FX Spot Valuation

Hi Experts,
I need to valuate a fx spot transaction with M (Standard translation at average rate). The configuration that I have for key date valuation for product type (60A) is as follows:
Define Price Valuation Procedure for Forward Exchange Transactions
1000 (Rate Valuation Spot/Spot)
NPV Type: 002
Write Up Rule: Write up to Market Value
Write Down Rule: Write Down to Market Value
Rate Type Spot Pur.:       M
Rate Type Spot Sale       M
Rate Type Swap Purch  M
Rate Type Swap Sale    M
For Define Position Management Procedure:
Position Management Category: Forex Transactions
Transfer Cat: Only Post to Used Components
Type of Step: 6
Procedure: 1000
Flag "Carry Out for Key Date Valuation"
In Assign Update Types for Valuation:
Tab "One Step: Overall write-down"
- Adjustment Write-Down, Forex  V102
- Forex Write-Down V103
Tab "One Step: Overall write-up"
- Forex Write-Up V152
- Adjust Forex Write-Up V153
Tab "Foreign crcy valuation"
- Forex Write-Up V202
- Forex Write-Down V203
- Write-Up for Costs, Forex 206
- Write-Down for Costs, Forex V207
- Variation Margin Forex Write-Up V210
- Variation Margin Forex Write-Down V211
- Clear Forex Write-Up V252
- Clear Forex Write-Down V253
- Clear Write-Up for Costs, Forex V256
- Clear Write-Down for Costs, Forex V257
All update types flagged as relavant for posting.
when buying/selling a currency the system is configured to post the transaction the following way:
Example:
TX01 / TX-5 / TBB1
Im buying 1.000.000 EUR @ 1.5 USD
40 - EUR Bank: 1.000.000 EUR
50 - Clearing Account: 1.000.000 EUR
40 - Clearing Account: 1.600.000 USD
50 - USD Bank: 1.600.000 USD
If Exchange Rate Type "M" for EUR is 1.6 I need to post a profit for the difference between (1.6 - 1.5)* 1.000.000= 100.000
But when valuating with TPM1 nothing happens, and no message is displayed.
Thanks for the help in advance!
Best Regards,
Santiago

Hi Manish, regarding the Derived Business Transactions configuration is as follows:
In Assign Update Types for Derived Business Transactions, selection the correspondant Pos Management Procedure.
Under Dialog Structure "Rate Gains/Losses":
                                      Unsched.            Sched Outflows
Exchange Rate Gain    DBT_B005           DBT_B006
Exchange Rate Loss   DBT_B007           DBT_B008
Rate Gain (Standard)  DBT_B013
Rate Loss (Standard) DBT_B014
or should I configure valuation??
FX Write-Up of Amort. Acqu. Value ???? (what update type)
FX Write-Down of Amort. Acqu. Value ???? (what update type)
Control of Processing of Derived Business Transactions
Acct Code XXXX / Offline / Same Status / 04 (Other Reasons)
All update type marked relevant for posting.
Need anything else?
When executing TPM27
ACC      /        VA    /        TRL Date   /   BT Cat  / Name of business transaction category / Der BT´s
1002     001          11.01.2010     4000     Open OTC transaction     
1002     001          11.01.2010     4001     Close OTC transaction     
1002     001          11.01.2010     4002     Purchase OTC transaction     
1002     001           11.01.2010     4003     Sell OTC transaction     
Then in the TPM18
with TRL Date: 11/01/2010
and the following message appears: "No Scheduled derived business transactions were found for the selection"
Thanks in advence for the help

Similar Messages

  • Valuation price with user exit/BADI/Enhancement Spot (In valuation variant)

    Hi all,
    i am facing problem finding enhancement when creation of sales order of Valuation price with user exit/BADI/Enhancement Spot  (In valuation variant)
    For refferenece:
    When going to t.code VA03, select one item and go to extras in the menu bar and select costing then you find some amounts calculation i.e valuation price automatically.
    So when creation of sales order i am giving material and that material price automatically takes from material master and creating sales order.
    My customer requirement is to get the valuation price of the input material from Z-table during the sales order cost estimate.
    This Z-table contains the material code, plant , grade  of the material.
    Ex:
    Material         Plant   Grade Price
    A                1000    XYZ     25000
    A                1000    PQR     35000
    A                1000    BCD     45000
    Suppose it depends on sales document type and which grade price i have to take.
    So first of all i am unable to find enhancement where to change this code to get change the valuation price.
    Does anybody have any idea , is there any user exit/BADI/enhancement for this.
    So please help me in this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    lokeshgoud

    pls allow me to post the questions

  • Balance Sheet translation at spot rate at ANY point in time

    My client produces its financial accounts in AUD.  They will have open items in AR, AP and Bank in foreign currencies.  WITHOUT running periodic valuation they wish to produce a Balance Sheet at any point in time during the month applying the applicable daily spot rate to valuate the Foreign Currency open items (for reporting purposes only).  I have run S_ALR_87012284 and maintained the special evaluations tab for Display Currency (AUD), Key date for translation (current date) and exchange rate type (spot rate type).  However, this does not appear to be revaluating the open items in the subledger accounts to produce the balance sheet at the current spot rate.  Appreciate input / alternate approach.  Cheers, Dean.

    Hi Chirag
    As per Oracle following are the rules that has to be followed for translation.
    1. For Balance Sheet Accounts (Asset & Liabilities) GL as a default uses the YTD rule.
    2. For P&L Accounts you can choose between YTD and PTD rule. So in your case you can use the default PTD Rule. (Profile Option 'GL Translation: Revenue/Expense Translation Rule')
    YTD Rule = (Translated Period Amount = Period-End Rate x YTD Ledger Currency Balance - Beginning Translated Balance).
    PTD Rule = (Translated Period Amount = Period Average Rate x PTD Ledger Currency Balance)
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Gautam
    Edited by: Gahlout on Sep 25, 2012 11:04 PM

  • Foreign currency valuation for GR/IR clearing account is repeatedly posting

    While executing foreign currency valuation (program SAPF100) through T code F.05 the following fields are selected for the spotted rate valuation for currency type 10.
    A)     Valuate G/L account open items
    B)     Evaluate  GR/IR account (GR/IR clearing account is selected)
    C)     Valuate customer open items  
    After execution the valuation postings are repeated  in GR/IR FC valuation Balance sheet adj account while the postings in other accounts occur only once.
    GR/IR FC valuation Balance sheet adjustment account is configured in OB09 for GR/IR account for respective currency type and local currency.
    What could be the reason for repeated postings in FC valuation account?

    I think there is some issue with the process, normally vendor/customer reconciliation account or some liability assets related account which has impact due to foreign currency rate changes needs to be revaluated. I don't understand why you have set up foreign currency valuation for GR/IR account, these are intermediatory account which reflects in system between for example GR and IR.
    I also think that you need more information on foreign currency valuation, basically it happens on a particular key date and gets reversed on key date + 1, because revaluation is only required on a key date for reporting purposes. on the next day it get reversed and actual loss or profit on foreign currency only gets booked on realization.
    Hope this helps!!!
    Murlidhar Khatri

  • Valuation Procedure to calculate Fair Market Value

    Hi Treasury Experts,
    In the Treasury Hedge Management component we are looking for a valuation procedure which can handle the calculation of the Fair Market Value of the financial transactions in line with the standard FAS133 accounting standard.
    We have financial contracts that run over several months. From the contract start date to contract valuation date we need to value based on comparing the spot rate of the transaction against the close rate applicable at valuation date. We can use the Price Valuation Procedure for Forward Exchange Transaction with step 3000 (Rate Valuation Spot/Spot Hedge Accounting) to calculate this piece of the Fair Value.
    We also need to include in the calculation of the Fair Value a component from the valuation date to the contract maturity date. This piece of the valuation is based on an interpolation of the interest rates over the remaining days of the contract (from valuation date to maturity date).
    Can you advise if there is a valuation step or perhaps number of valuation steps that can be used to calculate the Fair Value of a financial contract in line with this requirement? That is to value the contract from inception date to valuation date based on comparing the PV at spot versus the PV at close rate and then to value the contract from valuation date to contract maturity date based on the PV by the interpolated interest rates over the remaining days of the contract?
    Thanks for your advice.
    Mik

    See what other similar ones are selling for:
    http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=2011+macbook+-pro&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trks id=p2045573.m570.l1313&_nkw=2011+macbook+-pro+-air&_sacat=0

  • Valuation of foreign exchange forward with NPV split for interest vs FX impact?

    Hello,
    I have the following business requirement regarding the accounting treatment of the valuation of a foreign exchange forward deal :
    1. during the lifetime of the deal
    step1. valuation
              the deal should valued at its NPV using the swap points curve (table AT15) => that gives the "VALUE"
         BUT
    step 2. the posting of the deal's value should be SPLIT into TWO components
                   a) component 1 = linearly amortized swap points since deal date +2   until valuation date     => to be classified to interest result
                   b) component 2 =  VALUE - component 1                                                                                => to be classified to unrealized fx result
    Comment.
    So, in fact it is some hybrid combination of the two SAP standard valuation methods
                   a) spot/spot + swap accrual + swap valuation (but NO NPV calculation) 
                   b) NPV calculation (without any split in components)
    2. at maturity
         realized fx result :     calculation based on deal spot rate versus spot rate at maturity
         interest result :          calculation based on deal spot rate vs deal forward rate
    Don't see how this "mixted behavior" can be achieved by customizing the valuation process.
    Please help.
    Best regards,
    Carl

    Hi Carl,
    In order to use the 2step valuation during the lifetime of forex contracts, you need to combine 2 valuation steps in your Position Management Procedure:
    1. step 6 Rate valuation for forward exchange transactions: spot-spot
    2. step 4 Security valuation
    Additonally, if the NPV should be calculated based on swap points from AT15, you need to apply BAdI JBA_SFGDT that is able to adjust TPM60 or/and reports in MRA if needed. See SAP note 0000940562 for details (and also 1941874 for extrapolation issues).
    As far as i know, at maturity you can only have 1flow of gain/loss by using standard SAP Solution.
    Best regards,
    Piotr

  • Operative valuation for FX/MM in ECC6.0

    hi experts,
    could any provide a short list of config steps to setup account determination for FX spot/forward and MM time deposit? I am implementing this project in an IDES ECC6.0 server and was surprised to learn that the old operative valuation process is now obsolete.
    any help will be greatly appreciated!!

    Hi Kumar,
    I booked an FX deal with PType 60A and TTyp 100 and was able to successfully release the flows. But keep getting error during TBB1 posting flows. I believe there is a functionality in ECC6.0/CFM2.0 that requires definition of valuation areas and TRL initialization so i tried setting this up too. I did not have to do this in my previous implementations..
    Customization  ---
    1 - Checked if standard valuation areas are defined
    001: IFRS
    002: Operational
    003: US-GAAP
    2 - Defined Accounting Code for my company code "cocode"
    3 - Assigned my acctg code to valuation areas
    cocode:
    001 - IFRS
    002 - Operational
    4 - Also defined relationship between acct code and valuation area in "Product groups/categories/types to be excluded" but did not tick exclusion
    Doing so fixed the first error I received from TBB1, but was giving me a new error "TRL initialization for forex, money market, derivatives, co code 'cocode' is not yet complete"
    So, after quite a while of research i found TPM_INITIALIZE (initialize parallel valuation areas). I wasn't sure what to do here so i just selected the product group for OTC transactions and executed fast entry using a previous key date (01.01.2004). I think this fixed the 2nd problem, but now my TBB1 gives a generic issue "No information was found". There is no error log so I don't know how to troubleshoot this.
    Would you inform me if the whole setup above is actually needed to run TBB1? Also, if there are any configurations required to run this transaction?
    hope that you can help me. thank you very much!
    regards,
    David

  • Error in Valuated Stock during MFBF

    Dear All,
    During my confirmation in REM Back flushing(GR Posting) using MFBF , Movement type 131, There was an error message stating that
    M7 314 "Valuated Stock becomes Negative:*_> see long text...
    As per the systems' performance assistant I have cross checked the Material Master Accounting View , Costing View for the material stock quantity and the standard price.. It was available for the current period also.
    The stock updated in the material master was cross checked with MMBE - found correct
    The stock was checked at the table level in both MBEW and MARD - also found correct and the same result was displayed
    Also cross checked in the MB51 - Materail Document list for the material stock and the value of the stock  & cross checked with MB52 also.
    Am unable to spot the error... please help me out.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

    Mahesh,
    The problem is with one of the components, not the parent.  Check the unrestricted stock levels existing for all components, compared to the amount you wish to backflush (PGI) to the order.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Assign update types  to Posting Specification  under valuation area

    Hi  Friends,
    Under  account determiination  ,  in  Dialog structure ( left side),   there  are   two   area   for   '  ASSIGN UPDATE TYPES TO POSTING SPEC ' .      I  had   to  make   assignment  in  both  the  area   for   spot   transactions   FX  for   posting spec   11100 &  11200   and  update  types FX1000+  and  FX2000-.
       But   the   one   grouped  under   'Valuation  area'  is   not   required  I  think.   Pl  let me know  if   i  have  missed  some settings. that   the  system  is  asking me  to   do   assignment  in  BOTH  places.
    Thanks
    kamala

    Hi,
    Normally, we customize system with single valuation area (Operative) only. You need to complete customization in Valuation area category if you are maintaining multiple valuation area under single legal entity. In case of multiple valuation area settings, it is better to give account determination setting too seperately for all VA. Generally, parallel valuation may have very few accounting like MTM valuation etc, else all update type with parallel valuation can be marked "Not relevant for positng"
    Regards
    Prasad AV

  • Plant-Split Valuation Table

    Hi
    I have been trying to spot a table or view which gives me the information, if a plant has split valuation activated or not.  So, please suggest me any table available for information regarding to split valuation for a plant. I already looked into MBEW and TCURM tables.
    Vishwa.

    Hello,
    To Activate Split valuation run TCode : OMW0
    For more refer : [SAP Split Valuation for Materials|http://www.sap-img.com/mm025.htm]
    Cheers,
    Remi

  • IFRS / FASB 52 - VALUATION

    Dear SAPians,
    FAS 52 Compliance:
    1. All the monetary items needs to be valuated on the spot rate.
    This means Spot rate on the date of transaction occurrence with that of the spot rate on the month end.
    2. WIP,CTC, etc.. should be valued on the Spot rate only.
    means result analysis output should be based on the Spot rate on the date of transaction occurrence.
    Plz find the specific questions,
    Solution in case of
    1. In cases of the Projects
    2. Incase of Products (MTO and MTS scenario).
    With respect to the different RA scenarios of
    A. CCM method.
    B. Revenue based POC method.
    C. Cost based POC method.
    So, now the consultants should provide the solution in a way
    1. At what rates the Planning will happen - At hedged rates or At Average'M' rates.
    2. At what rates the Actual values are captured - At hedged rates or At Average rates
    3. How the Result analysis is being carried out whether at hedged figures or at average figures
    Thanks & Regards
    M N Gurram

    Dear N M,
    The solution of how FASB52 is applied to the income statement seems not to be covered neither by the literature nor the SAP world... at least this is my knowledge.
    As for the cost to cost POC method the riddle is how to solve the preferred view of a controller (having the sales order under control) and the correct accounting treatment of FASB52, i.e. post the revenue and costs at daily rates.
    I actually see two possibilities (cost side of POC orders):
    a) you post all the costs in a POC cost to cost order at daily rates and adjust the plan value accordingly to avoid any impact on the POC revenue calculated (also to avoid, that you will have more revenue than actually planned)
    b) you only post at hedged rates into the POC cost to cost order and solve the impact to the income statement with an add-on report checking for all  cost postings to the IS in fx. Subsequently you would revalue those postings at daily rates
    Unfortunately I am not aware of any SAP standard to apply FASB52 to the income statement. SAP just concentrates on the revaluation of balance sheet items, which is actually the very simple part of the challenge.
    For the revenue of POC cost to cost orders denominated in FX you have again the two options mentioned above
    a) you post the calculated revenue by using the spot rate rather than the hedge rate (problem: PS and SD are only in home currency displayed...) and tell your SAP system to automatically adjust the plan value of the revenue accordingly to avoid revenue overrun of actual versus plan. Unfortunately this has an unfavourable impact on your margin in the order...
    b) You check again the postings in the IS and calculate the corrections
    Knowing the issue for more than 10 years I am still looking for a good practical solution. Any ideas from your side?
    regards
    DAEMLO

  • Compute Unrealized Gain/Loss and Provisions for Valuated Forex Contract

    Hi Everyone,
    Can anyone tell me how unrealized gain/loss or provisions were computed for forex contract?
    I created a spot/forward transaction with the following details:
    Product Type: 60A
    Transaction Type: 102
    Buy Currency: USD
    Sell Currency: NZD
    Local Currency: SGD
    Forward Rate: 0.6864
    Spot Rate: 0.7045
    Swap Rate: 0.199-
    I used midyear valuation w/ reset as a valuation category when I execute valuation in TPM1.
    Your response would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.
    Canto

    Hi  Murlidhar,
    Thank you for the response.  Yes, I understand that a gain/loss can be realized based on exchange rate differences between when invoice entered/posted and when paid.  That's only part of the gain/loss in minds of the accountants.  The other part is gain/loss from time that cash was put into bank account.  For example, we spend $100 USD to purchase and deposit R$167 BRL into Brazil bank account.  Three months later that same R$167 BRL is worth only $85 USD.  At that time we post and pay Brazil invoice on same day in amount of R$167 with no exchange gain/loss on the invoice.  System posts credits of R$167 BRL and $85 USD to bank account G/L account.  System does not record gain/loss on payment because invoice currency translation date and paid date are same.  However, the bank account G/L account balance now reflects R$0 BRL and $15 USD on which system calculates a $15 USD unrealized gain/loss at month end.  This unrealized gain/loss on the bank G/L account posts and reverses each month just as you said but never goes away.  In minds of accountants the $15 USD gain/loss should be recognized.  How best to recognize the $15 USD gain/loss, that is the question.
    Thanks
    Steve

  • PMP 4000 calcualtes Spot/Spot and SWAP/SWAP Difference while

    Hi,
    My client is using Position Management Procedure 4000 for our Forex Forward
    transactions (Product type 60A and Transaction type 102).
    When we do key date valuation using TPM1 it calculates two different
    valautions - one for Spot gain/loss and another for Swap gain/loss as
    shown in the enclosed screen shot.
    We want a single gain/loss amount to be posted to the unrealized
    gain/loss account.
    What do we do?
    Kalyan

    Hi,
    In the IMG activity, Transaction manager --  Accounting -- Key date Valuation -- Assign Update Types
    define only the required update types for PMP 4000.   Also, in your PMP, I think you are using rate valuation for forward exchange transaction step. 
    Anyway, in the case of forward exchange transactions, I think it is correct to post both the losses because the rate of the transaction is made up of spot and swap rate.
    If you want to use a single account, then specify the same posting specifications for both the update types.  It will post to the same G/L accounts.  Please attach the screen shots..
    Check this case also: In settings for position management  --  Key date Valuation -- Price Valuation procedure for forward exchange transactions.
    Here in your procedure do not use Market Forward Rate for forward rate in transaction.  Only this component uses swap rate.
    Use Market spot rate for forward rate.  This will compare only with market spot rate on valuation date and post only 1 loss. 
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Edited by: Ravishankar Ramamurthy on Aug 3, 2009 10:09 AM

  • How can I use the old Apple TV with new iTunes?  It tells me to input a code in iTunes but iTunes no longer has a spot to input this code to allow sync.  I can access the iTunes Store fine, just none of my Library

    How can I use the old Apple TV with new iTunes?  It tells me to input a code in iTunes but iTunes no longer has a spot to input this code to allow sync.  I can access the iTunes Store fine, just none of my Library

    read this
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/20429789#20429789

  • When I share a pages document as a PDF (via e-mail) all the pictures change from the original document, most are missing with just a few of them repeated in the spots where others had been.  How do I do this without the document changing?

    When I share a pages document as a PDF (via e-mail) all the pictures change from the original document, most are missing with just a few of them repeated in the spots where others had been.  How do I do this without the document changing?
    I need to be able to send it to a PC in order to print it.

    Hard to say what is happening without examining the file.
    If you like click on my blue name and email me both the .pages file and the the .pdf you have made from it.
    Peter
    ps It would help to say what version of Pages you are using and on what you are running it. iOS or Mac and what version.

Maybe you are looking for