Help with vendor enhacement

hai to all experts,
i have a requirement when we create vendor (xk01) if the city is hyderabad then in the lfa1 table the vendor number should be saved as
example 'hyd96554' .
i have already writen the code in include ZXF05U01 in function module EXIT_SAPMF02K_001.
*code:*
if i_lfa1-ORT01 = 'hyderabad'.
shift i_lfa1-lifnr left deleting leading '0'.
concatenate 'hyd' i_lfa1-lifnr into i_lfa1-lifnr .
endif.
the code is excuting well and in i_lfa1-lifnr the desired value (hyd7684)
is getting saved.
but in lfa1 table it is getting saved as 000007684.
what should i do?

Hi
first check whether the vendor Number range is Internal or External assignment?
if it is internal assignment then you can't make it to happen, it will not accept your number, it will take the number as per the number range assigned for it.
if it is external assignment , then you can enter the number like HYD2345 and create a vendor.
And it seems that changing the Vendor number (which is a primary key) based on the City is not a correct assignment, let the some other field related to vendor can be changed based on the city.
Regards
Anji

Similar Messages

Help with vendor email Address table

Can someone help me with this issue.
I am trying to pull out the vendor email address for all the vendors. Vendor email address are the one's which are entered in the First page on XK01. I checked on the table name and it brings up only a structure.
Please help

You can try something like this....
Example...
*Selecting the ADRNE from LFA1...
SELECT SINGLE ADRNR FROM LFA1 INTO I_ADRNR
          WHERE LIFNR = ITAB-LIFNR.
*Passing ADRNR to ADR6 to get Email...
    SELECT SMTP_ADDR INTO TABLE I_Z1EMAIL
        FROM ADR6 WHERE ADDRNUMBER = I_ADRNR.

Help with replicating/updating vendor master data

Hi,
Currently, we run the bbp_vendor_sync program to do the replication. It does the job of both bbpgetvd (new vendor creation) and bbpupdvd (update existing vendor).
But the problem is, we have two number ranges for vendors. One is Numeric and other one is Alpha.
Group -->AB From 0010000000 to 0699999999
Group -->AZ From A to ZZZZZZZZZZ
The vendor synchronization program can consider only one number range at a time i.e.
either Numeric or Alpha. So, we have to switch the active number range
and run the program twice., first for numeric and then for alpha.
In order to avoid this, I'm looking at implementing bbp_transdata_prep which I was told would take care of this issue.
I looked around for documentation/sample code for bbp_transdata badi and couldnt find any on SAP help site or SDN.
Wondering if someone can help with the documentation/sample code and difficuly level of implementing this BADI.
Any help would be highly appreciated and suitable points would be awarded for your help.
Also, if there is another way to solve this issue without implementing transdata badi, pls. let me know.
TIA,
Seyed

Hi
Please go through this ->
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/42/d3b671ba67136fe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Sample BADI Implementation
BADI Definition - BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP
Purpose -> Impl. for BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP, Delete Invalid Mail Addresses
PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA method ->
method IF_EX_BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP~PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <LFS_ADR6> TYPE ADR6.
LOOP AT CT_ADR6 ASSIGNING <LFS_ADR6>.
 IF <LFS_ADR6>-SMTP_ADDR NS '@'.
 DELETE CT_ADR6.
 ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
endmethod.
PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA method ->
method IF_EX_BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP~PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <LFS_ADR6> TYPE ADR6.
LOOP AT CT_ADR6 ASSIGNING <LFS_ADR6>.
 IF <LFS_ADR6>-SMTP_ADDR NS '@'.
 DELETE CT_ADR6.
 ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
endmethod.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

The best way to get help with logic

I was posting in a thread on support for logic which appears to have been deleted. anyway, what I was going to say I think is useful info for people, so I'm going to post it anyway. to the mods - it doesn't contain any speculation about policies or anything like that. just an explanation of my views on the best way to deal with issues people have with logic, which I think is a valuable contribution to this forum.
I think there's a need for perspective. when you buy an apple product you get 90 days of free phone support to get everything working nice and neat. you can call them whenever, and you could actually keep them on the phone all day if you wanted, making them explain to you how to copy a file, install microsoft office, or any number of little questions no matter how simple - what is that red button thingy in my window for?.. on top of that, you've got a 14 day dead on arrival period (or 10 days I can't remember) in which if your machine has any kind of hardware fault whatsoever it's exchanged for a totally new one, no questions asked. a lot of people complain that applecare is overpriced.. and if you think of it just as an extended warranty, then it is a little pricey. but if you are someone that could use a lot of phone support, then it's actually potentially a total bargain. the fact that 2 or more years after you bought a computer, you could still be calling them every single day, asking for any kind of advice on how to use anything on the machine, is quite something. many people on this forum have had problems when they made the mistake of upgrading to 10.4.9 without first creating a system clone or checking first with their 3rd party plug in vendors to make sure it was ok. so, with apple care, you could call them and keep a technician on the phone _all day_ talking you through step-by-step how to back up all of your user data, how to go through and preserve your preferences and any other specific settings you might not want to lose, and then how to rollback to an earlier OS version.. they'll hold your hand through the whole thing if you need them to.
as for applecare support for pro apps like logic, I'd be the first person to agree that it's not great for anyone except beginners and first time users. if you look at what it takes to get even the highest level of logic certification, it's all pretty basic stuff. and logic doesn't exist in a vacuum, there is an entire universe of 3rd party software and hardware, as well as studio culture and advanced user techniques that are going to be totally invisible to some poor phone support guy at apple that did a logic 101. but it's not hard to see that apple are trying to promote a different kind of support culture, it's up to you to decide whether you want to buy into it or not.
the idea is that they are able to provide basic setup support for new users, including troubleshooting. because it's a simpler level of support, at least they can do this well. so there's no reason why any new user with say a new imac and logic can't get up and running with the 90 days of phone support they get for free.
but the thing is, for extremely high end pro users it's a different matter altogether. pro use of logic within the context of say, a studio or a film composition scenario is a very different world. it's almost a nonsense to imagine that apple could even hire people capable of giving useful support for this end of the spectrum, over the phone. there are so many variables, and so many things that require a very experienced studio person or in-work composer to even begin to understand the setup, let alone troubleshoot it. and it's a constantly evolving world, you actually have to be working in it and aware of developments on 3rd party fronts as well as changes in hardware.. not to mention even changes in the culture of studio production and the changed expectations that come from that. there's no way some poor little guy sitting at a help desk at apple can even hope to be privy to that kind of knowledge. it's already good enough that they don't outsource their support staff to india, let alone go out to studios and hire the very people with the skills that should be staying in the studio! not answering phones for apple.
so, given this reality.. companies have two choices. they can either offer an email based support ticket system, which others do. but in my opinion.. this can just be frustrating and only a half-solution. sure you 'feel' like you are getting a response from the people that make the software and therefore must know it.. but it's not really the case due to what I said above. DAWs don't exist in a vacuum, and so much of what you need to understand to help people requires an intimate knowledge of the music industry in which they are working. you still won't get that from steinberg, even if they sort of answer your emails. the other problem is that this kind of system can mean sporadic answers, a lot of tail-chasing, and quite often you won't get an answer that helps you in the end anyway.
the other model is to foster a strong user support culture. some people react in the wrong way to this idea.. they just think it's a big brush off from the manufacturer, saying we don't care, go sort it out yourselves.. but this isn't true. apple has a classification for pro resellers called 'apple solutions expert - audio'. what this means is that these dealers are recognised as audio specialists and they can receive extra support and training from apple for this. but more importantly than this.. most of them are music stores, or pro gear dealerships that are also mac and logic dealers. they already employ people that have worked or do work in the music industry, and are constantly on top of all of this stuff. apple encourages these dealers to run workshops, and to provide expert sales advice in the very niche area that logic is in, which they can do far better than some generic apple store ever could. but most importantly, they are encouraged to offer their own expert after-sales support and whatever other value-adding expertise they can, to get sales. because margins in computer gear are so tight nowadays, discounting is not really a viable option for these dealers to guarantee getting musicians to buy computers and logic setups from them. the only companies that can entice people with a lower price a big online wholesalers or big chain stores. so the best idea for these niche expert stores to get sales is to offer you their own experts to help with configuration, ongoing support and to generally make it a better idea that you bought your system from them rather than from some anonymous online store. I can see the wisdom of this.. it puts the support back out there on the ground where it's needed, and also where it can work best. apple could never hope to offer the same level of expertise in helping a film composer work through some issues with a specific interface or some highly specific issue they have with getting a task done. no big software manufacturer could do this anywhere near as well as people out there that have worked in studios or currently do work in studios. so in my opinion it's a far better model to foster this kind of support culture, along with training courses, books and training video support. also user forums like this one are possibly one of the most valuable ports of call anyone could ask for. apple couldn't replicate this with their own staff, even if they tried. and even if they made a system where some of the people close to logic development were able to answer emails, it would still be nowhere near as useful, as rapid or as capable of being up to speed with logic use out in the real world with 3rd pary gear, as any of these other methods are.
the only thing I think they could do better would be to publish a list of known bugs which are officially recognised. this would help everyone and put an end to a lot of wasted time and speculation on if something is a bug totally to do with logic, or if it's a specific issue raised by a particular configuration.
but really, in my view, a 3rd party support and training culture through a combination of specialist dealers, consultants that literally run a business setting up computers for pro-users and helping them keep it all working, online user-to-user forums and published materials really are the way forward.

In all honesty this is currently the 3rd "logicboard" (motherboard)
in my powerbook due to a design flaw regarding the 2nd memory slot....
Yep. Mine failed five weeks after I bought it. However, I bought it for work and couldn't afford being without it for four weeks while they fixed it, so I had to live with it. My serial number did not entitle me to a replacement either, post Applecare.
My firewire ports have burnt out from a third-party defective device (no hot-plugging involved)
My screen is blotchy (my PW serial number did not entitle me to a replacement).
My battery serial number did not entitle me to a replacement, and is not that good these days.
My guaranteed Powerbook-compatible RAM is actually not, causing RAM related problems, most notably these days meaning that as soon as I switch to battery power, the laptop crashes, so I can only use mains power. The company I bought it from stopped taking my calls and wouldn't replace it after they replaced it once, so I'm stuck with it. And of course, only one ram slot is working, so I can't even use my original stick in the first slot, which would shift the dodgy stuff away from the lower system area.
My power supply failed at the weak spot and caught fire. I managed to break apart the power supply and recable it so I didn't have to buy a new power supply, although the connection at the laptop end is loose (all the more fun that as soon as power is lost, the laptop crashes - see above). The power supply is held together with gaffa tape. Silver gaffer tape though, so it's still kind of 'Appley"...
My internal hard drive is dying - four or five times now it clicks and won't power up, causing the laptop to die.
One foot has fallen off (but glued back on).
The lid is warped.
The hinge is loosish.
The S-Video adaptor cable is intermittent.
But aside from all that, I have looked after it well, and I love it to death. Just as well, because it doesn't look like it will be that long...
But it still "just works". Apart from the battery power obviously. And the ram slot. And the ram. And the screen. And the hard drive. And the firewire ports. And the feet.
But everything apart from the main board, the screen, the case, the hard drive and the power supply works fine. So thats... er..
Hmm.

Collaboration with vendor via Portal?

Hi everyone :
   I meet a problem about collaboration with vendor. Our customer has lots of vendor ,and our customer expect that their vendor could query related R/3 report real-time via Portal on Internet .
   I had done the SSO between Portal and R/3, and the user who had Portal user and R/3 both could access R/3 via Portal easily. We can create user for vendor in Portal easily, but it is impossible that we create user for all of vendors in R/3 , because of R/3 user need to pay for license. So vendors could not query R/3 report via Portal now .
    My problem :
    1. Vendors can't query R/3 report via Portal now.
Is there anyone met this problem ever , and How to solve this problem ?
    2.On the assumption that our vendor can query R/3 report via Portal now, how can we control the authorization that certain vendor could query his data only, can't query other vendor's data ?
    Any advice and discuss is welcome!
Best Regards,
Jianguo Chen
Message was edited by: jianguo chen
Message was edited by: jianguo chen

Hi Brian
which datasource u r using?
i think u used read only LDAP + Databse
when u chang the password for user in portal than after corresponding user password in LDAP directory are not changed thas't why it's generated a message that
password expires and u can't change the password
so try to change the password in LDAP also.
hope it's helps u.
regards,
kaushal

REPORT FOR SOURCE LIST OF MATERIAL WITH VENDOR DESCRIPTION

Dear All
Let me know is any transaction where i will get the material source list similar as me03 transaction but
with vendor name also .
Regards,
Rajendra Sawant.

Hi Rajendar,
I am sorry but the vendor name cannot be displayed in this or any other T-code.
Or you can select the Vendor code for which you want to see the vendor name and clik on the Vendor tab above.
Rwd if helpful.
Regards,
Robin.

Help with GR/IR, can't clear on MR11

Please help with this case:
We had a purchase with delivery cost included. We create MIGO with no problem. (Credit to GR/IR account = $60)
We cancel the delivery cost in MR11. (Debit to GR/IR Account = $60)
After a few months, we restore Delivery Cost in MR11SHOW (Credit to GR/IR account = $50)
Create MIRO to freight vendor in MIRO (Debit to GR/IR account = $60)
As you may see, now can't clear GR/IR account because there's a difference (60 vs 50) and can't use MR11 neither, I get this error:
No data selected. Check selection parameters!!
Message no. CKMLGRIR009
I have tried with so many post, but can't find anything that works....
Thanks in advance!

Hi Mohsin.
After we cancel the delivery cost with MR11 (let's say, in January) the freight vendor asked us for his payment (in April) and then we realised that we need to restore the delivery cost...
What we did is cancel the MR11 document that we had created before... and there's when the difference in GR/IR was generated.....
I hope that this comments makes a little bit clearer my explanation.
Thanks

Raw material stock report with vendor wise

Dear all ,
Can any one tell me , How do I get stock report only on " VENDOR " wise .
The purpose is , I've multiple souces for one Material , I need analyse the available inventory with vendor wise.
Pl.s help
Thanks in Advance
Sekhar

Hi,
1. Once you receive the mateiral inside the plant the identity of vendor is lost.
2. All the stock will get as Plant / Sloc Stock only.
3. Incase if you need vendor wise stock then you need to activate batch management, with Classification view and one characteristics as vendor.
4. And during each GR you need to enter the vendor value
Else you will not be able to seggregate the available stock vendor wise.
reg
dsk

Need help with my Pioneer dvd-rw dvr-115d. HLEP!!

Hello i need help with my G4, i havent been useing it for a while and i started using it again. As i was trying to burn a DVD it didnt read my cd at all even if i put a DVD in there it dont read it just come right back out.. on my mac it shows that is there but not reading . what can i do????!!! i need help with this..
PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-115D:
Firmware Revision:          1.18
Interconnect:          ATAPI
Burn Support:          Yes (Vendor Supported Drive)
Profile Path:          /Library/DiscRecording/DeviceProfiles/PatchBurn-pioneerdvdrwdvr115d.drprof ile
Cache:          2000 KB
Reads DVD:          Yes
CD-Write:          -R, -RW
DVD-Write:          -R, -R DL, -RW, +R, +R DL, +RW
Write Strategies:          CD-TAO, CD-SAO, CD-Raw, DVD-DAO
Media:          Insert media and refresh to show available burn speeds
this is what it say in the system profiler.
Power PC Mac os x 10.5.8

The new user account didn't work?
Or, the firmware flash didn't work?
I would try reconnecting the data ribbon. It is cramped and difficult to get to, but it may be some corrosion or a poor connection causing the issue.
It's worth a try, as the DVR-115 is a good drive. They don't make them any more........
You can find an optical drive installation video (on the following page) to help you with your efforts:
http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/

Need help with Sync/Async BPM Scenario

I have an R/3 RFC -> XI -> HTTP (to vendor A) scenario that is working fine. It is a totally synchronous call event. The Integration Directory pieces sit in a scenario named HotkeyOutbound.
Now I need to create a process for RFC -> XI -> HTTP (to vendor Panduit). The R/3 RFC is the same sender, but vendor Panduit only supports an asynchronous HTTP connection. I followed the Sriram Vasudevan weblog on Sync/Async Bridge and created my BPM. I am stuck on trying to determine what to set up in the Integration Directory.
First off, should I be able to use the same HotkeyOutbound scenario as with vendor A so all hotkey stuff can stay together? Or do I have to create a new scenario with a copy of the R/3 business system for the sender? I moved forward with a new scenario (PanduitHotkeyOutbound).
I also need to know how many config Agreements and Determinations to use. The image at http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/keith1.html shows what I have so far. Which are not needed? What is missing?
And I tried setting up an HTTP communication channel for outbound async to vendor Panduit and another for inbound async from vendor Panduit. XI won't let me set up a sender HTTP channel. Why not?
Thank you in advance.

I have yet to figure this out, and probably need to go back to my Integration Repository setup since my problems may start there. This screenshot shows my Repository objects.
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/intProcess.jpg
HELP! These are the steps I took, with questions embedded.
(1) Created data type and message type for xml document (note that same format is used for request and reply).
(2) Created PANRequestAbstractInterfaceSync (abstract and sync) for first part of Integration Process. Should the input message be the RFC or XML message type?
(3) Created PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync (abstract and async) for 2nd part of Integration Process.
(4) Created PANResponseToBPM_MessageInterface (outbound async) for interface back into XI from partner. Is this needed?
(5) Created PANHotkeySync_to_Async_IntProc Integration Process to handle sync to async bridge.
- Wondering why PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync is the only message interface available when I make container object (PANMessage)?
(6) Created two Message Mappings to handle RFC data to XML mappings (outbound RFC-> XML and inbound XML -> RFC).
(7) Created Interface Mapping that includes both the Request and Response message mapping programs from step six. Source is the RFC and Target is PANRequestAbstractInterfaceSync.
- Do I need another interface mapping with Source being PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync and Target being the RFC?
Link to these steps and app diagram:
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/PAN_Hotkey_Diagram.jpg
Thank you very much for your time.

Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Hello,
We are trying to replicate vendor master records from R/3 to SRM via BBPGETVD. When we go to SLG1, there is an error stating Business Partner XXXX: Invalid Value 0003 for field Authorization Group.
Currently, the AP dept. maintains the field Authorization Group in the Vendor Master Record 'Control' screen with a fixed value of 0003 (LFA1-BEGRU). When the replication occurs, SRM complains that this field value does not exist in a SRM customizing table or is a fixed value.
Do we need to implement the BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP BAdI to pass this value as a fixed value to replicate vendors?
-regards
Shaz Khan

I'm planning to implement bbp_transdata_prep. Wondering if either one of you can help. I've also opened another thread with my specific questions.
Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Rec.acc balance with vendor wise

Hi all,
one rec. acc using for many vendors
how i can get the report
one rec acc balance with vendor wise.
thanks!!
lakshmi,

Hi Lakshmi
you can take this report with the help of ZFBL1N- mention the details and here you can give your recon account towards GL Account. mention the vendor code in the range- genearate report. this will give exactly the same as you are in need.
Regards
Shridhar

Search help with programming

Hai,
Can any one give example for search help with Programming?
I hope we can create search help with help of coding.
With Regards,Jaheer.

yes u can create search help by using match code in programs
for eq
go with abap editor se 38
provide the name of program
parameters : vendor like lfa1-lifnr matchcode object yzob.
double click on yzob
provide description for search help
provide selection method
provide search help parameter
enable check box for import and export
provide lpos
spos
save check activate
press f4 for check and import values i.e it will display a records list available in database table
rewards points please

Infotype to link Personnel Number with Vendor Master Record

Hi All,
pls help me what infotype to link Personnel Number with Vendor Master Record in AP module.
Customer require when Create Employee then system automatic gernerate Vendor Master.
pls help us.
Thanks

Hi,
PRAA works absolutely fine. I have external number range for vendors.
There is an option so that you can create HR accounts in vendor accounts
Path:Accounting> Financial accounting>Travel
management>Personal-Related Master Data> Create Vendors (tr.code PRAA)
Look at this description:
From the HR master data, this program creates a batch input session for
maintaining person-specific vendor master records.
The report can process vendor master records as follows:
o Initial set up (create/add missing company code segment)
o Uupdate (change completely according to vendor and HR reference)
o Change (only according to HR master data, for example, name
Block
The following infotypes from HR master data are taken into account for
the key date specified:
o Actions (Infotype 0000)
o Organizational Assignment (Infotype 0001)
o Personal Data (Infotype 0002)
o Permanent Residence (Infotype 0006 Subtype 1)
o Bank Details (Infotype 0009 Subtype 0 or 2)
All other required data is taken from a reference vendor that you can
specify as a parameter when you start the program. Note that for the
reference vendor, reference data must exist for all company codes that
are applicable according to HR master data. Since program RPRAPA00 cannot
assign vendor master record numbers externally when creating
vendor master records, you must be sure that the reference vendor is
assigned to an account group that requires internal number assignment.
If no house bank is specified in the reference vendor, this is
determined via feature TRVHB (Implementation guide for 'Travel Expenses'
-> Transfer to Data Medium Exchange -> Set up Feature for Determining
House Bank according to the employee's organizational situation.
The link between the HR employee's master record and the corresponding
vendor master record is set up by entering the personnel number in the
company code segment of the vendor master record.
General program flow
Program RPRAPA00 creates a sequential work file in the specified
directory. Ensure that you use a global directory that can be accessed
by all application servers; a directory is automatically proposed. The
work file is later transformed into a batch input session by the
subsequent program RFBIKR00, which is started automatically.
In test run mode this program delivers information messages which
document the creation of a batch input session. Since each information
message must be confirmed manually, the test run should only be
performed for a small number of personnel numbers.
In productive run mode, however, the program RFBIKR00 is automatically
started as a job; the information mentioned above is stored in the job
log in this case.
Initial setup of vendor master records
Corresponding vendor master records are created from the infotypes
listed above and the non-HR-specific information from the reference
vendor. During the process, the personnel number is stored in the
company code segment of the vendor master record. Persons who already
have a vendor master record with corresponding personnel number are
rejected in this run.
If a vendor master record already exists for a personnel number, but
without a company code segment for the company code in which the
employee exists at the key date entered, the program adds the required
company code segment to the vendor master record. You must however
activate the checkbox "Create new company code segment for existing
vendor master records".
The HR master data used is the info type record valid on the key date
entered.
Update of vendor master records
The corresponding vendor master records are updated from the infotypes
listed above and the non-HR-specific information from the reference
vendor. Persons who already have a vendor master record with
corresponding personnel number are rejected in this run. The system uses
HR master data from the infotype records valid for the key date.
Change vendor master records according to HR master data
All HR-specific data is changed in the vendor master records for
personnel numbers that have changes since the date recorded under '...
with last change since'. The system uses HR master data again from the
infotype records valid for the key date specified.
Block vendor master records
All vendor master records which correspond with the selected personnel
numbers are blocked for posting.
User exits
For the following situations, two empty routines are supplied in the
includes RPRAPAEX and RPRAPAEX&H5F001 which you can adapt to your
requirements.
o The employee's last name is entered in the sort field in the vendor
master record. If you do not want this to happen, you can program
the situation you want in the user exit routine
'set&H5Fmc&H5Ffield&H5Fby&H5Fuser'.
o If the address editing in the vendor master record does not suit
your requirements, it can also be changed. For this purpose you have
the user exit routine 'set&H5Faddress&H5Fby&H5Fuser'.
o If you want to assign numbers to the vendor master records to be
created via external number assignment (for example, vendor master
record number &H3D personnel number), you can adjust the user exit
routing 'SET&H5FVENDOR&H5FNO&H5FBY&H5FUSER' (in include RPRAPAEX&H5F00). Note
that
the account group of the reference vendor must also have external
number assignment.
Note that in each case a thorough knowledge of the programming
language
ABAP/4 is necessary.
Set up vendor master records in a separate system
The distribution of personnel master data from a HR system to an FI
system is a prerequisite for creating, changing, and blocking vendor
master records.
In the section Master Data Distribution (link to separate HR unit) of
the ALE IMG, an explanation is given regarding the way in which the
FI
System is supplied with the relevant employee data from the HR System
In the FI System, report RPRAPA00 described here can be used to
create,
change, and block vendor master records.
Other wise try with VPE1 t.code.
Regards
Devi

Shopping cart currency issue with Vendor order currency

Hi,
We are using SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0 with classic scenario.
There is a strange issue :
Vendor order currency EUR.
User currency USD in org plan.but while creating a PO from approved shopping cart in SRM sourcing cockpit it should take vendor currency EUR.but it tooks user currency.why
while checking same shopping cart PO in R/3 it updates with user currency USD (which is in org plan) not with vendor currency EUR.
we don't know why the system is behaving like this.
But when we create a PO directly in R/3 it has taken vendor order currency EUR correctly.
So requesting all please help us where we need to check in SRM or any BADI's are overwritten this. how to debug in SRM.
Thanks in Advance,
Sri

Hi,
can anyone help on this.

Help with vendor enhacement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for