How to put g95 in usr/local/bin?

Hi all,
I am trying to compile a program called elmerice. When I type the "make compile" command, I get the following message:
elmerf90-nosh -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/usr/local/bin/g95 -O5 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=nocona -fprefetch-loop-arrays -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -falign-loops -I. -Ibinio -I/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents//share/elmersolver/include -c Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.f90 -o Solvers/AIFlowSolve_nlD2.o
/Applications/ElmerGUI.app/Contents/bin/elmerf90-nosh: line 18: /usr/local/bin/g95: No such file or directory
I did install (I think successfully) g95 using macports, i.e. the command "sudo port install g95" but apparently it is not in /usr/local/bin, which seems to be where elmerice wants to find it.
One complicating factor might be that /usr/local/bin does have gfortran it.
It seems like elmerice will only use g95. Can I put g95 in the /usr/local/bin directory from wherever I have it now, and if so, how? Or can I just reinstall g95 in that directory?
Thanks,

Try creating a symbolic link from /usr/local/bin/g95 to wherever MacPorts put it. That is probably the easiest solution. Ideally, you would fix the makefile, but that wouldn't be easy.

Similar Messages

How do I delete Unix scripts in /usr/local/bin/

Well, I download a program call mpgtx (mpeg editor). After install, it put all its files to /usr/local/bin/, and there are unix scripts, mpgdemux, mpgcat..etc. So I just wander how I can delete them. Can just do rm mpg* from Terminal?
Pls, help.

I don't even HAVE a /usr/local/bin folder on either of my Leopard installs. One install does have a /usr/local folder, but everything in it was installed by the latest version of Privoxy, the other install doesn't have a /usr/local folder at all. So you won't mess up anything from the system. Whether you'll mess up some third party something or other you have installed only you can know. I suspect they probably don't take up much room, you could check that. If the amount of space consumed is trivial, you could just leave them.
Francine
Francine
Schwieder

How do I change permisson to write on /usr/local/bin??

Hi
I'm installing a software by source (PKG-CONFIG) as needed by bluefish, however which I was doing " Make install" the terminal told me that it can't write on /usr/local/bin/pkg-config......so how do I change the permission so that I can start installing??
Thanks
Chris

Precede the install command with "sudo" and use your password (provided you are an admin). Then the insatller will have permission to write as if you are the "root" user.
eg:
$ sudo install
will run "install" as if run by root - who does have permission to write to the dir.
MacBook (BootCamp), various Macs and servers Mac OS X (10.4.7)

How to change /usr/bin/grep To /usr/local/bin/grep

Hi
I have installed GNU Grep but when I am giving the command #which grep it is showing me solaris grep i.e /usr/bin/grep.
My question is how do I change it to /usr/local/bin/
Thanks in advance
Sukrut

You have a few options:
1) place /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin in your PATH environment variable
2) remove /usr/bin/grep altogether
3) move /usr/bin/grep to something else (ie: /usr/bin/solaris/grep) and symlink /usr/bin/grep to /usr/local/bin/grep just in case any hard coded programs/scripts rely on /usr/bin/grep being present.
I prefer step #3 since most of the various gnu utilities are virtually 100% drop-in replacements.

How do I add /usr/local/bin to path

Hi.
I have installed arch linux on a server.
It seems really very good - manged to install latest snort-inline easily...
However (and this is really a completely NOOB question)
- how do I add /usr/local/bin to the default (root) path ?
I have tried to add
PATH=/usr/local/bin
to /etc/enviornment
But it did not show up when using the - env command (after re-logging in)
I know that I could sym link to /usr/bin but i would like to know.
Any help would be good
Cheers
Last edited by yossarianuk (2008-10-02 10:31:21)

There's a place for all three of /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, and ~/bin --- even on Arch.
If you download package whizbang-1.2.3 from some non-Arch site, its installer will often by default try to install its files into the /usr/local hierarchy. When making a PKGBUILD, you want to tell it instead to install into $pkgdir/usr, so that when you install the resulting pkg file with pacman, it goes into the /usr hierarchy. That's what the wiki page is saying: pacman-managed stuff goes into the /usr hierarchy.
/usr/local/* is for files you want to install systemwide without making a PKGBUILD. Your own scripts are a great example. Also you might want to install some compiled files that way, if making a PKGBUILD isn't worth it or you don't have the time to write (*and maintain!*) one.
~/bin is for scripts (could be compiled files too) that you want to only be available to that specific user.

Usr/local/bin...or where?

hey guys,
I just made a package of sylpheed claws 2.00. Everything went ok, but the binary was placed in /usr/local/bin. For reasons I don't quite understand, this is not an arch-like place to be. So where should I put it, and how should I modify my pkgbuild to put it there?
btw, here's the fairly plain pkgbuild;
pkgname=sylpheed-claws
pkgver=2.0.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The stable extended version of sylpheed"
url="http://claws.sylpheed.org/"
licence=""
depends=(pkgconfig libetpan)
makedepends=()
conflicts=()
replaces=()
backup=()
install=
source=(http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/sylpheed-claws/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('7ddfc626484ae0954a78c5233931e21a')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
./configure --with-gtk2
make || return 1
make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
also, what forum should I have posted this to?
thanks!

Well ... it CAN be set to anywhere you like, but compliance with the Arch Packaging Standards would be preferable - or mandatory, if you want to submit your PKGBUILD to the AUR. A quick read of the AUR User Guidelines would also be useful in that case.
General hints -
./configure --help
will give you all the options for most apps. The ABS wiki pages provide the Arch-specific stuff.

/usr/local/bin OR /opt/local/bin

I recently installed osxvnc and the install program put it into /opt/local/bin. I already had /usr/local/bin etc.
Is there a standard way of doing this - that is using /opt/local or /usr/local or is opt for optional programs and /usr/local for locally developed programs?
TIA

Fink uses /sw and darwinports uses /opt/local specifically so that what you have in /usr/local doesn't interfere with fink, or with darwinports, and that their installs don't interfere with what you install manually into /usr/local.
Use /usr/local for software you compile by hand that installs in there by default. Keep fink and darwinports separate from this, and separate from each other. The best way to do this is to leave everything as it is.
If you want to, you can configure fink (and I assume darwinports) to install everything into /usr/local. Again, I suggest you not do it for the same reasons as just given. More details of how and why this was done are available on the fink and on the darwinports documentation sites.

/usr/local/bin

Hello everyone,
Whenever i am installing any s/w from source by compiling,its executable is getting stored in /usr/local/bin.Now im unable to use the s/w by just typing its executable name in the terminal,its giving me an error as "command not found".what i have to do is browse to the directory /usr/local/bin n then run the executable as ./xxxxx.How can i add the directory /usr/local/bin so that it too is checked for executables.
Thanks in advance,
Rajiv Nair.

Anyway, /usr/local is made just for those things you do not want to be touched by your package manager. So, if for any reason you do not want to write a PKGBUILD for something (if e.g., it is just a little script you wrote and you want to install it system-wide; or you have some reasons to make the compilation routine step by step), then /usr/local is then just the right place: /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin for executable with various permissions, /usr/local/lib for the libraries, may be /usr/local/src for the sources, etc. Then you should just modify your /etc/profile (or your .bashrc, .zshrc).
This is not what is supported by arch, but it is something you can always do, if you like so, in any linux system of the world.

Simple script in /usr/local/bin just won't start - SOLVED

I put this really simple script for starting psi into my /usr/local/bin, set it a+xr and added /usr/local/bin to my path. However, I just can't start the damn thing.
Here's the script itself (I really don't think there's something wrong with it, since if I type it in the shell it works fine):
#!/bin/zsh/
#start psi, never stop
while true;
do psi;
done
Here's my users $PATH:
─$ print $PATH
/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/local/bin:/opt/kde/bin:/opt/mozilla/bin:/opt/qt/bin
Here's the permissions of the script:
$ ls -lah /usr/local/bin
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Dec 15 03:52 ./
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 240 Dec 10 18:55 ../
-rwxrwxr-x 1 kamagurka users 60 Dec 15 03:51 psi.start*
And here's what happens when I try to execute it:
$ psi.start
zsh: command not found: psi.start
So, I'm either missing something incredibly obvious, or something freaky's going on here. I hope it's the former.
EDIT: I had no idea where to put this, so I put it into Desktop Env since I'm trying to start a graphical app, but feel free to move it.
EDIT: Yea, I was being a little dense.

smoon wrote:Not sure if that's the problem, but try removing the trailing / (slash) from your script's shebang.
See, something really obvious. Stupid, even. You can see, I don't do a lot of scripting.

Question about /usr/local/bin in Mavericks ...

I just did a clean install of Mavericks on a 2010 MacPro. I understand Mavericks does not replicate this path (/usr/local/bin) when doing a clean install. Prior to this I was running 10.7.xx and I had a few compiled binaries installed in the bin folder. How do I address this? Can I simply recreate the path manually without risk?
Thanks.
-paul.

etresoft The 905
Re: Question about /usr/local/bin in Mavericks ...
Jan 15, 2014 9:30 AM (in response to Paul Figgiani)
So why would you expect /usr/local/bin to be there? If you install custom, low-level software like this on one system, it will not get migrated to the new system.
As I stated in my original post I did not expect it to be there. All I'm asking is how do I adreess the issue? Do I recreate it manually without any risk of screwing something up?

$PATH missing '/usr/local/bin'

$PATH missing '/usr/local/bin' in /etc/login.defs and /etc/profile.
I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3 and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!). This, not being in my $PATH by default.
Please consider adding this line to future ARCH 0.6 or beyond for WORKSTATION users:
# /etc/profile
export PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/bin"
Thanx.

Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:I only noticed, being somewhat a noob, after compiling the NEW Dillo 0.7.3
A very wise decision to use this great browser :-) ... and I'm even serious about that.
Mt.Tam-Luxer wrote:and finding that it places its' executable in /usr/local/bin (!). This, not being in my $PATH by default.
For some reason it is in my /etc/profile ... but I don't remember if I put it there or not.
Firstly, (and as already mentioned more or less) I can see arguments why AL does not include /usr/local/bin by default (mainly because there is nothing there when only installing AL packages).
But OTOH, this is the beauty of AL : you can (and are even supposed to) configure your system as you like by editing the files in /etc. I guess that's why I don't remember, because the first thing I would do if need be is editing /etc/profile ;-) ...
Oh, but something (very general !) to consider : if you want to keep your system "Unix-style", don't put every posible PATH in /etc/profile, but put it in ~/.profile (or whatever shell you are using). If you are the only user, it does not really matter. But in a "true multi-user Unix system" you should not have /funky/path/bin in /etc/ ... not that /usr/local is exotic ....this is more of a general note.
sarah31 wrote:but imho if there is a PKGBUILD for a desired app (such as dillo)
yes, the PKGBUILD for dillo works fine, however, last week they released the latest version 0.7.3 which Mt.Tam-Luxer tried to install ( ... hint ... hint ... package maintainers ... :-) ... ). It was not quite clear from your post if yo wanted him to modify the PKGBUILD script or to just use it.
Oh, and besides changing pkgver, the source should now point to http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2

10g SuSE asks for /usr/local/bin

The 10g runInstaller program is asking me for the local bin directory. Oracle then proceeds to install some binaries there.
It prompts me with
/usr/local/bin so I have thus far put them here. But I am wondering if the the oracle user's bin (unix user account)i.e. /home/oracle/bin would be better as later linux patches might remove/damage these files.
Any opinions?
regards
Ben

I wouldn't worry too much about those files : oracle user already has them it its $ORACLE_HOME/bin directory.
Anyway, you could make a copy of them before installing any other Oracle product. The files copied in /usr/local/bin are normally oraenv, coraenv and dbhome.

OK to create /usr/local/bin?

Hi,
I tried today to install the command line utility for Growl, growlnotify. The installer script failed because it tried to install into /usr/local/bin which isn't there currently.
Now, is it OK to just go ahead and run "mkdir /usr/local/bin" to create the directory? I am not very experienced with Unix so I usually don't touch the unix directories so that I don't mess up anything...
Thanks!
Ingo

If you are the only or primary user of your computer, and you want to mess around, /usr/local is as good a place as any, since most software installs in it by default. Another option is to do stuff in your home directory.
If you have a dumb installer or Makefile that tries to install and possibly over-write files in say /usr/bin, you would be tipped off by install permission failure, whereas if you issued "sudo make install" you are at the mercy of whomever wrote the Makefile.
I actually build stuff in my home directory and install it into root-owned /usr/local, and the first time I issue "make -i install" I do it without write permissions and I can watch where it tries to put stuff. That is excessively paranoid. But its when you stop being paranoid.
Anyway, it doesn't much matter. For security reasons on a multiuser system, it is best to have multi-user accessed executables in root-owned directories.

Accessing /usr/local/bin directory

I'm new to Unix and trying to access the directories /usr/local/bin and usr/local/lib to put files into that I need to run a program, but Terminal keeps telling me "no such file or directory." I am doing this work on my own computer, but do I need special permission to access these files?
Any advice on moving the files into these directories?

Usually, files get into /usr/local when you run "configure && make && sudo make install". Since you're new, I would suggest running "configure", "make", and "sudo make install" separately until you get the hang of it.

My /usr/local/bin is empty.

Hi,
My /usr/local/bin is empty.
Before that I have tried to install newer version of python and the installation got stuck and the computer was rebooted
and a blue screen is appreard.
I did re- install OSX and it solved the blue screen issue but the folder still was empty.
Later I did upgrading to mountain lion but the folder is still empty!
What could be the reason?
How can I restore it?
Thanks,
Nimrod

If the applications are still working, they weren't installed there! If not, you will either need to re-populate that directory from your backup, or re-install the applications.

How to put g95 in usr/local/bin?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for