How to know child procedure Execution time with in parent procedure

Hi Team,
I've a requirement in which I need to get the execution time of a child procedure while its running in a parent procedure in PLSQL. While the child process is running, I want to know its execution time so that if it execution time exceeds more than 5 seconds than I want to through an error. Please let me know by what means this can be achieved in plsql.
Regards,
Tech D.

TechD wrote:
Hi Team,
I've a requirement in which I need to get the execution time of a child procedure while its running in a parent procedure in PLSQL. While the child process is running, I want to know its execution time so that if it execution time exceeds more than 5 seconds than I want to through an error. Please let me know by what means this can be achieved in plsql.
Regards,
Tech D.PL/SQL is NOT a Real Time programming language.
The procedure that invokes the child procedure is effectively dormant while the child runs.
Plus there is no easy way to know when 5 seconds has elapsed.

Similar Messages

  • How to know the query execution time

    Hi All,
    I want to know the execution time taken for a particular query, How should i get that information ?
    say for example,
    select * from emp
    after getting the result, i want to know the time taken for completing the execution.
    How ?
    Inputs are welcome !

    BTW it was already written in a response to you yestreday:
    Re: Query Plan
    Gints Plivna
    http://www.gplivna.eu

  • How to know exact query execution time.

    Hi,
    I want to know what is exact query execution time which excludes network access, constructing results. Please suggest me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Satish.G

    Not sure I know what you really want, but if this is a testing phase sort of thing and you are running on unix, there is the time command.
    If you want something that is part of your application, you can run a timer in a separate Thread - for approximate time.
    If you want more precise time, you can use java.util.Date - it has a method getTime(), which you can use before processing and again after processing and subtract the former from the later.

  • How Can I reduce Query Execution time with use of filter

    Dear Experts,
    In a query execution is faster when there is no product filter and these products can be a list contaning mare than 300 items.
    I am using In operator for that filter.

    Maybe if you posted the quer[y][ies] we could get a better idea.

  • Is there a way to find out how long my child has been playing with my ipad

    Is there a way to find out how long my child has been playing with my ipad???  He has been getting up before me in the morning and in the evening he is super tired and I'm wondering how early he has been getting up????

    No way to see exactly how long the iPad has been used but you may want to consider using parental controls.
    iOS: Understanding Restrictions (parental controls)

  • How to know all outgoing calls time?

    how to know all outgoing calls time?
    4S

    It all depends on your carrier whether incoming vs. outgoing times even matter.
    For example, here in the U.S., AT&T doesn't charge any differently whether a call is incoming or outgoing.  The carrier (AT&T) accepts a text code *646# to give you a summary of your call minutes, but they're divided into "Daytime", "Night and Weekend", and "Mobile to Mobile".  Those three types of minutes are billed differently here.

  • How to know whether ipod touch is with ios 5 or ios 4

    how to know whether ipod touch is with ios 5 or ios 4

    What do you mean is there any difference between iOS 4 and 5? There are tons of differences. Too many to cover here.
    I would definitely buy a 4G iPod Touch though as they will be the only generation that supports iOS 6 when it comes out this fall.
    B-rock

  • Need to know how to find the last execution time for a function module

    HI all
    I need to know
    1) How to find out the last execution time of the function module ?
      say for eg. I have executed a func. module at 1:39pm. How to retrieve this time  (1:39pm)
    2) I have created 3 billing document in tcode VF01 i.e 3 billing doucment no. would be created in SAP TABLE "VBRP" b/w 12am to 12:30 am.
    How to capture the latest SAP database update b/w time intervals?
    3) Suppose I am downloading TXT file using "GUI_DOWNLOAD" and say in 20th record some error has happened. I can capture the error using the exception.
    Is it possible to run the program once again from 21st records ? All this will be running in background...
    Kindly clarify....
    Points will be rewarded
    Thanks in advance

    1.Use tcode STAT input as Tcode of Fm and execute .
    2. See the billing documents are created in table VBRk header and there will always be Creation date and time.
    VBRk-Erdat "date ., u can check the time field also
    So now if u talk the date and time we can filter then display the records in intervals.
    3. with an error exeption how is my txt download finished .
    once exception is raised there will not be a download .
    regards,
    vijay

  • How to find out the execution time of a sql inside a function

    Hi All,
    I am writing one function. There is only one IN parameter. In that parameter, i will pass one SQL select statement. And I want the function to return the exact execution time of that SQL statement.
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION function_name (p_sql IN VARCHAR2)
    RETURN NUMBER
    IS
    exec_time NUMBER;
    BEGIN
    --Calculate the execution time for the incoming sql statement.
    RETURN exec_time;
    END function_name;
    /

    Please note that wrapping query in a "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (<query>)" doesn't necessarily reflect the execution time of the stand-alone query because the optimizer is smart and might choose a completely different execution plan for that query.
    A simple test case shows the potential difference of work performed by the database:
    Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Session altered.
    SQL>
    SQL> drop table count_test purge;
    Table dropped.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.17
    SQL>
    SQL> create table count_test as select * from all_objects;
    Table created.
    Elapsed: 00:00:02.56
    SQL>
    SQL> alter table count_test add constraint pk_count_test primary key (object_id)
    Table altered.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.04
    SQL>
    SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=>null, tabname=>'COUNT_TEST')
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.29
    SQL>
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL>
    SQL> select * from count_test;
    5326 rows selected.
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.10
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3690877688
    | Id  | Operation         | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |            |  5326 |   431K|    23   (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| COUNT_TEST |  5326 |   431K|    23   (5)| 00:00:01 |
    Statistics
              1  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
            419  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
         242637  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
           4285  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
            357  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
           5326  rows processed
    SQL>
    SQL> select count(*) from (select * from count_test);
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 572193338
    | Id  | Operation             | Name          | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |               |     1 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |               |     1 |            |          |
    |   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_COUNT_TEST |  5326 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Statistics
              1  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
             16  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
            412  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            380  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              1  rows processed
    SQL>As you can see the number of blocks processed (consistent gets) is quite different. You need to actually fetch all records, e.g. using a PL/SQL block on the server to find out how long it takes to process the query, but that's not that easy if you want to have an arbitrary query string as input.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle:
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • Reduce execution time with selects

    Hi,
    I have to reduce the execution time in a report, most of the consumed time is in the select query.
    I have a table, gt_result:
    DATA: BEGIN OF gwa_result,
          tknum            LIKE vttk-tknum,
          stabf            LIKE vttk-stabf,
          shtyp            LIKE vttk-shtyp,
          route            LIKE vttk-route,
          vsart            LIKE vttk-vsart,
          signi            LIKE vttk-signi,
          dtabf            LIKE vttk-dtabf,
          vbeln            LIKE likp-vbeln,
          /bshm/le_nr_cust LIKE likp-/bshm/le_nr_cust,
          vkorg            LIKE likp-vkorg,
          werks            LIKE likp-werks,
          regio            LIKE kna1-regio,
          land1            LIKE kna1-land1,
          xegld            LIKE t005-xegld,
          intca            LIKE t005-intca,
          bezei            LIKE tvrot-bezei,
          bezei1           LIKE t173t-bezei,
          fecha(10) type c.
    DATA: END OF gwa_result.
    DATA: gt_result LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF gwa_result.
    And the select query is this:
      SELECT ktknum kstabf kshtyp kroute kvsart ksigni
    k~dtabf
             lvbeln l/bshm/le_nr_cust lvkorg lwerks   nregio nland1 oxegld ointca
                 tbezei   ttbezei
      FROM vttk AS k
      INNER JOIN vttp  AS p ON ktknum = ptknum
      INNER JOIN likp  AS l ON pvbeln = lvbeln
      INNER JOIN kna1  AS n ON lkunnr = nkunnr
      INNER JOIN t005  AS o ON nland1 = oland1
      INNER JOIN tvrot AS t ON troute = kroute AND t~spras = sy-langu
      INNER JOIN t173t AS tt ON ttvsart = kvsart AND tt~spras = sy-langu
      INTO TABLE gt_result
      WHERE ktknum IN s_tknum AND ktplst IN s_tplst AND k~route IN s_route AND
         k~erdat BETWEEN s_erdat-low AND s_erdat-high AND
         l~/bshm/le_nr_cust <> ' '    "IS NOT NULL
         AND k~stabf = 'X'
         AND ktknum NOT IN ( SELECT tktknum  FROM vttk AS tk
                             INNER JOIN vttp AS tp ON tktknum = tptknum
                             INNER JOIN likp AS tl ON tpvbeln = tlvbeln
                             WHERE l~/bshm/le_nr_cust IS NULL )
         AND k~tknum NOT IN ( SELECT tknum FROM /bshs/ssm_eship )
         AND ( o~xegld = ' '
               OR ( o~xegld = 'X' AND
                    ( ( n~land1 = 'ES'
                        AND ( nregio = '51' OR nregio = '52'
                              OR nregio =  '35' OR nregio =  '38' ) )
                               OR n~land1 = 'ESC' ) )
                      OR ointca = 'AD' OR ointca = 'GI' ).
    Does somebody know how to reduce the execution time ?.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Try to remove the join. Use seperate selects as shown in example below and for the sake of selection, keep some key fields in your internal table.
    Then once your final table is created, you can copy the table into GT_FINAL which will contain only fields you need.
    EX
    data : begin of it_likp occurs 0,
             vbeln like likp-vbeln,
             /bshm/le_nr_cust like likp-/bshm/le_nr_cust,
             vkorg like likp-vkorg,
             werks like likp-werks,
             kunnr likr likp-kunnr,
           end of it_likp.
    data : begin of it_kna1 occurs 0,
           kunnr like...
           regio....
           land1...
          end  of it_kna1 occurs 0,
    Select tknum stabf shtyp route vsart signi dtabf
    from VTTP
    into table gt_result
    WHERE tknum IN s_tknum AND
          tplst IN s_tplst AND
          route IN s_route AND
          erdat BETWEEN s_erdat-low AND s_erdat-high.
    select vbeln /bshm/le_nr_cust
           vkorg werks kunnr
           from likp
           into table it_likp
           for all entries in gt_result
           where vbeln = gt_result-vbeln.
    select kunnr
           regio
           land1
           from kna1
           into it_kna1
           for all entries in it_likp.
    similarly for other tables.
    Then loop at gt result and read corresponding table and populate entire record :
    loop at gt_result.
    read table it_likp where vbeln = gt_result-vbeln.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
      move corresponding fields of it_likp into gt_result.
      gt_result-kunnr = it_likp-kunnr.
      modify gt_result.
    endif.
    read table it_kna1 where kunnr = gt_result-vbeln.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
      gt_result-regio = it-kna1-regio.
      gt_result-land1 = it-kna1-land1.
      modify gt_result.
    endif.
    endloop.

  • SQL Tuning and OPTIMIZER - Execution Time with  " AND col .."

    Hi all,
    I get a question about SQL Tuning and OPTIMIZER.
    There are three samples with EXPLAIN PLAN and execution time.
    This "tw_pkg.getMaxAktion" is a PLSQL Package.
    1.) Execution Time : 0.25 Second
    2.) Execution Time : 0.59 Second
    3.) Execution Time : 1.11 Second
    The only difference is some additional "AND col <> .."
    Why is this execution time growing so strong?
    Many Thanks,
    Thomas
    ----[First example]---
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0
    Connected as dbadmin2
    SQL>
    SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
      2  SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
      3                    FROM studie
      4                 ) max_aktion
      5  WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900 ;
    Explained
    SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3201460684
    | Id  | Operation            | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |   220 |   880 |     5  (40)| 00:00:
    |*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |   220 |   880 |     5  (40)| 00:00:
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900)
    13 rows selected
    SQL>
    Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 0.25 seconds
    ----[/First]---
    ----[Second example]---
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0
    Connected as dbadmin2
    SQL>
    SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
      2  SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
      3                    FROM studie
      4                 ) max_aktion
      5  WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
      6    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 692;
    Explained
    SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3201460684
    | Id  | Operation            | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |    11 |    44 |     6  (50)| 00:00:
    |*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |    11 |    44 |     6  (50)| 00:00:
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900 AND
                  "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>692)
    14 rows selected
    SQL>
    Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 0.59 seconds
    ----[/Second]---
    ----[Third example]---
    SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
      2  SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, tw_pkg.getMaxAktion(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
      3                    FROM studie
      4                 ) max_aktion
      5  WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
      6    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 692
      7    AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id <> 392;
    Explained
    SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3201460684
    | Id  | Operation            | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |     1 |     4 |     6  (50)| 00:00:
    |*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C005393 |     1 |     4 |     6  (50)| 00:00:
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       1 - filter("TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<900 AND
                  "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>692 AND
                  "TW_PKG"."GETMAXAKTION"("STUDIE_ID")<>392)
    15 rows selected
    SQL>
    Execution time (PL/SQL Developer says): 1.11 seconds
    ----[/Third]---Edited by: thomas_w on Jul 9, 2010 11:35 AM
    Edited by: thomas_w on Jul 12, 2010 8:29 AM

    Hi,
    this is likely because SQL Developer fetches and displays only limited number of rows from query results.
    This number is a parameter called 'sql array fetch size', you can find it in SQL Developer preferences under Tools/Preferences/Database/Advanced tab, and it's default value is 50 rows.
    Query scans a table from the beginning and continue scanning until first 50 rows are selected.
    If query conditions are more selective, then more table rows (or index entries) must be scanned to fetch first 50 results and execution time grows.
    This effect is usually unnoticeable when query uses simple and fast built-in comparison operators (like = <> etc) or oracle built-in functions, but your query uses a PL/SQL function that is much more slower than built-in functions/operators.
    Try to change this parameter to 1000 and most likely you will see that execution time of all 3 queries will be similar.
    Look at this simple test to figure out how it works:
    CREATE TABLE studie AS
    SELECT row_number() OVER (ORDER BY object_id) studie_id,  o.*
    FROM (
      SELECT * FROM all_objects
      CROSS JOIN
      (SELECT 1 FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 100)
    ) o;
    CREATE INDEX studie_ix ON studie(object_name, studie_id);
    ANALYZE TABLE studie COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION very_slow_function(action IN NUMBER)
    RETURN NUMBER
    IS
    BEGIN
      RETURN action;
    END;
    /'SQL array fetch size' parameter in SQLDeveloper has been set to 50 (default). We will run 3 different queries on test table.
    Query 1:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      1.22       1.29          0       1310          0          50
    total        3      1.22       1.29          0       1310          0          50
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
         50  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=1310 pr=0 pw=0 time=355838 us cost=5536 size=827075 card=165415)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
         50   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 2:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
          AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id > 800
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.01          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      8.40       8.62          0       9351          0          50
    total        3      8.40       8.64          0       9351          0          50
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
         50  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=9351 pr=0 pw=0 time=16988202 us cost=5552 size=41355 card=8271)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
         50   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 3:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id = 600
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.01       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1     18.72      19.16          0      19315          0           1
    total        3     18.73      19.16          0      19315          0           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5536 size=165415 card=33083)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
          1   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 1 - 1,29 sec, 50 rows fetched, 1310 index entries scanned to find these 50 rows.
    Query 2 - 8,64 sec, 50 rows fetched, 9351 index entries scanned to find these 50 rows.
    Query 3 - 19,16 sec, only 1 row fetched, 19315 index entries scanned (full index).
    Now 'SQL array fetch size' parameter in SQLDeveloper has been set to 1000.
    Query 1:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1     18.35      18.46          0      19315          0         899
    total        3     18.35      18.46          0      19315          0         899
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
        899  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=20571272 us cost=5536 size=827075 card=165415)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
        899   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 2:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id < 900
          AND max_aktion.max_aktion_id > 800
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1     18.79      18.86          0      19315          0          99
    total        3     18.79      18.86          0      19315          0          99
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
         99  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=32805696 us cost=5552 size=41355 card=8271)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
         99   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)Query 3:
    SELECT * FROM ( SELECT studie_id, very_slow_function(studie_id) AS max_aktion_id
                         FROM studie
                  ) max_aktion
    WHERE max_aktion.max_aktion_id = 600
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1     18.69      18.84          0      19315          0           1
    total        3     18.69      18.84          0      19315          0           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 93  (TEST)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN STUDIE_IX (cr=19315 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5536 size=165415 card=33083)(object id 79865)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
          1   INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'STUDIE_IX' (INDEX)And now:
    Query 1 - 18.46 sec, 899 rows fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.
    Query 2 - 18.86 sec, 99 rows fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.
    Query 3 - 18.84 sec, 1 row fetched, 19315 index entries scanned.

  • How to get the query execution time

    Hi,
    I am new to oracle and I am trying to get the execution time of a query.I tried the command set timing on and executed the query.But,the time it gives me is including the display of results.In my case,I ran a query against 50 million records and it is taking around 5 hours to display all the results.I like to know,how much time it take just to execute the query?Please help.
    Thanks
    Ravi.

    Maybe this way ?
    TEST@db102 SQL> set timing on
    TEST@db102 SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    TEST@db102 SQL> select * from foo;
    332944 rows selected.
    Elapsed: 00:00:29.04
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 1245013993
    | Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |   274K|    46M|  1071   (5)| 00:00:13 |
    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| FOO  |   274K|    46M|  1071   (5)| 00:00:13 |
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statement
    Statistics
            288  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
          26570  consistent gets
           4975  physical reads
              0  redo size
       35834383  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
         244537  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          22198  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
         332944  rows processed
    TEST@db102 SQL>                                                                               

  • How to reduce the query execution time

    hai all,
    We have created query on Purchasing Cube 0PUR_C01 for
                                Purchase Order (PO) analysis for single vendor materials, but it is taking long time to execute (about 45 sec...).
    In the above Query we have used the following things:
    In Columns:
    i) Exceptional aggregation for maximum & minimum PO Net Price using reference characteristic as Calendar Day.
    ii) Minimum PO Price value we have multiplied with Actual GR Quantity for the calculation of Impact of Lowest PO Net Price.
    iii) Number of vendors calculated key figure.
    In Rows:i)     Only Material
    In Filters:
    i)     Plant with variable select Option u2013 Optional.
    ii)     Calendar Year / Month with Select Option u2013 Optional.
    iii)     Material with excluded Unassigned (#).
    iv)     Vendor with excluded Unassigned (#).
    Following are we have used for Performance:
    i)     Aggregates using Propose from query (only for this query).
    ii)     Partitioning on Calendar Year / Month (For 1 year 14 partitions) i.e. (04.2007 to 03.2008).
    iii)      Collapse.
    iv)     In RSRT we have set the following properties
    Read Mode = H
    Req.Status  = 0
    Catch Mode = 4
    Persistence Mode = 3 (BLOB)
    Optimization mode = 0.
    Our inputs to this Query:
    i)     We are passing plant range 1201 to 1299.
    ii)     Calendar Year / Month 04.2007 to 03.2008.
    So please suggest me how to reduce the execution time.
    please help me.
    Thanks,
    kiran manyam

    Hi,
    First of all its a complete question with all the details. Good work.
    As you partitioned the cube based on calmonth and you are also giving calmonth in selection, it will definitely work towards improved query performance.
    As you are putting plant values in the selection, is there any aggregate available on plant characteristics? If not creating a aggregate on plant will help.
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • How to know the number of times end users search on iStore

    How can we know the number of times end users search on iStore

    I am not sure how can you do that with Oracle but I am doing that with Google Analytics (Site Search Settings).
    Thanks
    Shazi
    Edited by: 903823 on Nov 30, 2012 7:59 AM
    Edited by: 903823 on Nov 30, 2012 7:59 AM

  • How to get the total execution time from a tkprof file

    Hi,
    I have a tkprof file. How can I get the total execution time. Going through the file i guess the sum of "Total Waited" would give the total time in the section "Elapsed times include waiting on following events:"
    . The sample of tkprof is given below.
    SQL ID: gg52tq1ajzy7t Plan Hash: 3406052038
    SELECT POSTED_FLAG
    FROM
    AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS WHERE CHECK_ID = :B1 UNION ALL SELECT POSTED_FLAG FROM
      AP_PAYMENT_HISTORY APH, AP_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS ASP WHERE CHECK_ID = :B1 AND
      NVL(APH.ORG_ID, -99) = NVL(ASP.ORG_ID, -99) AND
      (NVL(ASP.WHEN_TO_ACCOUNT_PMT, 'ALWAYS') = 'ALWAYS' OR
      (NVL(ASP.WHEN_TO_ACCOUNT_PMT, 'ALWAYS') = 'CLEARING ONLY' AND
      APH.TRANSACTION_TYPE IN ('PAYMENT CLEARING', 'PAYMENT UNCLEARING')))
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute    442      0.08       0.13          0          0          0           0
    Fetch      963      0.22       4.72        350      16955          0         521
    total     1406      0.31       4.85        350      16955          0         521
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 173     (recursive depth: 1)
    Number of plan statistics captured: 1
    Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation
             1          1          1  UNION-ALL  (cr=38 pr=3 pw=0 time=139 us)
             1          1          1   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_ALL (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=124 us cost=6 size=12 card=1)
             1          1          1    INDEX RANGE SCAN AP_INVOICE_PAYMENTS_N2 (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=92 us cost=3 size=0 card=70)(object id 27741)
             0          0          0   NESTED LOOPS  (cr=33 pr=3 pw=0 time=20897 us)
             0          0          0    NESTED LOOPS  (cr=33 pr=3 pw=0 time=20891 us cost=12 size=41 card=1)
             1          1          1     TABLE ACCESS FULL AP_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL (cr=30 pr=0 pw=0 time=313 us cost=9 size=11 card=1)
             0          0          0     INDEX RANGE SCAN AP_PAYMENT_HISTORY_N1 (cr=3 pr=3 pw=0 time=20568 us cost=2 size=0 card=1)(object id 27834)
             0          0          0    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID AP_PAYMENT_HISTORY_ALL (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=3 size=30 card=1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      db file sequential read                       350        0.15          4.33
      Disk file operations I/O                        3        0.00          0.00
      latch: shared pool                              1        0.17          0.17
    ********************************************************************************

    user13019948 wrote:
    Hi,
    I have a tkprof file. How can I get the total execution time.
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    total 1406 0.31 4.85 350 16955 0 521TOTAL ELAPSED TIME is 4.85 seconds from line above

Maybe you are looking for