Google search displays strange characters before search, firefox 3.6.7, ubuntu 10.04

I get these strange characters when I go to Google search using Firefox 3.6.7 and Ubuntu 10.04.......see below
ᎢᏳᏍᏗ ᎨᏒ ᎣᏲᎲᎢᎠᏑᏰᏍᏗ ᏳᏍᏗ ᎠᏁᎵᏔᏅ (These characters are on the Google search page before I search and below search bar.
strange characters below:
ᎾᏍᎩᏯᎢ Directory ᏚᎾᏓᏡᎬ
What is going on....It reads OK using Chromium. I can't read anything. I am using Firefox 3.6.7. My View....character encoding is set to :
Western(ISO-8859-1) and auto detect "on"
== ?

Just to update this topic if anyone else has the issue. I've fixed it by manually amending the following setting in about:config -
Preference name: intl.accept_languages
Value: en-gb, en
If you're in the US you'd use ''en-us, en'' instead.
I then re-ran Firefox Sync and now on the Windows machines this value shows up as User Defined instead of default and this is now kept when syncing (I'm assuming the default values are not included when syncing preferences, for obvious reasons).

Similar Messages

Adobe Reader displaying strange characters

Hello! I am writing my uni task. For that I downloaded a .pdf document from my university, which has text boxes for me to fill in. I do not know how/with which program this file was created. I first tried dealing with it using the Windows 8 Reader app. Several times, when I switched from the document to the Desktop and back, all my text was converted into strange characters. I started saving the document before switching, and this seemed to solve the problem at first. But then at some point I saved and closed it, and when I opened it the next time, only the box I modified last (with an essay) was converted into strange characters. When I copy it somewhere, the text does not appear. I tried opening the thing with Adobe Reader. It does not convert anything into weird symbols, but the ones from the previous time remain. Is there any way I can get the information back?
Here's the whole 'strange character' bit:
ý«†z´y,o/>§™I$2ž|‘M¥8"Žb2;¸[áÔeìb⁄æÉ÷×˛ÝµßScÄ−¹<¹˚ëÞG+VW5²!1°%ZÔ;‘ƒÀ¤|ªł.W‚nb·Ü`ø}=†mû⁄À¦• ¸ßÁºþÜ”ãØˇÂ²ÑrŸ–)·ô†+Ù˘¬ì¶4<Àqc.®ªSG”˛¹„+ö:@€‚Å˝å²M«ÚŸ/E¼¿ﬂüUÌÈü…qªÉ³pÉ2ôù$fiÍævﬂÓrîsƒr6@_ 8Í¾¢DîuAÑ˙Ô¨ÿ,s<“Ñ·Üä™ŸtàZ,Ö½¨#ee˚˛üBwê!MŠU¸Ÿ€¹*øƒN‰×{hø?;Ô·Î'k$;Í÷Qýw~&—ł„Aå”MTì¹⁄¿tË@˘/J ÿóS˝
ý_l'Di
õ#J³ß0O8Á@žöÃfB%Ôî{
Ûõz8Á&Â´ØëU^¤mDèüV½â~žË@ØÀ*Ý−›D‘–l@šTÁ–U-§þR˘
çU ió¦(fH€RBRK%nÁ0þ$½Œ‰¢@˛x§{±'QRÕéKÅµ«uÌ2>åÎ‚úëoNH¢-c|d‰AOÓÎgS×eGzł⁄Dd¢&łEyþ•½w;;"÷+B‰
Á ‹rn+8‰|JeÐ˙Š6Âî÷;x^¯~j⁄TÓa¦O˙qé=:*v¬à^!·þá¡®SL=Ìáh)¬øxthj™ŽÁ–½…¬Ü‚łþ ÇÌÌ„¶"KÉ4$ô‰'š−°íŽùÜÑHÜ>o¶y%˛U(Í÷f–wøÙ±⁄[¢ý [Å‚Œ‘ß?˛−dÄ¹–ï4¾&ôzÚÃSåÁ¡Ëä¡¡DG¡ŁøO7øã|ò‹áï…Q³Ê;˚@w|¤C¡¨ÝôÏŽ´ÎgÙ¿ö—‡óÊ—F¼ñ}¢¡ù¹ê˜Š˜Û›·«íÿ `QùÐ¶×g”˛Ï;–úÍ‹OU'†ah„y’‹èa´ŸÏ°èwP×ƒ—‚
üp˝qŸ±æŸøŒ¼ýìł˝‡u‚dSf0ùÉ\FŽ˛¤mW;ôÍ¤äühUÙv˛˛¯aˆý1Ø`âÇ˝òX>&
éÝßŠÉ‰Ë›>á–·ÈýùÒ…ªŁ =ﬁ‡llv¸èøÜ÷~ûº÷0ﬂÁMndejŽf-&°H.¥æµÁ⁄'¤zJÚª6•ç9¿öÝd-iðcÐöz›
»}g¤ł)4¡PŽXüª¤ÌT«¦Èl©œºG£§3êêH˜-]ûß˝%ëÐh›WÔ˘˜B–Ùî!)CÃäÁ?P–»˝Û¥¬|T‰ÆÈà⁄A*(é2QÓJx™K?ÔöGwìŒÝz HèÓT•²‹ÿf~SzúúDQ]ü“¥‘ﬁtú¸E_afN"³~/ﬂõ˘§˚Þ§²UÉùtN&º¬tÆ#uzMP=<÷û‹˜¸ù−HùS>šˆ]1]¨—˜ÖhÌŁ\°rv˘þ
‚ãÓ»¬‘ŽVÏ°ÕL0H90chÃM®yb¶§J•V"çµÅ/”€Ðk⁄iÑNÚhd@£|ös‚÷Þ‚´k§)äoıÃLöÒ5Éº°›îEÀ‚Ä–ç±]êš§ýE›=q¸÷ÿü žDe¾xüı¡:&˚B¢‰jÈMö6»ł¬6 /å•‚ÚÿÊ Ó±t'ùTã“µëS
~J[DÜiîœ[þpéjDævø@ÊäsßŽÈØïÅàUÛÏwå&¼t−©•ır
—õ¹íOòê¤¥²`÷LZKrd€J6ÄÎÛÅ−|W0Nš¸@…r«qt’liÑÃ§ÌY’æÙ!“Sâ<†Æh‡z|4Aš*£ﬂ˜ôñsÁÊ˜l±W²
ï¦ncïŒ‹Ó,»ÒùYµÛ™'T©Ì727˝^2?rNË˚Ç¡¿¢+ßu–H2e¸©CB#˚ÁºƒâÇÅÖK−"2ÍiŸRO0 ›^"˛"−âÉ×íôòCBí[îˆ¨aõãÑ,¶^³Nh–S¨íï?Øł9r\¦7
kg‚Á¤0?t Éà(Ô$>x·k(™Š°µ˘Xòþ÷£−»á€IâyòLl3DõËò0TËÌåk–ﬁ¶åA3Õ¨gˇÿüf‘±yùÈ{¦›—šÃ§®ãI;ûwhÈ˜4ZUdv-y‚t|jrÆÛ +/ÞŁ(kł¬<¡e:˙O[Ê'–6ö¨M¦«ïæÈž§$4Nœ9Ú¢½òìóvàﬂ˜÷§Ñﬂgd¦³N³í[´Ì%Q5r˜Ýl
ÛpXøïåwü—Ö²¯ê⁄ûiıÎÖ„&´ø¥º¾¬(m‘iAŽéü_œé°&LøÊhÚü³œcÞ÷hR™ÌIª3U7áõüXT¡`s¥˚“ˇÂŽ
Î@ÔrÞ+dµ˝LA>]t;pˆZ×˘—Øi'çÞŠ¿
kª"~ýl5ﬁ,ÿ6uP&‹ã+‚¨(Ì¯K_è“å$ÍÁº#F¤Ö¦ø˝ÿµuX6_−
Ëp¼Me‹¿ùöÖ°bS<¯¥P©ú½éÀ
î e½íšND¿“N®”Z(ß(j%;=Há–®† A.ﬂ*
9Ï−²È§™,ÐS2AÒÀ!ÇÜMRœê‰G£þÜàOB˙_⁄˚7‡¶»²j÷ÅÚe½*x¢˝¸‚©nSŸ!ÃùGtÕP7&ł½R7(ýñ‹ÿAæ¦?|uÐWƒ˜¯¬BHj`êf Ì]3Ýßäîe˛
qË}óÉSŁ¢S“†#å*‹3I@†®ï#eVç>0×sI›åRþPuÙ'sèf§È'™BVÍµƒ˘vÅ¢ùÁÍu/¬A¬3`¶¥ô*®ŽùÕ”£‡a7ˇlˇoÜ−
zÂÏBÁËmC˘ß×z{#lﬂ⁄õmł?íTM¥u¸š\L†áFı!-½šÀ‚ž¦AÅŽdZqê‰)Iü"˘š™ÑØ¸¸<Šıv¢U',)åX#−ßÅ\YƒÿŒ¶¥}ÏÄÚ£ØÍ ökC›fìÇ‡¶u÷¹öØêX9XWtùã,š"ÓxòÇô„¼N!ó:[ªˆ³ï•Łõ±^çx#Î´sLe¤bYÂ‡#Y×¸©åFÌîlËCdàåºT-)K¸È>H9”Ñå|nå $ﬁ°ûÄ$å4k’#˚r›Äîæ²è§ﬁ:ZJEëä´ ý‘byŠ+w
þz“Ç
Éúñõ˘iMS¦C˘¸«.¶ÄµÚž431üPÐ¥{yŽó¯*O
+ºiÝ7'òM€Fzä^GçÖºJ²™#E⁄Øwý˘P0-\»ˆêvhÇªœ>Ð˘m˝íÜëŸG½#«?ÊÕeqIñ¬c`e
[ŁHD˘W‘»˝žŸûøJÍŽ+UVÿGJ²îs~ƒ´õc”{úoL‹
3„XŁ?`•ïâ—ıaDJ?¥cå2)Ï8^žVA"?MÀ0z±¼ä[°CwP%µ™8;kŠ/IÍ:2/_kNË˚Žþ"Ö²äÕºÒg£WjÆd$ÄMÑõe•;?ò[hÏ+PD˚ à×Ã“ô¦¨àÚÄN†YPcÐ«)#×ÈÔÙL˜7]ë%PÞÏ:p2ªıÚô;ﬂ·¤˘íBŒP¬q_öx¤‡d™ﬂÐ¹zCŽ7ÿbò×iqó ´!ø¡Šzh¯1Úr„£ı˛A1>=/õ#wã®ˆ
üqß]‚˘a¤óßäUÌå*[:/@†yóBÀ˙ŸÒtx1®PŒ!Ïóc?›‰‚ÉÀkt[§m§a7z¾ˇö¤¥ë/è€1˛,JlQ…¼S;h(§f~@RÐ,ûÈ(−ön.Hq« ÍØ−¶ÞÁNØÔ_T”êDœwü˚Û.²\>—NŽr(Q¡OÌ¿¬?-kÓDO!ps˚¹Š?¥«T¦¾ø:õ+¬!˚G−×&¡pãÅ°-|Ê??ŁÂèÇžÉÄ¢m¥\a˛ME5c Q_&Ÿ.#/ÊKq:’HZb%\Òµ3ÀÌv˜stÆé@Í¤Cžzjú4Þ¢f ðH'g6¯¨ßËžÿ®tŸ}4:h\$‚lå3E_.¨%Ùx3FxGJF†ı˘~GþłûZ@P¦é9ÓÉi€çÊ ›µÖÔZúO~Ì×Ð–;vÔáwQÖ1Ãì⁄†ÿ>i˚“ò0þ(ÖıƒN)xæA§©¾

The document: https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/71fb561e-78a2-44ae-8bd6-9df6520e9d1b
The box I was talking about is the very last one.
The Adobe ReaderI started using recently is version XI; the one I used when I started editing the document was Windows 8 Reader app by Microsoft, version 6.2.8516.0.

Mac Mail is displaying strange characters

My Mac Mail is displaying these strange characters on a number of seemingly random emails from people. However, when I copy the message and paste it into a word document or the internet browser address bar it converts these "letter A in a box" characters into what the words actually were. But this is a hassle and I'd rather just be able to read the text directly in my mail application... Thanks for the help.. hopefully it is a simple fix.
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a127/bleed0black/Screenshot2012-07-20at115951A M.png

You're very welcome.
That's a very common problem
Glad you're all sorted now.

Mail displaying strange characters

Hello
I was previously using Thunderbird, but when I saw how nice Mail is, I switched over. Now I am starting to rethink, because it's displaying some very strange characters without reason. What could be the cause of this? Here is a screenshot (I blurred out people's names): <img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v297/davidjohn/miscellaneous/Picture2.pn g" border="0"</a>
MacBook Mac OS X (10.4.8)

You're very welcome.
That's a very common problem
Glad you're all sorted now.

JNI: printf displays strange characters

Hi,
i'm tryng to understand how JNI works...
I've writen a simple class in Java and i'm trying to pass a variable to a native method ...
This is my java class
public class Encrypt {
     static {
          System.loadLibrary("endecrypt");
     public native void encRec(byte[] p1);
     private static void encryptFile() {
          String p1 = "12345678";
          new Encrypt().encRec(p1.getBytes());
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          encryptFile();
}This is the native C method
#include <jni.h>
#include <stdio.h>
     JNIEXPORT jint JNICALL Java_Encrypt_encRec(JNIEnv *jenv, jobject jobj, jbyteArray p1) {
          jboolean isCopy = 0;
          unsigned char *pwd1;
          pwd1 = (unsigned char *)(*jenv)->GetByteArrayElements(jenv, p1, &isCopy);
          printf("[log - ENCRYPT]...........");printf("\n");
          printf("[log - pwd1] "); printf(pwd1);printf("\n");
          (*jenv)->ReleaseByteArrayElements(jenv, p1, pwd1, 0);
          return 0;
     }and this is my bat file
javac Encrypt.java
javah -o encrypt_jni.h Encrypt
cl -IC:\j2sdk1.4.2_05\include -IC:\j2sdk1.4.2_05\include\win32 -LD Encrypt.c -Feendecrypt.dll
java Encrypt
pause                                                                                             when i run it the result i get is:
[log - ENCRYPT]...........
[log - pwd1] 12345678@☻☻The question is: What are the strage characters at the end of the password? What am i doing wrong?

Your original byte array just contained the characters "12345678" and
you were just lucky that there was an ASCII NUL (one ell) character
in the vicinity before the entire thing dumped core against you.
Using C, a string is defined as a bunch of ASCII characters terminated
by a NULL (one ell, all bits zero) character. Java uses a different approach:
a byte array knows what its length is. The decision is up to you: supply
a NUL byte to the C stuff for convenience or use the supplied length
from the byte array when you're in the C part of the JNI barrier.
kind regards,
Jos

After upgrading to the newest Firefox, the default search engines disappeared from my search bar. Why and how do I correct this? (Also: every time I download a Google search add-on, it goes away upon closing/re-opening FF)

I'm referring, of course, to the search bar located next to the URL window; prior to upgrading to the newest FF, I had the capability of choosing from several standard engines and never experienced any problems but following the upgrade, there are no engines available to choose from and I have only been able to find versions of Google search other than the standard one in the available Add-ons I am shown when I go to 'add new search engine' (as there are no engines displayed) via the 'manage search engines' drop down option.
Furthermore, I have downloaded a search engine Add-on numerous times (most often, if not always, Informative Google Search) and it functions just fine, but upon FF restart, its back to having no default engines to choose from.
I have searched Google forever looking for an answer to why this is happening and had no luck with my specific problem, so I've come to where I figured the most savvy FF users dwell - hope you guys got some insight cause it's really pissing me off at this point, hahahaha.

See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_search_or_add_new_engines
Try to delete search.sqlite and search.json in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder]

Issue with displaying international characters returned by Search And Promote.

Hi,
     I am trying to display international characters being returned by Search and Promote. The actual text returned by S&P is televisión, while the one being displayed is televisiÃ³n
I am usging r.get() to fetch values returned by S&P. The issue is only with data returned by S&P. Local international texts are being properly displayed.
Thanks in advance!

Thanks Sham! Found the fix. I am checking for invalid characters in the byte stream and then applying corresponding encoding.
This method checks for invalid characters.
public static boolean isValidUTF8( byte[] input ) {
    CharsetDecoder cs = Charset.forName("UTF-8").newDecoder();
    try {
        cs.decode(ByteBuffer.wrap(input));
        return true;
    catch(CharacterCodingException e){
        return false;
This statement performs corresponding encoding.
String utf8 = new String(inputString.getBytes(encoded format), Charset.forName("UTF-8"));

How do get rid of the google search box when I first open Firefox?

How do get rid of the google search box when I first open Firefox?

Firefox 4 and later versions use a new build-in home page named <b>about:home</b> with a Google search bar on it.
That about:home page only shows some snippets and has a button to restore the previous session if applicable.
If you want a home page with extras then set another page as the home page like www.google.com as used in Firefox 3 versions.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page
See also:
*Tools > Options > General > Startup: "When Firefox Starts": "Show my home page" "Show a blank page"

I can't get to google recently on my computer, neither with firefox, what is this a search engine blockade virus?

recently for two weeks now
i can't open google
have firefox, try to open google or ask something on the google bar
i can't get no connection
is this on my computer and how do i get this deblocked?
i think a specific program to block google search engine is on my computer

I assume Google toolbar extension is not compatible with Firefox 5.
You can try this extension to override compatibility issues,
* https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/

I get a message asking me if I want to change my default search engine to Yahoo! Search each time I open Firefox. How do I disable this annoying message?

For the past few days, each time I open Firefox on my home computer, a popup message is briefly displayed: "Your browser's default search engine is not set to Yahoo! Search. Would you like to set it now? (Yes/No)". After perhaps 15 seconds at most, the popup disappears and my home page appears as normal. I have the Yahoo! Toolbar installed, and Yahoo! Search is the search engine there; however, the search box on the address bar (which allows me to select from several search engines) is normally set to Google. The search engine in the address bar hasn't actually been changed to Yahoo! Search without my consent yet -- I'm just annoyed at getting nagged to change search engines every time I open Firefox. How do I get the "nag" messages to shut up & leave me alone?
I would also note that this is only happening on my home computer (which runs Windows 7), not on my work computer (which runs Windows XP, and which I also normally use Firefox as my browser on, with the same Yahoo! Toolbar + Google search in the address bar setup).
I have run Threat Scans with Malwarebytes (paid version) and a Quick Scan with Avast! (free version), and neither has eliminated this "nag" message from Yahoo! Search.

You can check for recently installed suspicious or unknown extensions.
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem.
*Switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Adding extra fields to the Product search display

Hi all,
I have a requirement where the std Product search needs to be modified wherein i need to add a price field for some materials whcih i will maintain in a Z table(custom table for the materials and its price).
Now my problem is that the o/p structure is taking the fields from the view BBPV_F4PR_GEN (where i dont have nay price field!)...When i pass my structure to the Dispaly FM "F4UT_RESULTS_MAP" it doesnt consider my custom structure for display....
is it possible to change the o/p structure for the Product search display???Has anybody tried thsi before???
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks & regards,
Disha.

AFAIK, the only way to do this is to write a system modifcation.
The BADI is executed only once at startup of the session, so that makes it merely static. (A strange point in time, I discussed it with SAP and they just shook their heads)
I had the same problem with some other F4-Helps and it was a big hazzle. From my experience, no straight answer.

Bitdefender Search Advisor doen't work with Firefox 25.0.1

My PC runs Windows 7 Home Edition 64-bit, and my antivirus software is the latest Bitdefender Total Security. I use Firefox browser and I make extensive use of Bitdefender Search Advisor. Firefox regularly updates itself and is currently v25.0.1. Bitdefender Search Advisor was working happily in this updated Firefox. Now however I have reinstalled Windows on a fresh clean hard drive, and with it I have installed the latest Firefox 25.0.1 directly from the Firefox website. It is therefore a clean up-to-date Firefox that has not been updated. Bitdefender Search Advisor will not work in this, even though it previously worked happily in my older Firefox that had self-updated to v25.0.1. Search Advisor still works well in the latest Internet Explorer and Google Chrome, so I don't think the problem lies with Bitdefender. I suspect that a remnant of an older Firefox installation still remains after a Firefox update and is needed to help Search Advisor run. The remnant isn't there with a clean install of the latest Firefox. All this is just a guess of course. I don't want to revert to an older version and let it self-update. Is there any way to make a cleanly installed latest version of Firefox work with Bitdefender Search Advisor? Does anyone know what is going on?

Here is the information that you requested. I should add that when I was using Bitdefender Search Advisor successfully with the old Firefox that had been self-updated to v25.0.1 I also had McAfee Site Advisor running and the two were perfectly happy to run together. I have tried disabling McAfee Site Advisor in my new Firefox installation but it does not help. In addition the problem that I have was spotted after Firefox and Bitdefender had been installed but BEFORE Site Advisor had been installed, so Site Advisor is not part of the problem.
Here is the requested data.
Application Basics
Name: Firefox
Version: 25.0.1
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0
Extensions
Name: BetterPrivacy
Version: 1.68
Enabled: true
ID: {d40f5e7b-d2cf-4856-b441-cc613eeffbe3}
Name: McAfee SiteAdvisor
Version: 3.6.4
Enabled: true
ID: {4ED1F68A-5463-4931-9384-8FFF5ED91D92}
Name: Bitdefender Wallet
Version: 1.0
Enabled: false
ID: [email protected]
Important Modified Preferences
browser.cache.disk.capacity: 358400
browser.cache.disk.smart_size.first_run: false
browser.cache.disk.smart_size.use_old_max: false
browser.cache.disk.smart_size_cached_value: 358400
browser.places.smartBookmarksVersion: 4
browser.sessionstore.upgradeBackup.latestBuildID: 20131112160018
browser.startup.homepage: http://www.google.co.uk
browser.startup.homepage_override.buildID: 20131112160018
browser.startup.homepage_override.mstone: 25.0.1
dom.mozApps.used: true
extensions.lastAppVersion: 25.0.1
gfx.direct3d.last_used_feature_level_idx: 1
network.cookie.prefsMigrated: true
places.database.lastMaintenance: 1386340621
places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages: 104858
plugin.disable_full_page_plugin_for_types: application/pdf
plugin.importedState: true
plugin.state.npmcffplg: 2
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_bgcolor: false
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_bgimages: false
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_colorspace:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_command:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_downloadfonts: false
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_duplex: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_edge_bottom: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_edge_left: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_edge_right: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_edge_top: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_evenpages: true
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_footercenter:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_footerleft: &PT
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_footerright: &D
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_headercenter:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_headerleft: &T
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_headerright: &U
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_in_color: true
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_margin_bottom: 0.5
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_margin_left: 0.5
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_margin_right: 0.5
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_margin_top: 0.5
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_oddpages: true
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_orientation: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_page_delay: 50
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_data: 9
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_height: 11.00
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_name:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_size_type: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_size_unit: 1
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_paper_width: 8.50
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_plex_name:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_resolution: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_resolution_name:
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_reversed: false
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_scaling: 1.00
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_shrink_to_fit: true
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_to_file: false
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_unwriteable_margin_bottom: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_unwriteable_margin_left: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_unwriteable_margin_right: 0
print.printer_Canon_Inkjet_iP5200.print_unwriteable_margin_top: 0
privacy.sanitize.migrateFx3Prefs: true
Graphics
Adapter Description: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Adapter Drivers: nvd3dumx,nvwgf2umx,nvwgf2umx nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Adapter RAM: 512
Device ID: 0x06e4
Direct2D Enabled: true
DirectWrite Enabled: true (6.2.9200.16492)
Driver Date: 10-23-2013
Driver Version: 9.18.13.3165
GPU #2 Active: false
GPU Accelerated Windows: 1/1 Direct3D 10
Vendor ID: 0x10de
WebGL Renderer: Google Inc. -- ANGLE (NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Direct3D9Ex vs_3_0 ps_3_0)
windowLayerManagerRemote: false
AzureCanvasBackend: direct2d
AzureContentBackend: direct2d
AzureFallbackCanvasBackend: cairo
AzureSkiaAccelerated: 0
JavaScript
Incremental GC: true
Accessibility
Activated: false
Prevent Accessibility: 0
Library Versions
NSPR
Expected minimum version: 4.10.2
Version in use: 4.10.2
NSS
Expected minimum version: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
Version in use: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
NSSSMIME
Expected minimum version: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
Version in use: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
NSSSSL
Expected minimum version: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
Version in use: 3.15.3 Basic ECC
NSSUTIL
Expected minimum version: 3.15.3
Version in use: 3.15.3

Google search keeps reverting to previous search terms. Help?

I recently switched to Safari after Firefox became unusable. It's all good, 'cept I've found this problem with Google. After I make several searches in a row, when I click in the search bar, the text in there, and the results, revert back to the search-before-last. I hope that makes sense. Say for example I search for "Apple", then my brain changes direction and I search for "car hire". I decide I need to be more specific, and click in the search bar in order to add a location, and I just get sent back to my original search for "Apple". It's deeply irritating.
I have turned off autofill and restarted Safari.
Any advice. or failing that, sympathy, please? Thanks.

I think I see an error in Google's javascript handle for Safari Clients:
if(b!=a)d.href= google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=party+balloons&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sei=c3 dOT973JtDlggeto_DBAg&gbv= +b};
maybeRedirectForGBV(document,location,"2");window.rwt=function(a,f,g,l,m,h,c,n,i ){return true};
---you can see on the first line where it says "party+balloons" , that was what I had typed in my browser search box in safari (located in the upper corner of the browser window).
basically what it is doing is comparing the contents of what is in the main google webpage search text box to the contents of what is in the browser searchbox. if they do not equal eachother then it redirects to whatever is in the browser text box.
here is the scenrio. you go to the google website. you search for "maps" and a bunch of results come up. you still want to keep looking, but this time you instead choose to search using Safari's Search box. Instead of looking up "maps" you decide to look up "Geography." it shows a lot of results for Geography.
You then decide to search again on the main Google Search box (on the webpage) for "Vacation."
Google compares the two searchboxs' contents "Vacation" to "Geography" . they don't match up...so Google decides that the Browser searchbox (which still contains the old search keyword "Geography") takes precedence over it's own main website's searchbox (which is very goofy) and redirects to the results for "Geography" instead of the new search "Vacation."
Because this javascript on Google is specified for only Safari Clients....this is why this doesn't happen when you search Google using Firefox. So, it's not Apple's fault.

Displaying the count of search result?

Hi,
We have built new search pages for our client to search for candidates registering in their iRecruitment site. The client prefers to see the no of records of each search result. Typically some searches may fetch around 50000 records.
How to achieve this. Currently we have set the VO_MAX_FETCH_SIZE for one responsibility as 50000. I think this will have a performance impact and it cannot display the exact count if it is > 50000. Is there any other way just to show the count of search records?
thanks,
Hem

Henry,
As Ram insisted before that if no. of records in your VO is more than max fetch size set in profile option, then it won't return excat number of records.You can very well use this method in normal flow, if you expect that your VO query will not return more than max fetch size records.
Otherwise run a separate query to get total, as discussed.
--Mukul

Strange behavior when searching a phrase using reg exp and dynamic sql

Hi,
I have a strange issue while using dynamic sql for an apex page. I have a requirement to search a string in the database column which is entered by user on a page item. The search process should search the whole phrase only.
I have a query generated dynamically in the back end and use it in a cursor in the stored procedure
SELECT t.group_cn , t.group_desc, t.group_type, t.partner_organization_id, t.partner_organization
FROM vr_idm_group t WHERE regexp_like(t.group_desc,'(^|\W)HR Selection & Assignment(\W|$)', 'i')The pl sql code with the dynamic sql statements are below.
   IF p_search_process NOT in ('PARTNER') THEN
      OPEN v_cursor FOR v_sql;
   ELSE
      OPEN v_cursor FOR v_sql USING p_search_id;
   END IF;
   LOOP
      FETCH v_cursor INTo v_obj.group_cn, v_obj.group_desc, v_obj.group_type, v_obj.partner_organization_id,
         v_obj.partner_organization, v_obj.match_count;
      EXIT WHEN v_cursor%NOTFOUND ;
      v_search_array.extend;
      v_search_array(v_search_array.last) := v_obj;
      dbms_output.put_line(v_sql);
   END LOOP;The search works fine if the search string does not contain any special character like &,- etc.
However, if the search string contains any special character, it does not return any thing. This strange issue happens only if I call the procedure from the apex page and the search string contains a special character. (please note that the procedure works fine even from apex if the string does not have a special character). When I debugged this, found that, the cursor does not fetch any rows (it is supposed to fetch two rows) for unknown reason. When I run the query separately, it returns the two rows (in which the column group_desc contains the search string "HR Selection & Assignment") as desired. Also, when I test the procedure in the back end (PLSQL developer), it works fine.
Any idea, what is causing this strange behaviour?
Advance thanks.
Regards,
Natarajan

i don't see anything about a dataProvider. you're assigning a source for a scrollpane. scrollpane's don't have a dataProvider property.
anyway, other than arrayRun always being false when that last if-statement executes, what's the problem? doesn't that movieclip display when that 2nd branch of the last if-statement executes (assuming instance is defined correctly etc)?

Google search displays strange characters before search, firefox 3.6.7, ubuntu 10.04

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for