IB Section Index Row Count option

I was wondering what the option "Section Index Row Count" in Interface Builder does?
There's no option to tell IB how many sections there are in a UITableViewController and I thought that was the purpose of the methods numberOfSectionsInTableView and numberOfRowsInSection.
I'm new to iPhone programming but it seems to ignore whatever you set in IB and uses the methods defined in UITableViewController

I haven't read your code, but can make a guess at what's going wrong. Checkboxes do behave in a weird manner depending upon whether you have selected one or many.
Assuming this is the statement where you are generating the checkbox :
<input type="checkbox" name="checkBoxName" value="<%= someValue %>">
What you could do is read the checked checkBoxes in an array :
String[] values = request.getParameterValues("checkBoxName");
int sizeOfValues = values.length;
Then use the sizeOfValues to perform your delete action :
if (sizeOfValues==1)
     performDelete();
else
     for (int i=0; i<sizeOfValues(); i++)
          performDelete();
Hope this technique works.

Similar Messages

Error when creating index with parallel option on very large table

I am getting a
"7:15:52 AM ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kxfqupp_bad_cvl], [7940], [6], [0], [], [], [], []"
error when creating an index with parallel option. Which is strange because this has not been a problem until now. We just hit 60 million rows in a 45 column table, and I wonder if we've hit a bug.
Version 10.2.0.4
O/S Linux
As a test I removed the parallel option and several of the indexes were created with no problem, but many still threw the same error... Strange. Do I need a patch update of some kind?

This is most certainly a bug.
From metalink it looks like bug 4695511 - fixed in 10.2.0.4.1

Row count in Pivotal View (10 rows per page)

Hi
I tried following options to restrict row count in Pivotal view of a report, however the out put is inconsistent in pivotal view.
1. CEILING((RCOUNT(1))/10.0)
2. TRUNCATE((RCOUNT(1)-1)/10, 0) +1
3. Even Case statement also
Appreciate the help extended

just a note now its ok..i think its a transactional database ....some how the data has changed it modified the query and ur getting correct results am i correct ?
think of a solution to get a bug free report ;)
thanks,
Saichand.v

Change the size of a repeating section based on which optional sections are selected

InfoPath 2010
I've created a repeating section in a form that has 8 optional sections. All the optional sections are hidden until the user selects one from a drop down list, which only allows one selection per repeated section.
My problem is that the repeating section is quite long to accommodate the 8 optional sections. Every time a user adds a section there is a long blank space in the form.
Is there a way to scale the size of the repeating field to eliminate the excess blank space?

Hi,
Try to remove all the blank space from repeating section and choose the Height, Padding and Margin of the repeating section as auto.
After that add table with 8 row and add your optional section in each row, do same thing for each optional section, remove blank space before adding any control and choose height, padding and margin as auto.
I designed the same and it is not taking more than single line space until we select the value from dropdown list.
If still it does not work, please share your design if you don’t mind we would be happy to help you
Krishana Kumar http://www.mosstechnet-kk.com

Row Count mismatch in a table

Hi,
I am having a table and if i do count(*) , the total rows are coming 36882, but if i take export backup or select * from table, it is showing 7225. Any help to trace out the problem is highly appreciated. I am using oracle 9.2.0.4 in aix 5.3
Regards
Sridhar

Is the "table" being selected from and rows counted, an actual table? Confirm using ALL_OBJECTS. What is the table type? Hash?
s. I have counted in the actual table only. From all_objects, the object type is TABLE.
Is FGAC (Fine Grain Access Control) used? Have you tried the select count or export from the SYS schema (exempt from FGAC)? Have you looked at the execution plans?
No FGAC is used in that table. Export taken from sys also. Then also the same problem.Execution plan has been verified.
If full table scan is performed, then less number of rows are returned. If the index hint is used and give count(*) or select * from table_name, all rows are returned.
What happens when a CTAS is done against this table - what is the rowcount of the new table?
if we give select * from alone then 7000+ rows alone created in new table.
If index hint is used for ctas, then all the rows nearly 38000 rows are created in the new table.
There are numerous sanity checks to do, before "accusing" a table of showing incorrect and buggy row count totals
- All levels of trouble shooting has been already done and no use. This is the second time, i am facing this problem.
Hence raised the issue and requested help from others.

How to change color of rows count dispalyed while debugging ssis packages

Hello,
in visual 2013 ssdt version I have row count displayed in white color on pale background: bit.ly/1oWP1Cm
I'd like to have it in black. I know it should be changeable in Options -> Fonts and Colors, but what option should I change from myriads available?
Thank you in advance.

My colleague had the same issue in that we couldn't see the numbers. We couldn't figure out why we couldn't see the numbers and the design screen was white. It looked like the numbers were displaying in white over the connections lines. So
we changed the color scheme to light and the numbers appeared in black. WHen we switched the color scheme back to dark, the canvas turned dark and the text was in white.
So there must be a bug when selecting the color scheme on the first run of Visual Studio 2013 in that it doesn't set the correct canvas color for the SSIS designer. Luckily toggling the color scheme resolves the issue.
Christian Jones Software Developer, former Network/Sys Admin

Cursor ORDER BY Clause Changing Row Count In BULK COLLECT ... FOR LOOP?

Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 running on Windows Server 2003
Oracle Client 10.2.0.2.0 running on Windows 2000
I have some PL/SQL code that's intended to update a column in a table based on a lookup from another table. I started out by testing it with the UPDATE statement commented out, just visually inspecting the DBMS_OUTPUT results to see if it was sane. During this testing I added/changed the cursor ORDER BY clause to make it easier to read the output, and saw some strange results. I've run the code 3 times with:
1. no ORDER BY clause
2. ORDER BY with two columns (neither indexed)
3. ORDER BY with one column (not indexed)
and get three different "rows updated" counts - in fact, when using the ORDER BY clauses it appears that the code is processing more rows than without either ORDER BY clause. I'm wondering why adding / changing an ORDER BY <non-indexed column> clause in a cursor would affect the row count?
The code structure is:
TYPE my_Table_t IS TABLE OF table1%ROWTYPE ;
my_Table my_Table_t ;
CURSOR my_Cursor IS SELECT * FROM table1 ; -- initial case - no ORDER BY clause
-- ORDER BY table1.column1, table1.column2 ; -- neither column indexed
-- ORDER BY table1.column2 ; -- column not indexed
my_Loop_Count NUMBER := 0 ;
OPEN my_Cursor ;
LOOP
FETCH my_Cursor BULK COLLECT INTO my_Table LIMIT 100 ;
EXIT WHEN my_Table.COUNT = 0 ;
FOR i IN 1..my_Table.COUNT LOOP
my_New_Value := <call a pkg.funct to retrieve expected value from another table> ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value IS NULL ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value = <an undesirable value> ;
IF my_New_Value <> my_Table(i).column3 THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( 'Changing ' || my_Table(i).column3 || ' to ' || my_New_Value ) ;
UPDATE table1 SET column3 = my_New_Value WHERE column_pk = my_Table(i).column_pk ;
my_Loop_Count := my_Loop_Count + 1 ;
END IF ;
END LOOP ;
COMMIT ;
END LOOP ;
CLOSE my_Cursor ;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( 'Processed ' || my_Loop_Count || ' Rows ' ) ;

Hello (and welcome),
Your handling the inner cursor exit control is suspect, which will result in (seemingly) erratic record counts.
Instead of:
LOOP
FETCH my_Cursor BULK COLLECT INTO my_Table LIMIT 100 ;
EXIT WHEN my_Table.COUNT = 0 ;
FOR i IN 1..my_Table.COUNT LOOP
my_New_Value := <call a pkg.funct to retrieve expected value from another table> ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value IS NULL ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value = <an undesirable value> ;
IF my_New_Value my_Table(i).column3 THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( 'Changing ' || my_Table(i).column3 || ' to ' || my_New_Value ) ;
UPDATE table1 SET column3 = my_New_Value WHERE column_pk = my_Table(i).column_pk ;
my_Loop_Count := my_Loop_Count + 1 ;
END IF ;
END LOOP ;
COMMIT ;
END LOOP ;Try this:
LOOP
FETCH my_Cursor BULK COLLECT INTO my_Table LIMIT 100 ;
FOR i IN 1..my_Table.COUNT LOOP
my_New_Value := <call a pkg.funct to retrieve expected value from another table> ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value IS NULL ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value = <an undesirable value> ;
IF my_New_Value my_Table(i).column3 THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( 'Changing ' || my_Table(i).column3 || ' to ' || my_New_Value ) ;
UPDATE table1 SET column3 = my_New_Value WHERE column_pk = my_Table(i).column_pk ;
my_Loop_Count := my_Loop_Count + 1 ;
END IF ;
EXIT WHEN my_Cursor%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP ;
END LOOP ;
COMMIT ;Which also takes the COMMIT outside of the LOOP -- try to never have a COMMIT inside of any LOOP.
Additionally, not too sure about these:
my_New_Value := <call a pkg.funct to retrieve expected value from another table> ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value IS NULL ;
EXIT WHEN my_New_Value = <an undesirable value> ;Any one of those EXITs will bypass your my_Loop_Count increment.
Edited by: SeánMacGC on Jul 9, 2009 8:37 AM
Had the cursor not found in the wrong place, now corrected.

Next/Prev in Report row counter

How do you have the Next/Prev selectors appear with the row counter section at the bottom of reports.
I created an SQL report, and although I selected use report pagination, the Next/Prev selectors are missing at the bottom of the report with the row counter.
If I manually create an Next/Prev process, this build buttons outside the report row counter in the report region. Since all my other reports have the selectors inside the report with the counters, it looks goofy to sudddenly have Next/Prev buttons outside the report.
Thanks

Kevin,
Edit the report's attributes and verify that pagination is indeed turned on. Also, are you using HTML DB 1.6?
Sergio

Count option in abap programme

Dear
I am writing abap programme.
i want count option in abap programme.
For how many rows display in my programme.
pls suggest.

To display count of rows in ur final table use this code:
data: l_lines type i.
l_lines = lines( itab ).
write: l_lines.

Row Count in OBIEE Analysis

Hi Frendz,
How to Display the Row count in the table view ?
i have checked with the Table Properties it is having Rows per Page option. (Default value is 25)
But we are having the Dynamic output using with Prompt . when we run the report select with some Prompt value that is generated 5 ,10 or less then 2 rows but that time we don't get the Row count.
and we tried with Narrative is fine but we need in the same table view.
How to get the Row count for all the output.
Plese Help Me Guys !!!!!!
Thanks,
Delli

You suppose to mention about direct db request... it would be nice if you put complete info !!!
Since it is DB request in BI try to build a logic equivalent to as below function in BI.
max(rsum(1))
Have fun
If helps mark

Conditional display based on row count

I have a report region with sql query (PL/SQL function body returning sql query). In this region i have text item above the report. I would like to have a condition on this item that it should only show if there exists records in the report (row count > 0).
How can this be done?
Best regards
Erik

There are many options available for conditional display. You can use this one here:
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:7
Denes Kubicek
http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
http://www.opal-consulting.de/training
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:1
http://www.amazon.de/Oracle-APEX-XE-Praxis/dp/3826655494
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Displaying rows with reference to row count.

Situation :
I am trying to display data which are or of 820 rows by default.
When user select some data , I will display some data but if he not selecting any data then it is displaying all 820 rows.
So i used a count option where i wrote a code
<?choose:?><?when:count(_Company_Prompt_._PL_Unit_Number_and_Name_-Prompt)=820?><?'ALL'?><?end when?><?otherwise:?><?_Company_Prompt_._PL_Unit_Number_and_Name_-Prompt?><?end otherwise?><?end choose?>
for the field count CompanyPrompt_._PL_Unit_Number_and_Name_-Prompt
But it works fine if i dont use repeating group but that no use because it will show all for report defaults but when user select more than one , it still display only one row.
i am try to use same code with F <?for-each:PARAMETER_FOR_BUSINESS_UNIT_ROW?> E
The code for f is <?for-each:PARAMETER_FOR_BUSINESS_UNIT_ROW?>
the code for <?for-each:PARAMETER_FOR_BUSINESS_UNIT_ROW?> is given above
the code for e is <?end for-each?>
how can I fix this,
Thanks
Aj

I don't quite understand your requirement clearly as stated, I am guessing that you are using a dashboard prompt and your answers request is filtered based on the prompt.
Based on the default value, all rows are returned, and if the user selects some value from the prompt, data is filtered.
Within the template, if the count is equal to 820 then you want to show the text 'ALL' otherwise show all rows?
you could try the following: Declare a variable like so:
<?variable:myvar;count(_Company_Prompt_._PL_Unit_Number_and_Name_-Prompt)?>
then check if this variable value is equal to 820 then print the text 'ALL' or do your regular logic..
<?choose:?>
<?when:$myvar=820?><?'ALL'?>
<?end when?>
<?otherwise?>
<? other logic?>
<?end otherwise?>
<?end choose?>
You can also use two templates within the main RTF and call them as appropriate based on the count check.
Hope this helps. Sorry if I misunderstood your requirements.

Can't View All Records if Max Row Count is null

Hi,
There are over 2500 records in a table and if Max Row Count is set to nothing in report attributes, the user is restricted to view only 500 records. And If Max Row Count is set more than 2500 then user is able to view all records but taking more time to display report.
What to do to minimise process time and allow user to view all the records. ?
Pagination Scheme : Row Ranges X to Y of Z (with pagination)
Number of Rows : 100
Number of Rows (Item) : <empty>
Max Row Count : <empty>
Thanks,
Ven.

Hi Ven,
Apex restricts the number of rows returned by a report to 500 by default. You can change this by setting the Max Row Count. Apex does this so that the amount of data returned over the network to the browser is kept to a reasonable amount. The reason it is done this way is because a user in apex does not maintain a stateful connection to the database and as a result, rows returned from a query can not be cached in the database and fetched as required.
From a usability point of view, I'm not sure why a user would want 2500+ rows returned to a screen. They would have to scroll and paginate to find anything of use and network bandwidth would get chewed up in the process. Why not provide the users with query options so that the number rows returned to the browser is restricted to a more manageable amount? If the users require a full hardcopy of the data then you can handle this with csv and pdf options.
Regards
Andre

ALV Row Counter or row number

hi,
plz i want to make row counter or row number in alv report , how can i?
ex.
NO : Name   : age
1      : ahm    : 12
2       : a2        : 25
3        : a3       : 30
30
waiting answers
thanks

Take an additional field in your ITAB as 'counter'
Make counter = counter + 1, before your APPEND ITAB statement.
But I think better options is in TOP-OF-PAGE, take a value of counter = '<no>'.
DESCRIBE TABLE it_final LINES t_cnt.
CONDENSE t_cnt.
wa_top-typ = 'S'.
wa_top-key = 'Total no.of Records: '.
wa_top-info = t_cnt.
APPEND wa_top TO it_top.
CLEAR wa_top.
Edited by: ashleshabhagatshelke on Aug 31, 2010 3:24 AM

Problem w/: Error while getting estimated row count for view

JDev 10.1.3 - Steps
1. created a ADF VO w/ one bind variable vNAME.
2. Created a basic jspx page, use the data control pal. to drop in VO w/ executeparam option. Use the data control pal to drop in VO w/ ADF Read-Only Table w/ select and sort option. Selected all VO columns in table.
3. Following Error msg occurs when running jspx page -
oracle.jbo.DMLException: Error while getting estimated row count for view object CategoryView, statement SELECT count(1) FROM (SELECT
CATEGORY.CATID CATID,
CATEGORY.NAME NAME,
CATEGORY.PICTURE PICTURE,
CATEGORY.ACTIVE ACTIVE
FROM
CATEGORY
WHERE
(CATEGORY.NAME LIKE UPPER(:vName)||'%')) .
Tested SQL Statement in SQL Worksheet works ok (with a Value replacing ':vName').
Can anyone advise - seems to be a straight forward process that is returning this error msg. I have tried variations of the SQL stmt with no luck. The jspx page errors when the ADF Read-Only Table is added.

I seem 2 have the same error, in a slightly different situation.
I have a view which subclasses a Entity with a history column 'CreatedOn'. When performing a quick search/filter on this column I get the same error. The ADF app is build on a DB2 database, so no named parameters here. Instead invalid SQL is created when executing the estimated row count. The WHERE clause contains 'CreatedOn = null', should be 'CreatedOn is null'. Furthermore the input of my quick search is not filled in this clause.
Any help would be appreciated

IB Section Index Row Count option

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for