatypes is "Driver Not Capable". Thanks.
Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 11:53:54 -0500
To: forte users
From: Tim Clotworthy <[email protected]>
Subject: ODBC/oracle problem
I have a problem related to accessing a personal oracle database with Forteservice objects via ODBC. The problem is that I cannot do inserts into
number fields with integers or integer nullables. The only thing I can get
to work are textdata types. Has anyone else had this problem? AM I using too
old a version of ODBC driver (Oracle71 version 1.11.0002)?
>
Thanks. Tim.This is a Forte bug I reported a few months ago. It is being tracked
under Forte call number 26402. Scheduled to be fixed in R3. There are
no work arounds that I am aware of.
Kalvin Inman
Andersen Windows
From: Tim Clotworthy[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 1997 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ODBC/oracle problem
To further clarify the problem I mention below, the specific error I get
with integer datatypes is "Driver Not Capable". Thanks.
Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 11:53:54 -0500
To: forte users
From: Tim Clotworthy <[email protected]>
Subject: ODBC/oracle problem
I have a problem related to accessing a personal oracle database with Forteservice objects via ODBC. The problem is that I cannot do inserts into
number fields with integers or integer nullables. The only thing I can get
to work are textdata types. Has anyone else had this problem? AM I using too
old a version of ODBC driver (Oracle71 version 1.11.0002)?
Thanks. Tim. -
Overflow Exception that I can't catch...
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the properties sheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over 28 characters into the field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7, TASKiD =
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8-23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492] in application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes when I leave the field and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount can not exceed 100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and the "Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all exceptions and posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may catch this Exception???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Dave Campbell
Consultant,
Caro Systems Inc.
Mailto:Dave.CampbellCaroSys.comHi Dave,
did you try this:
event loop
Begin
when ..... do
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
when ..... do
exception
when ex:ArithmeticException Do
End;
end loop;
As far as I remember it matters where you put Begin
inside an event loop. This way you will catch the
exception without dropping off the loop. If the value
is O.K. the aftervaluechanged event will be executed.
Hope that helps!
Rumen
Thanks Zenon,
You mean... that without the aftervaluechange event,
I could catch
this?
Because by no means is my exception block anchored to
that event.
I am looking for advice of where I could put this
exception block...if
there
is another possible place at all.
Thanks.
Dave-----Original Message-----
Hi Dave,
You have no chance to catch this exception in
aftervaluechange block.
This event is triggered if the value in DataField is
OK.
You get only Arithmetic exception without the
aftervaluechange event if
the
length of the decimal is greater as 28.
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Forte Developer-----Original Message-----
The problem is:
I have a DataField, mapped >type :DecimalNullable
the input mask is set to Template ( #,##0;;;;)
Because it is Template I can't validate on
keystroke and
I can't set the max characters in the >propertiessheet.
This works great until, Someone enters over >28characters into the
field.
It then displays the errors:
USER ERROR: Operation caused arithmetic >overflow
Class: qqsp_ArithmeticException
Error #: [301, 7]
Deteced at: DecimalData.SetScale at 1
ErrorTime: Thu Jan 27 15:50:48
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"PurolatorApplications_CL0_Client" ,(partitionId =
DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8->23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7,TASKiD = >
[DEB96B60-AA27-11D1-82A8->23E82A0FAA77:0X6f98:0x7.492]
in
application
"FTLaunch_c10",pid 279 on node W5300109 in
environment centrale
This is the first bit of code that executes >when Ileave the field
and the
value has changed:
when <est_daily_rev_amt>.aftervaluechange do
Begin
sys_upd_usr_nam = >aUserProfileBO.user_nam;
aCPVDetailItem.SetState(base_detailItem.CHANGED_STATE);
Exceptionwhen ex:ArithmeticException Do
Task.ErrMgr.Clear();
Window.MessageDialog(
messageText='Revenue amount >can not exceed
100,000,000',
MessageType=MT_WARNING);
Self.Window.PurgeEvents();
End;
This is what I do:
I put a debugging stop on the "when line" and >the"Exception line"
I also set the debugger to stop on all >exceptionsand posts.
It never reaches the above code!?
Is this a forte bug?
I need the template and I need it to be a
decimalnullable.
Is there any suggestions for where else I may >catchthis
Exception???
Thanks in advance__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com -
Hi to everybody,
I hope you can help me.
I was wondering if someone knows about bugs of Forte release F.
We had a client server application developed with Forte Express (client
Windows NT, server Sun Solaris) that starts at 08.00 a.m. every day.
At beginning clients connect to the server (cluster Sun) until circa
8.50 a.m. gradually, then at 9.10 a.m. they are more numerous until we
have almost 400 clients connected.
Usually between 9.00 and 9.30 a.m. the node manager crashes. I specify
that the memory setted with -fm flag is more than double of used memory
and there are no other different processes started on the server during
this period.
We don't think that it could be a problem due to the application
because, in this case, the partitions (compiled) should crash but, on
the contrary, they stay up.
Thanks anyway and happy new year,
Dr. Tesi Giovacchino
Fortè Developper
Telesoft S.p.A.Hi to everybody,
I hope you can help me.
I was wondering if someone knows about bugs of Forte release F.
We had a client server application developed with Forte Express (client
Windows NT, server Sun Solaris) that starts at 08.00 a.m. every day.
At beginning clients connect to the server (cluster Sun) until circa
8.50 a.m. gradually, then at 9.10 a.m. they are more numerous until we
have almost 400 clients connected.
Usually between 9.00 and 9.30 a.m. the node manager crashes. I specify
that the memory setted with -fm flag is more than double of used memory
and there are no other different processes started on the server during
this period.
We don't think that it could be a problem due to the application
because, in this case, the partitions (compiled) should crash but, on
the contrary, they stay up.
Thanks anyway and happy new year,
Dr. Tesi Giovacchino
Fortè Developper
Telesoft S.p.A. -
In the Forte 6U2 compiler, a function return can implicitly invoke a conversion constructor that is marked "explicit".
Consider:
class ABaseClass {};
template<class Type, class Uncert>
class Value
public:
Value(Type const& t, Uncert const& u) : _t(t), _u(u) {}
protected:
Type _t;
Uncert _u;
class Foo : public Value<float, double>, public ABaseClass
public:
explicit
Foo(ABaseClass b=ABaseClass(), float val=-1, double tol=0)
: ABaseClass(b), Value(val, tol)
std::cerr << "Explicit constructed Foo\n";
class Bar : public Value<int, double>, public ABaseClass
public:
explicit
Bar(ABaseClass b=ABaseClass(), int val=-1, double tol=0)
: ABaseClass(b), Value(val, tol)
std::cerr << "Explicit constructed Bar\n";
class Context
public:
Context() : _foo(ABaseClass(), 1.23, 0.45) {}
Bar getFoo() const
return _foo;
private:
Foo _foo;
int main()
Context c;
c.getFoo();
}Note that Context::getFoo has a type mismatch between the declared return type and the return value. This is a bug that was not caught by the compiler. Intstead, Bar(static_cast<ABaseClass>(_foo)) is invoked and
returned. The output of this run is:
Explicit constructed Foo (Context constructor)
Explicit constructed Bar (Context::getFoo return)
This behavior is non-standards conforming.-xO2 is enough to cause the failure.
Making the vulnerable pointer "static" fixes the problem, although this should make no difference.
My guess is over-eager register reuse, but I'm open to alternative theories. -
Mangling bug in Forte 6.1 Update 1 ?
Hi,
I built the following code
Foo.h >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
class Foo
public:
typedef Foo Bar;
void mangle( const Foo&, const Bar& );
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Foo.c >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
#include "Foo.h"
// Version 1
void Foo::mangle( const Foo&, const Foo::Bar& ) { }
// Version 2
// void Foo::mangle( const Foo&, const Foo& ) { }
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
The strange thing is the both version 1 and 2 of the implementation of the
method compile with "CC -C Foo.c", as I think is correct.
However they mangle to different symbols in the resulting .o file
Version 1 : __1cDFooGmangle6Mrk0r1_v_
Version 2 : __1cDFooGmangle6Mrk02_v_
Both these symbols demangle to : "void Foo::mangle(const Foo&,const Foo&)"
I a real world example this caused us some stange link time failures.
Am I right in thinking the both implementations are allowed and that
this a compiler bug?
David Hunter
Lehman BrothersHi,
I am not C++ guru, So I don't whether this is a bug or not.
But, in past somebody had given following workarounds
to me:
1. Use typedefs everywhere or nowhere.
2. Use Pragma weak, specifying the mangled names as quoted strings.
3. Use "-Qoption ccfe -abiopt=mangle6" . Note, however, that this option may prevent linking with some libraries.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Kalpesh -
Crazy preverifier bug using forte
I boot my Windows 98SE machine and execute my test Midlet from forte with total success, however the second time I try to execute it I receive a "Cannot start preverifier" error. If I reboot my machine it works again, but only the one time. It is almost like the preverfier app is not closing itself down when it has verified the class first time. Can anyone help remedy this problem?
Any help very much appreciated
MatIn order to get it work, I have to press F6 a few times. I believe that it's something to do with forte not waiting for the compiler to finish before running the verifier.
-
Forte 6u1 C compiler bug? Worse in 6u2?
I have a rather large program containing a function which misbehaves intermittently with -xO3 optimization. The failure occurs on perhaps one run in ten.
A pointer variable local to the function appears to be corrupted by a call to another function. (It's ok before, and bad after the call.) The corrupted pointer value then usually causes a BUS error, rarely a SEGV (depending on its divisibility by 8, I assume).
Adding printf() calls showed the corrupt value (lately, 0x800000002 has been popular) using 6u1. After updating to 6u2, the intermittent corruption remains, but now the printf() itself fails, as it apparently tries to dereference the pointer (for some mysterious reason) instead of just displaying it. Dbx (6u2) says:
Read from unallocated (rua):
Attempting to read 1 byte at address 0x800000002
stopped in _doprnt at 0x7fef5189d54
0x000007fef5189d54: doprnt+0x0160: ba,a doprnt-0xda41c
(/opt/forte6u2/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) where
=>[1] _doprnt(0x100327630, 0xffffffff7fffefc0, 0x100327630, 0xff291400, 0x0, 0x0), at 0x7fef5189d54
[2] _fprintf(0x0, 0x800000002, 0x7fef52be228, 0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x100327db0), at 0x7fef518d088
[3] <my_stuff ...>
The (newly) offending statement looks like this:
fprintf( pfCFile, " a = %016lx.\n", assign);
where "assign" is the pointer to a structure of some sort.
Does anyone have any helpful hints or will I need to spend the $1599 to create an incident?-xO2 is enough to cause the failure.
Making the vulnerable pointer "static" fixes the problem, although this should make no difference.
My guess is over-eager register reuse, but I'm open to alternative theories.
Maybe you are looking for
-
My iphone does not recognize saved contact number while having incoming calls due to country and area code as auto prefix. How do i fix the problem. How do i ensure that the phone recognize calls with and without the country and area code. Please tex
-
I'm not receiving any audio in AE CC. Please help..
Hello, I searched and searched for this answer on our thread but couldn't find anything other than a few posts from 2010 that didn't really help me out. If there are any recent discussions that cover this, please point me in that direction. Last week
-
How to set the timeout to execute sql by jdbc?
Connection con = getConnection(); Statement stmt = con.createStatement(); stmt.execute("update table1 set colum1='abc' where key = '1' ");before run this java class I exectue the sql(update table1 set colum1='abc' where key = '1' ) in sqlplus but not
-
Hi Experts, We have a JDBC to FILE scenario. In SXMB_MONI, the XML structure is like this : <row> <F1>No</F1> <F2>2006-05-15 00:00:00.0</F2> <F3>Ball Screw Inspection Tool - see ECM HS-060004-ECM</F3> </row> In RWB, it becomes like this
-
View list of all songs in itunes match
Hello, Is there any way to see a list or even create a document with all the songs I have uploaded to Itunes Match, besides just seeing them displayed in Itunes? Thanks