Identify meter reading is too high, too low, correct

hi all,
i have requirement where customer will enter meter reading online (java portal).
after that i need to check meter reading is too high, too low, correct.
and date of meter reading is early, late, correct.
is their any standard FM which i can use?
or do we have maximum, minimum values predefined for meter reading in any table?
i have checked table TE121 but no use.
please guide me
Regards,
sidh

Hi,
Hi,
The way the others have suggested is correct. you can use the tolerance in config validation.
you can enter consumption range against validation class with positive & negative deviation.
example
RESI               1 to 100                +deviation 300                   -ve deviation 30
this validation works on base period category
If the base period is previous period, then it will take the consumption of previous month (else previous period last year)
Now the total number of days for previous month are 30 and unit consumed is 900
now we will calculate the number of days to be assessed & multiple it with per day consumption, this will yield expected consumption. for ex. no of assessed days are
28 then 28 *30 = 840 units
from expected consumption you can calculate the min/max consumption depending what you have defined in tolerance
like here 300%  positive deviation means total 400% means 840 *4 = 3360 unit max consumption
& 30% negative deviation means total 70% (100-30) means 840*.7 = 588 unit min consumption
Means in this range the consumption will not be implausible (from 588 to 3360), otherwise system will automatically make the reading implausible.
so the
Expected MR                   last reading +840
Upper limit of MR             last reading +3360
Lower limit of MR            last reading +588
I hope, it will help in solving your issue.
Regards
rohjin

Similar Messages

  • I'm trying to submit a gas meter reading and have gotten a message that says firefox is "too modern" How do I fix this?

    I got an error message that says the web browser I have is too modern and it won't allow me to submit my gas meter reading.
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == I signed on to my gas company website and couldn't submit my meter reading

    Hello Carol,
    could you maybe try to use the [https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/1419/ IETab] add-on?
    Kind regards,
    Tobbi
    Firefox Support Volunteer

  • How do you fix error message "data rate for this file is too high for DVD.  You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate".

    When trying to burn a DVD it will go through the encoding step and at 98% we see the message 'data rate for this file is too high for DVD.  You must replace this file with one of a lower data rate".  We need help to correct this so we can complete burning to DVD. 

    What did you export from Premiere?
    Did you use the MPEG2-DVD preset... and did you make any changes to the preset?
    CS5-thru-CC PPro/Encore tutorial list http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1448923 may help

  • Alert: Logical disk transfer (reads and writes) latency is too high Resolution state

    Hi 
    We are getting following errors for my 2 virtual servers. We are getting this alert continuously. My setup Windows 2008 R2 SP1 2 node Hyper V cluster. Which is hosted 7 guest OS out of am facing this problem with to guest os. Once this alert started
    my backup running slow.  
    Alert: Logical disk transfer (reads and writes) latency  is too high
    Source: E:
    Path: Servername.domain.com
    Last modified by: System
    Last modified time: 4/23/2013 4:15:47 PM Alert description: The threshold for the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter has been exceeded.
    Alert view link: "http://server/OperationsManager?DisplayMode=Pivot&AlertID=%7bca891ba3-e9f2-421f-9994-7b4d6e867b33%7d"
    Notification subscription ID generating this message: {F71E01AF-0BE6-8377-7BE5-5CB6F5C037A1}
    Reagrds
    Mahesh

    Hi,
    Please see if following helps
    Disk transfer (reads and writes) latency is too high
    The
    threshold for the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter has been exceeded
    If they are of no help, try asking this question in Operations Manager - General forum since alerts are generated by SCOM.
    Regards, Santosh
    I do not represent the organisation I work for, all the opinions expressed here are my own.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

  • Disk Transfer (reads and writes) Latency is Too High

    i keep getting this error:
    the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter  has been exceeded.
    i got these errors on the following servers:
    active directory
    SQL01 (i have 2 sql clustered)
    CAS03 (4 cas server loadbalanced)
    HUB01
    MBX02(Clustered)
    a little info on our environment:
    *Using SAN storage.
    *Disks are new ,and working fine
    *the server has GOOD hardware components(16-32 Gb RAM;Xeon or quadcore........)
    i keep having these notifications everyday; i searched on the internet and i found the cause to be 1 of the 2:
    1) disk hardware issue( non common=rarely )
    2) the queue time on the hard-disk( time to write on the Hard-disk)
    if anyone can assist me with the following:
    1) is this a serious issue that will affect our enviroment?
    2) is it good to edit the time of monitoring to be 10minute(instead of the default 5min)
    3) is there any solution for this?(to prevent these annoying -useless??--- notifications)
    4)what is the cause of this queue delay;;and FYI sometime this happens when nothing and noone is using the server (i.e the server is almost Idle)
    Regards

    The problem is....  exactly what the knowledge of the alert says is wrong.  It is very simple.  Your disk latency is too high at times. 
    This is likely due to overloading the capabilities of the disk, and during peak times, the disk is underperforming.  Or - it could be that occasionally, due to the design of your disks - you get a very large spike in disk latency... and this trips the
    "average" counter.  You could change this monitor to be a consecutive sample threshold monitor, and that would likely quiet it down.... but only doing an analysis of a perfmon of several disks over 24 hours would you be able to determine specifically
    whats going on.
    SCOM did exactly what it is supposed to do.... it alerted your, proactively, to the possible existence of an issue.  Now you, using the knowledge already in the alert, use that information to further investigate, and determine what is the corrective
    action to take. 
    Summary
    The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer (LogicalDisk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer) for the logical disk has exceeded the threshold. The logical disk and possibly even overall system performance may significantly diminish which will result in poor operating system and application
    performance.
    The Avg. Disk sec/ Transfer counter measures the average rate of disk Transfer requests (I/O request packets (IRPs)) that are executed per second on a specific logical disk. This is one measure of storage subsystem throughput.
    Causes
    A high Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter value may occur due to a burst of disk transfer requests by either an operating system or application.
    Resolutions
    To increase the available storage subsystem throughput for this logical disk, do one or more of the following:
    •
    Upgrade the controllers or disk drives.
    •
    Switch from RAID-5 to RAID-0+1.
    •
    Increase the number of actual spindles.
    Be sure to set this threshold value appropriately for your specific storage hardware. The threshold value will vary according to the disk’s underlying storage subsystem. For example, the “disk” might be
    a single spindle or a large disk array. You can use MOM overrides to define exception thresholds, which can be applied to specific computers or entire computer groups.
    Additional Information
    The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter is useful in gathering throughput data. If the average time is long enough, you can analyze a histogram of the array’s response to specific loads (queues, request sizes, and so on). If possible, you should
    observe workloads separately.
    You can use throughput metrics to determine:
    •
    The behavior of a workload running on a given host system. You can track the workload requirements for disk transfer requests over time. Characterization of workloads is an important part of performance analysis and capacity planning.
    •
    The peak and sustainable levels of performance that are provided by a given storage subsystem. A workload can either be used to artificially or naturally push a storage subsystem (in this case, a given logical disk) to its limits. Determining these
    limits provides useful configuration information for system designers and administrators.
    However, without thorough knowledge of the underlying storage subsystem of the logical disk (for example, knowing whether it is a single spindle or a massive disk array), it can be difficult to provide an optimized one size fits all threshold value.
    You must also consider the Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter in conjunction with other transfer request characteristics (for example, request size and randomness/sequentially) and the equivalent counters for write disk requests.
    If the Avg. Disk sec/Transfers counter is tracked over time and if it increases with the intensity of the workloads that are driving the transfer requests, it is reasonable to suspect that the logical disk is saturated if throughput does not increase and
    the user experiences degraded system throughput.
    For more information about storage architecture and driver support, see the Storage - Architecture and Driver Support Web site at
    http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=26156.

  • Reader 11 pdf page numbers printing too high

    After I upgraded to Adobe Reader 11, I have started having issues with page numbers on my pdf forms printing too high on the page. Instead of printing at the bottom of the page, they jump up to wherever the text on the page stops. For instance, if the text stops half way down the page, the page number prints one line beneath that text, so it's in the middle of the page instead of the bottom corner. The file looks fine on the screen, and if I print it in Reader 10 on another computer, it prints at the bottom of the page where it belongs. I've compared settings between my computer, and the computer where the file prints correctly, and I can't find any settings that are different. Has anyone else had this problem? And if so, suggestions for a solution?

    looking again, it prints badly in Chrome, Safari, pdf, preview but NOT Firefox.
    And, I was wrong about Gmail. it prints wrong from gmail, too.

  • "db file scattered read" too high and Query going for full table scan-Why ?

    Hi,
    I had a big table of around 200mb and had a index on it.
    In my query I am using the where clause which has to use the
    index. I am neither using any not null condition
    nor using any function on the index fields.
    Still my query is not using the index.
    It is going for full table scan.
    Also the statspack report is showing the
    "db file scattered read" too high.
    Can any body help and suggest me why this is happenning.
    Also tell me the possible solution for it.
    Thanks
    Arun Tayal

    "db file scattered read" are physical reads/multi block reads. This wait occurs when the session reading data blocks from disk and writing into the memory.
    Take the execution plan of the query and see what is wrong and why the index is not being used.
    However, FTS are not always bad. By the way, what is your db_block_size and db_file_multiblock_read_count values?
    If those values are set to high, Optimizer always favour FTS thinking that reading multiblock is always faster than single reads (index scans).
    Dont see oracle not using index, just find out why oracle is not using index. Use the INDEX hint to force optimizer to use index. Take the execution with/witout index and compare the cardinality,cost and of course, logical reads.
    Jaffar
    Message was edited by:
    The Human Fly

  • Iphone GPS altitude reading too high

    I seem to be reading about 200 ft or 60 metres altitude too high using the "memory mapping" application. Their (memory maps) view is that this is the internal gps reading. Certainly at sea level it does not register a zero. I get the same high readings with motion X and route buddy applications. Is there anything I should be configuring in settings etc?

    Dave Hutch wrote:
    Altitude is notoriously innaccurate using a GPS device. Best reading is from a calibrated altimeter using atmospheric pressure.
    http://gpsinformation.net/main/altitude.htm
    "Altitude error is always considerably worse than the horizontal (position error). Much of this is a matter of geometry. If we (simplistically) consider just four satellites, the "optimum" configuration for best overall accuracy is having the four SVs at 40 to 55 degrees above the horizon and one (for instance) in each general direction N, E, W, and S. (Note: You will get a very BAD DOP if the SVs are at the exact same elevation. Luckily, this is a rare occurrence.) "
    All true but the rule of thumb is that the average error in altitude is about 1.5x the error in horizontal position.
    Joe & Jack's web site (gpsinformation.net) contains a wealth of info about GPS and they are both really nice guys.

  • Bit rate too high DVDSP, build stops.

    DVD Studio Pro used to be DVD Maestro from Discreet, but I was thinking since Apple bought it long ago, it would have a forum.  I searched for DVD and DVDSP and only came up with this forum. 
    If anybody in here uses DVDSP and if you know the solution I would appreciate help with this.
    Upon building this, I did lower the bit rate to a lower size after getting the error message.
    As of now I have the BR between 4.2 and 5.2 as the max br. 
    I'm concerned if I lower it anymore it will start looking like a pixelated mess.  Does anybody know how low you can take the rate and still have a good looking project?
    The project was taped in HDV.  However I encoded it using compressor so I don't think it's an HD file anymore that DVDSP can't read. In the settings you'll see "SD". 
    I'm using DVD Studio Pro 4.
    The settings I used for compressor were:
    Video:
    Name: MPEG-2 6.2Mbps 2-pass
    Description: Fits up to 90 minutes of video with Dolby Digital audio at 192 Kbps or 60 minutes with AIFF audio on a DVD-5
    File Extension: m2v
    Estimated size: 2.79 GB/hour of source
    Type: MPEG-2 video elementary stream
              Usage:SD DVD
    Video Encoder
              Format: M2V
              Width and Height: Automatic
                        Selected: 720 x 480
              Pixel aspect ratio: NTSC CCIR 601/DV (16:9)
              Crop: None
              Padding: None
              Frame rate: (100% of source)
                        Selected: 29.97
              Frame Controls Automatically selected:
                        Retiming: (Fast) Nearest Frame
                        Resize Filter: Linear Filter
                        Deinterlace Filter: Fast (Line Averaging)
                        Adaptive Details: On
                        Antialias: 0
                        Detail Level: 0
                        Field Output: Same as Source
              Start timecode from source
              Aspect ratio: Automatic
                        Selected 16:9
              Field dominance: Automatic:
                         Selected Progressive
              Average bit rate: 6.2 (Mbps)
              2 Pass VBR enabled
                        Maximum bit rate: 7.7 (Mbps)
              High quality
              Best motion estimation
              Closed GOP Size: 15, Structure: IBBP
              DVD Studio Pro meta-data enabled
    Audio:
    Name: AIFF 48:16
    Description: 48kHz, 16-bit AIFF stereo audio
    File Extension: aiff
    Estimated size: unknown
    Audio Encoder
              16-bit Integer (Big Endian), Stereo (L R), 48.000 kHz
    Error message from DVDSP
    Starting DVD Build BIG_DADDY_DVD...
    Compiler Initializing...
    Precompiling Project BIG_DADDY_DVD
    Compiling VMG Information...
    Created 8 PGCs in VTSM1
    Created 8 PGCs in VMG.
    1 Menu(s) will be created...
    Compiling Menu PGCs...
    Compiling Menu#1 (Menu 1)...
    Rendering Menu:Menu 1,Language:1...
    Generating Transition: VTSM #01, VOB #1...
    Writing VIDEO_TS.VOB
    1 VTSs and 1 Titles will be created...
    Compiling VTS#1 (Big Daddy compress video)...
    Muxing VTS_01_1.VOB
    Video Bitrate Too High
    Build cancelled
    Building was not successful. See log.
    I tried the same project in IDVD and it worked like a charm the first time

    There is still a DVDSP Forum - it's under Final Cut Studio at https://discussions.apple.com/community/professional_applications/final_cut_stud io
    Select "refine this list" in the blue button to nake it easier to find DVDSP related issues.

  • Battery Wear-Level overnight feels too High!

    Hi,
    Usually i rarely use battery (always put the battery out after charging it) except when i need to take my 4-months-old B480 laptop outside (which is rarely happened)
    Yesterday i leave my battery with ac adapter plugged-in while downloading a large file from internet, i set start charging threshold at 75% and stop at 95% (as many people said it's better not to fully charge the battery), and on the next day i see my battery wear-level became 13% O.o while cycle count is only 5
    I think it's too high for a one-night charging, my old laptop (non-Lenovo) didn't gets this high even when i leave it with ac adapter for days.
    Is this wear-level normal for a one-night charging? (at-least for lenovo laptop that is)
    Does warranty covers an abnormal battery wear-level?
    PS: one of the reason i choose lenovo laptop is because it has customizable-battery charging threshold feature which many people said can be used to prolonged battery lifespan(minimizing wear-level by not fully-charging it and not discharging it too low) even when used with ac adapter, while not many other brands have this kind of feature.

    hi AdamN,
    A usual sign of an imminent battery failure is when it wears out the charge in an abnormal rate (battery goes down to less than 20% overnight after a full charge when unit is off or in sleep state). Sometimes heat can also be a factor to shorten the battery life as discussed in this article.
    To further test the health of the battery, You can try Passmark's BatteryMon. If the battery is failing, you may contact Lenovo for a battery replacement. Support phone list here.
    Hope this helps.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

  • MSI R7950 TF 3GD5/OC BE too high stock voltage

    Hi, this is my first post so please be gentle with me
    I just bought a MSI R7950 TF 3GD5/OC BE video card which is 960mhz stock speed, but I found out that this card has a too high stock voltage which displays 1.18v in GPUZ and 1.25v in afterburner. I don't think the card can last long with such a high voltage so I want to lower it.
    I try to adjust the voltage in afterburner, it seems it changes in the software (the slide did change). But GPUZ still displays the same voltage.
    Can anyone help me with this?
    Thanks.

    Quote from: tails on 07-April-13, 22:29:57
    Thanks for the reply.
    I've found the solution for that. I downloaded the version 3.00beta9 of afterburner and now it can change the vcore.
    I changed the vcore from 1.25 to 1.05v. Now the card is running at 1050mhz, 57degree with 60% fan speed, cool and quiet. Before was 75 degree and 80% fan speed.
    I'm satisfied now.
    Ive got Afterburner 2.31, its allows undervolting as well. But problem is that in boost mode new values are ignored and back to default. So in that case cant see any sense in doing that. Is that changed in ver 3?
    D.

  • Are JPEG 3504x2336 pixel pictures too high resolution for the photo books?

    Hi,
    I am done creating my photo book and I am ready to order, but I'd like to know if my pictures are too high resolution. They are professional wedding pictures so they are 7.4 mb each JPEG 3504x2336 pixel pictures. (Last time, I printed through MyPublisher but the pages with multiple pictures didn't turn out well and they said it was because the resolution was too high so when they compressed the file for the pages with multiple pictures it didn't turn out well.) Will I run into the same problem if I print directly through Iphoto?
    If I do need to lower the resolution, how do I do it, given that I've aready created the book?
    Thanks for any help you can give me!

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
    When you order the book it will be compressed and a PDF will be created. That PDF is what gets uploaded to Apple (via Kodak) for printing. So the best way to check your book before ordering is to create a PDF, then inspect it. Chances are, what you see in your PDF is what you will get printed.
    To do this, select your book and do File > Print. You'll get an "Assembling book" progress bar. That can take several minutes. When done, you get the Print Dialog box. Click the PDF button and choose "Save as PDF..." Choose a name and location for the file (the Desktop is convenient) and Save. Then switch to the Finder and open that PDF in Preview. You might select a page or two and do a test print yourself, to see if the quality looks good. The PDF saves you from having to print out the whole book yourself to check for errors.
    Regards.

  • SCOM2012 Alert: SQL 2008 DB Average Wait Time & Recompilationis too high

    WE have SCOM 2012sp1 CU3 updated.
    I receive the below critical alerts from SQL servers continuously, please help me to resolve this issue.
    SQL 2008 DB Average Wait Time is too high
       SQL DB 2008 SQL Recompilation is too high

    I don't know about anyone else but overriding those monitors and rules didn’t work for me, I had to override<o:p></o:p>
    SQL Re-Compilation monitor for SQL 2012 DB Engine<o:p></o:p>
    SQL Re-Compilation monitor for SQL 2008 DB Engine<o:p></o:p>
    Average Wait Time monitor for SQL 2012 DB<o:p></o:p>
    Average Wait Time monitor for SQL 2008 DB<o:p></o:p>
    Now I am wondering if other monitors are valid as well in particular I have multiple alerts for<o:p></o:p>
    Buffer Cache Hit Ratio monitor for SQL 2008 DB Engine is too low<o:p></o:p>
    Page Life Expectancy (s) for 2008 DB Engine is too low<o:p></o:p>
    is anyone else seeing these issues as well?

  • When burning a bluray I get this error message: Total bitrate is too high near time = 4.760000

    When burning a bluray I get this error message: Total bitrate is too high near time = 4.760000
    The video is encoded with sonic cinevison as avchd file and one AC3 file.

    What can I do to avoid it?
    Well, about the only thing you can do to solve "bitrate too high" errors is to lower the bitrate.

  • Too High Bit rate error no matter how much reduce it

    After Exporting an HDV 1080i 16:9 3 sequences from FCP via
    compressor at Best SD DVD 90 minutes, 16:9, and burning two DVD-Rs that work, now DVDSP keeps giving me Video Bit Rate too high error and stops building shortly after starts. And no matter how much I lower bit rate won't do it! HELP

    I think - and see if you agree - that I exported using a compressor bit rate setting of 6.0 and max of 7.5 on the first 56 min sucessful sequence build/burn, and then thought I could go higher on the second export so goosed the max bit rate to 9.0 since there were occassional big bits of motion. So now on the other two sequences DVD SP won't adjust that previous compression rate, and instead I will have to sacrifice the audio quality (use Dolby only)
    to get it to build. I certainly DON't want to wait 26 to 28 hours again for each sequence to export!! Does that sound right?

Maybe you are looking for