IIS GROUP POLICY APPLY IN DOMAIN USER

IS IIS RUN DOMAIN USER

Please provide more details on this.
Kindly elaborate.
Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

Similar Messages

  • How to restrict users working on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2

    Dear All,
    We are having an infrastructure setup of around 500 client computers managed through group policy.
    Recently the domain controllers have been migrated from Windows Server 2003 to Server 2008 R2.
    Since this account requires extremely strict environment, we need to figure the solution for restricting the users from access anything locally.
    It would be great if you can assist me with the following query.
    How to restrict users logged on Windows 7 clients from accessing Windows Explorer and browsing other systems in the network through Group Policy with a domain controller running on Windows Server 2008 r2 ?
    Can we disable Network Tab on the left hand pane ?
    explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the Start Menu.

    >   * explorer.exe is blocked already, but users are able to enter the
    >     Windows Explorer by clicking on the name which is visible on the
    >     Start Menu.
    You cannot block explorer.exe when you do not replace the shell - the
    desktop you see effectively IS explorer.exe...
    Your requirement sounds like you need a custom shell:
    http://gpsearch.azurewebsites.net/#2812
    Martin
    Mal ein
    GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
    NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
    Good or bad GPOs?
    And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

  • Does the Computers container in Active Directory have any Group Policy applied to it?

    Hello,
    It is my understanding that the Computers container can not have Group Policy applied to it. Does it still inherit the default domain policy, or is it not affected by any Group Policy at all?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Glad the issue was solved.
    Additionally, for the information about group policy related, please refer to the similar thread as below:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/zh-CN/2122fe4b-c9b4-47ab-b3b9-f114309c7b83/why-cant-i-assign-group-policy-to-computers-container?forum=winserverGP
    Regards.
    Vivian Wang

  • How can I apply group policy but exception some users like administrator?

    Hello all.
    How can I set a group policy and apply it to users exception the administrator ?
    Cheers.

    Hello,
    please see
    http://www.grouppolicy.biz/2015/03/how-to-stop-local-administrators-from-bypassing-group-policy/if you talk about local administrator accounts. In shortyou CAN'T.
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • Enable Inheritance Security Setting wont stay applied on Domain User Accounts

    The Weirdest thing is happening on a 2012 R2 DC, in order to fix the ActiveSync error event ID 1053 on exchange
    2010, the fix is to Enable inheritance on the Advanced Security settings of the domain users that will be using ActiveSync...Ok...but here is the weird thing...I set the Enable inheritance on the users and apply them, then when I check back after however
    long...the setting has now reverted back to disabled inheritance? this is happening on all user accounts?
    This screen shot is from this morning...Last night I changed this setting and enabled inheritance...this morning it reverted back to disabled inheritance?

    Hi John,
    Are you sure it's for quite literally all users, or all users in protected groups like the Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins and so on?
    My guess - and it's only that at this stage, is that you're seeing this affecting protected groups and their members, in which case this is an expected behaviour based on how the AdminSDHolder functionality works.
    You can read more about AdminSDHolder mechanics
    here and
    here.
    Cheers,
    Lain

  • User group policy turns "display last user" to "ON"

    Hello to all,
    I distribute a simple local user group policy to turn off the "Action Center" at the System tray.
    Every time I do this, the "last...

    Search policy includes groups.
    User is only in one group.
    Still the same problem.
    The tree is very simple, one O and one OU. All policies and users are in
    the OU.
    Ian
    "Ian Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:hn_Tc.3065$[email protected]..
    > Hi Craig,
    >
    > I will check that out. It may be the multiple group membership that is
    > causing the problem....
    >
    > "Craig Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]..
    > > 1) Check to make sure you have a search policy defined and that search
    > policy
    > > includes groups.
    > >
    > > 2) Make sure that ONE and only ONE group a user is assigned to has a
    > policy
    > > assigned. Multiple Group Memberships that contain policies will result
    in
    > > seemingly random results. Due to the complex nature of events when
    users
    > belong
    > > to multiple groups that contain policies, Novell actually recommends
    > against the
    > > use of policies for groups. It can be done, but just be sure the limit
    is
    > > maintained.
    > >
    > > Ian Russell wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > > I have ZfD3.2 (SP3) on a NW 6.0 (SP5) server. The user group policy
    does
    > not
    > > > get applied to members of a NetWare group. If I apply it to a user
    > object it
    > > > works.
    > > > Any ideas?
    > > > Ian
    > >
    > > --
    > > Craig Wilson
    > > CNE3, 4, 5 - MCSE - CCNA
    > > NSC Sysop (http://support.novell.com/forums/)
    > >
    > > Tech Writer - http://www.ithowto.com
    > > (I Peter 4:10)
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

  • Outlook 2013 - wrap text group policy applied, not working with or without digital signature

    Hello,
    I'm adding group policies to apply on our new installations of Windows 8.1 with Office 2013. One of the settings being applied is enforcing plain text emails and wrapping text at a certain number of characters. Policies are being added using the Outlook
    2013 admx.
    When I check the options inside Outlook 2013 the group policy did apply successfully (File, Options, Mail, scroll down to Message Format) The option to "Automatically wrap text at character:" is set to 132 and not adjustable as it should be.
    In the group policy I have it set to wrap at 132 characters, but when I go to a client machine and send a digitally signed email, it wraps at the default 76 characters. This makes for very annoying short blocky emails and multi-line hyperlinks.
    If I do not digitally sign the email then the text doesn't wrap at all! (until it meets the end of the window). So under no circumstances is it wrapping at 132 where it's supposed to.
    Thanks,
    -Nick 

    Hi,
    What is your account type in Outlook? Exchange or others?
    Please also let me know the email format that you are sending, Plain Text, HTML or Rich Text Format.
    You can try sending the same emails in Outlook Safe Mode:
    Press Win + R and type “outlook.exe /safe” in the blank box, then press Enter.
    If there’s no problem in Safe Mode, disable the suspicious add-ins to verify which add-ins caused this issue.
    Thanks,
    Melon Chen
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • Any applicable\recommended Group Policy settings (Local & Domain) for configuring windows 8.1 "gold master image" for collection

    Happy Friday everybody -
    I'm working on implementing Microsoft RDS 2012\VDI for the folks here at work.  I've read - online - a lot of articles on VDI and RDS 2012 - and have a working model that is working somewhat satisfactorily.  I haven't seen much online about steps
    I could take in Local Group Policy on my Windows 8.1 'gold image' - or for that matter Domain level group policy - that can assist in creating a better, more reliable/robust Windows 2012 VDI environment.
    Anybody out there got any information or opinions or advice on Group Policy settings for VDI environments?
    Thanks again, everyone!
    Adrian
    anr

    Hi Adrian,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    In regards to your issue you can refer beneath article for detail information.
    1. Group Policy Best Practices for VDI Environments
    2.Some Basic Group Policy Settings for VDI
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki

  • Group Policy for Remote Desktop Users

    Hi,
    Currently my users use desktops and have user and computer GPOs applied (typical things like logon scripts etc.) at the OU level where they reside e.g. Finance Users, Sales Users etc.
    I am planning a Remote Desktop 2012 environment.
    I have read the following:
    TechNet cc779327
    So, my understanding is that I create a new OU for my Remote Desktop Server only (not users), and create a new security Group for my RD Users and a security group for my RD server.
    Remote Desktop Servers OU
               * RD User GPO (filter on RD User security Group and RD Computer Security Group)
               * RD Computer GPO (filter on RD User security Group and RD Computer Security Group)
    I then apply all computer settings to the RD Computer GPO (loopback processing, Windows installer, hide shortcuts etc.).
    I then apply all user settings to the RD User GPO (app specific, templates etc.)
    Why not consolidate the two GPOs into one?
    If I set computer settings in the computer GPO, and apply it as above to filter to the RD Server group and RD Users Group will this apply to only users un the RD User Group...or ALL users since I added the server to the filter?
    If a user currently gets a setting in their normal OU e.g. Finance logon script, will they still get it on the Remote Desktop? Or do I need to copy that GPO setting to my new RD User GPO also?
    Am I right to add both RD Server and RD User groups to the filter on both RD User and RD Computer GPOs?
    Loopback processing - merge or replace typically for Remote Desktop?

    Hi,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    Create OU for RDS Server in Active Directory. Create security group for users who will use Remote Desktop Host (i.e. RDS Users). Create GPO (i.e. RDS Server Lock Down). In Security Filtering delete Authenticated Users, add RDS Server Account, and the security
    group created in previous step.
    Please check beneath article might useful for better understanding.
    Lock Down Remote Desktop Services Server 2012
    How to secure your remote desktop server with GPO
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks,
    Dharmesh

  • Windows 8.1 Group Policy to Force Domain Logon as Default?

    I recently purchased a new Windows 8.1 computer for use in our organization.  The default logon option for the device is for a Microsoft Account (the default username field prompt is for an e-mail address, rather than for a username.)  However,
    I would prefer that the default logon option be for a Windows domain account logon, so that users don't have to click the "Sign-in options" link and select "Local or domain account password" each time they need to log onto the computer.
    I have learned that setting the "Interactive logon:  Do not display last user name"
    policy (located under Computer Configuration / Policies / Windows Settings / Security Settings / Local Policies / Security Options) to
    Disabled allows the domain logon option to be retained across sessions.  However, I would prefer to keep this option set to Enabled so that the previous user name is not displayed.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on how the default logon option can be forced to a domain logon, while still suppressing the display of the last username?

    Hi Arowitv,
    According to your description, we can use the following policy to check the result.
    Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\Security Options:
    Accounts: Block Microsoft accounts
    Click this option, and select" Users can't add or log on with Microsoft account"
    Note: Selecting this option might make it impossible for an existing administrator on this computer to log on and manage the system.
    Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\System\Logon :Assign default domain for logon
    Set the option to Enabled, and add the Default Logon domain.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Kelvin Xu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Adding group policy to non domain computers

    is it possible to add gpo's to computers that are not in the domain..we have some "client" computer that only our customers use and we want to have more security to those computers..what is the best way to accomplish this

    > have more security to those computers..what is the best way to
    > accomplish this
    Download security compliance manager, it has the option to create a
    "local GPO" package that will be installed through a script:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc677002.aspx
    Martin
    Mal ein
    GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
    NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
    Good or bad GPOs?
    And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

  • How to add domain users in RDP in Windows 2012R2

    I just setup Windows 2012 R2 standard server, need to setup domain users to access server via RDP.
    I have read many articles about it, and created a group policy, also add domain users group and individual domain user in Remote Desktop Users. Each user has local workstation administrator privileges.
    When log in to windows 7 pro, domain users still got error as the screenshot below. (administrator can RDP to server). Any one has an idea?

    On DC server:
    Run gpedit.msc
    Browse to Computer Configuration -> Windows settings -> Security Settings -> Local policies -> User Rights Assignment
    Edit "Allow log on through terminal services"
    Add domain users/groups
    Run gpupdate /force

  • How to apply Software Restriction policy for specific user in local group policy object ?

    I am working on implementing user based software restriction policy programmatically for local group policy object.
    If i create a policy through Domain Controller,i do have option for software restriction policy in user configuration but in local group policy editor i don't have option for that.
    When i look for the changes made by policy applied from Domain Controller in registry, they modifies registry values for specific users on path HKEY_USERS\(SID of User)\Softwares\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\Codeidentifiers
    They also have registry.pol stored in SYSvol folder in Domain Controller. When i make the same changes in registry to block any other application, application is getting blocked.
    I achieved what i wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?  
    PS:- I am using Igrouppolicyobject API

    I achieved what I wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
    You also can modify a registry programmatically based policy. Check this:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsadsi/archive/2009/07/23/working-with-group-policy-objects-programmatically-simple-c-example-illustrating-how-to-modify-a-registry-based-policy.aspx
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • User Group Policy Settings not applied to new user profiles at first logon

    Good Afternoon,
    We have an issue that occurs to a new user when they first log on to their machines. They log on and a new profile creates from the Default User Profile. We can see that a number of our Group Policy Settings applied as "User Configuration" are
    not applying.A log off and back on is required before the policies apply.
    Any thoughts to this behaviour please?
    Regards
    LeeB
    Lee Bowman MCITP MCTS

    Hi,
    How about your problem now? How many system encounter this problem? Is all policy couldn't be applied? Is there any feedback when using gpresult to check policy applied status?
    As Group Policy applies after user identity authentication, generally speaking, user logoff and back doesn't helpful with this problem.
    When this problem occures, have you checked event log if it identify this problem?
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Best Practice: Deploying Group Policy to Users on different OUs

    Greetings, everyone! I am needing some advice on how to deploy some group policy objects to specific users stored on different OUs.
    Let me set the stage: I work for a large school district, and have recently taken over the district's career center. The idea behind the career center is that students from different high schools around the city come in to take classes based on their choice
    of career, such as radio broadcasting or auto mechanic and such. The AD structure is set up so that each school has their own OU.  When a user (staff, student, etc.) is assigned to a school OU, they automatically are added to
    their school's security group (i.e. EASTHIGH-STUDENT), and that when any user moves from one school to another, we have to move their AD account to that school's OU, which will remove the security group from the old school and apply the new school
    security group.
    For the career center, since we have students coming from different buildings every day, rather than trying to find a way to move their AD account from their high school OU to the career center OU, the previous techs created generic accounts (such as tv001,
    tv002, etc.) in AD and stored them in the career center OU.  This way, teachers can assign students that particular generic account so that they can access the drives and printers from the career center, as well as access the career center network
    drives while they are at their home high school.
    Since I have moved to the career center, and apparently I have more knowledge about group policy than most of the techs in the district, the district system engineers want me to remove all of the generic accounts from the career center OU, and have students
    use their own AD accounts.  Obviously I also want to do this since the generic accounts are very confusing to me, but I'm trying to figure out the best way to do this.
    For simplicity sake, I'm just going to start off by figuring out how to set up a group policy for mapping the career center drives.  Now, I obviously know that the best way would be to create security groups for each career area, and that we would need
    to add students to those groups so that only those particular students would get the GPO for the career center, but my question is where would I like the group policies to?  Do I need to link it at the root of the domain so that every OU is hit? 
    Just curious about this.
    Thanks!

    Don't link it to the root.... apply the drive mapping as a policy at the OU or you could apply the drive mapping using Group Policy Preferences using security group targeting... .I would also strongly recommend you check out my articles
    Best Practice: Active Directory Structure Guidelines
    – Part 1
    Best Practice: Group Policy Design Guidelines – Part 2
    Hope it helps...

Maybe you are looking for

  • ISA : Dateformat depending on Country and language

    Hi there... I have installed ISA for R/3 and setup several shops for different conutries with corresponding languages. When I log on to the different shops I get different date formats like 21-04-2005 and 21.04.2005 etc. Where is this managed ? First

  • Cl_alv_table_create= create_dynamic_table in ALV Grid

    Hallo everybody i have created a dynamic_table with cl_alv_table_create class. Now i want this dynamic_table integration in my ALV Grid. I try this, but without successfull Can anybody help? PROGRAM zliefervolu. * Definition                          

  • Advice: Treo/Verizon/Ical/Isync/ Do we do it?

    Hi everyone, We're currently using one paper calendar and a pencil. Without legnthy explanations... We want to do the following, and we want to know if it's possible. As the answers we get elsewhere are rather unconvincing. 1. Treo/Blackberry like de

  • RU5 Problem again

    Hi, the script has help first, but after one day I see the same problem with the DPM Management Console again.

  • Silly Font Issue

    I noticed that after a recent upgrade my password characters were huge. It happens in all the GTK2 applications. Any way to make these dots be smaller, as they were before, without changing fonts? Thanks.