GH4 and h.264 MOV and FCP 7

I'm just now figuring out how to edit 1080 HD h.264 MOV files from my Panasonic GH4. I have no trouble importing them, but as soon as I put these clips into the Timeline they need rendering. After rendered all is fine. I've read on-line that FCP 7 doesn't like h.264 and that one should convert these files to ProRes. I've tried that and that works fine too.
But what I'm wondering is: what is FCP 7 doing when I import the h.264 files and it has me render them? Is this rendering converting them to ProRes ( maybe shows how little I know about rendering)? If so, is it just as easy, if not easier, to go this route, rendering only the portion of each clip I use, rather than converting all whole file to ProRes before I begin?
Thanks
John

Canada John wrote:
So, if I understand you correctly, when I rendered was I converting the H.264 file to ProRes 422?
Yes.
If so, is this actually a reasonable place and means to convert, versus using Compessor or Log and Transfer (where I admit I couldn't figure out how to convert H.264 to ProRes)
While it will do it, it certainly not a best practice procedure. You need to check each render very carefully and very the entire file when you export that the video and audio from your source files is being correctly rendered - this is mainly a sync issue, more than a quality one. It really is much better to just convert the material prior to editing.
You can look at an application like EditReady, which will bulk convert your source material to ProRes:
http://www.divergentmedia.com/editready
They have a trial download that will convert the first 60 seconds of files so you can verify the workflow.
The Panasonic GH4 offers two H.264 MOV HD 1080p settings. One is 100 bit and (IPB) GOP. The other is 200 bit and ALL-I. In both cases I was required to render. I suppose in the ALL-I case it was that though a full-frame capture it was not ProRes.
Yes, that's right. The codec did not match. Keep in mind your camera is shooting in a format optimized for acquisition with the highest quality in the smallest possible file size, and that, while great for recording, is not great for editing. That is why Apple went with ProRes. More modern editors like Final Cut Pro X and Premiere Pro rely on the the newer hardware horsepower available now to basically do this conversion in real time on the fly - so you don't need to pre-convert your files.
When I look at the Sequence Settings, besides the information I list above the Aspect Ratio says HDTV 1080i (16:9). There are options for HD (960X72) (16:9), HD (1280X1080) (16:9), HD (1440X1080) (16:9), but no option to choose something like HD 1080p.
The setting for HD 1080i is the one you want. It is appropriate for work in 1080P as well, it is not listed that way because FCP-7 was abandoned by Apple before that was added to the listing - but it is the setting to use.
If rendering is conforming my clip to the Sequence Settings could it possibly also be converting my 1080p to 1080i?
Your sequence is progressive as long as Field Dominace is set to None. If it set to Upper or Lower, then it is interlaced. I you have an editing timebase of either 24 (for film output or the web) or 23.98 (for output to video) the Field Dominance option should be grayed out as there is no interlaced standard for that framerate.
MtD

Similar Messages

  • Importing a Quicktime H.264 movie into FCP and DVD SP

    Hi,
    I am curious why when I import a Quicktime H.264.MOV file into FCP it always makes me render (just the audio) when I place it on the timeline. Also when I try to import it into DVDSP it says that it is an incompatible file.
    I know its an odd question, so don't ask me why I am doing it backwards.
    Thanks to anyone that can help!
    Gary

    Hi David,
    Thanks for your help. These projects are legal video stuff and I usually pause every hour and a half for about 10 minutes. (so I can put each segment on separate DVDs) I am feeding a video signal into a stand alone DVD writer AND into my Mac (I need to make a redundant recordings in case anything goes wrong). The problem with my stand alone DVD writer is to put in accurate chapter markers is a pain. Also it has a rather bland DVD setup menu which looks poor. So basically I am trying to take a video source from my camera and have it do the compression on the fly. I want to write my DVD in DVDSP because it has a ton of formatting options, and chapter markers are much easier to place.
    Basically I am looking for the absolute quickest way to write a DVD without having to bring it into Compressor.
    Thanks again for your time!
    Gary

  • Is it normal for Compressor and FCP to analyse an imported progressive H.264 movie as interlaced?file

    I am worried my programs are corrupt, because FCP tells me my progressive H.264 file is interlaced (upper first) and Compressor analyses the same movie as bottom first. It should be progressive! Why are they not telling me it's progressive, and why both different to each other? Is it because theyn can't analyse a H.264 file correctly?! Please someone tell me what's going on!
    Thanks, Syd

    Hi Shane, thanks for replying.
    The reason I imported the H.264 movie into FCP was to add a short logo clip to the end of it, which was requested after I had exported a self-contained movie from my timeline and already started converting in Compressor... it took 60 hours to deinterlace (set to Best) and convert to H.264 all in one Batch (using only a single target...I did everything in one target, rather than chaining). I know you can't edit in H.264, but I thought adding something to the end and then re-exporting to H.264 might work...
    anyway, that's why I imported it, and then noticed that FCP analysed it as being still interlaced... So it occurred to me to check the movie Compressor had exported by importing it back into Compressor to look at what the A/V attributes tab of the inspector said... and it said there it was progressive. So now I was worried my programs were disagreeing, so I went back to square one, converted my original footage to Pro Res in Compressor, then ran that Pro Res footage through Compressor to de-interlace, then reconnected media in my FCP timeline, so that all the clips in the timeline were now progressive. Then I exported that as a self-contained movie and imported into Compressor to convert to H.264. Finally, knowing no other way to analyse the footage, and also wanting to see what FCP would make of it, I imported the movie into FCP, and found the result I put in the first post of this thread... so tried analysing in Compressor again, and found that Compressor thinks it is as I wrote in the first post above.
    So now Compressor tells me the file it previously converted to progressive isn't progressive, and thinks it has a different dominant field to the one FCP thinks it has, even though the first time I ran this movie through Compressor it analysed its own result as progressive... so I feel these incompatible analyses are possibly a symptom of something wrong?
    How can I analyse a H.264 file if neither FCP or Compressor can do it?

  • Hi guys, I've been given some .mov files to use. When I play them I can hear the audio but the pictures are green. The client says they play for him. I am on mac 10.5.8 and FCP 6.0.6. Any clues as to why this is happening?

    Hi guys,
    I've been given some .mov files to use on FCP.
    When I play them I can hear the audio but the pictures are green. The client says they play for him.
    I am on mac 10.5.8 and FCP 6.0.6.
    The files details are the same as a file that will play.
    Apple Mpeg IMX 625/50
    (50 Mbs)
    720 x 576 millions
    16-bit Integer (Little Edition)
    I've been told this happened to somebody else last week, but didn't get a resaon why.
    Any clues as to why this is happening? I suspect it's a codec issue of some sort
    Cheers,
    G

    FC 6 supports 29.97 & 25 IMX frame rates but a third party plug-in is required:
    http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/FCP6_HD_and_Broadcast_Formats.pdf
    This plug-in costs $100
    http://www.nanocosmos.de/v4/en/products/quicktimeIMX.html
    This software is cheaper at $30 and will let you test drive it for free
    http://www.pavtube.com/guide/working-with-xdcam-imx-media-in-fcp-avid-imovie-ppr o.html
    There may be a free option available but I'm not aware of it. 

  • With Premiere elements 11, when Publish/Share (saving) a finished video, selecting H.264  .mov file type, what are the recommended Codec and Aspect settings for a crisp video and a small file size?

    With Premiere Elements 11, when Publish/Share (saving) a finished video, selecting H.264  .mov file type, what are the recommended Aspect and Codec settings , for a crisp video with a small file size?

    Gary Krouse
    We will customize a very detailed reply, but
    (a) What are the properties of your source media?
    (b) What did you or the program set as the project preset to match the properties of the source media?
    (c) What specific requirements do you have for this H.264.mov export file?
    File size can be a compromise between bitrate, file size, and quality.
    Thanks.
    ATR

  • Contrast and color saturation way too heavy when viewing the movie in FCP:

    When I view the clips on the same Mac they look neutral (outside of FCP). But when I drag them into FCP (6.06) it looks like my film already has been color graded (sort of). Too much saturation and too much contrast (the blacks are pretty solid). When I export the film it looks like it did in the beginning (neutral and low contrast). How may I adjust the preview contrast and saturation in FCP to show it more neutral (or like the clips are suppose to be)?

    but why on earth is there no setting to adjust the gamma for the application itself (FCP)?
    Because it isn't designed to be used in such a manner. You can't do this with ANY EDITING APP. Not Avid, not FCP, not Premiere, not Vegas, not Media 100. NONE of them do this. They are designed to just show you what you are working with. If you want proper monitoring, you need the proper gear.
    And why is there a mismatch of gamma in the first place?
    I can only guess. And my guess is so that you can see into the shadows more, in case there is something in the frame that shouldn't be. A person, a light, C-stand...whathaveyou.
    Why could they not just have the same gamma for the finder QT and FCP?
    Again, I can only guess. I am not a programmer. Because they wanted to make sure that you can see the image on ANY computer monitor, because there are so many different types of computer monitors, settings for those monitors. Look at a computer store and all those monitors...they all look different. But again, that is only a guess.
    But would a calibrated monitor like Eizo SX2761 which is mostly for Photoshop working (stills) be good enough in a combo with for example MATROX MXO2 MINI?.
    I doubt it. It is a COMPUTER monitor, and balancing for photo work and video work is VERY differnt. If you use the Mini, you need an HDTV at least, and a GOOD one. Or the regular MXO.
    Or do I also have to buy a tv / HDTV?
    Yes...you'd need a VIDEO monitoring device, like a TV.
    And can you please recommend a decent HDTV (
    A good PANASONIC model will work.
    Shane

  • Can FCP recognize Canon EOS 550D H.264 mov files?

    I had recorded some interesting fragments with my Canon EOS 550D and wanted to edit the vides before share with my friends. After downloaded the H.264 mov videos from Canon 550D to Mac hard disk, and imported them to FCP for editing, But  the FCP can not recognize the files.I need some advices,Thanks.

    Hi,
    Theye are talking about FCP and editing Canon mov files in the following link:
       http://vimeo.com/forums/topic:26416
    The answer is still not really good but this may help. I don't use Canon cameras but the other.
    Regards.
    BH
    **Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

  • Combing Keynote, Motion and FCP. Best Strategy?

    Ok Im trying to do a project where Im using Keynote content, Motion content and FCP content.
    My final screen delivery will be on a flat screen plasma monitor with a native resolution of 852 x 480.
    I am going to be playing this back as a looping Quicktime movie from a Mac to the plasma screen. The screen will be functioning essentially as a computer monitor.
    The piece will only be about 3-4 minutes max run time.
    The video I've shot is standard DV resolution: 720 x 480.
    I am building the whole project at 852 x 480 so I dont have to scale up the video to fit the final screen size vertically.
    I was intending to piece it all together in Motion.
    (Exporting Quicktime renderings from Keynote and Final Cut at high resolution and placing them on the timeline in Motion...)
    Now, with Motion and FCP's ability to transfer files back and forth, am I using the best strategy? Should the whole thing be assembled in FCP? Or is Motion just as good for assembly.
    (I want to use Motion because I find it's interface way easier to push around than FCP and much less cryptic...)
    Is there any slicker way to bring in Keynote material than to do the exporting to Quicktime thing?
    Any advise I could get from all you motion gurus out there would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Well after actually starting in on the real construction of this project it has become very obvious it must be assembled in FCP.
    Now that I have resolved myself to that fact, I have a few issues:
    I've exported all my Keynote stuff in Animation Codec.
    Is that better than H.264? (Seemed to be slightly sharper on type edges)
    I tried setting up the sequence to have H.264 compression but it refused to accept any imports.
    I changed it back to NTSC DV Codec and it accepted to imports no prob.
    Must all FCP projects use DV codec?
    You cant tell them to use a different compression system?
    (This is one of those areas of FC that I find utterly mysterious.)
    When I bring the Keynote clips into my FCP document, they look crunchy.
    And they stumble on playback.
    Is that just temporary in the editing environment.
    The video plays back pretty clean...
    Can I get all the files to play back cleanly in FC as Im working on them?
    Will the compression used in my sequence be ignored upon export to the Final Quicktime?
    And what's the deal with the frame rates on the Keynote files.
    Even though I specified 29.97 on export, when I get info on the files theyre all over the place (20fps, 24fps...)
    Is that a problem?

  • Help with cs3 and fcp -from cs2 and fcp thread..

    didnt want to hijack the thread about cs2 and fcp so started a new one
    hi, I'm using a proRes 422 file (  mov ) 1920x1080p 23.98fps 16:9. Loads and plays fine in CS3 (custom  desktop settings)...but wouldn't mind knowing your project settings for  your trial shooternz...so I can compare...
    My file is dark and a little  flat...so I used levels effect adjustments.  However, though it looks  way better and exports OK ( hdtv 1920x1080p 24fps) I do see some "noise"  now if I freeze the frame...is that common or am I over doing it on the  gamma and levels correction ?
    I'm just doing hd for the first time really  on this machine, trying to figure out what I need in future for machine  and upgrade to CS5...so I am going to dissect this file and figure this  out til the cows come home so I don't have to deal with problems in  future with new machine, etc.
    Another thing...I have media info on this saying  mpeg-4 ( mov wrapper) video = apcn ..audio = ipcm..
    audio  1,536kbps, 1 hz, 16bits, 3 channels, ipcm..
    However, there is no  sound on the track which loads into audio 4 when video goes on video 1.   This was shot with a boom - as I can see a boom shadow in shot during "  back to 1 "  on the set (when dolly moves back to 1 etc) .... ( sound  mixer) so it's possible there is in fact NO SOUND embedded in the video  file.  Is that common to have a soundtrack appear even if it is empty  with proRes ?
    thanks...Rod

    Wow, not too popular a subject ...this....
    Got an update from the man who sent me the prores file...and a little info re: his opinion of adobe coming from FCP...I will share it with you all...
    If you are going the Adobe route, I would highly recommend that because Premiere  CS5 is a really impressive app when it comes to working with footage and  editing.  I have recently moved over to the Adobe CS5 Suite because Final Cut is  good, but it hasn't been updated in a while....and the Mac is a really expensive  alternative to a really good PC.
    The color space for the clip I sent over  was set for Rec709 HD Colorspace which is meant for broadcast, but on a non  calibrated monitor, it will look dark.  It usually requires a gamma shift and  color treatment (since the clip is uncorrected), but it sounds like you are on  your way.
    Given the RED work flow, we always shoot raw and make the  adjustments prior to rendering.  The main reason we use the Adobe Suite is  because you can work natively with any footage in the digital work flow.....FCP  requires you to transcode everything into a Pro-Res Quicktime and you lose all  of the really granular ability to treat the footage in order to get through the  edit and color grade.
    sooo, new computer will have a broadcast monitor ( just in case one is needed )...
    I adjusted my clip by eye, plus vectorgraph etc, (levels and gamma) and it turned out fine...
    Rod

  • FCP 7 and FCP-X on same partition:  what problems are caused?

    I'm trying to figure out if the performance issues I'm having with FCP-X can be remedied, or if the problem is just buggy software.  Apparently, even a newer, faster, more powerful Mac is not the answer, as I read complaints from people with new, suped-up Mac Pros who say the software slows to a crawl.  Sounds familiar to me, but I'm on iMacs and a MacBook Pro -- all my Macs are 3-4 years old, and are from that Core 2 Duo era, not Quad Core processors.  All my Macs are maxed out at 4 GB or RAM.  So I'm certain new machines are in my future.  But judging from what some people say about their newer, faster machines, I'm not entirely convinced that it would solve the problem I'm having with FCP-X.
    There are numerous threads here reporting sluggish performance (perpetual spinning beach balls) relating to a memory leak or a problem relating to FCP-X's usage of memory (some say it happens worse in Lion).  Is that the problem?  And if it is, why hasn't Apple addressed it?
    Then there is this matter of having FCP-7 (FCP Studio) and FCP-X installed on the same partition.  Apple's "Best Practices" article clearly states that it's best to have the two applications installed on separate partitions.  Only problem (for me) is, I already had FCP-7 installed on the primary partition.  When I purchased FCP-X (the day it first became available), I hadn't read that article, so naturally, the software got installed...you guessed it...on the primary partition.  And yes, I could uninstall FCP-7 (FCP Studio), create a new partition, and then re-install it.  But I remember how long it took to install FCP Studio (about 4 hours, as I recall), so I've put off the ordeal of heading down that road.
    So I'm wondering.......
    What problems are known to occur as a result of having FCP-7 and FCP-X installed on the same partition?  Would my sluggish performance be related to this?  Or would going to the trouble of uninstalling FCP-7, re-partitioning, then re-installing FCP-7 (FCP Studio) into its own play space, only be a waste of time?
    What evidence is there that this co-install is the culprit causing sluggish performance?
    What ARE the problems that the co-install causes?  I've never heard anyone address this specifically.

    When FCP X first came out, Apple recommended keeping FCS 3 on a separate partition, so I did that.
    Recently I did a clean reinstall or Lion and installed FCS 3 as normal, followed by FCP X 10.0.3.
    During the FCP X install, FCP 7 was moved to a new folder called Final Cut Studio.
    'Studio' and FCP X now work happily on the same partition - but I have not tried opening both at the same time!
    Just now, both applications are the most stable they have ever been.
    These are my standard tips for improving performance:
    First, check the spec of your iMac against the system requirements:
    http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/specs/
    Particularly your graphics card. If it's listed here, it's not suitable:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4664
    If you are getting crashes, there is some conflict on the OS. Create a new (admin) user account on your system and use FCP X from there - if it runs a lot better, there's a conflict and a clean install would be recommended.
    Other ways to improve performance:
    Keep projects to 20 mins or less. If you have a long project, work on 20 min sections then paste these into a final project for export.
    Create Optimised media - most camera native files are highly compressed and need a great deal of processor power to play back - particularly if you add titles, filters or effects. ProRes 422 takes up much more hard drive space but is very lightly compressed. It edits and plays back superbly.
    Hide Waveforms at all times when you don't need them (both in Browser and Storyline / Timeline). They take up a lot of processor power.
    Create folders in the Project and Events libraries and put any projects you are not working on currently, in those folders. This will help a lot.
    Move your Projects and Events to an external HD (make sure it's formatted OS Extended - with journaled on or off) and run from there.
    Contrary to what Ian said above, the biggest single improvement I saw in performance was when I upgraded the RAM from 8 GB to 16.
    Andy

  • Working with Motion and FCP 6

    I have some footage of a presenter reading the news and i need to know the best way to create a lower third caption in Motion and incorporating it into my movie in FCP.
    So far i have created my lower third caption in Motion and then saved it as a template, when in FCP i then open the template and drag it into the timeline, but it was trial and error getting the lower third to position at the right place on the footage.
    Is there a better way ? should i edit my footage then export to motion and creae the lower third over the footage ?
    Help
    Hillster

    Do not worry, while you gain more experience in editing and motion graphics this non-issue will gradually disappear.
    However, there are several things you can try within FCP, one is to toggle on Image+Wireframe (FCP main menu>view) and swiftly reposition your lower third as you wish in the canvas by dragging the image center.
    g.

  • Best way to work between Motion and FCP

    I use Motion on occasion but always seem to run into a problem when I export projects to .mov files and import into FCP as the same. The files always show up in FCP but if I return back to Motion to edit the Motion Project I get an alert that say that file is in use. Should I just import the whole .motn file into and FCP and render after or is there a better way? Any ideas would be helpful.

    Hi Buck,
    if you export your motion project as a mov file you create an independent file with properties selected prior export. That file becomes independent from all applications and will remain even if you delete the project it originated from. On the contrary, if you import a Motion Project into FCP it will always depend on and reference its native editor.
    If you are using a previously exported mov file within both Motion (say you re-imported it, apply changes and try to save it with same name) and FCP at the same time then you may get the warning that the file is in use.
    Any change you make in Motion to your .motn project should update within FCP timeline instantly.
    Luca

  • Is there something very wrong with Lion and Fcp x or what?

    I have just spent a very frustrating two weeks editing a one hour fifteen minute project on FCP X with Lion as the operating system. Every edit session has been plagued with crashes. My mac is a 21.2 inch, with an I7 processor and 12gig of ram which I bought the middle of this year. I had set my computer up with two partitions, one with Lion and the other with Snow leopard. This morning, in an effort to improve the terrible instability of FCP X under Lion I decided to try it under Snow Leopard......What an unbelievable difference.....I've been editing for the last three hours now throwing all kinds of clips and effects and so forth at the timeline and have not experienced one crash. What is going on here? How can Lion and FCP X be so incompatible?

    dpcam1 wrote:
    I have just spent a very frustrating two weeks editing a one hour fifteen minute project on FCP X with Lion as the operating system.
    You don't mention whether this one hour and fifteen minutes long project consisted of just one FCP X project when you experienced problems with FCP X and Lion?
    You also don't mention how long the project was that you edited successfully with Snow Leopard. If, as I suspect, this was a very short 'test' project, that would make sense. FCP X does not cope well with long projects.
    I use Lion exclusively but I keep my projects to a maximum of 30 minutes (preferably no more than 20 mins). If the total programme is longer, I make create several FCP X projects - each being a 'chapter' of the main programme. When finished, I make compound clips of all the 'chapters' then I paste them into a new (full length) project.
    I'm not pretending FCP X is perfect, but for me at least, it's very workable as long as you understand it's weaknesses. I have 16 GB RAM and since I upgraded from the 8 GB I had previously, it's made a huge difference.
    If you are getting crashes, there is some conflict on the OS. Create a new (admin) user account on your system and use FCP X from there - if it runs a lot better, there's a conflict and a clean install would be recommended.
    Other ways to improve performance:
    Create optimised media.
    Hide Waveforms at all times when you don't need them (both in Browser and Storyline / Timeline). They take up a lot of processor power.
    Create folders in the Project library and put any projects you are not working on currently, in there. (Twirl it closed to hide them).
    Move your Projects and Events to an external HD (make sure it's formatted OS Extended - with journaled on or off) and run from there.
    Andy

  • Working in Motion and FCP

    I have some footage of a presenter reading the news and i need to know the best way to create a lower third caption in Motion and incorporating it into my movie in FCP.
    So far i have created my lower third caption in Motion and then saved it as a template, when in FCP i then open the template and drag it into the timeline, but it was trial and error getting the lower third to position at the right place on the footage.
    Is there a better way ? should i edit my footage then export to motion and creae the lower third over the footage ?
    Help
    Hillster

    I would suggest using one of the many pre-produced lower third templates in LiveType.
    They are all in the standard lower third position and can be modified. Just save a the file and it's an .ipr file that yu import into FCP.
    Open in editor if you need to change it. Save it with a different name where you have different talent.
    Opps, I just realized I inadvertently answered a Motion post and not a FCP post. Certainly one of the Motion Gurus will have a better Motion solution, but this one is viable nonetheless
    Message was edited by: D Gilmore

  • Can FCP 7 and FCP X be installed on the same volume?

    can FCP 7 and FCP X be installed on the same volume?

    Yes. When you download FCPX it moves the older suite of applications into a folder call Final Cut Studio.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP OfficeJet 6500A all in one Printer . No European size envelopes apart from C6 on the printer.

    We have the OfficeJet 6500A All In One Printer. It is on a network to two computers one using Windows Vista and the other Windows7. It seems strange that the only size of envelope for the European Market is a C6. There is no facility for customising

  • Tip for Mail users regarding attaching files (icon view)

    defaults write com.apple.mail DisableInlineAttachmentViewing -bool yes Say bye-bye to *inline attachment view* once and for all!

  • Two frames open

    hi, i have got a problem with a program i am developing, i have got a JFrame and one of the buttons opens up another JFrame. the problem i am having is that the second window does not open properly. The panel shows but all the information on it is ab

  • Log4j within an abstract class error

    I'm trying to build/implement my first abstract class. When I attempt to run it I get the following error. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/log4j/Logger at BBSDDE.<clinit>(BBSDDE.java:91) BBSDDE is the abstract cl

  • OK button does not work in SharePoint 2010 using any web browser

    We are unable to press OK in SharePoint when trying to edit columns or create new columns. We can press cancel but when you click OK it does nothing. I receive an error message in the left corner which says 'helperFrm' is null or not an object. Maybe