Howto use jsp with where-clause restriction for viewObject

hello there,
i am currently trying to figure out how to pass parameters via url to the jsp,
so that the corresponding viewobjects where clause can be extended and i only get the select-results that i want. i am familiar with doing this in a stright java-environment but don't know how to implement it in a jsp-client.
does anyone know something about this or can name me a ressource i can read about that.
Thanx
Selim Keser

thank you, but i have only 19 days left for
my diploma and nobody in this company can help me with this issue.
what i need is an example or something like a reciept about what to do
to achieve the following:
I want to type in an url like:
localhost:8080/myapp/browse.jsp?customerid=123
so that i can extend the where-clause in my ViewObject
and only see the rows of customer 123 in my jsp.
it is a bit hard for a newbie to figure out how to pass down the parameters way down to the ViewObject. I am shure that this is easy to do once one understands the how it works. This is my first "Web-Experience" and I am running out of time.
Thanx
Selim Keser

Similar Messages

Using distinct in where clause

Greedings,
I am trying to execute some kind of distinct using rowid in where clause but for some reason im not getting the appropriate result. Any guidance is welcome
SELECT acnt_code,cat,cat_desc,buc FROM so_budgets_cat where
Trim(buc)='S03'
and
NOT exists (SELECT 1
                   from   so_budgets_cat tab2
                   where ( tab2.cat     = so_budgets_cat.cat )
                   and    tab2.ROWID > so_budgets_cat.ROWID
ORDER BY cat,so_budgets_cat.rowidThanks in advance

Additionally to the fact that we don't have an idea on the expected output, I can't understand the comparison of ROWIDs in your query. These are the logical addresses where the data reside in the disks, comparing them doesn't make sense to me; Oracle DB defines where to store, based on space availability in the disk allocation to the database occupation - and NOT in a logical sequence.
Maybe the existing row is stored in an address that is not a higher number than other, and so it is not being retrieved in your sub-query - hence your test for distinction is failing.

Can both in-row and off-row LOBs be used in a where clause?

We are preparing to upgrade ASE from version 15.5 to 16.0. One of the features that is very appealing has to do with the changes made concerning the handling of LOBs. In particular, the ability to use a LOB column in search arguments (where clause) is something our developers have longed for since the retirement of the full-text search option. So, in version 16.0, can any column with a datatype of text be used as a search argument? Are there any restrictions.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Kevin,
The in-row LOB feature is mainly designed to save space when a text column has many short values, which is a particularly bad problem when the server uses a large page size (like 16K) as ASE would use a full 16K to store even a single bye "Y". I don't think the feature made any change in how text can be used in search arguments. i.e. you can still use LIKE and IS [NOT] NULL, but not others.
Example:
1> create table t (x text in row (8))
2> go
1> insert t values ("abc")
2> insert t values ("abcdefghijkl")
3> go
(2 rows affected)
1> select * from t where x like "%c%"
2> go
x
abc
abcdefghijkl
(2 rows affected)
1> select * from t where x !> "c"
2> go
Msg 257, Level 16, State 1:
Server 'redhead', Line 1:
Implicit conversion from datatype 'TEXT' to 'VARCHAR' is not allowed. Use the
CONVERT function to run this query.
Msg 306, Level 16, State 5:
Server 'redhead', Line 1:
TEXT, IMAGE and UNITEXT datatypes may not be used in a WHERE clause, except with
the LIKE expression and IS [NOT] NULL predicate on columns.

Populate list by executing query with where clause

Hi,
I m populating my list from database table using following command.
EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("learning", new HashMap());
EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager();
String query = "select d from Dept d";
List list = em.createQuery(query).getResultList();
My list is getting populated with all of rows in my database table(dept). The problem is, I cant use where clause in my query string.
String query = "select d from Dept d where d.dept_name='ANYNAME'";
Moreover I cant select even indivisual columns by using following line
String query = "select d.dept_code,d.dept_name from Dept d";
It looks like that my query is getting all rows from table as Object.
What to do to
1. put some where clause
2. get some particular colums instead of all columns
3. apply some table joins in query
plz help.

Hi Alex,
I misunderstood your question. You had mentioned "My list is getting populated with all of rows in my database table(dept). The problem is, I cant use where clause in my query string. "
I thought you might not have permissions to modify the code in the class, and that's why I suggested that you could write new classes.
1) write new classes,? means if I need just two columns from a table >(instead of all columns), do I need to write new class with just two >columns (getters and setters)?You can write a SQL statement anyway you want , there are no restrictions in JDBC , so if you need just 2 columns you can write a custom query for that.
"select column1 as a, column2 as be from table_name where column3 = xyz" etc.
2) Is not anyway to write SQL statement like
select dept_code,dept_name from dept where dept_name='anything'The above SQL is correct, it should work.
3) Stored procedures? can I get some example(code) to get an idea >how to implement complex queries with where clause and joinings >using stored procedures?Stored procedures are specific to the database you are using, Oracle has a particular syntax for store procdures.
You can call stored procedures from JDBC also, search on Google for
"Calling stored procedures from JDBC"
4) I m using hibernate. can I get any example of using hibernate own >query?Tutorial on Hibernate Query Language:
http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/v3/reference/en/html/queryhql.html

Export (expdp) with where clause

Hello Gurus,
I am trying to export with where clause. I am getting below error.
Here is my export command.
expdp "'/ as sysdba'" tables = USER1.TABLE1 directory=DATA_PUMP dumpfile=TABLE1.dmp logfile=TABLE1.log query= “USER1.TABLE1:where auditdate>'01-JAN-10'” Here is error
[keeth]DB1 /oracle/data_15/db1> DATA_PUMP dumpfile=TABLE1.dmp logfile=TABLE1.log query= USER1.TABLE1:where auditdate>'01-JAN-10' <
Export: Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production on Tue Mar 26 03:03:26 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Starting "SYS"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_03": "/******** AS SYSDBA" tables=USER1.TABLE1 directory=DATA_PUMP dumpfile=TABLE1.dmp logfile=TABLE1.log query= USER1.TABLE1:where auditdate
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
Total estimation using BLOCKS method: 386 MB
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/GRANT/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/INDEX_STATISTICS
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TRIGGER
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/STATISTICS/TABLE_STATISTICS
ORA-31693: Table data object "USER1"."TABLE1" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Master table "SYS"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_03" successfully loaded/unloaded
Dump file set for SYS.SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_03 is:
/oracle/data_15/db1/TABLE1.dmp
Job "SYS"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_03" completed with 1 error(s) at 03:03:58Version
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

Hello,
You should use parameter file.Another question i can see you are using 11g.Why don't you use data pump?.
Data Pump is faster and have more features and enhancement than regular imp and exp.
You can do the following:
sqlplus / as sysdba
Create directory DPUMP_DIR3 for 'Type here your os path that you want to export to';then touch a file:
touch par.txt
In this file type the following the following :
tables=schema.table_name
dumpfile=yourdump.dmp
DIRECTORY=DPUMP_DIR3
logfile=Your_logfile.log
QUERY =abs.texp:"where hiredate>'01-JAN-13' "then do the following
expdp username/password parfile='par.txt'
If you will import from Oracle 11g to version 10g then you have to addthe parameter "version=10" to the parameter file above
BR
Mohamed ELAzab
http://mohamedelazab.blogspot.com/

Outer Join with Where Clause in LTS

HI all,
I have a requirement like this in ANSI SQL:
select p1.product_id, p1.product_name, p2.product_group
from product p1 left outer join product_group p2 on p1.product_id = p2.product_id
and p2.product_group = 'NEW'
In Regular SQL:
select p1.product_id, p1.product_name, p2.product_group
from product p1, product_group p2
WHERE p1.product_id *= p2.product_id and p2.product_group = 'NEW'
In OBIEE, I am using a left outer join between these two in Logical table Source, and also, Gave
p2.product_group = 'NEW' in WHERE clause of LTS.
This doesn't seem to solve purpose.
Do you have any idea how to convert WHERE clause in physical query that OBIEE is generating to something like
product p1 left outer join product_group p2 on p1.product_id = p2.product_id AND p2.product_group = 'NEW'
I am using Version 10.1.3.4.1
Creating an Opaque view would be my last option though.

Hello
I have read your post and the responses as well. and I understand that you have issues with the Outer Join with where Clause in LTS.
Try this solution which worked for me (using your example ) -
1. In the Physical Layer created a Complex join between PRODUCT and PRODUCT_GROUP tables and use this join relationship :
PRODUCT.PROD_ID = PRODUCT_GROUP.PROD_ID AND PRODUCT_GROUP.GROUP_NAME = 'MECHANICAL'
2. In the General Tab of PRODUCT table LTS add PRODUCT_GROUP table and select Join Type as Left Outer Join.
3. Check Consistency and make sure there are no errors .
when you run a request you should see the following query generated -
select distinct T26908.PROD_ID as c1,
     T26908.PROD_NAME as c2,
     T26912.GROUP_NAME as c3
from
     PRODUCT T26908 left outer join PRODUCT_GROUP T26912 On T26908.PROD_ID = T26912.PROD_ID and T26912.GROUP_NAME = 'MECHANICAL'
order by c1, c2, c3
Hope this works for you. If it does please mark this response as 'Correct' .
Good Luck.

Using Date in where clause

Hello all,
I am new to Oracle, currently using 10G + aspvbscript.
I've been trying to query data using date in where clause but nothing seems to work.
The column is in date format.
It gets printed out like this: 5/1/2010 11:21:19 AM
I tried using this query:
SELECT * from table where TRUNC(user_date) > to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS') order by user_date asc.
It does return an output but it returns everything in table and does not take WHERE clause into consideration however, it does sort the date in ascending order.
I've tried getting rid of TRUNC tried to format date in a different way but no such luck.
Please point me to the right direction.
Thanks.

Welcome to the forums!
In cases like this it is helpful if you can provide the following information:
1. Oracle version (SELECT * FROM V$VERSION)
2. Sample data in the form of CREATE / INSERT statements.
3. Expected output
4. Explanation of expected output (A.K.A. "business logic")
5. Use \ tags for #2 and #3. See FAQ (Link on top right side) for details.
I'll try and take a stab at your request based on the data given. What your query says is that it will return all rows that have a date greater then 2/1/2010 (MM/DD/YYYY). If your query is returning all rows then maybe the possibility exists that all the dates in the table are greater then 2/1/2010. Have you checked all dates to see if this is the case?
Also, one note about your TO_DATE() function.to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS')The date format does not match the string you are using with respect to month. Your string has 'FEB' but the format is 'MM' which is the numeric representation of the month. Although Oracle was able to convert it to the proper date on my system you should try and maintain consistency between the string and the date format used.

Offset in where clause of for all entries

Hi ,
I need to fetch VBELN from VBKD table based on Purchase order no which is fetched from a Z-table.So I am using for all entries with where condition as VBKD-BSTKD_M = Ztable-PONumber and fetching values from VBKD .But at times PO number in VBKD table can have additional things attached to it .
Eg Ztable-PO number = 12345678 , VBKD-BSTKD_M = 12345678-001 so I need to ignore the '-001' part and still fetch data from VBKD.So how can I do that.
Pls let me know if you have any ideas.
Thanks in advance,
Rajasekaran

Hi ,
We cannot use offset directly in where as it will result in syntax error as the field length for both fields have to match .In my case the length of both Ztable -PO number field and vbkd-bstkd_m are 35 characters.So cannot use offset directly in where clause of for all entries.
Pls let me know if you have any other ideas.
Thanks in advance,
Rajsekaran

Hierarchical query with where clause

Hi,
How can I query hierarchically a query with WHERE clause? I have a table with three fields session_id,id and root_id.
When I try with the following query,
select id, level from relation
where session_id = 79977
connect by prior id = root_id start with id = 5042;
It gets duplicate values.
I want the query to show in the hierarchical manner with a filter condition using WHERE clause. Please help me how can I achieve this. If you know any link that describes more about this, please send it.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
-Parmy

Hi Sridhar Murthy an others,
Thanks a lot for your/the answer. It's working for me. It saved a lot of other work around without the proper knowledge of hierarchical query. Please send me any link that describes these issues in detail and also I hope as I have mentioned in the other message, same cannot be achieved on views or ( on two different tables ???)
Any way thanks for your reply,
It's working for me.
With happiness,
-Parmy

Using a dummy where-clause to force the use of an index

I notice that an index only gets used when I use the index key in the where clause. Should I use a dummy where clause to force the index to be used?
SQL> create table emp (
2 empno NUMBER(5),
3 empname VARCHAR2(15) );
Table created.
SQL> create index idx_emp_no on emp (empno);
Index created.
SQL> insert into emp (empno, empname) values (1, 'Peter');
1 row created.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly;
SQL> select empno from emp;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 1 | 13 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> select empno from emp where empno > 0;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 434430053
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_EMP_NO | 1 | 13 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
As you can see, using a dummy where clause (empno > 0), I manage to reduce the cost from 3 to 1.

Again. Be careful with comparisons. But I like the discussion. It is usefull to carefully look at what happens "behind the scenes" and find a sensible explaination for that.
Your new scenario now is different. By selecting one specific row instead of selection all you already made an assumption. That only one or few of the rows are returned. Andre's statement still is correct. Now the CBO will prefere the index scan.
The CBO now has to decide between two options.
Option a) use the index.
This means =>
Step 1: Access the index to find the value
Step 2: Access the table using the rowid that was found in the index leaf entry.
Option b) scan the full table
This means =>
Step 1: Iterate over all rows of the table
Step 2: Apply a filter condition (empno = :x)
We can see this execution plan by adding a hint to the query.
select /*+ FULL(emp) */ * from emp where empno = 1;This hint will force the CBO to access the table emp using a full table scan.
The cost in my environment for option B is 3.
Option A has a cost with 2. Therefore the CBO prefers Option A.
However this can easily change.
Consider the following
begin
for i in 1..1000 loop
    insert into emp (empno, empname) values (1, 'Employee');
end loop;
end;
commit;
execute dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'EMP');The run the select again.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select * from emp where empno = 1;
1001 Zeilen ausgewõhlt.
Ausf³hrungsplan
Plan hash value: 3956160932
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      | 1001 | 12012 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 1001 | 12012 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("EMPNO"=1)
Statistiken
          1 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
         74 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      18356 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1250 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
       1001 rows processedThe CBO now prefers the full table scan and not the index access.
If we force it to use an index then the cost increases.
SQL> set linesize 100
SQL> select /*+INDEX(emp) */ * from emp where empno = 1
1001 Zeilen ausgewõhlt.
Ausf³hrungsplan
Plan hash value: 2426388914
| Id | Operation                   | Name      | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |           | 1001 | 12012 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP       | 1001 | 12012 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_EMPNO | 1001 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("EMPNO"=1)
Statistiken
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
        139 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      30550 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1250 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         67 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
       1001 rows processed
SQL>The cost using the index range scan is now 5. WHile the FTS is still 3. Therefore the CBO prefers to use the FTS.

Error while using REMAP_TABLE and WHERE clause together in IMPDP

I am trying to move some records from a very large table to another small table.
I am facing trouble while using REMAP_TABLE and WHERE clause together in IMPDP.
Problem is data filter is not getting applied and all records are getting imported.
here is how I have simulated this. please advice.
CREATE TABLE TSHARRHB.TMP1
A NUMBER,
B NUMBER
begin
Insert into TSHARRHB.TMP1
   (A, B)
Values
   (1, 1);
Insert into TSHARRHB.TMP1
   (A, B)
Values
   (2, 2);
COMMIT;
end;
expdp system/password TABLES=tsharrhb.TMP1 DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp REUSE_DUMPFILES=YES LOGFILE=EXP.log PARALLEL=8
impdp system/password DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY='TSHARRHB.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2"' REMAP_TABLE=TSHARRHB.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Import: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Fri Dec 13 05:13:30 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP, Data Mining
and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/********@GRD6.RBSG DIRECTORY=GRDP_EXP_DIR DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=SSD_93_TABLES_FULL_EXP.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=TSHARRHB.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=TSHARRHB.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
. . imported "TSHARRHB"."TMP3"                           5.421 KB       2 rows
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully completed at 05:13:33
here I am expecting only 1 record to get imported but both the records are getting imported. please advice.

The strange thing compared to your output is that I get an error when I have table prefix in the query block:
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/******** DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=SYSADM.TMP1:"WHERE TMP1.A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=SYSADM.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
ORA-31693: Table data object "SYSADM"."TMP3" failed to load/unload and is being skipped due to error:
ORA-38500: Unsupported operation: Oracle XML DB not present
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" completed with 1 error(s) at Fri Dec 13 10:39:11 2013 elapsed 0 00:00:03
And if I remove it, it works:
Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Master table "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01": system/******** DUMPFILE=TMP1.dmp LOGFILE=imp.log PARALLEL=8 QUERY=SYSADM.TMP1:"WHERE A = 2" REMAP_TABLE=SYSADM.TMP1:TMP3 CONTENT=DATA_ONLY
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
. . imported "SYSADM"."TMP3"                             5.406 KB       1 out of 2 rows
Job "SYSTEM"."SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01" successfully completed at Fri Dec 13 10:36:50 2013 elapsed 0 00:00:01
Nicolas.
PS: as you can see, I'm on 11.2.0.4, I do not have 11.2.0.1 that you seem to use.

Merge with where clause after matched and unmatched

Hai,
Can anybody give me one example of merge statement with
where clause after matched condition and after the unmatched condition.
MERGE INTO V1 VV1
USING (SELECT     A.CNO XXCNO, A.SUNITS XXSU, A.DDATE XXDD, XX.SUM_UNITS SUMMED
FROM V1 A,
(SELECT
SUM(SUNITS) SUM_UNITS FROM V1 B
GROUP BY CNO) c
WHERE
A.DDATE=0 AND A.SUNITS <>0 AND
A.ROWID=(SELECT MAX(ROWID) FROM V1 )) XX
ON (1=1)
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET
VV1.SUNITS=XX.SUMMED
WHERE XX.XXDD=0
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT
(VV1.CNO, VV1.SUNITS, VV1.SUNITS)
VALUES (XX.XXCNO, XX.XXSU, XX.XXDD)
WHERE XX.XXDD<>0
i am getting the error
WHERE XX.XXDD=0
ERROR at line 13:
ORA-00905: missing keyword
Thanks,
Pal

One of the example is there:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10759/statements_9016.htm#sthref7014
What Oracle version do you use ?
Besides the condition (1=1) is non-deterministic,
I would expect there an exception like "unable to get a stable set of rows".
Rgds.

Insert with Where Clause

Hi,
Can we write Insert with 'Where' clause? I'm looking for something similar to the below one (which is giving me an error)
insert into PS_AUDIT_OUT (AUDIT_ID, EMPLID, RECNAME, FIELDNAME, MATCHVAL, ERRORMSG)
Values ('1','10000139','NAMES','FIRST_NAME',';','')
Where AUDIT_ID IN
( select AUDIT_ID from PS_AUDIT_FLD where AUDIT_ID ='1' and RECNAME ='NAMES'
AND FIELDNAME = 'FIRST_NAME' AND MATCHVAL = ';' );
Thanks
Durai

It is not clear what are you trying to do, but it looks like:
insert
into PS_AUDIT_OUT(
                    AUDIT_ID,
                    EMPLID,
                    RECNAME,
                    FIELDNAME,
                    MATCHVAL,
                    ERRORMSG
select '1',
        '10000139',
        'NAMES',
        'FIRST_NAME',
from PS_AUDIT_FLD
where AUDIT_ID = '1'
    and RECNAME ='NAMES'
    and FIELDNAME = 'FIRST_NAME'
    and MATCHVAL = ';'
SY.

Using function in where clause

I have created a function as follows
create or replace FUNCTION get_codes RETURN varchar2 IS
scodes varchar2(50) := 'A1,A2';
BEGIN
scodes := '('''||REPLACE(scodes,',',''',''')||''')';
return scodes;
END;
this function returns ('A1','A2')
now i want to use this in where clause, both below statements fetches no rows
select * from tablea where code in (select get_codes from dual);
select * from tablea where code in get_codes;
but the following will fetch rows
select * from tablea where code in ('A1','A2')
how to use function in where clause
Thanks

Hi,
The code that works:
where code in ('A1','A2')is testing whther code is either of two 2-character strings, A1 or A2.
The ones that don't work, such as:
where code in get_codes;are comparing code to one 9-character string: 'A1','A2', where characters 1, 4, 6 and 9 are single-quotes. (The function can only return one value.)
You can use dynamic SQL to embed that 9-character string in part of your query, where it will be interpreted as two 2-character strrings.
[Oracle Base|http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/DynamicInLists.php] and AskTom have good pages on the subject of dynamic IN-lists.
Of you can use INSTR or LIKE:
where INSTR ( get_codes
, '''' || code || ''''
) > 0

I've been using LR with my Nikon D3200 for a year or so. Shooting in RAW/NEF no issues with import etc until I updated LR and now I can't get LR to allow me to select when I try to import. It does show the images but they're grayed out and not able to be

I've been using LR with my Nikon D3200 for a year or so. Shooting in RAW/NEF no issues with import etc until I updated LR and now I can't get LR to allow me to select when I try to import. It does show the images but they're grayed out and not able to be selected. Any thoughts? TIA

Greyed imaged in the Import dialog box mean you have already imported the photos into Lightroom, so there is no need and no benefit to importing them a second time.
Just go to the Library module, search for the desired photos, and resume working on these photos.

Howto use jsp with where-clause restriction for viewObject

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for