HW perfomance

I have a G5 which unfortunately is slowly pigeon holing me due to lack of PPC software going forward.
Been think of getting a MacBook Pro, but have no clue what kind of HW requirements I will be up against. If anyone has experiences they can share with respect to using Logic Pro on a Macbook or Macbook Pro and would like to share, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Ted

It performs better than it will on your G5...
I don't really want to write a massive post about my laptop experiences and how I work. If you have any concerns, I'm happy to try and address them. If you just want to know whether running Logic on a laptop is fine, then yes it's fine, subject to the usual rules about expandability (you can't put 4 hard drives in the thing, you can't use PCI cards, you can't run three monitors etc).
if you want to know whether you can use multi-gigabyte massive orchestral and Tv sound design projects using hundreds of tracks and instruments and massive samples, I'd say a laptop is not exactly the machine best suited to the task - get a high-end Mac Pro system for that.
But it's perfectly capable of running decent projects, depending on your requirements, of which I have no idea...

Similar Messages

'This file does not have a program associated with it for perfoming this action'?

'This file does not have a program associated with it for perfoming this action. Please install a program or, if one is already installed, create an association in the Default Programs control panel". Any help? This error message has never come up before. I have tried to open the page on 3 different devices but the same error message. All help is greatly appreciated as I need to print the page out for my course I am doing. Thanks all.

You get this when doing what? Can you post a link to the page that gives you this message?

F1 Help Perfomance Assistant not working - ITS SAP GUI HTML

Hi All,
when using a Transaction in SAP Portal i like to use the F1 Help. Transaction is displayed by ITS SAP GUI HTML. I have the option to display the Help in:
- Modal Window <-- this works
- Performance Assistant <-- not working
When pressing F1 an error message appears saying: "Expression_not_Num" while using the perfomance assistant.
- Is there a configuration missing? Is something not installed?
- Can i change the default personalization setting for help for all users to modal window?
Any ideas?
Regards
M. Stanka

Hi Michael Stanka ,
i got same issue from last week onwards.. If press F1 ,it displays like "Page cant be displayed". I searched in forums also but i couldnt get clear point. U posted ur issue was resolved.. Could u plz provide the steps how to solve?? My mobile no:09566855978(India-Chennai)

Poor perfomance CORBA and EJB in Oracle 8i

Here are the perfomance results of methods invocations
(1000 invocations of empty method in an loop)
Oracle 8i CORBA ~100ms per method
Oracle 8i EJB ~100ms per method
Jonas EJB server ~5ms per method
Java RMI ~3ms per method
Why Oracle 8i is so slow, even compared with noncommercial
EJB server Jonas? Is there any way to speed this up? Source codes of perfomance testing programs available upon request.

Oracle Jserver is quite fast and scalable. Nevertheless, there exists an important overhead in calling a CORBA or EJB method, so you should desing "heavy" functions in your EJB/CORBA objects. Instead of calling 10 times little methods, call one time a hevay one, and you'll find that JServer perforns very fast and reliably.
Best regards

Fetching materials on basis of Division creating perfomance problem

Hi Experts,
i am fetching Data from three table like
select a~matnr a~extwg
b~charg b~werks b~clabs b~cspem b~cinsm
c~vfdat
from mara as a join mchb as b
on a~matnr = b~matnr join mch1 as c on b~matnr = c~matnr and b~charg = c~charg
into table itab_main
where a~spart = p_spart and b~werks = p_werks
and b~lgort = 'FG01' .
it is creating perfomance problem
so my questin is 'is there any index table for mara ?(like vrpma for vbak)'
so we can get all the material on base of division fast.
Regards,
Alpesh
Edited by: Alpesh on Jun 2, 2009 3:56 PM

Hi Alpesh,
How about throwing MARC into the mix. I notice that you are searching with plant, storage location and division. Table MARC has an index on plant named WRK.
If you join MARA and MARC to first determine all the materials that qualify for the given plant and division combination, you can access table MCHB with material (MARA-MATNR), plant (MARC-WERKS) and storage location (FG01) i.e. the first 4 fields in the primary key of table MCHB.
I could not test this theory out because in our system we do not have any data in table MCHB. Your select executes quickly on my system.
Please let me know how this panned out.

Perfomance problem with java stored procedure

hi,
i developped a java class, then I stored it in Oracle 8.1.7.
This class contains several import of other classes stored in the database.
It works, but the execution perfomances are disappointing. It's very long. I guess, that's because of the great number of classes to load that are necessary for my class execution.
I tried to increase the size of the java pool (I parameter 70 Mo in the java_pool_size parameter of the init.ora), but the performance is not much better.
Has anyone an idea to increase the performance of this execution of my class ?
In particular, is there a way to keep permanently in memory the java objects used by my class ?
Thanks in advance
bye
[email protected]
null

Hello again,
I read the documentation of 9i and found some hints about different TCP/IP socket handling of 9i and a standard JVM.
There are some parts that give hints but I couldn't find a sample code to show how to handle the differences.
Could anyone tell me how to handle the differences or give some links to sample code?
Thanks
Detlev

Help me regards perfomance:java.util.concurrent.Executors

hi friends,
I implemented the concurrent.Executors in my project. to tell my problem consider a program that insert 1000 data into oracle database.
instead of inserting 1000 data as a single operations i created 5 threads using the concurrent API. and inserted 200 records per thread.
when i analyse the time(in miliseconds) i got the following result,
insert the 1000 records through a single thread thks 200 ms.
when i use 5 threads it taks atlease 200 ms to a single thread.
so every threads finished it in 200 or 210 ms. so both perfomance is equal.
Buy i want to run the each thread in 200/5. time. then my perfomance will be improved.
Can anybody help me.
With regards Prince

i think eventhough i use the seperate connection i
got some lock on some object when my Statement(not
PreparedStatement) executes the query(by some other
threads) so all the threads taks almost same time to
finish like ordinary operation. is't it. i want to
speadup the operation. Three threads doing the same stuff taking five turns each:
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Notice something? They all start and end at the same time.
because in my company i am doing the process with
80000 data. i taks 1 hour to complete all tasks. how
can i minimize the time by using the threads?Find the bottleneck first.

Change pointer perfomance issue(bd22)

Hi,
we are using message type HRMD_A to transfer the employee change data using the program RBDMIDOC. we are checking two table BDCP n BDCPS, but because of large number of data we r facing a perfomance issue here. I read in one forum about transaction BD22 which deletes the change pointer from these tables, but is it safe to use? and also what is the obsolete change pointer?
Thanks in advance for ur inputs.

Hey,
It is advisable to reorganize change pointer tables at regular intervals for better performance of programs accessing the BDCP* tables.
BD22 is a standard report delivered by SAP and it is absolutely safe to run this report. It also has o test run option. You could always run the report in test mode to analyze the data the report had selected for deletion.
Obsolete change pointers are those which have been created up to the specified date and time. In BD22, if this checkbox is marked, obsolete change pointers will be reorganized regardless of whether they have yet been processed.
Processed change pointers are those which have been processed in the specified period (date and time). If this checkbox is marked, the processed change pointers are reorganized.
-Kiran
*Please mark useful answers

How to improve perfomance in database operations

In my programme i do some select, insert operations many time. so when i run my program with atlease 80000 customer data it takes 1 hrs to complete the task.
So i switched to use threads. So i use n number of threads and gave a new connection to each thread and splited my customer data for each threads. so each thread contain 80000/n data.
when i check the perfomance both (with and without thread) are equal
so help me to improve the perfomance :)

s friend. most of the time it invokes the database operations. i use addbatchs to execute the code. wait i will give the timelines,
:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2---- is the time to execute the query
:pool-1-thread-1:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-1---- is the time to run a thread
with 1 thread
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 62
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 0
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-1 ::: 94
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 63
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 31
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-1 ::: 125
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 63
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 0
01/04/07 10-33:pool-1-thread-1:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-1 ::: 109
with 5 threads[
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-3:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 125
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 125
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-2:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 62
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-2:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-2 ::: 266
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-4:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 32
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-3:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 63
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-1:AbstractRuleBasedScenario:run:test2 Time:::: 47
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-4:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-4 ::: 281
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-3:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-3 ::: 312
01/04/07 10-29:pool-1-thread-1:KYCScenarioTask:call:pool-1-thread-1 ::: 250

How to improve sql perfomance/access speed by altering session parameters

Dear friends
how to improve sql perfomance/access speed by altering the session parameters? without altering indexes & sql expression
regrads
Edited by: sak on Mar 14, 2011 2:10 PM
Edited by: sak on Mar 14, 2011 2:43 PM

One can try:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:3696883368520
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:5180609822543
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/memory.htm#sthref497
But make sure you understand the caveats you can run into!
It would be better to post the outcome of select * from v$version; first.
Also and execution plan would be nice to see.
See:
When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

View is affecting the perfomance

Hi all,
I have a query that retrives the data from two views.
SELECT
DISTINCT
di.emp_name,
di.age,
di.department
FROM
data.v_employee di
JOIN
data.v_role r USING (emp_id)
WHERE
r.roll_name = 'manager' AND
di.age='50' AND
di.experience >20
r.supervisor is null;
This query is taking more time to execute.when i am executing this views with inputs individualy, the query is running too fast,but when joining the two views the query takes more than 30 minutes some times results not coming while an hour.
I am not supposed to change the views for perfomance.the only option i have to make this query faster with out changing the views.
Does an optimizer hints will we works for the view select query to improve perfomance?
Is there any other way to re write query that improve perfomance.
Please help to understand the view perfomance in a select query.
Thanks in advance for your response.
Regards,
Senthur

HOW To Make TUNING request
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
NOTHING forces you to actually use either VIEW

SQL Developer 1.1.0.23.64 on Mac OSX 10.4.8 - very very bad perfomance.

Hello!
I just downloaded SQL Developer 1.1.0.23.64 and I'm wondered by its inappropriately bad perfomance. "Tables" and "Views" node can't be opened, and simple (very simple) query "select * from dual" executes 15 to 30 seconds. Can it be worked around in any way? Oracle versions are 10g and 9i - looks like it works the same bad way on both of them.

I have 1.25Gb operating memory, jdk 1.5.0_06 (latest Mac JDK). I do not have neither sql*plus nor oracle client installed (and there are no such requirements in the installation guide) - everything works fine and fast enough with JDBC drivers in SQL4X as well as in projects being under development. I'm using JDBC drivers from ojdbc14.jar. The only program that very slow in SQL execution is SQL Developer, unfortunately...

Perfomance of HW for eBS 12.1.3 & DB 11.2.0.2

Hi,
we are configuring servers (CPU's, core, RAM,..) for using by eBS 12.1.3 (fresh install) (2 servers with all application services) and DB 11gR2 (an unique server like DB server). I have reviewed various notes and documents about issue but I don't find information about perfomance of eBS and DB by resources of servers.
So, my questions are:
1.- What type of HW resources consume a EBS 12.1.3 with Db 11gR2? I refer CPU's, core, threads, RAM, Processor speed (Mhz), ...
2.- If I want a HW good perfomance, how should I configure my servers (more CPUs, more core's, more Threads, more RAM,..)?
My objective is to evaluate perfomance/scalability/price of serverS because if eBS & DB consume more RAm than CPU perhaps we need to buy servers with more RAM and less CPU...
Appologies if I have opened this thread associated an incorrect forum ...
Best Regards,
Ricardo

Please see these links.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Performance+AND+Tuning&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Hardware+AND+Sizing&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Hardware+AND+Specification&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Benchmark&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Perfomance Monitoring on R/3

Hi All,
We have a System and SAP version is R/3 Enterprise and its on Oracle 9.2.0.7 and AIX 5.3. There are Perfomance issues with the System and its responding Slowly.
I have checked ST03 and Dialog response time is 1000, which is good as per our standard of Rating, i checked in ST04 and see that the Hit ratio for All the Buffers is 99% But there are lot of Swaps happening in the System. I checked SM50 and see that Almost all the Work processes are free. Is there anything in Specific which you look when ur trying to analyze the bottle Necks .
Regards,
Ershad Ahmed.

hi Ershad,
First you have to stop and start the database. swaps will be lost, othersise you have to increase your rolling and paging area memory size using rdisp/ parameters. in rz10, rz11.
with regards,
Harish Reddy

Perfomance Issue after Database Upgrade in 11i

Hi All,
We upgraded database from 9.2.0.5 to 10.2.0.4, the system was running fine. One month after upgrade we changed the compatibility from 9.2.0 to 10.2.0 for compatibilty and optimizers. Since then perfomance is poor for self service and PTO carry over is taking more then 10 hours, earlier which completes in 1:15 min to 1:30 min. I logged a SR and following with Oracle Support.
Are there any _"Best Practices"_ to be followed after database upgrade from 9i to 10g in 11.5.10.2.
All the database parameters has been set as recommeded by metalink note:216205.1
How frequently gather schema statistics should be run on production?
Thnaks in Advance for help.

Are there any _"Best Practices"_ to be followed after database upgrade from 9i to 10g in 11.5.10.2.
All the database parameters has been set as recommended by metalink note:216205.1
The best practice is to adjust initialization parameters as per the note referenced above.
In addition, review the following note carefully:
Note: 744143.1 - Tuning performance on eBusiness suite
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=744143.1
How frequently gather schema statistics should be run on production?Note: 168136.1 - How Often Should Gather Schema Statistics Program be Run?
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=168136.1

SELECT FROM AUSP perfomance improvement

Hi!
Generally speaking our problem is long runtimes for transactions dealing with configuration (CU50, VA01/VA02/VA03).
ABAP runtime analysis (SE30) and performance trace analysis (ST05) clearly show that 85% percents of total execution time is spent on single SELECT statement of standard FM (CLSE_SELECT_AUSP), which is called many thousands of times:
          select * from ausp appending table x_ausp
                             for all entries in ix_objek
                 where objek eq ix_objek-low
                 and   mafid in ix1_mafid
                 and   klart eq klart
                 and   atwrt in x_wertc
                 and   atflv in x_wertn
                 and   atcod in ix1_atcod
                 and   datuv <= key_date.
In spite of database specific request always looks like:
SELECT * FROM AUSP
WHERE MANDT = :A0
AND "OBJEK" = :A1
AND "MAFID" = :A2
AND "KLART" = :A3
AND "DATUV" <= :A4
and access is done based on index AUSP~N3 range scan we have an unacceptable runtimes.
Can anybody suggest any perfomance tuning? We tried to create custom index based only on fileds from previous select, but improvment is too small. Is it possible to activate some type of table buffering for AUSP? Any help appreciated.
Regards,
Maxim.

Hello Maxim,
Are the database statistics up to date for this table ?
You can do this using program RSANAORA (if you have an oracle database). This should ensure you the right index is chosen. You might want to check with your BC people first, as this is normally their job.
kind regards
Pieter

HW perfomance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for