Independant window?

ok. is it possible to make the link pull up in a separate
window without closing the site. i want to be able to display a
photo gallery by pressing a link and having it open in its own
window. but without leaving the site.
Dreamweaver has a behavoir that allows me to open a new
window on a link but i dont know if something like that can be done
with flash or not.
I will try to explain what i am doing. My photo gallery i
have made is separate from the flash site. So when i click on the
gallery link, i want the swf of the gallery to pop up in its own
window on top of the page im on. Right now it leaves the site and
goes to the page, which stops the music of course and leads me to
have toput a back button to return instead of just closing
window.

http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_14192
tells you all about how to create a pop up and control the browser
size. Look under the ActionScript 2.0 area where it states
var jscommand:String = "window.open('
http://www.adobe.com','win','height=200,width=300,toolbar=no,scrollbars=yes');";
getURL("javascript:" + jscommand + " void(0);");
that's a little easier to use.

Similar Messages

I hate Tabs (and tab groups), give me independent windows!

Raptor/SQLDev 10.1.3--1215
The little collapsing panes like Connections, Reports, Snippets work really well to maximize usable area, but constraining all the file windows to a single Raptor window is a pain in the neck.
I'm using Raptor on a two-screened Macintosh and I simply can't make use of all my screen if the edit windows all need to live in the main Raptor window.
This style of UI was created by Microsoft as "Multiple-Document Interface" in the early 1990's and frankly it never worked for me. I want to see windows side-by-side, I want to be able to overlap them partially when I need to without resizing them. And on my Mac, I have this cool Exposé feature letting me find independent windows really, really easily. Won't work with Raptor.
Please provide a way to have edit windows (or tab groups) outside the main Raptor frame.

I don't ever use it because I think it is odd to have tabs floating around my desktop but you can drag Snippets, Connections and Reports outside the SQL Developer Window - Detail tabs and the Worksheet can't be. Not sure if this works on a Mac or if this is what you were looking for but wanted to mention it.
-- Sharon

In 26.0, how do I put Download, Bookmarks, History, and Tags into separate windows? I have multi-monitor system and place these different windows . . .

Hello,
I recently, decided to upgrade from 19.0b to the current (26.0) version, as "Tab Utilities" now supports 26, but am finding one of the visual changes counter productive. My two workstations have multiple monitors. One has 2 monitors (2560x1600) and the other one has 4 monitors (2560x1600). On both workstations, I'll place the various Firefox informational windows off the "main monitor" (the one directly in front of me). This way they're available to me at a glance.
(Side note: I refer to my monitors, as 2L, 1 2R and the 4th as "auxiliary.") The one thing I miss most is being able size these Firefox windows independently and in different positions.
I mean I'm used to seeing "Download" on monitor 2R on the right side (1/8 of screen) behind Microsoft Process Explorer's System Information. While the History will be on monitor 2L on the right side at 1/4 of the screen). I'm used to glancing out my right eye at the downloads and when needing something from the past, it's right next to the main monitor #1. This way I can access history quickly.
I can see why a developer (with one monitor say 1920 x 1080) would love seeing one window, but why can't Firefox support both single and multiple monitor users at the same?
Anyway, is there a way to get 26.0 to place at least "Download" and "History" in separate sizable windows?
(I'm not jumping up and down to go back to 19.0b or to try 25, but would like to stay current.)

Hello,
Thank you for your very quick reply. Before I read your reply completely, let me see if I can answer your first concern.
> Maybe I am missing your point.
Maybe I'm not making the point properly. Honestly, I never explained the issue from how it is directly affecting me.
OK, let's do a real world example of what I'm seeing on my two monitor system. I'll first describe what I experienced with 19.0b and earlier, which is IMHO how it should work in 26 and beyond ('''''as an option'''''). Next, I'll review what I'm seeing in 26.0. Hopefully this will help you understand what changed, from a practical perspective.
In 19.0b (and how I like working) for a multiple monitor system:
On the main monitor, I'm running Firefox. It is 1920 x 1080 and is in the lower right hand corner.
On the the monitor to my right (2R), I have the Download Manager list of downloading and downloaded file. It is in the upper right hand corner and takes up about 300 x 1500 pixels.
For a two monitor system, I have the History List running beside Firefox in the lower right hand corner and it is 600 x 1080.
For a three (plus) monitor system, I have the History List running on my left (2L) monitor. It is in the lower right hand corner and is 600 x 1080 pixels big.
For 26.0: I'm seeing the following:
On the main monitor, I'm running Firefox. It is 1920 x 1080 and is in the lower right hand corner. (This is the SAME as with 19.0b.)
When I start the Download Manager and have it set up as I do for 19.0b, it looks OK. It is on monitor 2R and is 450 x 1500 pixels (because of the new navigation side bar).
'''''The problem STARTS NOW (when I start the History List).'''''
When starting the History List, it replaces the Download Manger on the 2R monitor in the 450 x 1500 pixel window. This doesn't work for me because:
1) It is too far away to see. (NOTE: I put it on the 2L monitor in the lower right hand corner. so I can see it easier for the 3+ monitor. In the case of the 2 monitor, I put it beside Firefox again to see it easier.)
Some might ask, but the Download Manager is on the 2R and right side, why can't the History List be there too? Good question, and I can only reply saying:
1) Personal choice.
2) The Download Manager is NOT as busy as the History List and I find it easy to read.
3) The History List is a lot busier and the font size looks to be smaller (might be the same, but it looks smaller to my eyes). I need it closer to me / Firefox.
What I'm saying is this . . . The Download Manager and History List have <ul>''valid reasons to be visible to the user at the same time''.</ul> They also need to be independent of one another for (at least) size and location.
Combining them together is OK for some people, but NOT for everyone. Please make it an option to combine (as in 26) and separate (25 and earlier).
I'm not sure this is the best way to put it, but here goes. Allow users to collapse or expand these various lists by using multiple windows. One window is the collapse view and multiple independent windows is the expand view.
I'll read and comment on the rest of your reply, soon. Thanks for allowing me hopefully to explain my point in a better manner. :-)

When I don't have the BROWSER menu option turned on, the WINDOW menu options are un-accessable by mouse

First of all, I would like to clarify which "menu" is un-accessable.
I'm referring to the menu that regardless of which program, a user can access by either clicking ALT + SPACE or by clicking the top left corner of the window. I'm NOT referring to the FIREFOX menu options, those I am fine with.
Normally, I can just move my mouse to the top left corner and double click to close a program. I used to be able to do that too with firefox 3.6. However, due to the new design, when I click the top left corner, I get the orange Firefox drop down menu. This is because firefox, due to the new update, no longer has an independent window bar that is the norm across most programs. The only way I can get this independent menu bar is to enable the browser menu bar. This however, adds two entire layers of bars, which defeats one of the purposes of the update, to give more viewing space
The Chrome browser also has the tab row on top, however, it doesn't have the issue I brought up. When I click the top left corner of the window, the regular WINDOW menu options pop up.
The reason why this is important to me is due to the fact that I use two monitors. Normally, I can just move my cursor to the top right and close the window without looking for my right hand side monitor, and then double click the top left hand side of my left hand side monitor to close the window. This is because with a 2 monitor set up, the "X" close button is located inconvinently in the middle of my two screens, forcing me to aim for the tiny small red rectangle, which is why I prefere to double click the top left corner; I don't have to aim.
I have long been a loyal user of firefox. Browsers like Chrome and others have been out ranking firefox for a long time, mozilla is only playing catch up here...
While I am glad for the update - better speed due to JaegerMonkey, the added hardware acceleration, the tab groups, and more, if the window menu problem is not resolved soon, this update is going to force me to switch browsers.
I look forward to a fix, or response on how to resolve this issue.
Many thanks,
Still a firefox user... for now

it's possible but there is likely no need to do this. what exactly is wrong with your computer? a simple reinstall of snow leopard on top of your current system will cure many ills and will preserve your data and applications. and many problems can be solved without reinstalling at all.
but if you insist on doing a wipe and install boot from the SL install DVD and start disk utility from utilities menu at the top. erase your hard drive using the erase tab in disk utility. then quit disk utility and proceed with the install. and if you do reinstall I suggest you back up your data first. otherwise it will be completely wiped when you erase your hard drive. and you should always back up anyway.
Message was edited by: V.K.

When launch w/ Seamless windows, doesn't effectively end session

To replicate, we are doing the following:
1) Have users launch MS Visio by clicking a link on our site as follows:
https://servername.com/sgd/launcher.jsp?o=Write&e=false
2) And Visio is running as a "Seamless Window"
The result: when a user closes Visio (clicks the "X" or file>exit application), the windows app server effectively logs out of that terminal services session, but SGD's object manager still shows that the session has been "suspended." Additionally, the taskbar tcc.exe icon is still present. Users then have trouble logging in again, get errors, etc.
But when we have visio launch in an independent window, and the user closes the app, everything works fine (the taskbar icon goes away and object manager shows that the session has actually closed).
This means we cannot use seamless windows in this way. Can Sun replicate this, and is there a workaround or a fix planned?
Thank you

Had a very similar issue with Linux KDE applications. Appears, we have corrected the issues � the issue was � the parent process forked a process, elevating the child to it's own parent disassociating the forked process, (child) from the parent. When the application was closed with �File close� all was fine, when the applications was closed with the �X� we saw the issue. To correct the issue � we changed the options in the ARRAY relative to �what to due� when the application exits and leveraged a no fork option available within the application. I realize this may not or will not help. But, we started looking at unconventional way's to launch applications and dug very deeply into the options as to how applications can be executed/launched, the options were relative to the application not SGD.

SGD 4.31 : How to display applications without window decoration

Hi,
I'm trying to display an application in a independant window without window decoration.
The kiosk mode doesn't fit because the window cannot be resize.
Is it possible ?
Thks for your help.

May be you can clarify what "window decoration" mean.
If you are seeing two sets of window control (minimize, maximize, close) in the top right hand, then verify that:
- application is indeed configured for seamless windows
- on the application server, there's a ttasw process running for that user
If you are still unable to get seamless window to work, try rebooting your windows application server.

Windows size problem when resume apps, TTA SGD E4.0

Hi,
I have a problem and can�t find the solution yet.
I open windows apps in my desktop with a 800x600 resolution, the app is
configured for independent window, clients maximun size and fill my screen
completely as suppose to do. Then I close the window app clicking the X icon
to suspend the emulator session.
When I resume a suspended emulator session or move to other workstation and
take the session over the emulator session window size is 640x480 and stick
there whatever I try to do, worst is I can�t see the full window and also
there are no scroll bars, so I can�t reach the START icon on the lower left
to close the app because the session becomes useless.
The workarround solution was set the "scale to fit" properties in 640x480
and then I can see the full window to reach the star icon and close the app
to start over, but the user complain about the small letters and slow
performance. Another clue is if I click on the maximize icon the window try
to fill up my screen and then inmediatelly go back to 640x480.
[[root@arst1tta1 root]# /opt/tarantella/bin/tarantella version
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition for Intel Linux kernel
2.4+ (4.00.903)
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Platform Identity Pack
for Intel Linux kernel 2.4+ (4.00.903)
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Windows Connectivity
Pack for Intel Linux kernel 2.4+ (4.00.903)
Architecture code: i3li0204
This host: Linux arst1tta1.ar.lar.pi.pvt 2.4.9-e.34smp #1 SMP Wed Dec 10
16:52:22 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Any ideas ??
Thanks a lot in advance.
Marcelo

Carmelo,
Thanks for your answer but my problem is the Linux server OS, is Red Hat AS
2.1 wich is not supported in TTA 4.10.
When I tried to make the TTA upgrade failed due library issues.
Is my problem a reported bug for TTA 4.0 ???
Can you give any other advise or workarround ??
Regards.
Marcelo
"Carmelo" <[email protected]> escribi� en el mensaje
news:[email protected]...
there are some fixes in 4.10 that might help with this.
http://www.tarantella.com/support/documentation/sgd/ee/4.1/fixes.html
MarceloGonzalez wrote:
Sorry, I want to add that the same thing happens with a Linux KDE
session.
>>
"MarceloGonzalez" <[email protected]> escribi� en el mensaje
news:[email protected]...
Hi,
I have a problem and can�t find the solution yet.
I open windows apps in my desktop with a 800x600 resolution, the app is
configured for independent window, clients maximun size and fill my
screen
completely as suppose to do. Then I close the window app clicking the Xicon
to suspend the emulator session.
When I resume a suspended emulator session or move to other workstationand
take the session over the emulator session window size is 640x480 andstick
there whatever I try to do, worst is I can�t see the full window and
also
there are no scroll bars, so I can�t reach the START icon on the lowerleft
to close the app because the session becomes useless.
The workarround solution was set the "scale to fit" properties in
640x480
and then I can see the full window to reach the star icon and close theapp
to start over, but the user complain about the small letters and slow
performance. Another clue is if I click on the maximize icon the windowtry
to fill up my screen and then inmediatelly go back to 640x480.
[[root@arst1tta1 root]# /opt/tarantella/bin/tarantella version
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition for Intel Linux
kernel
2.4+ (4.00.903)
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Platform IdentityPack
for Intel Linux kernel 2.4+ (4.00.903)
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise Edition Windows Connectivity
Pack for Intel Linux kernel 2.4+ (4.00.903)
Architecture code: i3li0204
This host: Linux arst1tta1.ar.lar.pi.pvt 2.4.9-e.34smp #1 SMP Wed Dec 10
16:52:22 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Any ideas ??
Thanks a lot in advance.
Marcelo

Tarantella seamless windows problem

Hi there,
I am trying to set up seamless windows, everything is set as it should be yet it still fails to work...
windows 2003 terminal server
Sun Secure Global Desktop Enhancement Module is installed on the server
The Windows application object is configured for RDP and to use a seamless window
client version 4.20.909
When i open an application instead of opening in a seamless window it opens up in an independant window.
any thought???
thanks.

Hi,
I have nearly the same problem but in my configuration the seamless windows are working on the SSGD Server (Fedora Core 4) itself and on the Windows 2003 Application Server. If I try to use the semaless windows on my Win XP Client (either with Internet Explorer or with Firefox) it doesn't work - and I have no idea what the problem can be.
It worked once as I installed the Sun Secure Global Desktop Enhancement Module on the Windows 2003 Application Server and then tried to start a application which uses seamless windows but the next time I started an application there was no seamless window. I also tried to uninstall the Enhancement Module and reinstall it, but that doesn't help.
Maybe someone can help me!
Thanks in advance!
best regards
Ren�

Separate pop up windows

Hi All,
My web pages are 800x600 but I have a couple of example pages
with small description that I'd like to create. How can I just have
a small 200x300 window pop-up in its own window (not where you have
to use the back arrow - but independent window) that is my specific
size. Every time I try to create a new window it just makes it the
same size as my website.
As you can probably tell, I'm a novice so type slow :)

Short answer:
See DW's built-in Open Browser Window behavior.
Better answer:
See
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/popup_window_with_no_extra_markup.asp
E. Michael Brandt
www.divahtml.com
www.divahtml.com/products/scripts_dreamweaver_extensions.php
Standards-compliant scripts and Dreamweaver Extensions
www.valleywebdesigns.com/vwd_Vdw.asp
JustSo PictureWindow
JustSo PhotoAlbum, et alia

Multiple windows/taskbar buttons

Acrobat X, Windows XP ...
I previously had Acrobat 6. When I would print multiple documents from another application to PDF, or open multiple PDF documents, they would all go to the same Acrobat display, and would be selectable in the "Windows" dropdown in Acrobat.
Now, in Acrobat X, when I print multiple documents to PDF, each one opens what looks like a separate Acrobat X instance, with a new button on the taskbar at the bottom of the Windows desktop ... needless clutter! If I open ten docs, I wind up with ten buttons.
Is there a way to make all documents just go to the same place as before, not spawning new taskbar buttons?
Thanks.

By the way, if you have Windows 7 I think you can tell it to group the separate windows into a single taskbar item, but they will still remain independent windows.

Child window of application appears behind parent.

I have configured SSGD 4.4 and after logging in and launching a third party application the first child window appears on top of parent but all subsequent windows will appear behind parent. Is there a configuration setting to force all child windows to appear on top of parent windows?

thank you very much for your reply.
my sgd's application is runned in seamless window mode.
and if Run My application in an Independent Window or started via a standard RDP connection, the problem cannot be seen again. it seems to just happened in seamless windows.
My application is a website(jsp,javabean etc) installed in Application server . and I use Application server's IE to open it via sgd for some reasons.

X-Windows apps cause tcc to crash

Anyone else run into this? Right now froma full KDE desktop or from a konsole when I launch Netview (running off of an AIX system via SSH) the client crashes. It occurs several seconds into launch, with the map already visible. I tihnk it may occur when the event log is popualted in the control desk. If I reconnect to the session the client immediatly dies. I can use the classic Java applet client and get it to work just fine. Running Windows XP SP2 on an HP business desktop (i.e. embedded Intel graphics). Server is running on a virtualized Red Hat ES 4.
XML output fromt he crash:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<DATABASE>
<EXE NAME="tcc.exe" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_PRIVACY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="tcc.exe" SIZE="2576384" CHECKSUM="0x45B3520B" BIN_FILE_VERSION="4.3.0.915" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="4.3.0.915" PRODUCT_VERSION="4.30.915" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Sun Secure Global Desktop Client" COMPANY_NAME="Sun Microsystems, Inc." PRODUCT_NAME="Sun Secure Global Desktop Software" FILE_VERSION="4.30.915" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="TCC.EXE" INTERNAL_NAME="TCC" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="Copyright � 1998-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x40004" VERFILETYPE="0x1" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0x0" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="4.3.0.915" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="4.3.0.915" LINK_DATE="11/30/2006 18:45:49" UPTO_LINK_DATE="11/30/2006 18:45:49" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="kernel32.dll" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="kernel32.dll" SIZE="984064" CHECKSUM="0xF12E1D4A" BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945" PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Windows NT BASE API Client DLL" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Microsoft� Windows� Operating System" FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.060704-2349)" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="kernel32" INTERNAL_NAME="kernel32" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="� Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x40004" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0xF724D" LINKER_VERSION="0x50001" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2945" LINK_DATE="07/05/2006 10:55:00" UPTO_LINK_DATE="07/05/2006 10:55:00" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
</DATABASE>

Ideally, this is something you'd submit to support, then they can help capture the X intrinsics, and perhaps see what's causing the exception.
When I run into something like this, I try to vary the conditions to try and isolate the problem. For example,
1. If the Display is Client Window Management, change it to Independent Window.
2. Sounds as though you're launching an application on yet another system - that is, you're running a desktop, invoking ssh -X to yet another system to run Netview. How about running Netview directly as an SGD-hosted application, and bypassing the desktop / ssh step?
3. Alter color settings
4. You're running an old version of SGD; any possibility of an upgrade? I should mention, though, that I checked the release notes, and didn't notice any bug fixes that seemed to apply to this case.
5. Do you change your DISPLAY on the remote session before starting that aplication?
6. Any logs generated in .../var/log?
Also, are you aware of any X Extensions that the application might require?

Itunes Plays Video Very Jetky in Window

S
some time in the last couple of months, I started encountering severe video problems playing videos in a window. They play well in the tiny window that is part of Itunes and reasonably well full screen but only play about one frame/second in an independent window. They play perfectly in Quicktime!
Is there any cure? I have the latest Itunes/Quicktime and run Windows XP MCE 2005 on a Dell XPS400 with 1GB RAM. My video card is an ATI ALL-IN-WONDER 2006.

I think this is a problem with iTunes itself, maybe not be allocated enough processing power.
I've got a Mac Mini 1.42 and the same thing happens, especially on longer videos.

Dedicated preview window?

I'm using a multi monitor setup on my MacPro and I'd like to be able to code while seeing live updates. I know I can do this in a split screen view but I was wondering if there was any way to use a dedicated preview window instead? That's to say one monitor contains my preview while the other contains my source. I don't plan to ever edit anything in design/preview mode, I'd just like to see a representation of my work without splitting my screen, toggling between modes or using a dedicated web browser and manually reloading.
I don't think this functionality is built in (best I can tell) but are there any extensions that offer this type of functionality?

If you want to work in Code view on one monitor and see Design view on another, use the Code Inspector (F10/Opt+F10). It's an independent window that shows just code.

Qosmio G30 - Need two Windows operating systems: Vista and XP

Hello,
can somebody help me about procedure for next request:
I need both operating systems on my Qosmio: Vista and XP
I have two RAID drives inside my Qosmio and I have installed Vista on first one.
I tried to install XP on second hard drive and I did that (I inserted XP installation disk and sellected second drive for installation) but after installation I had just XP boot option.
I can see all Vista files on the first disc, but boot sector enables XP only. XP Windows directory was intalled on second drive, but boot.ini and some system files were in the root of the first drive.
I prefered Vista and I repeated the procedure (with my recovery Vista CD) and now I have Vista on first disk and all files of XP on second disk. I did not investigate how to obtain complete bootable XP system on second disk.
What I need:
Vista on first drive.
XP on second drive
I would like to have completely independent Windows system. That means I need boot selection by BIOS, not by Vista or XP.

Thank you for your help,
but I have solved my problem by the next way:
Fistly I installed Vista by the recovery disk.
After that I phisically removed the disk No. 1. (open the cover unscrew the hard disk and put out the hard disk).
I started the Qosmio and I was informed that disk No.1 has problem but I continued with CD boot procedure with XP installation disk inside. I installed the XP on the disk No. 2, and after that I put the hard disk No.1. on its position again.
Now, I can boot my Qosmio from the disk No.1 with Vista, or from the hard disk No.2 under XP operating system.
That is all. The screw driver has solved all my problems with BIOS possibilites and hard disk enable/disable.
Best regards,
Dragan

Independant window?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for