FTTC Cabinet upgrade review process

Is there a way I can request a review on particular cab? I live in a relatively new development with 200+ properties and I can't fathom why when the cab on the edge of the development has been upgraded yet we haven’t.
Is there an appeal process I can go through to at least to have our cab reassessed. I appreciate there maybe technical as well as commercial reason why this hasn't been upgraded.

There's no way to find out or appeal anything I'm afraid. The best you can do is get as many people who are served from that cabinet to register their interest here - http://www.superfast-openreach.co.uk/expression-gen.aspx
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Similar Messages

Fttc cabinet upgrade

Hi I moved into a new build apartments and my new phone line has been hooked upto a old cabinet 55 but most of my neighbours are connected to the fibre cabinet 44 can my line be changed to a different cabinet or when will this cabinet be upgraded post code is RM125DH I connected to cab 55 at the hot church exchange many thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi gpdarkins,
Have you checked here :- Superfast Essex website
Essex County Council has signed a deal with BT to extend fibre broadband to around 87% of Essex by the end of summer 2016.
This means that Essex will fall significantly behind the original target in Essex of 90% of premises gaining access to superfast speeds by 2015.
Essex County Council is committing £6.46m to the project, with another £6.46m coming from BDUK. BT will contribute £11.7m. The very first premises are expected to be upgraded by June 2014.
Best regards,
dfenceman

FTTC Cabinet P2 Billinge

Hi, as like everyone else our FTTC cabinet upgrade has moved numerous times, now showing March 2014.
When I check with Openreach when and where I get a yellow pin with the following message
This marker shows cabinet: P2
Which is linked to exchange: BILLINGE
Please note: This is the intended area for the cabinet that will provide fibre broadband services to your postcode. We're sorry but it’s taking us longer than planned to get your cabinet ready for service. Please bear with us.
We're sorry that the work we are doing to bring fibre broadband to your area is taking longer than first planned. This can be for many reasons that include blocked underground cable routes, issues with providing electrical power to the cabinet and issues with the cabinet’s location. Please bear with us while we work to resolve this which may take some time. We will continue to work on this and apologise for any inconvenience this has caused.
Has anyone else had a similar message and how much longer did you have to wait before your cabinet was updated and you could order BT Infinity?
Thanks
Darren

Time varies depending on the actual problem i am afraid all you can do for now is wait
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

T61 Upgrading Order Process

Hi Everyone,
I've already read through several of the upgrade threads for the T61 and have watched a couple of YouTube videos on it. However, I need help with how to order the steps of my upgrade (ie, which comes first).
I recently bought a refurbished Lenovo T61 Notebook Intel Core 2 Duo 1.80GHz 2GB Memory 80GB HDD 14.1" Windows 7 Home Premium (32 bit), and I am planning on upgrading the RAM and HDD.So, I also bought:
* 4GB 2X 2GB DDR2 667MHz PC2-5300 PC2-5400 DDR2 667 (200 PIN) SODIMM Laptop Memory, and
* Crucial M500 240GB SATA 2.5-Inch 7mm Internal Solid State Drive CT240M500SSD1.
I don't have anything of importance installed on the T61, so I plan on doing a clean installation. I've downloaded the win7 premium 64 bit ISO, and the win7 USB/DVD download tool (I don't have the disc, just the key).
I really need help putting these upgrade steps in order. This is what I'm thinking so far:
Step1: Install SDD.
Step2: Reinstall Win7 64 bit from USB.
Step3: Install the 4GB RAM.
Step4: Install Middleton's BIOS.
Step5: Install the latest Crucial's Intel Rapid Storage Technology (RST) driver (fixes problems with Windows Updater -- accd to Amazon reviews).
Step6: Run Windows Updater to get latest updates.
I've read in other threads that you had to have a stable system before the Middleton BIOS, so I'm not really sure where that step comes in. I just don't want to fry my new(old) laptop. Oh, and do I need the 4GB RAM installed before trying to run Win7 64bit?
Thank you so much for your help!

Hi Everyone,
Thought y'all might like an update. I've nearly finished the upgrade/update process -- I've been working on it all day.
Bottom line: Sweet success thanks to all of your helpful replies.
Here's the actual process that I used if you're curious...
Pre-work:
Made the bootable USB drives
Took off password
Disabled security chip
Fully charged battery
Plugged in
Step1: Installed Middleton BIOS while running my 32bit Win7.
Tried to run in Safe Mode, but got the “drivers failed to load” message. Went back to normal, booted it while in Windows, and SUCCESS!!
Step2: Installed SSD.
Easy. Done quickly.
Step3: Installed 4 GB RAM.
Watched the YouTube video on it and got out my trusty screwdriver. Was able to unscrew three of the four screws. Spent about an hour googling ways to “remove a stuck screw in a laptop” and trying out the techniques. No luck and I was getting a little frustrated, so I decided that I will upgrade the RAM later when I take somewhere (a computer shop?) to get the screw out. I only need the 2 gb of RAM to run Win7 64 bit for the moment. To be done at a later date - maybe tomorrow.
Step4: Installed Crucial's Firmware Update Utility program and ran.
The M500 was already running the latest firmware.
Step5: Reinstalled Win7 64 bit from USB.
Used Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool and the Home Premium 64 bit iso from digital river.
Loaded the two files onto a newly formatted USB drive and plugged that into the laptop. Got the “NTLDR is missing message”, so I spent a couple of hours googling what to do. I checked the BIOS startup and it was already set to boot from my USB drive. I looked into the iso file from my other computer and saw that there wasn’t an NTLDR file. So, I spent a while trying to find this file so I could download it. Couldn’t find it, so I took a break.
Reformatted my USB and ran the usb/dvd tool again. This time, at the end of the steps, the window status was: “Files copied successfully. However, we were unable to run boot sect to make the USB device bootable…” A-ha… That’s what it was.
I went to a family computer that was running Windows 8, and decided to burn the programs to a DVD-R instead. I still used the Win7 USB/DVD tool (which worked).
DVD worked. Install took 40 mins with 2 restarts.
Step6: Install Crucial's RST driver.
Didn't. I'm not using the old HDD, but when I do, I'll probably install this.
Step7: Get Lenovo updates.
Some of the first few downloads I tried required updated items (like .NET 4.0, etc.). So, I decided to run Windows Updater first - which needed an update as well.
Step8: Run Windows Updater.
1 hour and 32 minutes, 168 updates, 2 restarts.
Step 9: Download anti-virus software.
Check.
Step 10: Downloaded Lenovo updates.
10 minutes and 13 updates.
Step 11: Re-do boot order.
And, that, is a happy laptop!
Tomorrow I'll get the screw out so I can upgrade my RAM, but I'm done for tonight.
Much love to you all!
Cheers!

Can I set up a review process in LiveCycle? Is what I want to do, at all possible? Anyone chime in.

What is the best way to set up a review process, without violating the EULA and having a form that is editable by the end user AFTER it is submitted.
Basically the process will go like this..
1. A user will log onto our website and click a link where he or she downloads a dynamic form.
2. The user will submit the form to multiple parties at once. (Conditional e-mail, depending on what sections in the form are filled out, different people will get the form)
3. The form will get reviewed, and if any changes need to be made, the person that originally filled out the form will need to get it back and make the necessary changes. (The forms are long, so they can't start from scratch).
4. After the changes have been made, the form will be re-submitted for final review.
5. After the form has been finalized, the completed form will be distributed to about 80 people within the company (attached to an e-mail or something) and these people will use the data within the form to populate what they need to.
Additional information:
-I am the only one that has Acrobat 9 Standard OR Professional.
-Everyone else has Reader only
-The forms are dynamic
-They have to be posted to a website
Is this at all possible? I can't figure out how this can be done.
I hope that was clear, please ask if you have questions.

Hi,
You can Reader Enable a form in Acrobat v9 Standard, however note the EULA with the restriction on 500 unique recipients. If it is going out to less than 500 you are not limited to the number of data processes that you undertake on the form.
See discussion here on Reader Enabling a form: http://assure.ly/etkFNU.
You would need to Reader Enable the form before you put it up on the web page.
You can script a regular button to submit the form to user-entered email addresses. See here: http://assure.ly/eUR4wJ. The first email button could be used to send out the form for review. The last section in the form could be a text field to allow reviewers to add comments and a second email button that would issued the amended form back to the originator for further action.
Both email buttons would get their email address(s) from completed fields in the form. In addition the email submission can be set up to return the PDF form and not just the data. IF the form is Reader Enabled then users with Reader will be able to complete this action.
Hope that helps,
Niall

Apple seriously needs to fix the review process

I know this has been discussed ad nauseam but I'm really frustrated about how reviews are handled by Apple.
I mean, what gives? Are they treating us like dirt because A) they don't care because devs are rushing to the iPhone platform or B) they are overwhelmed by submissions?
One of my apps has been in review for over 2 weeks (I know... some have been over a month so why am I complaining?) and there's no way to know when it's made available (if ever... Apple criteria's seem to change from day to day). 1 hour? 1 day? 1 week? 1 month? Who knows!
Every day my app stays "In Review", I'm losing money from potential sales. It would be nice to get at least an estimate of when your app will be reviewed. Or, at least Apple could tell us a bit more about the review process so we understand how it works and don't panic when apps don't get reviewed before several weeks.
It's sad because the iPhone platform is just terrific but what I dislike is the fact that once you send your app for review, you lose control over it. The App Store does have it's advantages, but I think it's getting sour and while launching a desktop app might be more demanding money-wize and marketing-wize, at least you keep control of your distribution and you can release your product when you see fit, at not have it standing in review forever without knowing when you'll see a return on your investment.
The lact of information is very unfortunate and I just hope that the answer to my first question in B).

Does anyone have a phone number to call? Hard to believe paying developers have nobody to call.
I don't mind waiting, but I sure as **** want to know if there is something in my app that they are waiting on ME for.
It wouldn't kill them to have each guy in the review phase check a single box to say what he has reviewed and then notify you by email.
Has anyone reading this been able to talk to anybody at Apple, just to make sure that they aren't waiting for something to be added to the upload or fixed in the binary?
I submitted 2 apps - the one on the 24th sailed through and has sold 150 copies.
The one on the 26th is still sitting in review.

REVIEW PROCESS USING WORKFLOW:CANNOT FIND 'SUBMIT FOR REVIEW' LINK/BUTTON

We installed Oracle Workflow in the Files Storage database and completed all
the required steps for integrating Workflow with Files sucessfully. This
morning, I started trying to test the functionality of review process, but
could not locate the 'Submit for Review' link/button any where. All other
(workflow related) links are visible. For e.g. I can see 'workflow' link on top
right hand corner of the page. Also, I see 'Review Process' links that shows no
review processes as I have not created any.
The documentation is not clear as how to create the review process. Could any one, please let
me know how to find this 'Submit for Review' button/link?
Thanks
Hari Abburu

the submit for review process is available for workspaces - create one, assign members, upload a document.

Updating a Book During the Review Process

Does anyone have any advice/experience with updating a book while it is still in the review process?
I have a book currently being reviewed, but just realized that one of the images in there is reversed. I also heard from a source that needs to change a citation in our back-of-book appendix. Both are not huge deals, and I could just wait to update after the book is successfully in the iTunes store.
However, if I did update the book now, would that screw up the review process? Not sure what happens if Apple is reviewing a book, and another version of the book is uploaded during the process.

Apparently, if you push an update, the book in the store is taken off sale until the process is wrapped up...
If you replace an asset under review, the process has to come to a halt, pick up the new content and start again. How that affects the queue could depend on if the review is being done by the same person and how busy their queue is, etc.
See Once my book is uploaded, how long before it appears in iTunes?

Configuration of User Access Review process

Hi,
I'm new to the forum.
I´m looking at the User Access Review process in CUP.
I would like implement the User Access Review request. So, my question is:
1. Where take GRC the data to make the analysis? I need to know the exactly place where data are collected (which table, transaction code or statistical data)
In case that GRC use the backend tables, I should be aware of time that tables are operational in the system, correct?
2. Otherwise, how affects this analysis the performance in backend system?
3. I have read that it is possible obtain reports with use of Action Usage. The report that I mention is: RAR --> Informer --> Security Reports --> Miscellaneous --> Action Usage by User
Where does it gets information from? Could be data in the same place that use User Access Review process?
4. Is it possible to introduce another actors in the Reviewers (In Configuration Tab, User Review > Options > User Review pane)? Now, the reviewers configured are Manager or Role Owner.
5. To set User Access Reviews, I need some additional technical or is an automatic procedure?
If there is any requirements that I should be taken into account please, let me know.
Thanks in advance
Marta

Hi,
I have found this document that answers all my questions: www.sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b05010a3-ed45-2c10-79b2-96df60a6bf2b
So, now I have another question:
The GRC Access Control that I have, ERM is not configured and there is no communication with it; (only RAR and CUP are configured). So, I would like to know if it´s possible configured User Access Review apart from ERM.
To realize the Role Usage Synchronization job in ERM, the transaction usage information from RAR alert data is needed. The job also obtains role to user assignments and role content information from the back-end systems. Access Control then translates the transaction usage information into role usage.
If this information could be extracted from the backend tables, I am looking for an alternative to way to load data in the system, regardless ERM. Is it possible?
Thanks in advance
Marta

Bit of Advice about FTTC cabinets

Hi all,
In my village we have all had FTTC cabinets installed, which is great however every cabinet has been powerd on and is accepting orders apart from the one that serves my property, it is cabinet no 19 and my post code is SG8 5JX.
I checked the BT wholesale checker and still tells me can only get up to 1.5 meg.
Anyone have any idea why it taking so long to switch on one cabinet or any more information on when it be turned on
Thanks
Paul D

most likely reason is that all testing openreach do before the cab goes live has not yet been completed just a matter of waiting the wholesale checker will advise you of the date your cab should go live all you can do is keep checking
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Application Submitted 3 Months Ago, Still in Review Process

I enrolled for the iOS developer program June 8th, and faxed in the requested documents June 9th.
It has been almost 3 months now and my account is still in the review process.
I have emailed 10 times and called 3 times. Email replys say they have recieved the document I faxed and that it is in que to be looked at. Phone calls confirm the same that they have received the document but a different department handles the verification process and that they will pass along the word to try and get it sped up.
This process has been a complete nightmare. Anyone else experiencing this?

Hi rossgoodridge,
Welcome to the forum and thanks for posting.
I am sorry that you are still getting bills even though your service has ended with BT. I can lend a hand with this.
Can you send me in your details using the "Contact The Mods" link found in my profile and I will take it from there.
Cheers,
OlgaC
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

What's the Point of the AppStore Review Process?

I was initially pleased when I heard that developers would have to pay a $99 joining fee and submit apps to a stringent review process for the iPhone, because surely that would keep the quality app ratio high and reduce the number of half-baked stinkers being published right? Wrong.
I reckon well over half of the apps in the AppStore are utter trash or are so buggy or feature-incomplete as to be unusable. Of the remaining half, at least half of those are clones of a superior competing products, and most of the rest do no justice at all to the iPhone's polished UI design. I reckon 10% of the apps really deserve their place in the store.
It makes me wonder what Apple do during the review process. So far, we've seen a $999 application that shows you a picture of a ruby gem, about 10 torch applications that show you the colour white (some not even free), a tasteless application that shows a picture of a knife, apps whose descriptions are written in English so poor as to convey no meaning, and more to-do lists than there are atoms in the known universe, none of which can remind you when you have something to do. That's not to mention otherwise good apps that are too buggy and unstable. If I didn't know otherwise, I'd bet my mortgage that access to upload apps was completely unrestricted based on quality.
All this would be fine if the review process didn't actually hinder developer's efforts to fix urgent bugs or security issues by delaying updates for up to 4 weeks. I'm getting really tired of seeing app descriptions that say "update pending review adds feature x" and then having to wait weeks to actually get feature x. If the review process is intended to secure a reputation of quality and trustworthiness for the AppStore, I say it is having the reverse effect.

According to TUAW, "Apple is busy rejecting Applications from the App Store for grammar mistakes in onboard help files (not a joke) and for not presenting the user with the best playability options (also not a joke). Many of these frustrated developers tell us that some of their products have been waiting for review for four weeks": http://www.tuaw.com/2008/07/25/iphone-2-1-sdk-disappointments/3 ...so somebody's wrong here.
I enjoy my iPhone as much as the next user, but I'm already getting weary of sifting through page after page of stinkers every few days looking for the odd gem. Lots of platforms suffer from this problem - Konfabulator Widgets, Firefox Addons, Microsoft Sidebar to name a few. Call me elitist, but I think all of these platforms would benefit greatly from a higher degree of quality filtering.
I suppose I'm just frustrated that the small number of apps I consider worthwhile are having their development cycle massively extended by Apple's need to sift through truck loads of crud from second rate developers dollar signs in their eyes and no imagination.

Do books ever disappear during the review process?

I uploaded several books and when I went to Manage Your Books it gave me the usual red dot.
Then a couple days later the books I just uploaded were GONE. No red dots.... no orange dots.... no green dots..... and no notifications, emails, or tickets.... Does this ever happen during the review process? Thank you for your time!

You posted this on another group. Its is not advisable to repeat your posts everywhere.. I gave you a suggestion to get an answer to your problem.

After 10.6.3 upgrade: "translate" process running constantly

Just upgraded to 10.6.3 Since the upgrade a process called "translate" is running in in Activity monitor constantly. It's taking a pretty constant 99% CPU (out of 400% total on my 4-core).
I don't remember seeing that process before and it surely should not be sitting there eating up CPU.
As I write, it's been doing this for 8 or 9 hours.
Regards,
Peter G.

Have had the same problem with the translate process. My system got so bogged down and screwed up while I tried to correct this (with several calls to Apple Support) that I did a full system restore via Time Machine to 3/20/2010. The restore took 12.5 hrs due in large part to 10K+ photos on my hard drive, but after the restore, everything worked fine (no translate process running) until I got the auto-upgrade notice and upgraded to Snow Leopard 10.6.3 (plus several other Apple apps)--again the translate process now runs at 99-100%. The only solution I can see until Apple fixes this is quit the process using the Activity Monitor via the CPU Usage screen. The positive point in all of this is that Time Machine works as advertised. I had tried to reinstall the OS from the installation disk, but the installation failed x3.

Multi state collaborative review process using SharePoint

I need to route documents through a multi state collaborative review process using SharePoint. SharePoint must determine the distribution list at each stage. However, I can't find a way to upload the document for collaborative review without Acrobat trying to control the distribution.
Useing: Acrobat X Pro. & SharePoint 2010

Can you explain what you mean by controlling the distribution?

FTTC Cabinet upgrade review process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for