Incoterms issue

Hi,
I have this situation....
I need to change on all invoices (transport to Switzerland) the incoterms
conditions from "DDU" to "DDP".How and where I can do it??
And I need this only for this contry...
Thanks in advance and regards.
William

Hi,
You can update the customer master data for customers in Switzerland.
You can change the inco term in transaction XD02 -> Sales Area data->billing document tab.
From the customer master records, the SAP System copies the Incoterms automatically into the sales and distribution documents.
Reward if helpful.
Thanks

Similar Messages

ME2O Transaction-IncoTerms issue

Hi,
I am using ME2O to create deliveries. But it was found that the IncoTerms are not populated in the created documents.
I debugged the process flow to find an Exit/BADI where I would be able to populate the Incoterm values , but I am yet to find any that would meet my requirement.
Please advise a possible solution to this issue.
Regards,

Okay let me tell you another way.
Go to Transaction ME2O, Note the program (RM06ELLB for ME2O)
Go to SE38, enter the program RM06ELLB
Select attributes and press display
Note the package name.
Go to SE37, press F4 on Functional Module, then enter the package name..
Then Press enter.. You will find all user exit and badi, which can be used for the transaction ME2O.

Header and Item Incoterms different in Sales order

Hello SAP Guru's,
I have an unique issue of Incoterms in Sales order item being different from the Header, when this happens any change to the header Incoterms is not getting copied to sales order Items.
The issue is due the different Division maintained for Sales order item in the Material master, which is fetching the Inco 2 from the Different Sales area for this is customer.
This is fine as per design where Item category is checked for Business data and Sales Document type is checked for different Division in the config.
However the Business would like the Header Incoterms to be copied to all items and any change in Header should also be copied to Line items also.
We had narrowed down on Couple of Alternatives:
Remove the Business data allowed check in the Item category config
But this would allow all Business data to be copied from sales order header to items
2. Make changes to VBKD user Exit during Sales order creation to copy the Incoterms from Sales order header to items
But this is causing multiple lines in VBKD and some issues while adding new items in VA02 ending with an Update termination.
Would like to know whether there is any other Option whether there would be least impact and also would like your advice on the better Option between the above two Options.
Thanks and Regards
Mohammed Roshan

Hi Lakshimipathi,
Finally we removed the Business Item check in the Item category which is causing the Header incoterms and any changes in Header incoterms to be copied to Sales Order line items as required but we have an issue where Sales Order item Pricing date is being greyed out due these changes, Currently the Sales order Pricing date is being determined through a Z table triggered from a User Exit which was also editable in Sales order item level.
Due to these new changes Sales order pricing date is being determined in the header and getting copied to the Sales order line item thus greying out the Sales order item pricing date field.
Would like to know your thoughts on how removing the Business Item check in Item category in VOV7 is causing the grey out of sales Order item pricing date, where the Business can modify on certain occasions and what would the workaround to restore the functionality of Sales order item pricing date.
Appreciate your inputs on this.
Thanks and Regards
Mohammed Roshan

Default Incoterms & terms of payment - PO

Hi Experts,
I have created the SC with prefered vendor, which will converted to fixed vendor later in SC using the doc change BADI.
But the issue is there when the SC is converted into PO after approval, not populated with default incoterms and terms of payment from vendor master.
However it is defaulting correctly when the PO is being created from the SC with contract and changing the vendor of the PO.
Can any one let me know the cause for this issue?
<<Text removed by moderator>>
SRM 5.0 (SRM_SERVER 5.5) - ECS, SP - SAPKIBKT14
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaj S.
Edited by: Matt on Oct 26, 2010 9:07 AM

>
Pushparaj Susaraj wrote:
> Hi Muthu,
>
>
> This is for your information that my SC & PO has both prefered vendor 39 & fixed vendor 19 in BBP_PD. Is it correct? -
it is due to your logic 39 to 19 conversion logic
deactivate change badi and create sc you can see only 39 .
> One more information, that there is no payment terms & incoterms in PO, when I create SC from internal catalog and then PO.
-- the vendor data has purchase organisation / payment terms and inforecord .kindly check this combination existing for that vendor in manage business parter tranasation in the web.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Pushparaj S.

Change incoterms for delivery at creation of return purchase order

Hi all,
When we create a PO with a return item we always create a delivery to post the goods issue. Therefore we've to create a customer from the vendor master record. In the customer master record the incoterms are defined. But sometimes the incoterms for the return items are different.
Is there a way to set the incoterms in the purchase order that is taken over in the delivery? This is possible with the shipping conditions (shipping tab in PO).
Regards,
Maarten

Hi Adithya,
I too facing the same kind of requirement, can u please let me know how you achieved sending multiple idocs.
Thanks,
Kashif

EXIT/BADI for ME31L and ME31K for changing Incoterms in header and item

Hi All,
I am facing an issue in ME31L,ME32L transactions.
In vendor master , incoterm is maintained .So whenever a PO is created with particular vendor, the same incoterm(EKKO-INCO1& EKKO-INCO2) will get defaulted into PO as well. Now i need to change the incoterms2 on basis of some logic, but i was not able to find the correct BADI/EXIT to do these changes.
This relation can be seen in vendor master partner profile.
SO if I create a PO/SA with a vendor and goods supplier is different the incoterm from vendor is getting defaulted there, not from goods supplier .
So am looking for any EXIT/BADI which will enable changing of Incoterms2 based on the incoterms1 value.
Thanking you in advance.
satheesh

HI Sharma,
Thank you for your response.
This particular BADI ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED is getting triggered when i am creating a SA in ME31L but when I am changing the values in the BADI that is not getting updated on the screen.
thanks,
satheesh

Collective Invoice - Actual Goods Issue date

Hi Friends,
Collective invoice topic has been discussed many times but I didn't find exact solution to solve my issue.
From sap help and few other threads it is learnt that Billing type, Billing date, Payer, Billing unit, Terms of payment, Incoterms, Letter of credit should be same to have collective invoice. During my tests it is understood that apart from those Actual Goods Issue date (Post Goods Issue) date should be same to have collective invoice for different sales orders/deliveries. In my tests SAP didn't consider Billing date but it did consider Actual GI date. In other words, even the billing date and other requirements are same invoice split happend due to different Actual GI date. However collective invoice created even though the billing date is different but Actual GI date is same.
My user creates one sales order and one delivery for a customer once in a week (so 4 orders/deliveries in a month) and creates Invoice by end of the month with collective invoice. So based on the above tests I can ask the user to create sales orders, deliveries every week but perform Post Goods Issue month end and then create invoice so that collective invoice can be done. But the issue is they want to do the Post Goods Issue every week because the stock levels should reduce on weekly basis. So how can we create collective invoice even though the Post Goods Issue is done weekly (so Actual GI date will be different)
Any idea? Please let me know if further information required.
Thank you

Hi,
You may consider writing a routine under copying requirements so that invoice is not split even if the Actual GI date is different.
Consider the following [thread|Collective billing; for more info.
Regards,
Amit

How to make a mass change for incoterms of a scheduling agreement at item level.

Hi SAP Guru,
There are many wrongly assigned incoterms in the scheduling agreement at item level by a user exit which was implemented recently in production. May i know if there is any way that we can revert those changes back to the original incoterms via mass change? I've tried to search over the internet and it seems like there is no posting about this issue before. Please help urgently. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shawn

You can use the following sample to develop your usecase.
Here, we would show menu items only for the nodes at level 3.
You can also download the entire sample based on POJO at
http://adfsampleapplications.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/TreeSampleApplication.zip
The code is self explanatory.
Let know, if you have any specific questions.
<af:form id="f1">
<af:treeTable value="#{bindings.continents.treeModel}" var="node"
selectionListener="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="tt1" columnStretching="last">
<f:facet name="nodeStamp">
<af:column id="c1">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot2"/>
</af:column>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="pathStamp">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot1"/>
</f:facet>
*<f:facet name="contextMenu">*
*<af:popup id="p1" contentDelivery="lazyUncached">*
*<af:setPropertyListener from="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.depth}"*
*to="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth}"*
*type="popupFetch"/>*
*<af:menu text="menu 1" id="m2">*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Districts" id="cmi1"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Attractions" id="cmi2"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*</af:menu>*
*</af:popup>*
*</f:facet>*
</af:treeTable>
</af:form>
Thanks,
Navaneeth

PRICING ISSUE BADI ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE- URGENT

Hi Guys,
My requirement was to trigger new pricing on change of Delivery Date. I have to retrigger pricing only if there is any change in fields EKKO-INCO1, EKKO-INCO2, EKPO-MATNR and EKPO-ADRNR.
For the same I have implemented three badi's and one pricing routine.
BADI's are -
ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE - Method DEFINE_CALCTYPE : Setting the Flag CH_X_LF_CALCTYPE If there is difference between the old value and new value of Fields mentioned above.
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS - Method RECALCULATE_ITEMS Setting the Flag CH_X_RECALCULATE. If there is change in the Incoterms field at PO Header.
In these BADI's I am checking if there is any change in the above mentioned fields. It retrigger the Pricing.
I have implemented one more BADI (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST-Method PROCESS_SCHEDULE) which will trigger the pricing process, If we change the delivery date. This will pick the current delivery date and EXPORT it to memory ID which will be later IMPORTED to pass on this date to pricing header based on which the Pricing will be done on the changed delivery date. ( I hope I am correct here )
I have a pricing routine for one of the condition type in pricing. I am exporting the changed delivery date to the routine and replacing the value of KOMK-PRSDT with this new delivery date.
The issue is, When I do changes for the first time the pricing is working correctly. And I am able to see the PO field values for which the condition record is matched in the pricing analysis .But when I am saving the PO and again changing the values of Delivery date and any one of the fields mentioned. Pricing Analysis shows the same old values of PO fields for which the condition records were matched on last pricing cycle.
Please let me know where I am wrong or where I can correct to display the current values of PO fields for which the condition records matched in the Pricing Analysis.
Regards,
Mayank
PS : Points will be rewarded for all the helpful posts.
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai

Try this...
After importing the memory fields use FREE to free the memory....
That will solve your priblem...
Reward if helpful...

Pricing Issue Pricing Analysis - BADI ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE

Hi Guys,
My requirement was to trigger new pricing on change of Delivery Date. I have to retrigger pricing only if there is any change in fields EKKO-INCO1, EKKO-INCO2,EKET-EINDT, EKPO-MATNR and EKPO-ADRNR.
For the same I have implemented three badi's and one pricing routine.
BADI's are -
ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE - Method DEFINE_CALCTYPE : Setting the Flag CH_X_LF_CALCTYPE If there is difference between the old value and new value of Fields mentioned above.
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS - Method RECALCULATE_ITEMS Setting the Flag CH_X_RECALCULATE. If there is change in the Incoterms field at PO Header.
In these BADI's I am checking if there is any change in the above mentioned fields. It retrigger the Pricing.
I have implemented one more BADI (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST-Method PROCESS_SCHEDULE) which will trigger the pricing process, If we change the delivery date. This will pick the current delivery date and EXPORT it to memory ID which will be later IMPORTED to pass on this date to pricing header based on which the Pricing will be done on the changed delivery date. ( I hope I am correct here )
I have a pricing routine for one of the condition type in pricing. I am exporting the changed delivery date to the routine and changing the value of KOMK-PRSDT with this new delivery date value.
The issue is, When I do changes for the first time the pricing is working correctly. And I am able to see the PO field values for which the condition record is matched in the pricing analysis .But when I am saving the PO and again changing the values of Delivery date and any one of the fields mentioned. Pricing Analysis shows the same old values of PO fields for which the condition records were matched on last pricing cycle.
Please let me know where I am wrong or where I can correct to display the current values of PO fields for which the condition records matched in the Pricing Analysis.
Regards,
Mayank
PS : Points will be rewarded for all the helpful posts.

hi this is the code:
method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM.
DATA:   RE_DATA TYPE MEPOITEM,
          IM_DATA TYPE MEPOITEM.
     CALL METHOD IM_ITEM->get_data
     RECEIVING
        RE_DATA = RE_DATA.
MOVE 'B' TO RE_DATA-calctype.
CALL METHOD IM_ITEM->set_data
         EXPORTING
            IM_DATA = RE_DATA.
endmethod.
Upon creation of PO error message prompt
'Data from Business Add-In ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST not adopted'

Incoterms on Item level is not updated on STO.

Issue: they have created a STO with wrog incoterm, now the issue is that the Incoterms on PO--> Item level is not updated if Incoterms on Header level is changed. I suggested them to change incoterm on item level manually, but user is saying the problem is that SAP doesn't change automatically Incoterms on item level if Incoterms on Header level are changed??
What user is saying..Is this correct? or any thoughts/solution to fix this issue?
Can anyone suggest me on this?
Thanks & Regards
Suresh Babu

HI,
Try this link
How Incoterms gets defaulted for STO
Regards
KK

Intrastat GRWR without Incoterms

Hello,
I've maintained the GRWR = 100% on incoterm level.
1. Now I've got the issue that no incoterm was entered in the po. statistical value remains 0 and results in an error in declaration.
2. if i maintain the incoterm now, and want to update the price determination it's not possible anymore.
Do you have any ideas on those points?
Thank you very much.
regards, Paul.

Hi,
Check on it:-
Intrastat GRWR condition
INTRASTAT Receipt Declaration - Statistical Value not correct
SD FI Interface
Hope it will be helpful.
pherasath

Incoterms copping second line Item!!

Hi
I have created a condition type Shipping Charges and maintained access sequence, for this I have maintained condition record with three diferent values ( like Eg: incoterm Z50- 50 USD ).
The issue is when creating order the Item details I am entering the Incoterm Z50, The value 50 USD is automatically determing for another line Item and Header as well. In condition Type I have never choose for header under Changes which can be made block also. Still the Incoterm value copping header also.
As per my scenarion The incoterm I have to be add for one line item only.
How to restrict that an Incoterm will be can add for one line Item? Please suggest me where can I rrestric
By
VJ

Hi Mr Charles,
The Condition type is I heve maintain for Item Condition. When I enter the incoterm in Item details Eg: Z50 Its getting include Shipping Charges 50 USD in condition tab in the item pricing, Then when I go to second Item Incoterm there also Z50 is appearing and the condition tab it's getting add the Shipping Charges value and header pricing as well...
In condition type I customize As Condition Class: Discount or Durcharge
                                                   Calculate Type : Quantity
                                                   Cond Category : Freight
                                                   Rounding Rule : Commercial
                                                  Manula Entries   : No restrictions and I choose the check box for Item Condition, Delete, Amount/Percent.
Those are I have amintained in condition type..
Please suggest me that still where can I restrict it the Incoterm value not to determine automatically for another line Item and header as well....
Regards
VJ

Incoterms by ship-to

Our company has different incoterms by ship-to . I understand that in SAP, we are maintaining incoterms by Sold-to.   I am exploring the various options that I can suggest to the business. Below are my findings
1.     Change the value in the sales order by the desired inco-term
2.     Use Customer Material Info record to maintain incoterm value by customer and material. But then, if two ship-tos are using the same product, this wont be helpful
3.     Enhancement in MV45AFZZ. I have found this piece of code in forums to fetch Incoterms from ship-to-party instead of sold-to-party
FORM userexit_move_field_to_vbkd USING us_posnr.
IF us_posnr = 0 AND svbkd-tabix = 0 AND NOT kuwev-inco1 IS INITIAL.
vbkd-inco1 = kuwev-inco1.
vbkd-inco2 = kuwev-inco2.
ENDIF.
Is there any other standard way to fetch the value from the ship to? Please share the experience! Thanks in advance
Edited by: SAPGeorge on Mar 3, 2012 3:32 AM

HI,
I dont think there is any other way for the same.
As of your issue:
Inco terms are determined based on customer masters.So in genral you can not populate them at header level or at item level.
In order to populate them , you need to implement a user exit in sales order processing to bring the incoterms at line items based on the line item delivery plant. For That as you also written :
In program MV45AFZZ, in FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBKD:
If SVBKD-TABIX = 0.
VBKD-INCO1 = KUWEV-INCO1. "IncoTerms Part 1
VBKD-INCO2 = KUWEV-INCO2. "IncoTerms Part 2
EndIf.
Note that this is only done in order create mode, so that you can make changes subsequently & not have them overwritten.
Other Alternative if you do not want to use the User exit, Then create Mutiple ship to parties with different incoterms and use respective ship to party while creating the sales order.
Thanks
Edited by: C.Ankit on Mar 3, 2012 7:19 AM

Invoice Split due to incoterms Part 2

Hello SAP experts..
Kindly advise on the follwing issue.
In delivery related billing I am having Incoterms part 2 as By ROAD in payer custoer msaster.
In the sales order also I am having the same incoterms 2.
But at the time of delivery, due to some reasons I am chaing it to BY TRAIN or BY AIR,.
This is resulting in invoice split. In the split analysis it is showing ' header data different- incoterms part 2"
we do not want the invoice split even after chaning the incoterms part 2. Also do not want to change the incoterms in customer master also.
Kindly adivse on the same//
Regards
RaviRaj0308

Hello SD Experts
I am explaing the situation here again,,,,,
1) We have document flow like this. Order- Delivery- Invoice- supplementary order- supplementary invoice
2) We make the supplementary order with ref to Invoice which could be more than 1 sometimes. So these invoice might have different incoterms 2.
3) We make & save the supplementary order & save it.
4) then we make invoice with ref to this supplementary order, which is getting split, which we do not want.
5) Also the split analysis says " different header data- incoterms 2"
Question 1) How to restrict the "Invoice Split"
Question 2) If not possible through the settings, which user exit/ development I should ask to ABAP team.
Fell free to ask further queries.
Thanks & Regards
RaviRaj0308
Edited by: RaviRaj0308 on May 26, 2011 1:24 PM

Incoterms issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for