General Question: should Fact Table use virtual column?

Hi,
I have read several articles about 11g's Virtual Column feature and it all looks very good. But I just want to know
- Whether virtual column is also good for Fact table or not?
- Is it recommedated?
- Is there a 'limit' or 'recommedation'regarding how many virtual columns I should use in a table?
Thanks

In an OLTP system, the number of virtual columns is self-limiting because there aren't that many simple ways to combine the columns in a single table using simple expressions. In a data warehouse, there are likely a lot more expressions that you might want to compute, so you would have to be careful as oracletune points out if expressions can change over time assuming that you want the version of the computation that was in force at the time the row was written to be used.
There really isn't a rule of thumb. It's a lot like asking how many indexes a table should have-- the only answer is to do a cost-benefit analysis on each potential index/ virtual column to determine if the benefits outweigh the cost. A virtual column allows you to avoid computing an expression when you are inserting a value but requires that you compute it at query time. If a row is queried millions of times, written once, and never updated, that probably isn't a great trade-off. If a row is queried a few times and updated a bunch, avoiding the computations is probably worthwhile. If you need to store the value and you have an OLTP system, the ability to ensure that you never have stale computations is great.
Justin

Similar Messages

Multiple fact tables using one measure

Hi Experts,
Multiple fact tables using single measure .For example Measure name is amount . This measure is using 5 fact tables. By using this info , i have to create bmm layer document . In bmm layer documents columns are like logical table name ,column name, logical sourc name . could you please help me out to draft the document ?

Hi ,
My question is five fact tables are there, day level two different fact tables , period and week fact tables are there .
Above all tables are using single measure . how to design these fact tables with measure in bmm layer ?
Please kindly give reply .
Thanks in advance.

Fact table have tow column reference the same dim table

In my analytic domain, my fact table have tow column reference the same dim table, but in physical diagram, between two table ,can only have one join, so i create a copy of the dim table, then finish the join in physical. This method can resolve this question, but not so good, Anyone have perfect solution?

user4497169 wrote:
Thanks,
yours method is very very good, I don't know this method before. Where do you get this imfomation?The sample sales RPD has (good) modelling references you can refer to, otherwise think about how you'd write the SQL Statement yourself, you'd need to use an alias to access the same table on seperate joins.

ORA-00939 when creating XML table with Virtual Columns

Getting error on creating table with VIRTUAL COLUMNS:
Error at Command Line:4 Column:31
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00939: too many arguments for function
00939. 00000 - "too many arguments for function"
Without VIRTUAL COLUMNS works fine.
Where to start?
Is it possible to add Virtual Columns after a table is created?
CREATE TABLE TDS_XML OF XMLType
XMLSCHEMA "http://xmlns.abc.com/tds/TDSSchemaGen2.xsd"
ELEMENT "TDSTestData"
VIRTUAL COLUMNS
TESTID AS (
    XMLCast(
              XMLQuery('declare default element namespace "http://xmlns.abc.com/tds/TDSSchemaGen2.xsd"; /TDSTestData/TestID' PASSING OBJECT_VALUE RETURNING CONTENT) AS VARCHAR2(32)
   )SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.2.0 Production on Mon Apr 30 20:17:29 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
SQL>

victor_shostak wrote:
Figured, Virtual Columns work only for Binary XML.They are only supported, currently, for Binary XML.

ORA-00904 on CREATE TABLE with virtual column based on XMLTYPE content

Hello,
this is another one for the syntax gurus...
Trying the following, fails with ORA-00904: "MESSAGE"."GETROOTELEMENT": invalid identifier
CREATE TABLE XML_TEST_VIRT
   MSG_TYPE         GENERATED ALWAYS AS (MESSAGE.GETROOTELEMENT()) VIRTUAL,
   MESSAGE XMLTYPE             NOT     NULL,
   IE906    XMLTYPE             DEFAULT NULL
   XMLTYPE COLUMN MESSAGE STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
   XMLTYPE COLUMN IE906   STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
/while this one succeeds
CREATE TABLE XML_TEST_VIRT
   MSG_TYPE         GENERATED ALWAYS AS (EXTRACT(MESSAGE, '/*').GETROOTELEMENT()) VIRTUAL,
   MESSAGE XMLTYPE             NOT     NULL,
   IE906    XMLTYPE             DEFAULT NULL
   XMLTYPE COLUMN MESSAGE STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
   XMLTYPE COLUMN IE906   STORE AS SECUREFILE BINARY XML
/The GETROOTELEMENT member function of SYS.XMLTYPE is declared as "DETERMINISTIC PARALLEL_ENABLE" so the method getting called is not the problem as the 2nd case proves.
Using the column MESSAGE which is of type XMLTYPE directly seems to be the problem. But the question is "why". The EXTRACT function result is of type XMLTYPE and calling its member works, the column is also of type XMLTYPE yet calling its member fails...
Thanks in advance for any insights on this.
Best Regards
Philip

Hmmmm ... I don't know if I should smile or frown with the implication that I am an OO guy :D :D
Most of my colleagues when I started working as a software engineer, treated me as too low-level because of my C background (started doing C in 1985).
In my last job, my colleagues hated my guts because I was asking them to squeeze every bit of performance out of C++ by using STL which is definitely not OO (although C++ is).
My current colleagues treat me as a DB guru (which I most definitely am not) and they overlook/forget the fact that most of them use Java libraries in their projects, that I wrote for them !
I am inclined to believe that I do not fall into any category in the end...
The only thing I am for sure - and I am proud of it - is inquisitive. I want to know everything there is about the tools I use, and so I end up spending hours and hours investigating... (Microsoft found that out the hard way when I filed 16 bug reports in 8 days when Visual C++ 6 came out ! Not that it hurt them though...)
This is where my confession ends (and my working on the XML validator starts...)
Καληνύχτα Marco
Philip (Φίλιππος in Greek)
PS: I did not follow the last solution anyway. I just wanted to verify its operability ;)

ORA-31061 error while creating XMLType table with virtual column

I'm not calling it frustration ;)
but still... what about this one :
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Express Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.2.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
SQL> create table test_virtual of xmltype
2 xmltype store as binary xml
3 virtual columns (
4    doc_id as (
5      xmlcast(
6        xmlquery('/root/@id'
7        passing object_value returning content)
8        as number
9      )
10    )
11 )
12 ;
Table created.Now, on the latest version :
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL> create table test_virtual of xmltype
2 xmltype store as binary xml
3 virtual columns (
4    doc_id as (
5      xmlcast(
6        xmlquery('/root/@id'
7        passing object_value returning content)
8        as number
9      )
10    )
11 )
12 ;
      passing object_value returning content)
ERROR at line 7:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-31061: XDB error: dbms_xdbutil_int.get_tablespace_tab
ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XDBUTIL_INT", line 1002Is there something I should be aware of?
Right now, I'm just evaluating the version so I can't submit any SR.
Thanks for anyone trying to reproduce the issue.

Just tested again on a new installation (64-bit server).
It works :
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE     11.2.0.3.0     Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> create table test_virtual of xmltype
2 xmltype store as binary xml
3 virtual columns (
4    doc_id as (
5      xmlcast(
6        xmlquery('/root/@id'
7                 passing object_value returning content)
8        as number
9      )
10    )
11 );
Table created
Now I'll try to see what are the differences between the two installations.
Thanks Dan and Marco for looking into this.
Edited by: odie_63 on 2 mai 2012 15:51

Insertion in Table with Virtual Column

Hi,
I am using 11.1.0.7.0 on Solaris 10.
I created following table:
test@mytest> create table mytest (c1 number, c2 number generated always as (1) virtual);
Table created.
test@mytest> create unique index idx on mytest(c2);
Index created.
test@mytest> insert into mytest values(1);
insert into mytest values(1)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00947: not enough values
test@mytest> Why it is not letting me insert into the table, because we cannot insert value in a virtual column?
regards
Edited by: Panicked DBA on Aug 28, 2010 3:59 AM

This works a little bit better but not really as expected:
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> drop table mytest purge;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> create table mytest (c1 number, c2 number generated always as (1) virtual);
Table created.
SQL> create unique index idx on mytest(c2);
Index created.
SQL> insert into mytest(c1) values(1);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> set null IS_NULL
SQL> select c1, c2 from mytest ;
        C1         C2
         1It looks like there is a bug if you specify C2 NUMBER data type:
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> drop table mytestok purge;
Table dropped.
SQL> drop table mytestko purge;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> create table mytestok (c1 number, c2 generated always as (1) virtual);
Table created.
SQL> insert into mytestok(c1) values(1);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select c1, c2 from mytestok ;
        C1         C2
         1          1
SQL> select * from mytestok where c2 = 1;
        C1         C2
         1          1
SQL>
SQL> create table mytestko (c1 number, c2 number generated always as (1) virtual);
Table created.
SQL> insert into mytestko(c1) values(1);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> set null IS_NULL
SQL> select c1, c2 from mytestko ;
        C1         C2
         1
SQL> select * from mytestko where c2 = 1;
no rows selected
SQL> exit

PL/SQL- Problem in creating a partitioned fact table using select as syntax

Hi All,
I am trying to create a clone(mdccma.fact_pax_bkng_t) of existing fact table (mdccma.fact_pax_bkng) using dynamic pl/sql. However, pl/sql anonymous block errors out with following error:
SQL> Connected.
SQL> SQL> DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00911: invalid character
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_SQL", line 1608
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 33
ORA-06512: at line 50
Here is pl/sql block:
-- CREATING FPB_T
DECLARE
v_owner VARCHAR2(32) := 'MDCCMA';
v_table_original VARCHAR2(32) := 'FACT_PAX_BKNG';
v_table VARCHAR2(32) := 'FACT_PAX_BKNG_T';
v_tblspc VARCHAR2(32) := v_owner||'_DATA';
CURSOR c_parts IS SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME, PARTITION_NAME,HIGH_VALUE, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY PARTITION_NAME) AS ROWNUMBER
FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = v_table_original
ORDER BY PARTITION_NAME;
v_cmd CLOB := EMPTY_CLOB();
v_cmd3 varchar2(300) := 'CREATE TABLE ' ||v_owner||'.'||v_table||' TABLESPACE '||v_tblspc
||' NOLOGGING PARTITION BY RANGE'||'(' ||'SNAPSHOT_DTM '||')' ||'(';
v_part VARCHAR2(32);
v_tblspc_name VARCHAR2(32);
v_row number;
v_value LONG;
v_tmp varchar2(20000);
v_cur INTEGER;
v_ret NUMBER;
v_sql DBMS_SQL.VARCHAR2S;
v_upperbound NUMBER;
BEGIN
v_cmd := v_cmd3;
OPEN c_parts;
FETCH c_parts INTO v_tblspc_name, v_part,v_value, v_row;
WHILE c_parts%FOUND
LOOP
IF (v_row = 1) THEN
v_tmp := ' PARTITION '||v_part||' VALUES LESS THAN ' ||'('|| v_value||')'||' NOLOGGING TABLESPACE '||v_tblspc_name;
ELSE
v_tmp := ', PARTITION '||v_part||' VALUES LESS THAN ' ||'('|| v_value||')'||' NOLOGGING TABLESPACE '||v_tblspc_name;
END IF;
v_cmd := v_cmd || v_tmp;
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(v_cmd);
FETCH c_parts INTO v_tblspc_name, v_part,v_value, v_row;
END LOOP;
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Length:'||DBMS_LOB.GETLENGTH(v_cmd));
v_cmd := v_cmd||')'||' AS SELECT ' || '*'||' FROM ' || v_owner||'.'|| v_table_original ||' WHERE '||'1'||'='||'2'||';';
v_upperbound := CEIL(DBMS_LOB.GETLENGTH(v_cmd)/256);
FOR i IN 1..v_upperbound
LOOP
v_sql(i) := DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR(v_cmd
,256 -- amount
,((i-1)*256)+1 -- offset
END LOOP;
v_cur := DBMS_SQL.OPEN_CURSOR;
DBMS_SQL.PARSE(v_cur, v_sql, 1, v_upperbound, FALSE, DBMS_SQL.NATIVE);
v_ret := DBMS_SQL.EXECUTE(v_cur);
CLOSE c_parts;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(v_cmd);
-- EXECUTE IMMEDIATE v_cmd ;
END;
The above pl/sql creates a DDL for partitioned fact table(new) based on an existing fact table and get executes through CLOB.
Please look into the issue and let me know any changes or modifications/suggestions that are required to fix the issue. Any help is appreciated.
Thank You,
Sudheer

Think this is your problem:
v_cmd := v_cmd||')'||' AS SELECT ' || '*'||' FROM ' || v_owner||'.'|| v_table_original ||' WHERE '||'1'||'='||'2'||';';Remove the SQL terminator ';' ... dynamic SQL doesn't require it, try this instead:
v_cmd := v_cmd||')'||' AS SELECT ' || '*'||' FROM ' || v_owner||'.'|| v_table_original ||' WHERE '||'1'||'='||'2';Thanks
Paul

Dropping a column in composite xmltype table with virtual column

Hello,
i found some interesting behavior. I have a table with xmltype column and a virtual column. If i drop a column, which has an index smaller than the index for the xmltype column, than the virtual column reference for xmltype column is not changed.
select * from v$version;
drop table t_xml purge;
create table t_xml( c1 number,
                    c2 number,
                    cxml xmltype,
                    c3 number,
                    xmlflag number as (nvl2(cxml,1,0)));
select * from t_xml;
alter table t_xml drop column c2;
select * from t_xml; The 2nd select will result in error:
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL> alter table t_xml drop column c2;
Tabelle wurde geändert.
SQL>
SQL> select * from t_xml;
select * from t_xml
FEHLER in Zeile 1:
ORA-00904: "SYS_NC00004$": ungültiger BezeichnerNow the virtual column xmlflag references still the old hidden column for cxml (SYS_NC00004$). It not references the new hidden column, which is now SYS_NC00003$.
I think, it is a bug! Can someone inform oracle? I have no access to metalink.

Hi,
Please try this code:
loop at int_inv into wa_inv.
    lv_count = lv_count + 1.
    AT END OF posnr.   <------- The field you want to sum..
      gs_total-posnr      = wa_inv-posnr.
      gs_total-cov_total = lv_count.
      APPEND gs_total TO gt_total.
      CLEAR : gs_total,
              lv_count,
              wa_inv.
    ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.

How to truncate fact tables using wb_truncate_table

Hi,
I've got a sequence of mappings that load various staging tables, dimensions and fact tables.
At present, I truncate the fact tables manually before loading the dimensions (to avoid foreigh key errors), but would like to write mappings to do the truncations.
I tried creating mappings using wb_truncate_table in a Pre-Mapping Process operator (using a constant for the filename), but can't figure out how to get this to actually truncate the fact table.
The manual says to "connect the output attribute of the Pre-Mapping Process operator to the input group of a target operator." However the PMP operator in my mapping doesn't have an output operator (and the add button is greyed out).
Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but can anybody help, or advise on a better way to truncate my fact tables before reloading the dimensions?
Thanks in advance.
Chris

got that to work using WB_TRUNCATE_TABLE in a PMP in the first mapping to >populate one of the fact table's dimensions. The problem I was having was in >trying to create a mapping just to do the truncate, but I see now that's not the >way to go.If you want to create a mapping that just truncate some table(s) - it's very easy.
1. Just create your own function that returns, let's say, char. Inside this function, call WB_TRUNCATE_TABLE and return dummy char (e.g. '1'). Then create some dummy table with only one colum of char type.
2. Create mapping. place constant operator, your function as transformation operator, and dummy table. Link them CONSTANT - TRANSFORMATION - TABLE.
That's all. If you want to truncate more tables within one mapping, just add more FUNCTIONS and add more attributes (table names) to the constant operator.

Delete only the Fact table using process chain?

Hi Experts,
I have an issue,where i have to delete the contents of the Infocube.So when i drag the Process type "Delete Contents of the Data target" into the process chain.I Am able to delete the contents of the cube.
But in my case i need to delete only the FACT table and not the DIMENSION table.The system does prompt a message to delete FACT only /FACT & DIM TAbles.
Please advice if its possible to Delete the FACT table only using process chains
thanks in advance

Hi ,
check this link ..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm
Regards,
Shikha

Problem Facing while analyzing Dim/Fact Table % using RSRV

Hi All,
When we analyzing the infocube in RSRV to see percentage of Dimension tables, system is showing 0% for all the dimensions and also for Fact tables.
But data is existing in fact table of infocube and also in dimensions tables, when we see in SE11.we also executed report SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS in SE38, in their also we are not able to find any entry for particular infocube.Please advice on this ASAP.
Regards
Manoj

Hi,
Check whethere the statistics for the cube is run. If not refresh the stats ans then chk in RSRV or in SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS you will get the ratio betwene ur dim and fact table
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Malar B

Design question - add another table or another column?

Hi there,
quick design question:
I have the following tables:
Traveler
CreditCard
Group
A traveler is going with group X and pay (creditCard) with Y. he can go on multiple groups and can pay with Y or Z...
my question is this:
should I make another table CrditCard_Group which will have the following columns:
user_id
group_id
creditCard_id
or simply to have in the creditCard table another column: Group_id
thanks for any advise

This is not JDBC nor Java, it's database modeling.
Said this, the answer is: it depends; if you have to record the fact that a traveler belonging to a group pays with credit card X you need the table with three ids. If you just need to record the traveler using a credit card and the traveler belonging to a group you need two tables each with the two ids.

How to use Radiobutton Cell Editor in Table using Master Column

Hi Guys,
I have a Table that uses a Master Column. I need to have a field that uses a Radio Button type cell editor. A user should only be ably to select ONE row via the Radio Button at a time.
I have done all this but I only seem to be able to select multiple radio buttons instead of only one. It is like the radio buttons do not get "regognised" as a group. Could you please advise as I probably set the "keyToSelect" and "selectedKey" properties incorrectly.
tks
Christiaan

I think the following should work:
Context:
Rows (node,c=0:n)
--- rowIndex (integer)
selectedRowIndex (integer)
Bind the "selectedKey" property of the radio button (cell editor) to attribute "selectedRowIndex" (outside table data source node) and bind "keyToSelect" to attribute "Rows.rowIndex". Make sure that the "rowIndex" attribute will contain the index of the node element in node "Rows".
Armin

Multiple row selection in ADF Table using addition column with checkbox

I am using ADF table(Jdeveloper11g) and i want to selecte multiple rows it may be more than one OR all rows.
For that i added one Column to the table with Header Delete and checkbox
<af:table....
<af:column sortProperty="Delete" headerText="Delete" width="100"
sortable="false">
<af:selectBooleanCheckbox label="#{row.favoriteId}"
valueChangeListener="#{Mybean.onCheck}"
id="checkbox" autoSubmit="true">
</af:selectBooleanCheckbox>
</af:column>
</af:table>
backing bean:Here i added code to get Value of one column with id favoriteId and use an arrayList(listForDelete) to monitor the state of the checkboxes
public void onCheck(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
DCBindingContainer dcBindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding iterBind =
(DCIteratorBinding)bindings.get("getUserFavoritesByUserIDIterator");
if (iterBind != null && iterBind.getCurrentRow() != null) {
RichSelectBooleanCheckbox ch = (RichSelectBooleanCheckbox)valueChangeEvent.getSource();
if (!ch.isSelected()) {
Long issueId = (Long)iterBind.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("favoriteId");
listForDelete.add(issueId);
else
Long issueId = (Long)iterBind.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("favoriteId");
listForDelete.remove(issueId);
Problem is that when i select single row checkBox, onCheck() method of backing bean gets called multiple times(equals to the number of rows)
I think this is beacuse of <af:selectBooleanCheckbox id is same that is "checkbox" but i am not sure.Even i tried to assign some unique id but no any success in assigning Id with value Expression.
I also find related post
Re: ADF Table Multiple row selection by Managed Bean
but that is related to Select All rows or Deselect all rows from table.
From the simillar post i follow the steps given by Frank.but problem with below step
->have an af:clientAttribute assigned to the checkbox with the following EL #{row.key} ,here I added <af:clientAttribute name="#{row.key}"></af:clientAttribute> and i am getting error
Error(64,37): Static attribute must be a String literal, its illegal to specify an expression.
Please let me know if any one had already implemented same test case.
Thanks for all help
Jaydeep
Edited by: JaydeepJ on Aug 7, 2009 4:42 AM

just to update after the rollback is called in the cancel button i wrote following code which does not change the row focus to the first row
DCBindingContainer bc =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingUtils.getBindingContext().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding profItr =
bc.findIteratorBinding("ProfileSearchInstIterator");
Row cRow = profItr.getRowAtRangeIndex(0);
if(cRow != null){
System.out.println("Current row is not null so fixed ");
profItr.setCurrentRowIndexInRange(0);
RowKeySetImpl rks = new RowKeySetImpl();
ArrayList keyList = new ArrayList();
keyList.add(cRow.getKey());
rks.add(keyList);
profileTable.setSelectedRowKeys(rks);
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(profileTable);
}

General Question: should Fact Table use virtual column?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for