HT6019 Automatic Tuning in Garageband 10.0.1

Hello, Can someone please help me.. I do a lot of vocal recording using Garageband 6.0.5 and a usb mic, when editing finished recordings i like to add some reverb and amongst other filters I use the automatic tuning slider that used to appear in the audio region box on the bottom left hand side of the screen.
Can someone please tell me where to find this feature in Garageband 10.0.1???
Im by no means an expert with Garageband, But I would think I've a good understanding of most of its uses.
Hope someone else has had the same problem and can point me in the right direction,
Thanks,  Phill

Phill85 wrote:
It really doesn't give the same effect it used to "when called automatic tuning"??
there are lots of changes in v10. if you want the same effects you had in v6, keep using it, installing v10 doesn't delete v6

Similar Messages

  • What are the difference and relations between Automatic Tuning Optimizer...

    What are the difference and relations between Automatic Tuning Optimizer and Automatic SQL Tuning Advisor?
    In my opinion, they are same.

    SQL> SELECT * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    CORE    11.1.0.6.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production

  • Vocal tuning in GarageBand on Ipad

    Hey guys, new to this so bear with me. I'm trying to find out if there is a way to tune vocals in GarageBand for Ipad. Any help would be awesome. Thanks.

    Do you have headphones with the mic/controls on it? If you have a set for the iPhone, plug them into your iPad to see if you can record that audio. If you can, then we can look into why it can't record the other way.
    If you don't have those, I'll try loading GarageBand on my first iPad and see what happens.

  • [OCP exam] doubt about Automatic SQL Tuning Advisor

    Hi,
    Sorry for my poor english.
    I am currently preparing for the OCP  11g exam.
    For that, I have bought some training tools  to help me prepare the exam.
    But, in the chapter related to the SQL tuning advisor, some explanation really confuse me .
    Extract :
    <<
    the SQL automatic tuning  job runs every night during the maintenance window.
    By default, the job makes SQL profile recommendations, tests them, and automatically implements them if they provide better performance improvement)
    >>
    I was persuaded it was the opposite.
    I check several databases/documentation, and it's seems to be always the opposite.
    By default,new sql profile are tested but not implemented automatically (you have to set a parameter ACCEPT_SQL_PROFILES TO TRUE to activate this option)
    But the exam is validated on oracle 11.2.0.1, and I only have 11.2.0.2/11.2.0.3 db available.
    So may be oracle changed the value of the default parameter in the new releases.
    Can someone confirm if I am right or not ?

    I would rather accept what is in the documentation:
    "If a SQL profile is recommended, the database tests the new profile by executing the SQL statement both with and without the profile. If the performance improvement improves at least threefold, then the database accepts the SQL profile, but only if the ACCEPT_SQL_PROFILES task parameter is set to TRUE. Otherwise, the automatic SQL tuning reports merely report the recommendation to create a SQL profile." Automatic SQL Tuning
    "If automatic implementation of SQL profiles is enabled (the default is disabled), then the database implements any SQL profiles that promise a great performance benefit. The implementation occurs at tuning time so that the database can immediately benefit from the new plan. You can enable or disable automatic implementation by using the SET_AUTO_TUNING_TASK_PARAMETER API to set the ACCEPT_SQL_PROFILES parameter." DBMS_AUTO_SQLTUNE

  • Concept Automatic Undo Tuning

    Hi all,
    yesterday we exported a large table with datapump. Unfortantly we received an ora-01555. As undo_mangement was set to auto and also undo_tablespace was big enough + autoextensible, I always thought, that Oracle would adjust undo_rentention as needed (longest query + 5 Min) even though rention was set to 900.
    Could anyone please put some light on the subject.
    Thanks in adavance

    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/undo002.htm#BJFFIACJ
    Did you export a table with LOB segments? If so that is the cause. Automatic tuning of undo retention is not supported for LOBs.
    Note:
    Automatic tuning of undo retention is not supported for LOBs. This is because undo information for LOBs is stored in the segment itself and not in the undo tablespace. >For LOBs, the database attempts to honor the minimum undo retention period specified by UNDO_RETENTION. However, if space becomes low, unexpired LOB undo >information may be overwritten.

  • Missing audio waveforms in GarageBand 10.0.1

    My GarageBand 10.0.1 does not create audio waveforms when I record. I can record and play back my voice, but I don't see any audio waveforms when I record or playback. I must be missing some really elemental step, but for the life of me I can't figure out what it is. I am trying to record my voice to create a podcast. I know the podcast template is no longer available, but I should be able to use "empty project" for this, correct?

    Phill85 wrote:
    It really doesn't give the same effect it used to "when called automatic tuning"??
    there are lots of changes in v10. if you want the same effects you had in v6, keep using it, installing v10 doesn't delete v6

  • About the auto tuning

    there are notes i write but struggle hitting
    the automatic tuning has never ( along with other things ) been explained as to how to do it
    do you first record the raw take
    then double click on it
    and then move the slider ?
    how do u save the altered loop /take?
    is it done automatically ? if you use the slider on it
    or
    do i first move the slider then record the loop
    very confusing
    like the flex timing issue
    thanks for your help

    First, I think the Garageband supplied auto-tuner is a simple implementation, so it's not going to give you the same quality a more professional ( = expensive) plugin will give you.
    But, it's not bad for fixing simple tuning issues.
    Just record the raw take. If you want to have GB "clean up" the tuning on the track, you move the "Automatic Tuning" slider for that track to the right. If it's at 0, there is no auto-tuning applied. Progressively larger values cause more aggressive correction. You can play with the slider to find a setting that helps fix your problem without having the whole track sound artificial. Also note, this slider control applies to the whole track , not just a region. So if you only want to auto-correct parts of your recording, you'll need to create separate tracks and split up the original region, and drag those particular bad regions into the new track, and apply the auto-tune to just the regions on that track.
    You don't save the altered loop, it's a real-time effect that gets applied when the track is played.

  • NOW LIVE: Oracle Database 11g - Performance Tuning Exam (1Z0-054)

    !http://blogs.oracle.com/certification/ORC-0128.jpg!
    The new *"Oracle Database 11g: Performance Tuning" certification exam (1Z0-054)* is now live, which is a single exam requirement for Oracle 11g DBA OCPs to earn the Oracle Database 11g Performance Tuning Certified Expert (OCE) certification.</p>
    <p align="justify">This certification endorses those database administrators, support engineers, and technical consultants who have demonstrated their knowledge and skills using Oracle Database 11g automatic tuning features, including SQL Tuning Advisor, SQL Access Advisor, Automatic Workload Repository and Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor.</p>
    <p align="justify">Candidates taking this exam at test centers will now receive their exam scores and pass/fail status immediately at the completion of their exam. Score reports have just been shipped to those candidates who participated in the beta period. If you participated in beta testing and did not yet receive your score report, please contact [email protected]</p>
    <p align="justify"><strong>QUICK LINKS</strong></p>
    <ul><li>Certification Track: Oracle Database 11g Performance Tuning Certified Expert (OCE)</li>
    <li>Certification Exam: 1Z0-054 &ndash; Oracle Database 11g: Performance Tuning</li>
    <li>Stay Up To Date: Oracle Certification Blog | Oracle Certification Website</li>
    </ul>

    Naveen Kumar C wrote:
    Hi,
    y
    I want to take the certification Oracle Database 11g: Performance Tuning exam 1Z0-054 and want to write the exam.
    To earn the OCE credentials, I know that we need to take training from Oracle University. I am not an OCP currently.
    Can I write the exam now and later take the course to meet the certification requirements? I know it is not the right way, but I can not pay $3000 for the course as of now. I can write the exam through self study. I want to check if I can take the exam now and later take the course.
    Is it mandatory to take the course before taking the exam?
    Thanks,
    naveen.Indeed you can take the exam now, and subsequently earn the 11g PERFTUNE OCE credential when you either:
    1) complete, submit and get verified the OU authorised 11g perftune course (possible but seems a little cart before horse).
    or
    2) Become 11g DBA OCP.

  • Vocal tuning

    I have a microphone going into my computer and I am recording my voice.  I see the reverb, echo and various options for changing the sound of my voice.  Is there an option to auto tune my voice so that it absolutely not flat.  I realize that it would help if I was a better singer but I'm just curious.
    Thanks for any help!

    surfher wrote:
    Is there an option to auto tune my voice
    open the Track Editor (Scissor icon) and use the Automatic Tuning slider

  • What is this SQL Tuning Advisor's Advice means

    HI ,
    I am Tuning a query wit hthe help of ORACLE 10 g 's SQL Tuning Advisor.I got the following recommendation .
    **Consider removing the disconnected table or view from this statement or add a join condition which refers to it.**
    I didn't understand what does this mean.
    Can anyone please help me
    Thanks,
    Pramod.
    Edited by: Pramod Garre on Jul 15, 2009 6:20 AM

    Simply saying if i apply that profile i will get Good plan.But I want to change the SQL itself rather than applying profile.in that case what can be done.Automatic SQL Tuning deals with this problem with its SQL Profiling capability. The Automatic Tuning Optimizer creates a profile of the SQL statement called a SQL Profile, consisting of auxiliary statistics specific to that statement. The query optimizer under normal mode makes estimates about cardinality, selectivity, and cost that can sometimes be off by a significant amount resulting in poor execution plans. SQL Profile addresses this problem by collecting additional information using sampling and partial execution techniques to verify and, if necessary, adjust these estimates.During SQL Profiling, the Automatic Tuning Optimizer also uses execution history information of the SQL statement to appropriately set optimizer parameter settings, such as changing the OPTIMIZER_MODE initialization parameter setting from ALL_ROWS to FIRST_ROWS for that SQL statement.
    If you want to change the SQL, You can re-write the SQL and evaluate the Performance recommendations SQL tuning Advisor.

  • How can i change the tempo of a track without changing pitch?

    I did this before but for the life of me can't figure out how i did it. Usually when I change the tempo (BPM), the recorded tracks sound warbly. But on some of my projects, this doesn't happen even though they're "real" sound recordings.
    Both projects are using Groove Fix and under "Pitch" I have "Follow tempo and pitch" checked off. Why is one project
    changing tempo seamlessly while the other project is warbling along? Automatic tuning is not the issue because neither project is enabled for that.
    Thanks,
    Steve

    The reason some files sound funny and others don't is because audio is handled a few different in Garageband depending on it's source (audio your recorded vs Apple Loops vs non Apple Loop pre recorded audio). Each of these have different color regions with different properties.  I just found this thread that might better explain it:
    http://hintsforums.macworld.com/archive/index.php/t-67538.html
    I hope that helps!

  • SOA-- Invoking OSB Service Getting Error :ORA-00084: global area must be PGA, SGA, or UGA

    Hello Friends,
    Really appreciate your help/inputs on the below Error Message encountered while running a Concurrent Program--using SOA:Same encountered in recently refreshed DEV instance, Can it be related to some Developement Instance Configuration related to SOA, as same working as expected in PROD.PLEASE ASSIST
    Need your inputs on the Error Message we are getting which Invoking OSB Service.
    "Error inside invoke_osb_service -> Error Code : -84Error Message :ORA-00084: global area must be PGA, SGA, or UGA "
    Can you please review and confirm if the same encountered before or assist on the same:
    XXFIN_AP_INVOICES_INT_IB_PKG.invoke_osb_service
    -- Define the SOAP request according the the definition of the web service being called
    l_soap_request := 
                '<?xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8"?>'
            || '<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:prox="http://OmnicareFinance/ProxyInput/">'
             ||   '<soapenv:Header/>'
             ||     '<soapenv:Body>'
             ||       '<prox:InboundProcess>'
             ||     '<Source_system>'||g_source_instance||'</Source_system>'
             ||     '<Run_mode>'||g_run_mode||'</Run_mode>'
             ||     '<Batch_key>'||g_batch_key||'</Batch_key>'
             ||     '<Request_id>'||g_request_id||'</Request_id>'
             ||     '<Invoice_Header_File_name>'||g_file_name||'</Invoice_Header_File_name>'
             ||     '<Invoice_Line_File_name>'||NULL||'</Invoice_Line_File_name>'
             ||     '<File_location>'||g_file_location||'</File_location>'
             ||       '</prox:InboundProcess>'
             ||     '</soapenv:Body>'
             ||   '</soapenv:Envelope>';
    Oracle Apps Log File
    -->Entering XXFIN_AP_INVOICES_INT_IB_PKG.invoke_osb_service
    -->   = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
    -->Response> status_code: "200"
    -->Response> reason_phrase: "OK"
    -->Response> http_version: "HTTP/1.1"
    -->Response From OSB: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soapenv:Header xmlns:prox="http://OmnicareFinance/ProxyInput/"/><soapenv:Body xmlns:prox="http://OmnicareFinance/ProxyInput/"><prox:InboundProcessResponse><status>E</status></prox:InboundProcessResponse></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
    -->OSB Response: E
    -->Error inside invoke_osb_service -> Error Code : -84Error Message :ORA-00084: global area must be PGA, SGA, or UGA
    -->   = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
    -->Entering XXFIN_AP_INVOICES_INT_IB_PKG.capture_error_info
    THANKS
    ANKUR

    Hi..
    >
    # symptom: ORA-00381: cannot use both new and old parameters for buffer cache size specification
    # cause: Both db_block_buffers and db_cache_size parameters are defined in the init.ora (instance parameter file). The db_block_buffers parameter has been deprecated and has been maintained only for backward compatibility. The db_cache_size parameter is one of the size parameters which defines the size of the cache for buffers. These parameters cannot be combined. Setting this along with the Dynamic SGA parameters errors out.
    >
    For sga_target refer to [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams193.htm#REFRN10256]
    which quotes
    >
    SGA_TARGET specifies the total size of all SGA components. If SGA_TARGET is specified, then the following memory pools are automatically sized:
    *Buffer cache (DB_CACHE_SIZE)
    * Shared pool (SHARED_POOL_SIZE)
    * Large pool (LARGE_POOL_SIZE)
    * Java pool (JAVA_POOL_SIZE)
    * Streams pool (STREAMS_POOL_SIZE)
    If these automatically tuned memory pools are set to non-zero values, then those values are used as minimum levels by Automatic Shared Memory Management. You would set minimum values if an application component needs a minimum amount of memory to function properly.
    >
    So, the what ever the value are set for the parameter will act as minimum value when sga_target is set.
    HTH
    Anand

  • The danger of memory target in Oracle 11g - request for discussion.

    Hello, everyone.
    This is not a question, but kind of request for discussion.
    I believe that many of you heard something about automatic memory management in Oracle 11g.
    The concept is that Oracle manages the target size of SGA and PGA. Yes, believe it or not, all we have to do is just to tell Oracle how much memory it can use.
    But I have a big concern on this. The optimizer takes the PGA size into consideration when calculating the cost of sort-related operations.
    So what would happen when Oracle dynamically changes the target size of PGA? Following is a simple demonstration of my concern.
    UKJA@ukja116> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    CORE    11.1.0.6.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    -- Configuration
    *.memory_target=350m
    *.memory_max_target=350m
    create table t1(c1 int, c2 char(100));
    create table t2(c1 int, c2 char(100));
    insert into t1 select level, level from dual connect by level <= 10000;
    insert into t2 select level, level from dual connect by level <= 10000;
    -- First 10053 trace
    alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever, level 1';
    select /*+ use_hash(t1 t2) */ count(*)
    from t1, t2
    where t1.c1 = t2.c1 and t1.c2 = t2.c2
    alter session set events '10053 trace name context off';
    -- Do aggressive hard parse to make Oracle dynamically change the size of memory segments.
    declare
      pat1     varchar2(1000);
      pat2     varchar2(1000);
      va       number;
      vc       sys_refcursor;
      vs        varchar2(1000);
    begin
      select ksppstvl into pat1
        from sys.xm$ksppi i, sys.xm$ksppcv v   -- views for x$ table
        where i.indx = v.indx
        and i.ksppinm = '__pga_aggregate_target';
      for idx in 1 .. 10000000 loop
        execute immediate 'select count(*) from t1 where rownum = ' || (idx+1)
              into va;
        if mod(idx, 1000) = 0 then
          sys.dbms_system.ksdwrt(2, idx || 'th execution');
          select ksppstvl into pat2
          from sys.xm$ksppi i, sys.xm$ksppcv v   -- views for x$ table
          where i.indx = v.indx
          and i.ksppinm = '__pga_aggregate_target';
          if pat1 <> pat2 then
            sys.dbms_system.ksdwrt(2, 'yep, I got it!');
            exit;
          end if;
        end if;
      end loop;
    end;
    -- As to alert log file,
    25000th execution
    26000th execution
    27000th execution
    28000th execution
    29000th execution
    30000th execution
    yep, I got it! <-- the pga target changed with 30000th hard parse
    -- Second 10053 trace for same query
    alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever, level 1';
    select /*+ use_hash(t1 t2) */ count(*)
    from t1, t2
    where t1.c1 = t2.c1 and t1.c2 = t2.c2
    alter session set events '10053 trace name context off';With above test case, I found that
    1. Oracle invalidates the query when internal pga aggregate size changes, which is quite natural.
    2. With changed pga aggregate size, Oracle recalculates the cost. These are excerpts from the both of the 10053 trace files.
    -- First 10053 trace file
    PARAMETERS USED BY THE OPTIMIZER
      PARAMETERS WITH ALTERED VALUES
    Compilation Environment Dump
    _smm_max_size                       = 11468 KB
    _smm_px_max_size                    = 28672 KB
    optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines    = false
    optimizer_use_invisible_indexes     = true
    -- Second 10053 trace file
    PARAMETERS USED BY THE OPTIMIZER
      PARAMETERS WITH ALTERED VALUES
    Compilation Environment Dump
    _smm_max_size                       = 13107 KB
    _smm_px_max_size                    = 32768 KB
    optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines    = false
    optimizer_use_invisible_indexes     = true
    Bug Fix Control Environment10053 trace file clearly says that Oracle recalculates the cost of the query with the change of internal pga aggregate target size. So, there is a great danger of unexpected plan change while Oracle dynamically controls the memory segments.
    I believe that this is a desinged behavior, but the negative side effect is not negligible.
    I just like to hear your opinions on this behavior.
    Do you think that this is acceptable? Or is this another great feature that nobody wants to use like automatic tuning advisor?
    ================================
    Dion Cho - Oracle Performance Storyteller
    http://dioncho.wordpress.com (english)
    http://ukja.tistory.com (korean)
    ================================

    I made a slight modification with my test case to have mixed workloads of hard parse and logical reads.
    *.memory_target=200m
    *.memory_max_target=200m
    create table t3(c1 int, c2 char(1000));
    insert into t3 select level, level from dual connect by level <= 50000;
    declare
      pat1     varchar2(1000);
      pat2     varchar2(1000);
      va       number;
    begin
      select ksppstvl into pat1
        from sys.xm$ksppi i, sys.xm$ksppcv v
        where i.indx = v.indx
        and i.ksppinm = '__pga_aggregate_target';
      for idx in 1 .. 1000000 loop
        -- try many patterns here!
        execute immediate 'select count(*) from t3 where 10 = mod('||idx||',10)+1' into va;
        if mod(idx, 100) = 0 then
          sys.dbms_system.ksdwrt(2, idx || 'th execution');
          for p in (select ksppinm, ksppstvl
              from sys.xm$ksppi i, sys.xm$ksppcv v
              where i.indx = v.indx
              and i.ksppinm in ('__shared_pool_size', '__db_cache_size', '__pga_aggregate_target')) loop
              sys.dbms_system.ksdwrt(2, p.ksppinm || ' = ' || p.ksppstvl);
          end loop;
          select ksppstvl into pat2
          from sys.xm$ksppi i, sys.xm$ksppcv v
          where i.indx = v.indx
          and i.ksppinm = '__pga_aggregate_target';
          if pat1 <> pat2 then
            sys.dbms_system.ksdwrt(2, 'yep, I got it! pat1=' || pat1 ||', pat2='||pat2);
            exit;
          end if;
        end if;
      end loop;
    end;
    /This test case showed expected and reasonable result, like following:
    100th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 92274688
    __db_cache_size = 16777216
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    200th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 92274688
    __db_cache_size = 16777216
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    300th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 88080384
    __db_cache_size = 20971520
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    400th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 92274688
    __db_cache_size = 16777216
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    500th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 88080384
    __db_cache_size = 20971520
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    1100th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 92274688
    __db_cache_size = 20971520
    __pga_aggregate_target = 83886080
    1200th execution
    __shared_pool_size = 92274688
    __db_cache_size = 37748736
    __pga_aggregate_target = 58720256
    yep, I got it! pat1=83886080, pat2=58720256Oracle continued being bounced between shared pool and buffer cache size, and about 1200th execution Oracle suddenly stole some memory from PGA target area to increase db cache size.
    (I'm still in dark age on this automatic memory target management of 11g. More research in need!)
    I think that this is very clear and natural behavior. I just want to point out that this would result in unwanted catastrophe under special cases, especially with some logic holes and bugs.
    ================================
    Dion Cho - Oracle Performance Storyteller
    http://dioncho.wordpress.com (english)
    http://ukja.tistory.com (korean)
    ================================

  • Releasing Cloned Blocks

    While investigating a severe performance issue of buffer busy waits and latch free - cache buffer chains, I noticed that for a particular 1-row table with the majority of the BBW, there was a large number of cloned blocks. (same latch, many entries w/ touch count=1). I also noticed that fairly quickly after the wait contention subsided, that the number of tcn=1 blocks were basically gone.
    Is there a function/command/etc. that I could force/"request" Oracle cleanup up any cloned blocks no longer being used?

    metalink document suggests Bug 5387030: AUTOMATIC TUNING OF UNDO_RETENTION CAUSING SPACE PROBLEMS, as per the documents there are 3 workarounds & one of them I opted for was Set the autoextend and maxsize attribute of each datafile in the undo ts so it is autoextensible and its maxsize is equal to its current size so the undo tablespace now has the autoextend attribute but does not autoend:
    alter database datafile '<datafile_flename>' autoextend on maxsize <current_size>;
    With this setting, v$undostat.tuned_undoretention is not calculated based on a percentage of the undo tablespace size, instead v$undostat.tuned_undoretention is set to the maximum of: maxquerylen secs + 300 undo_retention specified in init.ora
    As I monitor the undo tablespace, the same query now returns
    SQL> select sum(bytes)/1024/1024/1024 Gb, status from dba_undo_extents group by status;
    GB STATUS
    42.399292 EXPIRED
    .0625 ACTIVE
    SQL> select begin_time, end_time, undoblks, tuned_undoretention, maxquerylen from v$undostat ;
    this is a partial output
    BEGIN_TIM END_TIME UNDOBLKS T UNED_UNDORETENTION MAXQUERYLEN
    11-APR- 11 11-APR-11 4 900 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 9 900 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 11 900 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 7 900 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 106 900 0
    previously the same query had given different values for tuned_undoretention
    SQL> select begin_time, end_time, undoblks, tuned_undoretention, maxquerylen, maxqueryid from v$undostat;
    BEGIN_TIM END_TIME UNDOBLKS TUNED_UNDORETENTION MAXQUERYLEN
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 1 900 0
    *11-APR-11 11-APR-11 1 900 0--------------------> This is where the workaround started to effect*
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 3580 345600 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 1 345600 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 40 345600 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 1 345600 0
    11-APR-11 11-APR-11 1 345600 0
    Any suggestions on how the tuned_undoretention works?

  • SGA_TARGET question

    Oracle's 10.2 documentations states the following about SGA_TARGET.
    SGA_TARGET specifies the total size of all SGA components. If SGA_TARGET is specified, then the following memory pools are automatically sized:
    Buffer cache (DB_CACHE_SIZE)
    Shared pool (SHARED_POOL_SIZE)
    Large pool (LARGE_POOL_SIZE)
    Java pool (JAVA_POOL_SIZE)
    Streams pool (STREAMS_POOL_SIZE)
    If these automatically tuned memory pools are set to non-zero values, then those values are used as minimum levels by Automatic Shared Memory Management. You would set minimum values if an application component needs a minimum amount of memory to function properly.
    The following pools are manually sized components and are not affected by Automatic Shared Memory Management:
    Log buffer
    Other buffer caches, such as KEEP, RECYCLE, and other block sizes
    Fixed SGA and other internal allocations
    The memory allocated to these pools is deducted from the total available for SGA_TARGET when Automatic Shared Memory Management computes the values of the automatically tuned memory pools.
    Under the area that illustrates what is not affected by ASMM it has "Fixed SGA and other internal allocations".
    Can anyone tell me exactly what these are??

    Find your answer in this metalink doc
    How to determine SGA Size (7.x, 8.x, 9.x, 10g)
    Doc ID: Note:1008866.6

Maybe you are looking for