Idoc structure not displying in XPATH at Receiver Determination..!!! Urgent

Hi All,
Doing Idoc to File Scenerio,
In the receiver determination, I need to select the XPATH from the Idoc structure and by based on the GLN number which is coming in one of the segment, I need to pass to different receivers.
Problem here is Iam not able to see the Idoc structure in the XPATH to provide the condition.
But when doing File to Idoc scenarios, Iam able to see the File structure.
Any idea why IDoc structure is not displaying over here??
Its a bit urgent for me..
Waiting for your replys.
Thanks&Regards
Seema.

Hi,
This will help you now
Hi,
If you get the following msg while selecting the BS in Receiver Determination and if you are unable to view the Structure of the Source
"Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system"
1) Open ID-----Double click on Business system that which u are using in the scenario
2) Check whether you are able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB
3) If it is not there means goto SLD----Open the Technical System of R/3 by choosing Web as ABAp type
4) Click on Installed Products TAB
5) Click on Add New product and add your Product of the SWC whcih you are using for developement and Save it
6) Then goto Business systems TAB in the same Technical systems window and click on the Business System appears in the window.
7) Click on Installed products and Check the check box of your Product and then finally save that.
Now you should be able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB in ID
Regards
Seshagiri

Similar Messages

Reg:Xpath in receiver determination

Hello,
My message strcture looks like below.
Record
Level1
item
field1
Level2
item
field2
Level3
item
field3
There can be multiple items for each level.
Here goes my condition.
I have to send the message to the receiver system "A" only when filed2 value is same across all items under level2 i.e. if there are three items under level2, then field2 should have the same value across the items.
Can you please let me know how do we impliment this in the reciver determination step using xpath?
Regards,
Rahul

Rahul,
Your scenario can be achieved using Enhanced Receiver Determination. Using Xpath in Receiver Determination might become complex for your condition.
Refer below links for Enhanced Receiver Determination.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3343
Regards,
Geetha

XPath in receiver determination: Check content of elements that exist 0..n

Hi all,
I have a simple requirement in a receiver determination. In the structure of the XML message, there is a node "STATUS" with an element STATUS_CODE. This STATUS node can appear 0 or 9999 times.
I want to check if there is ANY STATUS with STATUS_CODE = "0", and if so, the message should be sent to a certain receiver. How to to that?
Will that be the solution: (//STATUS/STATUS_CODE = 0)?
Thanks,
CHRIS

> So it seems to me that the operator != can't be used to check a 1...n element? What might be the reason for this?
I am not sure how != works, it is not documented well.
I suppose NE means: does not exist.
So if any node STATUS_CODE with value 1 exists, then the result is false.
If you want an existence check if this, you should apply this:
//STATUS [STATUS_CODE != "1"] EX
See also:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/ab/13bf7191e73a4fb3560e767a2525fd/frameset.htm
(scroll to the bottom)
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination

Use of range in case of XPATH for receiver determination.

Hi Experts,
I need to achieve the following using standard receiver determination.
The material number in the source message structure has to lie within a perticular range and that should decide the receiver of the message.
For example:
MT_SRC
|---- Ele1
|----
MaterialNo.
If MaterialNo is between 100000100 and 100001000 then it should be sent to BS_TGT1 else it should be sent to BS_TGT2.
Is it possible to achieve this using the standard conditional receiver determination using XPATH and if yes, how exactly?
Regards,
Amol

Hi Amol,
I think its possible. Never tried though for a range.
Go through this link and check out what is described under the section "Notes Regarding the Use of XPath Expressions"
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a513f2632c332ce10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
I am not sure whether it will work for two conditions though, i.e. for a range( Greater than 100000100, less than 100001000).
Just try and let us know.
Regards,
Sanjeev.

Using Xpath in Receiver Determination for greater than 500

Hi,
I am trying to use Xpath in the receiver Determination step and I want to check a field which is at item level and comes multiple times(0-unbounded) greater than 500.I tried with different options per SDN blogs,Xpath functions,but still I couldn't able to get what i am trying.I want to process the message when "quantity" is greater than 500,else I want to ignore the message with no errors.
I gave like this /p1: /LIST/item[quantity>499] EX
item loop is 0-unbounded and I need to check for every quantity.I selected the check box multi line as well.
I played around different options,but still did not get what I am looking for.
please suggest in this regard ,how I need to give the expression.
Thank you,
Sri

Hi,
For validating that the item field is occuring more than 500 times you need to choose the
2.The exact XPath would be in your case *(/p1: /LIST/itemquantity[499]EX)*
This means if the 500 th occurance of the item exists then the condition satisfies that is always true for 500 and above occurance of the item.
Please revert if the suggestion proves to be helpful.
cheers,
Abhishek.
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 10:55 PM
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 11:02 PM
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 11:08 PM

Customizing XPATH in Receiver Determination

Hello,
I am using this blog to write conditions /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination and accordingly call the receiver (either Receiver_1 or Receiver_2), never to call both the receivers simultaneously
I have a sample source message like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ConsumerDetails>
 <UserId>91200024:123456</UserId> To check if UserId starts with 91200024: or not
 <Date>20111301161459</Date> To check if length of Date is 14 or not
 <Billing>RC</Billing> To check if Billing has value RC/ SB or not
 <Type>SE</Type> To check if Type has value SE/ CWE or not
</ConsumerDetails>
Accordingly wrote the below conditions:
Receiver_1 (Conditions working fine):
UserId (MiddleOperator --> ContainsPattern) --> 91200024:*
/ConsumerDetails[(string-length(Date)) = "14"] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[(Billing = "RC") or (Billing = "SB")] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[(Type = "SE") or (Type = "CWE")] --> EX
Receiver_2 (Conditions not working; except 1st condition):
/ConsumerDetails[not(starts-with(UserId,'91200024:'))] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[(string-length(Date)) != "14"] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[(Billing != "RC") or (Billing != "SB")] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[(Type != "SE") or (Type != "CWE")] --> EX
Only Conditions for Receiver_1 are working fine; those for Receiver_2 are not. Can anybody please provide correct conditions to be written in the Condition Editor?
~Thanks.

Hello,
Have you tried using the condition as mentioned below:
/ConsumerDetails[not((string-length(Date)) = "14")] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[not((Billing = "RC")) or not( (Billing = "SB"))] --> EX
/ConsumerDetails[not((Type = "SE")) or not((Type = "CWE"))] --> EX
i.e. use not() instead of '!' ??
-Rahul

XPATH in receiver determination

Hi,
We need to dynamically determine the receiver service based on the payload.
In the extended service editor we have succesfully used a simple XPATH expression to point out a specific field of the payload (just like using af context object) containing the service name.
However, in most cases the service name is a substring of a field of the payload and furthermore a constant is to be added to give the full service name. We have tried to solve this problem using the XPATH functions 'concat', 'string' and 'substring'. But as soon as we add just the simplest function to the XPATH expression, the receiver determination fails (unable to process the XPATH).
We have tested the XPATH with the actual message using XML Spy, and it works well.
The XPATH expression is: "concat('SAPR3_', substring(string(/p1:receipt/p1:identity), 2, 5))"
Any hints?
Regards
Lars

Hi Lars,
I just noticed, that you are talking about extended Service Editor - not a Condition - so my answer above is obviously rubbish.
What remains true is that the XPath you use has to result in a node, than the nodes string is taken as a service.
So I am afraid there is no easy solution for your problem...
If you do not have too many receivers and this list is rather static, you could of course use conditions in the receiver determination - something like:
receiver service = SAPR3_b if /.../ = abc
but this is of course not really applicable if the list of possible receivers gets too long.
Another possibility would be to use the substring as a receiver within the configuration. So take it from the payload in the receiver determination and use this 'service' for interface determination and receiver agreement.
Than, within the receiver agreement you can exchange this name by the 'real' name in the header mapping (which is performed as the very last step in the pipeline). Since you have a receiver agreement per receiver anyway, you would not have to create additional configuration objects. The downfall is of course, that to 'read' the configuration (or the message monitoring) one has to know about this mapping trick...

XPATH and Receiver Determination

In Reference to forum thread : Conditions in Xpath (Receiver determination)
Suppose I have MT as
MT_Pickfile
 |_Header
 |_Body
 |_Trailer
And i need to check;
(field3 = "100" or field3 = "200" or field3 = "300" ) and(field5 = "AA" or field5 = "BB" or field5 = "CC")
field3 is in Header and field5 is in Body
I tried giving
/p1:MT_Pickfile/Header[(field3 = "100" or field3 = "200" or field3 = "300" )] and /p1:MT_Pickfile/Body[(field5 = "AA" or field5 = "BB" or field5 = "CC")] EX
It doesnt work. But then if both field3 and field5 are in Header then it works (as had been the case in the above mentioned thread which Stefan Grube replied to) i.e. to say
/p1:MT_Pickfile/Header[(field3 = "100" or field3 = "200" or field3 = "300" )] and [(field5 = "AA" or field5 = "BB" or field5 = "CC")] EX
Can anybody put in their suggestions ?
Thanx in Advance,
ShaBZ

Hi Shabarish,
It is not possible to have and or or outside the brackets [].
Try following:
/p1:MT_Pickfile[(Header/field3 = "100" or Header/field3 = "200" or Header/field3 = "300" ) and Body/field5 = "AA" or Body/field5 = "BB" or Body/field5 = "CC")]
Another idea:
Write two lines in receiver determination (use insert expression):
1. line:
/p1:MT_Pickfile/Header[(field3 = "100" or field3 = "200" or field3 = "300" )]
2. line
/p1:MT_Pickfile/Body[(field5 = "AA" or field5 = "BB" or field5 = "CC")]
Hope that helps
Stefan

Conditions using xpath in Receiver determination

How to write conditions using xpath in receiver determaination. Please provide few examples.
Regards,
Suresh.

hi
Defining Conditions
You also have the option of specifying the conditions to be applied when forwarding a message to the receiver(s) in a receiver determination.
Generally, a condition relates to the contents of a message; if a specified condition is fulfilled for a particular payload element (the corresponding element has a certain value, for example), then the message is forwarded to the specified receiver(s).
● If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to a receiver, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert New Condition () and call the condition editor by using the input help ().
● If you want to specify a new condition for forwarding the message to multiple receivers, in the table in the Display/Edit Receiver Determination editor in the Configured Receivers frame, choose Insert Line After Selection ( ) and call the condition editor by using the input help ().
In the condition editor, you can select an element from the message payload and specify a value with which the value of this element is to be compared at runtime.
check the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/67/49767669963545a071a190b77a9a23/content.htm
note:reward points if solution found helpfull.....
regards
chandrakanth.k

Context object not visible in configuration (for receiver determination)

Hi,
I've created a context object and depending on that I want to forward the message to a specific receiver. But when in that pop-up window for the receiver determination I cannot find the context object. I can only find the technical context objects defined by SAP.
Do you have a solution for that?
Regards
Volker

Hi Volker,
you can solve your task by using a <a href="/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16 Receiver Determination</a>
Regards,
Udo

Mapping Issue: Target IDoc structure not getting created properly

Hi Experts,
I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as [SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true] and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as [1,2,3,4,5]. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as [1,2,3,4] but it gets values as [2,3,4,5] because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
1. Target Structure:
    IDoc - No TMPN Node
    IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
    IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
    IDoc - 1 TMPN node
Condition put on target TMPN_Node ---> (created only 4 times due to condition)
2. Mapping Skeleton:
Values coming from Q1 (SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true) --->
                                                                                \===>FORMATBYEXAMPLE+SPLITBYVALUE==> TMPN-F0 [2]
                                                                                /                                                                              TMPN-F0 [3]
Values coming from Q2 (1,2,3,4,5) -
>                                                                               TMPN-F0 [4]
                                                                                TMPN-F0 [5]
Where F0 is the field which is created when TMPN Node is created. So, if TMPN gets created 6 times, the F0 gets created 6 times.
Please let me know if there is an alternative to this problem. How can I have values as [1,2,3,4] in field F0 instead of [2,3,4,5]

hi,
i got the email.
as i can see your mapping seams to be rigth, but there is sometrhing i dont get. in a previuos post you said:
I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as 1,2,3,4,5. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as 1,2,3,4 but it gets values as 2,3,4,5 because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
1. Target Structure:
IDoc - No TMPN Node
IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
IDoc - 1 TMPN node
lets asume you define as default value "1"
now, the result of the formatByExample taking the example you sent to me is:
1,T1,T2,T3,T4 without context change. and the result of the function splitByValue should be what you are specting.
but its something that is not clear still,
could you post the result of the mapWithDefault? i think your problem is there.
Rgds
RP-.

Receiver Determination Condition and XPATH

Hi Everyone,
I have a receiver determination with conditions and can not figure out why one thing is working, and the other isn't.
As suggested in the following forum post, XPATH and RECEIVER DETERMINATION, I had to do the following to my XPATH expression to make it work. The full xpath expression is this:
(/p1:RenExtract_MT/Detail/CompanyCode = 9740)
where
p1 = http://company.com/xi/fin/
but whenever I put in a condition it could not find a receiver.
Hoewver, when I did this:
//CompanyCode
it worked.
I did everything through the condition editor, many times, and didn't type anything in myself. Is there a length limitation or something (I removed some data in here, the expression is really longer!).
Any ideas?
Peter

Hi Peter,
I do not have an explanation for this wired behaviour.
But I can assure your, that your working solution, the //something expression is a good one and not inferior to a solution using an explicit, absolute path.
Why is that: I can remember some benchmarks, where the //something expression always outperformed the other one.
Regards
Gregor

Interface Mapping not listing in the Extended Reciever Determination

Hi,
The Interface Mapping is not shown in my Extended receiver determination. I have created and activated the IM & MM using the MT - Receivers within the SAP Basis.
Regards
Unni

Hi,
You can only choose the Interface mapping for the Enhanced recevier determination in the extended tab of Receiver determination. & I dont see the Interface mapping in the select list.
Where do I have to check for the proper outbound message???
Regards

File2file Receiver Determination Problem

Hi All,
I am doing File2file my IR part is activated in ID part I creater 2 CC in Business Service sender with FCC and Receiver with Normal XMLfile after this step Iam trying to create my Receiver Determination Its showing that NO OBJECTS FOUND in interface and Namesapce column.
Regards,
Eswar.

In case your doubt is still not cleared:
When you create Receiver Determination (ID --> New --> receiver Dtermination), in the pop-up window you select the Sender Business Service and the corresponding Sender Message/ Service Interface .....now this message interrface should be first assigned to the Business Service.....now after we create the RD, we enter the corresponding Receiver Service/ System thereby creating the first relationship between the Sender and Receiver Service/ System in XI/ PI.
The above selection holds true for any scenario developed in XI/ PI.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface

Hello everybody,
I want to use dynamic receiver determination for a synchron scenario.
The problem is, that the interface 'ReceiverDetermination' (http://sap.com/xi/XI/System SAP BASIS 7.00) is a asynchron interface.
This leads to an error when activating the Interface-Mapping (synch source Interface -> asynch destination Interface ReceiverDetermination)
Is there a way to use the dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface?
Thanks a lot,
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
I guess your scenario is not possible ASIS, since XI doesn't support 1:n for sync interfaces (and even if your mapping condition reduces it to 1:1, actually it is still 1:n, since your receiver list is unbounded).
Theoretically, you could make it work with BPM, though.
But I've never worked with a Receiver Determination Step reading from an enhanced receiver determination in ID (though there should be no problems).
Use sync async bridge, then use receiver determination step to obtain the receiver from an enhanced Receiver Determination. Pay attention that this enhanced receiver determination is a dummy one, using a mapping from your async abstract interface to the ReceiverDetermination interface. Once your mapping has determined the receiver, the enhanced receiver determination will return that receiver to the Receiver Determination step in the BPM. Then use this receiver in the sync send step (in mode receiver from receiver list, not from context).
The receiver determination of the actual sync send step may be a standard one, with the several receivers there (even if there are several there, at the moment of the sending, only one will be used).
Maybe it will work, maybe not.
Just try it.
Regards,
Henrique.

Idoc structure not displying in XPATH at Receiver Determination..!!! Urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for