Haskell-x11-extras conflicts with a required package?

I've been using Xmonad for a little while now, and have recently aquired a second monitor, so I read up on how to configure dual head setup.  It seems I need to install haskell-x11-extras before reinstalling xmonad.  I use yaourt to do this, and it builds OK with the exception of a few warnings about depricated use of defaultUserHooks (safe to ignore this?).  When it starts to install an error states that this package conflicts with haskell-x11.  So I remove haskell-x11 and try to install haskel-x11-extras again from the .pkg.tar.gz but then I get an error informing me that it requires haskell-x11 !
So I'm stuck in an infinate loop and may have inadvertantly broken time & space.  Sorry about that
Anyone know how I can fix this?  My goal is to use xmonad in dual head setup so if there is another way that avoids the extras package altogether, then I'd like to hear it please.  So far, my mouse pointer can traverse to the second screen and back again but I can't send any apps over to it.
i'm at work at the moment using an inferior operating system, so the above was from memory but if anyone needs me to post the exact ouputs I'll do it when I get home in a few hours.
Thanks

I can confirm the conflict between gnutls and autogen.  Got the same error on "-Syu".  My workaround for right now is to wait for either a new gnutls or autogen.
Edit: I'm x86_64 if that makes any difference.
Last edited by headkase (2012-02-20 09:20:35)

Similar Messages

  • Multilib conflicts with native 64bit packages (gcc-libs and binutils)

    hi all :>
    i tried to build arduino from the AUR on my 64bit system (32bit version runs nice on my netbook! thanks! ). However i can't build it because it depends on gcc-libs-multilib and binutils-multilib from the multilib repo, which are conflicting with gcc-libs and binutils.
    is it safe to remove the 64bit equivalents of gcc-libs and binutils and replace them with gcc-libs-multilib and binutils-multilib?
    best regards :>

    pablox wrote:I know this is an old post, but it's one of the first results on google and actually answers the question... shouldn't it be marked as [SOLVED] ?
    The first poster should mark [solved] if the replies solve the issue for him. I don't think he even read the replies, judging from his lack of response on this thread. Regardless, no reason to bump this thread, we have necro-bumping rules for a reason.
    Closing.

  • Creative Cloud conflicts with existing CS5 package

    Hi. I've seen a few questions kind of like mine, but they haven't really answered what I need to know, so, I've just been sent a promotional mail regarding becoming a full Creative Cloud member which I am considering, but first I'd like to know, how will this affect the package I already have? I have my own copy of the CS5 Web Premium package. Will there be any licensing conflicts? And if I choose to drop the Creative Cloud membership at any time will this cause any problems with the programs I already have?
    Thanks.

    No and no. You are overthinking it. CC is just like any other major upgrade version in the past - it keeps to itself and doesn't do anything to your existing programs. Only the licensing is different this time. Beyond the usual is to be expected - fiel associations and shared components will refer to the latest version, so e.g. invoking Bridge from CS5 may call up Bridge CC, regardless.
    Mylenium

  • Sync not work (exim conflicts with exim)

    Hi,
    i have change the default MTA exim with "Postfix".
    first:
    #pacman -R exim
    after:
    #pacman -S postfix
    and work fine but now:
    # pacman -Syu
    :: Synchronizing package databases...
    current.db.tar.gz        [#################################] 100% |     29K
    unofficial.db.tar.gz     [#################################] 100% |     45K
    :: libidl-0.6.8-2: local version is newer
    error: exim conflicts with exim
    :: Above packages will be skipped.  To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>'
    Any idea.

    apeiro wrote:I followed your steps but could not reproduce the problem.  Do you have an exim-* directory in /var/lib/pacman/local?  Perhaps the remove process did not finish properly.
    I have remove all file of exim but the error it continues.

  • Building Xmonad 0.4.1 with GHC 6.8.1 and haskell-X11 1.3.0 fails

    I've tried to build Xmonad 0.4.1, but it fails with the following output:
    XMonad.hs:42:17:
    Could not find module `Data.Set':
    it is a member of package containers-0.1.0.0, which is hidden
    After a bit of research I discovered that it has something to do with Cabal, but I can't understand how to fix it? Anyone else encountered this and anyone with a possible solution?

    ashren: using your suggestion, I made a patch and modified the AUR PKGBUILD:
    PKGBUILD:
    pkgname=xmonad
    pkgver=0.4.1
    pkgrel=2
    pkgdesc="A lightweight X11 tiled window manager written in Haskell"
    arch=(i686 x86_64)
    url="http://xmonad.org/"
    license=('custom:BSD3')
    depends=('gmp' 'libxext' 'dmenu')
    makedepends=('ghc' 'haskell-x11>=1.3.0')
    source=(http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/$pkgname/$pkgver/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz xmonad-0.4.1-containers-fix.diff)
    build() {
    cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
    patch -p1 < ../xmonad-0.4.1-containers-fix.diff
    runhaskell Setup.lhs configure --ghc --prefix=/usr || return 1
    # configuration handling stuff
    if [ -f ../../Config.hs ]; then
    msg "Custom configuration detected"
    msg2 "copying config.h to build directory"
    cp ../../Config.hs Config.hs
    fi
    # Maybe move this to function ?
    msg "Do you want to change configuration before compilation ? [y/N] "
    read answerpkgname=xmonad
    pkgver=0.4.1
    pkgrel=2
    pkgdesc="A lightweight X11 tiled window manager written in Haskell"
    arch=(i686 x86_64)
    url="http://xmonad.org/"
    license=('custom:BSD3')
    depends=('gmp' 'libxext' 'dmenu')
    makedepends=('ghc' 'haskell-x11>=1.3.0')
    source=(http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/$pkgname/$pkgver/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz xmonad-0.4.1-containers-fix.diff)
    build() {
    cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
    patch -p1 < ../xmonad-0.4.1-containers-fix.diff
    runhaskell Setup.lhs configure --ghc --prefix=/usr || return 1
    # configuration handling stuff
    if [ -f ../../Config.hs ]; then
    msg "Custom configuration detected"
    msg2 "copying config.h to build directory"
    cp ../../Config.hs Config.hs
    fi
    # Maybe move this to function ?
    msg "Do you want to change configuration before compilation ? [y/N] "
    read answer
    answer=$(echo $answer | tr [:upper:] [:lower:])
    if [ $answer = "y" -o $answer = "yes" ]; then
    # maybe user prefer something other than vim ?
    if [ x"$EDITOR" != x"" ]; then
    $EDITOR Config.hs
    else
    vi Config.hs
    fi
    # save modified config for future builds
    cp -f Config.hs ../../Config.hs
    fi
    runhaskell Setup.lhs build || return 1
    runhaskell Setup.lhs copy --destdir=$startdir/pkg
    runhaskell util/GenerateManpage.hs
    install -D -m644 LICENSE $startdir/pkg/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/BSD3
    install -D -m644 man/xmonad.1 $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man1/xmonad.1
    answer=$(echo $answer | tr [:upper:] [:lower:])
    if [ $answer = "y" -o $answer = "yes" ]; then
    # maybe user prefer something other than vim ?
    if [ x"$EDITOR" != x"" ]; then
    $EDITOR Config.hs
    else
    vi Config.hs
    fi
    # save modified config for future builds
    cp -f Config.hs ../../Config.hs
    fi
    runhaskell Setup.lhs build || return 1
    runhaskell Setup.lhs copy --destdir=$startdir/pkg
    runhaskell util/GenerateManpage.hs
    install -D -m644 LICENSE $startdir/pkg/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/BSD3
    install -D -m644 man/xmonad.1 $startdir/pkg/usr/man/man1/xmonad.1
    And you also need this file: xmonad-0.4.1--containers-fix.diff
    Only in xmonad-0.4.1-new: dist
    Common subdirectories: xmonad-0.4.1/man and xmonad-0.4.1-new/man
    Common subdirectories: xmonad-0.4.1/tests and xmonad-0.4.1-new/tests
    Common subdirectories: xmonad-0.4.1/util and xmonad-0.4.1-new/util
    diff -up xmonad-0.4.1/xmonad.cabal xmonad-0.4.1-new/xmonad.cabal
    --- xmonad-0.4.1/xmonad.cabal 2007-11-02 17:31:08.000000000 -0500
    +++ xmonad-0.4.1-new/xmonad.cabal 2007-11-15 13:00:28.041790818 -0600
    @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ license: BSD3
    license-file: LICENSE
    author: Spencer Janssen
    maintainer: [email protected]
    -build-depends: base>=2.0, mtl>=1.0, unix>=1.0, X11==1.3.0
    +build-depends: base>=2.0, mtl>=1.0, unix>=1.0, X11==1.3.0, containers
    extra-source-files: README TODO tests/loc.hs tests/Properties.hs man/xmonad.1.in
    Config.hs-boot util/GenerateManpage.hs man/xmonad.1 man/xmonad.html

  • Need to Install Safari 6.0.2 on a white Intel core duo iMac. Had to throw out 6.0.3 because of conflict with required software. Downloaded wrong version that was for Mountain lion (I am running 10.7.5). It installs but won't open.

    Need to Install Safari 6.0.2 on a white Intel core duo iMac. Had to throw out 6.0.3 because of conflict with required software. Downloaded wrong version that was for Mountain lion (I am running 10.7.5). It installs but won't open, says it is for Mountian Lion.
    Of course I can't throw it away since I get a message it's part of the sytem. I can show package contents and throw those away, but evidently not a good idea!!

    Need to Install Safari 6.0.2 on a white Intel core duo iMac. Had to throw out 6.0.3 because of conflict with required software. Downloaded wrong version that was for Mountain lion (I am running 10.7.5). It installs but won't open, says it is for Mountian Lion.
    Of course I can't throw it away since I get a message it's part of the sytem. I can show package contents and throw those away, but evidently not a good idea!!

  • Flex SDK 4 : mx.chart package and declaration of style 'direction' conflicts with previous declaration problem

    Hi There,
    We have recently downloaded SDK 4 and had configured the same for
    developement in flex builder 3, we are already using SDK 3.0. However
    to our surprise there were compile time error reported for mx.chart
    related classes. To resolve this we thought to import relevant .swc
    like datavisualization, automation from sdk 3.0, and it worked and
    resolved compile time error. But we landed up in on more problem that
    is 'Declaration of style 'direction' conflicts with previous
    declaration in E:\Softwares\FlexBuilder\sdks\SDK 4\frameworks\libs
    \datavisualization.swc(mx/charts/GridLines)'.
    If you could pleas help us to resolve these issues and also if you
    could answer these queries would be good
    1) SDK 4 has been declared to be open source, then why mx.chart
    package is not part of it?
    2) Why would 'Declaration of style 'direction' conflicts with previous
    declaration' occur?
    3) What are the other component and packages that are not part of open
    source for which license is still required?
    Waiting for reponse in anticipation.
    Thanks,

    I got this same error with the following setup.
    1. Building a SWC with Flex 4.0 Beta2 on FlashBuilder4
    2. SWC references other SWC that are built with Flex3.
    3. Define a <mx:ColumnChart id="column" ...> in a Flex4 skin.
    4. Got this compiler error. 
    Any idea if this is not supposed to work? I'm hoping I don't need all referenced swcs to be recompiled with Flex4 SDK. Some of those are external dependency that I do not have source code access.
    Thanks for any help.
    kam

  • Has anybody had the following error while trying to download iTunes 10.5? There is a problem with Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run.

    Has anybody had the following error while trying to download iTunes 10.5? There is a problem with Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run.

    Go to "control panel" then "add or remove programs".  Highlight "Apple software update"  Choose "change" click "Repair"  This should do the trick.  Then download and install iTunes 10.5 again.

  • Tried to install iTunes 10.5 this morning but an error appeared saying "problem with windows installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run." Can someone please help

    I tried to install iTunes 10.5 this morning but an error appeared saying "problem with windows installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run." Can someone please help

    Firstly, are you installing iTunes for the first time or are you updating your current version of iTunes?
    If you're installing iTunes for the first time have you tried redownloading the installer package? Perhaps the file you downloaded originally is corrupted...
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/
    If you've tried that, then try installing iTunes as your computer's administrator. To do this right-click the install package and choose "Run as administrator".
    If you're updating iTunes to the most recent version try repairing the Apple Software Update program on your computer. It's under the add/remove programs.
    1. Open the control panel
    2. Open Add/Remove programs (called "Programs and Features" in Windows 7)
    3. Navigate to "Apple Software Update" in the list and click on it
    4. Click on "Change" then select "Repair" (or just select the repair option in Windows 7)
    Once you repair this, try running iTunes and the update again.
    Fingers crossed!

  • Having trouble trying to install itunes 10.5. Receive message saying 'There is a problem with this installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be found. Please contact product vendor'

    Having trouble trying to install itunes 10.5. Receive message saying 'There is a problem with this installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be found. Please contact product vendor'

    Managed to get the installation sorted. Go to Control Panel, and where you have a list of all installed programs, repair all the Apple/Itunes related programs. Installation worked fine after that. Hopefully it helps you out too!

  • Why is itunes saying "there is a problem with this installer package. a program required for this install to complete could not be run. contact your support personnel or package vendor."

    why is itunes saying "there is a problem with this installer package. a program required for this install to complete could not be run. contact your support personnel or package vendor."

    Go to START > ALL PROGRAMS > Apple Software Update. If it offers you a newer version of Apple Software Update, do it but Deselect any other software offered at the same time. Once done, try another iTunes install
    If you can't find ASU, go to Control Panel:
    XP - Add n Remove Programs
    Win7/Vista - Programs n Features
    Highlight ASU, click change then Repair.

  • [SOLVED] systemd-arch-units conflicts with mdadm and xinetd packages

    Trying to upgrade my testing box today to latest/greatest and running into a file conflict between systemd-arch-linux providing systemd profiles for xinetd and mdadm which also think they control the same files:
    error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
    /usr/lib/systemd/system/mdadm.service exists in both 'mdadm' and 'systemd-arch-units'
    /usr/lib/systemd/system/xinetd.service exists in both 'systemd-arch-units' and 'xinetd'
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    Should I just do a force? I am not relying on systemd yet. Or should I just remove systemd?
    Chester
    Last edited by chetwisniewski (2012-05-15 18:17:45)

    silent wrote:So now the new version of mdadm and xinetd moved to [core] and I have the same conflict with systemd-arch-units in [community].
    Try -Syu again?

  • MRP is conflicting with Sales order requirement Qty and date

    Hi experts,
    We have below scenario:
    Material has the stock 100. It has reorder point 3 and MRP type V2 (Automatic reorder point with external requirements) and planned delivery time 10 days.
    MRP run creates purchase requisition whenever the stock falls below reorder level or/and based on customer orders requirements.
    We created first sales order for Qty 80 and delivery date 03/01/2012.  Qty 80 is confirmed against this sales order.
    We created second sales order for Qty 50 and delivery date 01/31/2012. Now remaining Qty 20 is confirmed against this order. So we have requirements of 30 Qty for this second order.
    When we run MRP, it supposes to create Purchase requisition for Qty 33 (30 + 3) including reorder point (3 Qty). As the delivery date for this order is 01/31/2012 and requirement Qty is 30, and planned delivery time is10 days, MRP run should create purchase requisition. But it is not creating.
    If I change the planned delivery time to 30 days, it is creating purchase requisition. It is considering sales order delivery date of First order (delivery date: 03/01/2012), but not for second order (delivery date: 01/31/2012).
    So MRP is conflicting with Sales order requirement Qty and date.
    Appreciate your help in this regard to resolve the issue
    Thanks,
    Srini

    Hi,
    We are using manual reorder point planning with external requirements (V1)
    Thanks,
    Srini

  • Unresolvable conflict on update (qt conflicts with qt-copy)

    Hi!
    I use Archlinux with kde-svn. And after some time without updating the whole system, I have got this problem since a few days:
    pacman -Syu
    :: Starting full system upgrade...
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    :: qt conflicts with qt-copy. Remove qt-copy? [Y/n] Y
    :: qt conflicts with kdesupport. Remove kdesupport? [Y/n] Y
    error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
    :: vlc: requires taglib
    :: extragear-multimedia: requires kdesupport
    :: kdebase: requires kdesupport
    :: kdebase: requires qimageblitz
    :: kdelibs: requires kdesupport
    :: kdemod-playground-filelight: requires qimageblitz
    :: kdenetwork: requires decibel
    :: koffice: requires kdesupport
    :: tunepimp: requires taglib
    Of course I want to keep kdesupport and qt-copy, but when I say 'n', the update is aborted.
    What could I try to do?
    Thanks in advance.
    The User

    Awebb wrote:Is [haskell] an official arch repo?
    No: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Un … positories
    gauthma wrote:To make matters even weirder, the error messages are about needing version 7.4.2-1 of ghc, but that IS the version I have installed!
    That error says you can't update package foo, because it needs a specific version of package bar and you are about to update bar.
    ghc got updated from version 7.4.2-1 in [extra] to 7.6.1-1 in [testing] and [haskell] still has version 7.4.2-1 at the moment.
    Haskell packages in the official repos have just been updated, so wait a bit until your server gets them or switch to a more up-to-date one.
    As you can see, the packages from [testing] depend on 7.6.1-1 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testi … skell-mtl/
    Edit: [haskell-testing] has the updated packages
    Repository : haskell-testing
    Name : haskell-base64-bytestring
    Depends On : ghc=7.6.1-1
    Last edited by karol (2012-10-04 11:45:31)

  • GHC , haskell-x11, xmonad etc issues.

    Hi,
    I upgraded ghc yesterday (or the day before, not sure) and when rebuilding xmonad I have some issues.
    When upgrading ghc I had this message:
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    checking package integrity...
    (1/1) checking for file conflicts [##############################################] 100%
    ==> Unregistering cabalized packages...
    ==> Done.
    (1/1) upgrading ghc [##############################################] 100%
    ==> All cabalized and yaourt-installed packages need to be reinstalled now.
    ==> See /usr/share/haskell/ and ghc-pkg list --user for a tentative list of affected packages.
    I assume reinstalling them using pacman/yaourt is sufficient. When installing haskell-x11 for instance I have these messages:
    Targets (1): haskell-x11-1.4.5-1
    Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
    Total Installed Size: 3.96 MB
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    checking package integrity...
    (1/1) checking for file conflicts [##############################################] 100%
    ghc-pkg: cannot find package X11-1.4.5
    error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
    (1/1) upgrading haskell-x11 [##############################################] 100%
    Reading package info from stdin ... done.
    X11-1.4.5: dependency base-3.0.3.0 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
    If you like this package, please install aurvote
    and vote for its inclusion/keeping in [community]
    As a consequence haskell-x11 is not available when recompiling xmonad. I have similar messages for xmonad:
    Targets (1): xmonad-0.8.1-1
    Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
    Total Installed Size: 2.93 MB
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    checking package integrity...
    (1/1) checking for file conflicts [##############################################] 100%
    ghc-pkg: cannot find package xmonad-0.8.1
    error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
    (1/1) upgrading xmonad [##############################################] 100%
    Reading package info from stdin ... done.
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency X11-1.4.5 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency base-3.0.3.0 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency containers-0.2.0.0 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency directory-1.0.0.2 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency process-1.0.1.0 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    xmonad-0.8.1: dependency unix-2.3.1.0 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
    error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
    If you like this package, please install aurvote
    and vote for its inclusion/keeping in [community]
    When I downgrade to ghc in extra and reinstall these packages they work fine, and don't have the above dependency error messages. The only error message I keep having is:
    error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
    But this might have been there before. I have no experience in actually using ghc, so maybe I'm missing something?

    It's the right idea, but technically not feasible currently. [community] is maintained by a different set of people than [core], [extra] and [testing] (not only that, they are technically implemented differently at the moment, but devs are working on that about now). So only packages from [core] and [extra] can go through [testing] at present. Hence there is always only one version of a package in [community], and naturally it needs to be in sync with [core/extra], not [testing]. So currently it's assumed that people that use testing are technically skilled enough to know (and know how) to rebuild some community packages that need it.

Maybe you are looking for