In MB51 missing "Amount in LC Crcy"

Hello
we have posted MM document movement type 411 ( consignment )
In MB51
with 411        , +ve qty, amount is showing in "Amount in LC Crcy"
with 411 K     , -ve qty, amount is not showing in "Amount in LC Crcy"
In 411 K , why amount is not showing in "Amount in LC Crcy " ?
Accounting document is already generated
Trans./Ev. Type is :   WA GI, Trsfr Posting, Other Goods Movement
for same previous month transaction, in MB51 411 K. Amount was showing in "Amount in LC Crcy".
thanks
Thomas

Hello Dev
you can see the values from MB51 and from Accounting document ( which was created for this material document) .
Question is, why 0 values is showing in MB51 Report for line item. To Location 411 K
Thanks

Similar Messages

US Withholding tax report for 1099M missing amount

HI all,
When i run the 1099M Listing using S_ALR_87012143 for year 2009 with clearing date of 1/1/09 to 12/31/09 for one vendor,
it shows the cleared and open items TOTAL correctly. This includes one document with posting date of 12/31/2008 and the clearing date is 1/6/2009. The rest of the included documents are with 2009 posting dates and clearing dates.
However, when i run the US: WIthholding tax report for 1099M for this vendor for 2009, although the clearing date is 1/1/09 to 12/31/09, it did not show the correct total. It is missing the amount for one document with posting date of 12/31/2008 and clearing date of 1/6/2009. Is there anyway i could get this missing amount to be included for the year 2009 ?
The tax report is using: S_PL0_09000314 ( RFW1099M ).
Please advise.
thanks
Joyce

no replies

Material Document List MB51 - Residual Amount when Quantity equals to Zero

Dear all,
I've this weird situation in the production system involving one material master as follows:
Material         Description     Plant     Mvt     Posting Date     Quantity     BUn     Loc.curr.amount
10015661     SCREW     61MM     561     30.04.2006     45     PC     2,660.40
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     09.03.2007     96     PC     5,177.43
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     24.03.2008     50     PC     3,124.75
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     27.02.2009     84     PC     4,483.46
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,433.87
10015661     SCREW     61MM     101     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,312.56
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     45-     PC     2,660.40-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     96-     PC     3,823.63-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     50-     PC     3,142.69-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     84-     PC     4,695.03-
10015661     SCREW     61MM     309     07.04.2009     168-     PC     9,261.59-
                                              Sum:      0     PC     609.13
P/S: Sorry if the data gets messy after saving this message because I'm unable to format the columns correctly.
If look closely, there's a residual amount when the quantity is already "ZERO". I tried to simulate in the Quality system but was unable to recreate the same results. By right, the sum amount should be "ZERO" as well.
Would be most grateful for any explanation or advise.
Thank you.
Edited by: Steven Khoo on Apr 6, 2011 12:21 PM

Hi all,
I'm attempting to interpret the report generated by MR51 as below. I noticed there are line items with "RE" accounting document type which is stands for "Invoice - Gross". I can understand WA = Goods Issue and WE = Goods Receipt but why RE? For instance, there's a WE (Goods Receipt) of 50 PCs on 24.03.2008 and followed by a series of RE (Invoice - Gross) between 26.03.2008 and 23.04.2008. I'm confused over here. Thanks.
Material          Material Description     CoCd     ValA
10015661          SCREW                               1125            6110
Type     DocumentNo     Itm     Postg Date      Quantity     BUn      Amt.in loc.cur. Crcy
WA     4900011305     1     07.04.2009     -168     PC     -9,261.59           RM
WA     4900011304     1     07.04.2009     -84     PC     -4,695.03           RM
WA     4900011303     1     07.04.2009     -50     PC     -3,142.69           RM
WA     4900011302     1     07.04.2009     -96     PC     -3,823.63           RM
WA     4900011301     1     07.04.2009     -45     PC     -2,660.40           RM
RE     5100002095     796     31.03.2009     84     PC     254           RM
RE     5100002093     280     31.03.2009     84     PC     211.57           RM
RE     5100002089     276     31.03.2009     84     PC     261.16           RM
WE     5000002412     789     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,312.56           RM
WE     5000002408     271     28.02.2009     84     PC     4,433.87           RM
WE     5000002406     275     27.02.2009     84     PC     4,483.46           RM
RE     5100001398     2     29.04.2008     -96     PC     -1,353.80           RM
RE     5100001385     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     0.68           RM
RE     5100001384     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     0.68           RM
RE     5100001383     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     2.97           RM
RE     5100001382     2     23.04.2008     50     PC     2.31           RM
RE     5100001341     2     26.03.2008     50     PC     11.3           RM
WE     5000001702     1     24.03.2008     50     PC     3,124.75           RM
WE     5000000779     1     09.03.2007     96     PC     5,177.43           RM
WA     4900005345     1     30.04.2006     45     PC     2,660.40           RM
P/S: Sorry, the data gets messy after saving the post.
Edited by: Steven Khoo on Apr 25, 2011 10:11 AM

MB51- Missing sequent Doument number range.

Dear All,
Here when I execute transaction MB51,I am un able to get all MIGO (GR) Document in sequential, even though I have maintain input fields for MB51 only posting date from- to, but when I see MIGO documents in MB51few documents are missing. Where can we see those missing documents and why in between number ranges are missing?
Example :
MB51 number range(MIGO) showing like this 500000645 to 500000660 then, 500000667, 68,69, then 75. now i want to see missing number, where can i see and why it's happening like this.
Kindly advice me to get more things on this issue...
Thanks
Madhusudhan.B

For Eg..
Go to SNRo. choose overview.. YOu ll get a list. choose for eg AUFTRAg..THis is for production orders..
Double click .. you ll see No.Of numbers in the Buffer..It ll be set as 5 ,10 or 20..
If its 20 ,then 20 numbers will be thr in the bufer for assigning to the orders..
PLs check if its maintained...
At the time of server crash or something,This buffer would ve been reset...
That may be ur problem..
Please reset the value in the buffer as 10 or 20 and proceed ur GRs etc...

In transit movement codes - missing amounts

Hi,
In one of my clients it's been implemented the "in transit" inventory procedure (still in development).
We went from having movement codes 647 and 101 in one step, into 641 and 101 in 2 steps. The problem that I see here is that when I go to check field "BW: Cost Val. in Local Currency" or "Local curr. amount", the values for movement code 101 is zero, while in the 641, I get the correct amount, and I need them completed in BW.
Is there any modification in the configuration that could be missed here?
Any idea on how we can have these fields correctly completed from the ECC side instead of BW?
Any help will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Miriam

641- Is two step procedure wherein Stocks are removed from Unrestricted stock of sending location & place it in of stock in transit at recipient hence stock will reflect In Transit. On receiving goods recipient will take goods receipt with movement.
On the other hand 647 is one step procedure wherein goods receipt (101) is added automatically, so that the goods receipt is posted at the same time as the goods issue. hence stock will not be reflected in Transit

Manual Payment (J04102) - Missing Amounts in The Payment Lines (Fold)

Dear Fellows;
I need your helps on this annoying issue.
We use JDE Wolrd in AS400 database environment.
We have a problem in J04102 (Enter Manual Payments) when matching the payment amount with the pay items (invoices).
In the screen, we cannot view the amounts in the lines under "Amount Applied" column. You can only view them if you unfold
the lines with F4 and can you imagine the difficulty we have when there are plenty of pay items and manually copy from the unfold
field and past onto the line?
How to fix it technically. I'd appreciate if you could kindly give me an idea on that?
Many thanks to all.
Kind Regards,
Ozgur

Hi,
Have you check in copy control order to invoice
At item level Pricing type it should be - G
Kapil

Ad hoc query missing amounts

Hi:
I'm having problems in order to obtain amounts from a custom infotype, this custom infotype (9001) is attached to the positions. When I try to obtain information about amounts that I have store in the custom infotype with the ad hoc query, I have the following error:
Error when generating the report (see long text)
Message no. AQ_AD_HOC221
Diagnosis
The report cannot be generated because the internal description is invalid or incomplete, or because the selection screen is too large.
Regenerate the assigned InfoSet, and read the log. If the InfoSet is OK, make sure that at least one field is given as output.
If you used the 'Refresh' icon to start the query, use the 'Output' menu option to execute the query. This gives you a full screen display of the data.
If an output was generated, the query cannot work with actual data in the construction view. In this case, always use the 'Output' function to execute the query.
And I just tried to obtain information of 1 record.
I'm in 640 version.
Thanks in advance!!

Hi Antonio,
Without knowing the structure of your custom infotype, it is difficult to identify the cause of your problem. I would first start with that - use transaction SE11 and make sure the infotype structure and definition for the requested field are correct and activated.
Since the infotype is tied to Position, I would create a new PCH based Infoset (SQ02) with the Position as the key. Then include the IT1001, 1005, 9001, etc as well as the IT0000, 0001, 0002, etc. for Person as Holder. Generate the Infoset, assign it to your user group (via SQ03) and then create an Ad Hoc Query with it.
It is also possible the custom infotype may not work in Ad Hoc, but could if the query is created directly in SQ01. I would also give that a try. Again, the problem is probably in the custom infotype and the field itself or in the generation of your infoset.
Paul

Missing amount field on wbs settlement rule

Investment Profile has Amounts and Percentages set on. We can't see the amount field in CJ02 settlement rule.

Investment Management -> Projects as Investment Measures -> Settlement -> Maintain Settlement Profiles
Define Settlement Profile, select the respective settlement profile which you had problem
Under tab Indicators, check amount settlement, it will appear in the project.

Document missed in Inventory at the time of INIT

Hello,
In Inventory Cube 0IC_C03 we took INIT on 16.Oct.08 at approx 11:56 am.
After a long time today we saw that Closing amount for a particular material is not matching with that of R/3.
When analysed, we found that One material Document was posted on 16.oct.08 at 12:20 pm (the time when we were taking INIT).
Quantity against that document number was pulled into BW but anyhow Amount was left. That day it was first entry for that material also. Now due to absence of Amount againt that Document No., our closing Amount is not matching.
How can we pull the missed Amount without duplicationg other data against that Documnet no. which was already pulled at the time of INIT.
Thanks & Regards
Shilpi Gupta

Hi,
It will be based upon the standard cost at the date of return, if material master has been controlled with moving average price
If the material master has been controlled with standard price, the price doesn't change.
Regards,

EIS dataloads on ASO - missing data during dataloads

We build are building an ASO application with duplicate member names. The member load works fine, but when I load the data, I am missing amounts so some measures are out of balance. In trouble shooting the data, I found if I load just the Agent (level 0) amounts balanced, so I changed the filters to:
1. loaded the Branch for the agent (next level in Heirarchy)- number still balanced
2. loaded the Mgmt Office for the agent (next level in Heirarchy)- number still balanced
3. loaded the Region for the agent (next level in Heirarchy)- number still balanced
But when I load all, I am out of balance. So I created 8 filters in EIS, and loaded the data in 8 steps. All the measures balance when I load in in 8 parts. Has anyone run into this issue?
Running on Windows 2003 Server 16 Gb RAM, 4 processors.
Stats from:
Essbase Input-level data size 10016
Dimension 13
Attrib Dim 3
Measures 32
Largest Dimension 16333 members 12842 stored
All other Dimension <50 members <50 stored
(4 Dim <10 members, 4 Dim bwtween 10-20 members, 3 Dim between 33-34 members, 1 Dim with 44 members)
Number of input cells 862292
Rows from SQL 264519 (4 months of data)

I am loading all the data for that filter and below, so the:
a. first load for just a single agent and check the data.
b. Second load was for the branch with that agent and all other agents in that branch
c. Third was for the Mgmt Office with the same agent and all other agents and Branch in that Mgmt Office
4. Fouth load was for the region with the same agent and all other agents, Branches, and Mgmt Offices in the Region.
Each of those data loads were ok, but when I loaded the Countrywide data (All 8 regions) in one single dataload then I had problems with balancing.
Agent Heirarchy:
CW
Region
Mgmt Office
Branch
Agents

Sainsbury's Gift card wrong amount sent

First post from me so be gentle. I got the Broadband Infinty package with the offer of £100 Sainsbury's gift card. I recieved the card this morning and it's only for £60, how do I go about getting the extra £40?
Thanks in advance for any help

Update: Result! Eventually got another gift card for the missing amount. Hurrah!
Tried calling the "help line" again but gave up in disgust after an hour - it worked for some members, but unfortunately not for me: Suppose it depends on who's at the other end? ..................... And where the other end is!
Anyway, for me, results came when I e-mailed customer services (on-line support). A very pleasant remediation winged into my inbox that evening; the balance came in a card 5 days later. Many thanks to Keeley at the BT Vouchers Team for all her help. There are nice people out there in the Bt World - you've just got to keep trying ...... Sadly
It takes perseverance - but you need to "hang in there"! And look out for the crocs!

SAP query in Grand Totalling in SQ01 wrongly calculation

Dear All,
I have created a SAP query for getting few ledger accounts data in the clients specified format.
But I am having a problem, that debit and credit amounts are getting added in the 'Total' field.
The credit amounts are not getting substracted from the debit amount.
For eg :
CoCd     G/L          Year     DocumentNo      Amount in LC     Crcy     D/C
1000     4071101020          2007     9600000002     3,300.00          H
1000     4071101021          2007     9600001413     40,000.00          S
1000     4071101022          2007     8000000000     2,020,012.80     H
Grand Total                                                                2,063,312.80
Where as total should be -1,983,312.80, where 'H' is credit and 'S' is debit.
rgds

Hiya,
You may need to:
1. Either group by the Debit/Credit Indicator (SHKZG), create two subtotals for each and then subtract one from the other, or,
2. Multiply the Credits by -1 (again use the Debit / Credit Indicator to sort this for you) and then get a total field.
This is an inbuilt problem with queries (SQ01, SQVI, etc.).
Cheers.

User forgot to add delivery costs to purchase order

Got a user that forgot to add delivery costs to a purchase order, now it has been GR and IRd, now they want to add the delivery costs, of course they have to reverse the IR and possibly the GR as well, go to change mode and add this missing condition manually
any other options for doing this?? dont think the invoice has been paid yet
Thanks

Dear Mark Ojo.
Try to think of this missing activity, User/Client can mistake/forget this delivery cost
at anytime. so, you can consider for solving this missing amount as below ;
   - If already this finished the GR and IR procedures, (but invoice has not been paid yet),
     best way is also cancellation of entire posted document, but i think that you just try to
     apply this delivery cost to MIRO (--> Unplanned delivery costs).
   1) MIRO --> "Unplanned delivery costs" on the Detail Tab Screen.
      If you are using the conventional Invoice Verification component, the system splits up the
      delivery costs entered among the individual items, based on the amounts invoiced so far
      plus those in the invoice being entered.
      If you are using Logistics Invoice Verification, how the unplanned delivery costs are posted
     depends on the Customizing settings. There are two possibilities:
       - Unplanned delivery costs are split up as in conventional Invoice Verification.
       - Unplanned delivery costs are posted in a separate posting line to a G/L account set
         up for this.
     2) MIRO --> "Subsequent Debit" on the first screen.
         Specifies which transaction you can choose "Subsequent Debit" for such as when you
         received an invoice from your vendor for delivered goods.Delivery costs are to be charged.
         on the other hand, if you received a credit memo for delivered goods(previously charged
         delivery costs are to be credited) , you can choose "Subsequent Credit".
Regards,
Jeong, Yeong-Chul

View history screen in FC Valuation of previous months

Dear Experts;
I am a newbie in SAP FICO, and looking for your value helps;
In 31.12.2011, my customer ran FC Valuation through FAGL_FC_VAL - Foreign Currency Valuation (New) and several postings had been made, including valuation postings for AR open items.
At that time of simulation screen, users not check details and origin of the FC postings for AR.
Now they checked these postings again and wonder where the amounts came from.
I have to run FAGL_FC_VAL with valuation key date: 31.12.2011, only "Reset valuation" ticked in "Postings" Tab and "Valuate Customer Open Items" ticked in "Open items", the postings not the same with postings that users posted earlier.
Do you know function/report that can re-display the screen at the time users run FAGL_FC_VAL?
X postings        XX Messages
Company ABC                       Foreign Currency Valuation               Time 13:42:08     Date 07.03.2012
Key Date 31.12.1
Valuation in Company code currency (10)
Method EVR Always valuate
Ledger Group 0L
Ld AccTy G/L        Account Nu DocumentNo Itm     Amount in FC Crcy      Amount in LC Local Curr Exch. Rat S Exch.rate Typ Valuation diff.   New Difference    Amount Posted
Any suggestions will get points! Thanks so much for your help!
Best Regards;
Trish

It would make more sense to ask the plug-in maker, they designed it for FF they should know what is wrong. http://www.property-bee.com/forum/

IN MB5T values are coming Nil

Hi Expert
In MB5T,Amount in LC Crcy and Net order value currency is coming Nil.
I check in PO history tab for Mvt Type 641 i m getting the value, but in MB5T its not showing
Regard
Nabil

Looks like this is bug, could you check if note 119669 and 203172 could solve your problem?

In MB51 missing "Amount in LC Crcy"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for