Higher Sampling rate... in logig

no one know certainly the tecnical limit of time recording at 96 or 192Khz in logic? In the next update It can be fixed?... I can record only 62 minutes at 192!!!!

the difference between a 48khz to 192khz is not only in the possibility to reach a 50khz frequencies (a man whit good hear can reach 18khz... good hear),
in a 192khz sample rate there are the same quality of the best audio recorder in the world: the last analog tape machine at 9,5... Studer, Otary etc... they are totally real and a 192khz why a good converter A/D and custom electronics component give u in paradise!!! ... I have to buy a new mac pro but if these problem in logic dont be fixed I need to wait!
(I have SOME space on the HD, is enought 900Gb of free space?)

Similar Messages

How to build a array with high sampling rates 1K

Hi All:
Now I am trying to develop a project with CRio.
But I am not sure how to build a array with high sampling rates signal, like >1K. (Sigle-point data)
Before, I would like to use "Build Arrary" and "Shift Register" to build a arrary, but I found it is not working for high sampling rates.
Is there anyother good way to build a data arrary for high sampling rates??
Thanks
Attachments:
Building_Array_high_rates.JPG ‏120 KB

Can't give a sample of the FPGA right now but here is a sample bit of RT code I recently used. I am acquiring data at 51,200 samples every second. I put the data in a FIFO on the FPGA side, then I read from that FIFO on the RT side and insert the data into a pre-initialized array using "Replace Array subset" NOT "Insert into array". I keep a count of the data I have read/inserted, and once I am at 51,200 samples, I know I have 1 full second of data. At this point, I add it to a queue which sends it to another loop to be processed. Also, I don't use the new index terminal in my subVI because I know I am always adding 6400 elements so I can just multiply my counter by 6400, but if you use the method described further down below , you will want to use the "new index" to return a value because you may not always read the same number of elements using that method.
The reason I use a timeout of 0 and a wait until next ms multiple is because if you use a timeout wired to the FIFO read node, it spins a loop in the background that polls for data, which rails your processor. Depending on what type of acquisition you are doing, you can also use the method of reading 0 elements, then using the "elements remaining" variable, to wire up another node as is shown below. This was not an option for me because of my programs architecture and needing chunks of 1 second data. Had I used this method it would have overcomplicated things if I read more elements then I had available in my 51,200 buffer.
Let me knwo if you have more qeustions
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013
Attachments:
RT.PNG ‏36 KB
FIFO read.PNG ‏4 KB

How can I improve the speed of my VI to work in real-time at higher sample rates?

I am currently trying to implement a multi-channel control system, the vi of which is attached. It effectively consists of a number of additions and multiplications in the processing subvi (also attached), however, for 7 inputs and 7 outputs I cannot get it to work at sample rates higher than 3kHz without experiencing an overwrite error. Does anyone have any tips as to how I can get the processing to work more efficiently such that I can get it to work at higher sample rates?
Attachments:
Simul_AIAO_Buffer(Two_Boards)_control_FXLMS_for_1_leaky_no_SCXI.vi ‏128 KB
FXLMSsub_leak_v2.vi ‏70 KB
filtered_ref_1_chan.vi ‏39 KB

Hi mattwilko,
I believe the first issue that you should address is the building of arrays.
This is mainly happening on the edge of your loops.
This is my reasoning.
Allocating memory in RT to handle an array that is growing will blow away your determinism.
I would suggets pre-allocating all of your storage and work with the data in-place.
In LV 7.1 there are some great new tools that will help nail down issue of this type.
If you have LV 7.1 you may want to upgrade so you can take advantage of the new tools.
Trying to help,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Need to Import Audio Books at higher sample rates in iTunes 8

Folks,
In iTunes 7, I could import audio books at 32k mono and they would sound good (after all, it's just someone reading - doesn't need stereo or high sample rate). However, in iTunes 8, for 32k the sound crackles and is distorted. Quality is OK at 64k mono but obviously now the files are twice as big. Am I right in slating the blame to iTunes 8? Is there some way I can use iTunes 7 encoding?

I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't try it. To get a non-crackled 32kb mono AAC you have to:
- Select the AAC Encoder's "Custom..." from the drop-down
- Change the (stereo) bit rate to 64kbps
- Leave sample rate on auto
- Change channels to mono
- (And most importantly) keep the "optimize for voice" box UNchecked
I tested it several times with different audiobook CDs and settings and it seems that the voice optimization causes mono tracks of any bit rate to be garbled and crackle. Hope that helps!
(And I'm pretty sure OS 10.5.6 is out. Check your Software Update under the Apple menu.)

Is it possible to detect low frequency signals with a high sampling rate?

Hello everyone,
I'm having an issue detecting low frequency signals with a high sampling rate. Shouldn't I be able to detect the frequencies as long as the sampling rate is at least 2 times the highest frequency I will measure? The frequency range I am measuring is 5-25 Hz, and I use Extract Single Tone.vi to measure the frequency. The sampling setting I am using is 2 samples at 10 kHz. Is there a method I can use to make this work?
Attached is the vi.
Attachments:
frequencytest.vi ‏21 KB

You are sampling at 10Ks/S, but only taking two samples. What do you expect to see? If your signals are binary (On or Off) you would only see either an on or an off, or if the rise/fall time was fast and you were Extremely lucky, one of each. If you want to see a waveform you have to sample for at least the period of a waveform. So you should take samples for at least 0.2 seconds to capture an entire waveform at 5Hz, ideally longer. Think of looking at a tide change at a dock. If you want to see the entire tide change you will probably have to measure repeatedly over 24 hours, not just run out on the dock, measure the height twice and leave. That wouldn't tell you anything other than at that precise moment the tide height was X, but not that it was at high tide, low tide, in between, etc.
I type too slowly, I see that a more technical answer has been given, so mine will be the philosophical one!
Putnam
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Senior Test Engineer
Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
LabVIEW Champion

High sample rate data acquisition using DAQ and saving data continuously. Also I would like to chunck data into a new file in every 32M

Hi:
I am very new to LabView, so I need some help to come up with an idea that can help me save data continuously in real time. Also I don't want the file to be too big, so I would like to crete a new file in every 32 mega bytes, and clear the previous buffer. Now I have this code can save voltage data to TDMS file, and the sample rate is 2m Hz, so the volume of data increase very fast, and my computer only have 2G ram, so the computer will freeze after 10 seconds I start to collect data. I need some advise from you briliant people.
Thanks very much I really appreciate that.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
hispeedisplayandstorage.vi ‏33 KB

I am a huge proponent of the Producer/Consumer architecture. But this is the place I advise against it. The DAQmx Configure Logging does all of it for you!
Note: You will want to use a Chart instead of a graph here.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Attachments:
hispeedisplayandstorage_BD.png ‏36 KB

Can I mix down to 32 bit at a higher sample rate than 44.1 kHz ?

When I use Ableton Live, it lets me choose 16, 24, or 32 bit, and then I can choose a sample rate all the way up to 192000. Is this possible in Audition ? I have been going through all the preferences and all the tabs and I can't find this option. All I find is a convert option, or the adjust option. But that's not what I want. I want to mix down this way.
The closest thing I found is when I go to "Export Audio Mix Down", I can select 32 bit. Then there is a box for sample rate, with all the different values. But it won't allow me to change it from 44100.

JimMcMahon85 wrote:
Can someone explain this process in laymens terms:
http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/ozone/OzoneDitheringGuide.pdf ---> specifically Section: VIII "Don't believe the hype"
I don't read graphs well, can someone put in laymens terms how to do this test, step by step, and where do i get a pure sinewave to import into audition in the first place??
UNbelievable: So I have to first run visual tests using a sinewave to make sure dither is working properly, then do listening tests with different types of dither to hear which I like best on my source material, and then for different source material it's best to use different types of dither techniques???... Am I getting this right???...
Hmm... you only need to run tests and do all that crap if you are completely paranoid. Visual tests prove nothing in terms of what you want to put on a CD - unless it's test tones, of course. For the vast majority of use, any form of dither at all is so much better than no dither that it simply doesn't matter. At the extreme risk of upsetting the vast majority of users, I'd say that dither is more critical if you are reproducing wide dynamic range acoustic material than anything produced synthetically in a studio - simply because the extremely compressed nature of most commercial music means that even the reverb tails drop off into noise before you get to the dither level. And that's one of the main points really - if the noise floor of your recording is at, say, -80dB then you simply won't be hearing the effects of dither, whatever form it takes - because that noise is doing the dithering for you. So you'd only ever hear the effect of LSB dither (what MBIT+, etc. does) when you do a fade to the 16-bit absolute zero at the end of your track.
Second point: you cannot dither a 32-bit Floating Point recording, under any circumstances at all. You can only dither a recording if it's stored in an integer-based format - like the 16-bit files that go on a CD. Technically then, you can dither a 24-bit recording - although there wouldn't be any point, because the dither would be at a level which was impossible to reproduce on real-world electronics - which would promptly swamp the entire effect you were listening for with its own noise anyway. Bottom line - the only signals you need to dither are the 16-bit ones on the file you use for creating CD copies. And you should only dither once - hence the seemingly strange instructions in the Ozone guide about turning off the Audition dither when you save the converted copy. The basic idea is that you apply the dither to the 32-bit file during the truncation process - and that's dithered the file (albeit 'virtually') just the once. Now if you do the final file conversion in Audition, you need to make sure the dithering is turned off during the process, otherwise all the good work that Ozone did is undone. What you need to do is to transfer the Ozone dithering at the 16-bit level directly to a 16-bit file proper, without anything else interfering with it at all. So what you do with Ozone is to do the dithering to your master file, and save that as something else - don't leave the master file like that at all. After saving it, undo the changes to the original, in fact - otherwise it's effectively not a file you could use to generate a master with a greater-than-16-bit depth from any more, because it will all have been truncated. Small point, but easy to overlook!
just what's the easiest way to test if a simple dithering setting is
working for 32-bit down to 16-bit in Audition?... Why is there no info
about dithering from 32 bit to 16 bit (which is better then dithering
from 24-bit isn't it)?
I hope that the answers to at least some of this are clearer now, but just to reiterate: The easiest way to test if its working is to burn a CD with your material on it, and at the end of a track, turn the volume right up. If it fades away smoothly to absolute zero on a system with lower noise than the CD produces then the dither has worked. If you hear a strange sort-of 'crunchy' noise at the final point, then it hasn't. There is info about the 32 to 16-bit dithering process in the Ozone manual, but you probably didn't understand it, and the reason that there's nothing worth talking about in the Audition manual is because it's pretty useless. Earlier versions of it were better, but Adobe didn't seem to like that too much, so it's been systematically denuded of useful information over the releases. Don't ask me why; I don't know what the official answer to the manual situation is at all, except that manuals are expensive to print, and have also to be compatible with the file format for the help files - which are essentially identical to it.
Part of the answer will undoubtedly be that Audition is a 'professional' product, and that 'professionals' should know all this stuff already, therefore the manual only really has to be a list of available functions, and not how to use them. I don't like that approach very much - there's no baseline definition of what a 'professional' should know (or even how they should behave...), and it's an unrealistic view of the people that use Audition anyway. Many of them would regard themselves as professional journalists, or whatever, but they still have to use the software, despite knowing very little about it technically. For these people, and probably a lot of others, the manual sucks big time.
It's all about educating people in the end - and as you are in the process of discovering, all education causes brain damage - otherwise it hasn't worked.

High sampling rate is not accurate

Dear alls,
Any one know why the time loop is not accurate at defined period at the RealTime Trace Viewer ? In figure of VI, I set the period for the time loop is 250 us, but when I analyze in Real time Trace Viewer, it shows the real period time about 676 us. That means my data acquisition will be sampled in wrong sampling rate.
Could you give me some explane, please? And how can I solve this problem? I tested this code with MyRIO board.
Best Regards,
Kien

crossrulz wrote:
Why do you have a wait in your timed loop? The point of the Timed Loop is to state the loop rate.
??? Bigger problems than that! Why do you have any timing other that the TASK timing? And really, The task timing is most likely the loop rate.
Can you post your actual VI? I suspect something else is happening here that we cannot see (configurations, channels used, etc).
And a snip of the Task needs posting

Tape synchronization at high sample rates + recording at 192 Khz 24 bit

I was expecting at least that Apple would fix Emagix synchronization problem that occurs when Logic is slave to a tape recorder at sample rate other than 44.1 or 48Khz.
Further more I do get click , pops and digital noise when I try to master @ 192Khz 24 bit most of the time (not synchronized to any code).
For archiving tapes or going back and forth to tape I use Digi 002 , Rosentahl WIF (SMPTE to MTC) and Pro tools , as Logic is incapable for such a task , and for mastering and mix-down I use Lynx AES 16 with dCS904 AD and dCS954 DA with LogicPro.

Dear Mr. Logic 8 on Mac Intel.
I would like to thank you for you suggestions but :
1] The quality of LTC on my Otari 2inch/24Track is OK.
2] The LTC to MTC interface that I use with Logic 8 is Unitor 8 MK II.
3] My AD/DA convertors are considered to be la creme de la creme and I am pretty sure that they are OK.
4] The HD is an external la cie and has to be fast as I can bounce 8 tracks @ 96 Khz-24Bit using Pro Tools LE synchronized to tape.
5] The software is up to date and trust me Logic had serious sync issues several versions ago.
6] I checked and double checked even multichecked the prefs and settings of Logic .
It is interesting that Logic 8 locks @ 44.1/48 Khz but crashes @ any other rate.
I wonder if the guys of C-Lab (that left Emagic ages ago) are the responsible ones for the synch code and if so I wonder if they could help Apple with the synchronization.
Thank you again for even bothering to answer.
Any help would be welcome.

Can we place Analog in Read(AI-READ) Vi inside the while loop for high sample rate like 22ks/s?

I am using E-series Card for data acquisition.My requirement is to sample the channel, and check the 10 samples for certain condition.both at a time.What should be done can we place the AI-READ vi inside for or while loop for this purpose?

Hello,
Yes, you can include the AI Read.vi inside the while loop, you would just need to specify the number of scans to read for every iteration of the loop. Then, after AI Read.vi has read the data, you can do what ever kind of manipulation of the data you would like, before the next iteration of the loop. The one thing to watch out for is what ever manipulation of the data you do, be sure that it doesn't take to long whereas the buffer holding the data starts to back up. That can be checked by looking at the scan backlog output of the AI Read.vi, which will tell you how many scans have been acquired but haven't been read into your program.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Steven B.
Applications Engineering, NI

Timebase data for high sample rate

Hi.
I am running a Labview program which is sampling data from a strain gauge module in a CDAQ unit at 2kHz.
The data is being logged to a TDMS file. The porblem I am having is finding a clock that is quick enough to use as a time base for this data. The clock that I am currently using is too slow and I see repeated time data for a few rows in the data file.
See attached picture.
So basically I need the clock data that can update at least 2000 times a second.
Thankyou in advance.
Rhys.

As I already said, the internal timebase is more than capable so if you are reading multiple samples and specifying the internal clock, you should not have any problems. I don't know if your problem is how you are recording the data or reading it but the samples should be .5ms apart.

Lock in Amplifier with high sampling rates on non DSA hardware

Hi,
I plan to use the NI lock-in amplifier startup kit to detect a harmonic signal of around 400kHz. I plan to use the digitizer PCI-5105 ( I have not purchased it till now, but I will soon). I have downloaded the lock-in start up kit and unzipped the folders and was hoping to give it a trial run with a NI USB-6363 however the vi does not open because it says there are a lot of subvi's missing (subvi's like AI read.vi, AI clear.vi, etc.). Also the LockinDemo.vi seems to use NI 4472 as a default hardware. My questions are 1) Can the NI lock-in-amplifier startup kit be used with PCI-5105 and 2) can the missing vi's be downloaded from somewhere or be replaced with other blocks on my own?
Thanks in advance for any help
Avishek
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Dear All
I have plotted waveform graph frequency vs amplitude of real time signal. I am using measurement computing USB1208FS. I used fft.vi to plot the graph and get the waveform which is attached. On X-axis frequency is form 0 to 0.49HZ. But I want to increase that from 50 to 500 hz. When X-axis scale is in auto select mode then it automatically adjust to 0 to 0.499 hz. When I deselect autoselect mode and edit x-axis from 50hz to 500hz then no waveform comes on display. I have set the sapling rate of 1024 and count of 500. Please guide me how can i get the desired waveform graph.
The waveform which i plot is shown in attch1 and my desired waveform is shown in attach2.
waiting for response
Kind Regards
Urfee
Attachments:
result that i got.JPG ‏17 KB
desired values for scales.JPG ‏35 KB

Audigy 4 pro vs. cubase sx sample rate - fight to the de

helloI recently bought an audigy 4 pro soundcard, heard it was probably the best for home recording etc.
I have encountered some problems... I have a load of backing tracks stored in cubase sx 2.2, but now when i open them up it shows the message "sample rate could not be set. This may be due to the sample clock being set to external sync."The files now run at 48kHz instead of 44.kHz, making them jittery, out of time, or chipmonk like. I've read through various messages around similar problems, i've tried everything & nothing has worked...in cubase - project/project set up/sample rate = 48kHz and can not be changed.
in cubase - device set up/vst multitrack/asio driver = creative asio + clock source = internalit only offers 5 asio drivers, asio direct x full duplex, asio mulitmedia, creative asio, SB audigy4 asio 24/96 [a400] and SB audigy4asio [a400] i do not get the offer of asio4all.While i have also tried going through the control panel...controlpanel/audio control panel/device settings/digital out samplerate and setting it to 44.kHz this doesn't seem to change anything. I have no problem with recording new songs at a higher sample rate, but has audigy 4 pro rendered all my old songs useless?please help!!!!!!!!

Doogs wrote:
helloI recently bought an audigy 4 pro soundcard, heard it was probably the best for home recording etc. I have encountered some problems... I have a load of backing tracks stored in cubase sx 2.2, but now when i open them up it shows the message "sample rate could not be set. This may be due to the sample clock being set to external sync."The files now run at 48kHz instead of 44.kHz, making them jittery, out of time, or chipmonk like. I've read through various messages around similar problems, i've tried everything & nothing has worked...in cubase - project/project set up/sample rate = 48kHz and can not be changed.in cubase - device set up/vst multitrack/asio driver = creative asio + clock source = internalit only offers 5 asio drivers, asio direct x full duplex, asio mulitmedia, creative asio, SB audigy4 asio 24/96 [a400] and SB audigy4asio [a400] i do not get the offer of asio4all.While i have also tried going through the control panel...controlpanel/audio control panel/device settings/digital out samplerate and setting it to 44.kHz this doesn't seem to change anything. I have no problem with recording new songs at a higher sample rate, but has audigy 4 pro rendered all my old songs useless?please help!!!!!!!!
If you RTFM, you'll find out, Audigy 4 is locked into 6-bit/48kHz and 24-bit/96kHz resolutions when ASIO driver is in use.
I suppose, you still can (if not saved @ 48kHz) load your projects into SX @ 44. kHz, by selecting MME drivers instead of any ASIO.
Perhaps installing Asio4All gets it popped into that list you have there.
There are also tools to convert from 48-->44., but the source has to be as wave format.
Here is one freeware SRC tool @ http://www.voxengo.com/product/r8brain/.
.jtp

Diadem sampling rate

Hello!
We are using Diadem Version 11.0 and the hardware cDAQ with the voltage measurement hardware NI9229/9239.
I am trying to sample the voltage by at least 4khz, but I always get an error message that says that this rate isn't supplied by the hardware (the handbook says different things). I also changed in the options from windows timing to software timing or automatic timing, and also from hardware to software timing. Didn't work out. How can I maybe change the resolution to get a higher sampling rate?
Please help me , thank you very much in advance

Hi Lorenzo!
The problem is the NI 9229/9239 cannot sample at 4KS/s. If you check the NI 9229/9239 data sheet , it is said in the fist page you must use a sampling rate (Fs)= (50KS/s) / n; where n=1, 2, 3... 31; so it is not posible to sample at 4KS/s.
You can use sample rate (Fs)= 4,166 KS/s (using n=12); or you can use sample rate (Fs)= 3,846 KS/s (using n=13) but not Fs=4kS/s

Recording LP records as source material- Sample Rate

Using recorded tracks from LP records to make DVDs, Blu-Ray DVDs or simple CD's. Am not sure what maximum sample rate to use. I understand the end product limits of the various digital media, but LPs are analog. Do I gain any sound quality by recording the original LP at a sample rate higher than 48000/32bit, say 96000 sample rate) and then resampling (downsizing) the audio file if the end product cannot produce the higher sample rate?

Conversion de LP -Archivos Digitales
Se recomienda Grabalos con estas velocidad de Muestreo
Blue-Ray 96000Hrz. / 32 bits
DVD & 48000 Hrz. /32 Bits
CD DE AUDIO A 44100Hrz /32 Bits ó 24Bits
Te recomendaria Cambiarte a Adobe Audition
Saludos
http://soundcloud.com/creativoxpro/restaurando-audio-de-un-vinil
Para audio
8000 muestras/s
Teléfonos, adecuado para la voz humana pero no para la reproducción musical. En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 3,5 kHz.
22050 muestras/s
Radio En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 10 kHz.
32000 muestras/s
Vídeo digital en formato miniDV.
44100 muestras/s
CD, En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 20 kHz. También común en audio en formatos MPEG-1 (VCD,SVCD, MP3).
47250 muestras/s
Formato PCM de Nippon Columbia (Denon). En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 22 kHz.
48000 muestras/s
Sonido digital utilizado en la televisión digital, DVD, formato de películas, audio profesional y sistemas DAT.
50000 muestras/s
Primeros sistemas de grabación de audio digital de finales de los 70de las empresas 3M y Soundstream.
96000 ó 192400 muestras/s
HD DVD, audio de alta definición para DVD y BD-ROM (Blu-ray Disc).
2 822 400 muestras/s
SACD, Direct Stream Digital, desarrollado por Sony y Philips.
Para vídeo
50 Hz
Vídeo PAL.
60 Hz
Vídeo NTSC.
*informacion extraida para apoyo de la pregunta en el foro // http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frecuencia_de_muestreo
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_rate

Higher Sampling rate... in logig

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for