IFRS issue

Hi all SAP gurus,
We have an issue with IFRS.
As of 01.01.2008 our customer has gone live. For IFRS purposes a new depreciation area (25) is defined and UF ledger group is assigned to this depreciation area. UF is the non-leading ledger which is defined for IFRS purposes.
However during the legacy data transfer, the wrong values were transferred to the area 25.
Now our customer wants to correct the IFRS values of assets as 31.12.2009.
1. Corrections will be made on APC. ( for example 100 TRY will be corrected as 110 TRY)
2. corrections will ben made on depreciation values and depreciation terms (useful life etc.)
How can we handle this issue? Any helpful answer will be appreciated.
Regards.
Edited by: ahmetseker on Jul 6, 2010 1:00 PM

any suggestions?

Similar Messages

  • SCC4 standard currency change

    Hi experts,
    We want to upgrade SAP system form 4.7 to 6.0.
    We set standard currency 'USD' in SCC4 in 4.7 version.
    But for IFRS issue I need set group currency 'EUR' in FI document after upgrading,
    So I need to change standard currency by using SCC4.
    My question is any transation or report will be affectd?
    John

    HI,
    If you are using Group Currency type for your company code in transaction OB22 then yes USD will no longer be there but the change one which is EUR..when you execute financial statements based on gorup currency will be affected.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • BPC 10NW: Connectivity issues with environment copied from IFRS KIT

    Hi BPC Gurus,
    We are on SAP BPC 10NW SP04.
    We had installed IFRS Kit. We then copied IFRS Kit (without transactions) to another environment (TBSC_DEMO). We have then
    modified members of all the dimensions and successfully processed it.
    We are trying to log on to Consolidation Model in BPC-Excel to create Transformations etc ... however, we are getting error "the number of bytes available is inconsistant with the HTTP content - lenght header.  There may have been a network error or the client may be sending invalid requests'. However, it gets connected to 'ownership' and 'rate' models without any issues.
    Also, if we try to create an Input Form and/or Report from BPC-Admin, and drag any dimension in Row / Column it throws an error - 'unhandled exception has occured'.
    NOTE: It was given to understand from one of the SAP consultant that IFRS kit has some 'KNOWN issues' about 'authorizations and/or security features. could you please let us know the resolution at the earliest?
    ALSO, If by any chance we are able to conenct to BPC-Excel, it shows only one dimension (ACCOUNT). Please see the attached screen shot for more details.
    Are we missing any settings?
    Please assist.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

    Hi BPC Gurus,
    We are on SAP BPC 10NW SP04.
    We had installed IFRS Kit. We then copied IFRS Kit (without transactions) to another environment (TBSC_DEMO). We have then
    modified members of all the dimensions and successfully processed it.
    We are trying to log on to Consolidation Model in BPC-Excel to create Transformations etc ... however, we are getting error "the number of bytes available is inconsistant with the HTTP content - lenght header.  There may have been a network error or the client may be sending invalid requests'. However, it gets connected to 'ownership' and 'rate' models without any issues.
    Also, if we try to create an Input Form and/or Report from BPC-Admin, and drag any dimension in Row / Column it throws an error - 'unhandled exception has occured'.
    NOTE: It was given to understand from one of the SAP consultant that IFRS kit has some 'KNOWN issues' about 'authorizations and/or security features. could you please let us know the resolution at the earliest?
    ALSO, If by any chance we are able to conenct to BPC-Excel, it shows only one dimension (ACCOUNT). Please see the attached screen shot for more details.
    Are we missing any settings?
    Please assist.
    Regards,
    Rashmi

  • IFRIC 1 in IFRS ---- Is it possible in SAP to discount a liability figure

    Hi All,
    As per IFRIC 1 in IFRS: To measure decommissioning provision, the periodic unwinding of discounting shall be recognised in income statement as finance cost as it occurs.
    Is it possible in SAP to discount a liability figure and charge to interest the annual addition for unwinding of discount?

    No, sorry, I mean I copied the data vector (model.getDataVector()) to an other vector, not the model. And the problem is that the serialized data did not reflect the changes if I just change vecor values, so this is why I reinstantiated the full model. I think this is rather a java io issue, not a swing issue, it seems any object I serialize will not be refreshed if I just change some attributes in it and not the full variable. Can this be true?
    On the othe hand
    table.setAutoCreateColumnsFromModel( false );
    quite simplified my framework, which is great!
    The old framework looked like this:
    public BaseTblModel resetModel() {                    
    removeListeners(tm);
    removeListeners(tb);          
    tm = new TrackTblModel();     
    tb.setModel(tm)
    reinstallEditors(tb)
    addListeners(tm);
    addListeners(tb);     
    return tm;
    Now with table.setAutoCreateColumnsFromModel( false ); it looks like as simple as:
    public BaseTblModel resetModel() {                    
    tm = new TrackTblModel();     
    tb.setModel(tm)
    return tm;
    So it would be better If I could leave out this step as well, because I do it just because of the mentioned serialization problems.

  • XRef Issue

    Hi ,
    We are facing an issue with XRef inour Planning Application. We have three PlanTypes and trying to get data from One PlanType to Other Plan Type.
    The issue which we are facing with XRef is as follows:
    The following are dimensions in Source Plan Type(Workforce):
    Account,Scenario,Version,Year,Period,Employee,Currency,Entity,State/Province,LegalEntity
    The following are dimensions in Target Plan Type(BasicExpense):
    Account,Scenario,Version,Year,Period,Currency,Entity,LegalEntity,Project,Product,Channel,Ledger
    Scenario 1:
    We are getting data in Target Plan Type (Basic Expense) when we input data in Source Plan Type (Workforce) as shown below:
    Input Data at Source Plan Type (Workforce) is as follows:
    Account Scenario Version Year Period Employee Currency Enity State/Province LegalEntity
    HA_8000001 QF1 Version1 FY11 Jan Employee Local 10011 State/Province CA100 200$
    Output Data at Target Plan Type (BasicExpense) is as follows:
    Account Scenario Version Year Period Currency Entity LegalEntity Project Product Channel Ledger
    HA_8000001 QF1 Version1 FY11 Jan Local 10011 CA100 0000 HP_000000 HC_00000 IFRS Planning Ledger 200$
    Scenario 2:
    We are not getting data in Target Plan Type (Basic Expense) when we input data in Source Plan Type (Workforce) as shown below:
    Input Data at Source Plan Type (Workforce) is as follows:
    Account Scenario Version Year Period Employee Currency Enity State/Province LegalEntity
    HA_8000001 QF1 Version1 FY11 Jan 12664 Local 10011 State/Province CA100 200$
    Output Data at Target Plan Type (BasicExpense) is as follows:
    Account Scenario Version Year Period Currency Entity LegalEntity Project Product Channel Ledger
    HA_8000001 QF1 Version1 FY11 Jan Local 10011 CA100 0000 HP_000000 HC_00000 IFRS Planning Ledger <NoData>
    Can anyone suggest us how to overcome this problem.
    The version which we are using Hyperion Planning is as follows:
    Hyperion Planning : 11.1.1.3
    Planning Application Type : Classic
    Thanks,
    Suresh.

    One of the drawbacks of using xref is that it requires the block you are copying data to to exist. If you turn on the createblockoneq in the calc script, it will solve your problem if it is indeed a block creation issue. However, this dramatically slows down the calculation.
    In the past, I have normally exported the data from one plan type and imported to the target plan type to speed up the process. If these are xref function created by planning, you can tell planning to NOT create them with UDAs. If you are using a newer version of Essbase/Planning, you can explore the XWRITE function. This does the same thing, but you won't have the block creation issue because you are fixing on the source, and SENDING data to the target. XREF fixes on the target and PULLS data from the source.
    There is an article explaining this in more detail at http://in2hyperion.com/post/2012/05/02/XWRITE_XREF.aspx.
    Kyle Goodfriend
    http://www.in2hyperion.com
    h4. Please make sure to assign helpful/answered to responses if applicable - it rewards those who help and benefits the user community.

  • "Invalid column name" when restoring SAP DM IFRS Starter Kit

    I want to share an issue that we came across when restoring the SAP Disclosure Management IFRS Starter Kit. Namely when trying to restore it on an environment we got the following error:
    Server Error in '/' Application.
    Invalid column name 'AccountExpirationDate'.
    Invalid column name 'PasswordChangedDate'.
    Invalid column name 'LastSuccessfulLoginDate'.
    In our case, after getting this error we tried restoring the SK on SAP Disclosure Management SP06 and it turned out to work ok so hope that this solves it for anyone else stuck at the same

    Hi Rajneesh,
    Check whether you have both the row-axis and column-axis of the input template through 'edit report'.
    Probably your input template has some member dimensions missing in your template.
    We have faced the same problem before and corrected it.
    This error occurs sometimes when we create a input template by clearing defining the row & column axis in the template but afterwards try some EPMOlapmember in any axis by deleting the original report elements.
    So check the input template once again. I think you will track the error.
    Regards,
    Bishwajit

  • Comparison parallel ledger app. with parallel account app. in terms of IFRS

    Hİ ALL,
    we would like to know what is the advantages of using parallel ledger approach for transition to IFRS in SAP instead of using parallel account approach?
    thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Currently I am making a similar review - account based versus parallel ledger. The pro's of the of parallel ledger are the con's of account based and vice versa:
    Parallel ledger - Pros
    - G/L accounts: fewer G/L accounts required (so opportunity to reduce SCOA), same G/L accounts are shared across all ledgers - unified reporting
    - Fiscal year variant: company codes with different fiscal year variants assigned to a separate ledger, facilitating consolidated reporting
    - Posting period variant: postings to ledgers can be separately controlled by assigning a separate posting period variant for the ledger
    - Carry forward: no need to maintain separate retained earnings accounts per accounting principle
    - Currency valuations and translations: Automated postings updated to appropriate ledgers based on the assignment to relevant accounting principles
    - Adjustment and value postings: Adjustment and value postings, such as reclassification are automatically posted to the appropriate ledgers
    - Standard reports: standard reports are executed by ledger
    Parallel ledger - Cons
    - The data volume could increase as a result ofmaintaining parallel ledgers (see SAP note 820495 for tips on resolving the issue)
    - Parallel ledger is a new concept at my customer so it requires a complete revamp of system configuation, with all the impact on processes and people, all old local reports (using special ledger) will become obsolete.
    Hope this helps. By the way: we have chosen to move from account-based to parallel ledger despite the implementation effort.
    Best regards,
    Alexander Min

  • WIP according local GAAP vs IFRS - only one result analysis key

    Dear experts,
    I am faced with the following issue. We use WBS-elements for long running activities. We set result analysis key on WBS-element for periodic WIP calculation. The actual result analysis key is set up according local GAAP.
    Now we want to implement parallel accounting according IFRS. Here we can use percentage of completion for valuation of our project(s).
    How can we handle two methods of WIP calculation? We can only set one resulat analysis key on WBS element?
    How do you handle this issue.
    Thanks for your reply in advance
    Regards,
    Butch

    Thanks for the quick feedback.
    Maybe some additional information:
    01 - IFRS (real time link with FI)
    02 parallell currency deprec area
    20 - LOCAL GAAP
    50 - Grants IFRS value (investment measure support area)  linked realtime to FI
    51 parallel currency deprec area of 50
    60 - Grants Local GAAP
    I already checked the SAP library and the SDN forum, but could not find anywhere how to set up the depreciation area(Grants LOCAL GAAP) to which the investment measure is not directly linked to (not the support area (50) in Tr ANVEST).
    Is it possible with only one investement key to fill the IFRS (50) & Local GAAP (60) value investment depreciation area and still depreciate them in different ways?
    Thanks again!
    Kr,
    Roeland

  • IFRS requirement in HFM

    Hi,
    We have a client requirement which should allow to enter different methods for IFRS and IGAAP accounts in their application.The issue is that they have different percentage owenrship scenario for IFRS and IGAAP. Example : Company B is subsidiary of company A (A is holding 50% shares of B resulting global consolidation method)in IGAAP but A and B are joint ventures in IFRS(resulting proportionate consolidation method).We tried different possibilities by having multiple hierarchy in Entity ;also in Scenario dimension but this does not resolve the client issue
    Would appreciate if anyone can throw light how to handle this in HFM.
    Thanks .

    Look, if you place one entity (say Company1) under two different parents (e.g. IFRS_Group and IGAAP entities), then you can enter different POWN and consol Method for each of the parents.
    In your case you would create CompanyA and CompanyB under IFRS_Group like this:
    IGAAP_Group.CompanyA Method=Holding, POWN = 100%
    IGAAP_Group.CompanyB Mehtod=Global, POWN=50%
    IFRS_Group.CompanyA Method=Proportional, POWN=50%
    IFRS_Group.CompanyB Method=Proportional, POWN=50%

  • IFRS Solution for JV Accounting - Oil and Gas

    Hi
    My client is upstream sector Oil and Gas industry. I am into IS Oil. They are moving for IFRS. I know what all changes are required in SAP FI (like parllel ledger is required, new depreciation area is required, etc)
    But i am not aware of SAP JVA. Please tell me which additional functionality is required for SAP JVA for implementing IFRS into SAP JVA.
    Please help or send some link.
    Edited by: Meenu_ND on Dec 22, 2010 3:21 PM

    Having a similar issue , please share the solution once you find one

  • How to implement IFRS requirement?

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    Good day.
    May I seek your help and opinion regarding IFRS requirement please.
    How do we setup create billing based on actual Good Receive by Customer?
    Background :
    Current setting in SAP, Billing date is EQUAL to PGI Date. It means that our sales recognition is based on Good Issue from our warehouse.
    But base on local requirement and IFRS, we have to record our sales (sales recognition) based on actual good receive by customer.
    So with that can you help advise how are we going to set this up in SAP? Please help.
    Thank you very much in advance for your kind attention and assistance.

    Hi Expert,
    Please refer to the below link for implement IFRS in SAP.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/IFRS/ImplementingIFRSatSAPQandA
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • ASKBN Issue

    Hi,
    We are using Book and IFRS depreciation areas in Fixed asset module, both areas post the values into FI module. But for acquisition(F-90) and Scrapping(ABAVN) and sale(F-92), system posts the transaction into Book depreciation area, next we have to execute the ASKBN(Periodical posting) transaction for the postings in IFRS depreciation area. But the problem here is the GL master which is to use for IFRS posting, tax category selected and posting without tax allowed is not activated, so system doesnu2019t find any tax code while processing the entry hence it is throwing the error. Now I have rectified the GL master settings and want to process the posting through ASKBN.
    How can I process the entries which are already generated in Asset module?
    Rgds
    Murali. N

    Hi Murali,
    Sorry, I couldn't help you beyond this point.  My system is not on new gl and I'm not able to replicate the scenario.  However, I handled this issue couple of years back and not able to recollect how.  Surely, this is doable.
    Let me try to get some iDES access and try to do this.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Investemnt measure relavant assets not added for IFRS Dep.

    Hi All,
    We are added in asset accounting for IFRS Depreciation area,but we are facing problem is investemnt measure relavant assets not addedfor IFRS Dep.Please help me out this Issue.
    Regards
    Raju

    Dear Raju,
    there is a special treatment for AuC's assigned to a investment measure when creating new depreciation area. Please see note 317806.
    Best Regards,
    Blaz.

  • IAS/IFRS standards

    Recently several countries raised the need to provide tools and guidance on how to handle IAS/IFRS reporting standards in Business One.
    This wide and complex area is solved different ways in ERP applications. This thread is created to discuss potential solutions, issues and feedback on IAS/IFRS handling.
    Note: Some requirements might be relevant also for other reporting standards such US GAAP, HGB,... . Therefore comments from these areas are also appreciated.

    Hello Srinath,
    Thank you for your comments. Let me try to answer your questions.
    In general before changing the structure of CoA or re-grouping of the G/L accounts it is necessary for company to analyze the  differences between the local legislation and IFRS. Then evaluate the potential impact of a business cases to the accounting. If this is done then company can decide how specific u201Cproblematicu201D transactions should be recorded to the financial books.
    We tried to point out in the document that company which operates in a local legislation as well as would like to provide statements according to the IFRS will face to certain level of parallelism in its accounting books. It means that the same transaction can be reflected differently for local legislation and IFRS purposes in the accounting books.
    In general there are three types of the transactions:
    1. Same approach and valuation
         => One posting to common accounts or in all ledgers
    Example: Incoming invoice for external activities
    Payables  (Credit) X
    Tax (Debit) X
    Expenses (Debit) X
    In most of the cases the transaction is presented the same way for local legislation and IFRS
    2. Same approach but different valuation
         => a separate posting to local and IFRS accounts or ledgers
    Example: Depreciation or reserves for pensions
    Local legislation
    Accruals (Credit) X
    Pensions (Debit) X
    IFRS     
    Accruals (Credit) Y
    Pensions (Debit) Y
    Two complete postings, made separately for each u201Clegislationu201D.
    3. Different approaches
    => Only one posting to local or IFRS accounts or ledgers
    Posting only relevant for IFRS: Financial Leasing
    Financial lease (Credit) Y
    Financial lease depreciation (Debit) Y     
    Posting only relevant for local GAAP: Provisions for expenses
    Provision for Expenses (Credit) X
    Expenses (Debit) X
    So it is hard to say whether the re-implementation is needed. It is very dependent on the company business nature, differences between the local legislation and IFRS and also, companyu2019s flexibility to incorporate the required changes into internal processes.
    All these points affects at the end the final decision about the solution.
    Best Regards,
    Martin Slavik
    SAP Business One Solution Manager

  • Using IFRS Starter kit to build a quick POC for Client

    Hello Friends,
    As IFRS starter kit comes with a packaged solution, I was planning to use the same to build a quick POC for the client. However, I am seeing issues with basic functions like Data Loads. I updated the Dimensions members with the client specific data. I am getting error mainly with the Interco dimension. For some reason, when I tried to process this dimension, it kept waiting for server response indefinitely. I see this problem only with this dimension. In this context, I have the following questions:
    1. Can the starter kit be used with custom data?
    2. If so, is there any better way to overcome these issues?
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    Ven

    Hi,
    The kit can be definitely be used with customer data. The functionality doesnt depend on what data you have. Rather, it depends on how the configuration has been done. There is definitely something wrong in the IntCo dimension, because of which it might be getting stuck. I believe its just getting stuck. Can you try to maintain only few members in the dimension and then try again? Are you able to process all the other dimensions?

Maybe you are looking for