Ho do I enahance Tuning and "Limit to Key" in Logic 8 like in Garageband?

I use enhance Tuning and "Limit to Key" in Garageband to make that synthetic vocal sound that locks the vocals on key like they do in todays Hip Hop and dance music, but the big question is...
how is that done in Logic 8?

With the Pitch correction plugin from Logic's "pitch" folder. With a bit of tweaking/abusing the plugin you should get what you want.

Similar Messages

Hi All, I just installed PS CC 2014 and Deleted PS CS6. I have a HUGE problem! The Liquify Filter on PS CC 2014 is not working. When the filter comes up, my photo is reduced to two color fields - bright turquoise and lime green! Can anyone help me? I

Hi Everyone,
I just deleted PS CS6 and installed PS CC 2014. I'm trying to use the Liquify Filter and it does not work. When I click on the Liquify Filter, my photo does not appear properly. The photo appears as two flourescent color fields - bright turquoise and lime green! Can anyone help me with this? Also, does anyone know if I can re-install Photoshop CS6?
Thanks!
Laraine

Hi Everyone....I figured it out. Strangely, although I had NEVER used Liquify in PS CC 2014....I just realized that in Liquify Advanced Mode that the "SHOW MASK" option was on by default! I unchecked SHOW MASK. Everything is OK. Whew! Tks!

Invoice not updated for Service and limit items

Hi All,
For service and limit we are not able to see the invoice document in the "Related Documents" tab in the Purchase order.
For material I am able to find the entry in the tab but the invoice statistics data is not getting updated for service POu2019s and also for limit item POu2019s.
Found a note for the same : 1462644 - Empty statistics in PO in case of Extended Classic Scenario but it works only for material line items only.
Please let me know if any config change need to be made else if there is any SAP note that would resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Catherine

A knowledge based article note was applied to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Catherine

SQL Tuning and OPTIMIZER - Execution Time with " AND col .."

Hi all,
I get a question about SQL Tuning and OPTIMIZER.
There are three samples with EXPLAIN PLAN and execution time.
This "tw_pkg.getMaxAktion" is a PLSQL Package.
1.) Execution Time : 0.25 Second
2.) Execution Time : 0.59 Second
3.) Execution Time : 1.11 Second
The only difference is some additional "AND col <> .."
Why is this execution time growing so strong?
Many Thanks,
Thomas
----[First example]---
Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0
Connected as dbadmin2
SQL>
SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
2 SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
3                    FROM studie
4                 ) max_aktion
5 WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900 ;
Explained
SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3201460684
| Id | Operation            | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |   220 |   880 |     5 (40)| 00:00:
|* 1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |   220 |   880 |     5 (40)| 00:00:
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900)
13 rows selected
SQL>
Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 0.25 seconds
----[/First]---
----[Second example]---
Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0
Connected as dbadmin2
SQL>
SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
2 SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
3                    FROM studie
4                 ) max_aktion
5 WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
6    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 692;
Explained
SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3201460684
| Id | Operation            | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |    11 |    44 |     6 (50)| 00:00:
|* 1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |    11 |    44 |     6 (50)| 00:00:
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900 AND
              "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>692)
14 rows selected
SQL>
Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 0.59 seconds
----[/Second]---
----[Third example]---
SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
2 SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
3                    FROM studie
4                 ) max_aktion
5 WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
6    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 692
7    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 392;
Explained
SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3201460684
| Id | Operation            | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |     1 |     4 |     6 (50)| 00:00:
|* 1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |     1 |     4 |     6 (50)| 00:00:
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900 AND
              "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>692 AND
              "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>392)
15 rows selected
SQL>
Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 1.11 seconds
----[/Third]---Edited by: thomas_w on Jul 9, 2010 11:35 AM
Edited by: thomas_w on Jul 12, 2010 8:29 AM

Hi,
this is likely because SQL Developer fetches and displays only limited number of rows from query results.
This number is a parameter called 'sql array fetch size', you can find it in SQL Developer preferences under Tools/Preferences/Database/Advanced tab, and it's default value is 50 rows.
Query scans a table from the beginning and continue scanning until first 50 rows are selected.
If query conditions are more selective, then more table rows (or index entries) must be scanned to fetch first 50 results and execution time grows.
This effect is usually unnoticeable when query uses simple and fast built-in comparison operators (like = <> etc) or oracle built-in functions, but your query uses a PL/SQL function that is much more slower than built-in functions/operators.
Try to change this parameter to 1000 and most likely you will see that execution time of all 3 queries will be similar.
Look at this simple test to figure out how it works:
CREATE TABLE studie AS
SELECT row_number() OVER (ORDER BY object_id) studie_id, o.*
FROM (
SELECT * FROM all_objects
CROSS JOIN
(SELECT 1 FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 100)
) o;
CREATE INDEX studie_ix ON studie(object_name, studie_id);
ANALYZE TABLE studie COMPUTE STATISTICS;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION very_slow_function(action IN NUMBER)
RETURN NUMBER
IS
BEGIN
RETURN action;
END;
/'SQL array fetch size' parameter in SQLDeveloper has been set to 50 (default). We will run 3 different queries on test table.
Query 1:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      1.22       1.29          0       1310          0          50
total        3      1.22       1.29          0       1310          0          50
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
     50 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=1310 pr=0 pw=0 time=355838 us cost=5536 size=827075 card=165415)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
     50   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 2:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
      AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id > 800
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.01          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      8.40       8.62          0       9351          0          50
total        3      8.40       8.64          0       9351          0          50
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
     50 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=9351 pr=0 pw=0 time=16988202 us cost=5552 size=41355 card=8271)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
     50   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 3:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id = 600
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.01       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1     18.72      19.16          0      19315          0           1
total        3     18.73      19.16          0      19315          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5536 size=165415 card=33083)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      1   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 1 - 1,29 sec, 50 rows fetched, 1310 index entries scanned to find these 50 rows.
Query 2 - 8,64 sec, 50 rows fetched, 9351 index entries scanned to find these 50 rows.
Query 3 - 19,16 sec, only 1 row fetched, 19315 index entries scanned (full index).
Now 'SQL array fetch size' parameter in SQLDeveloper has been set to 1000.
Query 1:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1     18.35      18.46          0      19315          0         899
total        3     18.35      18.46          0      19315          0         899
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
    899 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=20571272 us cost=5536 size=827075 card=165415)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
    899   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 2:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
      AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id > 800
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1     18.79      18.86          0      19315          0          99
total        3     18.79      18.86          0      19315          0          99
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
     99 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=32805696 us cost=5552 size=41355 card=8271)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
     99   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 3:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                     FROM studie
              ) max_aktion
WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id = 600
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1     18.69      18.84          0      19315          0           1
total        3     18.69      18.84          0      19315          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 93 (TEST)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5536 size=165415 card=33083)(object id 79865)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      1   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)And now:
Query 1 - 18.46 sec, 899 rows fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.
Query 2 - 18.86 sec, 99 rows fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.
Query 3 - 18.84 sec, 1 row fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.

Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux AS for Oracle9i Database

I put together a step-by-step guide for tuning and optimizing Red Hat Linux Advanced Server for Oracle9i. It's my first draft version and I would appreciate any comments and feedback.
The article
"Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux Advanced Server for Oracle9i Database"
can be found at:
http://www.puschitz.com/TuningLinuxForOracle.shtml
The article
"Oracle 9i Installation on Red Hat Linux 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, and on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1"
can now be found at http://www.puschitz.com/InstallingOracle9i.shtml
And both links for
"Oracle on Red Hat Linux"
can be found at
http://www.puschitz.com/OracleOnLinux.shtml
Werner

Is this good for Redhat Linux 9.0 and not just the advanced server.
If it is not could you please provide me the links to articles like,
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i Database"
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i App Server"
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i Infrastucture"
Thanks.

A process for the performance monitoring, tuning and fixing issues

Hello
Any recommendations for 10g a process/procedure/methodology for the performance monitoring, tuning and fixing issues for a team to follow ?

Ranker wrote:
Hello
Any recommendations for 10g a process/procedure/methodology for the performance monitoring, tuning and fixing issues for a team to follow ?1) upgrade the DB to a supported version.
2) Read The Fine Manual; Performance Tuning Guide
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10822/toc.htm
Handle:     Ranker
Status Level:     Newbie
Registered:     May 12, 2013
Total Posts:     13
Total Questions:     4 (4 unresolved)
How sad!
why do you never get your questions answered here?

Does anyone know how or if even possible to block stations and limit content on iTunes Radio?

Does anyone know how or if even possible to block stations and limit content on iTunes Radio? I have younger children listening to inappropriate music. I have the iPad locked down but that doesn't seem to help.

Thank you for your response! I just don't want to spend more time on beautifying the libsyn page via hours of dumpster diving for code hence reaching out on here about iWeb (even if it's sadly been put out to pasture). This was the response that I got from Libsyn about this:
Hello,
Thanks for contacting us. Just to clarify, our system's blog page templates are basic 'starting points' -- we're working now to improve our basic blog page templates to make more options available to Libsyn users.
You might be able to use your Libsyn show's RSS feed to generate content on an iWeb page. You could do a Google search for 'convert RSS to HTML' to learn more. Here's a link for more info about generating HTML content from an RSS feed source:
http://www.blogtips.org/free-rss-tools/
We appreciate your feedback and suggestions. Please let us know if you have any questions.
Any thoughts? Btw, if it possible to 'view source code' for an iWeb page that's created or to take html code and plaster it into an iWeb page? If that's possible then I might be able to use iWeb for Libsyn.

Offset and Limit for sql queries

Hello all,
Can anybody help me please...
i have used the offset and limit in postgres sql when we want to get only a number of rows starting from a particular row of a table. is there any similar things available in oracle.
Hope some one can help me soon...
Thanks and regards,
sreejesh Rajan,

use the following query to get records from 10th row to 14th row
select * from scott.emp where rownum < 15
minus
select * from scott.emp where rownum < 10

Bt hub 4 does the hub reserve and limit the amoun...

quick question....when connecting multiple computers to the hub(1 wired,3 wireless),does the hub reserve and limit the amount of bandwidth to each computer??
thanks
karl

There is no bandwidth control, but Ethernet connections tend to get priority.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

How to measure and limit the data volume?

Morning.
I need a tool to measure and limit the data volume of internet usage. My internet tariff allows a maximum of 5 GB data volume per month. Exceeds my usage that amount the bandwidth will reduce to only 64 kB/s or the exceeding data volume must be paid extraordinarily expensive.
Do you know a tool that measures the data volume in a given time period and can alert or limit the internet connection for instance if the data volume at the half of the months has exceeded more than the half of the data volume for the entire month?
Kind regards, vatolin

You could generate large amount of data and then use any SNMP Viewer (BMC Dahsboard, Solarwinds, Nagios, CiscoWorks etc.) to see the throughput of the interfaces at peak. But why bother? Cisco has been commented by numerous research firms (Gartner etc.) to be very precise about their stated throughputs.
Regards
Farrukh

I can not buy apps in the appstore. have to put secret questions and answers at the end and limit session appears. what to do?

I can not buy apps in the appstore. have to put secret questions and answers at the end and limit session appears. what to do?

Same here , i tried at least 50 times limit session every time

Cannot call "mask and limit testing" inside a loop

Calling "mask and limit testing" in a loop doesn't work. The problem
is that the Upper Limit and Lower Limit are initialized only the first
time the VI is called. All waveforms are tested against the same
limits even if different limits are passed at each iteration. Is there
a way to use this VI in a loop?
Thanks!
Martin
Attachments:
test_limits_testing.vi ‏193 KB

Dear Martin,
Thank you for contacting National Instruments. I would like to apologize for the delay in responding to your support request.
From the information you have provided, it sounds like you are running your VI and experiences issues with the lower and upper mask refreshing after subsequent iterations of the FOR loop.
The �Mask and Limit Testing� Express VI is not intended to function inside a loop; however, you can fortunately modify this Express VI to perform the desired action. To do so, please follow these instructions:
1) Open the Block Diagram for your �test_limits_testing.vi� file
2) [Right Click] on the �Mask and Limits Testing.vi� Express VI
a. Select [Open Front Panel]
b. When prompted to convert to a standart subVI, choose [Convert]
3)
[Right Click] on the �subMaskLimitTesting.vi� Express VI
a. Select [Open Front Panel]
4) From the toolbar, select [Window] >> [Show Block Diagram]
5) You should see two subVI�s named �MatchDT� (white icons with black text)
a. Wire a [True] Constant to the �Reset 2� input terminal for each of the �MatchDT� subVI�s
i. To do this, right click each input terminal and select [Create]>>[Constant]
ii. Make sure the constant value is set to [T] for �true�
6) Save and Close the subVI�s
7) Re-run your �test_limits_testing.vi� file, and the masking limits should re-initialize upon each loop iteration
You have successfully customized the VI to function within a loop.
I hope this helps! Please don�t hesitate to let me know if there�s anything else I can help with or clarify. Have a great day!
Kind Regards,
Joe Des Rosier
National Instruments

Mask and Limit Testing Express VI

Hello.
Im a bit new at looking at limit testing signals. Im using the Mask and Limit Testing Express VI to mask a signal I acquired previously. See attached VI.
My problem is that we would like to load the limit mask at run time using a file of some sort.
At the moment I am un-able to get any sort of mask loaded using the limit inputs to the Mask and Limit Testing Express VI. Does anybody know how I might do this?
Thanks in advance
Chuck
Attachments:
Limit Test (SubVI) example.vi ‏724 KB
Limit Type.ctl ‏5 KB

Hi and thanks for getting back so soon
True the upper and lower inputs are not connected because I wanted to show a working (all be it without an external mask) VI
the problem is I can't get the upper and lower inputs working in any form If I connect the inputs. So I guess my question should be,
How do I wire the upper and lower inputs to produce a working mask with the data supplied?
Then how do I use a file to provide the mask data.
Sorry for my lack of clarity and I hope this helps.
Chuck

Mask and limit testing

Hello,
When i am trying to use the Mask and Limit testing I am getting " Unable to View Properties" could you please tell me what will be issue on this.
Thanks
KJD
Attachments:
Mask and limit testing.png ‏56 KB
Mask and limit testing.png ‏56 KB

I would say off hand that the express VI is corrupted.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

When will Hub automatically select fewer than 2500 segments for tuning and/or testing?

I have two systems (FR/IT) with 64K+ total segments uploaded.
When I specify "Auto" for tuning and testing, the system only extracts 500 (or some other number < 2500) tuning and testing segments from the TMX files that I uploaded. On visual inspection of the subsequently downloaded training, tuning,
and test corpora, I see nothing unusual: alignment is OK, repeated and partial segments are not very frequent, etc.
Similar content extracted in the same way from the same WorldServer db for other languages (PE, ES, NL, ID) works fine.
When will Hub automatically select fewer than 2500 segments for tuning and/or testing?
Thanks!

Hi Mike,
Here is how auto-selection of Testing and Tuning data works in the Hub.
1. If a segment in tuning data is identical to a segment in training data, the segment is removed from training data.
2. If a segment in tuning data is identical to a segment in testing data, the segment is removed from testing data.
3. If a segment in tuning data and testing data is identical to a segment in training data, the segment is removed from training and testing data.
4. If a segment in testing data is identical to a segment in training data, the segment is removed from training data.
Hub auto selects 2500 sentences and the data under goes above adjustments. As a result you will see fewer than 2500 sentences.
Additional details can be found in hub user guide:https://hub.microsofttranslator.com/Help/Download/Microsoft%20Translator%20Hub%20User%20Guide.pdf
Please let us know if you need any additional information.
Thank you

Ho do I enahance Tuning and "Limit to Key" in Logic 8 like in Garageband?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for