Hashtable insert failed. Load factor too high : Dot net 4.5

I'm getting an exception “System.InvalidOperationException: Hashtable insert failed. Load factor too high.”
My application is developed in VS2010 with 4.0 framework and it is working fine in our development environment (4.0 version ) (for 4.0 framework I'm able to find the hotfix and I've installed it in my development environment). In production environment
framework is upgraded to 4.5 version and we often getting the mentioned exception.
Application developed : windws 7 - 32 bit OS / vb.net 4.0
Development environment (hotfix installed) :  windows server 2008 - 64 bit  / dotnet FW 4.0
Prod Environment : windows server 2008 - 64 bit / dotnet FW 4.5 
Kindly help me resolving this issue.
Thanks.

Hello,
For this issue, we will focus on your new posted thread:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/a3feddfd-ff21-438c-9704-661375f096af/is-that-the-hot-fix-kb2803754-included-in-net-framework-451-version-4550938?forum=clr#a3feddfd-ff21-438c-9704-661375f096af
>>Can you conform that the hot fix KB2803754 available in the version
4.5.50938 (.NET Framework 4.5.1) ?
You could do a test in the link above to check if the .NET 4.5.1 contians this KB(currently I do not have  an proper environment to test it).
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Similar Messages

  • OWB 10g - The time taken for data load is too high

    I am loading data on the test datawarehouse server. The time taken for loading data is very high. The size of data is around 7 GB (size of flat files on the OS).
    The time it takes to load the same amount of data on the production server from the staging area to the presentation area(datawarehouse) is close to 8 hours maximum.
    But, in the test environment the time taken to execute one mapping (containing 300,000 records)is itself 8 hours.
    The version of Oracle database on both the test and production servers is the same i.e., Oracle 9i.
    The configuration of the production server is : 4 Pentium III processors (2.7 GHz each), 2 GB RAM, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, 8 kilobyte primary memory cache, 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache, 440.05 Gigabytes Usable Hard Drive Capacity, 73.06 Gigabytes Hard Drive Free Space
    The configuration of the test server is : 4 Pentium III processors (2.4 GHz each), 1 GB RAM, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, 8 kilobyte primary memory cache,
    512 kilobyte secondary memory cache, 144.96 Gigabytes Usable Hard Drive Capacity, 5.22 Gigabytes Hard Drive Free Space.
    Can you guys please help me to detect the the possible causes of such erratic behaviour of the OWB 10g Tool.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Harshad Borgaonkar
    PwC

    Hello Harshad,
    2 GB of RAM doesn't seem to be very much to me. I guess your bottleneck is I/O. You've got to investigate this (keep an eye on long running processes). You didn't say very much about your target database design. Do you have a lot of indexes on the target tables and if so have you tried to drop them before loading? Do your OWB mappings require a lot of lookups (then apropriate indexes on the lookup table are very useful)? Do you use external tables? Are you talking about loading dimension or fact tables or both? You've got to supply some more information so that we can help you better.
    Regards,
    Jörg

  • Which CPU heatsink/fan for Z77A-GD65? - if 90 C at 100% load is too high?

    With stock Intel heat sink and keeping the CPU (i7 3770) load at 100% for hours, the CPU  temp hovers around 89-90 C.   My case has 2 x 120 mm fans in the front and 2 x 120 mm  fans on the back of the case, .  With the room temperature of 20-22 C, the typical idle CPU Temp is 30-32 C.
    Two questions please.
    1) Is keeping the CPU temperature at 90 C all day  "safe"? 
    2) What after market  heat-sink would would recommend for this MB, if the temperature should be dropped few degrees. 
    My observation for Z77A-GD65: There isn't much real-estate around the CPU for a large coolers and furthermore, my case cannot fit one of those tall  cooler heat sinks with 120 mm fan on the fins.
    I don't overclock, but run multiple CPU intensive simulations.
    i7 3770,
    Z77A-D65 MB,
    Corsair 750TX PSU,
    Corsair Veangeance LP 4 x 8GB RAM ( CML16GX3M2A1600C10)
    using internal INTEL graphics and I have 5 x 1TB HDD's of various brand.

    UPDATE: 
    Thank you again for the good suggestions.
    I installed Arctic Freezer 13 CO cooler and the temp dropped about 25 C from 90C to 65C with 100% CPU load (my simulation program) for nearly 10 hours.
    Tested on Prime95 => 71 C max after 10 hours.  Before the upgrade, I dared not run prime95 because the temperature would quickly shoot up above 90C.
    IntelBurnTest 2.54 Max Stress => 80 C max
    The 92mm cooler fan clears  barely above the low profile RAM.  It may not fit on high profile RAM( those with high heat spread)  Max RPM is about 2100.  It's very quiet. I cannot  tell apart the cooler fan noise over the case fan noise.  After trying to get optimal fan speed using MB BIOS and MSI Control Center, I decided to turn off smart fan control and leave the fan speed at 100%.  This "CO: Continuous Operation" fan is supposed to last a long time anyway.

  • SD Data Load (Deliveries Too High In Number)

    Hi All,
    I am loading data for application component 11, 12, & 13.
    Filling up of set up table for application component 12 is taking very long time.
    So i am thinking of taking alternative path.
    Say; The company has following Sales Organization -- 1100, 1200, 1300
    Steps:
    1. Clear init from RSA7, delete data from setup table in LBWG, clear q in LBWQ.
    2. Go to T code OLI8BW( Deliveries) enter S. Org. as 1100.
    3. Trigger INIT with data after the setup table is filled for S.Org 1100.
    4. Fill setup table again for other sales org 1200, 1300 and trigger repair full for the respective S.Org 1200, 1300.
    Please let me know if the steps above are correct, if not please mention the correct steps.
    Thanks..
    Regards
    Madhusudan

    Hi,
    Assuming as your setting LO data load flow for application 12 for the first time.
    So your data source won't be exist at RSA7/LBWQ.
    first of all need to lock source system/related t codes.
    1. Delete(LBWG) and fill(oLI8BW) the setup tables as you need
           a. selections for sales org  - 1100.
    2. trigger info pack with data , so sales org 1100 data will be moved to PSA and delta pointer will set to your data source, data source will visible at RSA7. PSA data you can load to further data targets.
    3. Fill setup tables for Slaes org - 1200 and 1300
    4. Run repair full request with selections on Sales org - 1200 and 1300. Load same data from psa to further targets.
    5. Select V3 update method and schedule V3 job run to load delta records from source/SM13/LBWQ to RSA7.
    6. unlock source system.
    7. once you see records at RSA7, you can load delta records into bw by using delta info pack.
    Thanks

  • Ms word95 to pdf - "security level too high"?

    I'm a brand new user of Acrobat 9.0 (on XP system) - all kinds of problems (including major file crash and loss during 9.0  installation - more on that later). for now, I need to get started immediately on converting some MS Word doc files to pdfs - What I get from 9.0 is the message that "The Security Level is Too High".   If it's referring to the MS word docs, they are unprotected (I've checked and tried several - Word shows they are not protected, and as far as I know, never have been).  They were originally created on a mac with macWord - but were not protected and converted to windows with MacDrive7.  They show in MS Word in good condition and unprotected.  What do I need to do to get them into acrobat and into pdf format? I've also check the knowledge base here and elswhere without any clues except one chap who seemed to be having similar problems (along with serious crashes) using 8.1. Other than that, I'm mistified.
    I've also tried using the context menu 'covert to pdf' method and also creating a new pdf (blank) and inserting them.  In both cases the security message aborted the process.  Need to do this right away. I'm not technically skilled, so if someone can give me some clear instructions I'd be grateful.  - red

    Thank you all for responding so quickly. First, I'll mention the serious message and a warning. DO NOT INSTALL ACROBAT 9.0 IN AN ENVIRONMENT WITH WORD 7.0 (or any old(er) MS Word version before 2k).  The consequences are ghastly, including the deletion of half or more of your program files (including your email clients, av software and other primary programs), the corruption of your browser, registry (including restore points) and other not so nice events - worse than most bad viruses.  That's a problem Adobe and I will probably be taking a look at next week. Mean time, they indicate that they are going to add the matter to their KB and elswhere so that users have a heads-up on the issue.
    As for the conversion problem from Word 7.0 .doc to .pdf - Bill, you just about nailed it. It was, indeed, a problem that could be circumvented by going to the printer dialog and setting the printer to  'Adobe pdf file' (something a novice wouldn't think of, nor line tech-support for that matter.).  As far as Word/pdf 'printer' is concerned you're just printing the file. However, as I understand things, that's how Adobe attaches the Word documents - It does it through the printer interface. Once that setting is changed to 'Adobe pdf printer' the file is simply picked from the print queue (or before) and loaded into A9. Save it from A9, and the job is done.  So, Bill, If Adobe hadn't found the answer, I do believe you would have been telling me exactly how to do it after a few more posts. The credit, though, goes to Neo Johnson, tech-support supervisor in New Delhi.  The last two days (almost 9 hours of phone time) were spent with various tech-support agents at Adobe; but,  he was the one who finely thought about the interaction between A9 and Word and figured it out.
    Ok -that's the brief.  The rest is a little history/background for whomever is interested (skip, otherwise - not important).  The problem begins with failure to install - first, setup can't find the msi file - it was there, and I browsed it, so that was solved. Then 'invalid licensing - process stopped' messages appear. That was a little tougher and http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405970.html  and some other articles had me doing repair, reinstall, and other complex (for me) procedures. One of the problems was that flexnet had failed to install, which was a stumper for me (I couldn't find it to download separately - barely knew what it was/did - and finally understood that Adobe was supposed to install it. After that,  I did several uninstalls, to no effect. Finally I did a few moderate and then deep uninstalls (with Revo) and several reinstalls. Things got progressively worse.  On one reboot, my desktop came up and all the program icons were broken links.  I examined targets and such and then went to my 'program files' directory. To my horror, nearly all my primary program (including thunderbird email client, AVG etc.)  files had disappeared. The folders were simply empty.  Firefox still loaded, but the tabs were non functional.  Several checks and some light disc analysis indicated the files vanished. No trace. However, my document folders and data were intact (also backed-up). I went to restore and found that all the old restore points (including the one's Revo sets before uninstalling) were gone.  If it had been a virus, it couldn't have done a better job at making a mess of things.  At that point, I knew the registry had been toasted and I was facing a complete OS reinstall.  Instead, I opted for reinstalling some of the critical programs (and because the document files appeared to be intact).  After the first few - thunderbird, firefox etc.  - I was relieve to find that they were picking up on the old settings and restoring themselves to their previous states. I still have a number of these to do - and a few must be re-configured. But that's going ok. 
    Then the saga of Adobe, several phone calls; several times the phone connection was cut off and I had to call again and start over from the beginning with a new person. The matter always had to be esculated to the next tier - more time, more cues, no solutions.  They went over the firefox settings, the adobe settings. They were puzzled about the broken links.  Attempts to open doc files (after a fresh install of winword) were resulting in 'invalid win32 application'. All kinds of problems made progress difficult.  We cleared up the 'invalid....' messages by reparing the file associations (in XP folder options) and then opening the docs in Word and resaving them as something else.  It was a labor.  Finally, there was simply no answer except, like the post here, Word 7 is simply too old and uses different scripting. The only solution was to either buy (ugh, ouch!) Word 2007 (and hope that it would load them and save them in A9 useable form) or, try installing Word2k (which I have) and processing them through that; and, then using Acrobat 8.x to load those and save the pdfs for A9 to use.  However, when Adobe said they could not provide me with a free (even trial) version of 8.x to do the job - licensing problems etc. -- It seemed like a really ugly solution.  Finally, I'm begging Adobe to give me a free copy of 8.x and in steps Neo.  He can't provide the free copy, but he asks a few questions himself.  We go to Adobe and reset some of the security settings (something other agents didn't know or think of). No dice - still can't load the docs.  But then he says, Open up Word. Ok.  load the file and then hit 'print' - ok, the print dialog comes up. 'Now,' he says, 'open the properties and see what printers are listed.'  Ok I do that, and I'll be... 'Adobe pdf printer' is among them.  "Just what I thought," he said, Adobe was hooking up with word, but didn't have its printer to attach." So we set 'Adobe pdf' as the printer and lo and behold, the docs loaded into Adobe as pdfs.  End of that story. (so bill, you had it too - wish you had answered the phone in the first place!)
    Clean up.  So, there's a few simple solutions, I think (though i'm no techie and you folks will certainly have better ideas). First, I don't buy the story that early versions of Word are either 1) unsupported by MS or, 2) nobody uses them, as valid reasons why not to fix the problem of the "unloadable" docs.  I figure there are at least a couple of aproaches and easy patches that will correct the matter. One is from the Word  side - to is to set the current printer setting to use 'Adobe printer', get the file and then reset the printer back to what it was - default.   The other is to patch A9 to detect legacy source applications and bypass things that would normally make the file unloadable, unless, of course, they were actually protected or, read only files. In that case, Adobe could simply inform the user to 'unprotect' them, the same as it now does with its   'Security Setting too High' message for later versions.  I'm sure there are even better ways. But, that would fix things as far as file loading and conversion.
    As to the installation and crash problems - those need to be addressed. Even if its only a few dozen people that might have the same problem, it needs 1) to be given as a noticable warning and keyword in Adobe documents (which now simply indicate that it can process .doc files);  2) it needs to be examined to  insure systems that have Word 7.x or older can install without problem, and certainly without harming their system.  Adobe has a good reputation and does a good job. That's worth protecting with all customers, even if Marketing can't quite see why and the bean counters can't find much profit in the task.  It's what I expect from professionals and to do less certainly subtracts from Adobe's standing. That should be worth a great deal, I would imagine.
    Anyway, thanks folks - got to get some sleept, and then get those pdfs done and sent to people who are waiting for them. - best to you all, red.

  • IMac Hard Drive expectations, Are mine too high?

    Hey everyone.
    I have a 27" iMac i5. Its around 22 months old now and its being used as a personal PC at home.
    Lately, I have been experiencing HDD related issues, It hangs, load times are poor, OS takes ages to boot (windows and OSX)
    I backed up all my data to external drives and did a clean OS restore to Lion. No help, first boot with the OS was just as bad as a boot full of clutter. Loading Windows on the win partition also sometimes gives me the "cannot find OS boot disk" error which is scary.
    Anyway's doing research its all sure tell-tale signs of a failing HDD and ironically last night on my Win7 partition, I got the windows error message saying my "windows detected a hard disk problem, back up all data and contact your manufacture".
    Now, back on topic. Is this reasonable? a $2000+ computer suffering from a hardware fault like this when the HDD has never had more than 30% of the 1TB used in its life? (everything I keep backed up on externals.)
    I was honestly expecting a few more years out of this, **** even my 5 year old Macbook has never had an issue in its life and its been bagged around more places I can think of in its lifetime. How does a computer that sits on a desk suffer for a hardware failure such as this?
    From day one, I had a faulty power board inside, it caused a loud electronic buzzing noise. I did not get this fixed for aroun 9 months as tbh, it sounded normal but in the last month leading upto the replacement, it got much louder over a few days. This was replaced by Apple and I was sent on my way happy it was fixed. could this have caused something to overload?
    I am a little bit bitter which I am sure you can understand, but was my expectation of this hard drive just too high? or am I in my right to be a little upset by this?
    And before anyone askes, I was OS when my warranty ran out, my Macbook, iPad 3XiPhones and Mac Mini are all covered by their own Apple Care. the only thing that isnt is the iMac.. just my luck!
    Edit: the old link for the power board.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737002

    Thanks guys.
    Just got off the phone to Applecare.
    they confirmed my drive is faulty. Im just a little upset it died like this. I have never had a drive fail before. Id rather my externals go than the internal.
    Spoke to Apple, they said that he spoke to his Tech Specalist and they would not offer a free replacement. I agree is its 10 months out of warranty, but even the Apple rep I was speaking too said he would not be impressed either if it was his personal computer
    Oh well. Time to look at HDD Upgrade options! Not that I am totally impressed about it.

  • Battery Wear-Level overnight feels too High!

    Hi,
    Usually i rarely use battery (always put the battery out after charging it) except when i need to take my 4-months-old B480 laptop outside (which is rarely happened)
    Yesterday i leave my battery with ac adapter plugged-in while downloading a large file from internet, i set start charging threshold at 75% and stop at 95% (as many people said it's better not to fully charge the battery), and on the next day i see my battery wear-level became 13% O.o while cycle count is only 5
    I think it's too high for a one-night charging, my old laptop (non-Lenovo) didn't gets this high even when i leave it with ac adapter for days.
    Is this wear-level normal for a one-night charging? (at-least for lenovo laptop that is)
    Does warranty covers an abnormal battery wear-level?
    PS: one of the reason i choose lenovo laptop is because it has customizable-battery charging threshold feature which many people said can be used to prolonged battery lifespan(minimizing wear-level by not fully-charging it and not discharging it too low) even when used with ac adapter, while not many other brands have this kind of feature.

    hi AdamN,
    A usual sign of an imminent battery failure is when it wears out the charge in an abnormal rate (battery goes down to less than 20% overnight after a full charge when unit is off or in sleep state). Sometimes heat can also be a factor to shorten the battery life as discussed in this article.
    To further test the health of the battery, You can try Passmark's BatteryMon. If the battery is failing, you may contact Lenovo for a battery replacement. Support phone list here.
    Hope this helps.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

  • CPU-load factor  climbs up with "sync mapi interface helper x64.exe"

    Hi,
    I use a win 7 64 bit computer with the newest iTunes software, directly loaded from apple homepage. I also use the Outlook 2010 and a iPhone 3GS. All works fine and the synchronisations between OE and 3GS works fine, too.
    Whe the computer works without iTunes and no programm is working, the CPU load faktor is still around 0-2% and the harddisk ist quiet, because there is no reading and writing procedure. So far so good.
    When I startet iTunes and synchronise iTunes with the 3GS, the computer shows after cloosing the iTunes a load factor around  18-24% in a sequence of 2 sec. and also a writing prozess on the hard disk in the same sequence.
    It is very annouing, because the computer is normally quiet.
    Have somebody an idea or an solution?
    Regards.
    Norbert

    pendor wrote:Helpful hint:
    downgrading gnome-session to 2.24.1 (keeping xorg 1.5.3) seems to correct the high CPU usage problem. This  tip comes from the gnome thread. It appears to break gnome screensaver, but I can live with that. Hardware: MSI VR340 laptop with Intel GM965 video.
    Hope it helps.
    Yes this solution works! Thx for the hint! For everybody who forgot how to downgrade packages here the solution:
    I downgraded like this: sudo pacman -U gnome-session-2.24.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
    Maybe you have another gnome-session in your pacman cache. More information about downgrading packages:
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Downgrade_packages
    Still hope that xorg 1.6 will come soon to the official repository

  • HP Pavilion dv7-1130us IDT HD sound card problem: recording levels too high

    I have been trying to get the IDT HD sound card in my HP Pavilion dv7-1130us laptop to allow me to switch from "microphone" to "Line In" input signal. I cannot find an option anywhere in the laptop do this. There is not a separate Line-In jack on the laptop. The mike jack is it.  
    The reason I'm trying to change the input setting is that I am using Audacity/Lame (the Win 7-compatible Beta version) to convert old cassettes to MP3. My laptop came with Vista but I upgraded to Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) earlier this year.
    The problem is that recording levels are way too high using the mike input and so the recording comes out harsh and distorted. I have tried all possible recording level adjustments on the tape deck (no option), IDT sound card control panel, Windows device manager, etc.
    From what I am reading on the online Audacity forums, using a mike input will cause the recording levels to be too high, and the setting has to be changed to "Line In" and not "microphone." Is there not a way to do that with this laptop and sound card?
    The HP Support Assistant tells me that the driver for my sound card is up-to-date.
    Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions. I've been trying to find a solution on my own for a couple days with no luck.

    Hi Amanda,
    Try the following.
    Download the IDT Audio installer on the link below and save it to your Downloads folder.
    http://ftp.hp.com/pub/softpaq/sp52501-53000/sp52658.exe
    When done, open windows Control Panel, open Device Manager and open up Sound, Video and Game Controllers.  Right click the IDT device and select Uninstall - you should also get a prompt to remove the current driver, tick the box to allow this and then proceed with the uninstall.
    When complete, shut down the notebook, unplug the AC Adapter and then remove the battery.  Hold down the Power button for 30 seconds.  Re-insert the battery and plug in the AC Adapter.
    Tap away at the esc key as you start the notebook to launch the Start-up Menu and then select f10 to enter the bios menu.  Press f5 to load the defaults ( this is sometimes f9, but the menu at the bottom will show the correct key ), use the arrow keys to select 'Yes' and hit enter.  Press f10 to save the setting and again use the arrow keys to select 'Yes' and hit enter.
    Let Windows fully load - it will automatically load an audio driver, but just let this complete.  Then open your Downloads folder, right click on the IDT installer and select 'Run as Administrator' to start the installation.  When this has completed, right click the speaker icon in the Taskbar and select Playback Devices.  Left click 'Speakers and Headphones' once to highlight it and then click the Set Default button - check if you now have audio.
    Regards,
    DP-K
    ****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
    ****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
    ****I don't work for HP****
    Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

  • When I print business cards, they sometimes print 1/4 too high but not always.

    I have my business cards in a Word document using an Avery template. I have used the same file for years. I never had a problem with my Canon printer but after buying an HP Photosmart D110 I have had nothing but problems. When I print then they print about 1/4 inch too high ruining the cardstock and wasting ink. This doesn't happen all the time. Sometimes I print and they are perfect but when I go back and print another, the problem returns. This is the same card stock I have used for years and when it is inserted in the printer it doesn't matter if it is a single page or a stack of them. I have tried previewing the page before printing and the alignment is correct. I've tried printing to a PDF and then printing the PDF, same problem. I try it on the Canon and no problem. Only reason I bought this in the first place was the cartridges were cheaper and I do a lot of color printing and scanning!  I have just replaced the cartridges and did a head alignment so that is not the problem. I have tried it with regular paper and the problem persists. I'm ready to drop kick this thing and buy another Canon!
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Did you ever find a solution for this problem? I have no problem printing the business cards out on a Canon printer, or a different HP printer I used to have, but the D110 is nothing but a pain in the you know what !  I'm using publisher and the avery 8371 card stock,  I searched solutions for days and did everything possible but still they're not printing correctly!! I'm dissapointed in this printer, every time I have a problem with something it always seems to be an HP product!!!  Very frustrating because I never had to mess with any settings in the other printers I had, I would just put the file in, change the quality and click the print button with no problems. I'm ready to throw this printer out the window Anyway thanks in advance and I hope somebody can help me with this issue !!! 

  • How Do You Restart a Failing Load Plan

    If a Load Plan step fails, say because of some bad data or a bad join, I know how to correct the error and restart the failing step or the failing task in the Operator.
    How do you restart the failing Load Plan or any higher level step in the Operator?
    Right now my Load Plan steps all say 'Restart from failed task'.
    I can't see the Load Plan itself in the Operator, so I can't restart it directly.

    In the Operator, there is an accordion section labeled "Load Plan Executions". You can restart from there.
    Regards,
    Michael Rainey

  • Accidental​ly set my screen resolution too high

    I was playing around with screen resolutions and accidentally set one too high and now every time i load up my Computer, it says 'Input not supported' , please help me.

    It would help greatly if you:
    A) Identified the installed operating system
    B) Identified your HP desktop PC. (look on the service tag. Post the complete  p/n
    If your OS is Windows 7, start the operating system in Safe Mode. Press the power button and before Windows begins to boot, start tapping the F8 key. Choose Safe Mode.  In Safe Mode click on the start button and type  msconfig in the search all programs and files box . Click on the msconfig icon that appears above to invoke msconfig. In the msconfig dialog choose the Boot tab as in the following image. In Boot options put a tick inside the box to the left of base video, then click on apply and OK. Restart your PC and  right-click an unused area on the desktop and set your resolution. Choose the recommended resolution.  After you do that, go back to the msconfig and remove the tick mark in the Boot options -->Base video, click on OK and restart your PC. All should be back to normal again.
    The desktop I am using has a dual display setup, so yours will appear a bit differently. the operatng system will recommend an optimal resolution and designate it as recommended.
    Best regards,
    erico
    ****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
    2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

  • Firmware version is too high. How uninstall? Correct version where?

    Help! That Firmware thing is driving me nuts. Wish apple would organize the latest upgrades by OS. It’s a maze.
    My iMac DV (blue front slot loading) is OS 9.0.4 (I will upgrade but not right now, too long to explain).
    I had bought a LaCie HD some years ago & made partition with OS 9.0.4, 9.1 to 9.2, it fell, bought another and installed it.
    After much time I found out that to know my version of Firmware I have to look for boot ROM, my system profiler says it’s $0004.19f1 that means probably v 4.19.
    If it’s v 4.1.9 it is too high it needs OS 9.1 and probably happened with I had OS 9.1 on my external HD. My LaCie CD Writer became a nightmare and I don’t dare to use it anymore, maybe it was because of the firmware ….or it might be that Apple CD/DVD Driver can’t exist at the same time as Toast extensions, it’s unclear to me.
    Can’t find the latest firmware version for OS 9.0.4 that will work, or how I can take it off before I install another one. I know v2.4 will work on OS 9.0.4.
    Got: Firewire v2.3.3 - usb v 1.4.2 - CarbonLib v 1.6 - Apple CD/DVD Driver v 1.3.5 player is v2.1
    Help!
    1. What’s the latest Firmware for OS 9.0.4?
    2. Do I have Firmware v 4.1.9?
    3. How do I uninstall Firmware v 4.1.9?
    4. CAN Apple CD/DVD Driver exist at the same time as Toast extensions?
    Thanks very much
    Nicky

    I think that you misunderstood Kappy's point about Mac OS X version.
    What the information about OS X version is telling you is that those are the minimum requirements for the installer which places the firmware update permanently in the ROM on the logic board to run. However, once the firmware has been installed you are free to continue to update your version of Mac OS X for as long as Apple releases them.
    I have an iMac G3 DV+ which has ROM version 4.1.9f1 and is running Mac OS X 10.4.8.
    However, the firmware is backwards compatible as well. You obviously installed the firmware when you were running OS 9.1, but at some time regressed your OS to 9.0.4.
    I think the issues that you are experiencing are related to other issues on your Mac. The folks in the iMac G3 forum should be able to help you sort that out.

  • Help! RE: Bitrate Too High!!

    I'm still using DVD StudioPro 2. I've imported the ".m2v" and ".aif" files generated from iMovie2 and Quicktime. I used a 2 pass variable option.
    After loading both files into DVD/SP2, when I try to simply "build" the file, it goes 20%, then gives me the error message, "Video Bitrate Too High." I've gone back into preferences and changed many times, even trying a one pass, with '5' as the highest rate, but still get the same error message.
    The DVD project is a 10 minute promo for a company...no menus, just auto play. I can't problem solve why it's doing this.
    Help?
    Matthew

    Matthew,
    Keep in mind that you need to include the AIF bitrate into your calculations. If you encoded your video using a variable bitrate (regardless of single or dual pass) and it peeks at anything over 8.2, you'll exceed the maximum bitrate of 9.8 (given that AIF stereo files are typically 1.536Mb/s).
    One way to try correcting this is by encoding your AIF files into Dolby Digital or DTS.
    Some of the info I wrote up in my FAQ-O-Matic may help...
    http://nedron.net/cgi-bin/suid/dnedrow/fom?file=34
    -David

  • Disk Transfer (reads and writes) Latency is Too High

    i keep getting this error:
    the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter  has been exceeded.
    i got these errors on the following servers:
    active directory
    SQL01 (i have 2 sql clustered)
    CAS03 (4 cas server loadbalanced)
    HUB01
    MBX02(Clustered)
    a little info on our environment:
    *Using SAN storage.
    *Disks are new ,and working fine
    *the server has GOOD hardware components(16-32 Gb RAM;Xeon or quadcore........)
    i keep having these notifications everyday; i searched on the internet and i found the cause to be 1 of the 2:
    1) disk hardware issue( non common=rarely )
    2) the queue time on the hard-disk( time to write on the Hard-disk)
    if anyone can assist me with the following:
    1) is this a serious issue that will affect our enviroment?
    2) is it good to edit the time of monitoring to be 10minute(instead of the default 5min)
    3) is there any solution for this?(to prevent these annoying -useless??--- notifications)
    4)what is the cause of this queue delay;;and FYI sometime this happens when nothing and noone is using the server (i.e the server is almost Idle)
    Regards

    The problem is....  exactly what the knowledge of the alert says is wrong.  It is very simple.  Your disk latency is too high at times. 
    This is likely due to overloading the capabilities of the disk, and during peak times, the disk is underperforming.  Or - it could be that occasionally, due to the design of your disks - you get a very large spike in disk latency... and this trips the
    "average" counter.  You could change this monitor to be a consecutive sample threshold monitor, and that would likely quiet it down.... but only doing an analysis of a perfmon of several disks over 24 hours would you be able to determine specifically
    whats going on.
    SCOM did exactly what it is supposed to do.... it alerted your, proactively, to the possible existence of an issue.  Now you, using the knowledge already in the alert, use that information to further investigate, and determine what is the corrective
    action to take. 
    Summary
    The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer (LogicalDisk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer) for the logical disk has exceeded the threshold. The logical disk and possibly even overall system performance may significantly diminish which will result in poor operating system and application
    performance.
    The Avg. Disk sec/ Transfer counter measures the average rate of disk Transfer requests (I/O request packets (IRPs)) that are executed per second on a specific logical disk. This is one measure of storage subsystem throughput.
    Causes
    A high Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter value may occur due to a burst of disk transfer requests by either an operating system or application.
    Resolutions
    To increase the available storage subsystem throughput for this logical disk, do one or more of the following:
    •
    Upgrade the controllers or disk drives.
    •
    Switch from RAID-5 to RAID-0+1.
    •
    Increase the number of actual spindles.
    Be sure to set this threshold value appropriately for your specific storage hardware. The threshold value will vary according to the disk’s underlying storage subsystem. For example, the “disk” might be
    a single spindle or a large disk array. You can use MOM overrides to define exception thresholds, which can be applied to specific computers or entire computer groups.
    Additional Information
    The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter is useful in gathering throughput data. If the average time is long enough, you can analyze a histogram of the array’s response to specific loads (queues, request sizes, and so on). If possible, you should
    observe workloads separately.
    You can use throughput metrics to determine:
    •
    The behavior of a workload running on a given host system. You can track the workload requirements for disk transfer requests over time. Characterization of workloads is an important part of performance analysis and capacity planning.
    •
    The peak and sustainable levels of performance that are provided by a given storage subsystem. A workload can either be used to artificially or naturally push a storage subsystem (in this case, a given logical disk) to its limits. Determining these
    limits provides useful configuration information for system designers and administrators.
    However, without thorough knowledge of the underlying storage subsystem of the logical disk (for example, knowing whether it is a single spindle or a massive disk array), it can be difficult to provide an optimized one size fits all threshold value.
    You must also consider the Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter in conjunction with other transfer request characteristics (for example, request size and randomness/sequentially) and the equivalent counters for write disk requests.
    If the Avg. Disk sec/Transfers counter is tracked over time and if it increases with the intensity of the workloads that are driving the transfer requests, it is reasonable to suspect that the logical disk is saturated if throughput does not increase and
    the user experiences degraded system throughput.
    For more information about storage architecture and driver support, see the Storage - Architecture and Driver Support Web site at
    http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=26156.

Maybe you are looking for