Geocoding: initial call to geocoder VERY SLOW
Hi,
we use Oracle 10gR2 for geocoding Europe.
We encounter this odd behavior:
The first call to sdo_gcdr.geocode() in a session takes much longer than all superceding calls in that session. Depending on the environment we talk about 4 minutes for the first call and 4 seconds or less for the following ones in that session!!
The reason seems to be this:
For every sessions' initial call to the geocoder country profiles are loaded from the database. This is documented in ORACLE trc-files. However, Country Profiles are loaded redundantly. Redundance increases with the number of entries in GC_COUNTRY_PROFILE:
If I only have one entry in GC_COUNTRY_PROFILE, that profile is loaded twice.
If I have two entries in GC_COUNTRY_PROFILE, each profile is loaded 4 times.
If I have three entries in GC_COUNTRY_PROFILE, each profile is loaded 6 times.
If I have four entries in GC_COUNTRY_PROFILE, each profile is loaded 8 times.
If I have 17 entries as I want to have, each profile is loaded 32 times.
This apparently has impact on performance of that initial call!
What is the reason for this and how can I eliminate it? Loading each profile ONCE is enough, really.
Cheers
Sebastian
This is not fixed in 10.2.0.3 either.
This is actually an adjustment we have to make in our code to deal
with the NAVTEQ data and NAVTEQ notified us about this issue
only recently.
It is the sdogcdr.jar file that causes the issue only with the database JAVAVM.
The same jar file works ok with the J2EE version of the geocoder.
siva
Similar Messages
-
Dashboard to BEx query call run time very slow (7-8 mins)
Hi Guys,
I am currently working on a project where BEx query is being consumed using BICS. The functional team has built a BEx which is being cached in Webi by the BO developer and then that cashed Webi is being used in Dashboard. We have many hierarchies (Fund Center, Profit Center, GL Account etc.) used in the dashboard.
BEx query > WEBi (Cached) > Dashboard
Clicking the main level in hierarchy in dashboard the data comes back in 2-3 secs as the data is cached in Webi
ISSUE: In Dashboard based on where user is on the Fund Center hierarchy there is a button called “Summary Report” on the dashboard which calls the BEx query and that second call takes roughly about 7-8 minutes. How could we reduce the run time of the second query?
The secondary query uses the same data set as the first one but as the data is cached in Webi and it uses Web services to pass data to dashboard, so any call back from dashboard to the cached webi the hierarchy information is lost and thus the secondary query call to BEx query.
Would it be possible to recommend any solution where we could bring the run time of the secondary call to less than a minute?
Thanks,
KeysFirst update to current frontend patch. many correction are included.
Further check these notes: (relavant only if Analyzer is culprit)
1160093: REPAIR MODE - Prog error/performance problems when using large workbooks
1289127: REPAIR MODE - BExAnalyzer: performance issue applying styles in Excel 2007
1293255: REPAIR MODE - BExAnalyzer: crash when repairing workbook with Excel 2007
1150242+1094799: ANA_USE_SIDGRID - Improving performance/memory in the BEx Analyzer
1179647: ANA_USE_TABLE - Performance: Network load in BEx Analyzer
1260213: ANA_USE_OPTIMIZE_STG - Performance problems during workbook opening in Excel 2007
1287179: ANA_SINGLEDPREFRESH - Single Data Provider Refresh
1286653: Performance issues while displaying hierarchy (especially in Excel 2007)
1352375: ANA_USE_SIDGRIDWBUF / ANA_USE_SIDGRIDMASS Performance improvements in a WAN (roundtrip reductions)
1373214: Workbook compression
1392745: ANA_CACHE_WORKBOOK - Workbook caching -
My 2009 Macbook Pro is running very slow
After installing Maverick on my 2009 Macbrook Pro initially the result was very slow, practically unresponsive and unusable. After investigating many reports of similar problems I have not found anything to rectify the problem. Have downloaded and reinstalled Maverick - have tried many suggestions but whilst currently marginally usable I am getting to the end of my patience and am very disapponted that it would not seem that Apple have sorted this problem out with an answer or even an apology. Please, please Apple sort yourseves out - you will cause yourselves iripairable damage if you continue to ignore the many problems that are being reported - this is my question to you - when and if will you sort this out please?
Thank you for your reply and help - information below:-
Hardware Information:
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2009)
MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro5,5
1 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2 cores
2 GB RAM
Video Information:
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M - VRAM: 256 MB
System Software:
OS X 10.9.1 (13B42) - Uptime: 0 days 1:31:19
Disk Information:
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA02 disk0 : (160.04 GB)
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) /: 124.98 GB (37.76 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
BOOTCAMP (disk0s4) /Volumes/BOOTCAMP: 34.2 GB (1.38 GB free)
MATSHITADVD-R UJ-868
USB Information:
Seagate Desktop 2 TB
EFI (disk1s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
SEAGATE 2TB MAC (disk1s2) /Volumes/SEAGATE 2TB MAC: 2 TB (863.85 GB free)
Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Apple Inc. iPhone
Apple Inc. iPad
Logitech USB Receiver
Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
FireWire Information:
Thunderbolt Information:
Kernel Extensions:
com.avg.Antivirus.OnAccess.kext (14.0)
net.kromtech.kext.Firewall (2.3.5 - SDK 10.8)
com.livedrive.filesystems.livedrivefs (2.1.14)
com.trusteer.driver.gakl_driver_2 (1)
Problem System Launch Daemons:
Problem System Launch Agents:
Launch Daemons:
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.avg.Antivirus.infosd.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.avg.Antivirus.services.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.trusteer.rooks.rooksd.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.zeobit.MacKeeper.AntiVirus.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.zeobit.MacKeeper.plugin.AntiTheft.daemon.plist 3rd-Party support link
Launch Agents:
[loaded] com.avg.Antivirus.gui.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.lexmark.lexnetlaunchd.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.trusteer.rapport.rapportd.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] jp.buffalo.NASPower.plist 3rd-Party support link
[not loaded] jp.buffalo.NASPower_pla.plist 3rd-Party support link
User Launch Agents:
[loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist 3rd-Party support link
[failed] com.apple.SafariBookmarksSyncer.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.nchsoftware.expressinvoice.agent.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] com.zeobit.MacKeeper.Helper.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] uk.co.markallan.clamxav.clamscan.plist 3rd-Party support link
[loaded] uk.co.markallan.clamxav.freshclam.plist 3rd-Party support link
User Login Items:
iTunesHelper
Dropbox
AutoLaunchApp
LivedriveCore
RealPlayer Downloader Agent
VMware Fusion Start Menu
Internet Plug-ins:
Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 6.0 3rd-Party support link
Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 3.2.0.16 - SDK 10.8 3rd-Party support link
npBTEmailConfig: Version: 1.0 3rd-Party support link
CouponPrinter-FireFox: Version: Version 1.0.11X
AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 10.1.8 3rd-Party support link
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 11.9.900.170 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
RealPlayer Plugin: Version: (null) 3rd-Party support link
Silverlight: Version: 5.1.10411.0 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
Flash Player: Version: 11.9.900.170 - SDK 10.6 3rd-Party support link
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 10.1.8 3rd-Party support link
Scorch: Version: 6.2.0 3rd-Party support link
JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.8.0 - SDK 10.9 Outdated! Update
Audio Plug-ins:
BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
AirPlay: Version: 1.9 - SDK 10.9
AppleAVBAudio: Version: 2.0.0 - SDK 10.9
iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
User Internet Plug-ins:
Picasa: Version: 1.0 3rd-Party support link
3rd Party Preference Panes:
Flash Player 3rd-Party support link
Flip4Mac WMV 3rd-Party support link
MacFUSE 3rd-Party support link
Paragon NTFS for Mac ® OS X 3rd-Party support link
TaskBoard 3rd-Party support link
Trusteer Endpoint Protection 3rd-Party support link
Bad Fonts:
None
Old Applications:
SLLauncher: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
/Library/Application Support/Microsoft/Silverlight/OutOfBrowser/SLLauncher.app
Wondershare Helper Compact: Version: 2.2.6.4 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
/Users/rogerpalmer/Library/Application Support/Helper/Wondershare Helper Compact.app
Camptune X: Version: 10.1 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
Picasa: Version: 3.9.16 - SDK 10.4 3rd-Party support link
Windows Server Launchpad: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.5 3rd-Party support link
Time Machine:
Skip System Files: NO
Mobile backups: ON
Auto backup: YES
Volumes being backed up:
Macintosh HD: Disk size: 116.40 GB Disk used: 81.23 GB
Destinations:
SEAGATE 2TB MAC [Local] (Last used)
Total size: 2
Total number of backups: 26
Oldest backup: 2013-12-28 13:51:44 +0000
Last backup: 2014-01-05 07:31:48 +0000
Size of backup disk: Excellent
Backup size 2 > (Disk size 116.40 GB X 3)
Time Machine details may not be accurate.
All volumes being backed up may not be listed.
Top Processes by CPU:
4% WindowServer
3% backupd
1% EtreCheck
1% RealPlayer Downloader Agent
0% AVG
Top Processes by Memory:
213 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
117 MB Safari
43 MB Finder
41 MB Messages
35 MB AVG
Virtual Memory Information:
41 MB Free RAM
579 MB Active RAM
540 MB Inactive RAM
285 MB Wired RAM
945 MB Page-ins
97 MB Page-outs -
Initial RMI call to the server very slow
I have an RMI client who is trying to connect to an RMI server.
The server is behind a physical firewall, i think its netscreen, during the first call of the client, it is registering itself to the remote object in the server, the call takes up aroung two-three minutes to complete, after that, the succeeding remote method calls are fast, why is this happening?
need help on thisthe call takes up aroung two-three minutes to
completesorry, i meant the client takes two-three minutes before it was able to call the method, once called, the method proceeds normally, then the succeeding calls are not that slow anymore -
Very slow start when initially entering the service ticket in Web UI (2007)
We seem to encounter a very slow start when initially entering the service ticket in Web UI (2007). Once in all seems speedy enough. I don't have my access arrange for the Service marketplace (OSS notes) yet so can't check if there is a known solution, which I suspect there is. Has anyone encountered this problem and possibly resolved it?.
Jason.Previous posts have highlighted the following notes:
1048388 General Performance improvements of BSP transactions
1162605 Network performance for CRM 2007 Webclient
1162685 SAP CRM 2007 Webclient Performance
821045 Poor performance of MIME objects in BSP pages
581316 BSP Delta-Handling for CRM (BASIS 620 SP17)
However, I was wondering whether anyone has come across any other small changes that may have a major effect. A quick-win I guess you call it. From bitter experience I know there are rarely quick wins when it comes to optimisation due to the amount of re-testing etc.
But any further advice would be welcome.
Jas. -
Initial search on ITunes store very slow
We're using ITunes 7.6 on a Windows Vista PC. Users without parental controls can access the store with no issues. Kids accounts, though, can access Itunes and the store, but the initial search is very slow - 10 minutes on a 6 MB DSL connection. When these searches finally complete, access is then at expected speeds - a few seconds per request. I have not had any successful tips from tech support yet. We have uninstalled and reinstalled Itunes and Quicktime.
tspatt,We didn't have luck with adding http://ax.phobos.apple.com.edgesuite.net/ to the allowed web addresses in Vista's Parental Controls. We already had apple.com allowed.We still have the same problem with the iTunes store taking several minutes to load.Call me a cynic, but, I think Apple really isn't motivated to find a solution. I think they like seeing MS product users experience pain. On the flip side, we already know that MS likes all of it's competitors to fail.If you have Windows XP or Vista and want Parental Controls, the only solution seems to be to use a different music provider instead of iTunes.
-
VERY slow initial full back up using Time Machine.
I had a problem with my Time Capsule and had to erase the drive. Now it's running the initial full back up - but, in 21 hours and 48 minutes it's only done 93.11 GB of the total 241.05 GB. Is this very slow progress normal? I'm sure it didn't take this long when I first ran the initial back up when the Time Capsule was new.
daveff wrote:
I am having the same problem, i have a 2 tb WD Element USB HDD. I have had my imac for 2.5years but has now slowed right down.
Doesn't sound like the same problem. You seem to have a problem with your Mac, not necessarily backing-up.
I decided to use time machine to back everything up. I formated the WD to the same as my mac and ran time machine but has only completed 9.81gb out of 485.68gb and not moved for 6 hours.
Cancel the backup (if it won't cancel after several minutes, see #D6 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting).
Then verify your internal HD, per #6 in Using Disk Utility.
If that reports that it "seems to be ok," you may have a hardware problem. Try running this: Intel-based Macs: Using Apple Hardware Test. Run the Extended tests (that may take an hour or so, depending on how much RAM you have). Write down any error code(s) it shows.
Apart from doing a back when i first purchased the imac.
You haven't done a backup in 2 1/2 years? Eeek! -
Is there a telephone number I can call after 7:00 p.m.? I'm not at home and I need to call Support to help me speed up my MAC. Ever since I upgraded to the Maverick my computer has been very slow and it's very annoying.
you can call AppleCare. In the US, the are open until 9PM EST. Not free though if you do not have applecare: http://support.apple.com/kb/he57
-
I have just got my new 1TB Time capsule and set it up but it appears VERY SLOW!!!! in 12 hrs it has done 10gb?
I have tried restarting with a LAN connection? I just wondered if anyone else is having the same problem? or any idea why it is so slow?
thanksIf you haven't read it already I would check put the following Apple KB article with tips on TM initial backup to TC:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=307525
Ethernet cable would be the fastest way to go. There are some applications run in OS X that can slow down TM such as virus checkers. Also file corruptions can slow TM down from OSX running client Mac. If slowness persists frequently delving into the console logs can provide insights into where problems lie. It's also worth bearing in mind wireless networking factors that can slow down network transmission speeds to Mac clients such as interference or range from the wireless access point. -
For tablet touch is very slow in firefox OS. Some times it is hanging. While dialing number to call it taking to much time. How to fix and debug this issue. Waiting for your reply.
Hi sb00349044,
I'm sorry to hear that you are having problems with your Firefox OS device. Can you please specify the device Model and Version?
If your device is one of the Firefox OS Tablets from the contribution program, please be aware that those builds are still being improved and ironed out. If that is the case, please follow the guidelines for the contributor program to report issues with the device.
Thanks,
- Ralph -
After ICS upgrade Phone is very slow to make a call
After ICS upgrade , when I select a contact to call , and then press cell or home , the response time is very slow.
I have pressed the call button more than once thinking it did not take. Then when it does take I end up calling the person
more than once because it has buffered the calls . What can be causing this ?
If you have an answer Please email me at: Personal email address removed to comply with VZW ToS< Thanks
Message was edited by: Verizon ModeratorMine and my wifes thunderbolts have become horrible since the upgrade was pushed. Apps are slow, or don't even load some times. Trying to make a phone call is sluggish and at times it will try to call twice at the same time for some reason.
however, i overlooked all of this because i liked the look of ICS. then last week after being pushed two updates in a row, it now will just turn off at random times. i can't even go to a webpage anymore because it will immediately crash. better yet, when i try to reboot the phone, it will get to the point where it recognizes the verizon network, and then just shut off again. this happened to me 8 times in a row the other day. it will also say that the battery is in the red, even though it had a full charge before the crash.
i have found that if i plug my phone in and then boot it up, it will boot up correctly. that is the only way i have been able to get it to actually boot up since all of this started happening. it will still show the battery is about to die, and then about 15 minutes later it will show it is at 100% again.
i tried to do the chat with a reprensentative today and the guy was asking for my account password before he could look into my issue. what kind of company asks for a password. that is the dumbest thing i have seen. so now, i have a phone that "sometimes" works, and online chat that reminds me of a scamming site.
when my wife called to talk to someone they told her that it was htc's fault and that it would cost us $60 each to switch to new phones. how is that customer service? besides, verizon's network sent the update. there is no way that they can try to say it wasn't their fault. that isn't how the real world works.
i have reposted this from another thread, but since there seems to be someone from VZW reading this, perhaps some info can be found... -
my samsung stratosphere is very slow to place a call. I input the number and push CALL. Nothing happens. I try it again and nothing happens. Then some time later (2-5 mins) the phone goes ahead and dials. What is causing this delay in dialing.
wadams5641,
Let's add some speed to your service and ensure you can make calls without the
delay. When was the last time you turned off your phone? Is the software up to
date?
KarenC_VZW -
Simple Soap Test, VERY SLOW with XP, only 5 calls per second !
Hello,
I'm just starting developing a web service. My first test shows a very slow performance of only about 5 calls per second:
Windows XP client localhost -> Windows XP server: 2000 calls per second
Windows XP client in VM on server maschine -> Windows XP server: 4,5 calls per second
Windows XP client over 100 MBit LAN -> Windows XP server: 2000 calls per second: 4,5 calls per second
Windows XP client over 1000 MBit LAN -> Windows XP server: 2000 calls per second: 4,5 calls per second
So you might think, that is it, but - using identical jars:
Mac OS X, 10.6 client -> Windows XP server: 880 calls per second
Windows XP client -> Mac OS X 10.6 server: 4,5 calls per second
So the problem seems to be the client setup on an Windows XP system.
This is the service code:
package net.metasafe.soapbenchmark.server;
import javax.jws.WebMethod;
import javax.jws.WebService;
@WebService
public class TestLib {
private int count = 0;
public TestLib() {
// nothing to do
@WebMethod
public int div(int a, int b) {
this.count++;
if (b == 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("b must not be 0!");
return a / b;
@WebMethod
public int getNumberOfCalls() {
return this.count;
@WebMethod
public void resetCount() {
this.count = 0;
}This is the sevice publisher:
package net.metasafe.soapbenchmark.server;
import javax.xml.ws.Endpoint;
class ServicesPublisher {
public static void main(String[] args) {
if (args.length != 2) {
System.out.println("2 Arguments required: <servername/IP> <port>");
return;
String url = "http://" + args[0] + ":" + args[1] + "/services";
System.out.println("Publishing TestLib service at url '" + url + "'.");
Endpoint.publish(url, new TestLib());
}This is the client code:
public static void main(String[] args) throws MalformedURLException {
if (args.length != 3) {
System.out
.println("3 Arguments required: <servername/IP> <port> <number of calls>");
return;
int num = Integer.parseInt(args[2]);
URL url = new URL("http://" + args[0] + ":" + args[1]
+ "/services?wsdl");
System.out.println("Conneting to service '" + url + "' .... ");
QName qname = new QName("http://some_uri/",
"TestLibService");
TestLibService service = new TestLibService(url, qname);
TestLib tl = service.getTestLibPort();
System.out.println("Connected !");
// reset count
tl.resetCount();
System.out.println("\nPerforming " + num + " calls ...");
long starttime = System.currentTimeMillis();
int i;
for (i = 1; i <= num; i++) {
tl.div(i, 2);
if (i % 100 == 0)
System.out.println(i);
long t = System.currentTimeMillis() - starttime;
System.out.println("Performed " + tl.getNumberOfCalls() + " calls in "
+ (t / 1000.0f) + " seconds.");
System.out.println("Calls per second: " + (num * 1000.0f / t));
System.out.println("Done");
}Any idea, why this is so slow, if the client runs on an Windwos XP (Pro) system ?
Is there anything I have to be aware of when choosing the QName ?
Best regards
MarcHello,
no one any idea on for this ?
How many calls do you get normally on Windows XP machines ?
Regards
Markus -
TRFC call are very slow going to SIEBEL (TCP/IP RFC problem)
Hi everyone,
we have a problem when testing a connection to a TCP/IP RFC. this is also related to IDOCS being pushed to SIEBEL end. the logon time is very slow.
not sure if this is on SAP end or on theirs. Could anyone give info on this? any would be appreciated.
Logon
48356 msec
Transfer of 0 KB
7 msec
Transfer of 10 KB
6 msec
Transfer of 20 KB
7 msec
Transfer of 30 KB
6 msec
we are also seeing a lot of IDOCs (SM58) that have status Text as "Transaction Recorded".Hi,
i've resolved problem 46029, but it remains loop problem in Oracle Bi Administration Tool. In addition, if in Answers I click on "Create Direct Request" I have results immediately. Otherwise if I submit a query on "Settings->Administration->Issue SQL, system goes in loop as in Administration Tool. At this point a begin to think that problem is at AWM creation cube step. In your opinion? What about your opinion? What other checks can I do, to resolve the situation?
P.S. If I submit the same query given from NQSQuery.log under SQL PLUS, it goes in loop.
P.S.2. I've tried all on a smaller cube. "Update Row Count" or "Retrieve Data" in Administration Tool now responds in acceptable time. I've deployed cube in Answers, and even in it , query returns in acceptable time. But it's a very small cube. For larger cubes situation is that explained. However, in this way, i think i can exclude all previous problems as cause of my issue. What do you think? However the problem remains. What can i do?
My trouble is that I have still deployed a month ago a cube which responds in two seconds even to complex queries :-). Since that moment, performance has been always worst. The only change i've made has been of execute procedure to have multiple catalogs (and rpds) on same machine...
Thanks
Giancarlo
Edited by: user5380662 on 4-mag-2010 6.55
Edited by: user5380662 on 4-mag-2010 7.25 -
Scrolling slow with initial marquee selection, but very fast when adding to selection
I've found that when I zoom in and try to make a selection that requires me to scroll beyond the viewable area, the scrolling becomes very slow when I scroll down. And if I add to the selection (via shift) the scroll becomes very fast, as if the shift key nudges the screen by x number of pixels, just as if I were to shift-move a layer. Is this the intended behavior?
Ramon, my apologies. I own a MacBook Pro running OS 10.5.6, 2.4 GHz prcoessor with 2 GB of RAM, and 256 MB of VRAM. I'm using Photoshop CS4.
So I ran a couple tests and I think I know what's occurring. The scroll speed seems dependent on how close or far the cursor is from the canvas edge (the axis in between the image and the scrollbar). So for example, if I were to do a max zoom the window would expand to the very edge of the desktop. When I start the marquee and move my cursor to scroll it's unable to move any further from the axis because of the desktop edge. This would cause it to scroll more slowly.
Here are a couple of test vids (The zoom is at 3200% and I set up the camera to focus on the top right of the screen):
Window right up against desktop edge (automatically positioned via Photoshop max zoom)
http://s87.photobucket.com/albums/k156/darthsauce/mac/?action=view¤t=horiz01.flv
Window edge moved a little away from desktop edge
http://s87.photobucket.com/albums/k156/darthsauce/mac/?action=view¤t=horiz03.flv
Window edge moved past the desktop edge (but axis is still visible)
http://s87.photobucket.com/albums/k156/darthsauce/mac/?action=view¤t=horiz00.flv
Could this be considered an oversight in the design since zoom automatically resizes the window for us (of course, this would affect users differently depending on their zoom ratio and display resolution)? This means that I'll have to resize the window each time the zoom fills the desktop in order to scroll at a proper rate.
Maybe you are looking for
-
1st generation iPod Nano replacement program not working
On the support page from apple i can fill in the serial number, but it won't direct me to the next page to fill in my adres Apple - Support - iPod nano (1st generation) Replacement Program
-
Flash Builder 4, Data Services, PHP issue
I have installed a fresh Galileo + Fb4 plugin + WST for eclipse on my dev server/workstation. I have installed a standalone Fb4 on my laptop. When I use the shwanky new Data services feature and create a PHP service... I can create the service fine..
-
Acrobat Pro 8, 9 and X installed. Can I uninstall 8 and 9?
I migrated my old MacBook Pro to my new MacBook Pro in January (OS X 10.7.4). I now have 3 versions of Acrobat Pro on my Mac, Pro 8, Pro 9 and Pro X. Can I uninstall 8 and 9 without having to re-install X?
-
Hello everyone! I wish to inquire your wisdom on this matter
Hello there! I'm a GFX hobbyist and I've been using Photoshop CS3 at home and CS4 at school. I am into making tags(sigs) and afew large pieces., but recently I noticed that when I upload my images on the web specifically thru Photobucket.. the qualit
-
Dear sirs! Here is how the story goes. Firstly, I installed VMware Workstation with Mac OS X running within it. It all worked perfectly fine. However, soon I did some modifications to my current system: 1) Installed Bespin and BE::Shell 2) Renamed mu