Greater Than Clause in Parition

Hi,
I need to find out why can we use greater than value clause instead of Less than clause in Oracle Partitions.
Can anyone advice me.
Cheers!!!

Nope, not according to syntax for range_values_clause
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_7002.htm#i2125922
Regards
Peter

Similar Messages

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

Greater than 4000 characters in OBIEE 11g

Dear all,
I have a table, just one column.
In Analysis, I designed a table with this column content the data as text greater than 4000 characters.
Can I show all of them in OBIEE ?
Can I change the column datatype?
Anyone help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
David,...

I guess you will have problem displying them in OBIEE since (The data type would be long);
You can not use long datatype column in below cases;
1. A value of datatype LONG was used in a function or in a DISTINCT, WHERE, CONNECT BY, GROUP BY, or ORDER BY clause. A LONG value can only be used in a SELECT clause
2. It can not be used in expressions or conditions
3. It can not be used in select lists of subqueries or queries combined by set operators
Make sure your generated query is not doing the above things. First thing Distinct will come in the obiee queries by default. Try to avoid distinct,group by,order by in your reports. Direct database request for the report can help you in this case.
Mark Correct if it helps.
Regards,
Kashi

Greater Than Less Than

Dear all,
I am Using oracle 10g R2 database on windows.
I have a doubt that,
If I have a 'Date' datatype column suppose a and want to (select Less than sysdate and greater than Sysdate-31(One Month).
e.i.
select a,b,c from T where a Less Than Sysdate-31(One month.);How can i do this.
Thanks,
Chanchal Wankhade.

Shinegar wrote:
I had not considered the effect on an index with TRUNC. Thank you for pointing that out.
TRUNC doesn't actually remove time as you can see below
SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MM:SS AM') "Today's Date and Time" from DUAL;
Today's Date and Time
01/19/2012 12:01:00 AMLet's say sysdate = Jan 19, 2012 11:00:00 AM
As shown above, trunc(sysdate) = Jan 19, 2012 12:01:00 AM
So, trunc(sysdate) -1 = Jan 18, 2012 12:01:00 AM
Removing the trunc from column a
select a,b,c
from T
where a between trunc(sysdate)-1 and trunc(sysdate);will also remove all data that is greater than Jan 19, 2012, 12:01:00 AM so you would only see data from one day -- Jan 18th.
Adding the trunc to column a returns all the data from Jan 18th and 19th.
It is my experience that users will ask for a date range, but then will ask for just one day. If Column a is not truncated, then no rows would be returned when between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(sysdate).
Most programmers will not use trunc(sysdate) in the where clause, but would use a variable with value assigned of sysdate or trunc(sysdate) as it provides more flexibility.
If you do not want to use trunc on column a, then the where clause should be BETWEEN trunc(sysdate) - 31 AND sysdate.
Edited by: Shinegar on Jan 19, 2012 12:40 PMThe trunc function does not remove the time portion, but it does set it to midnight. Or at least i would if you used the correct format mask in your TO_CHAR. The mask for minutes is MI not MM.
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM') am_pm,
2 TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE),'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') mil_time
3 from dual;
AM_PM MIL_TIME
01/19/2012 12:00:00 AM 01/19/2012 00:00:00John

Date Greater Than Operator

I am comparing two date fields from two tables. Both are in DATE format. The dates look like this: 22-Apr-2006 07:00:10 AM and 01-Jun-2007 12:00:00 AM. I am adding this statement to a WHERE clause:
and vendors.vend_obsolete_date > document_xref.acceptance_date;
In this particualr case, I should get no result because the 1st date came before the 2nd date. But when I run my program, it seems to be ignoring my > statement. Is using a greater than sign the proper syntax to compare if the 1st date field is bigger (came after) another?
Thanks!

Greater than works on DATE columns, no problem. A simple test confirms it.
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon Jul 9 17:50:52 2007
select 'oops, something is wrong' as result
from dual
where
to_date( '22-Apr-2006 07:00:10 AM', 'dd-Mon-yyyy hh12:mi:ss AM' )
> to_date( '01-Jun-2007 12:00:00 AM', 'dd-Mon-yyyy hh12:mi:ss AM' )
no rows selectedThere must be something else about your query or data that's causing the anomaly.
Joe Fuda
SQL Snippets

ROWNUM with Greater than symbol..!

Hi
Can any one explain why ">" greater than operator not working with ROWNUM.
FOR EXAMPLE:
SELECT * FROM EMP where rownum > 2;
But the less than operator is working.
SELECT * FROM EMP where rownum < 2;
Please clarify this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sathya

Hello,
" … since something like a rownumber actually doesn't exist …"I’m pretty sure the OP is referring to the pseudo-column ROWNUM, which generated automatically by the db systems, for every query. This value, starting with 1, is being attached to every record which satisfy the where clause condition. Hence, for the first record to be assigned a rownum, the where clause must consider rownum=1 as a valid condition.
" Rownum needs to be "generated" in a subquery first "I don't see any problem with the following code (with no subquery):
select * from emp
where rownum <=3;This query will display the first 3 fetched (not sorted) records from the emp table.
Regards,
Arie.

Report data showing a date 1 day greater than selection formula end date

Hi All,
   I have a report that contains the following selection:
date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= date(minimum({?Date})) and date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) <= date(maximum({?Date})) and dayofweek(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) in {?DayOfWeek} and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= time({?Start Time}) and
    time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) < time({?End Time})
When I view the report, if my date(maximum({?Date})) is 5/1/2011, the report shows data for 5/2/2011. I can't seem to figure out why my report is generating data for a date that is 1 day greater than my end date.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance,

No need to send SQL as dates are not in WHERE clause.
It someting to do with the way crystal handles datetimes
If you want to see dates up to an including 6/2/2011 if its a date time crystal will create a where caluse
Datetimefield <= 6/3/2011 00:00:00
Looks like when this is converted to date its stayin as 6/3/2011
Sorry can't think of any solutions, also I live in UK so just about to leave, hopefully some one else may be able to offer a solution.
Ian

Rownum greater than query

Hi all,
first of all, what I am aware about...
I am aware about the fact, that ROWNUM filters, inside the query which is to be filtered by rownum, are incorrect. That is this is incorrect:
select * from <table> where rownum < 20;
Also I am aware, that the following will never return a result:
select * from <table> where rownum > 20;
That is clear. The correct version of the "less than" query is:
select * from (select * from <table> order by a) where rownum < 20;
Now the question: what does the last example still not work with "greater than" queries:
Take e.g. following example:
select * from (
select * from dba_objects order by object_name
) where rownum > 5
;

I ckeck it again. It's working for me !
Any way I'll quote it.
How ROWNUM Works
ROWNUM is a pseudocolumn (not a real column) that is available in a query. ROWNUM will be assigned the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... N, where N is the number of rows in the set ROWNUM is used with. A ROWNUM value is not assigned permanently to a row (this is a common misconception). A row in a table does not have a number; you cannot ask for row 5 from a table—there is no such thing.
Also confusing to many people is when a ROWNUM value is actually assigned. A ROWNUM value is assigned to a row after it passes the predicate phase of the query but before the query does any sorting or aggregation. Also, a ROWNUM value is incremented only after it is assigned, which is why the following query will never return a row:
select *
from t
where ROWNUM > 1;
Because ROWNUM > 1 is not true for the first row, ROWNUM does not advance to 2. Hence, no ROWNUM value ever gets to be greater than 1. Consider a query with this structure:
select ..., ROWNUM
from t
where <where clause>
group by <columns>
having <having clause>
order by <columns>;
Think of it as being processed in this order:
1. The FROM/WHERE clause goes first.
2. ROWNUM is assigned and incremented to each output row from the FROM/WHERE clause.
3. SELECT is applied.
4. GROUP BY is applied.
5. HAVING is applied.
6. ORDER BY is applied.
That is why a query in the following form is almost certainly an error:
select *
from emp
where ROWNUM <= 5
order by sal desc;
The intention was most likely to get the five highest-paid people—a top-N query. What the query will return is five random records (the first five the query happens to hit), sorted by salary. The procedural pseudocode for this query is as follows:
ROWNUM = 1
for x in
( select * from emp )
loop
exit when NOT(ROWNUM <= 5)
OUTPUT record to temp
ROWNUM = ROWNUM+1
end loop
SORT TEMP
It gets the first five records and then sorts them. A query with WHERE ROWNUM = 5 or WHERE ROWNUM > 5 doesn't make sense. This is because a ROWNUM value is assigned to a row during the predicate evaluation and gets incremented only after a row passes the WHERE clause.
Here is the correct version of this query:
select *
from
( select *
from emp
order by sal desc )
where ROWNUM <= 5;
This version will sort EMP by salary descending and then return the first five records it encounters (the top-five records). As you'll see in the top-N discussion coming up shortly, Oracle Database doesn't really sort the entire result set—it is smarter than that—but conceptually that is what takes place.

How to filter results of the timedifference where great than a value

To all,
How do I filter the results of this so I only get that which is greater than 2 seconds?
Here is the query:
SELECT
A.REQUEST_UU_ID, TO_CHAR(B.CREATE_BY_TS - A.CREATE_BY_TS) AS ElapsedTime
FROM
TELLER_MESSAGE A INNER JOIN TELLER_MESSAGE B ON B.REQUEST_UU_ID = A.REQUEST_UU_ID
WHERE
A.MESSAGE_TYPE_CD LIKE '%REQ%' AND
B.MESSAGE_TYPE_CD LIKE '%REP%'
ORDER BY A.REQUEST_UU_ID
Here are the results which I want to filter to get only the one row with 3 second time difference.
99ac8695-18fb-a59d-1d6b-3d2a577fff22     +000000000 00:00:03.000000 <<<this is the one I want
99ac8696-18fb-a59d-1d6b-3d2a577fff22     +000000000 00:00:02.000000
99ac8896-18fb-a59d-1d6b-3d2a577fff22     +000000000 00:00:02.000000
I tried it without the TO_CHAR casting but that gave an error.
Thanks,
Eric

Hi, Eric,
Add this to your WHERE clause:
AND     b.create_by_ts > a.create_by_ts + INTERVAL '2' SECONDOr you could add this to the join condition.
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

Less than or greater than Decode Function

Can we use less than or greater than (relational operator) operator in decode function

Use Case instead.
Not sure if you need it in your resultset or your where clause.
Simple examples:
MHO%xe> with numbers as(
2 select 1 a, 3 b from dual union all
3 select 2 a, 3 b from dual union all
4 select 3 a, 3 b from dual union all
5 select 4 a, 3 b from dual union all
6 select 5 a, 3 b from dual
7 )
8 select 'QRY1'
9 ,      a
10 ,      b
11 from   numbers
12 where (case when a >= b then 1 end) = 1
13 union all
14 select 'QRY2'
15 ,      case when a < b then b else 0 end
16 ,      case when b < a then a else 0 end
17 from numbers;
'QRY          A          B
QRY1          3          3
QRY1          4          3
QRY1          5          3
QRY2          3          0
QRY2          3          0
QRY2          0          0
QRY2          0          4
QRY2          0          5

How to use (greater than) in web services call

Hello, I am trying to query a set of assets where the external unique ID is greater than 400,000. My existing code looks like
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'"
However, using this will return any asset record starting with a 5 or above as far as I can tell, I assume b/c it is comparing string data due to the single quotes infering data of type text (string). Is it possible to use comparison operators with numeric data correctly?
I posed this question to support and received the below answer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body> <AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/asset/"> <ListOfAsset xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/asset"> <Asset> <AssetId /> <PurchaseDate/> <OwnerAccountId /> <ExternalSystemId>> '400000'</ExternalSystemId> </Asset> </ListOfAsset> </AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
Basically, instructing me to use &gt. I'm doing coding in .NET visual studio and not using the XML as above. However, I did try the following:
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'" which returned an error in the compiler.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I would assume "external system id" is an integer, but, I will test on a custom field that I now is of type integer.
Could you take your same code and use a non-zero value for the operand? For example, could you try
objAccQryParam.ListOfAccount[0].CustomInteger0 = ">= '10'"; and let me know if that returns values that are greater than or equal to 10. Using a two digit number is important. Assuming you have data greater than 10.
Thanks!

Exchange 2010 SP2 RU2 - Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases

We have been getting intermittent SCOM alarms for our Exchange 2010 MBX server citing "Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases"
I see events in EventViewer that SCOM is triggering on, but not whats generating the events or how else to test for them.
    get-eventlog -computername SERVERNAME -logname "Application" -after "03/14/2013" | ?{$_.eventid -eq "5604"} | select MachineName,EventID,EntryType,Message | ft -autosize
One MS Forum post online says it is a bug in RU4, unclear if it may also be a bug in RU2 (our installed version).
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvradmin/thread/9dcb3011-9327-4935-9479-62b38a6ddd87
    "I was looking for the same error and found this.. it basically says that this is a bug in RU4 and RU4-v2...and it needs to be removed."
tests using troubleshooting scripts find no issues with search indexer,
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>.\Troubleshoot-CI.ps1
    Get-EventLog : No matches found
    At C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts\CITSLibrary.ps1:622 char:40
    + $msftesqlCrashes = get-eventlog <<<< -computername $Server -after $StartTime -logname "Application" -source $msftesqlServiceName | where {$_.eventId
    -eq $msftesqlCrashEventId}
        + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (:) [Get-EventLog], ArgumentException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : GetEventLogNoEntriesFound,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.GetEventLogCommand
    Name IsDeadLocked CatalogStatusArray
    SERVERNAME False {DATABASENAME\SERVERNAME, DATABASENAME\S...
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>
and tests against searches on each DB themselves show no issues and respond typically within 3 seconds.
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>Test-ExchangeSearch | ft Server, Database, ServerGuid, ResultFound, SearchTimeInSeconds, Error -AutoSize
    Server Database ServerGuid ResultFound SearchTimeInSeconds Error
    SERVERNAME DATABASENAME b16e3461-257c-40dd-a9ad-99a5f41a927e True 2.937
I also tried to check the Performance Viewer for the MSExchange Search Indexer and MXExchange Search Indices but am unsure which of the many metrics would indicate this issue.
We have had no reports of search issues from our users and have been unable to duplicate any impairment in our testing.
Does anyone else have any suggestions for tests to check or steps to take on this alert? Is it simply a false alarm or a timeout of other sorts during testing? We have 80 DAGs on this server (as well as all our servers, some of which have also reported the
same alert) and the Test-ExchangeSearch command times out before completely testing all DAGs.

Hi IAMChrisL,
Any updates?
Frank Wang
TechNet Community Support

Unit Testing - Results greater than 0

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

FileUpload using JAX-WS webservice on weblogic 10.3.5 is taking long time for files greater than 10MB

I am trying to upload a file using JAX-WS webservice which is deployed on the weblogic 10.3.5 server.Even before the code reaches the Service Endpoint lot of time is being spent at the weblogic layer. for files less than 10MB the performance is good but for files greater than 10 MB it takes around 3 mins to complete the request. I did take thread dumps and I see the thread servicing the requests is taking lot of time when executing SAX2DOMEx.characters it consumes around 80 -85 % of time here. Is there anything that I can do to improve the performance here ?
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" id=37 idx=0x90 tid=16848 prio=5 alive, suspended, native_blocked, daemon
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocLargeObjectOrArray(JIZ)Ljava/lang/Object;(Native Method)
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocObjectOrArray(Allocator.java:349)[optimized]
                at jrockit/vm/StringMaker.toString(StringMaker.java:188)[inlined]
                at com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CharacterDataImpl.appendData(CharacterDataImpl.java:191)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:218)[inlined]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:209)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/SAX2DOMWriterEx.writeCharacters( .java:108)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.handleCharacters(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:153)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.bridge(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:114)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writePayloadTo(StreamMessage.java:313)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeEnvelope(StreamMessage.java:343)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeTo(StreamMessage.java:321)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/AbstractMessageImpl.readAsSOAPMessage(AbstractMessageImpl.java:226)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/handler/SOAPMessageContextImpl.getMessage(SOAPMessageContextImpl.java:87)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/SOAPMessageContext.getMessage(SOAPMessageContext.java:252)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.getSecurityContext(WssHandler.java:318)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.preValidate(WssHandler.java:420)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/PreWssServerPolicyHandler.processRequest(PreWssServerPolicyHandler.java:25)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.handleRequest(WssHandler.java:112)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/TubeFactory$JAXRPCTube.processRequest(TubeFactory.java:222)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:866)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:815)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:778)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:680)
                ^-- Holding lock: com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber@0x83736a70[biased lock]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/server/WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:403)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:532)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:253)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/servlet/ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:171)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:708)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
                at weblogic/wsee/util/ServerSecurityHelper.authenticatedInvoke(ServerSecurityHelper.java:103)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$3.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:311)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:336)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/VerboseHttpProcessor.post(VerboseHttpProcessor.java:39)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/JAXWSServlet.doRequest(JAXWSServlet.java:98)
                at weblogic/servlet/http/AbstractAsyncServlet.service(AbstractAsyncServlet.java:99)
                at javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:183)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;)Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run()Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;Z)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.execute(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl;Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletResponseImpl;)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl.run()V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
                at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)

I am trying to upload a file using JAX-WS webservice which is deployed on the weblogic 10.3.5 server.Even before the code reaches the Service Endpoint lot of time is being spent at the weblogic layer. for files less than 10MB the performance is good but for files greater than 10 MB it takes around 3 mins to complete the request. I did take thread dumps and I see the thread servicing the requests is taking lot of time when executing SAX2DOMEx.characters it consumes around 80 -85 % of time here. Is there anything that I can do to improve the performance here ?
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" id=37 idx=0x90 tid=16848 prio=5 alive, suspended, native_blocked, daemon
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocLargeObjectOrArray(JIZ)Ljava/lang/Object;(Native Method)
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocObjectOrArray(Allocator.java:349)[optimized]
                at jrockit/vm/StringMaker.toString(StringMaker.java:188)[inlined]
                at com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CharacterDataImpl.appendData(CharacterDataImpl.java:191)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:218)[inlined]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:209)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/SAX2DOMWriterEx.writeCharacters( .java:108)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.handleCharacters(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:153)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.bridge(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:114)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writePayloadTo(StreamMessage.java:313)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeEnvelope(StreamMessage.java:343)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeTo(StreamMessage.java:321)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/AbstractMessageImpl.readAsSOAPMessage(AbstractMessageImpl.java:226)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/handler/SOAPMessageContextImpl.getMessage(SOAPMessageContextImpl.java:87)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/SOAPMessageContext.getMessage(SOAPMessageContext.java:252)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.getSecurityContext(WssHandler.java:318)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.preValidate(WssHandler.java:420)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/PreWssServerPolicyHandler.processRequest(PreWssServerPolicyHandler.java:25)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.handleRequest(WssHandler.java:112)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/TubeFactory$JAXRPCTube.processRequest(TubeFactory.java:222)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:866)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:815)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:778)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:680)
                ^-- Holding lock: com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber@0x83736a70[biased lock]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/server/WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:403)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:532)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:253)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/servlet/ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:171)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:708)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
                at weblogic/wsee/util/ServerSecurityHelper.authenticatedInvoke(ServerSecurityHelper.java:103)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$3.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:311)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:336)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/VerboseHttpProcessor.post(VerboseHttpProcessor.java:39)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/JAXWSServlet.doRequest(JAXWSServlet.java:98)
                at weblogic/servlet/http/AbstractAsyncServlet.service(AbstractAsyncServlet.java:99)
                at javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:183)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;)Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run()Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;Z)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.execute(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl;Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletResponseImpl;)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl.run()V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
                at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)

How to set-up Payment terms greater than 10 years

We have payment terms that go beyond 10 years. In the configuration of the payment terms, the "Additional months" field (V_T052-ZMONA) only contains 2 characters. 10 years * 12 months = 120 months which is already 3 characters long.
Anybody know a way of how to set-up payment terms which is greater than 10 years? Any user exits?
Appreciate any help!
DGE
Edited by: DGE on Jan 3, 2008 5:43 AM

Hi Amlan Sarkar,
I went through IMG: Financial Accounting (New)> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Business Transactions> Outgoing Invoices/Credit Memos> Maintain Terms of Payment.
Now for me to configure Payment terms up to year 2018 (for example); i need to enter in field "Additional months" value = 120. 120 is 10 years * 12 months, since receivables for the year 2018 is 120 months from the current date.
How the "Additional months" field is only 2 characters long. Therefore I am unable to enter the value 120 which is 3 characters long.
Any ideas on how I can configure this?
Thank you.

Greater Than Clause in Parition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for