GROUP BY IN FILTER CONDITIONS

Hi,
I am trying to filter the condition based on account number and year, for specific account numbers i want to limit it by fiscal year 2010, for others i want all the years from 2007. How can I group it under filters in OBIEE.
Ex: for account numbers 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003 I want to pull records from Year 2010. For account numbers 7000, 7003, 7700 I want to pull from year 2007, 2008, 2009.
I am new to OBIEE. Need help.
Thank you.

Try this:
1) In the filters area, set the filter on fiscal year >=2007
This will filter for only those records in the years you wish. (If you wish to see all others in an "Other" group, skip this step.)
2) Part 1 - Create a BINS column. One BIN for fiscal year equal 2010, call it "Current Year" and for the second BIN for fiscal year greater than or equal to 2007, call it "Previous Years"
3) Part 2 - Click on the "Clear All" button on the BINS tab of this column which will expose the CASE statement that OBI created.
4) Click on the other tab now and you will see the CASE statement. Add the additional condition for the account numbers : "...AND Account."Account Number" IN (1000,1001,1002,1003)..." for the first condition and ...AND Account."Account Number" IN (7000,7003,7700)... for the second case statement.
Now, put this BINS column in the pivot table under the Sections section and your report will be grouped by the two groups. (Note: If you chose to have an "Other" group, you will need to modify step 2 to add this BINS label.

Similar Messages

  • Filter conditions for Standard Idoc processing

    Hi Experts,
           In BD64 - Distribution model  , I have created filters for MATMAS based on Division, Sales Organization, Distribution channel and Material Type.
      when I process the IDoc through BD10 - Send material it is not getting filtered based on the conditions set in BD64.
    eg)  I have created a material in a particular sales organization for which the data should not be processed through Idoc based on the filter condition set for sales org in BD64.
       But now that the condition is not been checked and the Idoc is processed when i send it through BD10.
    whether BD10 will not check for the filter conditions?

    hi asik,
    partner in the generated idoc and in BD64 as a Receiver are the same.
    I am using single filter group in BD64 ( Matmas ) for Division , Sales Org, Distribution channel and material type.
    The filter group comprises the following filters:
    Division                             - 01
    Division                             - 02
    Sale org                            - ABCD
    Sale org                            - EFGH
    Distribution channel          - AA
    Distribution channel          - BB
    Mtrl Type                          - SPAR
    Mtrl Type                          - FNGD
    These result in the filter conditions should be like
    (Division 01 OR division 02)
    and
    (sale org ABCD or EFGH)
    and
    (Dst Channel AA or BB)
    and
    (mtrl type    SPAR or FNGD )
    Scenario for idoc processing
                                             Division          01
                                             sale org         xxxx
                                             dst channel   AA
                                             mtrl type        FNGD
    the Idoc should not be processed for the above scenario
    but its triggering an Idoc when I test it through BD10.

  • Need help for filter condition

    Hello All,
    I am currently using Oracle 10g and stuck for the filter condition.
    We have incident numbers and 5 activities to complete that incident. All the activities are same for each incident. When status of all the activities are done the incident is supposed to be completed.
    In my scenario, I want to select only those incidents where 2 (activity BB and CC) of 5 activities have status 'Done' and 1 activity (activity DD) has status 'Done' or 'Not Applicable'. I have tried to do this by certain filter combinations but couldnt achieve required result. I hope I will get this query answered here.
    Below is sample table.
    Incident Number
    Activity Name
    Activity Status
    10
    AA
    In Progress
    10
    BB
    Done
    10
    CC
    In Progress
    10
    DD
    Done
    10
    EE
    Not Started
    20
    AA
    In Progres
    20
    BB
    Done
    20
    CC
    Done
    20
    DD
    Not Applicable
    20
    EE
    Done
    My selection criteria is
    Activity Name
    Activity Status
    BB
    Done
    CC
    Done
    DD
    Done or Not Applicable
    Now, in this case I would like to see incident number 20 only in my result as it has BB activity Done, CC activity Done and DD activity Not Applicable which serves my criteria.
    Any help will greately appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Shantanu

    971628 wrote:
    Hi RaminHashimzadeh,
    My selection criteria is
    Activity Name
    Activity Status
    BB
    Done
    CC
    Done
    DD
    Done or Not Applicable
    I dont want incident numbers where status of activity BB and CC = Not Applicable. It should only be 'Done' for BB and CC. It could be 'Done' or 'Not Applicable' only for DD activity. Your query would not serve my requirement.
    OK
    check this :
    select Incident from t
    group by Incident
    having count(case when (ActivityStatus = 'Done' and Activity in ('BB','CC')) or
                           (ActivityStatus in ('Done','Not Applicable') and Activity = 'DD')
                       then 1 end) = 3
    Ramin Hashimzade

  • Error in using a variable in filter condition in an Interface

    Hi All,
    I am using a variable in my interface in a filter condition. I have an EMP table of scott schema and want to pull all the records wiht hiredate date lying between 2 dates, incremental pull.For this I have created 2 variables and using them in the filter condition. I am getting an error inthe interface when I run in a package after declaring and refresing the variables.
    com.sunopsis.sql.SnpsMissingParametersException: Missing parameter
         at com.sunopsis.sql.SnpsQuery.completeHostVariable(SnpsQuery.java)
         at com.sunopsis.sql.SnpsQuery.updateExecStatement(SnpsQuery.java)
         at com.sunopsis.sql.SnpsQuery.executeUpdate(SnpsQuery.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSql.execStdOrders(SnpSessTaskSql.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSql.treatTaskTrt(SnpSessTaskSql.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSqlI.treatTaskTrt(SnpSessTaskSqlI.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessTaskSql.treatTask(SnpSessTaskSql.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSessStep.treatSessStep(SnpSessStep.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.treatSession(SnpSession.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.DwgCommandSession.treatCommand(DwgCommandSession.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.DwgCommandBase.execute(DwgCommandBase.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.e.i(e.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.g.y(g.java)
         at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.e.run(e.java)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
    Regards,
    Krishna

    Hi Krishna,
    What is the datatype of the Variable lastupdate ?
    In my case
    Variable
    Name : LastUpdateDate
    Datatype : Alphanumeric
    Action : Historize
    Query : select to_char(to_date(sysdate,'DD-MON-YY'),'DD-MON-YY') from sys.dual
    Then in filter I used
    EMP.HIREDATE>to_date('#LastUpdateDate','DD-MON-YY')
    Thanks
    Sutirtha

  • Can't find FILTER CONDITION for filters or Function_Name for Functions

    In the Data Warehouse 11gr1 views all_iv_xform...
    I can't seem to find the Filter Conditions for filters and function name for functions that are called.
    I have looked at the other views in the documentation for the API's but can't seem to find this information.
    Any body have any ideas where this information is?
    thanks
    greG

    select map_component_id, position, source_parameter_name
    from ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_PARAMETERS
    where map_component_id in (
    SELECT map_component_id
    FROM ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_COMPONENTS
    WHERE MAP_ID IN (
    select MAP_ID
    from ALL_IV_XFORM_MAPS
    where MAP_NAME = :p_map_name
    AND OPERATOR_TYPE = 'Filter'
    Using map_component_id and position from above query you can see your filter condition defined in property_value:
    select map_component_name, property_name, property_value
    from ALL_IV_XFORM_MAP_PROPERTIES
    where map_component_id = :p_comp_id;

  • Issue in using presentation variable as filter condition in the reports

    Hi,
    I have an issue in using presentation variable as filter condition in my reports the details are as follows:
    Details :
    We want to implement the Max and Min variables through Presentation variables only.we do not want to implement it through session variables in this case.
    We have two variables MIN and MAX to be used as Presentation Variables,for a column of the report (which is a quantity),so that the user wants to see the data for this column within a particular range.i.e the Min and the Max.This part has been implemented well . The issue is when the user wants to see the full data.In that case we will not pass any values to these two Presentation Variable or in other words we are not restricting the report data so we are not passing any value to the variables,this is when the report is throwing the error. we want to leave this variables blank in that case.but this is giving error.
    Please suggest how can I overcome this issue.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    i think you have to use guided navigation for this. create two reports first is the one you are having currently and second is the one in which remove the presentation variable from the column formula. i.e. the same report with no aggregation applied.
    Now create a dummy report and make it return value only when the presentation variable value is not equal to max or min. guide the report to navigate between the first and second report based on the result of the dummy report.

  • Getting filter condition values from a table within the mapping

    I have a table say mytable with columns as name, age and maritalstatus. I have another table paramtable with the following structure parametername, parametervalue. The data in this would be like say
    Age >= 24
    Maritalstatus F
    Now from the table mytable I want to apply a filter which uses the values from the paramtable. Basically the filter condition should be something like
    mytable.age >= 24 and maritalstatus = F
    Any help on how this can be done within OWB?
    Appreciate all the help i can get

    rveluthattil wrote:
    I have a table say mytable with columns as name, age and maritalstatus. I have another table paramtable with the following structure parametername, parametervalue. The data in this would be like say
    Age >= 24
    Maritalstatus F
    Now from the table mytable I want to apply a filter which uses the values from the paramtable. Basically the filter condition should be something like
    mytable.age >= 24 and maritalstatus = F
    Any help on how this can be done within OWB?
    Appreciate all the help i can getoption 1. take table 1 and tabl2 into a joiner and apply this filter on the joiner.
    2. If table 1 has age and marital status then you can straightaway apply a filter with the condition without using table 2.
    if you are always going to link tabl1 and tab2 then perhaps using a joiner is the best way.
    Edited by: Darthvader-647181 on Nov 6, 2008 5:49 AM

  • How to apply Filter condition for a specific column but not to the report?

    Hi,
    I am having a issue in applying a filter condition to one of the column.
    I have a schema with one fact table and around 10 dimension tables. My requirement is to bring a count on the fact table with related to some other columns from the dimension tables.
    Lets consider a scenario with tables like Sales (Fact), Region (Dimension), Year(Dimension), Sale Type (Dimension).
    Now my requirement is to bring out the fields
    City(Region) --City                                   
    Year -- Year
    Sales Count(Sales table) ---Count of all sales from the fact table
    Sales Count(Sales table) -- Count of all sales from the fact table where sales type is 'CASH'
    Here my issue is how do I apply the filter condition of Sales Type='CASH' only on one of the Sales Count column which is from the fact table. I want the filter condition to be imposed only for the fourth column.
    Can anyone let me know how to achieve this?
    Thanks

    This is quite simpe. Edit the column formula for the 4th column and put something like this. I am doing this from memory so the syntax might need checking:
    Case When "Dimension Table"."Sales Type"='CASH' Then "Fact Table"."Measure" Else Null End
    You could also consider making this a permanent addition to your RPD if this measure will be used again and again. You would add a new logical column and use the expression builder to arrive at the same result.

  • How to collapse the filter conditions

    Hi,
    We are displaying the filter conditions under each dashboards. But our conditions are around 10, so the user want to collapse them by defualt.
    if they want they want to expand and see the filters.
    Can any suggest how to achieve this.
    Also, during export to ppt they want the filter conditions also to be exported.
    thanks,
    Venkat.

    somisettyramana wrote:
    Hi,
    We are displaying the filter conditions under each dashboards. But our conditions are around 10, so the user want to collapse them by defualt.
    if they want they want to expand and see the filters.
    Can any suggest how to achieve this.
    Also, during export to ppt they want the filter conditions also to be exported.
    thanks,
    Venkat.This is what you should do:
    1) Ensure that the Filter View exists in your report.
    2) In your dashboard, drag TWO instances of your report in a section, one beneath the other.
    3) In the second (bottom) instance, click on the Rename button. Type "Filter View" and then check the "Use Dashboard..." checkbox. Click "OK."
    4) Click on the Properties button: Properties>Display Results>Link - In a Separate Window.
    5) Click on the Properties button again: Properties>Show View>Filters 1
    Now check out the dashboard. You will see a simple link that indicates the Filter View of the report without taking up any real estate on your dashboard. It costs you nothing extra and automatically updates when you modify your report.
    That's what you should do for dashboard reports.

  • Essbase cannot union mutliple groups with Essbase filter

    Hi All,
    I got a problem to provisioning on Shared Service.
    In some case, I need to grant multiple filters to a Essbase users, say user01.
    However, each user can associated one Essbase filter only.
    For better management, I create multiple groups with different filters and assign the user, user01, into the groups.
    For first two groups are working normally. However, Essbase cannot "union" all filters from multiple groups after the users join the third groups.
    However, I try to combine the three filter into a filter with three rows. It is working!!!
    It is because there are large number of users in external LDAP. It is unmanageable when combining multiple filters into a filters. Is there any way to solve this problem? or is there any better approach to do the security ?
    Thanks in advance!!!
    Regards,
    TKC

    Thanks for your reply.
    I have following structure in Essbase. I try to make it simple to understand.
    Dept (dimension)
    |_C00
    |_CTTL
    |_C01
    |_C02
    Project (dimension)
    |_GEN
    |_P01
    |_P02
    |_P03
    |_PI
    |_A
    |_P01 (shared member)
    |_B
    |_P02 (shared member)
    |_P03 (shared member)
    Group A with Filter F01
    Read - CTTL, IDESCENDENT(A)
    Group B with Filter F02
    Read - C01, P01, P02
    User joins A and B group.
    The end result of user is that
    he can access CTTL of P01 only
    he can access C01 of P01 and P02 only
    he cannot access C02 of any Project dimension
    he cannot access CTTL of P03
    However, I found that when I change to metaread. The result is going wrong.
    he can access C01 of P01, P02 and P03 only.
    It is because I need to block user to view members which he cannot access.
    I need "metaread" function.
    So somebody tell me how to achieve this? Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: user070322 on Jan 4, 2009 8:37 PM
    Edited by: user070322 on Jan 5, 2009 6:04 PM

  • Create two logical columns with same LTS mapping but diff filter conditions

    Hi,
    Problem:
    How to create two logical columns within same logical table mapped to same physical column but different filter conditions?
    I have a scenario where in,
    Physical layer columns
         - table1.employee
         - table1.emp_city
    I need a columns in logical layer:
    Logical layer - lt1.count_emp_delhi (counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Delhi')
              lt1.count_emp_mumbai(counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Mumbai')
    My approach:
    For Delhi column
    1. Create a logical column lt1.count_emp_delhi mapped to the physical column table1.employee
    2. Aggregate using countdistinct in aggregate tab.
    3. Edit the mapping condition
         3.1. Use the where clause and set table1.emp_city='Delhi'.
    For Mumbai column.
    Followed the same approach as above but in 3.1 if I change the condition to 'Mumbai', even the delhi column is populated with mumbai count which is ERRONEOUS
    Could some one please help?

    Hi,
    1. Create two alias tables for table1 in Physical Layer. Lets say TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi
    2. Create a logical table in BMM layer (D1 Employee Cities )
    3. Drag and drop the employee & emp_city columns from both alias tables (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi ) into your newly created logical table.
    4. Now you can see two Logical Table Sources (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi )
    5. Now using Where condition, write the condition on each table
    NOTE: Don't write any condition on the Physical table Table1.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Kalyan Chukkapalli
    http://123obi.com

  • Outer join with Filter condition

    Hi there,
    I need some help with Data Services. I am creating an outer join between two tables and one of them has filter condition but it creates and outerjoin and apply the filter condition to the whole result set.
    SELECT "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."ACTY_DT" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_CL" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_STRT_DT" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_ACTY_TS" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_ACTY_TS" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."MINS_ON_TRN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_STA_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."MAJ_VEH_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_DIST_KM" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NET_TN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_GROS_TN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NTK" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_GTK" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."HLNG_LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."09_HLNG_LOCO_FL" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SUM_LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_BUS_GRP_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_COAL_MRKR_CD" 
    FROM "DBO"."IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1" "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"
    LEFT OUTER JOIN "DBO"."IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT" "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"
    ON ( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SRVC_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_NO" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SRVC_STRT_DT" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_STRT_DT" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" )
    WHERE ( "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."09_HLNG_LOCO_FL" = 'Y')
    While, what I need is as under
    SELECT "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."ACTY_DT" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_CL" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_STRT_DT" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_ACTY_TS" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_ACTY_TS" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."MINS_ON_TRN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_STA_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."MAJ_VEH_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_DIST_KM" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NET_TN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_GROS_TN" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_NTK" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."VEH_GTK" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."HLNG_LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."09_HLNG_LOCO_FL" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SUM_LOCO_MPU" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_BUS_GRP_CD" , "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_COAL_MRKR_CD" 
    FROM "DBO"."IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1" "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"
    LEFT OUTER JOIN "DBO"."IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT" "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"
    ON ( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SRVC_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_NO" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."SRVC_STRT_DT" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."SRVC_STRT_DT" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."FR_SRVC_SEQ_NO" ) AND( "IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" = "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."TO_SRVC_SEQ_NO" ) AND  ( "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."09_HLNG_LOCO_FL" = 'Y')
    Please let me know, how to fix this issue. If you have come across such issue before. If need be I can send you the ATL file for this data flow. 
    BTW, I am using Data Services XI 3.2 (12.2.0.0) and the database is SQL 2005, both on Windows Platform.
    Thanks & regards,
    Doshi Bhavesh

    Hi,
    Use two query transforms;
    First will only connect to IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1 and use it to apply filter  "IWFMR13T_VEH_NTK_TMP1"."09_HLNG_LOCO_FL" = 'Y'
    In second query transform perform outer join on IWFMR11T_SGMT_LCNT and output of first query.
    This should give required result.
    If you are using single query transform join will be performed at DB level and if you use custom sql in query transform it will not have increased load on DB. I will recommend to use custom sql to get good performance.
    Sachin

  • ALV Question : How to set filter condition which contain dummy character?

    Hi,
    I want to set filter condition of ALV dynamicly (In my code),
    for example, set 'X' as filter condition in column "Description",
    I add the code successfully, but I can't get the correct filtered result, Why?

    Please post ur code here.
    U have to get a  handle to the IF_SALV_WD_FILTER interface
    data ref_filter   type ref to IF_SALV_WD_FILTER  .
    ref_filter ?= m_config_model->IF_SALV_WD_FIELD_SETTINGS~GET_FIELD( 'FIELD DESCRIPTION' )
    ref_filter->CREATE_FILTER_RULE( 
                       low_val = 'X'
    Now when u load the ALV tabl;e u should see a X value in the filter row, for the column 'FIELD DESCRIPTION'  and the filter should happen.
    As I said, pls paste ur code here.

  • 2 same surrogate keys with different filter conditions in one report

    how do we put 2 same sr keys with different filter conditions in one single report??
    for example, we have to get the 'count' for tm_sr_key:
    1. count(tm_sr_key) where past_due_flag = Y
    2. count(tm_sr_key) where past_due_flag = Y and N
    to be displayed in one single report.
    it happens that both sr_keys will display the same measure (which is the 1st filter conditions)
    and the filter under criteria tab in anwer will show as :
    tm_sr_key where {filter condition 1}
    AND
    tm_sr_key where {filter condition 2}
    instead of :
    tm_sr_key where {filter condition 1} for 1st measure
    tm_sr_key where {filter condition 2} for 2nd measure
    d only option i could think right now is to duplicate the tm_sr_key data in the same table but with different name say, tm_sr_key_2..
    kindly pls help.
    thanx

    i'm sorry, not really understand.
    could you pls explain a bit more about the filter column? how do we do it? coz i'm really new in this tool.
    r u talking about editing the filter located under the column on the right side of the OBIEE answers?
    or is it by editing the 'edit column formula' for required column; that is by replacing the 'column formula' expression with this:
    FILTER(EXPS_FACT.FAC_SR_KEY USING EXPS_FACT.PAST_DUE_FLAG = 'Y') <----if it is like this, i tried it already & its giving me an error message..
    thanx.
    Edited by: rezza.nasha on May 28, 2009 1:26 AM

  • Getting active filter conditions from interactive reports

    I have been having trouble with how to properly get the filter conditions that a user has applied to an interactive report. I have tried to get at this information using the Apex defined view APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_IR_COND. However, the problem I am running into is if the user ends their session without first removing their filter conditions, those conditions remain in this view the next time (and any future times) the report is accessed. I can not seem to determine how to tell which filter conditions are actually active in the report. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    I've done several tests, and the results I'm getting are not like that, if it were there would be no problem. The exact steps I'm doing is setting an arbitrary filter on an interactive report, and then logging out. When I log back in the view still shows those filter conditions, but no records are filtered on the actual report. I've tried this on two separate installations of apex (one 3.1, the other 3.2) and the results are the same. Is this irregular? Or has anyone else found a workaround for this.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to delete the duplicates in the scneario

    Hi I was created one staging table(10 columns) and uploaded sales order details and Invoice Details in to the same staging table. Here transaction type is SO and INV Requirement is: If the invoice created for the sales order delete those sales orders

  • How to Get Opportunity Detail's in appointment ?

    Hi , I am working with a report with Opportunity and Appointment Detail's . If i Select Opportunity fields from Appointment(Activity) subject area i am Error as *"+No results+* *+This problem may be due to the lack of data or a filter too restrictive

  • PERNR in PC00_M99_Cwtr

    Hi How can i get PERNR in Wage type reporter? Thanks in advance

  • Yosemite vs Exchange

    Customer recently upgraded to Yostemite. Now his mail client doesn't work right. He is connecting to an exchange server. After rebooting the machine, the first time he opens Mail it will update and sync. Then after "a bit," which I'm unsure of how lo

  • Why my IFRAME is reloaded infinitely?

    Hello! I need to hace a JSPs containing 2 different JSPs. The real reason is that I need 2 (very) big DataTables at the same time in the screen. Users have to check any of the rows in both DataTable and click a special action for them. Then I had tho