High-level C interface to OCI?

The OCI seems a little unfriendly in places, for example unnecessarily requiring you to pass string lengths when passing string parameters, using made-up types (e.g. ub4) when native types would probably do, and generally requiring the application developer to do a lot more work than necessary. Aside from going to Pro*C, is there an available higher-level abstraction of the OCI?
Thanks.

Some of this is a holdover from earlier days and versions also not all data types were the same across all the platforms OCI was ported to (16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit). You needed types that could be considered absolute (like UB4). Now you are more likely to be able to use a -1 length when passing in a null-terminated string as well.

Similar Messages

Modify High Level User Interface

Respected Sir
i am using MIDP2.0 for my application. i want to modify some High
Level User Interface in my application. i mean that for TextBox
High Level User Interface i want to change(Modify) TextBox
predefined size , color,etc.... Is it Possible. if is then plz give
me some Clue.
thankx in advanse
Souvik

use setPreferredSize
and setLayout
functions
though for color there is nothing

Recording my voice at a higher level

Hi All,
I am recording my voice for a podcast on garageband. I am speaking directly into my mic, which is attached to my computer. How can I record my voice at a higher level. The output is not loud enough and the "track line" is almost flat. How do I change it so I can record at a higher level!
Thanks!

Roger Wilmut1 wrote:
You will need a mixer or a microphone preamplifier. The audio input on Macs is line level - for example the 'tape' output from a hifi - and is insufficiently sensitive for a microphone.
Hi, Roger,
I was looking at the Behringer Podcast Studio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/481377-REG/Behringer_PODCASTUDIO_FIREWIRE_ PODCASTUDIO_FIREWIRE_Bundle.html#features
and was wondering if this would work for a first-time podcast? Is it better to pick the items up piecemeal? I was thinking of the Behringer 1202 (Xenyx or UB) as it has 2 more (total of 4) XLR inputs and it's going for about $75. However, the Firewire audio interface with the studio package alone is going for *$77*. It seems that the combo would be more economical, but I don't want to sacrfice quality too much.
Is a Griffin iMic USB audio interface (or a Behringer UCA202 - Low Latency 2 Input / 2 Output USB/Audio Interface with Digital Output) just as good at around $30?
I already have a several mics, some XLR, some 1/4" jacks -- condenser & dynamic.
Eventually, I'd like to record a podcast with around 3-5 people all doing a round-table type discussion.
Thanks for any input, Deborah
PS like the Behringer mixer because of the CD/tape input, also, so that I can digitize old cassette tapes.

SUS - Added Data Type Enhancement and Higher level Proxies are not active

Hello,
I've added a field to our current data type enhancement Z_Purchase_Order_Item. Once I regenerate the proxy on the enhancement and activate it the field appears as it should in the high level items that use the enhancement (PurchaseOrderRequest_In). But those proxies have become inactive and when I try to activate them I get this message:
Interface II_BBPX1_SUS_PO was repaired before the Modification Assistant was enabled.
All Modification Assistant functions only apply to future modifications, not to those already
undertaken. This means:
-The modification overview only displays future modifications.
-When resetting to the standard, the system will reset all objects to their current version, since
the actual standard can no longer be identified by the Modification Assistant.
-Support for adjustment after an upgrade will only be available for future modifications.
Modifications that already exist must be re-made manually using version management.
The next message says:
Object can only be created in SAP package.
Then the status bar shows "Proxy Activated". But when I close and reopen the proxy I see that it is once again inactive.
Does any know what I need to do to activate this proxy?
Thanks,
Matt

In SPROXY you can open your proxy and then view the Activation Log under the GoTo menu. The log will explain better what the problems might be. In my case I needed to activate another data type enhancement first.
Thanks,
Matt

Errors in the high-level relational engine on Schedule Refresh Correlation ID: 7b159044-c719-41f9-8d0f-da6f73576d6e

Connections are all valid and work when I setup the Refresh but when the schedule refresh occurs I get this error:
Errors in the high-level relational engine. The following exception occurred while the managed IDataReader interface was being used: The Data Transfer Service has encountered a fatal error when performing the data upload. The remote server returned
an error: (400) Bad Request. The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. Transfer client has encountered a fatal error when performing the data transfer. The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. The remote server returned an error:
(400) Bad Request.;transfer service job status is invalid Response status code does not indicate success: 400 (Bad Request).. The current operation was cancelled because another operation in the transaction failed.
It is trying to refresh 3 simple tables with less than 9,000 rows each.
Also, i'd like to add that the refresh works right from excel as well...
Another fact just in, it seems to work on one out of 3 tables sometimes, so first table gets a success on the log, but sometimes it fails (It succeed twice and failed once with the above error). The second table never succeeds and gets the error above.
The 3rd table never even gets attempted.
Am I running into some sort of timeout perhaps?
loading
Failure
Correlation ID:
7b159044-c719-41f9-8d0f-da6f73576d6e
04/01/2015
at 01:50 AM
04/01/2015
at 01:53 AM
00:03:14
Power Query - Sendout_Records Not tried
Power Query - Positions Errors in the high-level relational engine. The following exception occurred while the managed IDataReader interface was being used: The Data Transfer Service has encountered a fatal error when performing the data upload. The
remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. Transfer client has encountered a fatal error when performing the data transfer. The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request. The remote
server returned an error: (400) Bad Request.;transfer service job status is invalid Response status code does not indicate success: 400 (Bad Request).. The current operation was cancelled because another operation in the transaction failed.
Power Query - Position_Activities Success.

This is not because of the number of rows, instead its the execution time. The query takes more than 7 mins to execute and seems this fails the refresh process.
Thank You

How to perform high-level planning without doing full costctr-level rollup

I am wondering what my options are for this effort - we want to start our 2009 budget season by first preparing a high-level 2009 plan. To do the high-level plan we'd like to avoid building and interfacing workbooks at the cost center level; instead, to get started, we want to look at groups of cost centers that represent the different lines of business of the Bank (retail, credit, etc).
Here's my question:is it possible to build planning workbooks not at the cost center level, but at a cost center rollup level? That is, we'd like to avoid having 10 workbooks at the cost center level that make up the rollup "Mortgage Lending"; instead we want one workbook for Mortgage lending that includes data for all 10 of those CC's.
Please let me know if you have any ideas as to how to do so, thanks, W

I am wondering what my options are for this effort - we want to start our 2009 budget season by first preparing a high-level 2009 plan. To do the high-level plan we'd like to avoid building and interfacing workbooks at the cost center level; instead, to get started, we want to look at groups of cost centers that represent the different lines of business of the Bank (retail, credit, etc).
Here's my question:is it possible to build planning workbooks not at the cost center level, but at a cost center rollup level? That is, we'd like to avoid having 10 workbooks at the cost center level that make up the rollup "Mortgage Lending"; instead we want one workbook for Mortgage lending that includes data for all 10 of those CC's.
Please let me know if you have any ideas as to how to do so, thanks, W

High-Level LabView Control System Engineer Job Opening - Seattle

High-Level LabView Control System Engineer Job Opening - Seattle
Seattle Safety is looking for a qualified individual to fill an opening for Senior Software Controls Engineer. Seattle Safety designs, manufactures, and installs advanced crash test sled systems that are used in automotive and aeronautical industries. The duties of the Controls Engineer include:
Maintain existing control software code base, written in LabVIEW (including the Real-Time Module).
Improve existing software based on requirements and requests from customers and colleagues.
Troubleshoot and repair any functional software bugs that may arise.
Continuously investigate opportunities for system improvement through new or alternative hardware or software approaches.
Support installations of crash test equipment at on-site locations worldwide.
Provide technical support for team members locally and abroad in subject matters concerning performance, installation, and maintenance of software and data acquisition hardware.
Maintain professional relationships with suppliers and vendors in order to keep up with industry developments.
Furthermore, the ideal candidate would possess the following skills:
Intermediate-to-advanced knowledge of LabVIEW.
Ability to analyze empirical data against theoretical predictions to enhance and improve mathematical model of system.
Familiarity with data acquisition concepts and hardware.
Ability to troubleshoot electrical and electronic systems at the module and equipment level.
Discipline and organization with respect to software maintenance and version management. Experience with source configuration management tools a plus (CVS, ClearCase, Perforce, etc.)
Experience with sophisticated high-speed feedback control systems
General skills in areas such as frequency domain analysis, systems analysis, digital filtering, and both linear and non-linear signal processing.
BSEE, BSME or BS Physics may be a good fit, but not limited to these areas.
Ability to work both alone and with colleagues to solve problems and to weigh the merits of differing approaches.
Pay is commensurate with skills and qualifications of the applicant.
Contact:
Seattle Safety
Tom Wittmann
(253)395-4321
1222 6th Av N
Kent, WA 98032
[email protected]
Attachments:
ServoSled Brochure.pdf ‏1215 KB

Dear Sir / Madam,
I am an experienced engineering professional skilled in Post Silicon Validation by Automating using LabVIEW, Power Measurements, Jitter Measurement & Analysis, Audio Characterizations, Silicon Validation Test Cases, Multi-Channel Data acquisition and Triggering using NI DAQ Cards, Control Systems, Serial Communications using VISA and Serial I/O Interface, Code Native Interfaces, Call Library functions to interface with third party and custom dlls, ATMEL and PIC Micro Controller programming, Temperature Controllers like Honeywell, ESPEC-641, TestEquity 115, Hand held terminal programming to drive servo motors, C/C++/VB Programming for developing embedded applications.
Good experience on Windows API, protocol implementations, ARM11 & ARM7TDMI on-chip programming using Register Map and Pinout Specs using C/C++ Metrowerks Code Warrior and MULTI-ICE for ARM Debugger.
Looking for L1/H1 Job
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please find an attachment of my resume in MS-Word format.
Sincerely yours,
K.Sowjanya. B.Tech
Message Edited by Support on 04-04-2008 08:39 AM

Low-Level or High-Level for GUI ?

I am developing a MIDLet that has to run CLDC-1.1 MIDP-2.0 Devices. The MIDLet has a simple user interface, and there is no gaming. I developed the MIDLet using the high-level GUI class, but I discovered that this class is nice, yet limited. Now I am investigating using the low level canvas class for the GUI. Is it possible to maintain cross-platform compatibility with the canvas, or should I stick with the high-level class?

High Level Group
Classes provided are
     Perfect for development of MIDlets that target the maximum number of devices
     Heavily abstracted to provide minimal control over their look and feel
     Classes do not provide exact control over their display
Low Level Group
Classes provided are
     Perfect for MIDlets where we want precise control over the location and display of the UI elements
     If more control there is comes less portability It may not be deployable on certain devices
Cheers,
Rohan Chandane

Very High-Level Question on Approach (PI ccBPM or CE7.1?)

All -
I have a very high-level question. I am not current on what would be the appropriate tool for my scenario.
My scenario...
Transitioning business to use new sales order system.
This will be a phased roll-out, not Big Bang.
Company ordering website needs to send orders to one of two systems (new and old).
Assume order has a flag or some other value that is an indicator to which backend application it should be sent.
Each recieving application has an order insert web service, which would be in PI 7.1's ESR.
What we "envision" is that there would be some kind of fronting web/enterpise service that would read the "flag", then pass the message to the appropriate web service (and on to the appropriate application).
But I really am not clear how to architect this, if any rules "engines" (ccBPM or in CE 7.1) would be or should be used.
You opinions are welcome...
Thank you for your time...

Hi Eric,
It would be more elegant , if you can classify this orders logically and provide two user interfaces one for each type.
But coming back to your question , if you are planning to implement the process in BPM , you could utilize the capabilities of BRM for this purpose . BRM comes with CE 7.1 and works in conjunction with BPM.
[BRM Help|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-rules-management]
Once you want a complete roll out , you can remove the BRM decision making.Logically this would solve the purpose. ccBPM is not really positioned for this approach. It can be used when you need to interact with multiple systems using different protocols.
Caveat : The use of BPM will restrict your UI to WebDynpro Java (atleast for now). The whole process needs to be built around webservices or RFCs.
Regards
Bharathwaj

RFC: Proposing a high level iteration facility based on Collections

I am requesting for comments for an experimental package I developed providing a high level facility for iteration on Java 2 Collections.
You can browse the javadoc at http://www.cacs.louisiana.edu/~cxg9789/javautils/ and the code is available for download from http://www.cacs.louisiana.edu/~cxg9789.
Basically, the package provides an interface Task that has a single method job() which is called for every element in a given collection. There are some static methods for using this kind of scheme and iterating over collections. An example would be: Iteration.loop(collection, new Task() {
          public void job(Object o) {
            // do something on o here
        });Now you may wonder what is the use of going into this much trouble when I can just get an iterator and do the same thing? Well, creating a class that represents the whole iteration opens a number of new possibilities. You can now have methods and variables exclusive for the specific iteration and reuse it. You can even subclass it for variants. This proved very useful in my application especially when I developed the StringTask class that is available in the same package.
Nevertheless, you can see it for yourself that we've got rid of the iterator and the condition checking that appears in conventional loop constructs. For details you can look at the Iteration at http://www.cacs.louisiana.edu/~cxg9789/javautils/edu/ull/cgunay/utils/Iteration.html and StringTask at http://www.cacs.louisiana.edu/~cxg9789/javautils/edu/ull/cgunay/utils/StringTask.html
I was wondering if you Java developers would find such a scheme useful. Thanks for your interest..

Heh... now I need to remember back...
No I don't, the internet comes to the rescue :-) I
was wrong, apply is the simple "function apply"
function, the list function of interest was (is)
called map.
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~paull/cs1011/hof.html
This was very helpful. Now I know what you're saying. Actually this may very well be the hidden influence that lead to this system. The map operation also exists in Lisp and Scheme. I remember really liking it when I first learned about it.
My approach isn't exactly the same as neither of map, fold or filter. But I think I can create subclasses of Task which act the same way with these. I will try to do this in the near future.
Just as a comment on the design, I would have
maneuvered the list of getSomeResult() into an object
that knows how to render itself as a String. That may
well be using your Iteration feature over the internal
list, or other feature as the developer sees fit.This point is well taken. Actually my program uses this kind of approach in many places, however I wanted to give a less confusing example here.
Your iteration is a perfectly valid pattern to iterate
over a collection, and one that could be
applied in many places in my code. I'm unsure I
will migrate to use it, because it tends
towards a large number of small objects to perform its
function... which sometimes can be a simplification,
but in this case can obscure multi-threading issues...
spreading a loop over a collection across multiple
classes makes it less obvious what is happening to the
contents, or what synchronization is required, what
locks have been acquired, or what concurrent
modifications are possible.On the other hand, it might be more secure to have operations on collections in a place as an Iteration class to keep them together. Maybe you already mentioned it in your message. I can understand your concern in using the system, though.
To keep this information in one place, you could use
an anonymous inner class, but then you have lost the
reusability and succinctness of the iteration, which
are two of its largest benefits (Being a high-level
function using centralised, tested code being the
third, and probably the largest)I started using small inner classes very extensively. Maybe this can alleviate the problem, since they're not anonymous and can be reused. However, there is still a problem using (subclassing) them from outside of the class. I found a way to do this, too. It only works in special situations, though.
Assume you have an inner class:
public class Outer {
class Inner { ... }
}You can extend this inner class if you have another class extending the Outer:
class NewOuter extends Outer {
class Inner extends Outer.Inner { ... }
Thinking about it, your iteration is at a higher level
than foreach... and would benefit from using it
if were ever supported by the JVM. They are slightly
orthogonal approaches to looping abstraction, foreach
being syntactic and your pattern being heuristic.We're in tune here, I'd be interested to use the foreach operator and the Iterable interface as primitives in my system if they will ever be provided in Java. Currently, they are not offering me anything extra, since the Collection interface provides me with what I need.

How to pass High Level Indicator (HLI) for Components?

Purchase Order has to pass from one system 1 (SAP) to another system 2 (SAP) and to create Sales Order in the system 2 automatically through ALE IDOCs.
How to pass HLI from one system to another using IDOCS? Which segments need be passed and how? help me with this. Thank you.

Hello Cnu,
Welcome to SDN.
High Level Design gives you an overview of what you are going to do to get the desired result (without going deep technical config. details)
Eg: What interfaces are you going to use ? Where you are going to load the data(including staging) ? How the reports are delivered ? How the Application Support is provided ? etc..
For a generic description of High Level Design see this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-level_design
by the way, who is your client in Aus. I am from Syd.
Cheers
Praveen

HDMI Audio not working on Q190 (along with all higher level Audio Formats)

Help, I have been given the run around via support, I cannot get the HDMI audio to work with my Pioneer Surround Sound, only the Intel display audio shows in control panel (Win 8 X64) and the RealteK S/P Dif port and it is not capable of supporting 7.1 sound or bitstreaming or DTS, Dolby HD, Etc. Tec support appears not capable of fixing the issue and wanted to send me to software support and pay. I have only had the machine for 4 days and it has never supported higher level sound.
Every other device I have (had or currently) connected to the receiver works just fine. I have to figure this out or return the machine, the audio is the most important aspect for me. Besides when you advertise 7.1 support the machine you sell should be able to do it.

Hey guys,
I have had this Q190 with the Celeron CPU since last week and I am using XBMC Frodo and the HDMI is connected to my AVR Onkyo TX-NR809 and from the Onkyo to the TV. And the sound is 7.1 with PLIIZ. It works fine. I think it may be some driver problem because Realtek Audio which is in the Q190 works fine with the Win8 preinstalled. Realtek is kind of bad with driver because I lost my wifi after upgrading to Win 8.1. After a few days with no wifi, I found out that the driver was bad, yes it was a Realtek wifi driver but posted by Lenovo for W 8.1.
I have another friend who also just bought the Q190 and he reported no audio problem so I think it is just a matter of trouble shooting the drive and configuration. I do love the form factor of the Q190.

Running a Sub-VI and monitoring data that is generated on a higher level VI

Hi All,
This question must been there before, but I cannot find a suitable answer here on the forums....
I have a 'top-level' VI that does a lot of things. I also have a sub VI that runs a frequency sweep on a piece of equipment. This is done with a for loop.
Problem:
I want to monitor/access the data that is generated in the for loop (See attached, the 3 wires within the green circle I want to monitor).
2 Questions:
How can I access the data on the wires (within the loop) from a higher level VI?
How can I then run this VI in a higher level VI while the higher level VI is continuing and not waiting for the sub-VI to complete?
I tried using a Que but I cannot seem to get that working.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Attachments:
LV problem.PNG ‏44 KB

The queue is a good way to move data from a running subVI to another VI. Your problem is that if the subVI is inside a loop in the main VI, that loop in the main VI cannot iterate until the subVI completes. The solution: have the sub VI running in parallel - not inside - the loop.
Look at the Producer/Consumer Design Patterns (at File >> New... >> VI >> From Template >> Frameworks >> Design Patterns >> Producer/Consumer. This may be more than you need at the moment but will show how the parallel code process works.
Lynn

Basic XML Publisher Question: How to access tags in the higher levels?

Hi All,
We have a basic question in XML Publisher.
We have a xml hierarchy like below:
<CD_CATALOG>
<CATALOG>
<CAT_NAME> CATALOG 1</CAT_NAME>
<CD>
<TITLE>TITLE1 </TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST1 </ARTIST>
</CD>
<CD>
<TITLE> TITLE2</TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST2 </ARTIST>
</CD>
</CATALOG>
<CATALOG>
<CAT_NAME> CATALOG 2</CAT_NAME>
<CD>
<TITLE>TITLE3 </TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST3 </ARTIST>
</CD>
<CD>
<TITLE> TITLE4</TITLE>
<ARTIST>ARTIST4 </ARTIST>
</CD>
</CATALOG>
</CD_CATALOG>
We need to create a report like below:
CATALOG_NAME     CD_TITLE     CD_ARTISTCATALOG 1     TITLE1     ARTIST1
CATALOG 1     TITLE2     ARTIST2
CATALOG 2     TITLE3     ARTIST3
CATALOG 2     TITLE4     ARTIST4
So we have to loop at the level of <CD> using for-each CD. But when we are inside this loop, we cannot access the value of CAT_NAME which is at a higher level.
How can we solve this?
Right now, we are using the work-around of set_variable and get_Variable. We are setting the value of CAT_NAME inside an outer loop, and using it inside the inner loop using get_variable.
Is this the proper way to do this or are there better ways to do this? We are running into troubles when the data is inside tables.

you can use
<?../CAT_NAME?>copy past to your template
<?for-each:CD?> <?../CAT_NAME?> <?TITLE?> <?ARTIST?> <?end for-each?>

Where can I find various high level examples of workflows being used

I am about to start a project with TCS 3.5 and have been participating in the Adobe webinars to help learn components and specific techniques but what I am lacking is an understanding of various workflows I can model my project after or take bits from various sources. Why start with Framemaker in this workflow versus RoboHelp or even Word? Questions like this I think come from experience with the process and I am thinking that what I am getting myself into is a chessgame with all these pieces and don't want to paint myself into a corner by traveling down one route. I have seen this graphic:
And this one:
And this one:
But they are too generic and do not contain enough information to really understand the descision making process one must go through on various projects.
Can we have a series of webinars made, all with the underlining theme of defining a working process or workflow, by having guests describe how they have or are using this suite in real life on their own projects? One that might include a graphic showing the routes taken through the suite with reasons why?
My project hopes to make a single source internal site that will tie together various 3D portable industrial coordinate metrology systems (hardware and software). It would be used as a dispersal site for help, communications between users and SME, OEM information, QA requirements, established processes, scripting snipet downloads, statistics, and training (including SOJT). Portable industrial metrology has 8 different softwares that are used and right now about 8 different instruments. These include laser trackers and radars, articulated arms, scanners, structered white and blue light to name a few. The softwares include Spatial Analyzer, Veriserf, CompIT, eMscon, AXYZ to a few there as well. I want to be able to participate and add content to an internal Sharpoint site, push content to users for stand-alone workstations, ePub, capture knowledge leaving the company through attrition, develop easy graphic rich job aid sheets, and aid in evaluations of emergent software and hardware. I would also like to leave the option open to use the finished product as a rosetta stone like translator between the software packages; doing this is the equivelent of doing this in these other software pacages for example.

PDF is definately a format I want to include, to collaborate with other divisions and SME for one reason, but also for the ease in including 3D interactive target models with in it and portability. I plan on being able to provide individual PDFs that are very specific in their topics and to also use them to disperse user guides, cheat sheets or job aids... something the user may want to laminate on their own and keep with them for reference, printed out. Discussion in these sheets would be drasticly reduced to only the elements, relying heavely on bullet points or steps, usfull graphs, charts and tables... and of course illustrative images. I am thinking that these should be downloadable buttons to print on each topic section, not in a general apendix or such. They would hopefully be limited to one page, double sided 8x10.
The cheet sheet would have a simplistic flow chart of how or where this specific topic fits in the bigger picture,
The basic steps,
Illustrations, equipment, setup
Software settings for various situations in a table or chart,
Typical result graph to judge with,
Applicable QA, FAA regulation settings or concerns,
Troubleshooting table,
Topic SME contact info
On the back, a screen shot infographic of software process
The trouble here is that I have read that FM has a problem sometimes in succesfully transfering highly structured or formatted material to RoboHelp. Does this then mean that I would take it from FM straight to PDF?
Our OEM material is very high level stuff... basicly for engineers and not shop floor users... but that is not to say they don't have some good material that could be useful. Our internal content is spread out across many different divisions and continents, with various ways of saying the same thing. This leads QA to interpret the information differently depending where the systems are put to work. We also have FAA requirements that need to be addressed and reminded to the user.
Our company is starting to also see an exodus of the most knowledagble of the users through retirement. Capturing the knowledge and soft skill packages they have developed working here for 20-30 years is something I am really struggling with. I have only come up with two ideas so far:
Internal User Web based Forum
Interviews (some SMEs do not want to make the effort in transfering knowledge by participating in anything if it requires an effort they don't see of benefit to themseleves), to get video, audio or transcription records

High-level C interface to OCI?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for