FPY1 - making payment on account

Hi,
We have a requirement to make a payment on a collective parent account in FPY1 run (direct debit method). Now we tried to change the net amount field of entry in table t_610 in event  610 , however, I see there is a validation which doesnt allow me to make a payment greater than the amount open on the account . Also, if I try to skip the validation in debug , i get yet another error message saying document is inconsistent as the payment amount cannt be distributed among open items.
If I try to make payment less than the open items- it is working fine ..
Basically the requirement is to change the payment amount in FPY1 run to an amount greater than the open amount .
Any help would be appreciated!
Regards,
AM

Hi Ankit,
I think William is right.FPY1 is based on existing open items only.But if you got queries you can revert back here.
Thanks & Regards,
SMG.

Similar Messages

  • Document closed while making payments on account

    Dear all,
    I'm facing the following issue.
    Eg:-
    I have created one AR/AP invoice for letsay 'x' business partner for INR.10000.
    While making incoming or outgoing payments,when i'm choosing this BP,all the open invoices will appear one by one.Now i've choosed this particular invoice and in payment means I entered Rs.3000 by cheque as part payment but i forgot to change the amount in incoming/outgoing payments window against the particular line item.So the following mssge appears
    " INR -7,000.00 of the amount to be paid is not matched to existing transactions. Transfer this difference to new posting?"
    if i said yes-the document is added.
    Now the issue is:-
    Next time when i choose the same party no due is showing for that bill but entry passed only for 3000 INR & the particular AR/AP invoice also get closed even if it is a mistake.the system shouldn't accept this.
    Please guide me regarding this
    Thanks & Rgds
    Suresh Kannan
    Edited by: Marc Riar on Jan 31, 2008 1:18 PM

    Suresh,
    This is an issue with how the functionality works. 
    If you highlight the invoice and then short pay it by entering a different amount in the payment means windows, SAP marks this invoice closed.
    If you do not highlight any invoice then the payment is posted on account and later can be linked to an invoice using Link invoices to payments
    To fix your current situation please cancel incoming payment and redo it.
    Suda

  • A/P Invoice - Payment on account

    Hi All
    Initially without raising an A/P Invoice to a Vendor ( there was no single A/P invoice generated against this vendor),  we raised Outgoing Payments say 10,000 as Payment On Account to this Vendor.  At a later stage we raised an A/P Invoice for 2000.  Now if I open outgoing payment window for this Vendor I can see two transactions one with payment on account with 1000 and another A/P Invoice.  Now I want to close this A/P Invoice without making any payments from the payment means window. Because I  have already made some payment in advance as payment on account,  ... from this amount (10,000) the A/P Invoice amount (2,000) should be deducted / adjusted and the A/P invoice should be closed. 
    Please let me know whether this is possible.
    Thanks
    SV Reddy

    Use this very tricky way:
    - Activate Over/Under payment in the Document Setting > Per Documents > Outgoing Payment. Lets say, USD 1.
    - Set the g/l in the G/L Account Determination for Over/Under Payment in Purchase tab to let say, Other Expenses.
    - Go to the Outgoing Payment, choose the invoice. Tick option for "Payment On Account" then change the amount to "-2000"
    => Total Amount Due = 0
    - Chose payment means, cash. Choose the same account as in the Over/Under Payment => Other Expenses. Value = 0.01
    - Post the payment.
    SAP will produce an outstanding journal entry that will close the A/P Invoice, reduce the open outgoing payment and zero finance impact journal entry (Dr/Cr to Other Expense 0.01) as you describe.
    Cheers,
    Dody

  • Input credit on Service tax after making payment to vendors

    Dear Friends,
    Vendor invoice has been entered with Input service tax and payment has been made to the vendor. After making the payment, it is only clearing the vendor balance and not the input service tax G/L accounts entered on the invoice.
    We tried to implement deferred tax functionality (RFUMSV50 program), but here most of the input tax codes are based on the combination of Service tax with VAT. Hence we couldnt proceed further as deferred tax functionality is not applicable for VAT portion and applicable only for Service Tax here as it is a service based industry. In short, the requirement is Input credit can be taken for Service Tax only after making payment to the vendor.
    Could you please let me know is there any mechanism where we can identify whether vendor invoice has been paid or not from the Input Service Tax GL accounts (either in FBL3N or FAGLL03 tcode). Based on that if the document is cleared, then my client will only take all the cleared documents' input service tax amounts and will set off with the output service tax.
    Regards,
    Dwarak.

    HI,
    Kindly go through the SAP note no.921634 & do the configuration accordingly.
    Regards
    Anuj

  • How to reflect a new field in Bank data while making payment through F-53?

    Hello Experts,
    How can i reflect a new field (payment reference) in bank data while making payment through F-53?
    I have tried to do it by Field status group(OBC4) but the same is replicating in vendor invoice but not in vendor payment.
    I tried it at both level,fsg anf posting key,But no use.
    Is there any other process to make available and required field in BANK DATA of vendor payment?
    Please suggest .
    Regards,
    Sumeya offrin

    Hello Sumeya,
    Please consider note 145864 which explains what you have to do to
    make this field visible in your selection criteria:
    "In Transaction FB00 (Financial Accounting Editing Options -> Open items
    activate the flag 'Payment reference as selection criterion'.
    This is valid for incoming payment; please test if the same procedure
    is valid for outgoing payment as well.
    I  check the  issue, and unfortunately these function seems to not be supported for vendor open items.
    When you try to select the 'Payment Reference' in Additional selections
    the following messages is arised:
    'No account specified, items selected via document no. or reference'
    That means,when you do not specify an account in F-53 you can only
    via Reference and/or document. This is not a bug but system design.
    For additional reference you can check the note 451105.
    The note made clear that the specification of an account is required for vendors during the selection via payment
    reference.
    Kind Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Validation for bank while making payment to Vendors

    Hi All,
    We want the system to validate the bank balance while making payment to Vedors via f-53,f-58,f110 or any other payment transaction,
    Eg;
    Available Balance in Bank ; 25,000/-
    Payment to vendor must be restricted to max of 25000/-  or less than 25000/-
    The system must allow us to make payment more that the available bank balance(less the minimum balance that has to been maintained at bank).
    Where & How can i capture this requirement in the system.
    Appreciate your responce in time  and your patience too
    Regards

    Dear Raghu,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Our requirement is not the minimun bank balance.
    Our requirement is that the system must not allow us to run any payment beyond the available amount in the bank account.
    for eg : if we have 10 lacs as on day in our bank account,we must be in the position to make payment to vendor to max extend of 10 lacs only not more than that.
    At present the system not having any control in this.....
    How can i do it in OB28...bcoz we have 5 account.1.Main Bank,2.Chq Incoming,3.Chq Outgoing,4.Cash With drawal & 5.Cash Deposit.
    Can you let me know how can we bring this in the system to validate the out going payment.
    Regards

  • Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

    When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
    Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
    Message no. AU133
    Please help me to rectify the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Deepak

    HI
    Please pay attention at  the possible causes of message AU133:
    1. Error AU133:
       a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
    structure.
       b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
    2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not  permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct               
       (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
       for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
    3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
    4.Check if you need  revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
      -Revaluation acquis. and production costs
      -Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
    Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
    the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
    Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • ITunes is updated and works fine and I am able to log onto my account. When I go to purchase a song, I get the error message "Your Apple ID has been disabled". I've tried different methods: changing passwords, making a new account with another email addre

    iTunes is updated and works fine and I am able to log onto my account. When I go to purchase a song, I get the error message "Your Apple ID has been disabled". I've tried different methods: changing passwords, making a new account with another email address, and emailing itunes tech support. I am curious as to how many others have been experiencing the same issue. When I googled the error, it seemed like it was happening extremely often with many people.
    We all love their products, but they always come with a lot of issues and horrible customer support.
    My apple Id is [email protected]

    My Iphone 4 is telling me the same thing and I believe I figured out what the problem is.  I had some fraudulent charges on my itunes account, so I call my bank and disputed the charges.  Right after I did that, I started getting the message "Your apple ID has been disabled."  I just realized today that the charges are not fraudulent, they are "in app purchases."  One of my daughters downloaded the game Top Girl which is FREE, but in the game Top Girl you use money in the game to purchase things.  It just so happens that the money you use to purchase things is real money MY Money!!!.  My daughter thought she was using play money in the game and had no idea she was using real money.  She spent $106.00 buying stuff.  Now I have to call the bank and tell them to release the hold and pay Itunes.  I'm hoping this solves the problem.  Here is the link to learn how to disable "in app purchase" on your iphone or ipad.
    http://www.ikidapps.com/2010/12/parents-avoid-accidental-app-purchases-how-to-tu rn-off-in-app-purchasing.html

  • Payment on Account in Incoming payment

    Dear All,
    We are creating a addon for incoming payment through DI API. We are adding incoming payment based on journal entry and Invoice. While creating this entry in incoming payment, Payment on account checkbox is automatically enabled for the balance amount if the amount of  incoming payment is less than the value of Invoice or outstanding in the journal entry. In this scenario we are unable to do the next incoming payment for the same invoice or the same journal entry(Customer outstanding amount). The following is the coding we are using for this purpose. Can any one suggest us as how to solve this problem.?
                                    ocompany.GetNewObjectCode(CStr(jeno))
                                    oPmt = ocompany.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oIncomingPayments)
                                    oPmt.DocType = SAPbobsCOM.BoRcptTypes.rCustomer
                                    sNum = invno
                                    oPmt.CardCode = custcode
                                    oPmt.Invoices.InvoiceType = SAPbobsCOM.BoRcptInvTypes.it_JournalEntry
                                    oPmt.Invoices.DocEntry = jeno
                                    oPmt.Remarks = crno
                                    oPmt.DocDate = docdate.Date
                                    oPmt.DocTypte = SAPbobsCOM.BoRcptTypes.rCustomer
                                    oPmt.CashSum = chqsum
                                    If oPmt.Add() <> 0 Then
                                        MessageBox.Show(ocompany.GetLastErrorDescription)
                                        SBO_Application.MessageBox("Problem in Payment for Invoice no: " & crno & " Problem found is - " & ocompany.GetLastErrorDescription)
                                    Else
                                    End If
    Regards,
    Chandramohan

    Hello Thiya,
    see this thread: [Re: How to do an incoming payment based on journal entry whit SDK ?]
    I did post some example code from the sdk help.
    HTH
    Regards Teun Aben

  • DRQ payment on account with reference to an invoice

    Hello,
    In SBO2005A  there was a problem with the open balance BP concerning the next situation
    create an in- or outgoing payment by
    1. select the customer/vendor
    2. Select an invoice (example invoice 100 EUR)
    3. go to moneybag and enter an amount of 99 EUR
    4. Try to save the payment.
    5. system will give you a message the amount to be paid is not equals the invoice SAVE payment
    So far so good.
    Now when you save the invoice also in SBO2007A you will save the invoice with reference to that payment and the mark: payment on account will be active. the only improvement from SBO2005A and SBO2007A is that at least the balance is correct ( this scenario is one of the fixes when upgrade to sbo2007A reconciliation errors).
    In my opinion this is wrong behavior. One way or the other. A payment is with reference to an invoice and then it would be in this case a partial payment or the payment is on account and then there should be no reference to that invoice.
    In my opinion the correct behavior must be after saving the payment:  error message: please create a partial payment or select payment on account because selected amount and payment amount are not equal.
    With regards,
    Eddy Rademakers

    Hello Kerstin,
    I know this functionality and It could be usefull when the over under payment is just a small amount.
    But in principal even with this functionality in my opinion a payment could be only
    a payment with reference to one or more invoices or a payment on account and not both as it is now in the current SBO.
    The current behavior is wrong:
    Based on the scenario as described above the payment should be: the mark: payment on account YES.
    and no relation to the invoice(s).
    with regards,
    Eddy

  • Down Payment Interim Account In SAP 8.8

    Dear All,
    Please let me know the use of Down Payment Interim Account under sales and purchase tab in gl account determination in SAP 8.8. I have tried some transactions but the same is not getting affected. Is it applicable for India Localization?
    Regards
    Kapil

    Hi Kapil,
    It is applicable for India Localization. And when you are going to do Incoming payment on base of "A/R Down Payment Request" then your "Down Payment Interim Account" will hit. In payment Dr effect goes to this GL and when you will link "A/R Down Payment Request" in "AR Invoice" then  "Down Payment Interim Account" will nullify with CR effect.
    Thanks,
    Sachin

  • How to adjust Advance or Payment on Account against an Invoice for Customer

    Hi,
    I have to adjust, the Payment taken from the Customer as Advance or Payment on Account, against a particular invoice.
    How can i do the same in the system for the particular customer?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rachit Rastogi

    Hi Rachit,
               You can do it by Internal Reconciliation BP. Just follow the path. Go to Business Partner> Internal Reconciliations> Reconciliation--> Select the customer against which you need to adjust payment and click on reconcilation and here it will display all the Payment and invoices. Just select tick the paymnet against an On Account Payment which you want to adjust and reconcile it.......
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shambhu

  • Outgoing payment   on account pld

    Hello sap experts
    In an outgoing payment   on account pld   i have one UDT  table which my invoices are tracked in to that now  i want to tract the details of invoice is it possible IN PLD PLS ANSWER ASAP
    REGARDS
    JENNY

    Hi Jenny,
    It is not possible on PLD.
    Try to Create Query PLD.
    Check the below thread, you will be get some idea or answer.
    Re: Issue in PLD of Out going Payment
    Re: PLD- outgoing payment .(RCT4 ,tables data is not comming)
    Regards,
    Madhan.

  • Payment on account document type showing JE

    Hi All,
    Have a question around the system behaviour of the following scenario:
    a.     Create a payment on account for BP X
    b.     Open the Incoming Payment screen again and enter BP X
    c.     The list of transactions show the above payment as JE instead of RC. It also shows it in blue instead of the normal black fonts
    JE is for Journal Entry, but this is not a Journal Entry, it is an Incoming Payment, so shouldnu2019t it say RC? We are thinking it doesnu2019t make sense to say JE when it is an Incoming Payment. The SAP Help (on Incoming Payments: Customer & Vendor - Table Area) says: u201CDocument Type: Displays the type of document or transaction. For example, IN represents A/R invoiceu201D.
    Also, the Document Number column shows the Journal Entry transaction number, not the Incoming Payment number. For all other documents, when you click on the orange arrow next to the document number it takes you to the originating document, but in this case it takes you to the Journal Entry.
    Is there a possibility this might be changed in future versions?
    Many Thanks,
    Matt

    Hi......
    Link the field of Account code to OACT and display the Account name.
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Customer as Vendor --while making payment f110 how to deduct line item wise

    Dear all ,
    My Requirement like this please help me come out this issue.
    we have 5 company code , we have created customer as a vendor.In one company code ,for eg(10000 is a customer and mean time same as Customer as  Vendor(10000) in another company code.
    Now we have raised customer invoice ,
    For eg   10000 for fertilizer.
                  10000 for Drip irrigation
                  20000  some loan.
    These transaction incurred in one company code.
    In other company code these customer as a vendor ,
    Here we have enter Vendor invoice,
    For ex Invoice amount is 70000.
    while making payment i want to deduct this amount from customer invoice amount.
    like in 10000 for Fertilizer in that ,I want to deduct partial  amount in line item level  for different purpose.
    How to deduct this amount .and how to map this scenario in the system.
    Please guide me come out of this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Girish.

    Hi
    vendor and same as a customer functionally is possible with in one company code.  in that case you will be able to clear the customer open items when you are doing the vendor payment.  
    but in my knowledge this functionally is not possible with other company codes. as per your query you are maintained the vendor in one company code and customer in another company code.  you want to clear the line items with one transaction in F110.
    i think its not possible.  becuase payments and receivables are with in company code.  
    Regards
    Ram

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to load a default value in to a column when using sql loader

    Im trying to load from a flat file using sql loader. for 1 column i need to update using a default value how to go about this?

  • I-Photo keeps quitting when i try and open it

    Help! Everytime i try and open i-photo is immediately quits unexpectedly. I have tried re-installing it, deleting all my photos in it, going to the genius bar for help! So i think what might have caused it was my hard drive was full up and i moved al

  • Solaris 8 ufsrestore issues

    Hello all, this is my first post here. I am experiencing a strange issue when attempting to do a ufsrestore of an entire backed up OS (Sol 8) The restore goes fine but some time after the new server is up and running I start getting these errors; # J

  • 10.6.2 sees XP, but XP won't see 10.6.2 machines

    So this seems to be the opposite problem of what everyone else is having. We have a leopard and a snow leopard machine that could see and be seen on WinXP as of Friday. Monday, the Snow Leopard machine can still connect to Win XP, but can no longer s

  • Scaling a clip in FCP x10.0.8 doen't seem to work.

    Scaling a clip in FCP x10.0.8 doen't seem to work. The clip I am trying to effect is above the story line. When I try and adjust it notghin happens.