FV60-Complex Posting

Hi Friends.
Can we make use of complex posting in T.Code FV60-Vendor invoice parking like in T.Code FB60 for complex posting?
Thanks in advance.
Srini

Hello,
Neither FV60 nor FB60 is called complex posting. They are easy transaction. There is no difference except FV60 is used for parking and FB60 is for posting.
Complex postings means F-02, F-43 etc. (where you use posting keys)
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • Complex posting in FV60

    Hi,
    I see, "Complex posting" is de-active in FV60. It is available in FB60.
    My intension is to use "Fast data entry" option in FV60.
    Pls advise.
    Thanks,
    Pavan.

    HI,
    i'm sorry, but the requested functionality is not covered by the
    standard system. If you have parked a document with the Enjoy
    transactions, you should post it also with the Enjoy transactions.
    Moreover, from the Enjoy parking transactions, it is not possible to
    select 'Environment -> Complex posting'.
    355924 EnjoySAP parking (FV60 and so on): 'Complex posting'
    Reg
    Madhu M
    Edited by: M Madhu on Mar 17, 2009 10:52 AM

  • Complex Posting

    Hi experts,
    Complex Posting meny greyed out in FV60 (Park Vendor Invoice) screen but this menu is available via FB60 (Vendor Invoice).
    Can any one explain what is complex posting why it is used in FB60 and why it is greyed out in FV60.
    Thanks in advance
    G. Bhaskaran
    SAP FICO

    In Complex posting, consultants and experts can have their choice of posting by selecting the posting key and do all the entries as long as the doc type - allows account types.
    Only two Tcodes are used by consultants and experts from olden days - F-02 and F-04 - which will take care of most of the transactions. While using the Tcodes , system will take control the settings in PK, GL and display the fields - This will help consults whether the config is OK. In the same screen - the facility of fast entry screen is there - which allows only 40/50 posting keys..- further developed for new screen Enjoy SAP.
    In Enjoy SAP posting screens- you need to create separate variant - for entry - but however  while entering the data and saving - system will decide whether it can be entered or not as per GL - FSGrp definitions. Here you have option to select posting keys only 40/50 at the bottom screen- it is development from the fast line entry screen of complex posting -This screen is meant for users who will do only limited transactions. You have editing option for users for this screen separately to avoid mistakes by users and not asking for more informations. You will be able to move from Enjoy SAP to Complex posting and back while doing the transaction.
    Hope the above explanation will be of help to you.

  • BTE for complex posting in FB60

    Hi all,
    I implemented BTE 1030 and 1050 to capture the posting event via FB60 transaction. It works fine if I complete the document with the 'usual' post action.
    The problem occurs when I try to post with the funcion 'Complex Posting'.
    (FB60 --> Enviroment --> Complex Posting). In this case when i complete the document and post it the BTE don't works!! It looks SAP doesn't pass in the custom function implementation (1030 and 1050 interface). Can someone indicates me if exists some others BTE that I can use?
    Thanks!
    Lucio

    Transaction Code - FB60                     Enter Incoming Invoices
    Exit Name           Description
    RFAVIS01            Customer Exit for Changing Payment Advice Segment Text
    RFEPOS00            Line item display: Checking of selection conditions
    RFKORIEX            Automatic correspondence
    SAPLF051            Workflow for FI (pre-capture, release for payment)
    F050S001            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Edit user-defined IDoc segment
    F050S002            FIDCC1: Change IDoc/do not send
    F050S003            FIDCC2: Change IDoc/do not send
    F050S004            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2: Change outbound IDoc/do not send
    F050S005            FIDCMT, FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Change FI document
    F050S006            FI Outgoing IDoc: Reset Clearing in FI Document
    F050S007            FIDCCH Outbound: Influence on IDoc for Document Change
    F180A001            Balance Sheet Adjustment
    FARC0002            Additional Checks for Archiving MM Vendor Master Data
    FEDI0001            Function Exits for EDI in FI
    No of Exits:         14
    USER EXIT
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/code/abap26.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/what-is-user-exits.htm
    http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/HOWTO:Implement_a_screen_exit_to_a_standard_SAP_transaction
    http://www.easymarketplace.de/userexit.php
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sappoint.com/abap/userexit.pdfUser-Exit
    http://www.sap-img.com/ab038.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/64/72369adc56d11195100060b03c6b76/frameset.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/what-is-user-exits.htm
    http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/eac/knowledgebaseAnswer/0,295199,sid63_gci982756,00.html
    Rewards if useful.........
    Minal

  • Posting in Enjoy Screen and Complex Posting Screens

    Hi,
    I want to know the difference of posting in FB60/FB70 enjoy screens and the F-02 complex posting screens. Can someone tell me in what cases i have to use the F-02 screen by explaining a sample business transaction which cannot be posted in FB60 or FB70 but can be posted in F-02.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Both F-02 and the enjoy transactions FB60/70 serve the same purpose.  However, enjoy transaction make the entry look more simple and encourage a non functional user to enter correctly without any conflict as to debit/credit.
    In case of F-02, you need to select the posting keys.  These posting keys will define either the transaction needs to be debited or credited.  Though all the tcodes serve the same purpose, the following are the key differences
    1.  F-02 is used for different document types (AB, SA, RE etc.,).  It will be used for accounting as well as AP/AR entries if required.
    2.  In F-02, the posting keys define the document type.  For eg., if you use KN as the document type, you need to use posting key 21 or 31 to allow the system to enter the vendor code.  However, in case of FB60/70, you just need to select if the entry is a invoice or a credit memo and the credit and debit is already identified in the screen.
    3.  FB60/70 is more easier and exhaustive for the accountants to enter the data.  F-02 may not be useful in day to day entry of invoices.

  • Complex posting via inbounc IDoc

    Hi,
    we are implementing functionality to create FI invoices by inbound IDocs using IDoc type ABB_INVOICE_RECEIPT03. We need to have the IDoc import functionality access the complex posting functionality which we are used to access manually from transaction FB60.
    Unfortunately it seems to us that this functionality is not available when using this IDoc type. Are we correct about this? We hope not!
    Does anyone know how to implement complex posting functionality via IDoc?
    We have not found any SAP Notes about this either.
    We are running SAP 4.6c
    Thanks in advance for all kind assistance!
    Regards,
    Bernt Evensen

    In Complex posting, consultants and experts can have their choice of posting by selecting the posting key and do all the entries as long as the doc type - allows account types.
    Only two Tcodes are used by consultants and experts from olden days - F-02 and F-04 - which will take care of most of the transactions. While using the Tcodes , system will take control the settings in PK, GL and display the fields - This will help consults whether the config is OK. In the same screen - the facility of fast entry screen is there - which allows only 40/50 posting keys..- further developed for new screen Enjoy SAP.
    In Enjoy SAP posting screens- you need to create separate variant - for entry - but however  while entering the data and saving - system will decide whether it can be entered or not as per GL - FSGrp definitions. Here you have option to select posting keys only 40/50 at the bottom screen- it is development from the fast line entry screen of complex posting -This screen is meant for users who will do only limited transactions. You have editing option for users for this screen separately to avoid mistakes by users and not asking for more informations. You will be able to move from Enjoy SAP to Complex posting and back while doing the transaction.
    Hope the above explanation will be of help to you.

  • FB60 parking through Complex Posting

    Hi,
    I want to park a document through Complex posting (sap menu > enviroment > complex Posting ) in t code Fb60. i have created a screen variant for the same FB60 but when i entered in the Complex posting, the Save option is activated no Parking option is there. please guide me how to do it or any other way .
    Regards
    Aditya

    Hi,
    Try these steps. Looks funny but may work for you.
    1. Enter the transaction entries normally
    2. Simulate the entry by clicking the Simulate option from the heading DOCUMENT. You can see the entries.
    3. Now, try viewing the same document using General Ledger Display. The view will be in ALV format.
    4. Click Back button (Green coloured one).
    5. Now you will find the Park Document button.
    Hope it works
    Regards
    Hari

  • Similar screen like FB60 for Complex Posting

    Can someone help me what is the ABAP Logic behind screen/code created in FB60.
    i wan't to design a similar screen like FB60 but do not know from where to start the coding.
    please help me on this.
    thanks

    open tcode fb60(or what ever you want)
    in menu bar click on system->status.
    then a pop up window will apperar.
    in that double click on program name and you can see the code there.
    and youe it as per your requirement.

  • Error in documents parking and posting

    Hello,
    After I parked the document of vendor payment using F-65 , While I validate and post the documents using FBV0 I met a error as following:
    " Formatting error in the field BSEG-PRCTR; see next message
    Message no. 00298
    Diagnosis
    During batch input or when executing CALL TRANSACTION... USING a screen field was filled with an invalid input format.
    System Response
    Processing was terminated.
    Procedure
    The screen field has the technical name BSEG-PRCTR . The cause of the error is described in the following message.
    Correct  the appropriate BDC data."
    How can i add the field profit center in F-65 of in FBV0 while posting the parked document ?
    Thanks

    Hi Tarek
    at first please check field status transaction with OB14, OB41.
    Please also check in transaction OBC4 for the relevant field status variant and the relevant field status group in "Additional account assignments" that "Profit center is not set as required.                           
    do you have an asset line inside the document ?
    When a classicaly parked document or a document parked by the complex  posting via ENJOY is posted, a CALL TRANSACTION USING is run through. It can be compared with a batch-input session in the background.
    If a document is parked with an asset line, it might be that in the asset line account assignments were derived by parking the document, although they are not open for entry. For making sure, that the CALL TRANSACTION USING is not failing for such lines, the settings of the asset  accounting have to be disregarded and the fields have to be opend.
    Then only the fieldstatus of posting key and G/L account are regarded. Since the fieldstatus of PRCTR is defined as required, the posting fails. If it was optional, everything would have worked properly.                                                                               
    Kindly revise your field status customizing
    Kind Regards
    davide

  • COPA posting reversal

    We are using ECC6, new GL and COPA. SAP modules SD, MM, FI, CO.
    A complex posting has been made with a Sales Order automatically generating a Purchase Order which was GRNd and invoices issued. All of the postings were subsequently cancelled or reversed due to errors and omissions and a new sequence of postings made. This happened several times before the users thought they had got it right!
    The end result has been that the Revenue, as shown in the KE30 report, is now zero, but the COGS posting still remains.
    Can anyone suggest why the COGS posting would not have been reversed along with the finance postings and how we could resolve this?
    Thanks in advance

    Thanks, Abhisek
    the sequence of postings was very complex. let me post you the email I got from the Finance user:
    History of events leading up to this error.
    u2022     Sales order 979 created.
    u2022     And from that PO 4500000941 was raised. 3 lines !
    u2022     The PO was GRNu2019d
    u2022     I then matched (Vendor) invoice BAE1286 to the GRN
    u2022     Ian raised invoice 90001690 to WUK
    u2022     In the following month I received the duty and delivery charge invoice from (freight company), I realised then that the delivery cost generated was 4x the cost of the goods. To correct the problem we had to back out/reverse all the documents and Ian would re-price the delivery charges.
    u2022     Ian raised credit note 90001938 to cancel invoice 90001690
    u2022     And I reversed out the (Vendor) invoice
    u2022     Ian created 3 new lines on PO, now 4, 5 and 6
    u2022     I re-posted the test rite invoice and the (Freight) charges to the new lines
    u2022     I asked Ian to raise the new invoice in billings due list, however when Ian tried to find it in billings due it wasnu2019t there!
    u2022     So again I reversed the (Vendor) and (Freight) invoices from lines 4, 5 and  6. This left the Balance of the order at 0.00 !
    u2022     Ian raised another sales order and PO, SO 1723 and PO being 4500001625.
    u2022     I posted the (Vendor) invoice and (Freight) charges and from that Ian raised invoice 90001952
    At this point I thought that this was job done, however I checked the KE30 and discovered something wrong.
    Make sure you run ke30 for the full year to see the results
                   Rev          COGS          
    Sales doc 979            67K          61K          
    Crd 900000077          -67K          0          
    Sales doc 1723           67K          63K               (Reason the COGS is 2k
    higher is because of the
    addition (Freight) cost)
    Total               67K          124K
    As you can see the COGS is now double to the revenue!
    Now it thought that this could be 2 things, either when I did the reversal of the (Vendor) invoice it did not reverse the COGS in KE30, or when the credit note reversed it did not reverse the COGS in KE30 ?
    On PO 4500000941 invoice cancelled the posting and tried to raise another credit but this time a stock credit in the hope that it would reverse the COGS posting.  Credit note 90002063 was raised however it did not reverse the GOGS. And it has now left us in a worst state than before, please see below.
                   Rev          COGS          
    Sales doc 979            67K          61K          
    Crd 60000077          -67K          0          
    Crd 60000079          -67K          0
    Sales doc 1723           67K          63K     
    Total                0K          124K
    What I advised Ian to do is to cancel sales doc 60000079 (credit note 90002067) so we are back in this position, I had to do this as the sale ledger for (our operating concern) did not balance we had to 1 to may credits raised. (Operating Concern) account is now o.k and we are back in this position with the KE30
    Rev          COGS          
    Sales doc 979            67K          61K          
    Crd 900000077          -67K          0          
    Sales doc 1723           67K          63K               (Reason the COGS is 2k
    higher is because of the
    addition (Freight) cost)
    Total               67K          124K
    We have raised endless amounts of reversals, credits notes, new POu2019s that it is totally confusion in the document flow so I donu2019t want to go down the route of doing anymore however we need to fix the COGS ?
    A reason why the COGS never reversed is maybe because the original PO was cancelled (trash cans next to each line) before we raised the credits ?
    Is there away we can manually credit 67K in the COGS for Test rite ?
    I think you can see why I'm calling for help! Will KE21N allow them to make a posting that will create the credit they need?
    Thanks for your time.

  • Please help with Posting Keys For Fast Entry (t.code OBXJ)

    Dear experts,
    Please help me to be more familiar with configurtation of Enjoy Transactions (t.code OBXJ). I want to configure fast entry transaction and change standard assignement of posting key. But there are no editing options in this transaction, just three transaction keys are predefined and posting keys are assigned to them (those are changable). But where to see what those transaction keys mean? And what could be your proposals, how to configure this IMG step?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    t.code OBXJ is for automatccly postings, normal you never change the standard posting keys.
    In the block line items you can select colums you need and place the one's you need to the begin of the screen and in the right top corner of posting line items you can click an save this as (default) variant.
    When you want to use an other posting keys you use the option complex posting (F6)
    Paul

  • Response options for POST method in Restufl services?

    I am using the Restful services for the Oracle Cloud Database and I am trying to see what my options are for returning responses from my POST calls but haven't had any luck. It doesnt seem that using dbms_output.put_line() is respected for returning information in the body of the response and I havent had any luck with OUT parameters. Obviously GETs work fine returning the selected dataset, but I can't figure out what to do for POSTs. Can someone give me a quick simple, PL/SQL hello world example of returning data (body or header, either is fine) for the REST APIs?
    Edited by: 1003431 on Apr 30, 2013 3:56 PM

    user588066 wrote:
    Thank you for your response,
    I constructed HTML data in different ways, but in all cases I am getting 200(OK) response. But nothing is happening As I mentioned, you must not construct HTML for a POST.
    A POST consists of two basic parts. A header part. A data part.
    The POST that you need to create, should look something as follows:
    POST /servlet/servlet.WebToLead HTTP/1.1
    Host: www.salesforce.com
    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0
    Content-Length: <number>
    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    oid=00D400000008XSQ&first_name=Scott&last_name=Tiger&email=[email protected] header part contains the standard HTTP header information - such as the size, content type and so on.
    The data part contains what a query string for a GET command typically would contain. Name-value pairs, separated by the ampersand character, and control characters encoded where needed.
    I suggest that you use your favourite search engine and research the topic of what the content and structure is for a http POST - and once you understand that, put some PL/SQL code together to create such a structure. And make that simplistic first so it is easy to debug and test - before tackling a more complex POST using https in addition too.

  • Multiple vendor line items in MIR7

    Hi,
    Is there a way that I can post various vendor line items in MIR7 like the one in FB60 which is via complex posting?
    Thanks,
    Chaikaru

    >
    chaikaru wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Is there a way that I can post various vendor line items in MIR7 like the one in FB60 which is via complex posting?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Chaikaru
    Yes why not, if you are doing invoicing against multiple line items, you can assign each line to different vendor, to accomplish this, you need to click on DETAILS tab of invoice header and in INV.PARTY put in the vendor number and save.
    Same process you do with other line with different vendor number.
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jun 3, 2010 4:04 PM
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jun 3, 2010 4:04 PM

  • Interlaced frames after using Apple directions for Canon HV30 24p

    I have an Canon HV30 HDV video camera and clips that have been recorded using its 24p mode. I'm using the instruction Apple has given to remedy this type of footage in Compressor and output to Pro Res:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2410?viewlocale=en_US
    I've tried this method a couple of times and carefully also. Everything seems to work well other than the fact that I am getting interlaced frames on the last one or two frames of each clip. Sometimes it's the beginning of the clips. As they are supposed to, clips are changing to 24p and when I step through a clip frame by frame everything looks fine, except for those last couple frames. Other methods, like using JES Deinterlacer, do not produce these distorted interlaced frames. However I would prefer to use Compressor. Could it be that I changed some setting or preference in Compressor a while back that is affecting these clips right now?
    Please help!
    Once again, using Final Cut Studio 2 and a Canon HV30 with 24p clips.

    Hello,
    I experienced the same thing. But I feel that the first second or two of any clip is not useable, when
    editing I have never needed every last frame.
    This is not much of a help to you. I think it has to do with the mysteries of HDV, Long GOP, and 2 t0 3 pulldown and the complex post processing that must happen to yield 24 full frames.
    Good luck, Tom

  • How to make BSEG-DMBTR (amt in loc CoCode currency) Optional or mandatory?

    Hi,
    Normally, the field BSEG-DMBTR is hidden unless you put a value (other than that of the company code currency) in the field BKPF-WAERS  (Document Currency). However, for data conversion purposes, we are uploading an excel file with our open items & balances and wish to populate both BSEG-WRBTR (amount in transaction currency) and BSEG-DMBTR (amount in CoCode / local currency). The problem is that where BKPF-WAERS  = CoCode Currency, the BSEG-DMBTR is hidden.  It seems there's no way of making BSEG-DMBTR  optional / mandatory via the field status of either the g/l account or the posting keys..........
    Any ideas on this, or experiences you've had regarding uploading values to BSEG-DMBTR  and BSEG-WRBTR wold be appreciated. For example, if the document currency = CoCode currency, have you just uploaded the value into BSEG-WRBTR?  The reason we are trying to upload both BSEG-WRBTR  and BSEG-DMBTR is because in our excel file, it makes reconciliation easier if we have the BSEG-DMBTR for all documents (inclulding those where the transaction currency = CoCode Currency). 
    Regards, Garoid.

    when you enter the doc currency as local currency - system will ask only doc currency which will be updated in local currency field automatically- no customising required.
    When you enter the doc cur as a different currency than local currency, you have option to enter
    a. exchange rate
    b. enter doc currency and local currency - where rate will be updated automatically by conversion the actual values written.
    When you manually update the Revaluation entries - system will not allow you to enter doc currency - it will ask only local currency. or additional currency as the case may be (if you maintain more parallel currencies.
    SAP program takes care of the subsequent screens fields on the basis first screen entry made- This will be clearly visible when you use Complex posting TCodes like FB01, F-02, etc. This may not be visible in Enjoy SAP screens as the fields are controlled through variants activated - but internal controls stands same.
    Hope it is clear.

Maybe you are looking for