I NEED select ..... for all entries for this logic

From table RBDRSEG, we need to pick up the field RBDRSEG-MATNR where RBDRSEG- RBLNR= RBKP-BELNR. If the program does not find any data then it can pick up the material id field from EKPO-MATNR for all the invoices picked up during the processing.

Hi,
Lets say that Invoices are in Int table ITAB.
IF NOT ITAB[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT MATNR FROM RBDRSEG INTO V_MATNR
for all entries in itab
where RBLNR= ITAB-BELNR.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
SELECT MATNR FROM RSEG INTO V_MATNR
for all entries in ITAB
where BELNR= ITAB-BELNR.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Use RSEG instead of EKPO because EKPO don't have BELNR(Invoice) field.
Regards,
Anji
Message was edited by:
Anji Reddy Vangala
Message was edited by:
Anji Reddy Vangala

Similar Messages

Usage of 'Select for all entries' for dynamic internal tables..

Hi all,
I have a situation where I need to use select for all entries for a dynamic internal table.
select * from /BIC/AZHSD_O1500 into i_table for all entries in <b>Dynamic_table</b> where doc_number = <dynamic_table????????>
here iam not knowing how to match the <dynamic_table????????> doc_number ?
the dynamic_table contains the doc_number as one field.
here dynaimc_table is the internal table which is dynamic.
I have tried various options but couldnot find the solution.
Please resolve.
Sidhartha.

data : i_dyn_where type char72 occurs 0.
field-symbols : <fs> type table.
assign itab[] to <fs>.
i_dyn_where = 'docno = <fs>-docno'.
append i_dyn_where.
select *
from   vbak
into   table t_vbak
for    all entries in <fs>
where (I_dyn_where).   "Populate this where condition dynamically too
Hope this will solve ur prob.

Need to read all entris for field prtxt from table /sapsll/prt

hi
i need to read all entries from table /sapsll/prt field prtxt but only one is coming
pls see below seelct statement
if not gt_sagmeld[] is initial.
            SELECT /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuit         " PK
                   /sapsll/cuit~QUANT_FLT         " to be displayed
                   /sapsll/cuit~QUAUM             " to be displayed
                   /sapsll/cuit~RPTDT             " to be displayed
                   /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuhd
                   /sapsll/cuit~guid_pr           " needed for gt_prt inttab
                  /sapsll/corref~refno
                   /sapsll/corref~guid_pobj
            INTO corresponding fields of table gt_sapsllcuit
            FROM ( ( /sapsll/cuit
            inner join /sapsll/cuhd on /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuhd = /sapsll/cuhd~guid_cuhd )
            inner join /sapsll/corref on /sapsll/corref~guid_pobj = /sapsll/cuhd~guid_cuhd )
            FOR all entries in gt_sagmeld
            WHERE /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuit = gt_sagmeld-guid_pobj.
         endif.
        if not gt_sapsllcuit[] is initial.
         select /sapsll/prt~prtxt
                /sapsll/prt~guid_pr
         into corresponding fields of table gt_prt
         from /sapsll/prt
         for all entries in gt_sapsllcuit
         where /sapsll/prt~guid_pr = gt_sapsllcuit-guid_pr.
loop at gt_sagmeld into wa_sagmeld.
read table gt_sapsllcuit into wa_sapsllcuit
with key guid_cuit = wa_sagmeld-guid_pobj
binary search.
Read table gt_prcon into wa_prcon with key
guid_pr = wa_sapsllcuit-guid_pr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
*wa_sagmeld_outtab-guid_pr = wa_prt-guid_pr.
here i am facing problem as multiple entries from table /sapsll/prt is not being displayed only one.....but i have checked in table it is having two enteries
pls suggest
reagards
Nishant

Hi Nishant!
When you use 'for all entries' SAP (or database?) does a 'delete adjacent duplicates' on the result. This is necessary because of the special selection technique in this case.
You need to select enough columns from /sapsll/prt, so that your two entries will differ in the result.
Regards,
Christian

Inner join Vs for all entries for performance

hi,
i need to fetch data from 5 tables where i have common key vbeln, is this suggestable to write a select query with inner join or write an inner join for 2 tables with more fileds and for remaining using for all entries.... please suggest how can i increase the performance...all points are rewarded....
thnaks alot.

Is this a dialog program or a data extract? Rob is right in that the difference is negligible IF the number of records involved are only a few.
On the other hand, if you are extracting a large number of records, then the performance depends on a number of things and is generally unpredictable.
The way I approach it is by first developing the extract program with a join because it is easier to code. If the program run time is within the acceptable range, I would let it be and migrate to production. If the performance is of high priority and if the join appears to take long time, then I will comment out the code and try the FAE approach. If the run time with FAE is not markedly better, then I would go back to join.

Performance issue with select query and for all entries.

hi,
i have a report to be performance tuned.
the database table has around 20 million entries and 25 fields.
so, the report fetches the distinct values of two fields using one select query.
so, the first select query fetches around 150 entries from the table for 2 fields.
then it applies some logic and eliminates some entries and makes entries around 80-90...
and then it again applies the select query on the same table using for all entries applied on the internal table with 80-90 entries...
in short,
it accesses the same database table twice.
so, i tried to get the database table in internal table and apply the logic on internal table and delete the unwanted entries.. but it gave me memory dump, and it wont take that huge amount of data into abap memory...
is around 80-90 entries too much for using "for all entries"?
the logic that is applied to eliminate the entries from internal table is too long, and hence cannot be converted into where clause to convert it into single select..
i really cant find the way out...
please help.

chinmay kulkarni wrote:Chinmay,
Even though you tried to ask the question with detailed explanation, unfortunately it is still not clear.
It is perfectly fine to access the same database twice. If that is working for you, I don't think there is any need to change the logic. As Rob mentioned, 80 or 8000 records is not a problem in "for all entries" clause.
>
> so, i tried to get the database table in internal table and apply the logic on internal table and delete the unwanted entries.. but it gave me memory dump, and it wont take that huge amount of data into abap memory...
>
It is not clear what you tried to do here. Did you try to bring all 20 million records into an internal table? That will certainly cause the program to short dump with memory shortage.
> the logic that is applied to eliminate the entries from internal table is too long, and hence cannot be converted into where clause to convert it into single select..
>
That is fine. Actually, it is better (performance wise) to do much of the work in ABAP than writing a complex WHERE clause that might bog down the database.

Select query 'for all entries'

Hello Friends,
       SELECT emp_id emp_name
       INTO corresponding fields of table itab_emp
       FROM employee
       for all entries in itab_dept
       WHERE emp_id = itab_dept_emp_id.
In the above select query we are using 'for all entries' for the internal table itab_dept.What will happen if the join fails?Will we get any data in the output table?
What is the prerequisites for using 'for all entries'.
Please advice me on this.
Regards
Ashish.

Hi
In this case all the records available in employee table are extracted into internal table itab_emp.
It is safe to check whether itab_dept is initial or not.
If it is initial then stop the select query.
Check the following program u will get an idea.
Also try this program by removing comment to 'REFRESH IT_LFA1'.
REPORT ZBM_PG                                  .
TABLES: LFA1, EKKO.
DATA:
     IT_LFA1 TYPE TABLE OF LFA1 WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY INITIAL SIZE 10,
      IT_LFA1 TYPE TABLE OF LFA1 WITH HEADER LINE,
      IT_EKKO TYPE TABLE OF EKKO WITH HEADER LINE.
SELECT * FROM LFA1 INTO TABLE IT_LFA1 WHERE LIFNR EQ '0000001000' OR LIFNR EQ '0000001500'.
SELECT * FROM LFA1 INTO TABLE IT_LFA1 UP TO 1 ROWS.
refresh it_lfa1.
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO TABLE IT_EKKO FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_LFA1 WHERE LIFNR = IT_LFA1-LIFNR.
LOOP AT IT_EKKO.
WRITE: / IT_EKKO-LIFNR, IT_EKKO-EBELN.
ENDLOOP.
Reward me if it is useful

Select for all entries+offset

Folks,
please find my code below:
SELECT partner bpkind FROM but000 INTO TABLE i_but000
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN lt_cmst_rtcm_bw
    WHERE partner = lt_cmst_rtcm_bw-tk_partner_i+0(10).
    SORT i_but000 BY partner.
partner is of length 10, tk_partner_i is of length 32.
when i use this offset value for comparison, its giving me the correct output. no errors.
but am getting this warning:
Bei der Verwendung von FOR ALL ENTRIES wird die Längenangabe für "TK_PARTNER_I" in dieser Bedingung ignoriert.
Do i have to mind this warning??..
if this is to be considered, please suggest me an alternate solution to use "For all entries" in this case.
Thanks in advance..
Yog

>
yogaprakash srirangan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually i am writing this code in CRM system's CMOD-User exit program.
>
> when i remove the offset i am getting this error:
>
> When using the addition "FOR ALL ENTRIES IN itab", the fields "PARTNER"     and "LT_CMST_RTCM_BW-TK_PARTNER_I" must have the same type and length.and length.
>
> but with offset its generating warning and internal table is getting filled..
>
> so can you please explain me on this?..
>
> Thanks,
> Yog
Wow! It seems you have indeed found a bug! With the length specification you get a warning, without you get an error!
I've also written a little test program
TYPES: BEGIN OF mandt_ty,
         mandt TYPE char6,
       END OF mandt_ty.
DATA: t_mandt TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF mandt_ty WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY mandt,
      l_mandt TYPE mandt_ty.
DATA: lt_t000 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF t000 WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY mandt,
      ls_t000 TYPE t000.
l_mandt-mandt = '1201'.
INSERT l_mandt INTO TABLE t_mandt.
SELECT * FROM t000 INTO TABLE lt_t000 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_mandt WHERE mandt = t_mandt-mandt+1(3).
*SELECT * FROM t000 INTO TABLE lt_t000 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_mandt WHERE mandt = t_mandt-mandt.
LOOP AT lt_t000 INTO ls_t000.
WRITE: ls_t000-mandt.
ENDLOOP.
And it seems that the offset isn't being ignored. I've also done and SQL trace, and this confirms that the offset isn't being ignored - the SQL issued actually says SELECT WHERE "MANDT" = '020' even though I've set it in the table to be 1201.
So it seems that, at the moment, you can safely ignore the message. But if SAP ever enforce it, or they make it an error instead of a warning, there will be problems.
matt

Why should we select all key fields when using for all entries

Hi,
Why should we select all key fields in our select query when using for all entries statement?
I read about for all entries but this point was not clear in any post.
Please explain me
Regards,
Subhashini

Dear Subhasini,
It is because FOR ALL ENTRIES deletes the duplicate entries before populating the target internal table.
Please do an F1 on FOR ALL ENTRIES & read the SAP documentation.
I mean how duplicate entries will not get deleted when we use this?
Quite simple, if you select all key fields then each entry will be unique & there will not be any duplicate entries to delete !!
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Oct 16, 2009 9:41 AM

Inner join and select for all entries with respect to performance in SAP

Hi Friends,
I just want to know which is more efficient with respect to performance the Inner join or select for all entries?which is more efficient?
Regards,
Dinesh

I did some testing a while ago and found that a JOIN is usually a bit more efficient than FOR ALL ENTRIES. This wasn't always the case though, so the best thing to do is to write it both ways and see which is faster.
Rob

Max no of records in for all entries table

Hello all,
Hi have used for all entries in a select statement in BW extractor. This extractor is working fine for the test data. When i moved this code to pre-production for testing, there this extractor has to deal with thousands of records. In pre-prod , this select statement is not picking up all the records available in DB. Can any one give any idea on behavior of for all entries for large number of records. and is the any max limit for for all entries table.
Thank you..correct answer will be rewarded.
Regards
Sravan

Moderator message - Please search before asking and do not offer rewards (particularly since as far as I can see, you've awarded a total of two points in the last two years - post locked
Rob

For all entries with 2 internal table

HI experts.
How to use 2 for all entries in a select statement.
Below refer to my below code.
select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
it_lips for all entries in it_likp   where
              vbeln = it_likp-vbeln and
              matnr = it_mara-matnr.
I want to add another for all entries it_mara.
Please help me .Thanks in advanced.

hi,
it is possible....
use this query...
declare another internal table of the same type as it_lips.
data : it_lips_final like it_lips.
select vbeln matnr lfimg vgbel posnr from lips into corresponding fields of table
it_lips for all entries in it_likp where
vbeln = it_likp-vbeln .
loop at it_lips.
read table it_mara into it_mara with key matnr = it_lips-matnr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
    append it_lips to it_lips_final.
endif.
endloop.
refresh it_lips[].
it_lips[] = it_lips_final[]
what the above code does is selects all the entries of vbeln from lips and filters it in the loop reading it from mara checking for matnr value and finally
all the entries according to your requirement is there in it_lips_final which we move it to it_lips again...
this is something similar to writing a for all entries for 2 table.... but in another fashion
Regards
Siddarth

FOR ALL ENTRIES IN Problem

Hello,
probably it is a silly problem, but can anybody tell me why this FOR ALL ENTRIES IN statement does not fill all the columns of my internal table?
At the end of the report only the columns LGOBE contains values.
data itab type zmm_t_alv.
select mardmatnr mardwerks mardlgort mardlabst
maktspras maktmaktx
into corresponding fields of table itab
from mard inner join makt
    on mardmatnr = maktmatnr
where makt~spras = 'D'.
select lgobe
into corresponding fields of table itab
from t001l
for all entries in itab
where t001l~werks = itab-werks.
break-point.
Thanks,
Manuel

Please read the documentation aboutr for all entries
For all entries selects all records from a db table which correspond to the entries in an internal table, the result must be stored in a different table.
Otherwise use a loop at itab.
   select single ...
   modify itab
   endloop
Be careful with empty For all entries tables, it behave like a ranges table, no entry means no restriction and you get all records from the db table. That is a different behavior than the loop above.
Use   field1 field2 ... in corresponding fields of ....
If you specify only one field then you get only one result.
If you want one the field 'lgobe' then use into wa-lgobe and not the much slower into corresponding!
Siegfried

Can we use inner joins with for all entries?

Hi,
    Can we use innerjoin on two tables MARA and MAKT against the materials in
    the internal table.
    If so ,please let me know whether there is performance issue.Because if there is
    bad performance issue or something else like thise means,my project manager
    wont allow to include.
    So can one let me know about this.
Thanks,
Balaji

Hi Arunkumar,
                           I think you are not clear.My question is can I use innerjoin with
for all entries.For example below is my code.
SELECT A~MATNR
         B~MAKTX
         A~MTART
         A~MATKL
         FROM MARA AS A INNER JOIN MAKT AS B
         ON AMATNR = BMATNR
         INTO TABLE IT_MARA_MAKT
         FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_MATNR
         WHERE A~MATNR = IT_MATNR-MATNR
         AND   A~EXTWG = P_EXTWG
         AND   A~SPART = P_SPART.
Can we use like this for all entries along with innerjoins.
Thanks,
Balaji

FOR ALL ENTRIES in Object Oriented Context

Dear all,
is it possible to use FOR ALL ENTRIES for an internal table with out header line ? I Am using Objected Oriented Programming and I Am not able to create internal table with header line . Please provide your valuable inputs on this issue.
Thanks In Advance.
Sri

Hello,
Few questions:
1. Did you do an F1 on FOR ALL ENTRIES(FAE)? Does it say FAE is allowed only for tables w. header line?
2. Have you tried using FAE on an internal table w/o header line? Does it give an error?
BR,
Suhas

Performance on Select Single&Write AND Select*(For All Entries)&Read&Write

Hi Experts,
I got a code review problem & we are in a argument.
I need the best performance code out of this two codes. I have tested this both on 5 & 1000 & 3000 & 100,000 & 180,000 records.
But still, I just need a second opinion of experts.
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_account,
        saknr   TYPE   skat-saknr,
        END OF ty_account.
DATA : g_txt50      TYPE skat-txt50.
DATA : g_it_skat    TYPE TABLE OF skat,       g_wa_skat    LIKE LINE OF g_it_skat.
DATA : g_it_account TYPE TABLE OF ty_account, g_wa_account LIKE LINE OF g_it_account.
Code 1.
SELECT saknr INTO TABLE g_it_account FROM skat.
LOOP AT g_it_account INTO g_wa_account.
SELECT SINGLE txt50 INTO g_txt50 FROM skat
    WHERE spras = 'E'
      AND ktopl = 'XXXX'
      AND saknr = g_wa_account-saknr.
WRITE :/ g_wa_account-saknr, g_txt50.
CLEAR : g_wa_account, g_txt50.
ENDLOOP.
Code 2.
SELECT saknr INTO TABLE g_it_account FROM skat.
SELECT * INTO TABLE g_it_skat FROM skat
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN g_it_account
      WHERE spras = 'E'
        AND ktopl = 'XXXX'
        AND saknr = g_it_account-saknr.
LOOP AT g_it_account INTO g_wa_account.
READ TABLE g_it_skat INTO g_wa_skat WITH KEY saknr = g_wa_account-saknr.
WRITE :/ g_wa_account-saknr, g_wa_skat-txt50.
CLEAR : g_wa_account, g_wa_skat.
ENDLOOP.
Thanks & Regards,
Dileep .C

Hi Dilip.
from you both the code I have found that you are selecting 2 diffrent fields.
In Code 1.
you are selecting SAKNR and then for these SAKNR you are selecting TXT50 from the same table.
and in Code 2 you are selecting all the fields from SAKT table for all the values of SAKNR.
I don't know whats your requirement.
Better you declare a select option on screen and then fetch required fields from SAKT table for the values entered on screen for SAKNR.
you only need TXT50 and SAKNR fields.
so declare two types one for SAKNR and another for TXT50.
Points to be remember.
1. while using for all entries always check the for all entries table should not be blank.
2. you will have to fetch all the key fields in table while applying for all entries,
    you can compare key fields with a constant which is greater than initial value.
3. while reading the table sort the table by the field on which you are going to read it.
try this:
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_account,
saknr TYPE skat-saknr,
END OF ty_account.
TYPES : begin of T_txt50,
      saknr type saknr,
      txt50 type txt50,
end of t_txt50.
DATA: i_account type table of t_account,
      w_account type t_account,
      i_txt50 type table t_txt50,
      w_txt50 type t_txt50.
select SAKNR from SKAT into table i_account.
if sy-subrc = 0.
sort i_account by saknr.
select saknr txt50 from SKAT into table i_txt50
for all entries in i_account
where SAKNR = i_account-SAKNR
here mention al the primary keys and compare them with their constants.
endif.
Note; here you need to take care that, you will have to fetch all the key fields in table i_txt50.
and compare those fields with there constants which should be greater than initial values.
they should be in proper sequence.
now for writing.
loop at i_account into w_account.
clear w_txt50.
sort i_txt50 by saknr.
read table i_txt50 into w_txt50 with key SAKNR = w_account-saknr
if sy-subrc = 0.
write: w_txt50-saknr, w-txt50-txt50.
clear w_txt50, w_account.
endif.
endloop.
Hope it wil clear your doubts.
Thanks
Lalit

I NEED select ..... for all entries for this logic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for