Importing B2B configuration xml

Hi,
Is there another way to import B2B Configuration xml. I was able to import using B2B UI(Administration tab - import).
I would like know whether import can be done thro' database. If possible please provide me steps.
Thanks in advance.

Hello Ramesh,
Any design configuration of B2B can only be imported through UI/Command line utility. Deployment API is also exposed and the details of which can be found here.
http://www.b2bgurus.com/2008/04/deployment-in-oracle-b2b.html
There is no other way except the deployment process (API/UI) to get the configuration data into the deployed/runtime area.
Rgds,Ramesh

Similar Messages

B2B configuration - Import error

I have exported the B2B configuration from the TEST environment and tried to import the same in the prod environment. It gives me the following error.
Import of file MDS_EXPORT_DD_MM_YYYY.zip failed. Unexpected end of ZLIB input stream.
The prod B2B already has some configurations. I have exported only the new agreements that I need to migrate from the TEST.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.

Before you deploy, make sure to edit the tp_MyCompany.xml file. You will find this file in the exported .zip file.
The tp_MyCompany.xml file contains entire information about all the delivery channels, listening channels (if any), callouts(if any) from the server where you exported it. Remove all the information from this file that you don't need and try importing again.
Regards,
Syama

Search Configuration XML import using SharePoint App

I'm trying to import a search configuration XML using a SharePoint App.
I have check the following:
- The XML is correct. I can upload it manually.
- The code works using a console app, but not using the SharePoint app.
Following code:
SearchConfigurationPortability searchConfig = new SearchConfigurationPortability(this.Context);
SearchObjectOwner owner = new SearchObjectOwner(this.Context, SearchObjectLevel.SPWeb);
searchConfig.ImportSearchConfiguration(owner, configurationLocation);
this.Context.Load(searchConfig);
this.Context.ExecuteQuery();
Following error message:
ServerException was caught
The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error.
For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults
(either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior)
on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on
tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server
trace logs.
Thanks!

I'm deploying the app to a SharePoint dev environment in the cloud so I can't see the ULS Logs, unfortunately. The link you suggested states that "managed properties aren’t supported in this deployment model" and this is exactly what I'm trying to provision.
Any other ideas why the above code fails, although stated exactly on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/dn205276(v=office.15).aspx?

Error while import development configuration

I can't import development configuration in NWDS from file. After upload xml file, config-dialog ask me to auth into NWDI.
I enter my login/pass and recieve strange status: DTR auth me well, but CBS can't auth me at all!!
Any ideas?

Hi,
NWDS you need to try this General->Network connections-Active Provider dorpdown change to manual
Add Host button click hostname/IP your server details enter.
After try to import the track.May be help for you.
BR,
Durga.

Steps to configure XML Gateway in Oracle

Steps to configure XML Gateway in Oracle

Hello,
This is not relevant to Integration - B2B as you might want to post this query in Ebusiness suite forum.
Rgds,Ramesh

Queries Related to B2B configuration

Hi,
We are working on EDI-B2B implementation
I have following Queries regarding the configuration in B2B.
1) While Creating the Business Actions we have the following fields
Translation Enabled –yes/no
Validation Enabled –yes/no.
In the Document it says the performance will be impacted if validation is enabled.Needs inputs on this.
2) When we create trading partner (remote or host) why do we set the
Application Sender code and Application receiver ID to the same value.
3) Can we use more than one Trading Partner Identification Type (Duns number AS2 identifier) for the same Trading Partner?
4) If we have more than one outgoing Document like 855,997,856 how we set the outbound Directories in the URI.
Regards
Lalit

Hi Ramesh,
3-->Iin our case SFTP is not part of B2B.It is external to B2B.In B2B we are simply treating as the case of File protocol.
Actually what I asked was we have DUNS number both of the trading Partner(host and remote) so can we use that as the identifer(in the Identification section while creating the trading partner) or do we use names like ACME as we have used in ACME-GLOBALSCHIP sample.
For File protocol it always uses Name as the Identification.
I have few new Queries
1)For some reasons if I have to make changes in the Trading partner name or changing Business Protocol or changes at other places in B2B configuration.
Do we need to create the Agreement again.If yes then do we delete the prevoius agreement or update will work.
Moreover what will happen to the Configuration step.
Just quese and revalidate and redeploy the Agreement.
2) how to move the configuration settings from Development environment to Production Environment.
Export the configuration and import it into production box. Make sure to change the appropriate end point and revalidate and redeploy.
3) I have used the 850.ecs and 850.xsd(also 997 ) in my sample application as the one sent by you.
Though I have developed the 850.ecs and 997.ecs using the B2B document editor as per the Trading partner specification I thinking whether to use new ones or continue using the Old one sent by you because it seems to be the superset.
The only issue is that it has all the segments irrespective of whether they are used or not.
What do you suggest on this.
Depends on your requirement. You can use one shipped with the product.

Importing ATO Configurations

Hi,
We are trying to import ATO configurations on a sales order. Our model structure is like we have a top ATO model (called PATO) with two child ATO models and additional components. The child ATO models are defined with WIP supply type as 'Phantom' in the top ATO model. We can see the entire BOM structure in the intended BOM. We populate the columns top_model_line_ref+ and link_to_line_ref+ in the Order Import interface tables like mentioned in Oracle whitepapers and metalink notes. On import, the order is imported, however the link between the top model and the child lines is broken. We can see the entire configuration on the order form, however not on the configurator HTML page. There we see only the top model. The child ATO models are not included in the final configuration. The column 'link_to_line_id' is also NULL. The Order Import log files gives the error message +"The given node was not found within the model"+. From the log file we made out that this message is coming from the CZ Batch Validation API. It appears that somehow the CZ Batch Validation API is not able to resolve the child/components as under the top model and thus fails. The configuration for the Child ATO models is generated using the CIO java API using a model string. We get the individual configuration of the child ATO models and put them under the top parent ATO model (PATO) and then trying to import the sales order. We are not sure if we are missing anything here. Do we need to populate any other interface tables (like some CZ tables) to support this Order Import. Has someone tried this? Please advise if this is even feasible or not. Any workarounds/alternative solutions?
PATO
| Child ATO1
| Child ATO2
Child ATO1
|OC1
|Option1
|Option2
|OC2
|Option3
|Option4
Child ATO2
|OC1
|Option1
|Option2
|OC2
|Option3
|Option4
Thx,
Nitin

Hi Jason,
I appreciate your inputs on this. It looks like the Order Import is not designed to import configuration of a published model structure (based on our testing). Yes we are able to open the runtime configurator page from Order Management and able to configure the complete nested model structure. We tried to use the batch validation API in an adhoc manner (using pl/sql) and did two tests:
1. Test#1, with the non OCD published nested BOM model structure. We dint pass any config_hdr_id or config_rev_nbr in the initialization message. We did pass the configuration details (component_code, qty, input_seq) in the config_input_list. This created a new configuration and validated it as seen the termination message.
TC70 ->5219597; C70 ->5219517; C70-ENGINE ->5219518; C70-TRANSMISSION ->5219537; C70-V6 -> 5219538; C70-V8 -> 5219539; C70-STANDARD -> 5219540; C70-AUTOMATIC -> 5219541;
<initialize>
<param+name="organization_id">xxxx</param>
<param+name="config_creation_date">12-26-2011</param>
<param+name="database_id">xxxx</param>
<param+name="calling_application_id">660</param>
<param+name="responsibility_id">64351</param>
<param+name="inventory_item_id">5219597</param>
<param+name="read_only">false</param>
<param+name="save_config_behavior">new_revision</param>
<param+name="save_usage_behavior">never</param>
<param+name="user">xxxx</param>
<param+name="pwd">xxxx</param>
</initialize>
l_rec_index := 1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).component_code := '5219597-5219517';
config_input_list (l_rec_index).quantity := 1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).input_seq := l_rec_index;
l_rec_index := l_rec_index +1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).component_code := '5219597-5219517-5219518';
config_input_list (l_rec_index).input_seq := l_rec_index;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).quantity := 1;
l_rec_index := l_rec_index +1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).component_code := '5219597-5219517-5219537';
config_input_list (l_rec_index).input_seq := l_rec_index;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).quantity := 1;
l_rec_index := l_rec_index +1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).component_code := '5219597-5219517-5219518-5219538';
config_input_list (l_rec_index).input_seq := l_rec_index;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).quantity := 1;
l_rec_index := l_rec_index +1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).component_code := '5219597-5219517-5219537-5219540';
config_input_list (l_rec_index).quantity := 1;
config_input_list (l_rec_index).input_seq := l_rec_index;
l_rec_index := l_rec_index +1;
Result:
======
<terminate>
<config_header_id>3730129</config_header_id>
<config_rev_nbr>1</config_rev_nbr>
<valid_configuration>true</valid_configuration>
<complete_configuration>true</complete_configuration>
<exit>save</exit>
2. Test#2, with the OCD published nested BOM model structure. We dint pass any config_hdr_id or config_rev_nbr in the initialization message. We did pass the configuration details (component_code, qty, input_seq) in the config_input_list (like test#1). This created a new configuration and validated it as seen the termination message. But failed. The termination message as seen below:
Config processed successfully
Recieved Response from the server follows ....
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<terminate>
<config_header_id>3729912</config_header_id>
<config_rev_nbr>1</config_rev_nbr>
<valid_configuration>false</valid_configuration>
<complete_configuration>true</complete_configuration>
<exit>save</exit>
<config_outputs><option><ps_node_id>26899222</ps_node_id>
<selection_line_id>138773258</selection_line_id><bom_item_type>1</bom_item_type>
<component_code>5213637</component_code><quantity>1</quantity>
<inventory_item_id>5213637</inventory_item_id>......</option>
</config_outputs><config_messages>
<message>
*<component_code>5213637|1-1323962|1</component_code>*
<message_type>warning</message_type>*
*<message_text>The given node was not found within the model.</message_text></message>*
*<message><component_code>52136371-1320165|1</component_code>*
*<message_type>warning</message_type>*
*<message_text>The given node was not found within the model.</message_text></message>*
............</config_messages></terminate>
Again we have not written any CX's to be executed during the batch validation like you mentioned (postConfigNew event). The batch validation seems to be working fine for non published BOM models, but not for published BOM model structures.
Can you please elaborate or email me the details about the point#2 of launching the configurator during the batch validation. I will go through the impl.guide meanwhile.
Thanks,
Nitin jain

JDeveloper issue while importing B2B schema

Please refer SR #3-1815777171: B2B Configuration wizard fails in JDeveloper
I have defined a document in B2B for VDA4905. When I import this schema in JDev, I get a UTF8 encoding error. Oracle support has created a bug for this. I am reaching out to see, if anyone has encountered this problem and if there is any work around.
Thanks
Shanthi

Please post your xsd (at least a part of it) so that we can check it, I can't see the SR. However, it sounds as a character encoding error. Probably the schema says that it is encoded in UTF-8 (the first line) but actually it uses another encoding (typically the standard Windows encoding). If so there are several solutions.
One is to convert the file into UTF-8, for example with the iconv utility. Note that many editors have problems with UTF-8 files, though, so you may break it if you edit it. You can also try to convert the original file from UTF-8 into something else; if iconv complains about the encoding then the original file is not UTF-8! Experimenting with iconv you can find out what the actual encoding is and how to convert it into what you need.
Another option is to modify the first line of the file and name the correct encoding. In our Swedish systems we often use ISO-8859-1 instead of UTF-8. That allows the use of Swedish characters in the xsd without having to use UTF-8-capable editors.
Finally you could remove all problematic characters if that is possible, i.e. use only standard ASCII characters that are the same in UTF-8 and in the other encodings.
While support may help you fix the problem "for real" you should be able to proceed using one of the workarounds above. Good luck!

Importing third party XML files into form-based publishing

Hi,
I want to import third party XML files into form-based publishing. My problem is that when I open the files, they are presented as normal XML files.
The 'type' property is not set to "form-based publishing". That's the reason no form is linked to the XML file.
Is there a way to change the value of this 'type' property? Then I can set it to "form-based publishing".
Message was edited by: E. van der Palen

Hi,
You should take into account two things:
1. XML Repository filter
System Administration-System Configuration-KM-CM-Repository Filters-choose XML Forms Repository Filter
edit it and add your repository.
After that you have to restart it.
2. Resource Type.
You should modify cm_resourcetype property to set form-based publishing.
You could edit this xml file using form builder and then set this parameter.
Patricio.

Import org.apache.xml.serialize.*;

.java:66: package org.apache.xml.serialize does not exist
import org.apache.xml.serialize.*;
^
i am getting this error while running a java program, which i downloaded from a open source.
i am using J Creator.
i suppose i need to add a class path or package.
can anybody tell me how to do this.
and where can i find that package.
if i can't find that in my system, where can i get it on net.

.java:66: package org.apache.xml.serialize does notThe org.apache.xml.serialize.* package is part of Xerces:
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-j/
http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/index.html

How to log to a file using the log-configuration.xml?

Hello *,
I created following log-configuration.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE log-configuration SYSTEM "log-configuration.dtd">
<log-configuration>
     <log-formatters>
          <log-formatter name="DefaultFormatter" pattern="%25d %-60l %s: %m" type="TraceFormatter"/>
     </log-formatters>
     <log-destinations>
          <log-destination count="10" effective-severity="ALL" limit="1000000" name="DefaultDestination" pattern="FDLB_GUI.%g.trc" type="FileLog">
               <formatter-ref name="DefaultFormatter"/>
          </log-destination>
     </log-destinations>
     <log-controllers>
          <log-controller effective-severity="ALL" maximum-severity="FATAL" minimum-severity="DEBUG" name="DefaultController">
               <associated-destinations>
                    <destination-ref association-type="LOG" name="DefaultDestination"/>
               </associated-destinations>
          </log-controller>
     </log-controllers>
</log-configuration>
From a Web Dynpro view I want to use the log-controller. I'm using the default logger:
Logging location.
private static final com.sap.tc.logging.Location logger =
    com.sap.tc.logging.Location.getLocation(EinstiegView.class);
In the wdInit method I want to log a simple message:
public void wdDoInit()
    //@@begin wdDoInit()
    logger.setEffectiveSeverity(com.sap.tc.logging.Severity.ALL);
    logger.fatalT("test logging to new file logger");
    //@@end wdDoInit()
I see the message in the defaultTrace.0.log, but my own log file doesn't appear.
How to address the log-controller of my log-configuration.xml?
Thanks in advance,
Jürgen Dufner

Hi,
I guess the follwing part of your log-configuration is wrong:
<log-controller
effective-severity="ALL"
maximum-severity="FATAL" m
nimum-severity="DEBUG"
name="DefaultController">
Try to change in log-configuration the value for name in <log-controller> to the start sequence of the packages to be logged. E.g., all our packages should start with com.yourcompanyname.projectname
To log all messages from classes in these packages make the name = com.yourcompanyname.projectname.
Hope that helps,
Regards, Astrid
Therefore I list

The configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML - When using Office 2013 ODT package

All,
I'm experiencing an issue where when using the Office 2013 package pulled down from ODT, that if I try to change the locations of either InfoPath Filler 2013 or Publisher 2013 from the default of Microsoft Office 2013 then I receive the message "The
configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML. Please check the management server event log for more information". If I check Applications and Services\Microsoft\AppV\Server-Management\Admin the error displayed there is "An
error was encountered parsing dynamic configuration file '0'. However I am able to change the shortcut location for all other applications except the above 2. I've tried redownloading the files using the ODT and also changing the version number (so far I've
tried both the 15.0.4631.1002 and 15.0.4659.1001 with the same result).
As all I'm interested in so far is having a package which contains Visio and Project I've tried following the article to exclude all the other Office elements:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj219426(v=office.15).aspx#BKMK_ExcludeAppElement. However the package looks to be the same and when I load it into the management console all the options and elements to Office 2013 are available like they were before
when I hadn't set the exclude tags so I'm not sure whether the ExcludeApp parameters actually work correctly.
This then brings me onto the 3rd issue I've experienced. I have a group for the Visio users and I've set custom security for them to have Visio delivered to them but not Project and then a seperate group for just Project users who will have Project delivered
to them but not have Visio. When testing this sometimes seems to work but other times it seems to trip out and a user just in the Project or Visio group will get all of the Office 2013 applications and under the default location of Microsoft Office 2013. When
trying to spot correlation with this it appears random and can happen to any user on any device. We have sequenced a few applications ourselves where different parts are needed for different users and we have successfully managed this using different security
groups for different applications, just as I'm trying here with Office 2013.
Has anyone else experienced the issue with the "did not contain well formed XML" as at the start of the post and how were you able to resolve this? Also has anyone any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue with the security seeming to trip out
and publish all applications within a package to a user regardless of whether they are in the correct group or not?
The management / publishing servers are 5.0.1224.0 which is SP1 HF4 and the clients are on SP2 HF5.
Thanks

Nicke,
The config files are UTF-8. I did find the same article as yourself, however when searching for the value ‘TakeoverExtensionPointsFrom46=’ within either of the configuration.xml files that text isn’t found.
No sinister reason not to share the file used, just it’s the same structure as referenced in the article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn745895(v=office.15).aspx. The only difference being that I’m using ProPlusVolume and I’ve set a version number (which is the October
2014 update). I’ve even looked to follow the above example as closely as possible in just using the ExcludeApp ID of Access and InfoPath, just to try and prove the process. However I still get the usual full package. The version of the Click-to-Run setup.exe
I’m using is 15.0.4623.1001, so later than the version specified at the end of that article which is 15.0.4619.1000. Where can I expect to see the elements excluded? Will it be when loading the package into the management console or would it just not appear
on the machine when delivered?
<Configuration>
<Add SourcePath="C:\OfficeDeploymentToolV2" Version="15.0.4659.1001" OfficeClientEdition="32">
    <Product ID="ProPlusVolume">
      <Language ID="en-us" />
<ExcludeApp ID="Access" />
<ExcludeApp ID="InfoPath" />
    </Product>
</Add>
</Configuration>
3). We’ve not used global publishing in our environment yet so I will try that. I’ve set both GlobalRefreshEnabled and GlobalRefreshOnLogon to True and when using the command Get-AppvPublishingServer on the client I’m testing with I can see this is pulled
through correctly. I’ve also added the client name to the AD group used to grant access to the package and it is published. However nothing is pulling through onto the Client, so are there any steps I’ve missed or misinterpreted when looking to set this up?
I guess the global publishing is there to keep in with licensing for Office being per device? On a slight aside, as Windows licensing is being changed to allow per user licensing
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-make-per-user-windows-licensing-available-to-enterprise-customers-7000035401/ does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for Office / Project / Visio licenses to go per user as well? We’re a volume license customer
rather than subscription based so I think a lot of the options to selectively deploy Visio and Project are excluded for us.
Dan,
Ok that explains why the security could be tripping out then and leading to this result. As above I’ll try with global publishing and see how I get on.
From what I’ve read / watched I think only one Office 2013 package can be published to a machine, so we would be unable to have a separate package for Visio and a separate package for Project and then attempt to deliver
them both together. If a user wanted both Project and Visio then I guess we’d need to have a combined Project and Visio package to cover than scenario, but then 2 more separate Project and Visio packages for those who would only want either Project and Visio
(I think).
The scenario we’re looking at is to see whether we are able to deliver Project and / or Visio to different users through an AppV package and this will then cover users on XenApp or on fat clients. Only a small proportion of our
users will need access to Project and / or Visio so therefore we’d only have a small amount of Project and Visio licenses.
However from what I’ve tested up to this point and from what I’ve picked up from Forum posts / watched on TechEd sessions is that as publishing is Global and is unable to use different security groups for different elements of the
suite, then using Office through AppV is only suitable if you will be delivering the whole suite (including Project and Visio) to all of your users. So in a scenario where you’d only want certain elements to be delivered to a handful of users then you’d need
to keep with traditional ESD methods to have this installed onto fat clients and steer clear of XenApp. If wanting to install to XenApp then a lockdown tool like AppSense or AppLocker would also need to be brought into the equation.
Is my understanding above correct or have I missed some options / methods?
If the full Office package is always delivered but a company only has Office licenses and no Project and Visio licenses for all its users, how do they stop Project and Visio being delivered and being available? Or again if you have
this use case is the AppV method one which will be unsuitable?
Thanks

APP-V Office 2013 configuration.xml

Hi all,
I'm trying to roll out Office 2013 with APP-V, whenever I change the config.xml to accept the EULA it still pops up with the EULA.
The documentation for APP-V differs from the normal ODT config.xml, what's the difference and am I missing out on something?
See the document from Microsoft on the configuration.xml within app-v:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219426.aspx
The XML file states to accept the EULA. The output in there is a configuration.xml like this:
<Configuration>
<Add SourcePath="C:\office2013" OfficeClientEdition="32" >
<Product ID="O365ProPlusRetail">
<Language ID="nl-nl" />
<Language ID="en-us" />
</Product>
<Product ID="ProjectProRetail">
<Language ID="nl-nl" />
<Language ID="en-us" />
</Product>
<Product ID="VisioProRetail" >
<Language ID="nl-nl" />
<Language ID="en-us" />
</Product>
</Add>
<Display Level="None" AcceptEULA="TRUE" />
<Property Name="SharedComputerLicensing" Value="1" />
</Configuration>
Kind regards,
Jacob van Rooijen

You can use two registry keys to disable it, push them using a GPO:
HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Registration
Reg_DWORD = "AcceptAllEulas"= 1
HKCU\software\policies\microsoft\office\15.0\firstrun
Reg_DWORD = "bootedrtm" = 1
See this post

Error while importing data from XML file to a Oracle database

I am getting the following error while importing data
*** atg.xml.XMLFileException: No XML files were found for "/Dynamusic/config/dynamusic/songs-data.xml".
The files must be located under the name "/Dynamusic/config/dyna
*** java.io.FileNotFoundException: D:\MyApp\ATG\ATG10.0.3 (Access is denied)
java.io.FileNotFoundException: D:\MyApp\ATG\ATG10.0.3 (Access is denied)
        at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method)
        at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(FileInputStream.java:120)
        at atg.adapter.gsa.xml.TemplateParser.importFiles(TemplateParser.java:6675)
        at atg.adapter.gsa.xml.TemplateParser.runParser(TemplateParser.java:5795)
        at atg.adapter.gsa.xml.TemplateParser.main(TemplateParser.java:5241)
I have placed the FakeXADataSource and JTDataSource properties files as required. In fact I have been able to import data in all machines. Just this one machine is giving problems. I have also checked out the access rights. Can someone help me please?

Confirm that you have access to D:\MyApp\ATG\ATG10.0.3 and existence of Dynamusic/config/dynamusic/songs-data.xm

Getting an error while importing Development Configuration file (NW 2.0)

i,
while importing a development configuration file for Webdynpro ( SAP NW 2.0 ), i am getting an error
"Getting Input Stream Failed-> Unable to find the host ..."
But i can ping to the server and tr is also working .
i could see Active and Inactive Objects
Any access permission is needed to download a configuration file.
or whatis the reason for this error.
any preconditions have to be done for importing a configuration file ?

You can try the following:
1. try the fully qualified domain name of the DTR server host in NWDS Preferences->Development Configuration.
2. Are your WAS and JDI are on a higher SP level. That may cause the problem
regards,

Importing B2B configuration xml

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for