GRC 10 - Risk Analysis in legacy system

Hi everybody,
I have a problem with legacy connectors in GRC 10. I implemented the note 1594963. So, I created the legacy files and storage it in GRC server.
When I run the user synch, the legacy connector only synch the first record.
Someone can help me? Someone did implement a risk analysis for legacy systems?
Regards,

Hi  Claudio Ekel
Can you share some inputs on the Legacy Risk Analysis.
We have configured the Legacy Connector as per the note 1594963 ; Placed the files on the server & tried running Synchronization Jobs. But the data is not getting uploaded to GRC10 .
We made sure that text files are in UTF-8 format
Is it mandatory to load all the 11 files that are provided in the note 1594963? We have excluded the Profile related files
Can you share a sample of Legacy file formats that you have used for the sync.
Can you throw some light on what could be the possible issues for data not getting uplaoded to GRC10?
Regards,
Pavan Muthyala

Similar Messages

  • Batch risk analysis over cross system

    Hi,
    I have the folllowing problems with batch risk analysis over cross system group (SP14) when I run the batch risk job over this group of connector:
    - The number of users analyzed are wrong in reports.
    - The last update date are wrong in reports.
    - The reports shows some risks with locked and expired users. For example I have 3 connector in a group and user A is not locked in connector 1 but locked in 2 and 3. The reports shows this A user in all the connectors included in the cross system.
    Does anyone have a similar scenario? How resolve it? Any tip is welcome.
    Kind regards,

    Hi,
    SAP solved my problems with the following notes:
    -1988650 - GRC 10.0: user analyzed for single & cross connector and SAP_ALL profile disappear for cross system in ad-hoc risk analysis.
    - 2028860 - AC10.0 GRACMGRISKD table shows riskid for riskcount zero
    Regards,

  • Risk analysis failed: ExceptionInvalid System

    Hi Gurus,
    When I am doing risk analysis in CUP for work flow request I am getting following error"Risk analysis failed: ExceptionInvalid System"
    And system log is as follows"
    011-12-18 15:52:02,729 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_2] ERROR
    com.virsa.ae.service.messaging.MessageNotFoundException: Code: '9940', Locale: 'en'
    com.virsa.ae.service.messaging.MessageNotFoundException: Code: '9940', Locale: 'en'
         at com.virsa.ae.service.messaging.MessageFormatter.formatAsText
    (MessageFormatter.java:103)
         at com.virsa.ae.search.po.RequestHistoryPO.getDisplayString(RequestHistoryPO.java:112)
         at jsp_show_audit_info1323336819278._jspService
    (jsp_show_audit_info1323336819278.java:110)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:112)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:566)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:190)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.include
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:509)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.PageContextImpl.include
    (PageContextImpl.java:163)
         at jsp_request_review1323336807965._jspService(jsp_request_review1323336807965.java:703)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:112)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:566)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:190)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.PageContextImpl.forward
    (PageContextImpl.java:199)
         at jsp_request_review_controller1323336806543._jspService
    (jsp_request_review_controller1323336806543.java:18)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:112)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:566)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.JSPServlet.service
    (JSPServlet.java:190)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
         at com.virsa.ae.commons.utils.framework.servlet.AEFrameworkServlet.service
    (AEFrameworkServlet.java:461)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward
    (RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
         at com.virsa.ae.commons.utils.framework.servlet.AEFrameworkServlet.service
    (AEFrameworkServlet.java:461)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet
    (HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest
    (HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet
    (RequestAnalizer.java:386)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet
    (RequestAnalizer.java:364)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer
    (RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle
    (RequestAnalizer.java:265)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
         at
    com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process
    (ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
         at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:102)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:172)
    Thanks,
    Nayana

    Hi,
    Have you already checked this thread??
    Error on calling RAR from CUP
    Cheers,
    Diego.

  • SOD Analysis on Legacy Systems (Microsoft Dynamics-Navision

    Hello Everyone
    SAP GRC 5.3 provides an option to run Risk analysis on various non-sap based legacy platforms. However, does it include Microsoft Dynamics-Navision systems ?
    Can anyone please provide information on it. Thanks
    Thanks & Regards
    Dinesh Nair

    Dinesh,
       GRC RAR can work with any legacy application in offline mode. Here is the whitepaper on how to achieve this:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20a06e3f-24b6-2a10-dba0-e8174339c47c?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Regards,
    Alpesh

  • GRC 10 - Job Sync Legacy System large files

    When I run the job GRAC_REPOSITORY_OBJECT_SYNC sync with the files from the legacy system, the file "USER_PERMISSION.txt" is about the size of 231 MB, and this happening to this job sincornismo canceled, the error "TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED", the basis verified the memory allocated.
    We check the SAP note "1593704 - legacy file upload issue for large files" is already applied in SP05.
    Server: SAP GRC AC v10:
    [Config My System|http://www.2shared.com/file/rhXVfRcX/My_system.html]
    Could you help me with some information to have solved the problem.
    grateful
    Inacio

    Hello Inacio,
    I know that this is a very old post, but have you managed to solve this issue?
    I've found this note, that is included in SP10
    Note 1741277 - Repository Role sync ends with TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED
    Have you changed memory parameters in order to solve it?
    Thanks!
    Diego.

  • Risk Analysis with "ALL" systems

    Gurus,
         I have a scenario where we have a rule set (not global) built on a logical system with 8 systems in it. We are trying to run the analysis with "ALL" systems instead of individual systems as we are hoping that the analysis will be performed only on the systems that are part of the logical systems. My understanding on how the risk analysis run may be wrong but I need a second opinion on my assumption. Please do let me know if any one needs more explanation.

    Hi Varma,
    The Risk Analysis System "ALL" is really all connectors and is not tied to the Logical System (LS). The LS defines which systems are applicable for the rules. If your LS has fewer systems than all the connectors, just keep in mind that this impacts the results.
    Example:
    Existing connectors = A, B, C, D, E, F (ALL = A-F)
    LS-1 = A, B, D, F
    Run the report for "ALL" systems/connectors and lets assume that every system has SOD issues. Your results would look like this:
    A = SOD violations
    B = SOD violations
    C = "no violations found"
    D = SOD violations
    E = "no violations found"
    F = SOD violations
    You would either need to add C & E to LS-1 or create a LS-2 with connectors C & E and create/upload rules for LS-2. Then ALL would find SOD violations for connectors A - F.
    Hopefully I didn't over explain the question. Short answer is system "ALL" = all connectors and there is no choice to run the SOD report based on a specific LS.
    -Dylan

  • GRC Risk analysis reports are not checking all possible risk conflicts set up in the rule set that lead to risks.

    Dear All,
    After running the risk analysis it shows only the first conflict for a risk in the rule set (Rule ID 0001). We have already Generated SOD ruleset. Also during migration from 5.3 to AC10.1 all the rulesets were imported properly.
    What could be reason??
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Abhisshek

    Abhisshek,
    there is already a thread with the same question:  Dear all I only get result for one rule id and not with others what should be an issue?
    Regards,
    Alessandro

  • Risk Analysis in GRC 10.0

    Dear Experts,
    I have configured RAR in GRC 10.0. Sync jobs are successful. Batch risk analysis is sucessful.
    But when I tried to run a User/Role risk analysis I am not getting any result. I am not sure whether system has run risk analysis or not but I get the confirmation screen with blank result table. Please advise how to fix this issue.
    I appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Raj

    Hello Raj,
    Check the below points related to risk analysis
    1.check once the parameter id in configuration settings
    2.BC set activation
    3.while running risk analysis check backend system name and connector which is configured.

  • CUA and Risk Analysis

    We have installed GRC 5.3 AC and using it with CUA. Connector names are same as names in CUA.
    While doing Risk Analysis for user in Master system, it shows violations. For same user, when I do risk analysis in child system (which has same roles) it does not show any violations.
    Are we missing anything?
    Thanks,

    Thanks,
    I checked those notes but it talks about Analysis from CUP where as I'm currently looking into Risk Analysis from RAR only.
    I checked with another user-id with different roles but it shows violation in both Master and Child system. Wehre as earlier user-id still shows violation in Master system only even though roles are same in both systems.
    So, i suspect some of rules are not generated (i ran rule generation again).
    Is there any way to check/generate rules for particular system?

  • How to upload the data from legacy system database to SAP data base

    Hi.
    We are doing analysis of Legacy system and which needs to be converted to SAP system i.e. SAP implementation.
    I just want to know , how we migrate the existing whole data( from legacy system) into SAP system.
    and which method is the best method to use data migration from legacy to SAP system if data legacy data amount is huge.
    Please suggest me.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    We can either use the BDC or BAPI or LSMW  or Direct Input techiniques for the data transfers.
    The combination of both Session and Call transaction can be used to achieve this that includes the error handling also. This invloves the screen interaction.
    These days, BAPIs are used to overvome some upgrade problems. For easy upgradation, we cna go for BAPIs. Here ther is no screen intercation.
    LSMW mainly used for master data transfers using some standrad programs.
    As per your client or company desicions  we can choose any of them.
    Please refer to these links for more understanding -
    BDC Vs LSMW -
    BDC VS LSMW
    BDC Vs BAPI -
    BDC VS LSMW
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chandralekha.

  • AE 5.2 remote risk analysis with CC 520_640

    Hi,
    Can anyone please tell me if this scenario is possible.
    AE to do risk analysis in remote system by using CC rules defined in a central system.
    Eg. ECC system has mitigation rules defined for HR. ECC also has rules defined for Finance, MM etc
          AE 5.2 will connect to the CC (ECC system) when processing a request and check the HR rules for the  
          roles in AE to do a remote risk analysis before provisioning the access in HR box.
         ECC box has CC 520_640 - ECC 5.0
         HR box has CC 520_700  - ECC 6.0
          Is this possible at all? CC configuration parameters are enabled and defined to do a remote analysis.
          Risk analysis shows risks when a remote analysis is done in CC. But AE risk analysis shows no risks.
    Thanks

    Good question but quite confusing way to ask but anyways..
    As you said you are able to perform risk analysis in RAR/CC on the considered system (remote system as you mentioned) but not able to perform the same in CUP/AE
    from the symptoms It seems like the web service in AE for integration with CC to perform Risk Analysis is not configured.
    Please go to Configuration tab > Risk Analysis menu > Select CC version
    and enter the URL for the web service, it may be something like
    hostaddres:portno/VirsaCCRiskAnalysisService/config?wsdl&style=document
    or you can find it through following method.
    Go to Web Services Navigator (same location as for UME) and drill down to VirsaCCRiskAnalysisService and get the URL from there. Finally enter the URL on the above mention location.
    Then try performing the Risk Analysis on the considered system, if it is still not working and in case the web service is already configured and working for other systems let me know. We will think in some other direction.
    Best Regards,
    Amol Bharti

  • GRC AC 10 - risk analysis : No rules were selected

    Hi,
    In GRC AC 10, when I do a risk analysis (user level for example).
    For each userid the result shown in the column action is "No rules were selected "
    any idea ?
    Thanks
    Aurélien.

    Hi Vikas,
    Further to your comment above, I would like to point you to my thread here and specifically ask you about the following statement:...
    3. Open your GRC functions and make sure you have correct back end system updated for them. Check the status of all your GRC functions and make sure they all are active.
    I opened up the Functions from NWBC and realized that all the systems for each function were as follows:
    1. SAP Basis
    2. SAP CRM
    3. SAP ECCS
    4. SAP HR
    5. SAP R3 NON HR Basis Logical Group
    6. SAP R3
    7. Logical Group
    AND ALSO
    8. The DESCRIPTION of my RFC Connector ?!
    Now my question is as follows:
    1. Where in the Pre/Post/GRC300 documents does it say that one must configure each function with the backend system as you state above....should the configurations Connector/Connector/etc etc already mapped the functions to the backend system ?
    2. Also Why is the description of my RFC Connector available as a drop down menu from " System" tab on the function edit mode - see attached screenshot.
    Your advice would be appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Paul

  • GRC AC 10.1 - Risk Analysis: No rules were selected

    Hi All,
    I'm currently configuring the ARA module in GRC AC 10.1, and an facing this issue. When I run my User Analysis, its throwing an error message "No rules were selected'.
    As per your suggestions from discussions, i double checked all the below activities
    Activate the BC sets
    Run Sync Jobs
    Run Batch Risk Analysis
    After all this I found that the functions are not mapped to the logical groups(Back-end Systems) I have defined. Can you please let me know how to make sure you have correct back end system(logical Group) updated for the functions in the setup? Doesn't the configurations Connector/Connector Groups etc already mapped the functions to the back-end system? It would be a hell of work to do all the system mapping on function level manually.

    Hi Narsimha
    You need to map your connectors to the logical systems that are used in the function definitions
    Look at your integration framework Setup in the IMG.
    Governance, Risk and Compliance > Common Component Settings > Integration Framework > Maintain Connectors and Connection Types
    Also, for 10.1 there was an issue with logical systems. It may be that your configuration is correct: Re: GRC 10.0 SP14 - Poblems when generating rules for logical systems
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Risk analysis Report Error in GRC AC 10.0

    Dear GRC,
    I had problem with Risk analysis Report in GRC Access Request form
    When i run the Risk analysis report on Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing as "No Violations" but if i run the Risk analysis report only on Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level then report showing too many Violations.
    I maintained Action Level , Permission Level , Critical Action Level and Critical Permission Level as default risk analysis type in SPRO Configuration Parameters settings.
    i am not understanding why system behaves like this. Could you please help me on this.
    System Details : GRC AC 10.0 , SP-12
    Thanks a lot for swift response.
    Best Regards,
    RK

    Hi GRC Team,
    Please help me on this. I am waiting for your replay.
    Regards,
    KR

  • SAP GRC 10.0 ARA - Risk Analysis Job naming

    Dear all,
    Once i trigger a risk analysis in background, a job with a very strange name (serial number) is scheduled at backend. But at Business Client i put a specific naming for hits role. It could be possible to change this backends namings? It is impossible for me recognised which job is which...
    thank you in advanced,

    Hi Sara,
    please check table TASKPLAN_GRP_NAM in GRC backend system. This table lists all scheduled background jobs by ID (field TASKPLAN_GRP_ID) and job name per business client (field TASKPLAN_GRP_NAM)
    Regards,
    Markus

Maybe you are looking for