Implementing a file server and backup solution

Hi there - Looking for sage advice from the experts! Here's my dilemma:
I have a 1st gen Intel iMac, and I recently picked up the 13-inch aluminum MacBook. Both have 250 Gb drives. I have a fair amount of media and software using all but 9 gigs of space on the iMac. One more Final Cut project should eat the majority of that:-)
Before I start moving media over to the MacBook and run into the same space issues, I'd like to come up with a storage and back up solution that does the following:
1. Provides one centralized location for all media (music, photos, video files)
2. Keep back ups of centralized location AND backups of both iMac and MacBook--I don't want to lose any work in progress.
I'd love to hear how others manage this problem. Can a Time Machine solve the problem? Am I looking at a RAID solution?
Thanks for your help!!

Hi,
In a case where the same workbook is saved locally and on the application server and this error happens, what is the decisive factor? Meaning why does this happen for some workbooks and not for others? Is it a question of size, number of queries, other?
Do embedded excel functionalities and update links also interfere?
Many thanks in advance,
Fabrice.

Similar Messages

  • Definitive Storage and Backup solution

    Hello, I'm looking for a definitive Storage and Backup solution.
    So far I've been looking on to Drobo 5D or N, LaCie 5big Thunderbolt™ 2, or LaCie 2big Thunderbolt™ 2.
    Networking would be a plus but not a must. I'm open for other suggestions and also wonder if these systems can be considered backup since they are ready for single or double disks failures.
    Thanks.

    Methodology to protect your data. Backups vs. Archives. Long-term data protection
    Avoid Lacie, they contain Seagate drives inside.  Bad idea. 
    huge storage, low cost, high quality, very small and portable.
    BEST FOR THE COST, Toshiba "tiny giant" 15mm thick  2TB drive (have several of them, lots of storage in tiny package)    $100
    http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-Canvio-Connect-Portable-HDTC720XK3C1/dp/B00CGUMS48     /ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1390020791&sr=8-3&keywords=toshiba+2tb
    best options for the price, and high quality HD:
    Quality 1TB drives are $50 per TB on 3.5" or  $65 per TB on 2.5"
    Perfect 1TB for $68
    http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-Canvio-Portable-Hard-Drive/dp/B005J7YA3W/ref=sr_1_ 1?ie=UTF8&qid=1379452568&sr=8-1&keywords=1tb+toshiba
    Nice 500gig for $50. ultraslim perfect for use with a notebook
    http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-Canvio-Portable-External-Drive/dp/B009F1CXI2/ref=s     r_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1377642728&sr=1-1&keywords=toshiba+slim+500gb
    *This one is the BEST portable  external HD available that money can buy:
    HGST Touro Mobile 1TB USB 3.0 External Hard Drive $88
    http://www.amazon.com/HGST-Mobile-Portable-External-0S03559/dp/B009GE6JI8/ref=sr     _1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383238934&sr=8-1&keywords=HGST+Touro+Mobile+Pro+1TB+USB+3.0+7 2 00+RPM
    Most storage experts agree on the Hitachi 2.5"
    Hitachi is the winner in hard drive reliability survey:
    Hitachi manufacturers the safest and most reliable hard drives, according to the Storelab study. Of the hundreds of Hitachi hard drives received, not a single one had failed due to manufacturing or design errors. Adding the highest average lifespans and the best relationship between failures and market share, Hitachi can be regarded as the winner.
    Data Storage Platforms; their Drawbacks & Advantages
    #1. Time Machine / Time Capsule
    Drawbacks:
    1. Time Machine is not bootable, if your internal drive fails, you cannot access files or boot from TM directly from the dead computer.
    OS X Lion, Mountain Lion, and Mavericks include OS X Recovery. This feature includes all of the tools you need to reinstall OS X, repair your disk, and even restore from a Time Machine
    "you can't boot directly from your Time Machine backups"
    2. Time machine is controlled by complex software, and while you can delve into the TM backup database for specific file(s) extraction, this is not ideal or desirable.
    3. Time machine can and does have the potential for many error codes in which data corruption can occur and your important backup files may not be saved correctly, at all, or even damaged. This extra link of failure in placing software between your data and its recovery is a point of risk and failure. A HD clone is not subject to these errors.
    4. Time machine mirrors your internal HD, in which cases of data corruption, this corruption can immediately spread to the backup as the two are linked. TM is perpetually connected (or often) to your computer, and corruption spread to corruption, without isolation, which TM lacks (usually), migrating errors or corruption is either automatic or extremely easy to unwittingly do.
    5. Time Machine does not keep endless copies of changed or deleted data, and you are often not notified when it deletes them; likewise you may accidently delete files off your computer and this accident is mirrored on TM.
    6. Restoring from TM is quite time intensive.
    7. TM is a backup and not a data archive, and therefore by definition a low-level security of vital/important data.
    8. TM working premise is a “black box” backup of OS, APPS, settings, and vital data that nearly 100% of users never verify until an emergency hits or their computers internal SSD or HD that is corrupt or dead and this is an extremely bad working premise on vital data.
    9. Given that data created and stored is growing exponentially, the fact that TM operates as a “store-it-all” backup nexus makes TM inherently incapable to easily backup massive amounts of data, nor is doing so a good idea.
    10. TM working premise is a backup of a users system and active working data, and NOT massive amounts of static data, yet most users never take this into consideration, making TM a high-risk locus of data “bloat”.
    11. In the case of Time Capsule, wifi data storage is a less than ideal premise given possible wireless data corruption.
    12. TM like all HD-based data is subject to ferromagnetic and mechanical failure.
    13. *Level-1 security of your vital data.
    Advantages:
    1. TM is very easy to use either in automatic mode or in 1-click backups.
    2. TM is a perfect novice level simplex backup single-layer security save against internal HD failure or corruption.
    3. TM can easily provide a seamless no-gap policy of active data that is often not easily capable in HD clones or HD archives (only if the user is lazy is making data saves).
    #2. HD archives
    Drawbacks:
    1. Like all HD-based data is subject to ferromagnetic and mechanical failure.
    2. Unless the user ritually copies working active data to HD external archives, then there is a time-gap of potential missing data; as such users must be proactive in archiving data that is being worked on or recently saved or created.
    Advantages:
    1. Fills the gap left in a week or 2-week-old HD clone, as an example.
    2. Simplex no-software data storage that is isolated and autonomous from the computer (in most cases).
    3. HD archives are the best idealized storage source for storing huge and multi-terabytes of data.
    4. Best-idealized 1st platform redundancy for data protection.
    5. *Perfect primary tier and level-2 security of your vital data.
    #3. HD clones (see below for full advantages / drawbacks)
    Drawbacks:
    1. HD clones can be incrementally updated to hourly or daily, however this is time consuming and HD clones are, often, a week or more old, in which case data between today and the most fresh HD clone can and would be lost (however this gap is filled by use of HD archives listed above or by a TM backup).
    2. Like all HD-based data is subject to ferromagnetic and mechanical failure.
    Advantages:
    1. HD clones are the best, quickest way to get back to 100% full operation in mere seconds.
    2. Once a HD clone is created, the creation software (Carbon Copy Cloner or SuperDuper) is no longer needed whatsoever, and unlike TM, which requires complex software for its operational transference of data, a HD clone is its own bootable entity.
    3. HD clones are unconnected and isolated from recent corruption.
    4. HD clones allow a “portable copy” of your computer that you can likewise connect to another same Mac and have all your APPS and data at hand, which is extremely useful.
    5. Rather than, as many users do, thinking of a HD clone as a “complimentary backup” to the use of TM, a HD clone is superior to TM both in ease of returning to 100% quickly, and its autonomous nature; while each has its place, TM can and does fill the gap in, say, a 2 week old clone. As an analogy, the HD clone itself is the brick wall of protection, whereas TM can be thought of as the mortar, which will fill any cracks in data on a week, 2-week, or 1-month old HD clone.
    6. Best-idealized 2nd platform redundancy for data protection, and 1st level for system restore of your computers internal HD. (Time machine being 2nd level for system restore of the computer’s internal HD).
    7. *Level-2 security of your vital data.
    HD cloning software options:
    1. SuperDuper HD cloning software APP (free)
    2. Carbon Copy Cloner APP (will copy the recovery partition as well)
    3. Disk utility HD bootable clone.
    #4. Online archives
    Drawbacks:
    1. Subject to server failure or due to non-payment of your hosting account, it can be suspended.
    2. Subject, due to lack of security on your part, to being attacked and hacked/erased.
    Advantages:
    1. In case of house fire, etc. your data is safe.
    2. In travels, and propagating files to friends and likewise, a mere link by email is all that is needed and no large media needs to be sent across the net.
    3. Online archives are the perfect and best-idealized 3rd platform redundancy for data protection.
    4. Supremely useful in data isolation from backups and local archives in being online and offsite for long-distance security in isolation.
    5. *Level-1.5 security of your vital data.
    #5. DVD professional archival media
    Drawbacks:
    1. DVD single-layer disks are limited to 4.7Gigabytes of data.
    2. DVD media are, given rough handling, prone to scratches and light-degradation if not stored correctly.
    Advantages:
    1. Archival DVD professional blank media is rated for in excess of 100+ years.
    2. DVD is not subject to mechanical breakdown.
    3. DVD archival media is not subject to ferromagnetic degradation.
    4. DVD archival media correctly sleeved and stored is currently a supreme storage method of archiving vital data.
    5. DVD media is once written and therefore free of data corruption if the write is correct.
    6. DVD media is the perfect ideal for “freezing” and isolating old copies of data for reference in case newer generations of data become corrupted and an older copy is needed to revert to.
    7. Best-idealized 4th platform redundancy for data protection.
    8. *Level-3 (highest) security of your vital data. 
    [*Level-4 data security under development as once-written metallic plates and synthetic sapphire and likewise ultra-long-term data storage]
    #6. Cloud based storage
    Drawbacks:
    1. Cloud storage can only be quasi-possessed.
    2. No genuine true security and privacy of data.
    3. Should never be considered for vital data storage or especially long-term.
    4. *Level-0 security of your vital data. 
    Advantages:
    1. Quick, easy and cheap storage location for simplex files for transfer to keep on hand and yet off the computer.
    2. Easy source for small-file data sharing.
    #7. Network attached storage (NAS) and JBOD storage
    Drawbacks:
    1. Subject to RAID failure and mass data corruption.
    2. Expensive to set up initially.
    3. Can be slower than USB, especially over WiFi.
    4. Mechanically identical to USB HD backup in failure potential, higher failure however due to RAID and proprietary NAS enclosure failure.
    Advantages:
    1. Multiple computer access.
    2. Always on and available.
    3. Often has extensive media and application server functionality.
    4. Massive capacity (also its drawback) with multi-bay NAS, perfect for full system backups on a larger scale.
    5. *Level-2 security of your vital data.
    JBOD (just a bunch of disks / drives) storage
    Identical to NAS in form factor except drives are not networked or in any RAID array, rather best thought of as a single USB feed to multiple independent drives in a single powered large enclosure. Generally meaning a non-RAID architecture.
    Drawbacks:
    1. Subject to HD failure but not RAID failure and mass data corruption.
    Advantages:
    1. Simplex multi-drive independent setup for mass data storage.
    2. Very inexpensive dual purpose HD storage / access point.
    3. *Level-2 security of your vital data.
    Bare hard drives and docks. The most reliable and cheapest method of hard drive data storage, archives, and redundancies
    The best method for your data archives and redundancies, which is also the least expensive, the most reliable, and the most compact option is the purchase of naked hard drives and at least one USB 3.0 HD dock ($40 roughly).
    While regarding Time Machine and your Macbook or desktop, your primary backup is best saved to a conventional USB (or Firewire / thunderbolt) hard drive inside an enclosure, the most important part of your data protection begins after your 1st / primary Time Machine / backup; and these are your secondary (most important) data storage devices, archives and their redundancies.
    However bare hard drives and docks (below) also work perfectly as a Time Machine backup, this is for home use, since the docking station is certainly not very portable as a notebook Time Machine backup device should be; nor should bare HD be packed around with a notebook, rather remain at home or office.
    Six terabytes of 2.5" HD pictured below in a very compact space.
    Bare hard drives and docks have the lowest cost, the highest reliability, and take up the smallest storage space
    Drawbacks:
    1. Care and knowledge in general handling of naked hard drives (how not to shock a bare HD, and how to hold them properly). Not a genuine drawback.
    Advantages:
    1. By far the least expensive method of mass HD storage on a personal basis. Highest quality naked HD can be purchased in bulk very cheap.
    2. Eliminates the horrible failure point of SATA bridges and interfaces between external drives and the computer.
    3. Per square foot you can store more terabytes of data this way than any other.
    4. Fast, easy, no fuss and most simplex method of data storage on hard drives.
    Time Machine is a system  backup, not a data backup
    Important data you “don’t dare lose” should not be considered ultimately safe, or ideally stored (at the very least not as sole copy of same) on your Time Machine backup. Hourly and daily fluctuations of your system OS, applications, and software updates is the perfect focus for the simple user to conduct ‘click it and forget it’ backups of the entire system and files on the Macbook HD.
    Bootable clones are the choice of professionals and others in that Time Machine cannot be booted from and requires a working HD to retrieve data from (meaning another computer). Your vital data needs to be and should be ‘frozen’ on some form of media storage, either in a clone, as an archived HD containing important files, or on DVD blank archival media.
    A file that is backed up to Time Machine is unsafe in that if that file is deleted off the computer by accident or lost otherwise, that file will likewise vanish from Time Machine as it reflects changes on the internal computer HD/SSD.

  • Iphone contacts "not available" to car phonebook after messing around with Outlook.pst file names and backups. Iphone4 connects to car though and other phones connect properly.

    iphone contacts "not available" to car phonebook after messing around with Outlook.pst files, names and backups, on my ms XP 2003 laptop. I substituted a much smaller new Personal Folder -Contacts File, with a smaller list of phone numbers (4 only as a test) which successfully synced to the iPhone 4. The iPhone connects to the Skoda Octavia HandsFreeSystem OK (Bluetooth works fine), but now iPhone wont load the new Contacts as it did originally. However a family Nokia (never messed with) can connect properly. So must be the iPhone or more likely an Outlook.pst \ Contacts problem. Ideas?

    After fiddling a little more, the following fixed my corrupted outlook.pst file:
    1) I made a backup
    2) In outlook under file, I exported the calendar to excel
    3) In outlook under file, I imported the calendar back to outlook
    And voila, it worked.

  • Replace a 2003 (not R2) File Server with a 2012R2 files server and preferably keep the same machine name and IP when finished

    I am wanting to replace a 2003 (not R2) File Server with a 2012R2 file server and preferably keep the same machine name and IP when finished.  For the moment I just need some "high level" guidance, little details can be worked out once I know
    which direction I will go.  I was considering that DFS might be a way to help get through the process although when finished the 2012R2 Files server will be by itself with no other file server planned at this time.  DFS can stay installed for maybe
    future purposes but clearly I wouldn't need the DFS Replication with only one machine.
    Here's a few details of the environment....
    1.  DC's are 2012R2 but it is still 2003 DFL because the old 2003 DCs are still present.  But likely they will be gone and the DFL elevated before I start on the File Server project
    2. Nearly all machines in the facility have a shortcut on the "All Users" Desktop that points to the existing old File Server.  Editing or replacing that shortcut would be a major pain,...hence why I want to keep the same machine name at least,
    and maybe the same IP if not too much trouble.  This way the existing shortcut would continue to work with the new 2012R2 File Server.  The UNC path represented in that shortcut is also configured into one or more of our major business applications,
    futher emphasizing the need to keep the UNC path the same throughout the process.
    3. The facility runs 24/7/365 but is "light" on weekends.  The political environment is such that there is little to no tolerance for any down time at all.
    4. Would DFS (based from the 2012R2 machine) be a good tool to get where I need to go?
    Thanks for any suggestions.
    Phillip Windell

    Hi Sharon,
    I've done some more reading and have a few new ideas to run past you....
    Yes regular DFS wouldn't help and the Namespace would still be different than how it was with just the old server. However I was thinking DFS Replication could replace the purpose of RoboCopy and it would keep the two locations "in sync" until I was ready
    to flip over to the new server.  DFS Rep can exist independently of a DFS Namespace, so a Namespace is not even needed. It needs a minimum of 2003R2 for the "later & better" DFS Rep but I believe 2003 can do an "in place" upgrade to 2003R2, so I would upgrade
    the old server to 2003R2 first.  As long as the DFS Rep on 2012R2 and 2003R2 will properly interact I think that will work.
    Thanks for the reg info on the Shares.  I'm debating if editing that would reg file would really be much better than manually creating the Shares on the new server while the DFS Replication was doing its job.  I'll probably export that Key as a
    safety move whether I use it or not.
    Once the DFS Rep is fully in sync and the Shares are in place on the new server, I figure I would then:
    1. Remove the DFS Replication Object (optionally remove DFS Services completely)
    2. Rename the old File Server to something else and set it to DHCP
    3. Rename the new File Server to the name I want to use and give it the IP the old server had.
    How does that sound?
    Phillip Windell

  • Easy Server 2012 backup solutions with tape support?

    We have several smaller to midsized customers that have invested money in tape drives and tapes. They are using Symantec BackupExec on Server 2003 / 2008 and 2008 R2. Unfortunately, Symantec postponed Server 2012 support in their products  many times
    already. This fact costs us many business opportunities to upgrade infrastructures to Server 2012.
    DPM 2012 is good for larger customers, but less suited for smaller companies (and the DPM "philosophy change" of the backup procedures, compared to older tape based backup solutions is an obstacle as well.)
    So we are looking for EASY backup solutions that support tape drives and server 2012. The "perfect" product for us would be just a tape driver and an extension to the integrated Windows Server Backup that would allow to store backups on tapes,
    the same way that Windows Backup allows backups to network shared folders.
    Does anyone knows EASY backup software that provides this functionality? I'm also very interested in feedback from peoples that have successfully used such products on Server 2012 and are satisfied with them.
    Thank you all in advance for any help.
    Franz

    Looks like we are in the same boat here with 2012.
    For all its trouble, BackupExec has been instrumental for us in providing our customers with a backup application that no other software vendor has been able to match. This includes:
    1) Granular backup and restore of Exchange allowing the restore of individual mailboxes and single mail items
    2) The same Granular backup and restore of Hyper-V's VMs
    3) The ability to backup to Tape, Removable USB HDD and NAS and Network shares
    Not even Shadow Protect cuts the mustard anymore – it’s become simply “stupid”.
    Although we love the simplicity and robustness of Windows Backup, there are some very serious deficiencies including;
    1) The extreme difficulty of adding additional USB HDD after the backup schedule has been created. I believe that this has partially been resolved in R2 but in 2012 it was a utter mess-up. We
    resorted to hooking up two 5-port USB Powered Hubs so we could make sure that all USB HDDs could be included in the schedule - what a mission! One blown hub after the other - couldn't find one that could handle the electrical current load of 5x USB HDDs!
    2) No Granular restore ability of nothing... had to resort back to the "old school" ESEUTIL "after" restoring the entire Exchange database to alternate location.
    3) Backup to a Network Share is pathetic - can't store more than the current backup. What use is that? Had to resort to backing up to Network Share then including that backup in another Windows backup - go figure!
    Like Franz, our customers have invested HEAVILY in Tape Drive hardware (some of which cost the customer in excess of $8000) and that excludes the cost of Symantec BackupExec.
    Although BackupExec 2012 now supports Server 2012, the re-purchase of the software is not a consideration to most of our customers.
    Sorry Franz, I don’t have a solution for Tape Drives yet. This is one reason why we have stayed away from deploying 2012 that already have a recent investment in Tape Drive technology.
    However, because there is NO other backup solution that compares to Symantec BackupExec (version <2010), we have been successfully implementing a hybrid solution (which, unfortunately, still does not include Tape Drives) including our own business.
    As BackupExec 2010 does not support Windows 2012 as a “Media Server” there IS a workaround in a “virtual environment”.
    We have successfully installed BackupExec 2010 on a Hyper-V Virtual Server as the “media server” and targeted the backups to shared folders on both NAS and removable USB HDD shares (off the Host Server).
    Although it works GREAT, there is still the serious deficiency of not been able to use Tape Drives (unless some really bright spark out there has an idea on how to make a Tape Drive accessible to a VM).
    Another REALLY good solution in which we deployed just last week was to supply the customer with a dirt-cheap PC, install it with Windows 2008 and the Tape Drive and schedule all the normal (and yummy) BackupExec 2010 granular backups to. Remember, the BackupExec
    agent WILL install and run just fine on Server 2012 - no problems there.
    This has become an INSTANT hit and this is OUR solution – a very small price to pay for “real granular” backups to Tape Drive.
    I hope that you find that the mentioned "good solution" a viable and cost-effective workaround.
    Backup Exec DOES NOT support Windows 2012.  I just got of the phone with them today April 24, 2014.  I have been using BE since Seagate made version 7.  Every product Symantec buys eventually turns to crap!  I just left Symantec Endpoint
    Protection after 13 years because it is unreliable and has very poor detection compared to other products.  In fact, it is so bad, that Symantec won't participate in any third-party evaluations that they don't pay for such as AV-Comparatives.org. 
    Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Symantec!

  • Various network setups for media serving and backups

    Are there any good sites, blog posts, etc that show different home network configurations with a Time Capsule, external HDs and Macs for handling backups and media serving? Right now I have a simple Setup where my TC backs up my MBP. I also have a couple externals HDs w a lot of music and video that's not in my iTunes library on the MBP, the HD of which is at capacity. I know I want to be able to easily access all of that content on my MBP, AppleTV, iPhone, iPad. I also want to have a good backup solution (possibly even a backup of the backup for redundancy). I just don't know the simplest way to do it and haven't found a good resource to see the alternatives and/or pros/cons of different configurations. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

    This is as I posted a Self help forum the only BT presence are the forum moderators your very likely to get help from other forum users it is just a matter of waiting until some one with gaming knowledge reads your post
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • File Server and Port 21

    Hi Guys and Girls
    Just a quick question here. To be able to use the File Server functionality do I have to open up port 21 in the main router? I was previously looking at NAS devices which require port 21 to be opened but my Dad wasn't too keen on opening the port on his router.  I've watched a few setup videos and they don't mention anything about port 21. I just want to double check before I spend $400+.
    Any input would be greatly appreciated

    LaPastenague wrote:
    I have previously looked into these NAS MyCloud options. They all require ports to be opened up with in the main router
    Pros
    • Freshened interface
    • USB 3.0 for expanded storage
    • Easy remote access without port forwarding
    • 3 licenses for Smartware Pro backup software
    • Apple Time Machine backup
    • NAS snapshot backups
    Not according to smallnetbuilder.
    Says explicitly without port forwarding..
    Hmmm Interesting...
    You do need upnp of course.. but upnp is available on all routers nowadays.. (except apple ones of course).
    Does this involve messing with the router in anyway?
    If you are accessing it 90% of the time from LAN.. then you need faster access than TC USB drive. And really faster access than WD MyCloud then you need a real NAS.
    I have actually just shared my 2TB WD USB 2.0 drive on my network and connected my Windows Laptop to it via IP and the speeds are 100% fine. Absolutely no lag. It's running like a native drive.

  • High availability for file server and exchange with 2 physical servers

    Dear Experts,
    I have 2 physical server with local disks only. I want to setup below on same with high availability, please advise best prossible options. We will be using windows 2012 R2 Server..
    1. Domain controller
    2. Exchange 2013
    As of now I am thinking of setting up below:
    1. Install Hyper-v on both and create 3 VM on each as
    -On Host A- 1 VM for DC, 1 VM for File server with DFS namespace and replication for file server HA and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 with CAS/MBX with DAG and DNS RR for Exchange HA
    -On Host B - 1 VM for ADC, 1 VM for File server DFS member for above and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 CAS/MBX with DAG member
    I have read on internet about new features called scale out file server (SoFS) in Windows 2012 Server but not sure that will be preferred for file sharing.
    Any advise will be highly appreciated..
    Thanks for the help in advance..
    Best regards,

    Dear Experts,
    I have 2 physical server with local disks only. I want to setup below on same with high availability, please advise best prossible options. We will be using windows 2012 R2 Server..
    1. Domain controller
    2. Exchange 2013
    As of now I am thinking of setting up below:
    1. Install Hyper-v on both and create 3 VM on each as
    -On Host A- 1 VM for DC, 1 VM for File server with DFS namespace and replication for file server HA and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 with CAS/MBX with DAG and DNS RR for Exchange HA
    -On Host B - 1 VM for ADC, 1 VM for File server DFS member for above and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 CAS/MBX with DAG member
    I have read on internet about new features called scale out file server (SoFS) in Windows 2012 Server but not sure that will be preferred for file sharing.
    Any advise will be highly appreciated..
    Thanks for the help in advance..
    Best regards,
    DFS is by far the best way to implement any sort of file server. Because a) failover is not fully transparent and does not happen always (say not on copy ) b) DFS cannot replicate open files so if you edit a big file and have node rebooted you're going to
    lose ALL transactions/updates you've applied c) actually slows down the config. See:
    DFS for failover
    http://help.globalscape.com/help/wafs3/using_microsoft_dfs_for_failover.htm
    DFS FAQ
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc773238(WS.10).aspx
    (check "open files" point here)
    DFS Performance
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/08/22/windows-server-dfs-namespaces-performance-and-scalability.aspx
    SoFS a) requires shared storage to run and you don't have one b) does not support generic workloads
    (only Hyper-V and SQL Server) and c) technically makes sense to expand SAS JBOD or existing FC SAN to numerous Hyper-V clients over 10 GbE w/o need to invest money into SAS switches and HBAs and FC HBAs and new licenses FC ports. Making long story short:
    SoFS is NOT YOUR CASE. 
    SoFS Overview
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831349.aspx
    http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12786
    http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12786
    For now you need to find some shared storage to be a back end for your hypevisor config (SAS JBOD from supported list, virtual SAN from multiple vendors like for example StarWind see below, make sure you review ALL the vendors) and then you create a failover
    SMB 3.0 share for your file server workload. See:
    Clustered Storage Spaces over SAS JBOD
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822937.aspx
    Virtual SAN from inexpensive SATA and no SAS or FC
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/native-san-for-hyper-v-free-edition
    Failover
    SMB File Server in Windows Server 2012 R2
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/configuring-ha-file-server-on-windows-server-2012-for-smb-nas
    Fault
    tolerant file server on just a pair of nodes
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/ns-configuring-ha-file-server-for-smb-nas
    For Exchange you use SMB share from above for a file share witness and use DAG. See:
    Exchange DAG
    Good luck! Hope this helped :)
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • 2 Hyper-V Servers with Failover Cluster and a single File Server and .VHDs stored on a SMB 3 Share

    I have 2 X M600 Dell Blades (100 GB local storage and 2 NICs)  and a Single R720 File Server (2.5 TB local SAS storage and 6 NICs).  I´m planning a Lab/developer enrironment using 2 Hyper-V Servers with Failover Cluster and a single File Server putting
    all  .VHDs stored on a SMB 3 Share on the File Server.
    The ideia is to have a HA solution, live migration, etc, storing the .VHDs onm a SMB 3 share
    \\fileserver\shareforVHDs
    It is possible? How Cluster will understand the
    \\fileserver\shareforVHDs as a cluster disk and offer HA on it?
    Or i´ll have to "re-think" and forget about VHDs on SMb 3 Share and deploy using iSCSI?
    Storage Spaces makes difference in this case?
    All based on wind2012 R2 STD English version

    I have 2 X M600 Dell Blades (100 GB local storage and 2 NICs)  and a Single R720 File Server (2.5 TB local SAS storage and 6 NICs).  I´m planning a Lab/developer enrironment using 2 Hyper-V Servers with Failover Cluster and a single File Server putting
    all  .VHDs stored on a SMB 3 Share on the File Server.
    The ideia is to have a HA solution, live migration, etc, storing the .VHDs onm a SMB 3 share
    \\fileserver\shareforVHDs
    It is possible? How Cluster will understand the
    \\fileserver\shareforVHDs as a cluster disk and offer HA on it?
    Or i´ll have to "re-think" and forget about VHDs on SMb 3 Share and deploy using iSCSI?
    Storage Spaces makes difference in this case?
    All based on wind2012 R2 STD English version
    You can do what you want to do just fine. Hyper-V / Windows Server 2012 R2 can use SMB 3.0 share instead of a block storage (iSCSI/FC/etc). See:
    Deploy Hyper-V over SMB
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134187.aspx
    There would be no shared disk and no CSV just SMB 3.0 folder both hypervisor hosts would have access to. Much simplier to use. See:
    Hyper-V recommends SMB or CSV ?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d6e06d59-bef3-42ba-82f1-5043713b5552/hyperv-recommends-smb-or-csv-
    You'll have however a limited solution as your single physical server being a file server would be a single point of failure.
    You can use Storage Spaces just fine but you cannot use Clustered Storage Spaces as in this case you'll have to take away your SAS spindles from your R720 box and mount them into SAS JBOD (make sure it's certified). So you get rid of an active components
    (CPU, RAM) and keep more robust all-passive SAS JBOD as your physical shared storage. Better then a single Windows-running server but for a true fault tolerance you'll have to have 3 SAS JBODs. Not exactly cheap :) See:
    Deploy Clustered Storage Spaces
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822937.aspx
    Storage Spaces,
    JBODs, and Failover Clustering – A Recipe for Cost-Effective, Highly Available Storage
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/storageserver/archive/2013/10/19/storage-spaces-jbods-and-failover-clustering-a-recipe-for-cost-effective-highly-available-storage.aspx
    Using
    Storage Spaces for Storage Subsystem Performance
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn567634.aspx#enclosure
    Storage
    Spaces FAQ
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/11382.storage-spaces-frequently-asked-questions-faq.aspx
    Alternative way would be using Virtual SAN similar to VMware VSAN in this case you can get rid of a physical shared storage @ all and use cheap high capacity SATA spindles (and SATA SSDs!) instead of an expensive SAS.
    Hope this helped :)
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • File Server and Permissions

    We are using Coldfusion 8.  Does anyone know a way to set permissions on a file server so my users in my cfapplication are the only people that can access the files in a specific folder on that server?  I ask this because we have a lot of public folders on this server and now we want to add some private folders only accesable via people using the application.

    If what you are asking is "how can I setup a folder on my fileserver so that files that are accessed through my CF application using tags such as CFFILE are the only ones that can access it" then the answer is to 1) Change the login information for the CF services from the local system service to a domain account, being sure to give that account admin privs, 2) on the file server only give access to the domain user that you just created in step 1.
    However, if your CF app is allowing users to access that folder via mechanisms like HREF links (ie, where the account accessing the folder is not the CF account, but the user that is logged into windows running a browser), then you need to put those users in a group and give that group the sole access to the folder.
    Scenario #1 presumes that your CF app is doing some sort of authentication so that it knows who is allowed to use it to get to that folder. 
    -reed

  • I need a travel router and backup solution... Time Capsule?

    I stay in hotels 365 days a year and traveling with the lightest and smallest equipment is important. I have a recent MBP and an iPhone I operate wirelessly each night. I currently have an external 2TB hard drive I use for firewire based backups now. I also have an Asus wl330ge mini travel router (basically a smaller and cheaper alternative to the Airport Express).
    Basically, I want to end up with a wireless backup solution, (a wireless NAS) and I'd love it to have the wireless sharing/router/ethernet bridging abilities built in as well. I'm hoping this device is the Time Capsule. Please help me answer these questions:
    -In hotel rooms where they provide a wired ETHERNET connection the Time Capsule will need to act as a wireless BRIDGE via ethernet + time machine. This is possible, correct?
    -In hotel rooms where the hotel provides ONLY wifi, the device will need to ask as a wireless CLIENT and connect to the hotels WIFI network, is this possible?
    Thanks for your assistance!

    Welcome to the discussion area, GetFoxy!
    In hotel rooms where they provide a wired ETHERNET connection the Time Capsule will need to act as a wireless BRIDGE via ethernet + time machine. This is possible, correct?
    Yes. If you configure the Time Capsule in Bridge Mode, you can setup the Time Capsule to "create a wireless network" and connect multiple wireless and ethernet devices. The big question is IF the hotel allows multiple devices to connect from one room. Some hotel routers do, some don't.
    If multiple devices are not allowed to connect, you can try changing the Connection Sharing on the Time Capsule to "Share a public IP address". This will create what is known as a Double NAT error...usually not too serious in this type of setup...and it may allow you to connect multiple devices to the Time Capsule since the hotel' router only "sees" one device...the Time Capsule in this type of configuration. Sometimes works when Bridge Mode will not do what you want, but some hotel systems will not allow another router to connect to their network.
    In hotel rooms where the hotel provides ONLY wifi, the device will need to ask as a wireless CLIENT and connect to the hotels WIFI network, is this possible?
    Yes. But, when the Time Capsule "joins" a wireless network and becomes a client, it performs no routing functions in this type of configuration. In other words, the ethernet ports on the Time Capsule are not enabled, and the Time Capsule cannot provide a wireless network configured this way, so all device connections would occur over the hotel wireless.
    Whether or not you would be able to connect multiple devices to the wireless network is open to question as many hotels only allow one wireless connection at a time per room. Or, if multiple devices are allowed to connect per room, the hotel will likely charge you separately for each device/connection.
    Bottom line...this is going to be an "iffy" proposition because you often will not know what will work and what won't until you actually get to the hotel. You'll have much better luck with hotels that provide ethernet connections.
    Since you'll need to make configuration changes on the Time Capsule to adapt to different hotel networks, you'll need to have AirPort Utility, the software application used to setup the Time Capsule, on your computer.
    Finally, as far as space is concerned, you would probably need to re-pack the Time Capsule in the original carton to protect the hard drive from damage during travel. Or, come up with a good way to protect it for travel.
    Message was edited by: Bob Timmons

  • Set up a media server and backup

    I hope I picked the best community for maximum exposure to this set of questions:
    I want to build a video distribution system.  I have teh ability to send audio throughout the house and HD video via 2 CAT 6 in every room.  From my research and being an Apple fan this is what I am thinking about doing.  I am considering not using the CAT 6 for video and using wired or wireless connections at one of several locations to get video and other media.
    Here is what I have:  Airport Express (extender mode), Aiport Extreme, Netgear Gigabit switch feeding the wired locations.  I have some older WD MyBooks connected via the network and a USB 500GB drive connected to the Airport Extreme for Time Machine backups - of just my MBP, not my wife's MBP. 
    1.  Should I buy a Mac Mini to act as the media server for the house?  I suspect I could have 4-5 locations at once demanding media via Apple TV or xBox 360 (via connect 360).  I would like to not buy more than 1 Mac mini.  I have considered stuff by Request Media and they are really expensive compared to the cost of one or even two mac minis.  
    2.  I want to have all of the media stored on a RAID 1 network attached drive (or Firewire, Thunderbolt, USB 3.0 whatever).  I also want to be able to backup the computers in the house to this storage too.  Possible?  Lacie seems to have a good product, but, pricey.
    3.  I suppose I could put a large hard drive in the Mac Mini and store all the media there and use the RAID 1 system to back up all computers somehow.  It seems Time Machine freaks out when more than one computer backs up to the same drive.   Is there a better way than Time Machine?
    In essence I want to put together a system that supports media distribution via multiple streams via wired or wireless network connections to 3-4 locations simultaneously, backup everything, and store everything video and audio and I am looking for recommendations. 
    Thanks many!

    tonydutt wrote:
    1.  Should I buy a Mac Mini to act as the media server for the house?  I suspect I could have 4-5 locations at once demanding media via Apple TV or xBox 360 (via connect 360).  I would like to not buy more than 1 Mac mini.  I have considered stuff by Request Media and they are really expensive compared to the cost of one or even two mac minis.  
    As previously stated, iTunes libraries cannot be accessed
    simultaneously by to different computers.  This would pretty
    much rule out having an Apple TV and other Mac(s) using
    the same iTunes library at the same time.  Unfortunately,
    Apple TV needs iTunes for any local network streaming.
    However, ther are other ATV type devices out there that can
    access files directly on any network storage.
    There are also other media apps (PLEX, XBMC,etc.) that
    can simply be set up to link to network storage systems.
    Personally, I am using XBMC on my Macs and all are
    linked to media files that are located on HDD attached to
    my Airport Extreme Base Station.
    2.  I want to have all of the media stored on a RAID 1 network attached drive (or Firewire, Thunderbolt, USB 3.0 whatever).  I also want to be able to backup the computers in the house to this storage too.  Possible?  Lacie seems to have a good product, but, pricey.
    There are various options here.  Something to consider, is
    LaCie's Thunderbolt to SATA adapter:
    http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?id=10574.
    You could then get one of OWC's RAID enclosures w/ SATA
    interface and roll your own storage.  Advantages of this approach
    1.  The RAIDs will be hardware RAID.
    2.  You could have two independed RAID systems attached
          for various reasons or puposes.
    3.  Higher speed disk interface vs. USB3.
    4.  You can also install highest speed HDD's available if
          desired.
    5.  If a a single disk drive goes belly-up, replacement is fast
          and easy.
    6.  Also, upgrading to larger drives is a matter of just swapping
         the HDD itself.
    3.  I suppose I could put a large hard drive in the Mac Mini and store all the media there and use the RAID 1 system to back up all computers somehow.  It seems Time Machine freaks out when more than one computer backs up to the same drive.   Is there a better way than Time Machine?
    With this sort of system, I would avoid putting data inside
    and libraries inside the Mini.  Should the HDD fail, your whole system
    and data will be down.  I would suggest get a Mini with a single
    SSD drive with OSX and install Server on it.  Being solid state,
    it will in the long run be more reliable than a mechanical HDD.
    Then put all data and libraries on external storage.  If any of
    the data/library drives fail, repair/replacement will be quick
    and simple.
    For your purpose, you don't need to by the "Server" model.
    Just get either the base or next one up and just install the
    server app on it.

  • Network server and backup

    I have a home network with 3 macs and 2 windows computers. I need a solution to alow me to share the media (itunes pictures and movies) from the network to the various computers and to be able to backup the media. Any ideas?
    thanks

    I thought about that but:
    1. how do I back up the NAS?
    2. If I confugure it as RAID 1 I sort of get a back up in case of a drive crash but if a file is deleted or corrupted I'm screwed.

  • The best option for home NAS and backup solution

    Hi,
    There are many partial answers here. I’m wondering if anybody faced and resolved my situation and share recommendation and lessons learned. Or if the topic can be Apple only - is Time capsule solution to my needs?
    What I have?
    I bought my first Apple product recently - the New iPad. I have also desktop PC, 2 laptops and standard 100 Mb WIFI router .
    What I plan to buy?
    New TV, new Apple TV, Active speakers for TV with reasonable sound and NAS/Time capsule solution whatever it will be
    What I want?
    Optimally I'd like to:
    - Have my data (mainly Music/Photos) backuped on NAS/Timecapsule
    - Access to data storage from iPad/Apple TV
    - Fully control music (iTunes), Photos & full HD video from iPad
    - Share iPad screen on TV screen
    - I don’t want to have my PC running all the time
    - I'm not the type of geek guy who loves setting up things and playing with many options. Plug & play, one time set up and one remote control for everything is what I seek
    - Also price does play role - looking for higher mid-end solution
    Any ideas or questions are welcommed.
    Thanks.

    The Time Capsule is definitely not what you want...my opinion. It was specifically designed for Time Machine backups from a Mac and to function as a wireless router.
    Half of the cost of the product is built into the wireless router portion of the product, which it sounds like you would not use.
    While it is possible to store other media on the Time Capsule drive, It is not a media server, so any iTunes media...music, video, etc., will require that iTunes, or another DLNA server be running on your PC or another network device.
    I don't have any specific recommendations for a true NAS drive....which is what you need....but the link below should provide some ideas:
    http://reviews.cnet.com/best-network-attached-storage/

  • Crystal Reports Server and OpenDocument Solution

    Hello,
    I have just installed a trial version of Crystal Reports Server version 12.
    My objective is to be able to launch in context from another application a report from Crystal Reports.
    So, I have read the document on 'Viewing Reports and Documents using URLs'. I assume this allows you to pass a URL to BusinessIbjects Enterprise Server. Once received, the report is generated and displayed.
    My question is, if I have Crystal Report Server installed, what else do i need to run this functionality?
    I think this is called the opendocument solution? Do i need to install something else ontop of the CRS version 12?
    thanks
    Henry

    If you examine the directories in your webapp (IIS or tomcat) then you should notice an OpenDocument Directory. This is included in our install by default. Then if you have created reports on the server or just using the samples you can use something like http://servername:port/OpenDocument.aspx (for IIS) or OpenDocument.jsp (for tomcat or other java/app) ?sDocName=reportname should open the report.
    You can also add additional parameters if you have the opendocument users guide.
    Regards,
    Tim

Maybe you are looking for