Help in joining results

hi experts,
i am newbie, please help me with my sql query
table1
id X
1 1
2 1
3 1
1 1
3 1
table2
id Y
1 1
2 1
4 1
5 1
2 1
required output
id X Y
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 0
4 0 1
5 0 1
my following query produces wrong output, please help me to correct/rewrite it
select id, count(X) from table1 group by id, X
union
select id, count(Y) from table1 group by id, X
many thanks
Raj

One possible way:
SQL> with table1 as (
2     select 1 id, 1 X from dual union all
3     select 2, 1 from dual union all
4     select 3, 1 from dual union all
5     select 1, 1 from dual union all
6     select 3, 1 from dual
7 ), table2 as (
8     select 1 id, 1 Y from dual union all
9     select 2, 1 from dual union all
10     select 4, 1 from dual union all
11     select 5, 1 from dual union all
12     select 2, 1 from dual
13 )
14 --
15 -- end of test data
16 --
17 select
18 nvl(tx.id,ty.id) id,
19 nvl(tx.x,0) x,
20 nvl(ty.y,0) y
21 from (
22     select id, sum(X) X from table1 group by id
23 ) tx
24 full outer join
25 (
26     select id, sum(Y) Y from table2 group by id
27 ) ty
28 on (
29     ty.id = tx.id
30 )
31 order by
32 nvl(tx.id,ty.id);
        ID          X          Y
         1          2          1
         2          1          2
         3          2          0
         4          0          1
         5          0          1

Similar Messages

Help with Joining a few tables

I need a help using JOINS. I plan to create ONE VIEW by bringing in all fields from First and Second table and a few chosen columns from Third, Fourth and Fifth tables. I have put to together below select statement which appears to be working syntax-wise but not efficient and may have dupes.
Table1 - RPT_APRL_PRODUCT with key field KEY_MATERIAL (KEY_MATERIAL = DIVISION||PLAN_CTRY||MKT_TYP_ID||MATERIAL)
Table 2 - RPT_FWEQ_PRODUCT with key field KEY_MATERIAL (KEY_MATERIAL = DIVISION||PLAN_CTRY||MATERIAL)
Table 3 - NSC_PROD_CIMG has a Key Field = MATERIAL_NBR
Table 4- STAGE#EMEA_NSAP.NSC_PROD_REG_CIMG has the Key field MATERIAL_NBR, REG_ID
Table 5 - STAGE#EMEA_NSAP.NSC_PROD_REG_CYC_CIMG has Key Fields MATERIAL_NBR, REG_ID, CYC_ID and ORGVERSIONID
Columns needed from Table 3 -- B.DIVISION, B.DIVISIONNAME, B.SUBLABEL, B.SUBLABELNAME and B.DEVELOPMENTREGION.
Columns needed from Table 4 --- C.GLOBALSOURCEINDICATOR
Columns needed from Table 5--- D.CARRYOVERFLAG
SELECT statement:
SELECT /*+ parallel (a,5) parallel (NET,5) */
a.key_material,
a.mkt_typ_id,
a.region_id,
CASE
WHEN a.region_id = '3' THEN 'USA'
WHEN a.region_id = '4' THEN 'EMEA'
WHEN a.region_id = '7' THEN 'CANADA'
END AS region_desc,
a.mkt_reg_cd,
CASE
WHEN a.mkt_reg_cd = '01' THEN 'USA'
WHEN a.mkt_reg_cd = '02' THEN 'EMEA'
WHEN a.mkt_reg_cd = '05' THEN 'AMER'
END AS mkt_reg_desc,
a.cat_bus_cd1,
a.cat_bus_desc1,
a.cat_bus_cd2,
a.cat_bus_desc2,
a.cat_bus_cd3,
a.cat_bus_desc3,
a.cat_bus_cd4,
a.cat_bus_desc4,
a.mkstr_cd,
a.mkt_clsfn_desc,
a.mkt_clsfn_cd1,
a.mkt_clsfn1_desc,
a.mkt_clsfn_cd2,
a.mkt_clsfn2_desc,
a.mkt_clsfn_cd3,
a.mkt_clsfn3_desc,
a.exp_sty_ind,
a.silh_cd,
a.silh_desc,
a.whlsl_prc,
0,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
a.gender_age_class_id,
a.gender_age_desc,
a.sports_activity_class_id,
a.sports_act_cls_desc,
a.gblcatsummcode,
a.gblcatsummdesc,
a.gblcatcorefocuscode,
a.gblcatcorefocusdesc,
a.segment,
a.segmentname,
a.l4l_fl,
NET.DIVISION,
NET.DIVISIONNAME,
NET.SUBLABEL,
NET.SUBLABELNAME,
NET.DEVELOPMENTREGION,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NET.globalsourceindicator,
NET.CARRYOVERFLAG,
a.zz_chng_tmst,
a.zz_update_tmst,
a.zz_insert_tmst
FROM RPT_APRL_PRODUCT A,
(SELECT
APRL.DIVISION||APRL.PLAN_CTRY||APRL.MKT_TYP_ID||APRL.MATERIAL ; AS KEY_MATERIAL,
B.DIVISION,
B.DIVISIONNAME,
B.SUBLABEL,
B.SUBLABELNAME,
B.DEVELOPMENTREGION,
C.GLOBALSOURCEINDICATOR,
D.CARRYOVERFLAG
from RPT_APRL_PRODUCTAPRL,
NSC_PROD_CIMG B,
NSC_PROD_REG_CIMG C,
NSC_PROD_REG_CYC_CIMG D
where APRL.MATERIAL = B.MATERIAL_NBR AND
APRL.MATERIAL = C.MATERIAL_NBR AND
APRL.MATERIAL = D.MATERIAL_NBR AND
C.REG_ID = D.REG_ID) NET
WHERE A.KEY_MATERIAL = NET.KEY_MATERIAL(+)
Thanks for help in advance.

I have 4 tables and these are some sample data for
RPT_APRL_PRODUCT - Key Field = KEY_MATERIAL (this is a combination of plan_ctry,division,mkt_typ_id and material)
Sample data
KEY_MATERIAL          PLAN_CTRY   DIVISION MKT_TYP_ID              MATERIAL
10PART1136353-010      PART          10              1                      136353-010
10AMER1136353-010      AMER          10              1                      136353-010
10USA1136353-010      USA          10              1                      136353-010
10CANA1136353-010      CANA          10              1                      136353-010
10PART1137508-050      PART          10              1                      137508-050
10AMER1137508-050      AMER          10              1                      137508-050
10CANA1137508-050      CANA          10              1                      137508-050
10USA1137508-050      USA          10              1                      137508-050
10PART1137617-050      PART          10              1                      137617-050
10AMER1137617-050      AMER          10              1                       137617-050nsc_prod_reg_cimg - keys (material_nbr and reg_id)
MATERIAL                REG_ID          GLOBALSOURCEINDICATOR
136353-010      3                                     G
136353-010      6                                     G
136353-010      7
137508-050      3
137508-050      6                                     G
137508-050      7
137508-050      46                                    G
137617-050      3
137617-050      6
137617-050      46                                    nsc_prod_reg_cyc_cimg - key is material_nbr, cyc_id, reg_id and orgversion_id
MATERIAL_NBR       CYC_ID                    orgversion_id                                reg_ID                CARRYOVERFLAG
136353-010      101                             1                                          3                             Y
136353-010      101                              1                                          6                             Y
136353-010      101                               1                                          7                             N
137508-050      202                               1                                          3                             Y
137508-050      202                               1                                          6                             N
137508-050      202                               1                                          7
137617-050      205                               1                                          3
137617-050      205                               1                                          6
185204-402      181                              1                                          8
185204-402      182                               1                                          8                                     nsc_prod_cimg - key is material_nbr
MATERIAL_NBR     SUBLABEL     SUBLABELNAME
136353-010
137508-050                GD           Good
137617-050
185204-402
185204-402
185204-402                BE            Better
185204-402
185204-402
185204-402               CO            Core
185204-402               BS             BestWhat I intend to do, is to create one view by joining these four tables. The columns key_material, plan_ctry, division and MKT_TYP_ID come from RPT_APRL_PRODUCT. I need to join these tables in such a way that I bring in the other 1 or 2 columns each from the 3 tables as described above. The result should have a unique key_material and have the other column data in the view as well.
Result should be all the columns described above, something like this below...
KEY_MATERIAL          PLAN_CTRY   DIVISION MKT_TYP_ID              MATERIAL      SUBLABELNAME CARRYover_FL
10PART1136353-010      PART          10              1                      136353-010
10AMER1136353-010      AMER          10              1                      136353-010

HELP - Query Join Problem

I am trying to write a query to return data from 4 different tables and it is doubling my summed values. I can get the separate queries to work, but not combined and I need them combined so that I can get a balance due and limit the records to only those that had a total billed (fees) less than $200.
Query #1 Gets the total of the fees due for each appeal type and invoice:
Note: There is always at least one fee attached to an invoice.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM( ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) "TOTAL BILLED AMOUNT"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_FEES_DUE FEE,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = FEE.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     1200
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     1100
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826     1000
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951     2060
Query #2 Gets the total amount paid for each appeal type and invoice:
Note: An invoice may or may not have a payment, thus the outer join.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT) "AMOUNT PAID"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT,
WRD_PAYMENTS PMT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = PMT.INVC_ID_SEQ(+)
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     200
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     0
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951
Combined Query - Gets all of the above as well as the balance due. Note the doubled values for some records.
SELECT APT.APTY_DESCR "APPEAL TYPE",
INV.INVC_ID_SEQ INVOICE,
SUM( ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) "TOTAL BILLED AMOUNT",
     SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT) "AMOUNT PAID",
     (SUM(ALL FEE.AMT_DUE) -
     NVL2(SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT), SUM(ALL PMT.PAID_AMT), 0)) "BALANCE DUE"
FROM WRD_APPEALS AP,
WRD_INVOICES INV,
WRD_FEES_DUE FEE,
WRD_APPEAL_TYPES APT,
     WRD_PAYMENTS PMT
WHERE AP.APST_CD = 'PEND'
AND AP.INVC_ID_SEQ = INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
     AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = PMT.INVC_ID_SEQ(+)
     AND INV.INVC_ID_SEQ = FEE.INVC_ID_SEQ
     AND AP.APTY_CD = APT.APTY_CD
GROUP BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ
ORDER BY APT.APTY_DESCR, INV.INVC_ID_SEQ,
4     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4147     1200     400     800
5     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4203     2200     0     2200
6     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4216     72600     435600     -363000
7     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4826     1000          1000
8     BILLING CATEGORY INCORRECT     4951     2060          2060
HELP PLEASE!
Thank you.

When you have multiple child rows, the parent row gets returned once for each child row found. Therefore, if you have summed the invoice, it gets summed again for each payment. Perhaps this little example will help you understand the problem.
Note that I used a sub query here to obtain the desired results. Analytic functions can do the same I believe, but I am still learning them :-)
D> DROP TABLE DMILL.invoice;
Table dropped.
D>
D> DROP TABLE DMILL.payments;
Table dropped.
D>
D> CREATE TABLE invoice AS
     SELECT 1 id, 10 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 id, 10 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 id, 10 FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 3 id, 10 FROM DUAL;
Table created.
D>
D> CREATE TABLE payments AS
     SELECT 1 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 1 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL UNION ALL
     SELECT 2 inv_id, 5 amount FROM DUAL;
Table created.
D>
D> select * from invoice;
        ID     AMOUNT
         1         10
         2         10
         2         10
         3         10
D>
D> select * from payments;
    INV_ID     AMOUNT
         1          5
         1          5
         2          5
         2          5
         2          5
D>
D> select id
              ,sum (amount)
      from invoice
     group by id;
        ID SUM(AMOUNT)
         1          10
         2          20
         3          10
D>
D> select inv_id
              ,sum(amount)
      from payments
     group by inv_id;
    INV_ID SUM(AMOUNT)
         1          10
         2          15
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,inv.amount
              ,pay.amount
      from invoice inv
             ,payments pay
     where pay.inv_id = inv.id;
        ID     AMOUNT     AMOUNT
         1         10          5
         1         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
         2         10          5
8 rows selected.
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,sum(inv.amount)
              ,sum(pay.amount)
      from invoice inv
             ,payments pay
     where pay.inv_id = inv.id
     group by inv.id;
        ID SUM(INV.AMOUNT) SUM(PAY.AMOUNT)
         1              20              10
         2              60              30
D>
D> select inv.id
              ,sum(inv.amount)
              ,(SELECT sum(pay.amount)
                FROM   payments pay
                WHERE pay.inv_id = inv.id)
      from invoice inv
     group by inv.id;
        ID SUM(INV.AMOUNT) (SELECTSUM(PAY.AMOUNT)FROMPAYMENTSPAYWHEREPAY.INV_ID=INV.ID)
         1              10                                                           10
         2              20                                                           15
         3              10Let me know if you need further explanation.

Need help in joins in OBIEE 10G

Hi All,
I have 2 tables like following.
Table 1: Team
Id| Team Name| Resource id
1 | xxx | 1
2 | yyy | 1
3 | zzz | 1
4 | xxx | 2
Table 2: Resource Rate
RSRC ID| Resource Name| Rate | Month | year
1 | John | 10 | Jan | 2012
2 | Max | 5 | Jan | 2012
I have joined these 2 tables with Resource ID. I have a prompt with Team Name and Resource Name and I have a OBIEE chart report (Month,Year Vs Rate), in which if do not select team name in prompt or select only one team name then the results are fine but when i select 2 team names in the prompt for example 'xxx','yyy' the results gets doubled. If I select 3 team names, the result will be rate*3. But I want the result to be same value even after I select more than one team name.
How to archive this??? Kindly help
Edited by: GJ on Sep 10, 2012 10:39 PM
Edited by: GJ on Sep 10, 2012 11:53 PM

Hi Veeravalli,
No I cannot have team name after resource name, because the purpose is to see based on team and then on resource. Moreover their is nothing wrong with queries generated, it is working as it is expected, Since the resource is mapped to 2 teams, I am getting duplicate values.
I am just trying to find if there is a way to return always unique values.

Help in Joining query

Hi, How I can get desired result. I am joining two tables but if date timeline does't exist in #two table then should show hyphen (-). Please help on this query. Thanks.
create table #one (code_p char(4), code_h char(2), code_date datetime)
insert into #one values ('DEHG','2','2010-01-01')
insert into #one values ('DEHG','2','2011-01-01')
insert into #one values ('DEHC','2','2009-01-01')
insert into #one values ('DEHG','2','2012-01-01')
create table #two (code_p char(4), code_h char(2), code_date datetime)
insert into #two values ('DEHG','2','2010-01-01')
insert into #two values ('DEHC','2','2009-01-01')
select p.code_p code_p_one, p.code_h code_h_one, p.code_date code_date_one,
p.code_p code_p_two, p.code_h code_h_two, p.code_date code_date_two from #one p join #two a on p.code_p = a.code_p
--Result from the above query
code_p_one code_h_one code_date_one code_p_two code_h_two code_date_two
DEHG     2    2010-01-01     DEHG     2     2010-01-01
DEHG     2    2011-01-01     DEHG     2     2010-01-01
DEHC     2    2009-01-01     DEHG     2     2009-01-01
DEHC     2    2012-01-01     DEHG     2     2009-01-01
--Desired result
code_p_one code_h_one code_date_one code_p_two code_h_two code_date_two
DEHG     2    2010-01-01     DEHG     2     2010-01-01
DEHG     2    2011-01-01     DEHG     2     -
DEHC     2    2009-01-01     DEHG     2     2009-01-01
DEHC     2    2012-01-01     DEHG     2     -

Try this:
select p.code_p code_p_one, p.code_h code_h_one, p.code_date code_date_one,
p.code_p code_p_two, p.code_h code_h_two, ISNULL(CONVERT(varchar(50),a.code_date,121),'-') code_date_two
from #one p
left join #two a on p.code_p = a.code_p and p.code_date=a.code_date
If this post answers your query, please click "Mark As Answer" or "Vote as Helpful".

I need a help on Join please or anybody help to rewrite the query

select
x.QUEST_DESC,y.QUES_RESPONSE, y.user_id from
(select c.QUES_CODE, c.QUEST_DESC, null user_id from CLINICAL_HISTORY_QUESTIONS c where c.CLINICAL_TYPE_CODE=2) x,
(select a.QUEST_CODE, a.QUEST_RESPONSE, a.user_id from PATIENT_CLINICAL_HISTORIES a where a.CLINICAL_TYPE_CODE=2 and a.user_ID=88) y
where x.QUEST_CODE =y.QUEST_CODE(+)
Is there any way I can display same user_ID 88 on the null USER_ID (Joined one)
my result is
QUEST_DESC     QUEST_RESPONSE     USER_ID
Fibrostenotic               U     88
Inflammatory               U     88
Int Penetrating/Perforating          U     88
Perianal Perforating Disease          U     88
Uc Like                    U     88
Iv Therapy
Fistula
Bleeding
Osteopenia
Sibo
Urgency
Extraintestinal Sx
Steroid Dependent
Immunosuppressive Tx
Fever/Chills
Obstructive Sx
Stool Consistency
Adb Pain
Other
Growth
Osteoporosis
Stool Frequency
Flare Of Disease
Edited by: Paul Vellackel on Jul 2, 2010 3:20 PM
Edited by: Paul Vellackel on Jul 2, 2010 3:55 PM

sigh
What we were asking you is to post data we can work with rightaway, so CREATE TABLE statement, and INSERT INTO statement. So: not output, but statements...
Since I'm in a good mood (we're in the semi finals ;) ), here's an example of how you should post your data:
create table a1 as
select 1 quest_code, 'Fibrostenotic' quest_desc from dual union
select 2, 'Inflammatory' from dual union
select 3, 'Int Penetrating/Perforating' from dual union
select 4, 'Perianal Perforating Disease' from dual union
select 5, 'Uc Like' from dual union
select 6, 'Flare Of Disease' from dual union
select 7, 'Immunosuppressive Tx' from dual union
select 8, 'Iv Therapy' from dual union
select 9, 'Stool Consistency' from dual union
select 10, 'Urgency' from dual union
select 11, 'Stool Frequency' from dual union
select 12, 'Bleeding' from dual union
select 13, 'Adb Pain' from dual union
select 14, 'Fever/Chills' from dual union
select 15, 'Fistula' from dual union
select 16, 'Obstructive Sx' from dual union
select 17, 'Extraintestinal Sx' from dual union
select 18, 'Steroid Dependent' from dual union
select 19, 'Sibo' from dual union
select 20, 'Osteoporosis' from dual union
select 21, 'Osteopenia' from dual union
select 22, 'Growth' from dual union
select 23, 'Other' from dual;
create table a2 as
select 1 quest_code, 'U' quest_response, 88 user_id from dual union
select 2, 'U', 88 from dual union
select 3, 'U', 88 from dual union
select 4, 'U', 88 from dual union
select 5, 'U', 88 from dual;
create table a3 as
select 'testuserb' user_name, 88 user_id from dual;Posted like that, we can copy+paste and try to help you rightaway instead of waisting time formatting, putting quotes right etc. etc.
Also use the {noformat}{noformat} tag when you post an example.
That way it will stay formatted and indented.
So, when you type: {noformat}select *
from dual;{noformat}
it will appear as: select *
from dual;when you post it.
Finally, perhaps you could try something like this:SQL> select a1.quest_desc
2 , a2.quest_response
3 , case
4 when (select a3.user_id
5 from a3
6 where a3.user_id = a2.user_id) is not null
7 then (select a3.user_id
8 from a3
9 where a3.user_id = a2.user_id)
10 else (select a3.user_id
11 from a3
12 where a3.user_name = 'testuserb')
13 end user_id
14 from a1
15 , a2
16 where a1.quest_code = a2.quest_code(+);
QUEST_DESC Q USER_ID
Fibrostenotic U 88
Inflammatory U 88
Int Penetrating/Perforating U 88
Perianal Perforating Disease U 88
Uc Like U 88
Iv Therapy 88
Fistula 88
Bleeding 88
Osteopenia 88
Sibo 88
Urgency 88
Extraintestinal Sx 88
Steroid Dependent 88
Immunosuppressive Tx 88
Fever/Chills 88
Obstructive Sx 88
Stool Consistency 88
Adb Pain 88
Other 88
Growth 88
Osteoporosis 88
Stool Frequency 88
Flare Of Disease 88
23 rows selected.

View with outer join results wrong number of rows

Hi,
When i run a query on a view it returns 2 rows(2 distinct rows), when i run the same query with the select statement which the view is created , it returns only 1 row. According to data the 1 row result is correct, how come twi results. A coding sample as follows. Any help is most appreciated.
I have a view created based on a outer join of two views in the format;
create or replace view view1 as
select ord.order_no order_no,
ord.del_type del_type,
det.qty qty
from detail_view det, order_view ord
where det.site(+) = ord.site
and det.part(+) = ord.part
and nvl(ord.del_type,'_NULL_') <> 'F'
with read only;
detail_view & order_view themselves have several group by/sum and union Alls.
When i run the query on this view
[Select * from View1 where order_no = 'A30' And del_type = 'B']
it returns 2 distinct rows. But when i run the select statement which created the View1 with the query it returns only one row!!
What did i do wrong?
Thanks
Sanjeewa

I cannot reproduce this :
SCOTT@LSC01> create table detail_view(qty number,site number,part number);
Table created.
SCOTT@LSC01> create table order_view(order_no varchar2(10), del_type varchar2(1), site number,part number);
Table created.
SCOTT@LSC01>
SCOTT@LSC01> create or replace view view1 as
2 select ord.order_no order_no,
3 ord.del_type del_type,
4 det.qty qty
5 from detail_view det, order_view ord
6 where det.site(+) = ord.site
7 and det.part(+) = ord.part
8 and nvl(ord.del_type,'_NULL_') <> 'F'
9 with read only;
View created.
SCOTT@LSC01>
SCOTT@LSC01> insert into order_view values ('A30','B',1,2);
1 row created.
SCOTT@LSC01> insert into order_view values ('A30','B',1,2);
1 row created.
SCOTT@LSC01>
SCOTT@LSC01> Select * from View1 where order_no = 'A30' And del_type = 'B';
ORDER_NO   D        QTY
A30        B
A30        B
SCOTT@LSC01>
SCOTT@LSC01> select ord.order_no order_no,
2 ord.del_type del_type,
3 det.qty qty
4 from detail_view det, order_view ord
5 where det.site(+) = ord.site
6 and det.part(+) = ord.part
7 and nvl(ord.del_type,'_NULL_') <> 'F' ;
ORDER_NO   D        QTY
A30        B
A30        Bwhat is your version?

Help with joins

Hi,
I am not sure if I am doing something wrong here, but would appreciate if someone point out my mistake.
I have two table item and item_status
item_status do not contain all the items but only the ones which have specific status
Question(1):
select count(*) from item
and
select count(*) from item left join item_status on item.itemid = item_status.item_id
Result of these two queries dont match. Can you'll plz help me understand it.
Question(2):
I want count of items from table item by location (location is another field in table item) but I want to exclude items which have status lost in the item_status table.
This is the query I used:
select location, count(*) from item left join item_status on item.itemid = item_status.item_id where item_status.status = 'lost'
is this the correct way, coz when I tried the figures where way to low,
Thanks,
Raja

Hi, Raja,
Raja Gopalan wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if I am doing something wrong here, but would appreciate if someone point out my mistake.
I have two table item and item_status
item_status do not contain all the items but only the ones which have specific status
Question(1):
select count(*) from item
and
select count(*) from item left join item_status on item.itemid = item_status.item_id
Result of these two queries dont match. Can you'll plz help me understand it.If there can be many rows in item_status that all match the same row in item, then the 2nd query will have a higher COUNT than the first.
If you'd post your tables, I could show you in detail.
Since you didn't I'll use tables from the scott schema.
SELECT d.deptno
FROM     scott.dept     d;produces 4 rows:
.   DEPTNO
        10
        20
        30
        40Only 3 of these rows have a match in the mep table, but the ones that match have many matches.
SELECT     d.deptno
,     e.ename
FROM          scott.dept     d
LEFT OUTER JOIN     scott.emp     e     ON     d.deptno     = e.deptno;produces 15 rows
.   DEPTNO ENAME
        20 SMITH
        30 ALLEN
        30 WARD
        20 JONES
        30 MARTIN
        30 BLAKE
        10 CLARK
        20 SCOTT
        10 KING
        30 TURNER
        20 ADAMS
        30 JAMES
        20 FORD
        10 MILLER
        401 row for each row in emp that has a match in dept (that is all 14 rows in emp) plus 1 row for every row in dept that does not have a match in emp (1 row).
Question(2):
I want count of items from table item by location (location is another field in table item) but I want to exclude items which have status lost in the item_status table.
This is the query I used:
select location, count(*) from item left join item_status on item.itemid = item_status.item_id where item_status.status = 'lost'
is this the correct way, coz when I tried the figures where way to low,If you want a count by location, then you should say "GROUP BY location".
You probably need a sub-query to check for 'lost'. Without seeing your tables and data, I can't be sure.
Maybe something like
SELECT location
,     COUNT (*)
FROM     item
WHERE     itemid     NOT IN     (     -- Begin subquery to find bad item_ids
                   SELECT item_id
               FROM     item_status
               WHERE     status     = 'lost'
                   )     -- End subquery to find bad item_ids
GROUP BY location
;

Help with joining one table to several

I have the following table
MSELECT
Res_ID
Res_type
34
501
56
501
72
501
81
502
90
502
100
502
47
503
48
503
The RES_ID will link to different tables such as tablea, tableb or tablec based on the RES_Type value .g. RES_Type ID 501 will link to tableA and 502 will link to TableB and 503 will link to TableC.
I have created the following query:
Select * from MSSELECT MSEL
Inner join tablea ta on
Ta.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
Inner join tableb tb on
Tb.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
If I run the following query then results are returned.
Select * from MSSELECT MSEL
Inner join tablea ta on
Ta.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
However if I run the following query it is returning no results:
Select * from MSSELECT MSEL
Inner join tablea ta on
Ta.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
Inner join tableb tb on
Tb.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501

Try:
Select * from MSSELECT MSEL
LEFT OUTER join tablea ta on
Ta.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
LEFT OUTER join tableb tb on
Tb.id = MSEL.ID and
Res_type = 501
Best Wishes, Arbi; Please vote if you find this posting was helpful or Mark it as answered.

Help in joining two tables

Hi ,
I need your help in the below scenario:
I have two tables.
One of my table 'table1' contains the below data:
Code:
Name,Value
12A,1
12B,1
12C,1
Table2 contains the below data:
Code:
value,result
1,12
1,24
1,56
1,423
1,32
1,3
I need to join based on value field.
My expected result is:
Code:
NAME,VALUE,RESULT
12A,1,12
12B,1,24
12C,1,56
12D,1,423
12E,1,32
12F,1,3
Depends on the number of records in the second table,we need to append A to Z at the end of the name field. The number of records will not exceed more than 26. How we can achieve this?
Thanks
Pandeeswaran

OK, now you give another useful information - that there always will be combinations of sums in table2 to match the values in table1. (It is difficult to help when you tell the specs one at a time :-) )
But it is not easy, because the code really will have to try and consider all possible combinations and then "choosing the right one" - this is easy for us humans, but not easy to encode in programming logic.
I have made an attempt:
SQL> set linesize 120
SQL> with table1 as (
2     select 'A1' name, 123 id, 150 value from dual union all
3     select 'A2' name, 123 id, 200 value from dual union all
4     select 'A3' name, 123 id, 300 value from dual
5 ), table2 as (
6     select 123 id, 100 value from dual union all
7     select 123 id, 100 value from dual union all
8     select 123 id, 50 value from dual union all
9     select 123 id, 100 value from dual union all
10     select 123 id, 100 value from dual union all
11     select 123 id, 100 value from dual union all
12     select 123 id, 100 value from dual
13 )
14 --
15 -- End of test data
16 --
17 select
18 t1.id, t1.name, t1.value, t2.value,
19 t1.rn, t1.minval, t1.maxval,
20 t2.rn, t2.sumval
21 from (
22     select
23     tab1.*,
24     nvl(sum(tab1.value) over (
25        partition by tab1.id
26        order by tab1.rn
27        rows between unbounded preceding and 1 preceding
28     ),0) minval,
29     sum(tab1.value) over (
30        partition by tab1.id
31        order by tab1.rn
32        rows between unbounded preceding and current row
33     ) maxval
34     from (
35        select
36        table1.*,
37        row_number() over (
38           partition by table1.id
39           order by table1.value desc
40        ) rn
41        from table1
42     ) tab1
43 ) t1
44 join (
45     select
46     tab2.*,
47     sum(tab2.value) over (
48        partition by tab2.id
49        order by tab2.rn
50     ) sumval
51     from (
52        select
53        table2.*,
54        row_number() over (
55           partition by table2.id
56           order by table2.value desc
57        ) rn
58        from table2
59     ) tab2
60 ) t2
61 on (t2.id = t1.id)
62 where t2.sumval > t1.minval
63 and t2.sumval <= t1.maxval
64 order by
65 t1.id,
66 t1.rn,
67 t2.rn
68 ;
        ID NA      VALUE      VALUE         RN     MINVAL     MAXVAL         RN     SUMVAL
       123 A3        300        100          1          0        300          1        100
       123 A3        300        100          1          0        300          2        200
       123 A3        300        100          1          0        300          3        300
       123 A2        200        100          2        300        500          4        400
       123 A2        200        100          2        300        500          5        500
       123 A1        150        100          3        500        650          6        600
       123 A1        150         50          3        500        650          7        650
7 rows selected.It does seem to work for your data sample, but it is much too simple a rule to work in general. My "rule" simply is to order the data by value descending and summing up until "enough" values have been added.
Consider this data sample instead:
SQL> with table1 as (
2     select 'A1' name, 1 id, 100 value from dual union all
3     select 'A2' name, 1 id, 200 value from dual union all
4     select 'A3' name, 1 id, 300 value from dual union all
5     select 'B1' name, 2 id, 100 value from dual union all
6     select 'B2' name, 2 id, 200 value from dual
7 ), table2 as (
8     select 1 id, 25 value from dual union all
9     select 1 id, 75 value from dual union all
10     select 1 id, 50 value from dual union all
11     select 1 id, 50 value from dual union all
12     select 1 id, 175 value from dual union all
13     select 1 id, 225 value from dual union all
14     select 2 id, 25 value from dual union all
15     select 2 id, 50 value from dual union all
16     select 2 id, 75 value from dual union all
17     select 2 id, 100 value from dual union all
18     select 2 id, 50 value from dual
19 )
20 --
21 -- End of test data
22 --
23 select
24 t1.id, t1.name, t1.value, t2.value,
25 t1.rn, t1.minval, t1.maxval,
26 t2.rn, t2.sumval
27 from (
28     select
29     tab1.*,
30     nvl(sum(tab1.value) over (
31        partition by tab1.id
32        order by tab1.rn
33        rows between unbounded preceding and 1 preceding
34     ),0) minval,
35     sum(tab1.value) over (
36        partition by tab1.id
37        order by tab1.rn
38        rows between unbounded preceding and current row
39     ) maxval
40     from (
41        select
42        table1.*,
43        row_number() over (
44           partition by table1.id
45           order by table1.value desc
46        ) rn
47        from table1
48     ) tab1
49 ) t1
50 join (
51     select
52     tab2.*,
53     sum(tab2.value) over (
54        partition by tab2.id
55        order by tab2.rn
56     ) sumval
57     from (
58        select
59        table2.*,
60        row_number() over (
61           partition by table2.id
62           order by table2.value desc
63        ) rn
64        from table2
65     ) tab2
66 ) t2
67 on (t2.id = t1.id)
68 where t2.sumval > t1.minval
69 and t2.sumval <= t1.maxval
70 order by
71 t1.id,
72 t1.rn,
73 t2.rn
74 ;
        ID NA      VALUE      VALUE         RN     MINVAL     MAXVAL         RN     SUMVAL
         1 A3        300        225          1          0        300          1        225
         1 A2        200        175          2        300        500          2        400
         1 A2        200         75          2        300        500          3        475
         1 A1        100         50          3        500        600          4        525
         1 A1        100         50          3        500        600          5        575
         1 A1        100         25          3        500        600          6        600
         2 B2        200        100          1          0        200          1        100
         2 B2        200         75          1          0        200          2        175
         2 B1        100         50          2        200        300          3        225
         2 B1        100         50          2        200        300          4        275
         2 B1        100         25          2        200        300          5        300
11 rows selected.In this dataset the simple ordering by value will not work - It should have been A3: (225,75), A2: (175,25) and A1: (50,50).
I cannot really think of a reasonably simple way to do it in SQL alone. Maybe using the MODEL clause would be possible, but not trivial. It is possible it would be easier to solve this in PL/SQL by iterating through a couple of arrays and intelligently trying the different combinations, rather than brute-force creating all combinations in a huge piece of SQL.
I am sorry, Pandeesh, but I can not think of a solution easily.
I might be able to do something if I fiddled with the problem for a couple of days, but that would be beyond the scope of this forum. That would be a consulting job rather than a bit of forum help :-)

Need help in join

hi,
Following are my columns data in same table,
Value1 Value2
1 1
2 2
3 4
1 3
My output sould be as like follows
value
1
2
3
4
so please help me on this logc by proving sample query

Hey or in other way i will explain my requirment,
i have two reslutset,
result set A and result set b. i want to join both the result set and bring the output as follows.
resultA
1
2
3
1
resultB
1
2
3
4
ned to join these two results and bring the out put as follows
result:
1
2
3
4
i given my requirement in last post bit wrongly, the above requirement is correct. can u pls help me now

Need help on join query

Hi All,
Please help me on the below join condition,
>SELECT * FROM ESTIMATE_LINE WHERE JOB_ID = '214582' AND ESTIMATE_ID = 2;
Output : Returns 1 row,
>SELECT * FROM ESTIMATE_ACCOUNTING_LINE WHERE JOB_ID = '214582' AND ESTIMATE_ID = 2;
Output : Returns 3 rows,
I would like to add these two outputs as on, Finally i've to get 4 rows in the output,
For that am writing the query like this,
SELECT EL.*,EAL.*
FROM ESTIMATE_LINE EL,
ESTIMATE_ACCOUNTING_LINE EAL
WHERE EL.JOB_ID = EAL.JOB_ID (+)
AND EL.ESTIMATE_ID = EAL.ESTIMATE_ID (+)
AND EAL.JOB_ID = '214582'
AND EL.ESTIMATE_ID = 2,
It is not giving the exact output, the common fields are there in the join condition,
Can some one please re write the query for expected output..
I am trying it but not getting the exact output,Unable to find out where the mistake is ...
Thanks,
gra

Hi,
First, let me make sure I undersatnd the problem.
You have a query that lookas for information about a given job_id and estimate_id the estimate_line table. This query produces X rows.
You have another query that lookas for information about the same job_id and estimate_id the estimate_accounting__line table. This query produces Y rows.
You want to get the same results in one query that produces X+Y rows.
That sounds like a job for UNION, not a join.
If the two queries produces the same number of columns, and the data types of the columns are similiar, then you can just write the two queries together. Instead of a semicolon at the end of the first query, you'll say UNION (or UNION ALL):
SELECT * FROM ESTIMATE_LINE WHERE JOB_ID = '214582' AND ESTIMATE_ID = 2
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM ESTIMATE_ACCOUNTING_LINE WHERE JOB_ID = '214582' AND ESTIMATE_ID = 2;If the columns are not the same, you'll need to call some conversion functions, or add literal columns (such as NULL) to the queries.
If you need help, post a little sampe data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results you want from that data.

Help with join query

Hi,
I was wondering if someone could help me out with a join question
I have threetables, phase, project and projectPhase. Primary keys in bold, foreign in italiz, foreign and primary in bold.italic:
project
projectCode
phase
phaseCode
projectPhase
projectCode
phaseCode
I was wondering is there a way to query to see, for a given project code, what phases that project has not got information for? I think I need an outer join for this but I'm not sure
Thanks!

i agree with you Jens thanks for spotting that i might have overlooked.
try using Jens solution and it produce the result that you want. all you had to do is if the values are in different upper and lower case wrap it with either UPPER or LOWER function.
SQL> select * from project;
PROJECTCOD
NNUU
MKKU
SQL> select * from phase;
PHASECODE
Req
Des
Plan
SQL> select * from projectphase;
PROJECTCOD PHASECODE
NNUU       REQ
NNUU       Des
SQL> select Upper(phaseCode) phaseCode
2    from phase
3   minus
4 select Upper(phaseCode) phaseCode
5    from projectPhase
6   where projectcode= 'NNUU';
PHASECODE
PLAN
SQL>

Help! Add Result into JTree or JList.

Hi,
I retrived some values from one of the table from database using ResultSet. And I want to add
the result into the JList or JTree. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Sam.
Here is the code.
void searchButton_actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
try{
String query = "SELECT * FROM PINFO WHERE POLICYNUMBER = '" +
searchTextfield.getText().toUpperCase() + "'";
ResultSet rs = Application1.stmt.executeQuery(query);
while(rs.next()){
pid = (rs.getInt("PID"));
System.out.println(pid);
catch(SQLException ex){
System.err.println("SQLException: " + ex.getMessage());
try{
String query = "SELECT * FROM (UNMATCH U LEFT JOIN DOCUMENTTYPE D ON U.DOCUMENTTYPE=D.DOCNUMBER) WHERE PID = '" + pid + "'";
ResultSet rs1 = Application1.stmt.executeQuery(query);
while (rs1.next()){
String documentcode = (rs1.getString("DOCUMENTCODE"));
//************** I want to add these documentcode into the Jlist or jTree.
System.out.println(documentcode);
catch(SQLException s){
System.err.println("SQLException: " + s.getMessage());
}

public class blah
Vector v;
JList j;
public blah()
v = new Vector();
j = new JList(v);
JPanel jP = new JPanel();
jP.add(j);
public getResults()
v.removeAllElements();
j.setListData(v);
String query......
Resultset rs = .....
while(rs.next())
String s = rs.getString("");
v.add(s);
j.setListData(v);

Urgent Help Needed - Joining On Columns with Concatenated Values

I have a challenging issue where I'm trying to join two tables together with a USER_ID column. The caveat is that in one of the tables, the USER_ID is potentially concatenated.
For example, TABLE1 has 2 columns:
1) USER ID
2) USER NAME
TABLE2 has 3 columns:
1) USER ID
2) USER COUNTRY
3) USER DATE HIRED
The resulting SQL query is:
select * from TABLE1, TABLE2
where TABLE1.USER_ID = TABLE2.USER_ID
The problem is that TABLE1.USER_ID is only limited to 1 ID per record. However, TABLE2 potentially has concatenated USER ID's.
In other words, while TABLE1 has a USER_ID = 'ABC123', that same ID may appear in TABLE2 concatenated as USER_ID = 'ABC123;ABC124'
Obviously, with a natural join, this individual will be dropped from the SQL result-set.
Is there a "join function" that I can use to say - "whenever I'm joining these 2 tables, as long as the TABLE1.USER_ID appears *ANYWHERE* in the TABLE2.USER_ID concatenated string (regardless of position), then please include this record in the join??
As of right now, I have total 80 rows. 55 of them successfully are pulled because they have a one-to-one USER_ID correspondence. The other 25 are dropped out because they have multiple concatenated ID's in TABLE2 and only one ID in TABLE1.
Any advice/help will be greatly appreciated!

Hi
Etbin wrote:
Maybe
select *
from TABLE1,TABLE2
where instr(TABLE2.USER_ID,TABLE1.USER_ID) > 0Regards
Etbin
Edited by: Etbin on 20.4.2012 23:27
Forgot to mention; <strike>Urgent</strike>How could you forget the "I found love in Slovenia" problem?
If the keys can be different lengths, then the solution above will match different keys if the one in table1 happens to be a substring of the one in table2. For example, if table1.userid='ABC'1, and table2.userid='ABC123;ABC124', then it will be considered a match.
To avoid that:SELECT *
FROM      table1
,     table2
WHERE      INSTR ( ';' || table2.user_id || ';'
           , ';' || table1.user_id || ';'
           ) > 0And Martijn is right (as usual). Storing several different values in a single column, like you're doing with table2.user_id, will cause lots of problems. Store each one in a separate row of a new table.

Help in joining results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for