Get iterations with dense_rank()?

Let's say I have the following 2 tables:
LOOKUP_TABLE
LOOKUP_ID     ITERATION
1     12
2     3
3     4
4     2
5     6
6     8PROCESS_TABLE
PROCESS_ID     LOOKUP_ID
1     3
2     1
3     5
4     2
5     3
6     67and I want to pass process_id as a parameter in a sql-statement with the following requirements:
The PROCESS_ID is the serial count and ITERATION is the multiplier. For example: if process_id = 5, the iteration is 4 so you will have 4 times a count till 5.
OUTPUT
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5I started with a statement but I can't get the numbers right. Could dense_rank() helps me with my requerements?
   SELECT rownum rn
   FROM all_object
   WHERE rownum <=
      SELECT process_id * iteration
      FROM lookup_table l,process_table p
      WHERE l.lookup_id = p.lookup_id 
      AND process_id = :param
   )

Another solution using the model clause:
SQL> create table lookup_table
  2  as
  3  select 1 lookup_id, 12 iteration from dual union all
  4  select 2, 3 from dual union all
  5  select 3, 4 from dual union all
  6  select 4, 2 from dual union all
  7  select 5, 6 from dual union all
  8  select 6, 8 from dual
  9  /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create table process_table
  2  as
  3  select 1 process_id, 3 lookup_id from dual union all
  4  select 2, 1 from dual union all
  5  select 3, 5 from dual union all
  6  select 4, 2 from dual union all
  7  select 5, 3 from dual union all
  8  select 6, 67 from dual
  9  /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> var P_PROCESS_ID number
SQL> exec :P_PROCESS_ID := 5
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> select num
  2    from process_table p
  3       , lookup_table l
  4   where p.lookup_id = l.lookup_id
  5     and p.process_id = :P_PROCESS_ID
  6   model
  7         dimension by (1 i)
  8         measures (0 num, iteration)
  9         rules
10         iterate (1000) until (iteration_number+1>=nvl(:P_PROCESS_ID * iteration[1],0))
11         ( num[iteration_number] = 1 + mod(iteration_number,:P_PROCESS_ID)
12         )
13   order by i
14  /
       NUM
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
20 rijen zijn geselecteerd.
SQL> exec :P_PROCESS_ID := 3
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> select num
  2    from process_table p
  3       , lookup_table l
  4   where p.lookup_id = l.lookup_id
  5     and p.process_id = :P_PROCESS_ID
  6   model
  7         dimension by (1 i)
  8         measures (0 num, iteration)
  9         rules
10         iterate (1000) until (iteration_number+1>=nvl(:P_PROCESS_ID * iteration[1],0))
11         ( num[iteration_number] = 1 + mod(iteration_number,:P_PROCESS_ID)
12         )
13   order by i
14  /
       NUM
         1
         2
         3
         1
         2
         3
         1
         2
         3
         1
         2
         3
         1
         2
         3
         1
         2
         3
18 rijen zijn geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob.

Similar Messages

  • How to get iterator with out dragging the table?

    Hi,
    Kindly help me out in getting the iterator for a view object with out dragging it on to the JSF page.
    Can we create bindings in the binding container with out dragging the table on to page.
    Kindly come up with suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Phani

    if i understud correclty. follow this
    public String getit58Value() {
    try
    if(!this.isEmptyDescr())
    DCBindingContainer dcBindings = (DCBindingContainer)getBindings();
    DCIteratorBinding dcIterator = dcBindings.findIteratorBinding("CrmCntrl2View1Iterator"); // r u meaning something like this. // am accessing without drop in jspx page
    System.out.println(""+dcBindings.getIterBindings());
    Row row = dcIterator.getCurrentRow();
    this.setEmptyDescr(false);
    System.out.println(""+row.getAttribute("BuDesc"));
    return (String)row.getAttribute("BuDesc");
    and another one .
    pagedef file . in bindings.
    we can create bindings as we need.
    but one suggestion. by default adf tak care its bindings . so time to ask what is usecase?

  • Lpad use with dense_rank question

    Hi, I looked up lpad/rpad in the 10g Complete refernce but can't seem to figure if I can use it in conjunction with dense_rank.
    When I run "DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY 'batch_doc_total' ORDER BY ae.emp_code) AS "batch_skey"," I get numbers starting with 1 however i want it to start with 0001. I have tried about 50 different ways of using the lpad but have had no succes in this case. Can anyone offer a suggestion or does anyone know if there is a limitation with using the 2 functions together?
    Cheers, Peter

    SQL> select empno,lpad(dense_rank() over(order by sal),5,'0') rnk
      2  from emp;
         EMPNO RNK
          7369 00001
          7900 00002
          7876 00003
          7521 00004
          7654 00004
          7934 00005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Getting iteration number in row level trigger

    Hi. Is there a way to get iteration number in row level trigger? Or to access data inserted in statement level trigger from row level trigger (statement level trigger are supposed to be executed before row level triggers but I cannot access them).
    I'm using Oracle 10g.

    My oracle version:
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    And business problem is like this:
    I need to have two log tables for some tables in my database:
    First log table is a statement level log. After insert or update or delete it should get one new row with mentioning date, time, sid, query type and some additional information.
    Second table should include all columns from table logged, date, time, sid and operation type.
    The problem is, I need exact the same date and time for each row in both log tables.
    Someone said that sysdate should return same value for query execution time. But it have nothing to do with triggers fired on this query.
    So you may say that I'm curious about getting exact same date and time for one statement level trigger and for each execution of row level trigger.

  • Any performance overhead if we get iterator over values stored in map

    Hi Everybody,
    Is there any performance overhead if we get iterator over values stored in map. like this
    Iterator itr = rolesMap.values().iterator();
    if yes please explain...thanks in advance.

    ejp wrote:
    That's rather out of date. It is how Hashtable works, but as regards HashMap it isn't. The keySet() iterator and the values() iterator are both written in terms of the entrySet() iterator. There is no skipping over unused slots.Out of date? In that case there's been a recent advance in hashed data structures I've missed.
    Or the HashMap implementation has been recently changed to internally link entries to improve iteration performance. I doubt that because such a list would degrade the performance of the HashMap in other ways and that's unacceptable (and unnecessary because of LinkedHashMap).
    Besides, what I said is in the Java 6 API documentation to LinkedHashMap. It may be out of date but I doubt it.
    So here we are with a fact of nature: Any iteration of a hash based data structure will be proportional to capacity rather than the number of entries, unless a supportive list style data structure is introduced to overcome this.

  • New account gets created with wrong permissions (777 instead of 755)

    Hey Apple and Forum people, looks like there's a pretty bothersome error in the way that user permissions get set when you set a user's home folder to a drive partition.
    By default, a user's home folder is supposed to get 755, with all of its subdirectories (excluding Public and Sites) as 700. But if you set up a new user and point his/her home folder to a partition or a separate drive, the folder is set to 777 - meaning that anyone can read, write, and execute any file they'd like to from that drive.
    Given the sensible defaults of 755 during normal user creation, I can't believe this was intentional. And if it was intentional, then it's wrong and ought to be changed.

    Set the permissions on the other volume's root directory the same as the boot volume.
    owner:root
    group:admin
    chmod 1775
    Make a /Users directory on the other volume and
    set permissions same as on the boot volume,
    owner:root
    group:admin
    chmod 755
    create your new user directory in the /Users directory on the other volume.

  • Anyone know how to contact anyone in Verizon headquarters?  Since I'm not getting anywhere with Customer Service

    I'd like to express how unsatisfied we have been with Verizon on an issue that has been ongoing now since March 14, 2014.  It involves an upgrade on one of our lines.  After all these months, phone call with customer service, Tech support, and visits to a Verizon stores, I would hope that there are ample notation on our acct but since I've had to explain the situation on a bi-weekly time frame, I would assume that no one has documented any contacts.
    We've been with Verizon for few yrs now and I have always been very satisfied with Verizon who, up until now , always provided excellent customer service in their knowledge, concern, and customer satisfaction.  But I have to say, every positive outlook I've had with your company has been wiped clean with the worst service we have received in the last few months.
    We upgraded my daughter's phone on 03-14-14 with a Samsung Galaxy Mini from an Iphone 4s.  Within 24 hrs, the phone failed.  After 2 visits to a Verizon store the next day which took 6 hrs, we still had to return the next day to speak to a manager.  The 2 stores advised us to make a CLAIM on the defective phone thru our insurance plan with Verizon.  A CLAIM on a 24 hr old phone!!  A 3rd visit with a manager finally convinced him to replace the phone with another new phone at the store.  Within 2 weeks - issues began to occur with the replacement phone.  Several visits more, several calls more with Customer Service, several calls more with tech support which adds up to soooo many of our time taken up to simple have temporary "fixes" is outrageous.  If I billed Verizon for my time, perhaps the situation would have been resolved more quickly.  Each visit lasts approx 2 hrs, each phone call approx 1-1 1/2 hrs.  We are talking at least 2x a month for the course of 5 1/2 months.  Plus the time it takes to get the phone back to where she needs it - contacts, apps, internet. 
    Not once were we offered a new phone or replace the phone.  Not until today.  Replace the phone with the same phone that my daughter has grown to hate.  So basically a 3rd phone - same phone.  She is not interested in this phone any longer.  She dealt with this phone model for far too long.
    Today we were offered to replace the phone with same phone, or pay for a refurbished Iphone 4.  So basically she would be going back to her original Iphone 4s before the upgraded WITH a cost.  So her upgrade was wasted, we'd paid over $200 for a defective phone, and would need to pay for an even older model Iphone 4 and have to pay for it.  Why wasn't she offered a different phone within those 30 days after the upgrade and 6 visits? 
    Every rep at the stores, every rep in tech support would provide a different reason for the issue.  Finally, tech support advised not to download apps.  WHAT GOOD IS A SMARTPHONE IF YOU CAN'T HAVE APPS???  We are talking about a 20 yrs college student who attends school in another state.  Do you know the trouble she has to go thru to visit a store? To find 2 hrs between being a full time student with 2 jobs to sit on the phone with a tech support or go to a Verizon store?  Once-ok  Twice-maybe  BUT for 5 months?
    She's not eligible for an upgrade.  She will be stuck with a phone that she had grown to hate.  And I with customer service which I've grown to hate. 
    Finally, The Edge.  Trying to find a way to make my daughter happy, I spoke with 4 representative today about the Edge.  Each rep gave me 4 different information.  1st rep advised Edge phone could not be used on another line so I could not use a line eligible for the Edge and give that phone to my daughter since she isn't eligible for the Edge.   2nd rep advised that although new phone thru edge must be used by same number that it was eligible for, we could use the current phone o that line for my daughter.  My son currently has an Iphone 5 and is eligible for the Edge early upgrade.  He would not have to return his Iphone 5 so my daughter could use it.  However, all the lines would have to go to the More Everything Plan and share the Data between all our phone lines.  3rd rep advised the cost would almost double from our current $358 to go to the More Everything Plan so suggested to have 2 accounts vs just 1.  4th rep advised not every line needs to go the More Everything Plan, we could not keep the current phone, and my daughter could get a replacement phone but same phone or made exception to offer the Edge early upgrade to my daughter but only after we go thru the replacement program because the phone we send to Verizon has to be in good working order/no defects. 
    After 5 1/2 months, it is now Verizon that is indicating that we have a defective phone and can't accept it thru the Edge program or we would get billed approx $299 for a defective phone.  After 5 1/2 months of me calling in about a defective phone that not one rep replaced because they "fixed" the problem ( by the way, a temporary fix is not fixing, if it was fixed I would have made those calls today or writing this email), I am now being told her phone is defective.  She advised to get a replacement phone first, return the old phone, activate the new phone, then call in to get the Edge early upgrade.  So my daughter would have to do all this, plus add contacts back, apps and whatever else she needs to use her phone just to turn around a couple weeks later and do it all over again with the new phone thru the Edge program.  Once again, we are the ones having to be inconvenienced and go thru all these steps.  Did I mention she is going to be studying abroad in Italy beginning Nov?  So the idea of having to wait 2-3 weeks for a new phone and having only a week or 2 to test the phone to make sure it's working properly before she's out of the country doesn't sound appealing to me.  Verizon has made us have a defective phone for 5 months advising it's in good working order after each and every "fix" but Verizon will not accept that phone if returned in the same condition as a phone in good working condition.  Do you see the irony in that? 
    I have reached my limit and after 5 yrs of my brother in law trying to convince us to switch to AT&T where he works in their Corporate Office, I can honestly say I will not be sad to leave Verizon.  Especially when one of your reps simply provided me with the contract end dates to provide to AT&T because they offered to buy out our contract.  No effort in customer retention what so ever.  That was a phone call on Thursday. 
    And yes, one of your tech reps tried to convince me of all the hassle it would be to switch and time AT&T would take to buy out our contracts but honestly it was the pot calling the kettle.  I am not in the position to discuss hassle and time after 5 months of getting that with Verizon.  Did I mention it's my brother in law so we would be getting special treatment and no out of pocket expenses to switch.  It was my loyalty and satisfaction with Verizon that has kept me from switching all these years.  Something Verizon clearly does not appreciate. 
    So can you guess where I am with confidence that your customer service department is knowledgable about the plans/offers?  Where I am that I can trust what I'm being told?
    I know this email is confusing and really hard to understand...perhaps now you will know how i've been feeling--lost and confused with all the mis-information, with a hit and miss phone, and out of time with all the 1 1/2 hr to 2 hrs EACH wasted on this issue. 
    On top of all this, I can't even find out how to file a complaint with anyone higher up than Customer Service. 

    Jneklason wrote:
    ~snip~
    I know this email is confusing and really hard to understand...perhaps now you will know how i've been feeling--lost and confused with all the mis-information, with a hit and miss phone, and out of time with all the 1 1/2 hr to 2 hrs EACH wasted on this issue.
    On top of all this, I can't even find out how to file a complaint with anyone higher up than Customer Service.
    I hate to tell you this, but you didn't write an email. You wrote a discussion post on the Verizon Wireless Community forum which is a public peer to peer forum. Unfortunately since you didn't mark your post as a question, the VZW reps that roam this community won't ever see your post. Before you re-post it, don't. Duplicate posts get removed from the community.
    I see there were several missteps both by the reps and yourself in your post. First you should have insisted on returning the phone within the 14 day return policy period. Second which Samsung Galaxy mini model did you purchase? The S3 mini or the S4 mini? Did you do any research prior to deciding on this device. The reps at that time deflected the easiest course of action, by trying to get you to replace the phone under insurance instead of returning the phone. The Early Edge payment option requires the current phone on the line using the early Edge must be returned to Verizon Wireless. Did you once considered going to a third party site like Swappa to purchase a gently used device for your daughter?

  • I have a column where I have implemented writeback, its working fine. On top of this I need to show 0 as No and 1 as yes in our report, that is also done. Now I want to enter Yes in a column where it was no and I want database table to get update with 1.

    I have a column where I have implemented writeback, its working fine. On top of this I need to show 0 as No and 1 as yes in our report, that is also done. Now I want to enter Yes in a column where it was no and I want database table to get update with 1. I am not sure how to do it. SOmeone please help me out.

    Hi ,
    In your write back XML  try the below  query insert
    INSERT INTO TABLE_XYZ (attribute1)  values (SELECT CASE  WHEN @{C1}=’Yes’ then 1 when @{C1}=’No’ then 0 else null end from dual)
    Regards
    Rajagopal

  • Apple loops not getting saved with current projects tempo

    I can't seem to make an apple loop that would get saved with the current projects tempo....i recorded a single bar midi drum loop with 130 as project tempo but when i save it as an apple loop it gets saved with a tempo of 92bpm. strange thing is when i drag the same loop back on a instrument track it plays at the current tempo i.e., at 130bpm but if i drag it to an audio track it plays at 92bpm... really stuck here....any help would be greatly appreciated..thanx..

    ok now i have got half of the problem solved....i had left the "follow tempo" region parameter ticked....so now when i unticked it the loop follows the project tempo....but i dont understand y does the loops get saved with a tempo of 92 whereas the project tempo is 130bpm....moreover when i audition these loops they don't really LOOP while playin back....

  • Apple loops not getting saved with tempo info

    I can't seem to make an apple loop that would get saved with the current projects tempo....i recorded a single bar midi drum loop with 130 as project tempo but when i save it as an apple loop it gets saved with a tempo of 92bpm. strange thing is when i drag the same loop back on a instrument track it plays at the current tempo i.e., at 130bpm but if i drag it to an audio track it plays at 92bpm... really stuck here....any help would be greatly appreciated..thanx..

    ok now i have got half of the problem solved....i had left the "follow tempo" region parameter ticked....so now when i unticked it the loop follows the project tempo....but i dont understand y does the loops get saved with a tempo of 92 whereas the project tempo is 130bpm....moreover when i audition these loops they don't really LOOP while playin back....

  • To save time, could I get away with just using ProRes Proxy?

    Might be a dumb question.  But please play along with me...
    I've been battling with FCP-X since it first came out.  Beach balls, crashes, failed auto saves, you name it.  Sluggishness is my middle name.  But I think it might be because I'm trying to force too much quality through my older, less powerful machines and my little firewire 400 hard drive.  All three of my Mac are 3-4 years old, all are from the old "Core 2 Duo" era (not quad core processors), and are all maxed out at 4GB of RAM.  While I've read that many people are having performance problems with FCP-X even on brand spankin' new suped-up Mac Pros with lots more horsepower than I'm running, I've long thought that my machines and their lack of power by today's standards may be at the heart of my sluggishness problem, especially given that most of the material I work with is shot in 1080 HD.  (I've never actually tested it in FCP-X, but I'm assuming that things would speed along more like I've been used to in the past if I would just do everything in Standard Definition 480, but that ain't gonna happen.)
    Like many, I shoot most everything in 1080 HD (usually 24p, sometimes 30), unless I'm occasionally shooting 720 HD at 60i for later slowing down to slo-mo.
    Here's my question:  Most everything I edit is for web delivery, and 99 percent of it is for my own use (not clients).  Mostly podcast-like stuff, although occasionally I'll create something for my business website.  Most of what I do is talking head type stuff, not a lot of motion (except for the 720/60i slo-mo stuff, which usually has some motion, which is why I shoot it at 60i for slowing down).  Most of what I shoot is green screen talking heads, intended to be keyed in front of some innocuous background like some of the generators in FCP-X.  I want it to look good.  Even great.  But given the limitations of power on my machines, I also don't want to invest an eternity in rendering and processing time.  The work I'm doing with video just isn't that important.  It's mostly for grins.
    Until last night, I had been working exclusively in ProRes422 (aka "Optimized").  But last night I shot some footage and imported it into FCP-X, encoding it ONLY in ProRes Proxy.  And frankly, I couldn't discern any difference.  It looked every bit as good as the 422 stuff I'd shot before.  There was absolutely no difference to my naked eye.  That said, the footage I shot last night to test this out was not shot in front of the green screen (I'll test that out today or tonight), so maybe the Proxy footage won't key as well.  (I've been stunned at how good the keyer is in FCP-X, but up to this point I've only been keying ProRes422 footage, not Proxy.)  But really, based on just eyeballing the footage, I couldn't tell the difference between the Proxy footage and all the other footage I'd shot previously that had been imported and converted to "Optimized" ProRes422.
    I'm not looking to deliver anything for broadcast television (if I were, I'd for sure use 422).  I'm not doing any feature film type stuff.  My video work consists mainly of stuff just for me, for my own personal amusement (and for the amusement of anyone who might watch it on the web).  It's intended for YouTube, Vimeo, or occasionally (in smaller dimensions than 1920x1080) for deployment on my company website.  Mostly, it's just me doing podcast-type stuff.  Occasionally I'll shoot and edit something for church, or for friends.  I like to think the production values of my stuff tend to be higher than, say, the footage Aunt Delores shot at Uncle Ralph's birthday party (okay, A LOT higher than that!).  But my stuff isn't going to air on "Good Morning Flatbush" either (unless, on the off chance it should happen to go viral).
    So let me make my question as clear as possible:  Could I not get away with just using ProRes Proxy throughout my entire work flow, end to end, never switching over to ProRes 422 even when exporting?  Honestly, it has taken hours just to render the keyed green screen footage on a 15 minute video, and just the other night, it took the better part of 4 hours (after it was already rendered) to export a 15 minute ProRes422 sequence to YouTube (and then the darn thing timed out, essentially wasting all my time).  I'd rather just stay in Proxy the whole way through if doing so would streamline my workflow without compromising too much quality in the "look" of the video.  Based on my very limited use of Proxy (just testing it out last night for the first time), I couldn't tell the difference.  Maybe for web deployment, Proxy is all I really need.
    Have any of you just stayed in Proxy the whole way through, never switching to 422 even when exporting?  Might this be an acceptable work flow for some of us, especially those of us on older, less powerful machines?  Is this a viable solution?  Do any of you work this way?  What's your level of satisfaction?
    Thoughts?

    A lot of what I'm shooting is being shot on a Canon XA-10.  Some (and certainly all of the 720 footage, but some of the 1080) is shot on a 7D.  And still more is shot on either an iPhone 4S, or even on a Flip Ultra (720p, 30fps).
    Most is shot on the XA-10.
    What I'm trying to avoid is the excessive render times (doesn't the ProRes 422 footage have to render as well?), and the ridiculously long times it takes to export.  Would all that not be reduced significantly by sticking to Proxy the whole way?  And what would the trade-off be?  I mean, I honestly can't see any discernible difference.  Maybe I will when I try to pull a decent key.  (Haven't gotten that far yet in my Proxy experimentation.)
    Of course, editing in Proxy and outputting using 422 requires that FCP-X encode to BOTH when importing, right?  Doesn't that add yet another bit of time to the overall process?
    I'm trying to streamline, and to reduce the overall amount of time I'm spending doing this stuff.

  • My shuffle ,doesnt get syncronized with itunes in my pc,getting audio and video settings error,but able to get it syncronized with my friends pc

    my shuffle ,doesnt get syncronized with itunes in my pc,getting audio and video settings error,but able to get it syncronized with my friends pc    

    Try:                                               
    - iOS: Not responding or does not turn on           
    - Also try DFU mode after try recovery mode
    How to put iPod touch / iPhone into DFU mode « Karthik's scribblings
    - If not successful and you can't fully turn the iOS device fully off, let the battery fully drain. After charging for an least an hour try the above again.
    - Try another cable                     
    - Try on another computer                                                       
    - If still not successful that usually indicates a hardware problem and an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store is in order.
    Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar
    The missing apps could have been done by setting the Restrictions that can hid those apps. If the backup was made with those retrictions set the the Restrictions are also restored.
    Thus, if you get it to work restore to factory settings/new iPod, not from backup                               
    You can redownload most iTunes purchases by:        
      Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store

  • I am trying to connect my Macbook pro 2010 to my Samsung HDTV using a mini display port to hdtv cable. Trying to play a slide show in IPhoto but I only get sound with no picture. Does anyone have any suggestions?

    I am trying to connect my Macbook pro 2010 to my Samsung HDTV using a mini display port to hdtv cable. Trying to play a slide show in IPhoto but I only get sound with no picture. Does anyone have any suggestions?

    I keep saying this over and over, in the hope that people who do a search will find it.  Apple cannot possibly test for or be reponsible for the bazillion combinations of adapter, cables, and TV's out there.  The only monitors that are 100% guaranteed to work with the MacBook Pro are the Cinema Displays and Thunderbolt Displays, because, they're made by Apple.  They're expensive, but they work perfectly.
    My guess is that you bought a cheap MDP to HDMI cable, or have a defective one.  From my reading of these boards over the past few months, cheap cables have a high failure rate.  And the regular priced ones have only a slightly less of one.  Try a new one.  Make sure you do not damage the Thunderbolt port.

  • I am trying to get help with WMPlayer tech support Adobe Reader cant open wmpsupport.htm files why?

    i am trying to get help with WMPlayer tech support Adobe Reader cant open wmpsupport.htm files why?

    Adobe Reader opens PDF files, nothing else.

  • Credit card Orders are getting blocked with credit check

    Hi All
    In our system, If customer's credit exposure is greater then 100 % then all the credit card orders are getting blocked with credit check even though it has valid authorization. Is this sap standard behaviour?....is there any setting that will always exclude credit card orders when it has valid authorization
    Thanks in advance for looking into this

    Hi,
    In OVA8- under document controlling- check the existing routinue 1 for orders etc., else modify as per your requirement
    Thanks
    Chidamabram

Maybe you are looking for