Inbound idoc error in 51 Status of at least one serial number of item

Dear Experts,
There is one inbound IDOC which is in error with status 51 showing error Status of at least one serial number of item is not allowed.
Can you please advice why this error is coming.
Thanks & Regards,
Nikhil Kanegaonkar.

An inbound IDOC in error will have the status 51, & it is marked for deletion it has a status of 68.
http://www.dataxstream.com/2009/10/mass-status-change-sap-idoc/
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/IDoc+Statuses
Edited by: Krupaji on May 6, 2011 2:38 PM

Similar Messages

Unable to post the Purchase Order inbound idocs which are in status 64

Hi
While Processing the inbound idocs which are in status 64 for message type: PORDCR i am getting the
idoc into error status 51 saying the error as "Missing authorization: Purchase Order Create Purchasing Grou V10"
We are getting the inbound idocs from third party and we need to post these idocs in production.
Can any one help me out how to proceed further on this.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Phani Miriyala.

Hi
Thank you very much for your quick response.
As the same user is able to process the idocs of message type PORDCR which are in status 64 successfully previously.
Regards,
Phani Miriyala.

Inbound IDOC error 51 Application Document not posted

Inbound IDOC error 51: Item: 002 Goods/Service number not entered So application document not posted.
Please help me out

hi
check whether service number is available in the idoc if not check the field mapping

When i want to ask the guaranty status of my apple wireless keyboard, i got an error: apple keyboard We're sorry, but this serial number is not valid. Please check your information and try again.

When i want to ask the guaranty status of my apple wireless keyboard, i got an error: apple keyboard We're sorry, but this serial number is not valid. Please check your information and try again.

If you purchased the iPhone from Apple or an authorized Apple reseller,
contact them for assistance. If you purchased elsewhere, go back
to that retailer and get them to give you a new iPhone or your money
back.
If you have checked the serial number carefully and re-entered it
and that gave you the same error message, contact Apple if purchased
from Apple or authorized retailer; otherwise you have been scammed
and need to pursue the matter with the business you obtained the
iPhone from.

I purchased and downloaded Lightroom 5.5. After installing it, I was prompted for the serial number. When I entered it an error message appeared saying it was an upgrade serial number and I need to enter my original purchase number. This was my original p

I purchased and downloaded Lightroom 5.5. After installing it, I was prompted for the serial number. When I entered it an error message appeared saying it was an upgrade serial number and I need to enter my original purchase number. This was my original purchase, not an upgrade. Now what do I do?

It sounds like you bought an upgrade from Adobe. How much did you pay? The upgrade is about $80, and the non-upgrade is about $150. If you bought an upgrade version and had no previous version, you would see what you're seeing.
If that is the case and I were you, I'd call Adobe, and arrange for a refund and to order the correct version.
Hal

Error: Find criteria must contain at least one sort field value.

Hi
I am getting the followng error in Sort.as when I click on a column in a DataGrid that is bound to a nested property (e.g. parent.name)
Error: Find criteria must contain at least one sort field value.
I can see why this is failing.
In the findItem function of Sort.as the code tests whether there is data in line (456) hasFieldName = values[fieldName] !== undefined. This fails and so an error is raised later in the function by:
 if (fieldsForCompare.length == 0) {
 message = resourceManager.getString("collections", "findRestriction");
 throw new SortError(message); }
The code needs to traverse down the object hierarchy to get the field so that error is not thrown .
The code needs to traverse down the object hierarchy to get the field so that error is not thrown .
In the case of a non nested property, everything works fine.
There is lots of discussion about nested properties in DataGrid and there is this jira:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-9801
There is talk of using a labelFunction or an itemRenderer and other third party solutions (extensions of DataGridColumn).
Is this a bug? is there a workaround using labelFunction or itemRenderer which can stop the error in Sort.as?
James
Here is the code of findItem in Sort.as of SDK 3..4.0.9271
public
function findItem(items:Array,values:Object,
mode:String,
returnInsertionIndex:Boolean =
false,compareFunction:Function =
null):int{
var compareForFind:Function;
var fieldsForCompare:Array;
var message:String;
if (!items){
message = resourceManager.getString(
"collections", "noItems");
throw new SortError(message);}
else if (items.length == 0){
return returnInsertionIndex ? 1 : -1;}
if (compareFunction == null){
compareForFind =
this.compareFunction;
// configure the search criteria
if (values && fieldList.length > 0){
fieldsForCompare = [];
//build up the fields we can compare, if we skip a field in the
//middle throw an error. it is ok to not have all the fields
//though
var fieldName:String;
var hadPreviousFieldName:Boolean = true;
for (var i:int = 0; i < fieldList.length; i++){
fieldName = fieldList[i];
if (fieldName){
var hasFieldName:Boolean;
try
hasFieldName = values[fieldName] !==
undefined;}
catch(e:Error){
hasFieldName =
false;}
if (hasFieldName){
if (!hadPreviousFieldName){
message = resourceManager.getString(
"collections", "findCondition", [ fieldName ]);
throw new SortError(message);}
else
fieldsForCompare.push(fieldName);
else
hadPreviousFieldName =
false;}
else
//this is ok because sometimes a sortfield might
//have a custom comparator
fieldsForCompare.push(
null);}
if (fieldsForCompare.length == 0){
message = resourceManager.getString(
"collections", "findRestriction");
throw new SortError(message);}
else
try
initSortFields(items[0]);
catch(initSortError:SortError){
//oh well, use the default comparators...
else
compareForFind = compareFunction;

I have tried a sortCompareFunction:
var sort:Sort = new Sort();
sort.compareFunction = compareFunction;sort.fields = [sortField];
data.sort = sort;
data.refresh();
this makes no difference.
James

Inbound IDOC error - status code 52- application document not fully posted

Hi,
In Inbound IDOC, the status code is 52 ---> Application document is not fully posted(satus of the inbound idoc is in yello colour). I want to reprocess this idoc in BD87 t.code in order to convert the yellow colour to green colour. Before reprocessing the IDOC, i need to rectify the problem and then reprocess the idoc in bd87. am i correct? if yes, what i need to do to solve the error --->application document not fully posted. Please guide me friends.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sri

HI
If you are FM to process the inbound IDOC,
possibilities are like below .
Reason 1 :
In partner profiles, check is it trigger immediately or not ? for particular partner profile which u r using .
reason 2 :
If you are using BDC code to update the data .if any screen contains error then also you will get the status in yellow .
reason 3 :
Have you tried with TCODE BD87 , might be it is processing error also .
i have worked on same probelm so if u r not solved with the issue after trying above 3 reasons .
reply me back .

Inbound Idoc error notification. Help needed

Hi Gurus,
Sorry, maybe it's a silly question.
I have a requirement to send an email when occurs any kind of error at inbound processing. The dest. of this mail must be the postprocessing agent from partner profile (WE20) of the message.
I have standard and custom process codes.
I've followed notes 44416 and 11610 but it still doesn't works.
Somebody knows how can I achieve that?
Thanks in advance,
David Gimeno.

Thanks to all, but it still don't works.
J&Y: this report is necessary to process error Idocs? As I understand, notifys an alert message if a max number of error idoc is reached.
I've done the following things:
- Define custom message type (WE81)
- Bind message (custom) with Idoc type (standard) (WE82)
- Define FM with message type (we57)
- Define FM attributes (BD51)
- Define Process. Code (WE42)
- Define Partner profile with my custom Process Code.
I've tried to link my custom process code with an Standard Object (IDOCAPPL and IDOCPACKET) at BD67, but system brings me the message B1405 Application object type is not planned .
I've defined all tasks at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b81b943d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm as standard tasks, and I've assigned it to a Org. Structure.
Finally, I enter an Idoc with an error wich brings to Idoc status 51 but I have no error notification. (I've found at SWI1 but no work item is generated).
Does anyone knows what I'm doing wrong, or what else can I do?
Thanks all in advance!!!!

Inbound IDOC error while processing Invoice

Hi All,
I received the following error while processing an Invoice on an inbound IDOC:
Field BSEG-MEINS - does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0300
Message no. 00349
Diagnosis
The specified field does not exist on the screen
Procedure
Check your batch input data
Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Inno

Hi
Please check which G/L Accounts were involved and verify that the Field BSEG-MEINS was set to 'optional' in Transaction OB14. The correct Field Status Variant
for the Company Code can be viewed with Transaction OBY6 and the Field
Status Group for G/L Account can be found with Transaction FS00 under
the Create/bank/inter Tab. This should eliminate the Error 00 349.
Regards
Javier

Inbound IDOC error :51 Passed with out Message Type to ALE Layer

Hi,
I am struct wtih the inbound IDOC scenario ..XI able to send IDOC but at ECC side it is in 51 red status and the error message is
"IDOC passed without Message type to ALE Layer"
Do I need to pass these segment values in Message Mapping? I didnt mapped any MESTYP,SNDPOR,SNDPRT and so on.. disabled these fields...
Could any one light on this issue?
Thanks
Rajeev

>
rajeev raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am passing values in MM as below:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <ZPORDCR01>
> <IDOC BEGIN="Constant">
> <EDI_DC40 SEMENT="Constant">
> <TABNAM>Constant</TABNAM>
> <DIRECT>Constant</DIRECT>
> <IDOCTYP>ZOrders</IDOCTYP>
> <CIMTYP>Constant</CIMTYP>
> <MESTYP>Z_Orders</MESTYP>
> <SNDPOR>B0009</SNDPOR>
> <SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
> <SNDPFC>LS</SNDPFC>
> <SNDPRN>PD_100</SNDPRN>
> <RCVPOR>DEV</RCVPOR>
> <RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
> <RCVPRN>Dev10</RCVPRN>
> <REFINT>GB</REFINT>
> <REFGRP>MTI</REFGRP>
> <REFMES></REFMES>
> <ARCKEY>20090909</ARCKEY>
> </EDI_DC40>
> <E1PORDCR SEGMENT="Constant">
>
> I am forwarding these values in MM... IDOC is successfully reaching in ECC but with 51 error in red... Logical system, post and message types are avaliable in Control record of the IDOC which received wiht errors in ECC.
>
> Thnaks
> Rajeev
Fill the TABNAME as EDI_DC40 and Direct as 2 (represents the inbound direction) and resend the idoc and check
Rajesh

Inbound Idoc error

Hi ,
I am getting error in Inbound idoc as follows "CC. .EX.593 does not exist" when i go to BD 87
and process it says "order is not valid for making status changes ".
can some one please guide how to solve this error "CC. .EX.593 does not exist"?
Thanks,
Pradeep.

This is a data problem .Closing it.
Edited by: Pradeep Akula on Jun 15, 2011 7:10 AM

MRESCR01 inbound IDOC error: "Object type 'TRANSID ' has no relationship '

Hello,
I am trying to get an inbound IDOC from XI to a SAP R/3 System.
It's an extended idoc (MRESCR01) for create orders.
The error at /we02 in the inbound system is:
Object type 'TRANSID ', key '0A1F032A59B345D027B002DE ', log.system ' ' has no relationship 'OUTTID '
Message no. RL007
Diagnosis
All the roles used in relationships of type 'OUTTID' should be found for object type 'TRANSID' with key '0A1F032A59B345D027B002DE' in logical system ''.
System Response
No such roles were found.
Further information:
XI process message succesfully, with the Z segments extended information. But, at the WE02, only one of the 3 extended segments arrives to SAP R/3.
Thanks a lot for your help, best regards

thanks shridar and michal for response.
these solution solved the problem of the segments. now the 5 arrives to SAP R/3.
but i keep getting the error and IDOC is not processed:
IDOC STAT = Status 51
Object type 'TRANSID ', key '0A1F032A59B345D03A7A0A26 ', log.system ' ' has no relationship 'OUTTID '
Message no. RL007
Diagnosis
All the roles used in relationships of type 'OUTTID' should be found for object type 'TRANSID' with key '0A1F032A59B345D03A7A0A26' in logical system ''.
System Response
No such roles were found.
Thanks and best regards,

Workitem not triggered for Inbound IDOC Error (ORDERS05)

Hi,
The work item is triggered for the Syntax Error in the Idoc (EDI: Partner profile Not Available).
But, as per my requirement i need to get the idoc error status (as Workitem) , any help regarding the resolution of this issue is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Rusidar S.

Hi Uwe,
Many thanks for your response, well i did run the report name that you said me.. when i executed that report i got a workitem as "ALARM Message from Active IDoc Monitoring" and workitem for EDI syntax errors"EDI: Partner profile inbound not available"
But my objective remains unsolved.. i need the error status of idoc to be generated, do u have any idea or solutions, kindly share it as its the 3rd day that am still into the same task....
Regards,
Rusidar S.

Scheduling agreement inbound idoc error.

Hi Experts,
I am creating an Scheduling Agreement with DELFOR02 inbound idoc, while creation the Scheduling Agreement system is giving error regarding Scheduling Agreement not found. In fact I have create the Scheduling agreement by T-code VA31. And I check the table VLPKM, there are relevant record stored.
Then I maintain the view V_T663A to not check everything when inbound idoc recevie. and tried agan in t-code BD87. the system give me another message Make an entry in all required fields.
How can I handle these error messages?
Thanks..
Regards....

Does any one has ideas for that?
Thanks.

Inbound IDOC Mass processing - No status message

Hi Friends,
I am updating a database table using inbound IDOC. But in batch job when XI passes multiple IDOCS,
for some IDOCs there is no status message even though i coded for status message.
If i rerun IDOC in BD87 then it work fine.
please help.
regards,
madan

Hi Madan,
Since you are loading multiple idoc to the system due to high load in the production system data is not commiting properly. So use external commit work statement in you code. this will reduce the performance but logic will work.
COMMIT WORK [AND WAIT].
Effect
The statement COMMIT WORK completes the current SAP LUW and opens a new one, storing all change requests for the current SAP LUW in the process. In this case, COMMIT WORK performs the following actions:
It executes all subroutines registered using PERFORM ON COMMIT.
The sequence is based on the order of registration or according to the priority specified using the LEVEL addition. Execution of the following statements is not permitted in a subroutine of this type:
PERFORM ... ON COMMIT|ROLLBACK
COMMIT WORK
ROLLBACK WORK
The statement CALL FUNCTION ... IN UPDATE TASK can be executed.
Triggering an internal event for the Persistence Service of the Object Services.
If event handlers are registered by the Persistence Service, these collect the changes to the objects managed by the Persistence Service and transfer them via CALL FUNCTION ... IN UPDATE TASK to a specific update function module that is registered as the last update module.
This executes all high-priority (VB1) update function modules in the order of their registration and in a common database LUW. If you do not specify the addition AND WAIT, the program does not wait until the update work process has executed it (asynchronous updating), but instead is resumed immediately after COMMIT WORK. However, if the addition AND WAIT is specified, program processing after COMMIT WORK will not continue until the update work process has executed the high-priority update function modules (synchronous updating).
When all high-priority update function modules are completed successfully, the statement executes the low-priority (VB2) update function modules in the order of registration together in a common database LUW.
After the execution of high-priority update function modules, the individual function modules registered using CALL FUNCTION ...IN BACKGROUND TASK|UNIT are executed in a separate database LUW for each destination.
Within an update function module started using COMMIT WORK, the execution of statements that lead to a database commit is not permitted. In particular, the following are forbidden:
Thanks,
Raghav

Inbound idoc error in 51 Status of at least one serial number of item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for