Hide Repeated Key Valuse is not useful in Broadcast Query

Hi,
I have a problem about the setting "Hide repeated key values" is not useful when broadcasting queries by format XML(MS Excel). Our server support package is SP19. Does anyone has the similar problem? Help.
Thanks,
Johnson

Hi Johnson,
Did you solve the issue?
I have faced with same problem.
Thanks
Alkan

Similar Messages

Hide Repeated Key Values Setting Not Saved

Hi Experts,
We are working on BI7. Currently we are changing the Query Properties to display Repeated Key Values. However, whenever we execute the reports, all repeated key values are still hidden. When we return to BEx Designer, the setting is reverted back. Please advise on why this is happening. I am pretty sure we have saved then execute the query.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Juice

Its some problem with Bex I guess.
Go to RSRT, give your query name and do "Generate report".
Execute it in RSRT and check if its fine.
If its fine in RSRT it should reflect in your analyzer too.
Hope this helps.

Hide Repeated Key Values

Dear BW experts,
In the query properties >> on Display Tab within Display options, there is a check box to check or uncheck for "Hide Repeated Key Values".
However to reflect these changes on portal, it is suggested on the following help.sap link that the query iview properties have to changed as well. (please see the note below the link)
I just looked at the query's iview properties but couldnt find a particular property that seems to reflect this change.
Which property on the iview needs to be changed to reflect the "Hide Repeated Key Values" property in BEx.
Please advise...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/5b/30d43b0527a17be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Note: that the setting made to hide repeated key values when using the query as a data provider in Web applications is not evaluated. You need to make the settings again in the property dialog box of the query view. When the query is used in the BEx Analyzer, the settings you make here are taken into consideration.
Thank you...

Hi A.H.P,
In the template, as u suggested, i noticed that the 'Suppress Repeated Texts' under 'Specific'tab had a checkmark already.
I also tested it by removing the checkmark, still it's not giving the expected results.
Current result:
Sales ID_____Comp Code____Division code
xxx_______________aaa_________111
______________________________000
__________________yyy_________123
______________________________345
Expected result:
Sales ID_____Comp Code____Division code
xxx_______________aaa_________111
xxx_______________aaa_________000
xxx_______________yyy_________123
xxx_______________yyy_________345
I got this in the BEx, but it's not reflecting the change in the portal. Please advise with any suggestions...
Thank you....
Message was edited by: Newyorker

Query Designer - Hide Repeated Key Values - Doesn't work in the web

Hello Experts,
I'm facing a problem with a query. The user requested that he/she wants to see all the values of the key values.
I already unchecked the option "Hide repeated key values" in query designer, but it still hiding it. I tested in BEx and it's working fine, but when I run it in the web the key values are being hidden.
Anyone knows what is happening? I'm not using WAD and there is no possibility to use it.
Thanks,
Helder

Hi,
I have seen this problem - setting that option still does not show the repeated key values in web. You will indeed need to use WAD and uncheck that option in the properties of the analysis item. If you can't do that, the other option would be to do this change in the default web template (which is generally 0Analysis_pattern for BI WAD) but note that this will affect all queries.
Also, please note that if the query is exported to excel, it will show the repeated values. This is the reason sometimes the users ask for key values to be repeated - maybe you would want to confirm that.

Hide repeated key values - server wide

Hello all,
does anybody know if there's a setting which sets the "hide repeated key values" query properties server wide, so I don't have to make that setting for each query?
Thanks,
Tudor

Hi
Check in SPRO customization report relevant settings for availability of options like this.
But i think such option is not available in report settings with server level
REgards
M.A

Index not using in select query

Hello All,
I have table CITY with 2 composite primary key CITYCODE, COUNTRYCODE of course they are NOT NULL.
i created an index.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CITYKEY ON CITY     (CITYCODE, COUNTRYCODE);
then i run explain plan as follows
explain plan for
select CityCode, CityName, CountryCode, LexiconId, UserId, Status
from City
where CountryCode = 'IR';
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 803 | 57013 | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| CITY | 803 | 57013 | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
later i analyze table rebuild indexes but again explain plan gives me the same result.
Could any 1 please guide me to solve this issue.
Thanks
Edited by: mohsin javed on Feb 17, 2011 10:10 AM

Hello All,
Again with one more query which having join:
table SDNMASTER with sdnid pk and SDNMASTER_PK index on SDNID, table SDNALIAS sdnid pk and SDNALIAS_PK index on SDNID.
explain plan for
SELECT a.SourceId,
          a.SourceName,
          b.LastName,
          a.Status
FROM SdnMaster a,
          SdnAlias b
WHERE a.SdnId = b.SdnId
AND a.Status in ('1', '3')
AND b.LastName is not null
ORDER BY b.LastName;
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1153036645
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2399 | 64773 | 69 (5)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 2399 | 64773 | 69 (5)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 2399 | 64773 | 68 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SDNALIAS | 2399 | 21591 | 11 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SDNMASTER | 4562 | 82116 | 56 (2)| 00:00:01 |
Even after analyzing table and rebuilding index its not using the index..
Thanks

Virtual Key Figures its not populated when execute query

Hi All
I did a BADI for populate a Virtual Key Figure, I follow the instructions of link
Link:[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60e34f63-f44c-2c10-488e-c89b04e0ca7c?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
In addition I add the code section of data declarated on example of: CL_EXM_IM_RSR_OLAP_BADI section define: IF_EX_RSR_OLAP_BADI~DEFINE, only information that said:
DATA: l_s_chanm TYPE rrke_s_chanm,
 l_kyfnm TYPE rsd_kyfnm.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
 <l_s_chanm> TYPE rrke_s_chanm.
I test the query on RSRT and the virtual Key Figure is "0.00" this look like if the virtual key figure is not populated.
I did other things like:
Set a Break Point on COMPUTE section of my BADI, I saw that the value is assigned, but I don't know how I can continue reviewing the pass of this value to result of query.
I generate again the query on RSRT.
My code is:
IF_EX_RSR_OLAP_BADI~DEFINE
method IF_EX_RSR_OLAP_BADI~DEFINE.
data: L_S_CHANM type RRKE_S_CHANM,
 L_KYFNM type RSD_KYFNM.
field-symbols:
 <L_S_CHANM> type RRKE_S_CHANM.
case I_S_RKB1D-INFOCUBE.
 when 'ZGTO_OB2'.
 append 'ZVIRTKF' to C_T_KYFNM.
endcase.
endmethod.
IF_EX_RSR_OLAP_BADI~COMPUTE
method IF_EX_RSR_OLAP_BADI~COMPUTE.
field-symbols <FS_ZVIRTKF> type any.
P_KYF_ZVIRTKF = 16.
assign component P_KYF_ZVIRTKF of structure C_S_DATA
to <FS_ZVIRTKF>.
<FS_ZVIRTKF> = 10 .
endmethod.
I will appreciate your recommendations, Thanks in advanced.
Al

Thank you very much Sanganya
I saw this:
I put a break point on P_KYF_ZVIRTKF = 16., then I saw that P_KYF_ZVIRTKF obtain value 16.
Then on sentence: assign component P_KYF_ZVIRTKF of structure C_S_DATA
to <FS_ZVIRTKF> , when the system pass this line, I review the sy-subrc and is equal 4, as I understood the ASSIGN sentence did not be complete, the value shoul be 0.
Then when the system try to run the sentence: <FS_ZVIRTKF> = 10 the system send an Execution error that say: GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED...
Error analysis
 You attempted to access an unassigned field symbol
 (data segment 32780).
 This error may occur if
 - You address a typed field symbol before it has been set with
 ASSIGN
 - You address a field symbol that pointed to the line of an
 internal table that was deleted
 - You address a field symbol that was previously reset using
 UNASSIGN or that pointed to a local field that no
 longer exists
 - You address a global function interface, although the
 respective function module is not active - that is, is
 not in the list of active calls. The list of active calls
 can be taken from this short dump.
Exactly the line selected with error is:
>>>> <fs_zvirtkf> = '10.0'.
I will appreciate your help
Thank you
Al

Subreport as a reportparam not using the proper query

I am trying to use a report with a subreport, normally works fine, but I want to pass a query to the subreport, not let it use its internal query. This works fine if I call the sub report by itself and hand it the query. AS a report it runs fine. When I use it as a reportparam it ignores the query. Very very frustrating.

HI Martin,
i am not realy sure what you want!?!?
i think you want to display only a part of the values you read from XYZ
so what you can do:
write all the values in an array.
the size of the array is the max. value of the slide bar
now you can select a part of the array (e.g. values from 100 to 200) and display this with a graph
the other option is to use the history function of the graphes
regards
timo

Can we filter the Key figure ( by not using Bex Conditions)

Hello Friends,
I have a requirement in which I am passing the result of one query "A" to another query "B" ( using replacement path). Also there is a requirement to filter the keyfigure of the query "A"
Problems I face:
1) If I use Conditions, it does'nt filter the actual rows from the info cube, but just the query result
2) Hence when I pass the query result of "A" to query "B", it sends more records which I dont need.
Question:
Hence is it possible to filter the keyfigure values at the database level?
Thanks... Hope some one will guide me.....................

Hi,
I've had a similar problem in the past, not specifically for a replacement path but because the number of rows returned by the query was too great to use conditions. In the end what I did was create a characteristic char version of the key figure that was loaded from the same source as the key figure. You then effectively have a key figure that can be filtered in the same way as a normal characteristic.
Hope this helps.
Gareth

Index is not using for this query

I have this query and it doesn't use index. Can you put your suggestion please?
SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_HASH(IC_GSMRELATION) USE_HASH(IC_UTRANCELL) USE_HASH(IC_SECTOR) USE_HASH(bt) */
/* cp */
bt.value value,
bt.tstamp tstamp,
ic_GsmRelation.instance_id instance_id
FROM
xr_scenario_tmp IC_GSMRELATION,
xr_scenario_tmp IC_UTRANCELL,
xr_scenario_tmp IC_SECTOR,
rg_busyhour_tmp bt
WHERE
bt.instance_id != -1
AND (IC_GSMRELATION.entity_id = 133)
AND (IC_GSMRELATION.parentinstance_id = ic_UtranCell.instance_id)
AND (IC_UTRANCELL.entity_id = 254)
AND (IC_UTRANCELL.parentinstance_id = ic_Sector.instance_id)
AND (IC_SECTOR.entity_id = 227)
AND (IC_SECTOR.parentinstance_id = bt.instance_id);
table : xr_scenario_tmp
entity_id          num
instance_id          num
parentinstance_id     num
localkey          varchar
indexes: 1. entity_id+instance_id
     2. entity_id+parentinstance_id
table : rg_busyhour_tmp
instance_id     notnull     num
tstamp          notnull     date
rank          notnumm     num
value               float
index: instance_id+tstamp+rank
thanks

user5797895 wrote:
Thanks for the update
1. I don't understand where to put {}. you meant in the forum page like below
Use the tag. Read the [FAQ|http://wiki.oracle.com/page/Oracle+Discussion+Forums+FAQ?t=anon] for more information. It's the link on the top right corner.
>
2. AROUND 8000 IN DEV MACHINE. BUT 1.5M IN PRODUCTION
It's a more or less useless exercise if you have that vast difference between the two systems. You need to test this thoroughly using a similar amount of data.
3.
Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE' is old version
You need to re-create your PLAN_TABLE. That's the reason why important information is missing from your plans. It's the so called "Predicate Information" section below the execution plan and it requires the correct version of the plan table. Drop your current plan table and re-run in SQL*Plus on the server:
@?/rdbms/admin/utlxplan
to re-create the plan table.
Dynamic sampling doesn't alter the plan in any way no matter what sampling level I choose.
When I added Cardinality it switched from 1 full table scan and 2 index read
Can you post the statements with the hints included resp. just the first line including the hints used for the different attempts?
# WITH dbms_stats.gather_table_stats, without cardinality it uses indexes all the time.
How did you call DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS, i.e. which parameter values where you using?
# After deleting the table stats performance improved back
All these different attempts are not really helpful if you don't say which of them was more effective than the other ones. That's why I'm asking for the "Predicate Information" section so that this information can be used to determine which of your tables might benefit from an indexed access path and which don't.
As already mentioned several times if you use SQL tracing as described in one of the links provided you could see which operation produces how many rows. This would allow to determine if it is efficient or not.
But given that you're doing all this with your test data it doesn't say much about the performance in your production environment.
4. whether GTT created with "ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS"?
YES - BUT DIFFERENT SESSIONS HAS DIFFERENT NUMBER OF ROWS
The question is, whether the number of rows differs significantly, if yes, then you shouldn't use the DBMS_STATS approach
5. neigher (48 sec. / 25 sec. run time) are sufficient, then what is the expected?
ACTUALLY I AM DOING IT IN DEVELOPMENT MACHINVE. IN PRODUCTION THE NUMBER OF ROWS ARE DIFFERENT. LAST TIME WHEN WE RELEASED THE
PATCH WITH THIS CODE, THE PERFORMANCE WAS BAD.
See 2., you need to have a suitable test environment. It's a more or less useless exercise if you only have a fraction of the actual amount of data.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Repeat a song not using iTunes

hey- i am having trouble with my battery life and the help center recommended that i try my own battery test; they told me to charge it and such, but to also just put a song on repeat and see how long the ipod lasts... but i have no idea how to repeat a song by not using iTunes and by using only my iPod nano...
All help will be appreciated!
Thanks
wytod

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
On your iPod go to settings-->repeat-->all (or once)
Are these the instructions you are using? If not, this is the best way to test the battery...
How To Determine Your iPods Battery Life
Also, here are some more helpful links on battery life...
Tips And Tricks For iPod Battery
iPod Battery Unplugged
Caring For iPod Battery
About the iPod Battery
btabz

Undo Suppress Repeated Key Values

Hi,
My reports need a format whereby all repeated key values appear on the report and not be suppressed. I have unchecked the query property and when I run it as a workbook, it works fine and as expected. But when I publish it in the portal or run the query through the web browser, it hides repeated key values. I read the forum and found out about the Web item value change in the Web table. I have informed my portal guy to look into that table and make the change if it makes sense to him. Here as a process, we cannot use WAD and change the look and feel of the report.Everything follows a standard portal look and the portal guy uses the technical name of the query to publish it.
Is what I want to do possible? If yes, am I missing something here that I can try out in the meanwhile?
Thanks in advance,
Kanchana

You can add the following to the URL:
&ITEM=Table_webitem_name&SUPPRESS_REPETITION_TEXTS="
Thanks,
Jeff

Repeat key Values in Webtemplate output

Hello friends,
I have a requirement wherein, when I execute the webtemplate, I need to have the key values repeated in the output. I am using a customized template for my reports and I dont want to change this base template. I am using 3.5 webtemplates.
Please let me know how this can be achieved.
<removed>
Thanks
mvd

Hi ,
To not suppress repeated texts, two things are need.
1) In your web template, add the following line to the Template Properties object tag (the tag at the very top of the web template in HTML mode):
<param name="SUPPRESS_REPETITION_TEXTS" value=""/>
2) In your query, in Properties and on the Display tab, uncheck "Hide Repeated Key Values".
Hope this will help.
Thanks
Mukesh

Show Repeated key values in Reports and Export Into Excel

Hi Experts,
Currently I am working on the BW3.5 version. Our client requirement to display the repeated key value in web and export same into excel. I have followed the steps in web template which mentioned below to achieve the requirement.
1) In my web template, add the following line to the Template Properties object tag (the tag at the very top of the web template in HTML mode):<param name="SUPPRESS_REPETITION_TEXTS" value=""/>
After the change web template change, Myself execute the report in web, Its fine web. But I export into excel, again the key values are suppressed. So I have followed the steps in query. Then its fine. I mean, I can export into excel with repeated key values.
2) In my query, in Properties and on the Display tab, unchecked "Hide Repeated Key Values".
But do we have any other option without changing query properties to achieve the requirement.. I am fine with the web template change("SUPPRESS_REPETITION_TEXTS"). But I do not want to change the query properties.
Please help me to fix the issue. Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
RR

Hi Experts,
I have come across one of the suggestion in the below location. Could you plz help me to implement it.
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=118185
Suggestion:
You can do exactly what you want, but it will take either a button changing the properties of the web item or a javascript function added to the context menu getting the properties of the table item and changing it to "X" or "". These are just two examples, there are other ways to do this. This is the actual code that sets the suppression for the repeated texts. Hope this helps.
SAP_BW_URL item=âu20ACu2122TABLE_1âu20ACu2122 SUPPRESS_REPETITION_TEXTS=âu20ACu2122Xâu20ACu2122
Thanks,
RR

Maximum number of characteristics and Key figures used in a Query

Hi Experts,
Any Thought on the maximum number of Characterstics and key figures that can used in a Query. I know it impacts performance query and runs for very long time.
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi Kumar,
Welcome to SDN.
I really did not think about it till now, sharing my thoughts on this -
1. You can use all the characteristics & Key Figure ( & more)in Query what you have in you Cube.
2. Query is suppose to serve a purpose, to deliver you analytics based on some KPI etc & it will have maximum no of char / key figures which human mind could make some sense of.
3. Performance of query actually is divided into three areas -
a. database time
b. OLAP time
c. Front End time
and if you query on not performing well first look at which area is taking maximum time & the optimize that first & there are various ways to optimize each area.
Hope it helps.
VC

Hide Repeated Key Valuse is not useful in Broadcast Query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for