I/C Vendor Invoice (KI) posting to multiple accounts?

Dear All.
We'd like to be able to post the results of the IV billing line item to multiple accounts based on the conditions and account determination in the IV document.  No problem on this part.
The challenge is on the I/C Vendor invoice posting.  Looks like you can only post to one G/L account as defined via the setup in OBCB.
We did also turn on the "Item surch./disc." in OBCE.  However, it now posts the amounts in the line item separately but still to the same G/L account defined in OBCB.  It looks like once you turn on "Item surch./disc.", the condition values just inherit the G/L account of the line item.
It doesn't look like you can define a seperate "EDI:  Goods/services number" for each G/L account to post to in OBCB?  Hoping I'm wrong and missed something though?
Otherwise, we're investigating a couple of user-exits that look like it will let us do this.
exit_sapliedi_101 & exit_sapliedi_102 both contain the idoc data as well as the document date (beleg_daten) for FB01.
Looks a little tricky though.
There's a couple of OSS notes that seem like they suggest this as well, but they also look like they've been posted many years ago.
Just wanted to double check with others to see if there was a standard or better method of doing this before going forward?
Many Thanks!

Dear Devon,
I face the same issue. Could you please explain in a bit more detail where in OBCB you used the +**** where **** is the SD billing document condition type ?
Is it in the goods/Services ID text field (V_T076I-WLTXT)?
Thank you very much!

Similar Messages

  • SAP Workflow for vendor invoice is posting into past?

    Dear experts
    I have a heavy problems with the workflow for vendor invoices. The following example demonstrates it:
    I have created a vendor invoice on 1st of December 2011.The responsible person has checked and released this invoice on 3rd January 2012. In Customizing it is setup that posting date will be overwritten with system date.
    Does anybody has an idea why it is not posted in January 2012?
    What does the workflow? It is posting that invoice with posting date 1st December 2011 not with 3rd January. If I have a closer look into the head of the SAP document the following parameters are shown: document date: 1st December, posting date: 1st December, entry date: 3rd January.
    Does anybody has an idea why entry date is 3rd January?
    Thanks in advance
    Udo

    Dear expert
          It is not standard behavior for the posting date to overwrite the document date - at least its not something that I've ever come across. I'm wondering if there is a custom substitution on your system that is overwriting the document date . Check t-code OBBH. The substitution is most likely at the document header level.
    Regards
       Ajeesh.s

  • Vendor Invoice Wrongly posted- options available

    Vendor invoices has been wrongly posted to another vendor .What are the options available to correct the same
    1.FB05 Post with clearing
    2.F-51-Transfer from one vendor to another
    3.Reset the invoice and redo it
    4.Go for F-03 Manual clearing and through FB50 go for a G.L Posting
    Please advice me whether all the above can be applied
    Thanks
    Nagendra Prasad BS

    Hi ,
    IF this is coming from MM  and not paid then please reverse in MR8M and maunal clear FI docuemnt F-44 this will open PO again for posting correct Invoice .
    if this one is mm and paid invoice then raise a credit note to the wrong vendor and Post invoice on correct vendor .
    Same you can do for ONo PO - FI docuemnt . Reverse the Invoice in FB08 and  clear in FBRA  if invoice is not paid . then Pst correct invoice in Fb60 to correct vendor .
    IF invoice is paid to wrong vendor then raise a credit note and post the correct invoice to correct vendor .
    many Thanks .

  • BADI for Vendor Invoice after Posting to send a mail to vendor

    Hi,
    My requirement Is like this.
    I have to send a mail to vendor after the Invoice for vendor is Posted.
    For dat I am searching for a badi to implement after the invoice is successfully posted.
    Please give some solution about this.
    Regards,
    Jyoti..

    if it is F-43 . check out the following
    BAdI Definition      Description                                                                               
    AC_QUANTITY_GET      Transfer of Quantities to Accounting - Customer Exit       
    BADI_ENJ_ALT_ADR     Go to alternative vendor/customer data                     
    BADI_F040_SCREEN_600 Screen Enhancement on F040 0600 Document Header            
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01   Screen Enhancement 1 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02   Screen Enhancement 2 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS03   Screen Enhancement 3 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04   Screen Enhancement 4 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS05   Screen Enhancement 5 on FDCB Basic Data Screen (010, 510)  
    BADI_PRKNG_NO_UPDATE BAdI for Deactivating Update of Parked Documents           
    F050S008             FIDCC1, FIDCC2 Inbound IDoc: Update Comparison Ledger      
    FBAS_CIN_LTAX1F02    Tax interface                                              
    FBAS_CIN_MF05AFA0    EWT - Downpayment Clearing - Tax transfer for CIN          
    FI_AUTHORITY_ITEM    Extended Authorization Check for Document Display (FB03)   
    FI_GET_INV_PYMT_AMT  BAdI for determining the payment amount for an invoice     
    FI_HEADER_SUB_1300   Screen Enhancement for Document Header SAPMF05A            
    FI_PAYREF_BADI_010   BAdI: Payment Reference Number                             
    FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE Derive BKPF-WWERT from Other Document Header Data          
    INVOIC_FI_INBOUND    BADIs for Inbound IDoc INVOIC FI (Vendor Invoice)          
    RFESR000_BADI_001    BAdI for Own Processing of POR Item                        
    otherwise - find out the package of the program of the transaction.
    go to se84 - enhancements- business add ins - definitions - enter package and execute - you will see all the definations.

  • How to release Parked vendor invoice to post

    Hi Gurus,
    We have checked posting release box in obwa so system trigger workflow. We want to use park and post for FV50 and FV60 both. But we dont want automated mails for FV60.
    Now whats happening is that system is working fine for FV50 and generating mails for posting of document. But System is not allowing to post parked vendor invoice and saying it is not released. Can you please tell me what settings reqiured to release parked vendor and how to post it????
    Thank You

    Hi Mohit
    Thanks for raising this query. It helped me to learn new things today. As far as your issue is concerned, I think it can be done by implementing BTE only and not through standard SAP configurations.
    Check the link below on the basis of which I drew my conclusions as above
    Probelm with configuration in OBWA/OBWJ | SCN
    Get help of ABAP or Workflow consultant to implement to meet your requirement too.
    Hope it helps
    Regards
    Mustafa

  • Inbound idoc failure(vendor invoice not posted)

    Hi All,
    we have two SAP systems. SAP A and SAP B.
    SAP A is the vendor for SAP B system we have created a sales order/delivery/out bound invoice in SAP A system.The sales order has BOM material with main item and sub items. We have the same material master data and BOM master data in system A and system B since we are following split architecture.
    The outbound invoice(with main and sub item) in system A has generated an outbound idoc and the idoc has gone to SAP
    system B. There are the usual segments like E1EDP01 for main item and another E1EDp01 for the sub itmes in the outbound
    idoc.The message type is INVOIC and basic type INVOIC02 with no extension.
    In system B, the inbound idoc (coming from system A) has failed giving the error message "higher level items not allowed". The
    segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red ! basically the inbound idoc in sap system B is posting a vendor
    invoice since the inbound idoc in B is calling the FM IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM... I think this is doing vendor invoice
    verification.
    I have checked in system A, all is ok and the outbound idoc is ok but the issue is in sap system B, the inbound idoc has failed
    with message "higher level items not allowed". The segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red in inbound idoc in
    system B. The segments are the same for inbound idoc in B and outbound idoc in A.
    Can someone pls tell what is wrong in system B.(config or data issue) as we are managing both systems.
    regds

    Hi,
    I am not sure if we can send both main  and sub items thorugh inbound invocie idoc to create vendor invoice.
    you can try to post the idoc by removing main items from the IDoc in WE19.
    one more thing you should aware is you are not allowed to to create two E1EDP01 segements for the same PO item(E1EDP02).
    check this as well.
    Regds,

  • Invoice transport costs with multiple account assignment

    Hello Gurus,
    My problem is the following:
    1) I create two sales orders with the same forwarding agent "A"
    2) I create the two deliveries with the forwarding agent "A"
    3) I create a transport for those two deliveries and the same forwarding agent A
    4) I create the shipment cost for that transport.
    So now we have the situation:
    2 orders --> 2 deliveries --> 1 transport --> 1 shipment cost
    when i go to transaction MIRO and I enter the delivery note number I get one line item with the total transport cost.
    If I click on the option "Multiple account assignment" I get a breakdown of all the amounts but I can not see which costs refers to which delivery.
    My question is: Is there any way I can link the amount to the delivery number or at least to identify which cost is linked to which delivery number?
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Miguel

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • Proces order variance settlement posting to multiple accounts in FI

    Dear,
    Settlement of process order variance is controlled via GBB - AUA, where a different account can be used by valuation class. Our requirement is to post on a different account by variance category though. Any idea wheher this is possible / which user-exit?
    txs, Koen De Groote

    Hello
    It is not possible to post the variances to different GL accounts. However for analysis you can take the different variances to different COPA value fields.
    Sangram

  • Vendor Invoice Post Simulation

    Hi, We have a requirement to create a program that simulates posting of vendor invoices (the posting is done thru BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE).  The users need to review results before actually posting the invoice. How can we do this? Is there a BAPI that simulates posting of vendor invoices?
    Zack

    You can get all the documents which are simulated in the tables VBKPF and VBSEGK. Basically all parked invocie docs are stored in this tables. You can write a small program to retrieve all simulated invoices from this 2 tables.
    If you want function modules then try to put *PARKED* in SE37 and search you will even get fm of your requirement.
    Regards
    Venk@

  • Consignment Vendor Invoice Amount Adjustment

    Dear All,
    Normally in SAP, The vendor invoices for consignment in purchasing is posted from MRKO. There is no invoice posting from MIRO.
    In MRKO, after entering the selection details, we choose SETTLE for processing type, then we run it and vendor invoice is posted.
    So I wonder how can our client make some adjustments for very small differences in the price ? Because normally there may be some differences like 0,50 EUR because of the roundings. So how will these difference amounts will be posted ?
    Thx in advance

    Hi,
    MR11 shows the amount for GI/IR account if there is any.. But in consignment case.. you put the price to inforecord, then withdrawals occur. According to these withdrawals you settle the vendor invoice. But the price is already captured from the inforecord.  When you settle it, SAP assumes the price as the inforecord price. That is ok. But because of the roundings (because it is only two digit after comma) the real vendor invoice may be different like 0,50 eur (for example you posted 300 EUR, but real invoice is 300,50 EUR)
    This happens very frequently for our customer. So MR11 is useless for that case. There shall be some other trx to make these differences to be posted. So how will the 0,50 EUR posted ? This 0,50 eur will not appear in MR11

  • Vendor Invoice Without FI Postings / Pro Forma Invoice

    Is there any possibility to post vendor invoices without doing the FI postings?
    Vendor invoices are posted automatically through an interface to a legacy system. Is there any interaction chance, like userexit etc. in posting to avoid FI postings?
    Thanks in advance for a fast feedback, S.

    I meant I want to create the logistical document vendor invoice, but without posting anything to FI accounts. I know that it is not as easy as in SD, where you can really influence the assigned accounts.
    It also would help, when I get an idea how to use different accounts than for normal vendor invoice.
    Thanks, S.

  • FB60 vendor invoice

    FB60 vendor invoice
    Transaction : posting a vendor invoice and offsetting entry is a G/L expense account
    When i enter equal amounts (invoice amount and g/l amount) i am getting an error saying balance not zero
    But i varied the amount it is letting me post
    ex 5300 as invoice amount and 5000 as g/l amount
    Why is this so?
    Points promised
    Prashanth

    Hi,
    WHT has 2 types – a. Accrual basis  b. Payment Basis
    Path: IMG – FA-Fin GS – WHT-Extended WHT
    1.     Basic Settings
    a.     Check WHT countries: Check ur country
    b.     Calculation
    i.     Withholding tax type – Define WHT type for invoice posting: Give ur country, tax type, Base Amt – Select Gross amount à Save
    ii.     WHT Type – Define WHT for payment posting – Similar to 1bi
    iii.     WHT Code  - Country, WHT type, Base Amoutn: 100%, Post Indicator: 1: Std posting, Calculate: WHT Rate: Give ur tax rate.  Similarly do for payment posting
    c.     Define formula for calculating WHT-Give basic details and enter other details by double clicking ‘Formula for calculating WHT’.  Do for both Accrual and payment
    d.     Company code – Assign WHT to cocode – Do for both payment and accrual
    e.     Activate Extended WHT
    2.     Posting: Accoutns for WHT – Define accouts for WHT – Give chart of acct – Select WHT code and Type.  Give the type and code of both accrual n opayment
    3.     IMG-Logistics General – Tax on Goods movement – India – basic settings – Maintain Cocd settings – Give first month and save
    4.     Attach the WHT to Vendor Master (FK02 – change; FKO1 –Create) – Select WHT; Tax type: Either payment/accrual; Select Liable and save
    5.     Try posting entry thru F-43 and enter the WHT. Document àSimulate
    The above is the configuration for Extended WT
    Regards,
    Sridevi
    <b>* Pls. assign points, if useful</b>

  • Multiple account assignment in invoicing plan

    We are using Invoicing plan and activated multiple account assignment in the "account assignment category config". in ECC 6.0
    Following are the scenarios and issues.
    1. An invoice is posted through MRIS (Invoicing Plan Settlement) with one account assignment only.--- the systems posts the invoices correctly.
    2. Change account assignment to multiple lines .e.g. two GL accounts with 60% and 40% -- Upon running MRIS, The system posts invoices 80% and 20%.
    3. Continue next period with MRIS, and the system posts correctly i.e 60% and 40% as per PO .
    4. If the account assignment is not changed there after, the system posts correctly.
    We  found in the debug mode the system calculates the split by way of taking into account the values in the PO history, and the previous items in the invoicing plan.
    Is there any way we can achive the desired split account after the first invoice is posted with single account assignmetn?
    p.s. If we split the account assignment prior to the first invoice is posted, there is no issue.

    B.K.
    I need the user exit in the SES no in the PO.
    Thanks,
    CD

  • Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?

    Good morning Guru,
    What is the difference between  "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification"  in MM module ?
    I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
    Thank's

    Hi
    Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
    In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
    Hope it is clear.
    Regards,
    K Lakshmanan

  • Multiple Account Assignment At Invoicing

    Dear Guru's
    Is it possible to use a purchase order without account assignment at invoicing and assigning multiple accounts at that point.

    it wont be possible to do it at invoice stage. coz in multiple account assignment scenario, GR will be non valauated, and unless you specify an account assignment in PO, you cannot valulate it for mutiple acount assignments at IV.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need help with creation of Payment Cycles

    We need you to determine a way to sum up the Measure "Prod Matl - Std" into Payment Cycles of the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th of each month. Company only pays suppliers on the Payment Cycles indicated above. General Rules:                   

  • What do I need to do to pass on my old iPad to another person?

    i have an old iPad I'd like to give or sell to someone else, but it sounds like ios 7 makes doing this complicated.  So does apple have a list of steps that I must do so that I can pass on my iPad ( or iphone) to someone else?  can someone give me th

  • Error in compiling and running a packaged application

    Hi all, I am new to java and studying alone java from sun's site.Now i am going through sun's step by step programming.From there i got a packaged Application named DiveLog which i wrote and saved in divelog directory in jdk1.2.2which is in C directo

  • Problems to delete Rows

    Hi, i want to delete all rows in a table which will be automaticlly updatet in a thread. the problem is that i get somtimes the message 9>=9 or 8>=3. did somebody know what that means ?!?

  • Problem with propagation

    I had successfully configired streams in my environment.Initailly whatever i performed dml operations like insert its replicate to my target database .When delete one row from my source database ,not deleted from my target database hence then whateve