Gw to multiple addresses/contacts for same account

does anyone send multiple GW letters out at the same time for the same account?  Thinking that there may be 3 or 4 contacts or departments at each company who might be able to help.  figure it cant hurt, but has anyone done this and had success? any other thoughts or considerations?

Can you also post the query for people who read this post and are also looking for an answer?
Regards,
Johan Louwers.

Similar Messages

  • I have multiple devices on the same account, can I increase my cloud allowance without paying extra?

    Each device gives 5gig but multiple devices on the same account don't increase the cloud space. Do Apple recognise this and help?

    Malcolm wrote:
    Wow that's really harsh. Both my wife and daughter have disabilities and the idea of having one ID is to allow me to be able to track them quickly in times of emergency through 'find my iphone'. I did not realise this was 'creating a mess'.  I thought support communities were intended to, you know, support people with genuine questions like mine not to rush to criticism. Unfortunately both answers to my question have been negative.
    I am not being harsh, the truth is you are really creating problems for yourself e.g. calendars, contacts, etc. are all mixed up.
    Support Communities are there to show you how to use the devices as intended, the "criticism" is about how you use the devices and not about you as a person. We are trying to help if you can listen.
    You can use Find My Friends instead of Find My iPhone for your purpose.

  • I have an Apple ID with a single  e mail address. I want to set multiple addresses in the same ID. Can I? If so how?

    I have an Apple ID with a single  e mail address. I want to set multiple addresses in the same ID. Can I? If so how?

    Howdy there johnzcarp,
    As I understand it you want to have more than 1 email address under your Apple ID. You can have what are called Alternate Email addresses associated with your Apple ID and this article will help you get those setup:
    Manage your Apple ID primary, rescue, alternate, and notification email addresses
    Alternate email address
    You can add one or more alternate email addresses for use with Apple services such as Game Center, FaceTime, Find My Friends, iMessage, and OS X notifications.
    Go to My Apple ID (appleid.apple.com).
    Select “Manage your Apple ID” and sign in.
    Add an alternate address:
    Select Add Email Address, then enter your alternate address. Apple will send a verification email to that address. Didn't receive the email?
    Follow the instructions in the email to verify the address.
    Edit an alternate address:
    Select Edit next to the address, then enter the new address. Apple will send a verification email to that address. Didn't receive the email?
    Follow the instructions in the email to verify the address.
    Delete an alternate address: Select Delete next to the address.
    Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
    Take care,
    Sterling

  • How do I set up two email address on the same account?

    Using Mail in Mac OS X 10.6.2 and moving to Mac for the first time, I have been unable to set up two email addresses on the same account. Entering them, separated by commas, as advised in the Help does not seem to work. I have tried making them both the same password and have tried separating the passwords with a comma but no luck. Unable to set up another account for the second address because it correctly tells me that the account already exists.
    Is there a way?
    Thanks for any help.
    AllanGlen

    After a comprehensive trial and error session, using a new Guest Account each time to be sure of no contamination from the previous trial, I have finally cracked it!
    The problem was logging on to the outgoing server.
    Setting up the first account was fairly straightforward but if I allow Mail to do it automatically I am unable to send because Mail has defaulted to 'Authentication Required' when my server does not require it. Setting the account manually without authentication enables send and receive to work OK.
    If i try to set up the second account automatically, Mail crashes.
    If I set it up manually and choose 'No Authentication', Mail crashes.
    If I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the full email address as the User Name together with password, Mail crashes.
    If I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the first part of the email address together with password, Mail crashes.
    However, if I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the first part of the email address as User Name and no password, Mail accepts it and sets up the account.
    At this point the account receives mail but cannot send it.
    If I go into the Mail preferences and try to edit the outgoing server details, Mail will not accept no Authentication.
    I eventually found that if I uncheck the 'Always Use This Server' box, all account then use the server on the first account, which is correctly set up.
    Now I have my four email accounts all able send and receive.
    One little concern remains. In Outlook Express I could look at the properties of a received email and see what address it had come from, together with many other details. I haven't found out yet whether this can be done in Mail. I just wonder whether if I reply to some email, it will appear to have come from a different address from the one it was sent to.
    Thanks again for all the inputs.
    Allan

  • Sql query to find all contacts for an account

    I wonder if someone wrote an sql query to find all contacts for an account number in Oracle customer master. We are on EBS 11.5.10.
    I am also looking for sql query to find all ship to addresses for an account number.
    Thanks.

    Can you also post the query for people who read this post and are also looking for an answer?
    Regards,
    Johan Louwers.

  • Invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer

    Hi Team,
    I just wanted to know if we can create manual invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer?
    For project based invoice request i have create based on single invoice request.
    Appreciate your input here.
    Thanks,
    Nitin

    Dear Ratish,
    Thanks for yr reply.
    I already did that but it is not serving business purpose.
    Comm payment  - comes diff time than sales payment.
    so ,I will post one entry customer will get hit with total amount Sales + commission
    like below
    Let say 10, 000 is the sales value and 500 is the commission
    So , This entry will get posted
    Customer Db- 10,500
    Sales Cr- 10,000
    Comm Income Cr- 500
    But, As I said sales amt will be paid before so We need to clear it partially and some time customer pays also diff amount due to some defect.
    So, We wont be knowing for which case we have or havnet received the payment against commission.
    As , Customer account is got hit with total amount( Sales+ Comm..value).
    Pls advise how to solve this.
    Regards,
    Sukh

  • How do I add multiple addresses/contacts in an email tread to my contact list without having to enter each at a time?

    How do I add multiple addresses/contacts in an email tread to my contact list without having to enter each at a time? I have AppleScript but don't see "add address" in any of the boxes/drop-downs. 

    Sorry, but Address Book does not allow you to select more than one email address to send to in a group. There's really no reason why people need multiple copies of a message, anyway; they have the option of forwarding email to another email address of theirs.
    Mulder

  • Multiple tax lines for same item

    Hi,
    Is it possible to have multiple tax lines for same item in an invoice in AR.
    Business Need - A few items have multiple tax applicable ( e.g. VAT, Service tax, etc ). And for regulatory purpose customer wants to show each tax separately.
    please Advise.
    thanks,
    K

    Hi Hikumar,
    With tax groups you have what is called compound taxes.
    A tax group is consisted of more than one tax codes and these tax codes may be related or not to each other,you can also specify the precedence of the tax codes in a tax group.
    On the Invoice or order item line, the tax group code is entered and the tax engine calculates the tax for each tax code that belongs to the tax group.
    If the user wants to see the taxes of this line he will see detailed the tax amounts and rates of each tax code that belong to this group.
    In my case i have used a tax group with 3 tax codes with the structure:
    Item line amount 1000
    1)The first line is a specific sales tax(12%) with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*12%=120
    2)The second line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount calculated from the first tax of the group=120*23%=27,6
    3) The third line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*23%=230
    For each item line that has the above tax group, the system creates three seperate tax lines
    Your case does not seem so complicate as mine.
    You can find more information on the AR user guide and the Oracle receivables tax manual.
    On which Ebs version are you working on?
    If you sent me more detailed you requirement i can quide you on the way to implement it and test it.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Olga

  • Folder is empty on second computer. I have installed adobe CC on two different computers for same account so I can work at two different places. I uploaded files to it yesterday and I can't find it on the CC folder on second computer. What can I do?

    I have installed adobe CC on two different computers for same account so I can work at two different places. I uploaded files to it yesterday and I can't find it on the CC folder on second computer. What can I do?

    Hi DeafScientist,
    Please try the below mentioned links.
    Creative Cloud Help | Browse, sync, and manage assets
    Error: "Unable to sync files"
    Creative Cloud File Sync | Known issues
    Kindly revert if you are unable to sync files.
    Thanks,
    Atul Saini

  • Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

    The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
    time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
    Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
    with such simple but important tasks.
    I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added. 
    One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
    find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based  on your email history and social media accounts setup.
    And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
    To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list)  that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
    result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
    Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook  2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
    As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
    random contacts.
    From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on  based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
    address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
    And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
    We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
    (And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
    ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
    Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
    book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
    If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave),  no results are found at all.
    Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
    I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields. 
    Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding  their info and
    I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
    ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
    For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
    In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
    only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
    ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
    Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply  cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
    field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing  that would prevent them from showing up in results.
    These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
    address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
    For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
    main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
    Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

    Thanks for your reply.
    1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
    I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
    2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
    already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
    Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
    local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
    Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
    ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
    Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book! 
    In summary:
    We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
    We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
    There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
    There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
    Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
    One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
    I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
    I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

  • Mavericks can't sync contacts need to sync multiple family iPhones to same account but keep contacts in separate groups

    Both my wife and son have iPhones and prior to mavericks I was able to sync contacts through iTunes and select which group of contacts synced with the phone so for instance my son would only see his contacts and my wife her own,but the imac would hold the master back up
    I cannot see anyway to do this now as the only way to sync contacts appears to be through icloud.i can't find any support documents to explain what happens if I turn icloud sync on as all it says on iphone is merge contacts which presumably would then put all contacts on each phone
    Does anyone know how I could achieve the desired goal?

    1 person = 1 account
    iCloud is for individual use, so if 5 people share the same account they will get all of the contacts (and calendar events) in the account. Kinda messy.
    Give each person their own account in iCloud and their own user account on the Mac.
    iTunes can still be shared with a seperate ID for all to use.
    Syncing via iTunes has nothing to do with iCloud, and is no longer possible with Mavericks.

  • Setting up multiple devices on the same account

    In my house, we have 2 iPhones, 2 iPods, and an iPad mini.  Seems like everytime we add a device, they are registering under the same account.  How do I correct that problem without restoring each device?

    Malcolm wrote:
    Wow that's really harsh. Both my wife and daughter have disabilities and the idea of having one ID is to allow me to be able to track them quickly in times of emergency through 'find my iphone'. I did not realise this was 'creating a mess'.  I thought support communities were intended to, you know, support people with genuine questions like mine not to rush to criticism. Unfortunately both answers to my question have been negative.
    I am not being harsh, the truth is you are really creating problems for yourself e.g. calendars, contacts, etc. are all mixed up.
    Support Communities are there to show you how to use the devices as intended, the "criticism" is about how you use the devices and not about you as a person. We are trying to help if you can listen.
    You can use Find My Friends instead of Find My iPhone for your purpose.

  • Multiple ipods on under same account

    Is it possible to use multiple ipod systems under the same account? I have a nano that is currently synced with my itunes and I recently found my old mini that still works. I have thought I could download my kids' songs on the mini that way if something happens to it, I won't be upset.
    SG

    I currently sync my old iPod for Video 5G, my 1st Gen iPod Touch, my 3rd Gen iPod Touch, my iPhone 3G, and my new iPhone 4 all to the same library using the same account.
    I seem to recall that before it used to allow me to sync multiple devices at the same time, as long as I had open USB ports to plug them into. I have recently seen that now, if I have an iPod Touch or iPhone connected & syncing, the computer doesn't seem to see a second one if it is connected, but as soon as the first device is ejected, the second one is picked-up and synced just fine.

  • Two different retrieval results on two spreadsheets for same account

    I am encountering some very bizarre retrieval behavior that I've never seen before. The version is 11.1.1.3. I have a dynamically calculated account, which produces a Contract-to-date value for Net Sales.
    The formula is:
    IF(@ISMBR("Jan"))
    @MDSHIFT("CTD Sales", 24, "Period", , -1, "Years", ) + "Net Sales";
    ELSE
    @PRIOR("CTD Sales") + "Net Sales";
    It's always worked correctly as far as I can determine. I took a copy of the outline and put it in my dev system and have been working on some other development. In testing, I noticed that my CTD Sales wasn't retrieving the correct number. This is on a spreadsheet with multiple other accounts on it. It works fine up through FY12, then in January of FY13 and thereafter, produces incorrect numbers, with no apparent pattern of error. So I put just the Net Sales and CTD Sales members onto another spreadsheet, without all of the other stuff, and retrieved that, and it produced the correct numbers. It's not a matter of having a spreadsheet formula in the retrieval spot that I've forgotten about (I've done that before). I also copied the spreadsheet with the wrong numbers, and retrieved in Smart View (was retrieving in Essbase add-in before), and got the same wrong numbers.
    In addition, I actually have three dynamically calculated CTD accounts on the sheet, and the bizarre behavior is happening for all three. With all of the other accounts on the sheet, wrong numbers. With only those accounts on the sheet, correct numbers.
    Also, for more information, one of my calculation scripts uses these CTD members, and it is producing the correct result, so this appears to be isolated purely to spreadsheet retrieval.
    So how can the same exact dimension intersection produce two different numbers on two different spreadsheets? Why would having other account members on a spreadsheet affect the results of one of the accounts? Has anyone ever encountered this before?
    Sabrina

    are you sure you have same combinations from rest of dimensions in both spreadsheets...like retrieving for same month ???Absolutely, 100% sure.
    Also does the difference exists for all months retrieval or only for Jan retrieval?It starts in January and the difference continues for the rest of the months/years after. The amount it's off by changes each year, but remains the same for each month in the year. So Jan through Dec of FY13 are all off by 50,321,000. Jan through Dec of FY14 are all off by 186,378,000. Jan through Dec of FY15 are all off by 351,757,000.
    Also note that if you have a retrieval as shown in the screenshot in the following link... for the last 5 months (AUG to DEC) under FY11 will actually retreive for FY12. this is a wierd behaviour.No, I have the year above each month.
    Sabrina
    Edited by: SabrinaD on Aug 3, 2010 12:31 PM

  • Multiple Apple TV on same account

    Can I put 10 ATV's on the same account using home sharing for ATV 2 generation?
    How many streams can I see in the same time using ATV?

    I am trying to due something similar. I am trying to attach 16 ATV to a tv wall to slideshow some pictures. I ran into trouble after 5 and I am still looking for a work around. There seems to be a limitation to 5 ATV per homesharing account. In case of pictures, which are not DRM protected, I would have thought the limitation would not have applied. I am still trying to see if I can work around it but have not gotten to the answer. If you figure it out, please post the solution. :)
    Thanks,
    Eduardo

Maybe you are looking for