[grub2] Missing ".gmo" ".mo" files in /boot/grub/locale/

Hello,
today I did a "pacman -Syu", grub was updated ( replaced by core/grub )
the update was ok, no problem,
but I notice now a quick error message during the boot process :
error: file '/boot/grub/locale/fr.gmo' not found
then the boot menu is displayed and I can boot arch linux without problem,
when I check the directory /boot/grub/locale/ I see no files, that's why I have this error message,
I use the MBR for booting grub and I have a pentium 4 laptop,
I try to reinstall grub :
grub-install --recheck /dev/sda
but I still have the same error message on boot,
the wiki says that "grub.mo" file is in /usr/share/locale/en@quot/LC_MESSAGES/ but I see no "grub.mo", no "fr.mo" in this directory, so I can not copy these files to /boot/grub/locale/,
so I think there is a bug in grub package, missing "*.mo" files, because before this update I never had this error message
Last edited by Potomac (2013-06-26 09:29:55)

Potomac wrote:
bpont wrote:
graysky wrote:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/35937
Packager to the rescue; the system works ;p
Should be reopened, bug still present in 2.00.5086-1
http://i44.tinypic.com/27y1jev.jpg
you probably forgot to finish the installation of grub,
you must type some instructions in the console like "grub-install --recheck /dev/sdX" ( where X is the partition where grub is installed ), read the wiki :
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Grub#Installation
Read up-thread. I didn't forget anything and there's no need to read the wiki. These were two fresh installs on two different systems using the most current arch install discs. There was no previous installation to upgrade from and I didn't forget to add the --recheck option either. My previous post stands...grub is simply looking for a file that doesn't exist. Both systems I installed on have the same modules listed:
I'd rather not hack around the problem, since it still boots normally. I'll wait for upstream to correct this bug.
Last edited by bpont (2013-11-15 22:42:48)

Similar Messages

[SOLVED]Unable to install grub "couldn't find /mnt/boot/grub/menu.lst"

Ok so I was trying to install windows after I had arch installed, used an ubuntu cd to use gparted to create a partition, tried to go to the windows installation but it would endlessly send me back to restart the installation even after succesfully writting all files...
So now I decided to not install it, went back into ubuntu/gparted, deleted the partition and rejoined the space with my main arch partition and then selected the "boot" flag to boot...
Cannot boot, grub its still on /boot/ but the MBR its obviously tempered with by windows ( which coincidentally couldn't even find itself after writing mbr to its liking....*sigh* ).
So I try to use my arch install cd to reinstall grub but i get this:
"couldn't find /mnt/boot/grub/menu.lst is grub installed?"
I tried to use the select packages thing to make sure the cd is mounted and mounts fine but it keeps getting me that error message. I managed to boot to my system just fine with arch root=/dev/sda1 but obviosly the kernell does not has my nvidia module which means I can't get into x which means i am using links and since my grub is not loaded i can't even get framebuffer so this is rather inconvenient.
Im sure im missing a very simple and stupid thing but im so annoyed my brain must be saying "ok im done somebody else figure it out". I still have a backup copy of my grub menu.lst I made before. Do I just delete /bood/grub/ and try again? Am I missing something on the install procedure to be able to rewrite grub? Can I just do it from the command line or with pacman? Any help appreciate it thanks.
Last edited by Misanthrope (2008-06-01 17:22:32)

If you can get into your arch and cli then you should just be able to reinstall grub with
install-grub /dev/sda
or reinstall grub with
pacman -S grub
if the package is messed up or missing.

Grub2 1.98-2 upgrade no boot!

I'm not sure if it was my fault, but the last upgrade of grub make my system unbootable, because moved /boot/grub.cfg to /boot/grub.cfg.pacsave and there was no /boot/grub.cfg anymore. When I rebooted the system showed the grub mini-shell.
I had to restore using an usb-arch-install

pressh wrote:
yes sorry about that....
it's already fixed in -3...failed to notice that grub.cfg would be removed when removing it from the backup array --> moved it back.
also the example file is now installed as grub.cfg.example.
You can be lucky about the fact, that I am not in the same room as you
Here it is 24:00 CET and I just wanted to reboot my macbook, to test "all the new updates" and got the shock of my life!
But in fact I thank you for your work, now I can boot manually with Grub2
Everyone who is in panic and need help, read this:
http://grub.enbug.org/Manual#head-4ec5b … a094d943bb
*Read with cat /boot/grub/grub.conf.pacsave
*load kernel configuration with linux /boot/kernelname root=/dev/... initrd ...
*boot
As Picard would say "Engage!".
Goodnight from europe/germany.

Windows 8 and ArchLinux dual-boot - Failed to open file: arch\boot\...

Hey!
I have a problem where I don't know how to configure the EFISTUB to boot ArchLinux along Windows 8. I have read the instructions on the wiki and tried for two days and the only thing I've come up with is copying some files into the /boot/efi/EFI/arch/ folder, and adding the entry into the UEFI boot menu. I can select it when Restarting Windows8 through the shift-restart thing and stuff but when it attempts to boot it says:
Failed to open file: arch\boot\archiso.img
I don't know how to set this up and fix it. I am so confused with everything right now due to the instructions on the wiki basically being "You can either do it this way, that way or any other way." but does not specifically expain how each works (at least so that I understand it fully) and what has to be done to complete these steps. Like, I need a complete tutorial from Start to Finish, to do this because I'm too nervous messing up my partitions. I have understood some parts thought and what I want is to be able to boot it from the EFISTUB instead of chain-booting like I usually do. I just don't know how to connect the entry in the list to the proper files to boot the system.
What I have done:
Installed the base system.
Istalled grub in the base system but has not used grub to install on the /boot yet because I don't know if it is to be used if I'm supposed to use the EFISTUB (I was thinking efibootmgr would be enough)
Tried to use efibootmgr to make the entry, but the entry does not work. (If this is how I should do it, can you explain which partition to target and what the different values would mean when answering?)
I don't know which one is right, or if both shall be done (I guess Grub is used if I want to chain-load. I guess I can do it if it's the only way)
Anyway, I hope you guys can answer me so I can fix this. Thanks

What you're trying to do now is:
EFI->kernel (EFI stub)
This is appealingly direct, but it's tricky to get working. What the wiki now recommends is:
EFI->gummiboot->kernel (EFI stub)
...or...
EFI->GRUB->kernel
These approaches are less direct, but they're easier to configure. The trouble is that both the EFI's built-in boot manager and the EFI stub loader are tricky to configure. For a newbie to get them both configured correctly on a first attempt at installing Arch is very difficult. Getting the EFI to launch gummiboot or GRUB is easier because these programs don't require the complex parameters that the EFI stub loader requires. Those parameters can instead be specified in the gummiboot or GRUB configuration file, which is easier to manage for quite a few reasons.
If you want to pursue using the EFI stub loader directly, you certainly can. I've learned from experience, though, that it's not worth my time to try to help with users who want to do this. Using an intermediary program is easier to get working. IMHO, the direct approach has no real benefits except that it gives you bragging rights that you've done it. Your system won't boot any faster or more reliably in the more direct approach. (Well, technically it will be faster, by only by a matter of milliseconds, assuming you use a 0 timeout value in gummiboot.) In fact, it will be less reliable, because gummiboot, GRUB, and rEFInd all offer ways to adjust boot options on a boot-by-boot basis, which is very helpful when fixing problems. You can't do this with the direct approach.

Update-grub (grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg)

okay so i use a bash script to generate my grub config its just an alias to grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg but with the last update (today) i am now getting this
[fennectech@FennecNET_Mobile ~]$ sudo update-grub
Generating grub configuration file ...
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-linux
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-linux.img
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
Found fallback initramfs image: /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
/proc/devices: No entry for device-mapper found
done
i am really worried not sure what this means
EDIT______
[fennectech@FennecNET_Mobile ~]$ sudo update-grub
[sudo] password for fennectech:
Generating grub configuration file ...
Warning: Setting GRUB_TIMEOUT to a non-zero value when GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT is set is no longer supported.
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-linux
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-linux.img
Found fallback initramfs image: /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img
done
[fennectech@FennecNET_Mobile ~]$
now this is after a reboot
Last edited by fennectech (2014-07-08 18:27:09)

Not a Sysadmin issue, moving to NC...

I'm missing a DLL file in Leopard

Hi, im trying to install the IE 8 beta on my new leopard system and it says im missing the DLL file CSSEQCHK.DLL what do i do?

Hi blackhawkjr,
You would have to be running Windows in order to run Internet Explorer 8 beta using BootCamp.
"CSSEQCHK.DLL " File is a Windows based file and cannot be read by the Mac OS.
About Boot Camp
With Boot Camp you can install and run Windows XP or Windows Vista on your Intel-based Mac computer, using a Microsoft Windows installation disc that you provide.
Boot Camp Assistant (located in the Utilities folder in the Applications folder) helps you set up a Windows partition on your computer's hard disk and then start the installation of your Windows software. To complete the Boot Camp installation, you install Boot Camp drivers to enable Windows on your Mac.
After installing Windows and the Boot Camp drivers, you can start up your Mac in either Windows or Mac OS X.
Home Index
Installing Windows XP or Windows Vista on your Mac
You can install Windows XP or Windows Vista on your Mac using Boot Camp Assistant, located in the Utilities folder in the Applications folder.
NOTE: If you have already installed Boot Camp on your Mac and want to upgrade Windows, you don’t need to reinstall Boot Camp.
To install and set up Windows on your Mac, you’ll need an Intel-based Mac computer with:
A USB keyboard and mouse, or a built-in keyboard and trackpad
Mac OS X version 10.5 or later (the latest version of Mac OS X is strongly recommended)
The latest firmware updates installed
At least 10 GB of free space on the disk you’re installing on
A built-in optical disc drive, or, if you have a MacBook Air, a compatible external optical drive connected directly to your computer
A licensed copy of Windows XP Home Edition or Professional, or Windows Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, or Ultimate
IMPORTANT: You must use a single full-install Windows installation disc. To install Windows XP, you must have Service Pack 2 or later. Do not install Windows XP without Service Pack 2 and attempt to upgrade it later. Use only 32-bit versions of Windows. If you have a Mac Pro or a MacBook Pro introduced in early 2008 or later, you can use a 64-bit version of Windows Vista.
To install Windows on your Mac:
Back up the important information on your computer.
Open Boot Camp Assistant (located in the Utilities folder in the Applications folder).
Print and follow the instructions in the “Boot Camp Installation & Setup Guide.”
To install Windows using Boot Camp, you must be logged in as an administrator of your computer.
*DO NOT proceed with any installations* until you have read all the material and feel confident in doing so. http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/bootcamp.html
Carolyn
Message was edited by: Carolyn Samit

/boot/grub is not readable by GRUB?

During mid installation of grub after completing everything else on the beginners tutorial, the error when trying to install grub using the "grub-install --target=i386-pc --recheck /dev/sda" it appears with the error "Path '/boot/grub' is not readable by GRUB on boot. Installation is impossible. Aborting." May be a noobish question or problem, but how can i make the grub installation possible?

It doens't matter where you put that little partition.
Maybe you should try syslinux instead. It is stupid simple... I love it. Grub2 is great if you need to have your boot partition on LVM2 or some other crazy crap. But honestly, I think that 90% of the features are pretty much useless for a user like myself. Though I use LVM2 on Luks on Raid-0, but I keep a separate /boot partition anyway which doubles as my EFI System Partition.
Edit: During the month or so that I used Grub2, I actually upgraded computers during that time. So I had the EF02 partition at the end of my old computer's drive and the beginning of the new one, and both worked no problem.
Last edited by WonderWoofy (2012-12-22 18:16:36)

[solved] /boot/grub/grub.cfg installed as /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacnew

Hello there,
With the latest update of grub-common I got the following message:
( 3/15) upgrading grub-common [################################################################] 100%
warning: /boot/grub/grub.cfg installed as /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacnew
However, should I reflect the changes of grub.cfg.pacnew or simply ignore it because grub.cfg is generated automatically?
Last edited by orschiro (2013-05-29 05:08:19)

koz wrote:
cfr wrote:
Natanji wrote:I just broke my system with this, so I think the package should *at least* post a notice to the user asking him to run "grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg" - or simply doing so post-installation, even. I know, my fault, but it's still really easy to overlook...
Since automating it would make it virtually impossible to maintain a manually configured grub.cfg, I disagree. Arch does not do that stuff automatically. Even for those who do not hand edit the config file, it is likely to break things if people have more complex setups. (For example, in some cases, grub will not find an OS unless the partition is mounted and it might not be mounted.) Actually, not even Fedora does this automatically although I suspect that is considered a bug.
As for the warning, pacman does warn you. It tells you it has installed a *.pacnew file. That tells you two things: (1) you needed to customise the previous default config, and (2) the default config has changed. That copying the pacnew over your old config will break things is standard: blindly copying *any* pacnew over your old, customised file will break things. I agree that it breaks things in a bigger way in this case but the principle is exactly the same. That is not to say that I think a reminder would be out of place - other boot loaders'managers do post such messages. But being told about a pacnew or a pacsave file *is* notification from grub that user intervention is required and this is usually because somebody who knows the system and customisations made previously is required to adapt the changes to accommodate the update. i.e. it is usually because blindly overwriting stuff is very likely to break things.
It is automated! WTF?!
Not really. One can hand edit grub.cfg and the package does not interfere with that.
This is what pacman threw out at me:
warning: /etc/default/grub saved as /etc/default/grub.pacsave
warning: /boot/grub/grub.cfg saved as /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacsave
( 1/11) upgrading cgminer [#######################################] 100%
( 2/11) upgrading e2fsprogs [#######################################] 100%
( 3/11) installing grub [#######################################] 100%
Copying /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacsave to /boot/grub/grub.cfg
Is this intended??
It, thankfully, didn't break anything but this isn't what should have happened. I am sure it will ruin someone's day.
I agree this is strange. I have no idea why it moves your old config to a .pacsave and then copies that .pacsave back to grub.cfg. Effectively what it does is just make a copy of your config as .pacsave but I don't know why it does that.
It is in fact quite unlikely to break anything since it is very likely that an existing grub.cfg will work with the new version of grub. Obviously people should check but if somebody doesn't it is not likely to do any harm. I am not sure what you did to break your configuration but I doubt that you copied grub.cfg.pacsave to grub.cfg.

What command to start kernel 3.0 in /boot/grub/menu.lst? [solved]

Currently I have:
# (0) Arch Linux
title Arch Linux
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/b37afb64-426a-4f68-81eb-a2b3eaa1df73 ro
initrd /kernel26.img
Last edited by carebearboy (2011-07-28 02:30:25)

karol wrote:
Why not use the new kernel from the testing repo?
http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/ … nux.preset
I'm not sure what
ALL_kver="/boot/vmlinuz-linux"
does, the presets looked a bit different for kernel26 http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/ … l26.preset
I'll try to boot without that line. I noticed that too.
As for installing the kernel from [testing], I get this:
[root@myhost user]# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
testing is up to date
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace kernel26 with testing/linux? [Y/n] y
:: Replace kernel26-headers with testing/linux-headers? [Y/n] y
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: audit: requires kernel26-headers>=2.6.30
[root@myhost user]# pacman -S linux linux-headers
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: linux and kernel26 are in conflict. Remove kernel26? [y/N] y
:: linux-headers and kernel26-headers are in conflict. Remove kernel26-headers? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: audit: requires kernel26-headers>=2.6.30
:: nvidia: requires kernel26>=2.6.39
:: nvidia: requires kernel26<2.6.40
[root@myhost user]#
[root@myhost user]# pacman -Qi kernel26-headers
Name : kernel26-headers
Version : 2.6.39.3-1
URL : http://www.kernel.org
Licenses : GPL2
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : None
Optional Deps : None
Required By : audit
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 42316.00 K
Packager : Thomas Bächler <[email protected]>
Architecture : x86_64
Build Date : Sat 09 Jul 2011 09:02:41 AM EDT
Install Date : Wed 27 Jul 2011 03:03:45 PM EDT
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : No
Description : Header files and scripts for building modules for kernel26
[root@myhost user]#
Should I 'Pacman Rdd kernel26-headers', or is that a bad idea?
* EDIT *
Compiling just finished:
*Summary of Changes - File(s) Created and/or Deleted*
8 File(s) Created:
/usr/src/linux-3.0-KNL/
/boot/vmlinuz-3.0-ARCH
/boot/kernel30-3.0-ARCH.img
/lib/modules/3.0.0-ARCH/
/usr/src/linux
/usr/src/linux-3.0
/boot/System.map-3.0
/boot/System.map
*No Files Were Deleted*
*SUCCESS - Main Processes COMPLETE*
*NVIDIA users, please make additional NECESSARY adjustments*
*Please Configure /boot/grub/menu.lst accordingly and you are done. Then REBOOT & TEST!*
It's probably better just to use the compiled image now that I know it's successful.
Last edited by carebearboy (2011-07-27 19:23:50)

Configuring GRUB: /boot/grub/menu.lstn

I have two disks, Solaris 10 on one and Windows XP on the other
(c1t2d0). (the 3rd disks mirrors the 1st)
I want to boot into Solaris by default.
How do I edit /boot/grub/menu.lstn file to reflect this?
Here are the disks:
#: format
Searching for disks...done
c1t2d0: configured with capacity of 136.71GB
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c1t0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 36469 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
/pci@0,0/pci10de,376@a/pci1000,3150@0/sd@0,0
1. c1t1d0 <DEFAULT cyl 36469 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
/pci@0,0/pci10de,376@a/pci1000,3150@0/sd@1,0
2. c1t2d0 <SUN146G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 848>
/pci@0,0/pci10de,376@a/pci1000,3150@0/sd@2,0
Specify disk (enter its number): ^D

This works:
title Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_10 X86
kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
#---------------------END BOOTADM--------------------
#---------- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT ----------
title Solaris failsafe
kernel /boot/multiboot kernel/unix -s
module /boot/x86.miniroot-safe
title Windows XP
rootnoverify (hd2,0)
map (hd0) (hd2)
map (hd2) (hd0)
chainloader +1

Error message: Missing PDF maker files in Word 2007

OK, I am beyond frustrated. I have had nothing but trouble with Windows Vista and Adobe Acrobat. Please help!!!
What happens: first, the pdf addin for Word 2007 suddenly becomes disabled, for no apparent reason. Forget about trying to re-enable it through the Add-Ins menu, because Word tells me that the "connected state of Office Add-Ins registered in the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE cannot be changed". This is a problem for me, because I use a special font (Vietnamese) that sometimes gets corrupted when running pdf maker. The only consistent way I have found to avoid this problem is to run the pdf maker as "Quick PDF" and as far as I can see that option is only available through the pdf addin in Word, I have never been able to find it when I open the Acrobat program and create a pdf from there.
Second problem: shortly after the pdf addin becomes disabled, my Acrobat program loses the ability to create pdfs altogether. I get the error message "Missing PDF maker files". Yes, I have tried repairing the installation and re-starting my computer per the instructions given. It doesn't fix the problem. I also tried looking in the Knowledge Database on this website, but it appears that the instructions they have to fix the problem there are for earlier versions of Word, not 2007, because my version of word does not look like the version of Word in their little videos.
This is the second time this has happened. The first time I resolved the problem by a) re-installing Acrobat, which is a pain because it involves calling Adobe and wading through their customer service to get a new installation number, and b) paying a computer repair service to dig deep into the guts of my computer and convince it to change the Office Add-ins to allow the pdf addin again. It worked for about 6 months, and now I have the same problem again. For some reason Vista is spontaneously disabling Acrobat.
I simply cannot deal with this every few months. We all know that Vista is a crappy program, but I run a business and I need a program that works with whatever crappy program Microsoft puts out. Please, can anyone give me suggestions about how to re-enable these functions when Vista disables them?
Thanks in advance!
Alycia

for Office 2007, see if this Microsoft product will work for you
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=4D951911-3E7E-4AE6-B059-A2E79ED87 041&displaylang=en

In firefox 4 RC, some addons installed suddenly disappear, but checking the profile, some of the missing addons related files are still here, how to make the addons back?

I use firefox 4 form beta 9 to RC (zh) now and there are also firefox 3.6 installed in computer. One day when I open Fx 4 RC, some (actually a lot but not all) of the adoons just disappear. When I check on about:addons page, some addons installed do not appear in the list.
The addons '''REMAINED''' including:
* addons I already used in Fx 3.6 (like webmail notifie , xmarks)
* ''addons only can use in Fx 4'' (like Open Web Apps for Firefox).
The addons '''DISAPPEARED''' including:
* addons I already used in Fx 3.6 (like yoono)
* '' addons installed when using Fx 4'' (like updatescanner, Thumbnail Zoom).
But when I check the profile(by Help > Troubleshooting Information>Open Containing Folder) , some (not sure is it all) of the missing addons related files are still here [lucky], so any one know how to make the missing addons back?
Some more details:
* This happened when i use RC for already a few days and keep on even i restart Fx and windows.
* The bookmarks, history, search engine and even themes and icon setting are still here. [ I only sync bookmarks but not history for both xmarks and firefox sync.]
* This addons are really '''disappeared''' but not disable only!
* This number of addons missed, as i remember, at least 30, should be more than that number bacause some of them are installed but in disable mode.
* I try to install back one of the addons - Stylish, the installed code are still here.
* It is nearly an impossible mission to install every missing addons again, as it really kill my time.

Delete the files extensions.* (extensions.rdf, extensions.cache, extensions.ini, extensions.sqlite) and compatibility.ini in the Firefox [[Profiles|profile folder]] to reset the extensions registry. New files will be created when required.
See "Corrupt extension files": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_install_themes_or_extensions
If you see disabled, not compatible, extensions in "Tools > Add-ons > Extensions" then click the Tools button at the left side of the Search Bar to do a compatibility check.

I am running InDesign CS5.5 and trying to open an In Design File but getting an error message. " Cannot open the file "PDavidLCover.indd". Adobe InDesign may not support the file format, a plug-in that supports the file format may be missing, or the file

I am running InDesign CS5.5 and trying to open an In Design File but getting an error message. " Cannot open the file "PDavidLCover.indd". Adobe InDesign may not support the file format, a plug-in that supports the file format may be missing, or the file me be open in another application."Please help I really need to get this file open.

Since you've shown us the folder contents it's a good bet it isn't in use (no lock file). And it doesn't look like the file is mis-named as there doesn't seem to be anything else there that would be the .indd file (but just in case, open it in TextEdit and paste the first few lines here so we can see what the file header says), so the most likely case is the file is damaged. Is that on a removable device of some sort?
You can try the tool at Repair corrupt InDesign Adobe files on Mac OS X or send me a link to the file by private message and I'll try the recovery tool I have for Windows.

Has anyone found a quick, permanent solution to the missing iTunes.msi file. It's very frustrating that I can't uninstall or reinstall. I have a new iphone and I'm dead in the water:)

Has anyone found a quick, permanent solution to the missing iTunes.msi File? I have tried many times to upgrade both itune and quicktime and get the same old error notice. Surely, by now, someone has found out how to get around this mess. Please....

(1) Download the Windows Installer CleanUp utility installer file (msicuu2.exe) from the following Major Geeks page (use one of the links under the "DOWNLOAD LOCATIONS" thingy on the Major Geeks page):
http://majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4459
(2) Doubleclick the msicuu2.exe file and follow the prompts to install the Windows Installer CleanUp utility. (If you're on a Windows Vista or Windows 7 system and you get a Code 800A0046 error message when doubleclicking the msicuu2.exe file, try instead right-clicking on the msicuu2.exe file and selecting "Run as administrator".)
(3) In your Start menu click All Programs and then click Windows Install Clean Up. The Windows Installer CleanUp utility window appears, listing software that is currently installed on your computer.
(4) In the list of programs that appears in CleanUp, select any iTunes entries and click "Remove", as per the following screenshot:
(5) Quit out of CleanUp, restart the PC and try another iTunes install. Does it go through properly this time?

I can´t find windows support files for boot camp

I can´t find windows support files for boot camp

Boot Camp Assistant
If you can't download, go to Network control panel and check your settings there, look to see if there is more than one interface listed. And turn off "Auto-proxy setting" and see if that helps, it does in half the cases.
The only thing really needed would be a small Apple Software Update for Windows program to pull the drivers down while running Windows. Just that one program, which could update itself as happen with 2.0 and 2.1 version.
As it is, downloads can take 8 hrs for a tiny 620MB package. Strange. True. Been like this.

[grub2] Missing "*.gmo" "*.mo" files in /boot/grub/locale/

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

[grub2] Missing ".gmo" ".mo" files in /boot/grub/locale/