Purchase org. field entry should not be Mandatory for PR creation/release

Dear Experts,
When we are creating PR (ME51N), Purchase organization field entry is mandatory for few user id & in few user id this field is not mandatory. While we are creating PR by which user id, where purchase org. field entry is not mandatory (not fill purchase org. field) & release PR (ME54N) than system ask purchase org no.
Purchase organization field entry should not be mandatory for us when we are creating & release the PR for all user ID's. How can be maintain this things on all user ID's.
Please help us regarding this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Hi dear,
Do the following settings in SPRO,
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE DOCUMENT TYPES.
Here check the Field selection Key for your document type.
Now go to
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE SCREEN LAYOUT AT DOCUMENT LEVEL
Now double click on the field selection key which you have found earlier and now double click on Reference data,item and set the indocator as optional for Purchasing Organisation key.

Similar Messages

GR invoice verification field should not be mandatory in PO

Dear Experts,
When we are creating Service PO, at that time we require the GR invoice verification field (Under Invoice Tab) should not be mandatory but other POu2019s it should be mandatory.
Please suggest solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Guys!
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought external service purchasing with GR (service entry acceptance) but without GR-based IV was impossible. This is a standard SAP check that can't be overridden in any BAdI. So either you give up SES and enter the invoices without any reference or make the invoices refer to the SES!
I see that there's some option to allow ESM orders without the GR flag, but then at least the service-based IV flag shall be set. The option is in IMG for MM -> External Services Management -> Source Determination and Default Values -> for Client. Look at the bottom of the screen for the flag "Service item: IR before GR allowed". Unfortunately this flag is not visible in my 6.0 system, but in a EhP4 system it is.
But still - some kind of reference in the IR you will need anyway - SES in this case. Or give-up entering SES at all (remove the flag "GR" in the PO).
BR
Raf

Purchase Order item wise should not be DELEATED once GRN/IR is done

HI All,
HERE is ISSUE,
Purchase order is Created which consist of two line items 10 and 20 .
now aganist the PO item 10 GRN/IR is done their by purchase history gets generated.
In std SAP these type of item can be deleated but the user wants that these type of Items in purchase order should not be deleated for which PURCHASE order history is generated.
And their should be an error or warning message when ever the user try for deleating the Item.
So Can any one guide how to proceed?
solution is very URGENTLY needed.
Regards,
Rajashekhar

Hi,
You can ask your ABAPer to write a piece of code in the enhancement MEVME001 in such a way that he has to check the EKBE(History per Purchasing Document) table for the entries by passing the PO & PO line item number, if the entries are present then the error deletion of the item cannot be done.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

HOW WE CAN VALIDATE A FIELD THAT SHOULD NOT BE SPECIAL CHARACTER?

HOW WE CAN VALIDATE A FIELD THAT SHOULD NOT BE SPECIAL CHARACTER?

data : v_abcde like sy-abcde,
v_num like '0123456789',
v_data(60) type c.
start-of-selection.
v_abcde = sy-abcde.
concatenate v_abcde v_num into v_data.
if ur field co v_data
else.
message.
endif.

PR derelease should not be allowed after PO creation

Dear Friends
I have created a PR, released , then PO is created with reference to PR. After that I came back to me54n and cancel the PR release. As per our Business Practice it should not allow to cancel the PR release after PO creation.
I have maintained message 06 076/06 400 and 06 608 as error message.
The changeability indicator is also maintained as '1' against the release indicator'2'.
I don't want to go for any Badi implementation or user exit. Is there any solution in standard SAP
Thanking you
Tapan

Even I tried this testing but it seems like not working. I this is standard SAp behaviour.
Check this OSS notes 493900
1. Question :
Why can I modify a purchase requisition although I set the changeability of
the release indicator to '1' ('Cannot be changed')?
Answer :
The purchase requisition is not modifiable via a purchasing transaction
like ME52 or ME52N. But it is possible to change the purchase requisition
from any other external application like sales order, planned order,
maintenance order or network.
The Changeability functionality only concerns the purchasing transactions.
This is intended and a new release strategy determination takes place if
there is a modification of the data in the external application.
But logically why the user is cancelling the PR after PO creation? Even if they cancel the PR it doesnt impact the PO which is already created. Even if they cancel and re release the PR and try to create a new PO, system wont allow you to create new PO stating that PR is already ordered. Even though it looks strange but it doesnt harm the procurement.

The server farm account should not be used for other services

I have created a new SharePoint Foundation 2013 Farm. I only used the Farm Configuration Wizard to create the Search Service Application, all other aspects of the Farm was created using PowerShell.
The SharePoint Health Analyzer is reporting the following error:
Title: The server farm account should not be used for other services.
Severity: 1 - Error
Category: Security
Explanation: DOMAIN\FARM_ACCOUNT, the account used for the SharePoint timer service and the central administration site, is highly privileged and should not be used for any other services on any machines in the server farm. The following services were
found to use this account: Distributed Cache Service(Windows Service)
Remedy: Browse to
http://centraladminsite:port/_admin/FarmCredentialManagement.aspx and change the account used for the services listed in the explanation. For more information about this rule, see "http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=142685".
Now I understand how to change the account used to run the Distributed Cache Service, but my query is what account should I use in the least privelage model? I have setup the following 6 accounts as per TechNet guidelines (Link)
and am not sure if one of these accounts should be used or if another account is required:
SQL Server service account
Setup user account
Server farm account
SharePoint Server Search service account
Default content access account
Application pool identity
After reviewing the TechNet article again, I don't fully understand the section titled "Service application accounts". Is the article advising me to create a seperate account for each row in the table? e.g. 1 account for Business Data Connectivity
Service, a different account for "Application Discovery and Load Balancer Service", another account for "App management" and another account for "Distributed Cache", so 4 extra accounts if I choose to install all of these services
within the Farm?
Also, what does the article mean when it says "Plan one set of an application pool and proxy group for each service application that you plan to implement."? How do I go about doing this?
Kevin Evans

After reviewing the TechNet article again, I don't fully understand the section titled "Service application accounts". Is the article advising me to create a seperate account for each row in the table? e.g. 1 account for Business Data Connectivity Service,
a different account for "Application Discovery and Load Balancer Service", another account for "App management" and another account for "Distributed Cache", so 4 extra accounts if I choose to install all of these services within the Farm?
Inder: Yes, It is suggested to have multiple service account for each service application. This increases security and dependencyof 1 account on multiple Service applications. Like below
SQL Server service
Local System account (default)
Setup user
Member of the Administrators group on the local computer
Server farm
Network Service (default)
No manual configuration is necessary.
SharePoint Server Search Service
By default, this account runs as the Local System account.
If you want to crawl remote content by changing the default content access account or by using crawl rules, change this to a domain user account. If you do not change this account to a domain user account, you cannot change the default content access account
to a domain user account or add crawl rules to crawl this content. This restriction is designed to prevent elevation of privilege for any other process running as the Local System account.
Default Content Access
No manual configuration is necessary if this account is only crawling local farm content. If you want to crawl remote content by using crawl rules, change this to a domain user account, and apply the requirements listed for a server farm.
Content Access
Same requirement as the default content access account.
Profile import Default Access
Same requirements as server farm.
Excel Services Unattended Service
Must be a domain user account.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263445%28v=office.15%29.aspx
Also, what does the article mean when it says "Plan one set of an application pool and proxy group for each service application that you plan to implement."? How do I go about doing this?
Inder: Each service account has a application pool and you can plan to use same application pool for multiple
service accounts if required. These application pool are then consumed by proxy connection
of each service application. On service application pool, you can see all the service applications and its proxy connection.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Zero quantity should not be allowed for STO delivery

Hi,
     zero quantity should not be allowed for STO delivery.
     when i create a delivery for a STO it should not allow zero quantity
     can someone throw some light.
Alec

Hi,
Please maintain the "B - Create Delivery with qty greater than Zero" in Part.dlv./item in shipping tab page of the customer of site.
more briefly: in WB02 --> click on the customer of the site --> Shipping Tab page --> Maintain B (Create Delivery with qty greater than Zero)
Regards,
Srini

ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object

Hi
I was trying to shrink table to reset the high water mark but some unknown reason it failed.
Please help me
SQL> declare
stmt varchar2(100);
cursor cur is
select object_name from user_objects where substr(object_name,1,1)='A'
and object_type='TABLE';
begin
for i in cur loop
stmt :='alter table '||i.object_name ||' shrink space';
execute immediate stmt;
end loop;
END;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object
ORA-06512: at line 9
Regards
Jewel

http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_3001.htm#CJA
The shrink clause lets you manually shrink space in a table, index-organized table or its overflow segment, index, partition, subpartition, LOB segment, materialized view, or materialized view log. This clause is valid only for segments in tablespaces with automatic segment management. By default, Oracle Database compacts the segment, adjusts the high water mark, and releases the recuperated space immediately.
Compacting the segment requires row movement. Therefore, you must enable row movement for the object you want to shrink before specifying this clause. Further, if your application has any rowid-based triggers, you should disable them before issuing this clause.

Pharma: shelf life with remaining 4 months should not be considered for planning

Hi,
Implementation in Pharma : FG Shelf life with remaining 4 months should not be considered for FG planning.
How to exclude this stock while planning for FG. FG planning is Make to stock.
BR
Subbu.

Hi,
Thanks to Caetano, Kumar & Mani..
We have achieved this with below with customized program....
Exclude those batches from MRP run whose difference between the (expiration date &
current date ) is less than or equal to its procurement time mention in MRP-2
view of material master.
Before running MRP, one need to execute the program with following option:
Input data will be plant, material type or list of material:
   System should execute following logic:
1) In a plant list all material with given material type
2) Execute the BAPI for find out the characteristic value of EXB_MRP from class
type 001of material class (BAPI_OBJCL_GETDETAIL_KEY)
3) If EXB_MRP = Y , then list out all such material.
4) For such a material identity those batches which are available in stock other
than ‘9999’
5) All such batches characteristic of shelf life expiry date need to be derived
from BAPI
6) Calculate ( Expiry Date - Today’s Date)
= Difference
PLIFZ ), batch of
the material will be transferred to the 9999 storage location which will be
excluded from MRP run.
PLIFZ ), batch of the material will be transferred
to the 9999 storage location which will be excluded from MRP run.
   7) Run the MRP on materials
   8) Transfer posting from 9999 storage location to original storage location :
Selection criteria
   On execution transfer the material back to required storage location.
BR
Subbu.

RESERVED QUANTITY'S SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

Dear Gurus,
Reserved quantity's should not be considered for Transfer postings to subcontractor or Stock transfers.
Example: Material XYZ Total Stock = 1200 nos.

as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
Try with abap development.

RESERVATION QUANTITY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

Dear Gurus,
Reservation Quantity should not be considered for Stock Transfers or Transfer postings to Sub contractor.
movement type : 541 & 641
Example : Total Stock = 1200 nos. Reserved stock for production order = 1000 nos.
Currently our system allows stock transfers/transfer postings for reserved quantity also.
But we want the reserved quantity to be blocked and only free stock should be allowed for transfer postings.
(i.e 1200 - 1000 = 200 nos . Only 200 nos should be allowed for transfer postings)
Please suggest.

as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
Try with abap development.

Info record and source list mandatory for PO creation?

Hi Gurus,
Client wants to make Info record and source list mandatory for PO creation?
If Inforec and source list not available for that material, then user can't able to create PO.
How can I achieve this requirement?
Any user exit available?
pls help..

Hi ,
SproMM-Purchasing -Source ListDefine Source List Requirement at Plant Level
If u mark the indicator then the Source list is mandatory for all the materials procured.
If u want for a speciic material , mark it in purchasing view of Material Master.
Inorder to create a source list , inforecord is mandatory -- this is by default Standard SAP .
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Is the note 335065 valid for 7.01 release

I see that this note is valif for sap_appl upto release 6.40. We are on 7.01. Is this valid for us and can we make changes accordin to this note?
Thanks,
Kiran

My biggest gripe is with the artwork. In version 6 if I attached a high resolution image it would store it and display it that way. When I imported one in 7.0 it reduced it to a low resolution image that didn't look good over more than an inch or so square.
I don't have or want an iTunes account so I usually get 300x300 to 500x500 images from Google Images or Amazon. They look like 50x50 after I import them.
When I saw that I just went back to 6.0 whatever it is.

Input field - entry is not in the list of values

Hi
I have a very strange thing going on in my aPP.
I use an input field to which I attach an on Enter event.
When user presses 'Enter', a pop up window appears with the list of countries.
Selecting a country automatically puts this country into the input field. So far so good.
The problem, however, I am experiencing is in a situation where the user enters a valid value into the input field
without pressing 'Enter' and then continues pressing other buttons in the app. What happens is that the web dynpro framework immediately throws an exception saying the value is not in the set of accepted values.
I do not understand why the system throws such an exception if no set of values has yet been attached to the input field (by ImodifiableValueSet for example).
Any idea?
Thank you
yuval peery

Hi
1. In comp controller in wdDoInit I get the list of countries and write them to a local node.
2. This node is mapped to a view in a different window.
3. When I press enter, a pop up window is created. The values mapped from the comp controller to this view are presented to
the user in a nice table.
4. When the user selects a line in the table, the method writes back the value to my input field.
Quite straight forward.
The problem is that when the user enters a valid name into the input field before even pressing "Enter" the framework
returns "entry is not in the set of values".
Frustrating.
regards
yuval

Purchase Requisition Attachement Should not be Modified when it is released

Hi Experts,
I've a requirement that, In ME52N, if the Purchase Requisition is Released then, the user should not add or delete or change the Attachments. Pl help me in this how to do.
Regards
Rajiv.

Thanks giri.
For the following reasons, the billing documents are not released to accounting.
1. If the user wrongly chosen the billing type for the delivery.
2. After creating condition type, it has to be assigned in COPA. If we forgot to do it, billing doc will not released.
Our requirement is that if the billing document is not able create accounting document, the billing document itself should not be generated.
Hope this will be suffice to understand my issue and suggest a suitable solution.
Points will be rewarded.
Regards,
Kumar.

Purchase org. field entry should not be Mandatory for PR creation/release

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for