GR invoice verification field should not be mandatory in PO

Dear Experts,
When we are creating Service PO, at that time we require the GR invoice verification field (Under Invoice Tab) should not be mandatory but other POu2019s it should be mandatory.
Please suggest solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Guys!
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought external service purchasing with GR (service entry acceptance) but without GR-based IV was impossible. This is a standard SAP check that can't be overridden in any BAdI. So either you give up SES and enter the invoices without any reference or make the invoices refer to the SES!
I see that there's some option to allow ESM orders without the GR flag, but then at least the service-based IV flag shall be set. The option is in IMG for MM -> External Services Management -> Source Determination and Default Values -> for Client. Look at the bottom of the screen for the flag "Service item: IR before GR allowed". Unfortunately this flag is not visible in my 6.0 system, but in a EhP4 system it is.
But still - some kind of reference in the IR you will need anyway - SES in this case. Or give-up entering SES at all (remove the flag "GR" in the PO).
BR
Raf

Similar Messages

Purchase org. field entry should not be Mandatory for PR creation/release

Dear Experts,
When we are creating PR (ME51N), Purchase organization field entry is mandatory for few user id & in few user id this field is not mandatory. While we are creating PR by which user id, where purchase org. field entry is not mandatory (not fill purchase org. field) & release PR (ME54N) than system ask purchase org no.
Purchase organization field entry should not be mandatory for us when we are creating & release the PR for all user ID's. How can be maintain this things on all user ID's.
Please help us regarding this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Hi dear,
Do the following settings in SPRO,
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE DOCUMENT TYPES.
Here check the Field selection Key for your document type.
Now go to
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE SCREEN LAYOUT AT DOCUMENT LEVEL
Now double click on the field selection key which you have found earlier and now double click on Reference data,item and set the indocator as optional for Purchasing Organisation key.

Field should not display in the subtotal row in ALV report after sorting .

we have a requirement, after sorting and subtotaling, the output in ALV is -
vbeln        amount1 amount2 amount3
123           11              12            13
123           12             13             14
123           23             25             27
133           11              12            13
133           12             13             14
133           23             25             27
Now the customer wants the ALV outpput in this fashion -
123           11              12            13
123           12             13             14
                 23             25             27    --->123 (vbeln) should not come in subtotaling row
133           11              12            13
133           12             13             14
                  23             25             27--->133(vbeln) should not come in subtotaling row

Hi,
if it helps you could create a hierachy. In this way you can define the field catalog for the lines and for the subtotal columns. The only thing is that you would always show the subtotal rows.
You have references of hierachy alvs in
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c060fcb4-2c62-2b10-d2b2-f32407a5cc6f
ALV Hierarchy
alv hierarchy
In this case it also sorts
Sorting for ALV hierarchy
I hope it helps.
Edited by: Oscar Pecharroman on Aug 2, 2010 1:13 PM

SOME FIELDS SHOULD NOT SHOWN IN THE REPORT

Hi,
this is to inform you that, there is a requriment in reporting perspective (ALV),
Requriment:
i have to generate a ALV report which is viewed by our CFO with one t.code, in that report suppose there are 10 fields.
That is a specific report if some body apart from my CFO uses the same tcode to generate the same report than it has to display only 5 fields.
if my CFO uses the same t.code all the 10 fields must be visible.
please help me how to do it.
regards,
balajia.

There are couple of ways to achieve this,
1) - Create 2 variants, 1 variant for CFO with all the fields & 2nd variant with only relevant fields. Then use the authorization concept, where basis can restrict the access / execution of the report with specific variants.
From the basis view, they create role & assign this variants in one of the object ( not sure). Basis assistance required
2) - When developing report, write the validation for the respective fields such as maintain Customize table in which maintain userID's & fields which they can access. Display only those fields to the userID who executes this report. It should check this customize table for this UserID & only those fields listed should get displayed. ( for all the fields, instead maintaining each field, you can enter "ALL",
Eg: UserID -
Fields
CFO -
ALL ( report should display all the fields)
NONCFO-------Field1 | Field2 | Field3 | Field4 | Field5 ( only these fields should get displayed)
Note: In Customize table either you can maintain with User ID or Role. It will be more convinient in future as well.
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Net price field should not be edited in PO, when created reff. to contract

Dear friends,
I have a requirement like this.....
User referring the contract in creating the purchase order, details of the contracts are copied in to the purchase order. the price field is in edit mode....
requirement is that user should not edit this field, the price carried from the contract should be not edit mode. this is to be hapen only when purchase order is created referrence of contract.
here we are using only the standard document type is used for creating Purchase orders with and without the referrence of contract.
Thanks in advance...
Shashidhar

What I did for a client was implementing enhancement (user exit) MM06E005 to perform checking during PO creation.
OSS note 310154 explains how to issue error messages from ME21N from the user exit.

Query..for Field should not accept the manual entry

i wann query for remarks Field in JE It should Not accept the manual entry it should accept only sys drop data.
Thanks & Regards
yogi

For this field level authorization, you may only use SDK or SP to reach your goal. SP would be difficult to use in this case.
Thanks,
Gordon

Field should not display when it is null

Hi,
I am creating a xml report,I dont want to display row when its value is 0.
eg column1 column2 column3 column4 column4
1 ABC BCA 0 0 0
2 XYZ YXZ 0 1 0
So if 1 is not having any value then that row should not display,it should dispaly only row with values as in 2.
Thanks in Advance....

Instead of <?for-each:G_CF_SUB_SEG_VALUE?>
use
<?for-each:G_CF_SUB_SEG_VALUE[TOTAL_CUST_AMT!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B0!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B2!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B3!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B4!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B5!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B6!=0]?>

Business Area field should not get translate while doing allocations in co

Dear All,
In ecc 6.0 when we will be allocating expenses through assessment and Distribution the system credits sender cost center and debits receiver cost center,the same will be applicable for Business Area also.
But my client is having plant =business area for which they are making financial statements business area wise.
The client wants its business area not to get affected by above allocations ,Is there any method of restricting costs to remain in same business area and not getting translated to another business area.
Example :                    cost center           profit center           business area
expenses                      1011                   1001                     101
allocation from cctr to cctr 1012 which is having pctr 1002 and business area 102
expenses                      1012                   1002                       102
So my requirement is the system should not update business area 102
Thanks and regards
vijay

Hi Vijay,
Profit Center is derived basing on Assignments. If you have assigned a Profit Center in the Cost Center Master
Data, obviously for whatever the postings that take place in that Cost Center, will be posted to Profit Center also
(Statistical).
In your case, Cost Center 1011 and 1012 have been assigned to different Profit Centers 1001 and 1002. So,
conceptually what the system is doing is correct.
You want to restrict the postings to happen to Business Areas. I suggest you, this is not problem of
stopping/restricting the transaction postings but You have to restructre your Cost Centers and Profit Centers.
It's rather a Business Process / Structure change required than technical requirement in the system by restricting
the postings.
Pls revert back for further discussion...
Srikanth Munnaluri

AR Invoice Commission field is not available in XL Reporter

Hello All,
I am trying to create a commission report in XL Reporter.
I have a 'Commission %' field in INV1 table of SAP B1 (AR invoice) which is not available when I try to pick it up from the formula builder in XL Reporter.
It is not a User-Defined Field, so my understanding was it should be in the Sales - A/R section of Formula Builder along with the other A/R Invoice line items. However, it is not there...
I was wondering if there is a way to add it to the list?
Thank you!

The following is a FMS query we use to select the part no from a row and put it to a UDF.
Select
$[$38.1.0]
The number 38 refers to the item no when looking at the system information (use View>System information) for the field you want to select.
Use this query (updated to reflect the commission field item no) and link it to a FMS on the UDF you have created.

Alert-fields should not be empty

Hi,
I am using Oracle forms 10g,
My question is...
in form.. If i left some required items empty... when I press submit button then it should display alert message these fields(like empno,ename,sal,..) are empty....
please fill these items....
help me...
Thanks,
Shankar

I tried this on EMP table.... Is it correct???????????
I write this code in WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED
declare
alrt varchar2(20);
alrt2 varchar2(120);
begin
alrt2:='Enter These items'||chr(13)||chr(10);
if :emp.deptno is null then
alrt2:='Department number'||chr(13)||chr(10);
end if;
if :emp.ename is null then
alrt2:=alrt2||'ename'||chr(13)||chr(10);
end if;
if :emp.sal is null then
alrt2:=alrt2||'salary'||chr(13)||chr(10);
end if;
if :dept.deptno is not null and :emp.ename is not null and :emp.sal is not null then
commit;
else
set_alert_property('NULL',alert_message_text,alrt2);
alrt:= show_alert('NULL');
end if;
end;
# Chr(10) returns a linefeed character
# Chr(13) returns a carriage return character
Other wise help me try to reduce the code.....
Thanks & Regards,
Shankar.

Input field should not be case sensitive

experts help
1)I have declared selection field in module pool as maktx of type maktx.
when ever the user enter the data into into , it is comming in caps but i want as it is the data entered by user in the program I dont want it to convert it caps by default .Please tell how to handle
2) I have a 2 radio buttons declared and made it as a group,
When user selects one radio button then that particular filed input should be allowed to enter if he selects another radio button then field 2 should be allowed to input.
I am displaying as
radiobutton1 field1 inputbox1
radiobutton2 field2 inputbox2
By default one shoule be active . is using screen modify statement will help . Should it be coded in PBO and PAI.
3)IN intial screen i will have a push button and when i press it then it will call another screen and there i will have another push button say back.
Rigth now when the user press back button in second screen i have writeen leave program.
But I want it to go back to previous screen.
call screen 'earlier screen' should be used or leave to screen 'earlier screen'.
or any other best method.
Thank you for the replies

1) in screen painter maintain the input field attributes "Upper/lower case entry" (or use a correct DDIC reference)
2) in PBO you will have a LOOK AT SCREEN/MODIFY/ENDLOOP, also i suggest add a Function Code so checking/un-checking the radio-buttons will trigger PAI immediately, but in PAI ignore this function code to stay on current dynpro.
3) To go back to previous dynpro, use a LEAVE TO SCREEN 0, so program closes the current dynpro and continues with the statement following the CALL SCREEN. (Another CALL SCREEN will add one screen to the stack, til maximum number reached, when program will dump out.)
NB: Try to use the search tool, most of those questions have already been answered (many times)
Regards,
Raymond

Vendor field should not display when GI is done in MB1A?

Hi guys ,
i have a report programe here i am pulling all the material data and purhasing order info in the background using the BADIO MB_DOCUMENT BADI. here i am writing my logic. this BADI is triggering once material Documnet is created in MIGO MB1A,MB1B,MB1C . when i am trying to excute the MIGO tranasaction all the data shoulb be displayed . when I am trying to excute MB1A Here i dont need one field like Vendor Number ? can any one please help me on these ?
Thanks In Advance.

Instead of <?for-each:G_CF_SUB_SEG_VALUE?>
use
<?for-each:G_CF_SUB_SEG_VALUE[TOTAL_CUST_AMT!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B0!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B2!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B3!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B4!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B5!=0 or TOTAL_CUST_B6!=0]?>

Invoice verification- duty elements not picking up- cancellation

Dear Pandits,
I have two issues.
In one material PO which has got ED, cess , Scess, Tax. - J1iex is posted, GR is done, J1ieX is captured
In MIR7 , the simulation screen shows the total value one is credit and one is for debit ( without showing the duties and taxes elements)
Secondly I have wrongly, saved this document, how to cancel the same .
thanks
v balajee

Gud morning,
Now I have got some inputs.
PO history says-
101-    5000001257    dt.29.5.09 17:23:15 hrs
102-    5000001258 - dt.29.5.09 17:35:14 hrs
101-    5000001259-   dt.29.5.09 17:37:40 hrs
( however all the above entries are posted with prior date of 16.4.2009)
As for excise entries concerned , J1iex shows
Part II at header level posted on 16.4.2009
part I details at footer level shows
Regiser      mat.doc.        type    ind.         EI quan      Status          entry date          time
RG 23A      5000001257     101     Receipt     1,600     Created     16.04.2009     17:23:18
RG 23A      5000001258     102     Issue             1,600     Created     29.05.2009     17:35:16
RG 23A    5000001259      101     Receipt     1,600     Created     16.04.2009     17:37:40
it shows that part I and part II posting has been done on 16.4.2009 and GR 101 is done on 29.5.2009.
subsequently, GR has been cancelled (102) on the same date and a new GR 101 is done on the same day.
now my doubts are
When a GR is cancelled, what will happen to excise entries?
Will they have to be cancelled. In this case, excise has been posted already prior to GR which will not allow to cancel the entries I suppose.
Goods are under QI stock.
kindly help to resolve the impasse
thanks
B Athithya

"Indicator: GR-Based Invoice Verification" direct input Upld PO LSMW

Hi, Im using lsmw direct input method. I am uploading the PO. But the GR Based invoice verification field was not checked ON. Im trying this using USER_EXIT in enhancement MM06E005, with EXIT_SAPMM06E_017.
Any body can tell me how i can check ON the field WEBRE( GR based invoice verification) while creating the PO through LSWM.
regards
RAJ

Hi,
How you solved, kindly explain
Also explain how to upload PO through LSMW in the case of multiple line items for single PO?
Thanks & Regards
Ravi

Invoice verification price not equal to GR document price

Hi: everyone
Purchase order price has been changed after goods receipt. according to my underdtanding, invoice verification price should be equal to GR price if this is IV of based GR. However, when I deal with invoice verification, sap system proposed price equal to PO price. why?
everyone can provide me answer?
Thank you
Henry

Hi
Once the GR has made if you ammend the PO price or change the Tax code the value will not flow to Miro, bcs at the time of GR the value based on the Qty will be captured. Simple logic
Reverse the GR ammend the PO again make a new GR and do the IV.
Regards

GR invoice verification field should not be mandatory in PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for